what’s next for the bay area office market?...q3 02 q4 03 q1 05 q2 06 q3 07 q4 08 q1 10 q2 11 q3...
TRANSCRIPT
What’s next for the Bay Area office market?Economic and real estate outlook for 2017
February 2017
1.
3.
U.S. economy will record another strong year, perhaps outpace 2016
• Full employment will drive wage growth
• Fed will temper inflation with interest rate increases
Bay Area growth cooling to more sustainable levels
• Housing market flattening, providing some relief, but still unaffordable for most
• Fundamentals on solid footing in each major market, but tempered growth ahead
U.S. economy expected to outpace 2016 growth; Bay Area
poised for another solid year
San Francisco Office 44
2.New administration’s impact will be a mixed bag
• Infrastructure spending and deregulation will boost economic growth
• Immigration and trade reform are top concerns for Bay Area economy
Macroeconomic trends
and the impact of the
new administration
For the second consecutive month, unemployment rose on the
back of increasing participation; now stands at 4.8 percent
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
-1,000
-800
-600
-400
-200
0
200
400
600
Unemployment rate (%)
1-month net change (thousands)
Monthly employment change Unemployment rate
Source: JLL Research, Bureau of Labor Statistics
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
Unemployment rate for bachelor’s degree holders (%)
Unemployment for bachelor’s degree holders remains at a
cyclical low of 2.5 percent
Source: JLL Research, Bureau of Labor Statistics
Wage growth dipped to 2.5 percent from a cycle high of 2.8
percent in December, but continues to outpace rising inflation
Source: JLL Research, Bureau of Labor Statistics
-3%
-2%
-1%
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
12-month % change
Hourly wage growth CPI growth
The “Trump Bump”* - what should you know?
*coined by Ken Rosen, Chairman of the Fisher Center for Real Estate and Urban Economics
Good• Infrastructure spending• Business tax cuts• Pullback on regulations
• Infrastructure spending• Business tax cuts• Pullback on regulations
Not so good
• Trade proposals• Immigration reform• Trade proposals• Immigration reform
Bay Area economic,
demographic and
housing trends
2.6%
2.7%
2.7%
2.8%
3.2%
3.2%
3.5%
3.5%
3.9%
4.2%
0.0% 1.0% 2.0% 3.0% 4.0% 5.0%
Oakland
Orange County
Las Vegas
Atlanta
San Fran/San Mateo
Denver
Seattle
Austin
Fort Lauderdale
Dallas
12-month % change
Bay Area slips from top 10 employment growth markets, 2016
Bay Area’s robust employment gains will taper through 2021
-250
-200
-150
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
200
Thousands
Bay Area expected to add 65,000 jobs annually through 2019, slowing to 11,000
annually in 2020-21
Source: JLL Research, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Moody’s
Source: JLL Research, CA Department of Finance, Census
Bay Area net migration boosted by immigration patterns
An average of 86 people moved into the Bay Area
each day in 2016
This is down from 121 per
day in 2015 and a high of
143 per day in 2012
Immigration reform would have a substantial impact on the Bay Area economy and slow demand for
housing
Rapid population growth and net migration were driven by booming tech economy; slowing tech expansion and low affordability will curb trend but Bay Area will continue to lead
-30,000
-20,000
-10,000
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Population growth is fueled by immigration; domestic migration contracting in response to high cost of living
Domestic migration Immigration
Least-affordable housing markets in 2016
Source: JLL Research, BLS QCEW survey, Rosen Consulting Group
Average wages include all benefits, stock options, and meals provided; inflation adjusted using annual change in CPIAffordability is the share of households able to afford a median-priced single family home assuming 20% down, current mortgage rates, and allocating no more than 35% of total income to housing costs.
Advanced employment industries driving wealth creation, yet
single family homes prices are well beyond reach for most
$0
$20,000
$40,000
$60,000
$80,000
$100,000
$120,000
$140,000
San Francisco East Bay Peninsula Silicon Valley United States
Inflation-adjusted average annual wages are up significantly in the Bay Area, outpacing U.S. in all markets
2001 2008 Today
+17.9% since 2001
+8.9% since 2001
+22.5% since 2001
+17.9% since 2001
+7.9% since 2001
San Francisco, CA 19.3%
Honolulu, HI 19.5%
Salinas, CA 19.6%
San Jose, CA 22.3%
Santa Barbara, CA 22.4%
Orange County, CA 23.5%
Santa Rosa, CA 26.4%
San Diego, CA 27.1%
Los Angeles, CA 27.8%
Ventura, CA 29.7%
Oakland, CA 30.3%
New York, NY 32.1%
Seattle, WA 40.5%
Miami, FL 42.7%
Fort Lauderdale, FL 44.4%
Vallejo, CA 45.2%
Denver, CO 46.5%
West Palm Beach, FL 46.6%
Inland Empire, CA 46.6%
Portland, OR 47.3%
12
194,040New Bay Area HHs 2010-15
133,068New residential permits 2010-15
Source: JLL Research, Census, Moody’s
Bay Area household formation levelling off, permits pick up
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
2,350,000
2,400,000
2,450,000
2,500,000
2,550,000
2,600,000
2,650,000
2,700,000
2,750,000
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Permitting activity is struggling to keep pace with new household formation
Households (left axis)
Total units permitted (right axis)
3:5Only three residential permits have been pulled for every 5 households
formed in the last five years
13Source: JLL Research, Yardi Matrix
New supply concentrated near transit and urban centers36,054 units are either planned or under construction throughout the Bay Area
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
2012
2014
2016
2018f
Multifamily completions peak in 2017
Historical average: 4,718 units annually
U.S. office market
trends
U.S. leasing activity dips, but still healthy
30,000,000
35,000,000
40,000,000
45,000,000
50,000,000
55,000,000
60,000,000
65,000,000
70,000,000
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Leasing activity (s.f.)
Total leasing activity (s.f.) 4-quarter moving average (s.f.)
Although slightly slower than Q2 and Q3, Q4 saw a healthy 56.1 m.s.f. of leasing activity
Source: JLL Research
Tech remains the leader in total U.S. leasing activity in Q4,
even as the industry faces a talent shortage
1,060,760
1,091,269
1,185,646
1,228,820
1,493,676
1,504,276
2,162,539
2,464,638
3,026,617
8,050,896
0 1,000,000 2,000,000 3,000,000 4,000,000 5,000,000 6,000,000 7,000,000 8,000,000 9,000,000
Other professional services
Accounting and consulting
Health
Life sciences
Coworking/real estate
Media and entertainment
Law firm
Government
Finance
Tech
Leasing activity (s.f.)
Source: JLL Research – leasing activity > 20,000 s.f.
Slower leasing and give-backs as a result of relocations to
new supply pushed down U.S. net absorption in Q4
-5,000,000
0
5,000,000
10,000,000
15,000,000
20,000,000
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Quarterly net absorption (s.f.)
Source: JLL Research
Net absorption by market over time: Sun Belt markets taking
absorption share from tech markets
Source: JLL Research – light grey represents remaining markets
9,142,438
4,611,340
12,369,604
279,789
15,420,058
21.9%Tech
0.7%NYC/ DC
11.0%Sun Belt
0.0%Energy
2016
29.6%Diverse
20142012
12,753,090
3,170,589
5,875,838
16,315,899
8,366,896
8,609,523
23.1%Tech
15.2%NYC/ DC
5.8%Sun Belt
10.7%Energy
29.6%Diverse
10,565,544
2,439,7984,413,42
1
11,523,886
36.5%Tech
0.0%NYC/ DC
8.4%Sun Belt
15.2%Energy
39.8%Diverse
Despite slowing, U.S. overall rent growth will remain
positive as high-priced blocks come to the market this year
-6.0%
-4.0%
-2.0%
0.0%
2.0%
4.0%
6.0%
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Quarterly rent growth (%)
Source: JLL Research
Industry hubs continue to surpass the U.S. market as a
whole in terms of rent growth
7.2%
7.4%
7.5%
7.6%
7.8%
9.3%
10.3%
13.1%
14.7%
17.0%
17.9%
6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16% 18% 20%
San Mateo (SF Peninsula)
Hollywood (Los Angeles)
Austin CBD
East Cambridge (Boston)
Uptown (Dallas)
Central Perimeter (Atlanta)
South Financial District (SF)
Playa Vista (Los Angeles)
Close-In Eastside (Portland)
Greenwich Village (New York)
Oakland CBD
Year-over-year rent growth (%)
Source: JLL Research
TECH
TECH
TECH
TECH
TECH
PROF. SERVICES
FINANCE/LAW
LIFE SCIENCES
TECH
MEDIA
TECH
Consistent rental growth and increasing volumes of new
supply are moving markets along the cycle
Source: JLL Research
Peakingphase
Fallingphase
Risingphase
Bottomingphase
Houston
Columbus, Fort Lauderdale, Indianapolis,Orlando, Pittsburgh, Sacramento, St. Louis
Detroit, Hartford, West Palm Beach
San Francisco Peninsula, Silicon Valley
Charlotte, Jacksonville, Oakland-East Bay, Richmond
Oakland, Fort Worth, Nashville
Dallas, San Francisco
Denver
Baltimore, Long Island
Orange County
Miami, New York, Portland, Raleigh-Durham
Atlanta, Austin, Los Angeles, Seattle-Bellevue, Tampa
Boston, Cleveland
Milwaukee, Phoenix
Hampton Roads, Philadelphia, Westchester County
Chicago, Minneapolis, Salt Lake City, United States
North Bay
Cincinnati, Fairfield County, Louisville, San Antonio
Washington, DC
New Jersey
Bay Area office market
trends
1,370,828
-89,711
-2,274,049
98,983
1,844,888 1,589,817 1,399,651 1,906,734 2,149,790
864,099
$42.12 $39.45 $31.37 $35.99
$43.39 $51.58
$56.88$62.93
$68.74 $73.65
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
9.5%12.5%
15.3%17.1%
14.6%11.8% 11.1% 9.8%
8.2% 8.2%
Total net absorption
Total vacancy rate
Direct average asking rent ($ p.s.f.)
76.3 million s.f.Inventory
5,879,830 s.f.Under construction
$75.69Class A average direct asking rate
$68.97Class B average direct asking rate
16Buildings with vacant blocks
greater than 50,000 s.f.
31Active tenant requirements greater than 50,000 s.f.
San Francisco – Q4 2016 market profile
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
55%
60%
$- $1 $2 $3 $4 $5 $6 $7 $8 $9 $10
Q195
Q296
Q397
Q498
Q100
Q201
Q302
Q403
Q105
Q206
Q307
Q408
Q110
Q211
Q312
Q413
Q115
Q216
($ Billions) Investment Volume
Percentage of U.S. Investment Volume
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
$0
$10,000
$20,000
$30,000
$40,000
$50,000
$60,000
$70,000
1995 1999 2003 2007 2011 2015
IPOsVC, millions
High-Tech Venture CapitalFunding
Technology IPOs
Controlled VC investment continues, totals $1.73B in Q3 2016
Bay Area captures 38 percent of US investment but activity slows US Tech VC funding and IPOs
Local impact:Venture capital funding
creates new jobs, which
creates new demand for
office space
Recent Bay Area IPOs:Recently funded San Francisco companies
$555.5M
$65.0M
$181.0M
$60.0M
$153.1M
25
Source: JLL Research
Sublease availabilities decline amidst targeted leasing activity
throughout 2016
San Francisco Office
0
500,000
1,000,000
1,500,000
2,000,000
2,500,000
3,000,000s.f. Sublease Space s.f.
26
Source: JLL Research
Future development pipeline mitigates current risk of significant
over supply
San Francisco Office
0
500,000
1,000,000
1,500,000
2,000,000
2,500,000
3,000,000
3,500,000
2016 2017 2018 2021
86%of 100,000 square feet
availabilities are on
new construction
1
45
2
3
1
4
5
2
3
The zoning and land use changes will increase the amount of potential development for residential, commercial and office development. The existing growth versus estimated potential growth is outlined below:
5M633,000 s.f.Forest CityEntitled
Flower Mart2,020,777 s.f.Kilroy RealtyPre-Application
598 Brannan700,456 s.f.
Tishman SpeyerPending Allocation
88 Bluxome368,550 s.f.
Alexandria/TMGPre-Application
725 Harrison730,940 s.f.
Boston PropertiesPre-Application
Central
Subway
Harrison
Folsom St
Howard St
Mission St
Townsend St
Brannan St
Bryant St4
thS
t
Residential (s.f.) Jobs
Existing 2,500 10,000
Potential under Plan 5,000 35,000
Total Growth potential 2,500 25,000
Central SOMA
Boundary
Central SOMA redevelopment zone will usher in the next wave
28
Source: JLL Research
Sales volumes surpass 2015, totaling almost $5 billion
San Francisco Office
Foundry IIIBuyer: ARASeller:Tishman
Price p.s.f.: $1,202Price: $350,000,000
High Watermark 2016 Sales
$0
$1
$2
$3
$4
$5
$6
$7
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Sales volume ($ billions)
The PiersBuyer: Invesco
Seller: Waterfront PartnersPrice p.s.f.: $1,100Price:$90,800,000
760 MarketBuyer: Patrick HotungSeller: Thor EquitiesPrice p.s.f.: $1,255Price: $374,000,000
503,468 232,487
-1,629,017 -1,876,923
1,748,107
3,706,404
1,867,931 2,311,989 2,891,738
1,524,963
$25.32$31.44 $30.84 $30.96 $31.80 $32.64
$38.88 $41.28 $42.39$47.84
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
17.1%21.9%
26.4% 23.7%21.3%
17.1% 15.4% 13.8% 12.2% 12.4%
Total net absorption
Total vacancy rate
Direct average asking rent ($ p.s.f.)
69.8 million s.f.Inventory
7,972,955 s.f.Under construction
$51.04Class A average direct asking rate
$42.71Class B average direct asking rate
39Buildings with vacant blocks
greater than 50,000 s.f.
29Active tenant requirements greater than 50,000 s.f.
Silicon Valley – Q4 2016 market profile
30
Source: JLL Research
Quarterly absorption negative for first time in 23 quarters, but
future move-ins will boost trend in 2017
San Francisco Office
-500,000
0
500,000
1,000,000
1,500,000
2,000,000
Q2 11 Q4 11 Q2 12 Q4 12 Q2 13 Q4 13 Q2 14 Q4 14 Q2 15 Q4 15 Q2 16 Q4 16
31
Source: JLL Research
Sublease starting to creep up in Silicon Valley, driven by M&A
and movement into new construction
San Francisco Office
0
500,000
1,000,000
1,500,000
2,000,000
2,500,000
3,000,000
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
32
Source: JLL Research
Office investment cooled but increase expected in 2017
San Francisco Office
$.0
$1.0
$2.0
$3.0
$4.0
$5.0
$6.0
$7.0
$8.0
Q3 12 Q4 12 Q1 13 Q2 13 Q3 13 Q4 13 Q1 14 Q2 14 Q3 14 Q4 14 Q1 15 Q2 15 Q3 15 Q4 15 Q1 16 Q2 16 Q3 16 Q4 16
Rolling 12 mo. sales volume ($B)
22.8%
17.9%
23.2%
15.9% 15.1% 16.1%18.8% 17.7%
15.2%11.2%
15.7% 14.2% 14.4%12.3% 11.9%
13.7% 12.4%10.3%
7.5%3.2%
Total net absorption
Total vacancy rate
Direct average asking rent ($ p.s.f.)
24,496,701 s.f.Inventory
260,000 s.f.Under construction
$55.04CBD Class A direct asking rate
$49.67CBD Class B direct asking rate
8Buildings with vacant blocks
greater than 50,000 s.f.
4Active tenant requirements greater than 50,000 s.f.
Oakland Metro– Q4 2016 market profile
$24.08 $26.76 $26.00 $26.41 $26.00 $27.37 $26.91 $29.87
$36.16 $39.22 $25.08 $27.24 $28.34 $26.81 $27.12 $28.56 $29.88 $33.84
$45.05 $53.12
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Total Oakland Metro CBD Only
2,010
-27,404 -105,822 -133,226
248,319
-251,392
20,051
521,999
1,146,139
459,138
Tenant relocations or expansions into Oakland
Tenant Size (SF) Former market New Address
Uber Technologies
330,000 San Francisco 1955 Broadway
The Gap 180,000 San Francisco RosewoodCommons
Brown & Toland 60,000 San Francisco 1221 Broadway
TchoChocolates
50,000 San Francisco 3100 San Pablo Ave
WCIRB 41,000 San Francisco 1221 Broadway
Sierra Club 38,776 San Francisco 2101 Webster
Del Monte Foods
27,000 San Francisco 3003 Oak Rd
Gensler 24,500 San Francisco 2101 Webster
Gordon & Rees 24,200 San Francisco 1111 Broadway
State of CA 24,000 San Francisco 1111 Broadway
Tenants look to the sunny side of the bay for rent relief
Architecture/Engineering5%
Consumer Products20%
Financial Services6%
Healthcare15%Legal
7%
Non-Profit10%
Professional Services6%
Technology27%
Architecture/Engineering Consumer Products Education
Financial Services Healthcare Legal
Manufacturing/Construction Non-Profit Other
Professional Services Technology
35
Source: JLL Research
Spillover demand driving rent growth in CBD-adjacent markets
San Francisco Office
11.0%
15.1%
17.9%
18.8%
25.1%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%
Berkeley
Alameda-South
Oakland-CBD
Emeryville
Alameda-North
36
Source: JLL Research
Robust investment activity drove new high watermark in 2016
San Francisco Office
$418
$315
$243
$345
$193
$425
$160
$440$408
$376
$288
$324
$0
$150
$300
$450
$600
COPYRIGHT © JONES LANG LASALLE IP, INC. 2015
Thank you!
37