what research tells us about reading instruction georgia’s reading first february 2005

83
What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

Upload: coby-dyes

Post on 01-Apr-2015

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction

Georgia’s Reading First

February 2005

Page 2: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

What is SBRR (and how can I get

some?)

Dr. Michael C. McKennaGeorgia Southern University

Page 3: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

prevents the use of unreliable and untested methods that can actually impede academic progress

makes teaching more effective, productive, and efficient

can be better generalized and replicated across many sites

Scientifically-Based Research

Page 4: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

Scientifically-Based Research

applies rigorous, systematic, and objective procedures to obtain valid knowledge relevant to reading development, reading instruction, and reading difficulties

Page 5: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

Scientifically-Based Research

employs systematic empirical methods that draw on observation or experiment;

Page 6: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

Scientifically-Based Research

involves rigorous data analyses that are adequate to test the stated hypotheses and justify the general conclusions drawn;

Page 7: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

relies on measurements or observational methods that provide valid data across evaluators and observers and across multiple measurements and observations;

and . . .

Scientifically-Based Research

Page 8: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

has been accepted by a peer-reviewed journal or approved by a panel of independent experts through a comparably rigorous, objective and scientific review

Scientifically-Based Research

Page 9: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

SBRR in a Nutshell

Scientific method Begins with hypothesis Controls are used Outcome proves or disproves the

hypothesis Replicated – Repeat studies find

the same results

Page 10: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

SBRR in a Nutshell

Generalized – Study findings represent truth for the general population.

Meets Rigorous Standards – Methods and conclusions must be confirmed by peer review.

Convergent findings – Conclusions are in line with findings from other studies.

Page 11: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

Horse Race Studies

Page 12: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

Important Documents

Preventing ReadingDifficulties in YoungChildren

Catherine E. Snow, M.Susan Burns, and PegGriffin, editors

National ResearchCouncil, 1998

Reading Research Summary

Page 13: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

Let’s look at the 5 Areas

Phonemic Awareness Phonics Fluency Vocabulary Comprehension

Page 14: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

NRP Findings on PA

PA training improves phonemic awareness PA training improves decoding PA training improves spelling PA training improves comprehension

Page 15: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

NRP Findings on PA

PA training works for preK, K, 1 and older disabled readers

PA training works with high- and low-SES children PA training does not improve spelling for reading-

disabled students

Page 16: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

NRP Findings on PA

PA training works in English and in other languages.

Many different activities can be used in the trainings; a focus on one or two skills appears more effective than more.

Blending and segmenting are most powerful.

Page 17: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

NRP Findings on PA

Overlearning letter names, shapes, and sounds should be emphasized along with PA training.

Between 5 and 18 hours yielded the strongest effects. Longer programs were less effective. (But the panel cautioned against making “rules” about time.)

Page 18: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

NRP Findings on PA

Regular classroom teachers can effectively implement the training

Small groups were more effective than whole class or tutoring

Page 19: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

Oddity Tasks Adding Sounds Deletion Tasks Sound Blending Stretch Sounding

Some Effective Techniques

Page 20: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

Elkonin Boxes

Page 21: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

Elkonin Boxes

Page 22: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

Elkonin Boxes

Page 23: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

Elkonin Boxes

Page 24: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

Elkonin Boxes

m a n

Page 25: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

Sound Sorting

Page 26: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

Sound Sorting

Page 27: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

Sound Sorting

Page 28: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

Sound Sorting

Page 29: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

Picture Blending

Page 30: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

Picture Blending

Page 31: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

Picture Blending

Page 32: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

Picture Blending

Page 33: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

Task #1LEA Reps Principals Literacy

Coaches

What steps have you taken to ensure that SBRR phonemic awareness instruction is occurring?

How have you supported your LC’s efforts to foster SBRR instruction in phonemic awareness?

To what extent are your teachers using SBRR strategies for teaching phonemic awareness?

Page 34: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

NRP Findings on Phonics

Systematic phonics instruction had a significant effect on children’s reading achievement compared to controls

Synthetic, larger-unit (onset-rime), and other phonics programs all were more effective than controls, but no one type of instruction or instructional program was significantly more effective than any other

Page 35: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

Synthetic Phonics

• Teach individual letter-sound correspondences in isolation.

• Have children sound out unfamiliar words by blending phonemes.

Page 36: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

cat = /k/ + /a/ + /t/

Page 37: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

Analogy-Based Decoding

• Teach children to recognize patterns (chunks) (e.g., -at, -ake).

• Teach key sight words containing these chunks (e.g., cat, make).

• Teach them to decode unfamilar words by recognizing chunks, recalling the key word, and substituting the onset they’ve just encountered.

Page 38: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

vatT: Let’s start with the vowel. Do you

see a part you know? S: Yes, at. T: Can you think of a word that has at? S: Yes, cat. T: So take off the c and put a v there. S: /v/ - /at/, /vat/!

Page 39: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

Stages of Decoding

• Prephonemic (just guessing, using the first letter at most)

Page 40: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

bird might be read as

ball

Page 41: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

Stages of Decoding

• Prephonemic (just guessing, using the first letter at most)

• Partial Alphabetic (some letter-sound knowledge is used.

Page 42: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

gem is read as gum

Page 43: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

Stages of Decoding

• Prephonemic (just guessing, using the first letter at most)

• Partial Alphabetic (some letter-sound knowledge is used)

• Full Alphabetic (left-to-right sequential decoding)

Page 44: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

cat = /k/ + /a/ + /t/

Page 45: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

Stages of Decoding

• Prephonemic (just guessing, using the first letter at most)

• Partial Alphabetic (some letter-sound knowledge is used)

• Full Alphabetic (left-to-right sequential decoding)

• Consolidated Alphabetic (orthographic) (onset and rime approach)

Page 46: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

band

bandiferous different

Page 47: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

band

bandiferous different

Page 48: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

band

bandiferous different

Page 49: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

NRP Findings on Phonics

Tutoring, small groups, and whole classes are all effective delivery systems for phonics instruction

Phonics instruction is more effective when it occurs in kindergarten and first grade than later

Page 50: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

NRP Findings on Phonics

Phonics instruction is effective for at-risk kindergarteners, at-risk first graders, and disabled students. The findings for older weak readers are confusing.

Phonics instruction improves students’ ability to read real words, pseudowords, and (to a lesser extent) irregular words.

Page 51: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

NRP Findings on Phonics

Phonics instruction improves reading comprehension in kindergarteners, first graders, and disabled readers, but not necessarily in older readers

Phonics instruction improves spelling in kindergarten and first grade, but not for older readers

Page 52: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

NRP Findings on Phonics

Phonics instruction is effective for children at different levels of SES

Phonics instruction was more effective than all forms of control groups (basal, whole language, whole word, regular curriculum).

Page 53: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

And here’s what the NRP said we don’t know about teaching phonics

How long should phonics instruction be Years? Minutes?

How many letter-sound relationships should be taught?

How can we maintain consistency in instruction and interest and motivation of teachers?

What is the role of teacher knowledge? How should teachers be trained to teach phonics?

Page 54: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

Task #2LEA Reps Principals Literacy

Coaches

What steps have you taken to ensure that SBRR phonics instruction is occurring?

How have you supported your LC’s efforts to foster SBRR instruction in phonics?

To what extent are your teachers using SBRR strategies for teaching phonics?

Page 55: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

Oral reading fluency

requires automatic recognition of most words

includes meaningful phrasing and emphasis (prosody).

Page 56: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

NRP Findings on Fluency

Fluency can be improved through instruction.

Guided oral reading activities and guided repeated oral reading activities improve fluency, at least through grade 5.

Repeated oral reading activities improve fluency for non-impaired students.

Page 57: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

And here’s what the NRP said we don’t know about teaching fluency

What kinds of guided oral reading improve fluency the most?

Are instructional techniques more effective at certain ages and abilities?

What is the impact of independent reading on fluency development?

Page 58: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

Let’s listen to some GARF students

Page 59: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

Reading First Cases

WCPM

Child 1 24

Child 2 60

Child 3 150I am so happy! I just found out I can be on the soccer team. We have our first practice on Saturday. . . .

Page 60: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

Guiding Principles of Teaching Fluency

Page 61: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

Do not assume that fluency instruction can be

leapfrogged.

Page 62: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

Practice, practice, practice!

Page 63: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

Maximize the time spent reading.

Page 64: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

Model fluent reading.

Page 65: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

Repeated Readings Partner Reading Partner Repeated Reading Readers’ Theater Echo Reading Choral Reading

Effective Fluency Methods

Page 66: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

Task #3LEA Reps Principals Literacy

Coaches

What steps have you taken to ensure that SBRR fluency instruction is occurring?

How have you supported your LC’s efforts to foster SBRR instruction in fluency?

To what extent are your teachers using SBRR strategies for teaching fluency?

Page 67: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

NRP Findings on Vocabulary

Teaching vocabulary improves general comprehension ability.

Preteaching vocabulary helps both word learning and comprehension of a selection.

Much vocabulary is acquired through incidental exposure.

Repeated exposures in a variety of contexts are important.

Page 68: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

NRP Findings on Vocabulary

A combination of definitions and contextual examples works better than either one alone.

Many instructional methods can be effective in teaching vocabulary.

Instructional methods should result in active engagement.

Both direct and indirect methods should be used.

Page 69: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

NRP Findings on Vocabulary

The more connections that are made to a word, the better the word tends to be learned.

Computer applications can be effective. The effectiveness of some instructional

methods depends on the age or ability of the children.

Page 70: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

What the NRP said they didn’t know about vocabulary instruction

What are the best ways to assess vocabulary? Which methods work best with students of

different ages and abilities? How can technology best be used to teach

vocabulary? How is vocabulary best integrated with

comprehension instruction? What combinations of instructional methods

tend to work best?

Page 71: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

Preteach key words to improve comprehension.

Page 72: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

Introduce new words in related clusters.

Page 73: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

Stress the connections among related terms.

Page 74: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

Provide more than definitions.

Page 75: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

Tie new words to old knowledge.

Page 76: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

Provide brief, periodic review.

Page 77: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

Some SBRR Techniques

Teacher Read-Alouds Graphic Organizers Semantic Maps (webs) Semantic Feature Analysis Other Charting Approaches List-Group-Label Possible Sentences Word Sorts

Page 78: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

Task #4LEA Reps Principals Literacy

Coaches

What steps have you taken to ensure that SBRR vocabulary instruction is occurring?

How have you supported your LC’s efforts to foster SBRR instruction in vocabulary?

To what extent are your teachers using SBRR strategies for teaching vocabulary?

Page 79: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

NRP Findings on Comprehension

Many approaches have some level of research evidence.

For example, stressing mental images and mnemonics can be effective.

But seven instructional approaches have a clear scientific basis.

Page 80: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

And here’s what the NRP said we don’t know about teaching comprehension

What are the best ways of teaching teachers? Does comprehension strategy instruction

transfer to content learning? Which strategies work best at which ages and

abilities? Do effective strategies work with all genres?

Page 81: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

1. Comprehension monitoring2. Cooperative learning3. Graphic and semantic organizers

(esp. those stressing text structure)4. Question answering5. Question generation6. Summarization7. Combinations of 1-6

Key Instructional Approaches

Page 82: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

Task #5LEA Reps Principals Literacy Coaches

What steps have you taken to ensure that SBRR comprehension instruction is occurring?

How have you supported your LC’s efforts to foster SBRR instruction in comprehension?

To what extent are your teachers using SBRR strategies for teaching comprehension?

Page 83: What Research Tells Us about Reading Instruction Georgia’s Reading First February 2005

Afternoon Agenda

12:45 - 1:05 Chapter 11:05 - 1:25 Chapter 21:25 - 1:45 Chapter 31:45 - 2:05 Chapter 42:05 - 2:15 Break2:15 - 2:35 Chapter 52:35 - 3:00 Q&A