what have we lost locally? 14 employee’s to layoffs this fiscal budget, with more potentially. no...

16

Upload: jasmin-stout

Post on 14-Dec-2015

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: What Have We Lost Locally? 14 Employee’s to layoffs this fiscal budget, with more potentially. No wage increase this fiscal year. 10% increase in insurance
Page 2: What Have We Lost Locally? 14 Employee’s to layoffs this fiscal budget, with more potentially. No wage increase this fiscal year. 10% increase in insurance

What Have We Lost Locally?

• 14 Employee’s to layoffs this fiscal budget, with more potentially.

• No wage increase this fiscal year.

• 10% increase in insurance contribution.

• 4 unpaid day’s.

Page 3: What Have We Lost Locally? 14 Employee’s to layoffs this fiscal budget, with more potentially. No wage increase this fiscal year. 10% increase in insurance

What Can We Lose?• AFSCME Local 1891 average yearly

salary $50,585.• Defined Benefit Pension IMRF

Senate Bill 1946 has cut benefits for new hires. While Evanston City Council

contemplates what they can do.• JOBS, JOBS, JOBS!!!!

Page 4: What Have We Lost Locally? 14 Employee’s to layoffs this fiscal budget, with more potentially. No wage increase this fiscal year. 10% increase in insurance

HighStakes,ToughChoices

Page 5: What Have We Lost Locally? 14 Employee’s to layoffs this fiscal budget, with more potentially. No wage increase this fiscal year. 10% increase in insurance

Election 2010 takes Place in Perilous Times

Page 6: What Have We Lost Locally? 14 Employee’s to layoffs this fiscal budget, with more potentially. No wage increase this fiscal year. 10% increase in insurance

Unprecedented Budget Crisis for Public Services

Page 7: What Have We Lost Locally? 14 Employee’s to layoffs this fiscal budget, with more potentially. No wage increase this fiscal year. 10% increase in insurance

Intensified attacks on public service workers

Page 8: What Have We Lost Locally? 14 Employee’s to layoffs this fiscal budget, with more potentially. No wage increase this fiscal year. 10% increase in insurance

Next Governor will have to deal

seriously with shortfall

• Smoke and mirrors can’t cut it any more

• Whoever is elected will make decisions we

don’t like

Page 9: What Have We Lost Locally? 14 Employee’s to layoffs this fiscal budget, with more potentially. No wage increase this fiscal year. 10% increase in insurance

How do we position ourselves to best defend

our interests?

Page 10: What Have We Lost Locally? 14 Employee’s to layoffs this fiscal budget, with more potentially. No wage increase this fiscal year. 10% increase in insurance

Pat Quinn (D)Bill Brady (R)Rich Whitney (G)

Page 11: What Have We Lost Locally? 14 Employee’s to layoffs this fiscal budget, with more potentially. No wage increase this fiscal year. 10% increase in insurance

Quinn v. Brady:

Wages and Benefits

Brady Quinn*Does not believe pension cuts for

current employees are unconstitutional.

*Wants to eliminate state pensions; switch to 401(k).

*Wants no employer matching contributions to retirement plan.

*Says state employees are overpaid 10-30%.

*Voted for two tier pensions (SB1946).

Sources: Chicagobusinesss.com 6/29/10, ilga.gov

*Opposes pension cuts for current employees as

unconstitutional.*Supported two tier pensions

(SB 1946).*Supports continuation of

current defined benefit pension plan.

Page 12: What Have We Lost Locally? 14 Employee’s to layoffs this fiscal budget, with more potentially. No wage increase this fiscal year. 10% increase in insurance

Quinn v. Brady:

Revenue andthe Budget

Brady Quinn*Vows to veto any tax increase.*Wants to cut 10% from state

agencies, education, and other programs.

*Wants to cut taxes by$1 billion.

*Supports income tax increase to address

budget shortfallSources: ilga.gov, BradyforIllinois.com

Page 13: What Have We Lost Locally? 14 Employee’s to layoffs this fiscal budget, with more potentially. No wage increase this fiscal year. 10% increase in insurance

Quinn v. Brady:

Layoffs and Privatization

Brady Quinn*Voted to repeal ban on private

prisons(HB 2656 Amendment 4, 1993-1994)

*Voted to close Sheridan CC, Zeller MHC, and IYC Valley View.

(SB 2393, 2002)

*Has opposed placing any limits on privatization

(HB 735, 1997; HB 1959, 1999; HB 2382, 2002; HB 1347, 2007)

*Opposes state hiring during recession

(Bradyforillinois.com)

*Entered into ‘no layoff’ agreement

*Has brought sub-contracted work in-house

*Closed Howe DC and Thomson CC

Page 14: What Have We Lost Locally? 14 Employee’s to layoffs this fiscal budget, with more potentially. No wage increase this fiscal year. 10% increase in insurance

Quinn v. Brady:

Worker Rights

Brady Quinn*Opposed ban on hiring

replacement workersduring strike.

HB 2802 (1993)

*Opposed unemployment benefits for locked out workers.

SB 1350 (2009)

*Opposed protecting privacy of public employee evaluations.

HB 5154 (2010)

*Pressured employer to settle Heartland strike.

*Supported Gateway strikers.*Entered into agreement to restrict mandatory overtime.

*Vetoed bill protecting privacy of public employee

evaluations.HB 5154 (2010)

Page 15: What Have We Lost Locally? 14 Employee’s to layoffs this fiscal budget, with more potentially. No wage increase this fiscal year. 10% increase in insurance

Rich Whitney:Right on the issues,

but is he a viable candidate?

Page 16: What Have We Lost Locally? 14 Employee’s to layoffs this fiscal budget, with more potentially. No wage increase this fiscal year. 10% increase in insurance

Governor QuinnOur best chance at saving our

jobs, saving our pensions, saving our state.