what we know about the impact of hiv/aids on teachers: a gerneral overview
DESCRIPTION
What we know about the Impact of HIV/AIDS on Teachers: a gerneral overview. From Peter Badcock-Walters, Christopher Desmond, Daniel Wilson & Wendy Heard 4 June 2003. Study Objective. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
What we know about the Impact of HIV/AIDS on Teachers: a gerneral
overviewFrom Peter Badcock-Walters, Christopher Desmond, Daniel Wilson
& Wendy Heard
4 June 2003
Study Objective • Benchmark the mortality rate amongst in-
service educators in KZN by age and gender
to inform future educator demand and supply
planning and modelling.
Method• Analysis of Annual School Survey data
• 100-school random sample survey to
investigate non-reporting by 90% schools
• Analysis of PERSAL records
• Reconciliation/analysis of trends & outcomes
Education & HIV Context • Largest provincial system with 2,6 million
learners & 76000 educators, in 6000 schools;
• Demand: Enrolment in Grade 1 shows only
1,9% growth over 5 years, 1998 - 2002;
• Supply: Educator attrition (all causes) greater
than decline in demand – 6,8% in 1999 of
which 0,64% estimated to be AIDS mortality;
• Educators vulnerable to high rates of HIV
prevalence (35%+) over several years;
• Growing mortality in Private Sector increasing
recruitment of educators from the system.
Prevalence rates
Ante Natal Clinics
Schools
HIV Prev. as %
Data: Annual School Survey
Change in Grade 1 enrolment
0
50000
100000
150000
200000
250000
300000
350000
400000
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Years
Gra
de 1
enr
olm
ent
+3%
-12%
-24%
+20%
+27%
Study Method • Identification of available KZNDEC data;
• Analysis of Annual School Survey, capturing
educator & learner mortality since 1999;
• Commissioning/analysis of 100-school
random sample survey to check undercount/
non-reporting by 90% of schools;
• Analysis of Personnel Salary (PERSAL) system
data from 1996;
• Reconciliation and analysis of observed
contradictions, trends and likely impact.
Age Distribution of Educators Age distribution of Educators, 2000 - All schools
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55+ Agenot
StatedAge Group
Educ
ator
s
Female Male
Analysis: Annual School Survey
• Only 8% schools in 1999 reported educator mortality – 92% balance unknown;
• Reported 509 deaths (424/83% due to illness) in cohort of 68 615 publicly-paid educators = gross mortality rate of 0,74%;
• 11% of schools in 2000 reported 650 deaths (580/ 89% due to illness) in cohort of 67 958 educators = gross mortality rate of 0,96%;
• Mortality rate for male educators higher in 1999 (1,12% vs 0,56%) and in 2000 (1,4% vs 0,76%) than for females;
• 68% of educators female, average age 37,4.
AS Data: Mortality due to Illness
Educator Mortality due to illness, 1999 - 2000
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
20 – 24 25 – 29 30 – 34 35 – 39 40 – 44 45 – 49 50 – 54 55+
Age Group
Educ
ator
s
1999 2000
AS Data: Mortality by Gender
* Female mortality in age band 30-34 rose by 70% 1999 to 2000, and by 30% for those 35-40;
* Gross number of female deaths rose from 327 to 354 (+8%) versus 253 to 300 (+19%) for males;
* Percentage females dying from illness grew from 89% to 92% versus 78% to 84% for males.
Female mortality due to illness
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
20 – 24 25 – 29 30 – 34 35 – 39 40 – 44 45 – 49 50 – 54 55+
Age Group
1999 2000
Male mortality due to iIlness
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
20 – 24 25 – 29 30 – 34 35 – 39 40 – 44 45 – 49 50 – 54 55+
Age group
1999 2000
Analysis: Personnel Salary Records
• PERSAL apparently most reliable data but suffers average reporting lag of 4,3 months;
• 1998-2001 shows 84% to 87% deaths due to illness/natural causes;
• 1998: mortality rate for males peaked at 1,2% 35-39, averaging 0,9%, while female rate peaked at 0,8% 30-34, averaging 0,5%. Total mortality rate for 1998 = 0,6%
• 1998 PERSAL total deaths 493, 70% in age group 25-39;
• Average age of educators at death 36,6.
Analysis: PERSAL 1999• 1999: PERSAL shows 530 deaths in cohort of
71084 vs 509 in 1999 Annual Survey data;
• 1999 mortality rate for males peaked at 1,3% 35-
39, averaging 1,1%, while females peaked at
0,7% 30-34 averaging 0,6%. Total rate = 0,7%;
• 68% deaths 25-39; average age at death 36,5. Educator Mortality, PERSAL 1999
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55+
Age Group
Ed
ucato
rs
Female Males
Analysis: PERSAL 2000• 2000: PERSAL shows 681 deaths in cohort of
68615 vs 654 in 2000 Annual Survey data;
• 2000 mortality rate for males peaked at 1,6% 30-
34, averaging 1,5%, while females peaked at
1,1% 30-34 averaging 0,8%. Total rate = 1,0%;
• 67% deaths 25-39; average age at death 36,9. Educator Mortality, PERSAL 2000
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55+
Age Group
Ed
ucato
rs
Female Males
Analysis: PERSAL 2001• 2001: PERSAL shows 609 deaths in cohort of
67958; there is no Annual Survey data as yet;
• 2001 mortality rate for males peaked at 1,8% 50-
54, averaging 1,3%, while females peaked at
0,8% 30-39 averaging 0,7%. Total rate = 0,9%;
• 64% deaths 25-39; average age at death 37,8. Educator Mortality, PERSAL 2001
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55+
Age Group
Ed
ucato
rs
Female Males
Analysis: Sample Survey 1999
• Initiated 100-school random sample survey to explain/resolve 90% non-reporting issue;
• Shows only 24% schools kept viable records;
• Raises doubts about school data quality;
• 1999: Showed 4 extra deaths and 1 duplication vs 12 captured via AS and PERSAL; of actual total 16, sample school principals ‘neglected’ to report 12 deaths but analysis also shows AS undercount of 8;
• Sample educator cohort of 1843 suggests gross mortality rate of 0,87% for 1999.
Analysis: Sample Survey 2000
• 2000: Showed 3 extra deaths and 9
duplications vs 15 captured via AS and
PERSAL; of actual total 18, sample school
principals only ‘neglected’ to report 6 deaths
but again also shows AS undercount of 7;
• Sample educator cohort of 1903 in 2000
suggests mortality rate of 0,94%;
• Direct consequence of survey evidence of
record keeping failure may be introduction of
monthly data capture via the DEMMIS system
piloted in 200 schools over 24 months.
Outcomes: Mortality Trends
• 90%-93% all educator deaths 1998-2001 <49;
• 2124 educators of 2313 dying 1998-2001 <49;
• 80%+ of this <49 group (1700) died of illness;
• Mortality 3-times higher than without AIDS.
Total Mortality by Age Group - KwaZulu-Natal 1998 - 2001
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
220
240
20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55+Age Group
Tota
l
1998 Total 1999 Total
2000 Total 2001 Total
Outcomes: Convergent Trends
• The three data sets show fairly convergent trends and patterns in 1999, with real convergence in 2000;
• In 1999, the Annual Survey suggests a gross mortality rate of 0,66%, PERSAL 0,88% and the sample survey 0,89%;
• In 2000, the Annual Survey suggests a gross mortality rate of 0,96%, PERSAL 1,0% and the sample survey 0,94%;
• Additional data for 2001 from PERSAL suggests a slight drop back to 0,9%.
Outcomes: Post-Service Mortality?
• Mortality rates used are for in-service educators only;
• Studies of SA corporate sector suggest up to 50% of employees die after leaving service;
• Further PERSAL analysis suggests that large numbers of educators (average age 47) are indeed leaving on medical grounds;
• Must assume that in-service mortality is only a portion of the real rate, and undercounts real number of educators dying;
• Research will continue to attempt to establish this position.
Lessons and Conclusions
• Establishing rates of mortality should not require this volume of research and analysis, and suggests the lack/failure of MIS;
• The complexity of PERSAL attrition data requires extensive further analysis
• There can no longer be any doubt that AIDS is impacting educators, who are dying at 3-4,5 times the expected rate without AIDS;
• HIV/AIDS are adding to existing levels of attrition and dysfunction and impacting on teaching, learning, quality and outcomes – impacts that must be adequately measured.
Educator Mortality in KwaZulu Natal
A Consolidated Study of In-Service Impact and Trends
Thank You for your Attentionenquiries: [email protected]