wetland processes in lpj-guess -new possibilities filedoc processes added into the customized arctic...

14
Wetland processes in LPJ-GUESS -new possibilities Adrian Gustafson Supervisors: Paul Miller, Ben Smith, Robert Björk Lund University Department of Physical Geography and Ecosystem Science Centre for Environment and Climate Research With contributions from Paul Miller and Jing Tang

Upload: duongnhi

Post on 06-Aug-2019

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Wetland processes in LPJ-GUESS -new possibilities fileDOC processes added into the customized arctic version of LPJ-GUESS • For both peatland and mineral soils, the model considered

Wetland processes in LPJ-GUESS-new possibilities

Adrian GustafsonSupervisors: Paul Miller, Ben Smith, Robert Björk

Lund University Department of Physical Geography and Ecosystem Science

Centre for Environment and Climate Research

With contributions from Paul Miller and Jing Tang

Page 2: Wetland processes in LPJ-GUESS -new possibilities fileDOC processes added into the customized arctic version of LPJ-GUESS • For both peatland and mineral soils, the model considered

A little bit of history…• Wetland processes have previously been included in the special WhyMe-

version of LPJ-GUESS (Wetland Hydrology and Methane)

• New PFTs for the high latitudes were parameterised and incorporated by Wolff et al. (2008, 2010)

• N-cycling was incorporated with large implications on C-cycling and vegetation distribution

• These features have been incorporated into the framework of LPJ-GUESS, where also land use and land use change is modelled.

• Peatland heterogeneity have been investigated, where water was allowed to move from one patch to another

• DOC have been explored more recently

Page 3: Wetland processes in LPJ-GUESS -new possibilities fileDOC processes added into the customized arctic version of LPJ-GUESS • For both peatland and mineral soils, the model considered

• link structure to function, accounting for feedbacks between them

• link ’fast’ (physiology, biogeochemistry) and ’slow’ (demography, composition) ecosystem processes

• account for transient ecosystem dynamics when driving conditions (climate, CO2) are changing rapidly

LPJ-GUESS – a global vegetation-ecosystem model

Soil organicmatter

Soil organicmatter

soil bio- geochemistry

populationdynamics

& disturbance

plant biogeography

primary production & growth

Vegetation

climate land use

CO2 N-deposition

Smith et al. 2001, 2014

Simulated natural vegetation of Lithuania

soil texture

Page 4: Wetland processes in LPJ-GUESS -new possibilities fileDOC processes added into the customized arctic version of LPJ-GUESS • For both peatland and mineral soils, the model considered

Representing peatland heterogeneity

Chaudhary et al., 2017. Biogeosciences

Simulating peat build-up

Page 5: Wetland processes in LPJ-GUESS -new possibilities fileDOC processes added into the customized arctic version of LPJ-GUESS • For both peatland and mineral soils, the model considered

Wetland hydrology• A separate hydrology scheme for wetlands

• Soil is divided into acrotelm (sequentially inundated) and catotelm (permanently inundated)

• Water table position (WTP) in the acrotelm is modelled dynamically over time given climate input

• Evapotranspiration and runoff is dependent on the height of the WTP

• Wetland decomposition is reduced, which causes a larger buildup of peat/SOM.

• Plants become stressed if the water table position is too high, and PFTs tolerate inundation to a varying degree

Page 6: Wetland processes in LPJ-GUESS -new possibilities fileDOC processes added into the customized arctic version of LPJ-GUESS • For both peatland and mineral soils, the model considered

Methane

Wania et a., 2010. Global Biogeochemical Cycles

Page 7: Wetland processes in LPJ-GUESS -new possibilities fileDOC processes added into the customized arctic version of LPJ-GUESS • For both peatland and mineral soils, the model considered

An example from Degerö

Page 8: Wetland processes in LPJ-GUESS -new possibilities fileDOC processes added into the customized arctic version of LPJ-GUESS • For both peatland and mineral soils, the model considered

WTP drives plant composition and CH4 emissions

mm/day

Page 9: Wetland processes in LPJ-GUESS -new possibilities fileDOC processes added into the customized arctic version of LPJ-GUESS • For both peatland and mineral soils, the model considered

Wetland emissions from sites

Page 10: Wetland processes in LPJ-GUESS -new possibilities fileDOC processes added into the customized arctic version of LPJ-GUESS • For both peatland and mineral soils, the model considered

Global CH4 emissions from wetlands

(kg CH4 m-2 yr-1)

Page 11: Wetland processes in LPJ-GUESS -new possibilities fileDOC processes added into the customized arctic version of LPJ-GUESS • For both peatland and mineral soils, the model considered

(g CH4 yr-1)

Mean annual CH4 emissions per grid2000 - 2012

Page 12: Wetland processes in LPJ-GUESS -new possibilities fileDOC processes added into the customized arctic version of LPJ-GUESS • For both peatland and mineral soils, the model considered

Thanks for listening!

Page 13: Wetland processes in LPJ-GUESS -new possibilities fileDOC processes added into the customized arctic version of LPJ-GUESS • For both peatland and mineral soils, the model considered

DOC processes added into the customized arctic version of LPJ-GUESS

• For both peatland and mineral soils, the model considered processes include: DOC production, mineralization, diffusion, sorption-desorption, leaching.

• At catchment scale, the model also considers lateral transport of DOC based on runoff.

• The developed model has been applied in a subarctic catchment.

Peatland

(Tang et al., 2018)

Page 14: Wetland processes in LPJ-GUESS -new possibilities fileDOC processes added into the customized arctic version of LPJ-GUESS • For both peatland and mineral soils, the model considered

Peatland

• For peatland soils, DOC exports in snowmelt season is less dominant compared to mineral soils in the same region.

• Desorption is strongest in May (snow melt water adding in) and the sorption occurs mainly in winter months;

• DOC production peaks in August