what is basel iii and why should we regulate bank capital

17
Economics for your Classroom from Ed Dolan’s Econ Blog Financial Reform: What is Basel III and Why Should We Regulate Bank Capital? Revised March 2013 Terms of Use: These slides are provided under Creative Commons License Attribution—Share Alike 3.0 . You are free to use these slides as a resource for your economics classes together with whatever textbook you are using. If you like the slides, you may also want to take a look at my textbook, Introduction to Economics , from BVT Publishing. Munsterplatz, Basel, Switzerland Photo source: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Munsterplatz,_Basel ,_Switzerland.jpg

Upload: ed-dolan

Post on 19-Jan-2015

9.985 views

Category:

Education


2 download

DESCRIPTION

A set of slides discussing the Basel III financial reform proposals and the need to regulate bank capital

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: What is basel iii and why should we regulate bank capital

Economics for your Classroom fromEd Dolan’s Econ Blog

Financial Reform: What is Basel III and Why Should We

Regulate Bank Capital?Revised March 2013

Terms of Use: These slides are provided under Creative Commons License Attribution—Share Alike 3.0 . You are free to use these slides as a resource for your economics classes together with whatever textbook you are using. If you like the slides, you may also want to take a look at my textbook, Introduction to Economics, from BVT Publishing.

Munsterplatz, Basel, SwitzerlandPhoto source: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Munsterplatz,_Basel,_Switzerland.jpg

Page 2: What is basel iii and why should we regulate bank capital

What is Bank Capital?

A bank balance sheet records the financial condition of the bank Assets are the income-producing items the bank owns, like loans Liabilities are what it owes—its sources of funds, like deposits By definition, capital equals assets minus liabilities

Revised version March 2013 Ed Dolan’s Econ Blog

In banking, the term capital is used instead of the terms net worth or equity that are often used in other areas of accounting. These terms are synonyms.

Page 3: What is basel iii and why should we regulate bank capital

Why Banks Need Capital

Banks need capital for protection in case of losses on loans or other assets

Suppose a borrower defaults on a $50,000 loan, reducing total assets

The bank still owes depositors $900,000 After the loan loss, capital (assets minus

liabilities) falls by the amount of the loss If capital falls to zero or below . . .

the bank’s assets are no longer enough to cover what it owes depositors

It is insolvent and must cease operations Its shareholders stand to lose everything

they have invested

Revised version March 2013 Ed Dolan’s Econ Blog

Page 4: What is basel iii and why should we regulate bank capital

More Leverage Means More Risk

A bank with less capital in relation to its assets is said to have higher leverage

High leverage puts a bank at greater risk of insolvency

ExampleThe low-leverage bank (top) could survive

up to $500,000 in loan lossesThe higher-leverage bank (bottom) would

become insolvent after just $100,000 of loan losses

Revised version March 2013 Ed Dolan’s Econ Blog

Page 5: What is basel iii and why should we regulate bank capital

But More Leverage Also Means Higher Returns

More leverage means higher risk, but also higher returns for shareholders if the bank remains solvent

Assume interest received from loans to be 10% and interest paid on deposits to be 8%

Shareholders’ return is the difference between income and cost of depositsWith capital at 50% of assets (top),

shareholders’ rate of return on their invested capital is 12%

With capital at 10% of assets (bottom), shareholders’ rate of return increases to 28%

Revised version March 2013 Ed Dolan’s Econ Blog

Page 6: What is basel iii and why should we regulate bank capital

Regulators vs. Bankers’ Preferences for Leverage

Varying the degree of leverage creates a tradeoff for shareholders between risk of insolvency and rate of return

Bank regulators, who are concerned about the spillover effects that bank failures have on the rest of the economy, tend to prefer less risk, less leverage, and more capital than do bank managers

To limit risk to the financial system, regulators set minimum standards for bank capital

Revised version March 2013 Ed Dolan’s Econ Blog

Page 7: What is basel iii and why should we regulate bank capital

Who Regulates Bank Capital?

Bank regulators of individual countries do not act alone in setting rules for bank capital. They coordinate their capital regulation through the Basel Committee on Bank Supervision

The Committee meets at the, Bank for International Settlements (BIS), an international organization, founded in 1930, that fosters monetary and financial cooperation and acts as a bank for central banks

Revised version March 2013 Ed Dolan’s Econ Blog

Munsterplatz, Basel, SwitzerlandPhoto source: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Munsterplatz,_Basel,_Switzerland.jpg

Page 8: What is basel iii and why should we regulate bank capital

The Basel Accords

The Basel Committee periodically issues “accords” that set out international standards for bank capital as well as other bank regulations

The first Basel Accords, now called Basel I, were issued in 1988

They were replaced by a new set of standards, Basel II, in 2004.

Revised version March 2013 Ed Dolan’s Econ Blog

Photo source: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e4/Globe.png

Page 9: What is basel iii and why should we regulate bank capital

Failure of the Basel Accords

Unfortunately, Basel II failed to prevent the global financial crisis that began in 2007

Government rescues of failed or failing banks like Citibank (US), RBS (UK), and Fortis (EU) cost taxpayers billions of dollars, pounds, and euros

Failure of the Basel II standards can be traced to two major problems:They allowed banks to overstate their

true amount of capitalThey allowed banks to understate the

risks to which they were exposed

Revised version March 2013 Ed Dolan’s Econ Blog

Photo source: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Citibank_Tower.JPG

Page 10: What is basel iii and why should we regulate bank capital

Tangible Common Equity

Many observers think that the simplest measure of capital, called tangible common equity (TCE), is also the most accurate for measuring a bank’s exposure to risk

Tangible assets include only those like loans, securities, and buildings that could be sold by a failing firm to help pay its obligations

Equity capital equals tangible assets minus liabilities. It measures shareholder funds that are first in line to absorb risk in case of failure

Revised version March 2013 Ed Dolan’s Econ Blog

The ratio of tangible common equity to tangible assets to equity capital provides a measure of a bank’s exposure to risk. With a TCE ratio of 2%, this bank is solvent but its leverage and risk of failure are high

Page 11: What is basel iii and why should we regulate bank capital

Regulatory Capital

Basel II regulations did not use TCE to measure risk. Instead, instead they used the ratio of regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets

Both the numerator and denominator differ from the tangible common equity concept

Regulatory Capital

Risk-Weighted Assets

Revised version March 2013 Ed Dolan’s Econ Blog

Page 12: What is basel iii and why should we regulate bank capital

Regulatory Capital

Regulatory capital increases the numerator of a bank’s capital ratio in two ways compared with TCE

First, it counts certain intangible assets like goodwill and tax loss assets that contribute to possible future profits but could not be sold by a failing firm to raise cash

Second, it counts both common equity and hybrid capital (such as preferred stock) that is a mixture of debt and equity. Hybrid capital is a less reliable cushion against loss than common equity

Regulatory capital ratio = 100,000/1,050,000 = 9.5%, compared to tangible common equity of 2%

Revised version March 2013 Ed Dolan’s Econ Blog

Page 13: What is basel iii and why should we regulate bank capital

Risk-Weighted Assets: Example

For the denominator of the capital ratio, Basel II did not count all assets at full value

Instead, assets were assigned risk weights according to their ratings

Examples of the weights:AAA rated assets = 20%A rated assets = 50%BBB rated assets = 100%

Revised version March 2013 Ed Dolan’s Econ Blog

Page 14: What is basel iii and why should we regulate bank capital

Regulatory Capital vs. TCE

In short, under Basel II regulatory capital tended to understate the leverage of bank balance sheets

A bank might have tangible assets of 1,000,000 and tangible common equity of 20,000, giving a TCE ratio of 2%

The same bank might have risk-weighted assets of just 500,000 and regulatory capital of 50,000, giving a regulatory capital ratio of 10%

Data in this chart compare regulatory capital ratios to TCE ratios for banks in Europe and the US just before the 2008 financial crisis

Revised version March 2013 Ed Dolan’s Econ Blog

Page 15: What is basel iii and why should we regulate bank capital

Trying Again: Basel III

In an attempt to fix the problems of Basel III, regulators have reached a new agreement, known as Basel III

Proposed improvements include:A better measurement of capital, closer to

tangible common equity (but not exactly)Requirements for banks to build extra

capital reserves if early warning signs show abnormal credit growth or asset price bubbles

Building of The Bank for International SettlementsPhoto source: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:BIZ_Basel_002.jpg

Revised version March 2013 Ed Dolan’s Econ Blog

Page 16: What is basel iii and why should we regulate bank capital

Will Basel III Succeed?

Now the hard work has begun of translating the general principles of Basel III into specific regulations

Preliminary proposals were tough, but banks are lobbying hard to weaken them

Some observers are already starting to fear that Basel III regulations will once again be too easy on banks, laying the basis for another global financial crisis a few years down the road

Revised version March 2013 Ed Dolan’s Econ Blog