what does “community” mean for farmer adoption of conservation practices? some logic and...
DESCRIPTION
What does “community” mean for farmer adoption of conservation practices? Some logic and evidence. Graham Marshall Institute for Rural Futures, Uni. of New England. “We are trying to encourage a process of self-help … Some day the local community has to pick up all this.” - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: What does “community” mean for farmer adoption of conservation practices? Some logic and evidence](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070502/56814bce550346895db8a4d4/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
www.RuralPracticeChange.org
Department ofPrimary Industries
What does “community” mean for farmer adoption of conservation practices?
Some logic and evidence
Graham Marshall
Institute for Rural Futures, Uni. of New England
![Page 2: What does “community” mean for farmer adoption of conservation practices? Some logic and evidence](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070502/56814bce550346895db8a4d4/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
www.RuralPracticeChange.org
![Page 3: What does “community” mean for farmer adoption of conservation practices? Some logic and evidence](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070502/56814bce550346895db8a4d4/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
www.RuralPracticeChange.org
“We are trying to encourage a process of self-help … Some day the local community has to pick up all this.”
- Commonwealth Dep’t Primary Industries & Energy, 1989.
![Page 4: What does “community” mean for farmer adoption of conservation practices? Some logic and evidence](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070502/56814bce550346895db8a4d4/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
www.RuralPracticeChange.org
“A strong feeling of ownership over the NRM planning process will increase motivation and likelihood that the outcomes identified in the regional integrated NRM plans are achieved.”
- National NRM Capacity Building
Framework, 2002
![Page 5: What does “community” mean for farmer adoption of conservation practices? Some logic and evidence](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070502/56814bce550346895db8a4d4/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
www.RuralPracticeChange.org
Key points The raison d’etre of community-based
NRM lies in helping people to help themselves
We need to acknowledge, understand, and learn how to address the “Samaritan’s Dilemma” that faces us in helping farmers’ self-help
Targets, program logic, and M & E need, at all levels, to change as we learn.
![Page 6: What does “community” mean for farmer adoption of conservation practices? Some logic and evidence](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070502/56814bce550346895db8a4d4/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
www.RuralPracticeChange.org
Origins and evolution of rural CBNRM in Australia
Prior approaches to helping farmers conserve natural resources fostered dependency
NRM programs seek to help people manage their resource problems
Community-based NRM programs seek to help people to help themselves
![Page 7: What does “community” mean for farmer adoption of conservation practices? Some logic and evidence](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070502/56814bce550346895db8a4d4/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
www.RuralPracticeChange.org
CBNRM soon became understood mainly through the lens of “extension thinking”
Rural extension was the dominant social-scientific tradition for agricultural issues
Governments concerned that farmers lacked awareness, knowledge, skills and attitudes needed to address NRM issues
Political reasons for CBNRM focusing “community” programs on extension
![Page 8: What does “community” mean for farmer adoption of conservation practices? Some logic and evidence](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070502/56814bce550346895db8a4d4/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
www.RuralPracticeChange.org
Politicians/officials attracted by lure of CBNRM stretching funds further by ‘kick starting’ local voluntarism
Ongoing financial support comes to be accepted, but emphasis on self-help persists
![Page 9: What does “community” mean for farmer adoption of conservation practices? Some logic and evidence](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070502/56814bce550346895db8a4d4/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
www.RuralPracticeChange.org
The Samaritan’s Dilemma
![Page 10: What does “community” mean for farmer adoption of conservation practices? Some logic and evidence](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070502/56814bce550346895db8a4d4/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
www.RuralPracticeChange.org
“The paradox of supplying help to self-help is the fundamental conundrum of all helping relationships. Most external help actually overrides or undercuts the budding capacity for self-help and thus ends up being unhelpful”.
- David Ellerman, 2007.
![Page 11: What does “community” mean for farmer adoption of conservation practices? Some logic and evidence](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070502/56814bce550346895db8a4d4/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
www.RuralPracticeChange.org
1978 ~ James Buchanan developed a game-theory model of this paradox called the “Samaritan’s Dilemma”
Self-interest of helper propels unconditional help, thus weakening self-help compulsion to see problems solved empire-building, turf protection, “getting money out the door” scepticism about recipient capacities for self-help
The helper needs “strategic courage” but Buchanan felt increasing wealth had made “soft options”
too hard to resist
![Page 12: What does “community” mean for farmer adoption of conservation practices? Some logic and evidence](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070502/56814bce550346895db8a4d4/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
www.RuralPracticeChange.org
1979 ~ The neo-liberal “revolution” begins (with Thatcherism)
Strong on strategic courage, but weak on theory
Committed to smaller government and reciprocity
Focus on market (and market-like) solutions Purchaser-provider arrangements embraced Reciprocity to be enforced by rigorous
accountability measures
![Page 13: What does “community” mean for farmer adoption of conservation practices? Some logic and evidence](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070502/56814bce550346895db8a4d4/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
www.RuralPracticeChange.org
Helping self-help under regional NRM delivery
![Page 14: What does “community” mean for farmer adoption of conservation practices? Some logic and evidence](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070502/56814bce550346895db8a4d4/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
www.RuralPracticeChange.org
Regional delivery model a neo-liberal exercise in “new public management”
Stringent financial accountability measures follow frustrations with “cost shifting”
But coercing reciprocity is costly Limited resources to monitor compliance with
conditions attached to help Difficult to establish the “without help scenario”
![Page 15: What does “community” mean for farmer adoption of conservation practices? Some logic and evidence](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070502/56814bce550346895db8a4d4/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
www.RuralPracticeChange.org
Most farmer lapses in reciprocating help may be motivated unconsciously by reduced pressure to help themselves, eg. by reducing land-use intensity keeping up with R&D experimenting with solutions on-farm sending kids to university cooperating with neighbours
Help is unlikely to strengthen farmer self-help substantially unless most of their reciprocity is voluntary
![Page 16: What does “community” mean for farmer adoption of conservation practices? Some logic and evidence](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070502/56814bce550346895db8a4d4/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
www.RuralPracticeChange.org
CBNRM, farmers, and reciprocity
![Page 17: What does “community” mean for farmer adoption of conservation practices? Some logic and evidence](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070502/56814bce550346895db8a4d4/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
www.RuralPracticeChange.org
Robert Axelrod identified two ways of promoting reciprocity:
1.Change the payoffs (to make reciprocity consistent with actors’ goals); and/or
2.Make the future more important relative to the present (“enlarge the shadow of the future”)
![Page 18: What does “community” mean for farmer adoption of conservation practices? Some logic and evidence](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070502/56814bce550346895db8a4d4/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
www.RuralPracticeChange.org
How might CBNRM “change the payoffs”?
Greater “community ownership” of decisions by farmers?
Greater “ownership” of funds by administrators increases their strategic courage?
Or … community body less able to deny help when reciprocity requires? advantages of government acting as “bad cop”
![Page 19: What does “community” mean for farmer adoption of conservation practices? Some logic and evidence](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070502/56814bce550346895db8a4d4/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
www.RuralPracticeChange.org
How might CBNRM enlarge the “shadow of the future”?
Easier mutual monitoring by helpers and recipients?
More durable interactions between helpers and recipients?
More frequent interactions between helpers and recipients?
![Page 20: What does “community” mean for farmer adoption of conservation practices? Some logic and evidence](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070502/56814bce550346895db8a4d4/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
www.RuralPracticeChange.org
Some evidence
![Page 21: What does “community” mean for farmer adoption of conservation practices? Some logic and evidence](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070502/56814bce550346895db8a4d4/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
www.RuralPracticeChange.org
Method1. Survey a sample of farmers2. Measure their (a) trust in their community-
based agency, and (b) intentions to adopt practices it promotes to them.
3. Test statistically whether the relationship between trust and intentions is positive (indicating reciprocity).
4. Control for influence of other relevant factors.
![Page 22: What does “community” mean for farmer adoption of conservation practices? Some logic and evidence](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070502/56814bce550346895db8a4d4/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
www.RuralPracticeChange.org
Two projects:1. Land and Water Management
Planning (LWMP) in NSW’s Murray Irrigation Districts - surveyed 1999.
2. Regional NRM delivery in 3 NRM regions – surveyed 2006:
• Fitzroy Basin (Qld)• Mallee (Vic)• South West Catchments (WA).
![Page 23: What does “community” mean for farmer adoption of conservation practices? Some logic and evidence](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070502/56814bce550346895db8a4d4/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
www.RuralPracticeChange.org
7,490 km2; 25,000 people; 1,610 farms. Historic antagonism between irrigators
and NSW Government 1991 ~ Start developing community-
based plans focused on irrigation salinity
1996 ~ Murray Irrigation Ltd, co-owned by irrigators, made responsible for ensuring farmers help implement the LWMPs by complying with their cost-sharing commitments .
Murray LWMP project
![Page 24: What does “community” mean for farmer adoption of conservation practices? Some logic and evidence](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070502/56814bce550346895db8a4d4/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
www.RuralPracticeChange.org
A significant positive relationship was found between farmers’ intentions to comply and their trust in their community-based corporation
Indicates that farmers were interacting with CBNRM arrangements on the basis of reciprocity
![Page 25: What does “community” mean for farmer adoption of conservation practices? Some logic and evidence](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070502/56814bce550346895db8a4d4/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
www.RuralPracticeChange.org
Regional delivery project Fitzroy Basin Region
156,000 km2; 200,000 people. CBNRM body is Fitzroy Basin Association (FBA)
Central Highlands sub-region 45,000 km2; 20,000 people. CBNRM body is Central Highlands Resources Use
Planning Cooperative (CHRRUP)
![Page 26: What does “community” mean for farmer adoption of conservation practices? Some logic and evidence](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070502/56814bce550346895db8a4d4/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
www.RuralPracticeChange.org
Mallee Region 39,000 km2; 65,000 people. focused on dryland area of region. CBNRM body is Mallee Catchment Management
Authority. NRM delivery not devolved to sub-regional level
![Page 27: What does “community” mean for farmer adoption of conservation practices? Some logic and evidence](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070502/56814bce550346895db8a4d4/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
www.RuralPracticeChange.org
South West Catchments Region 51,657 km2; 193,000 people; 5,000 farms. CBNRM body is South West Catchments Council.
Blackwood Basin sub-region 23,500 km2; 37,000 people; 2,000 farms. CBNRM body is Blackwood Basin Group (BBG).
![Page 28: What does “community” mean for farmer adoption of conservation practices? Some logic and evidence](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070502/56814bce550346895db8a4d4/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
www.RuralPracticeChange.org
Given the(a) greater scales of the regional-delivery cases, compared with the LWMP case, and(b) logic that increased scale lessens farmer incentives to practise reciprocity,• … Farmer reciprocity was expected to be weaker in the regional-delivery cases• … Although less weakened when delivery was devolved to the sub-regional level.
![Page 29: What does “community” mean for farmer adoption of conservation practices? Some logic and evidence](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070502/56814bce550346895db8a4d4/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
www.RuralPracticeChange.org
Models were estimated for each of the 22 key conservation practices promoted across the three regions (7 by CHRRUP, 7 by Mallee CMA, 8 by BBG)
Only one model (4.5%) indicated farmers were practising reciprocity with their regional CBNRM body
This model was for the Mallee Region, where farmer interaction with the regional body was not reduced by presence of a sub-regional body
In the two regions with sub-regional bodies, 9 of the 15 models (60%) indicated farmers were practising reciprocity with their subregional body
![Page 30: What does “community” mean for farmer adoption of conservation practices? Some logic and evidence](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070502/56814bce550346895db8a4d4/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
www.RuralPracticeChange.org
Devolving “NRM helping” to CBNRM arrangements can be effective in strengthening farmer capacities for self-help, although this benefit declines with increasing scale of CBNRM
Caveat: Conclusions based on a limited set of cases – hypotheses only.
![Page 31: What does “community” mean for farmer adoption of conservation practices? Some logic and evidence](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070502/56814bce550346895db8a4d4/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
www.RuralPracticeChange.org
Conclusions
![Page 32: What does “community” mean for farmer adoption of conservation practices? Some logic and evidence](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070502/56814bce550346895db8a4d4/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
www.RuralPracticeChange.org
The raison d’etre of community-based NRM lies in helping people to help themselves
It is about making community members more likely to reciprocate the help given them under CBNRM
Help from CBNRM may include leadership, networking, R&D, financial incentives, social incentives, regulation, extension, etc. Extension is important but only part of the picture
![Page 33: What does “community” mean for farmer adoption of conservation practices? Some logic and evidence](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070502/56814bce550346895db8a4d4/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
www.RuralPracticeChange.org
We need to acknowledge, understand, and learn systematically how to solve the Samaritan’s Dilemma
A “business approach” to CBNRM requires us – at all levels - to devise targets, milestones, program logics and M&E strategies accordingly.
![Page 34: What does “community” mean for farmer adoption of conservation practices? Some logic and evidence](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070502/56814bce550346895db8a4d4/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
www.RuralPracticeChange.org
Key points The raison d’etre of community-based
NRM lies in helping people to help themselves
We need to acknowledge, understand, and learn how to address the “Samaritan’s Dilemma” that faces us in helping farmers’ self-help
Targets, program logic, and M & E need, at all levels, to change as we learn.
![Page 35: What does “community” mean for farmer adoption of conservation practices? Some logic and evidence](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070502/56814bce550346895db8a4d4/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
www.RuralPracticeChange.org