what kinds of assessments improve learning? dylan wiliam, ets

Download What kinds of assessments improve learning? Dylan Wiliam, ETS

If you can't read please download the document

Upload: sybil-golden

Post on 12-Jan-2016

219 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • What kinds of assessments improve learning?

    Dylan Wiliam, ETS

  • Raising achievement matters

    For individualsIncreased lifetime salaryImproved healthFor societyLower criminal justice costsLower health-care costsIncreased economic growth
  • Wheres the solution?

    StructureSmall high schoolsK-8 schoolsAlignmentCurriculum reformTextbook replacementGovernanceCharter schoolsVouchersTechnology
  • Its the classroom

    Variability at the classroom level is up to 4 times greater than at school levelIts not class sizeIts not the between-class grouping strategyIts not the within-class grouping strategyIts the teacher
  • Teacher quality:

    A labor force issue with 2 solutionsReplace existing teachers with better ones?No evidence that more pay brings in better teachersNo evidence that there are better teachers out there deterred by certification requirementsImprove the effectiveness of existing teachersThe love the one youre with strategyIt can be doneWe know how to do it, but at scale? Quickly? Sustainably?
  • The design challenge

    Key metric:Cost of buying one standard deviation of increased student achievementConstraintsSolution must be in principle scalable
  • Cost/effect comparisons

    InterventionEffect (sd)Cost/yrClass-size reduction(by 30%)0.1$24kIncrease teacher content knowledge by 1 sd0.1?Formative assessment/Assessment for learning0.2
  • Effects of formative assessment

    Several major reviews of the researchNatriello (1987)Crooks (1988)Black & Wiliam (1998)Nyquist (2003)All find consistent, substantial effects
  • Effects of feedback

    Kluger & DeNisi (1996)Review of 3000 research reportsExcluding those:without adequate controlswith poor designwith fewer than 10 participantswhere performance was not measuredwithout details of effect sizesleft 131 reports, 607 effect sizes, involving 12652 individualsAverage effect size 0.4, butEffect sizes very variable40% of effect sizes were negative
  • Kinds of feedback (Nyquist, 2003)

    Weaker feedback onlyKnowledge of results (KoR)Feedback onlyKoR + clear goals/knowledge of correct results (KCR)Weak formative assessmentKCR+ explanation (KCR+e)Moderate formative assessment(KCR+e) + specific actions for gap reductionStrong formative assessment(KCR+e) + activity
  • Effect of formative assessment (HE)

    NEffectWeaker feedback only310.16Feedback only480.23Weaker formative assessment490.30Moderate formative assessment410.33Strong formative assessment160.51
  • Feedback and formative assessment

    Feedback is information about the gap between the actual level and the reference level of a system parameter which is used to alter the gap in some way (Ramaprasad, 1983 p. 4)Formative assessment requiresdata on the actual level of some measurable attribute;data on the reference level of that attribute;a mechanism for comparing the two levels and generating information about the gap between the two levels;a mechanism by which the information can be used to alter the gap.
  • Formative assessment

    Frequent feedback is not necessarily formativeFeedback that causes improvement is not necessarily formative Assessment is formative only if the information fed back to the learner is used by the learner in making improvementsTo be formative, assessment must include a recipe for future action
  • Assessment for learning &
    formative assessment (Black et al., 2002)

    Assessment for learning is any assessment for which the first priority in its design and practice is to serve the purpose of promoting pupils learning. It thus differs from assessment designed primarily to serve the purposes of accountability, or of ranking, or of certifying competence. An assessment activity can help learning if it provides information to be used as feedback, by teachers, and by their pupils, in assessing themselves and each other, to modify the teaching and learning activities in which they are engaged.

    Such assessment becomes formative assessment when the evidence is actually used to adapt the teaching work to meet learning needs.

  • Feedback

    Feedback is therefore formative only if the information fed back is actually used in closing the gap.Three key instructional processesEstablishing where learners are in their learningEstablishing where they are goingEstablishing how to get there
  • Aspects of formative assessment

    Where the learner is goingWhere the learner isHow to get thereTeacherClarify learning intentionsEngineering effective discussionsProviding feedback that moves learners onPeerUnderstand/clarify criteria for successActivating students as instructional resources for one anotherLearnerUnderstand criteria for successActivating students as owners of their own learning
  • Five key strategies

    Clarifying and understanding learning intentions and criteria for successEngineering effective classroom discussions that elicit evidence of learningProviding feedback that moves learners forwardActivating students as instructional resources for each otherActivating students as the owners of their own learning
  • and one big idea

    Use evidence about learning to adapt instruction to meet student needs
  • Keeping Learning on Track (KLT)

    A pilot guides a plane or boat toward its destination by taking constant readings and making careful adjustments in response to wind, currents, weather, etc.Educational systems must do the same:Plan a carefully chosen route ahead of time (in essence building the track)Take readings along the way Change course as conditions dictate
  • Regulation of learning

    Teaching as engineering learning environmentsKey features:Create student engagement (pedagogies of engagement)Well-regulated (pedagogies of contingency)Long feedback cycles vs. variable feedback cyclesQuality control vs. quality assurance in learningTeaching vs. learningRegulation of activity vs. regulation of learning
  • Regulation of learning

    Proactive (upstream) regulationPlanning regulation into the learning environmentPlanning for evoking informationInteractive (downstream) regulationNegotiating the swiftly-flowing riverMoments of contingencyTightness of regulation (goals vs. horizons)Retrospective regulationStructured reflection (e.g., lesson study)
  • Types of formative assessment

    Long-cycleFocus: between unitsLength: four weeks to one yearMedium-cycleFocus: within units, between lessonsLength: one day to two weeksShort-cycleFocus: within lessonsLength: five seconds to one hour
  • Questioning in math: discussion

    Look at the following sequence:

    3, 7, 11, 15, 19, .

    Which is the best rule to describe the sequence?

    n + 4

    3 + n

    4n - 1

    4n + 3

  • Questioning in math: diagnosis

    In which of these triangles is a2 + b2 = c2 ?

    A

    a

    c

    b

    C

    b

    c

    a

    E

    c

    b

    a

    B

    a

    b

    c

    D

    b

    a

    c

    F

    c

    a

    b

  • Questioning in science: discussion

    Ice-cubes are added to a glass of water. What happens to the level of the water as the ice-cubes melt?

    The level of the water drops

    The level of the water stays the same

    The level of the water increases

    You need more information to be sure

  • Questioning in science: diagnosis

    The ball sitting on the table is not moving. It is not moving because:

    no forces are pushing or pulling on the ball.

    gravity is pulling down, but the table is in the way.

    the table pushes up with the same force that gravity pulls down

    gravity is holding it onto the table.

    there is a force inside the ball keeping it from rolling off the table

    Wilson & Draney, 2004

  • Questioning in English: discussion

    Macbeth: mad or bad?
  • Questioning in English: diagnosis

    Where is the verb in this sentence?

    The dog ran across the road

    A

    B

    C

    D

  • Questioning in English: diagnosis

    Where does the subject end and the predicate begin in this sentence?

    The dog ran across the road.

    A

    B

    C

    D

  • Questioning in English: diagnosis

    Which of these is a good thesis statement?

    The typical TV show has 9 violent incidents

    There is a lot of violence on TV

    The amount of violence on TV should be reduced

    Some programs are more violent than others

    Violence is included in programs to boost ratings

    Violence on TV is interesting

    I dont like the violence on TV

    The essay I am going to write is about violence on TV

  • Questioning in history: discussion

    In which year did World War II begin?

    1919

    1937

    1938

    1939

    1941

  • Questioning in History

    Why are historians concerned with bias when analyzing sources?

    People can never be trusted to tell the truth

    People deliberately leave out important details

    People are only able to provide meaningful information if they experienced an event firsthand

    People interpret the same event in different ways, according to their experience

    People are unaware of the motivations for their actions

    People get confused about sequences of events

  • Why research hasnt changed teaching

    Misunderstanding nature of teacher expertiseLeaving teachers to translate into practiceFailure to attend to both content and process
  • Klein & Klein (1981)

    Six video extracts of someone delivering cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR)5 of the videos are of CPR students1 of the videos is of an expert paramedicVideos shown to three groups:students, instructors and expertsSuccess rate in identifying expert:Experts: 90%Students: 50%Instructors: 30%
  • Teacher expertise (Berliner, 1994)

    Experts excel mainly in their own domainExperts often develop automaticity for the repetitive operations that are needed to accomplish their goalsExperts are more sensitive to the task demands and social situation when solving problems.Experts are more opportunistic and flexible in their teaching than novicesExperts represent problems in qualitatively different ways than novices.Experts have fast and accurate pattern recognition capabilities. Novices cannot always make sense of what they experience.Experts perceive meaningful patterns in the domain in which they are experienced.Experts begin to solve problems slower, but bring richer and more personal sources of information to bear on the problem that they are trying to solve.
  • Knowledge creation and transmission

    After Nonaka & Tageuchi, 1995

  • A model for teacher learning

    Content (what we want teachers to change)EvidenceIdeas (strategies and techniques)Process (how to go about change)Small stepsFlexibilityChoiceAccountabilitySupport
  • Discussion

    What are the implications of this research for publishers of formative assessment systems?
  • Questions?

    Dont forget to fill out your evaluations