8/14/2019 What We Dont Know Can Kill Us

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/what-we-dont-know-can-kill-us 1/2

What We Don't Know Can Kill Us

By Sally Morem

I bow to the harsh reality of human nature and freely admit that both science and

religion have proven to be quite dangerous in the past. Each seeks to explain, and in

some sense, measure and control human experience. And when they go wrong, they

can go horribly wrong. However, I’m going to take another tack. I believe that

religion is more dangerous than science, not because of what it does, but because of 

what it can’t do.

On April 26, 1803, villagers in L’Aigle, France watched horrified as 3,000 stones fellfrom the sky, pummeling the village rooftops. Scientists soon arrived to study the

rocks that were very similar to one another, yet very different from rocks found in

the surrounding countryside. What were they? Where did they come from? Had

the rocks been much larger than 20 to 30 pounds each, they could have posed a

serious threat to the village.

400 years ago, Europeans visualized the universe as an unchanging crystalline

sphere enfolding everything. Stars were the glory of God shining through holes in

that sphere. Planets, the Sun, and the Moon, circled Earth. Earth was at the center

of everything, truly God’s Theater in the Round.

But reports kept trickling in to European centers of learning about rocks from the

sky. Scientists themselves disregarded the evidence at hand because the existence of 

such rocks would imply that the heavens were not immutable. Both science and

religion remained faithful to the concept of cosmic stasis.

By the early 19th century, attitudes changed. The scientists at L’Aigle worked

through various possibilities. Studying 19 separate reports of meteorite falls in

Europe, they methodically eliminated various possibilities, such as

transubstantiation by lightning, combustion of atmospheric vapors, even the

northern lights. Finally, they were forced to conclude that meteorites wander

through the heavens until they’re captured by Earth’s gravitational field.

Almost 50 years ago, at age seven, I had my own run-in with objects from outside

our world. I attended a day camp for girls. We visited a retired farmer who, after

90 years, still remembered the day when a meteorite nearly struck the home he still

lived in. He showed us the boulder that had fallen from the sky. He let each of us

handle a fragment of that meteorite. I nearly dropped it, startled by its unexpected

weight.

8/14/2019 What We Dont Know Can Kill Us

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/what-we-dont-know-can-kill-us 2/2

Years later during my space development activist days, I helped set up a poster

display that included meteorite cross sections. I fingered the smoothness of the

embedded nodules of pure copper, finally fully grasping both the danger and the

opportunity represented by the meteor’s density.

Until the 1990s, we didn’t know how much real danger we were in. Earth had been

spared from collisions with large asteroids and comets for so long that anxiety over

the prospect seemed pointless. However, astronomers recently discovered the

existence of over a thousand planet-killer asteroids that regularly intersect Earth’s

solar orbit. A collision with a Texas-sized asteroid isn’t necessary to doom all life on

Earth. Just a single-kilometer-wide rock will do the trick.

Fragments of Comet Shoemaker-Levi slammed into Jupiter in 1994, opening up

gaping holes in it atmosphere. I watched the bombardment on television, awestruck 

as nature demonstrated the devastating power of kinetic energy delivered at high

velocity. One fragment blasted Jupiter with a fireball larger than Earth. Had it hithere, our planet would’ve been vaporized.

Science may one day guide the development of technologies able to stop killer

asteroids and comets, vaporizing them with giant focusing mirrors, nudging them

out of the way with solar sails, and mining their valuable ores while moving them

into a safe orbit with mass drivers. Science sparks technologies that lead to

knowledge, feeding back into the development of new science.

This process of learning by picking one’s way through rock fields of uncertainty has

much to recommend it. It mates human intelligence and limitations, creativity and

traditionalism, and curiosity and ignorance to produce an explanatory system of 

nature with unsurpassed predictive power.

Religion could never help gather the evidence required for us to concede that

asteroids and comets are leftover detritus of the birth of our Solar System. Religion

would certainly never suggest that these objects can use our planet for target

practice at any time. Why? Religion can only preserve received knowledge. It is

forbidden by its core doctrines from engaging in the work of discovery.

Faith is not enough. What we don’t know can kill us. Religion keeps us from

learning and knowing. Therefore, it’s more dangerous than science.