what’s so funny about social justice? s · just finished richard wright’s black boy, a student...

6
48 English Journal 107.6 (2018): 48–53 e author argues for the use of humorous texts to help students develop critical reading/viewing skills and to promote social justice issues. Bruce Goebel What’s So Funny about Social Justice? S ome years back, after my class had just finished Richard Wright’s Black Boy, a student said to me, “The only appropriate response to all the readings you’ve given us is suicide.” While I knew he was joking, I was still taken aback. We had read wonderful, powerful books— Beloved, Fools Crow, The Kite Runner— and it saddened me that ul- timately, these books might simply leave students depressed rather than moved. In his introduction to Hokum: An Anthology of African American Humor, poet and novelist Paul Beatty relates a similar expe- rience he had as a student: For a black child like myself who was impover- ished every other week while waiting for mother’s bimonthly paydays, giving me a copy of I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings was the educational equivalent of giving the prairie Indians blankets laced with smallpox or putting saltpeter in a sail- or’s soup. I already knew why the caged bird sings, but after three pages of that book I now know why they put a mirror in the parakeet’s cage, so he can wallow in his own misery. After this traumatic experience I retreated to my room to self-medicate with Clavell, Irving Wambaugh, the Green Lan- tern, Archie and Jughead; it would be ten years before I would touch another book written by an African American. (7) So, what if the literacy and social justice work we are trying to do via literature is being foiled by its often tragic seriousness? What if the emotion work students are being asked to do when engaging with such literature is debilitating for some of them? One might argue that many students’ reluctance to read and their lack of success at reading may often be rooted in the bleak literary landscapes we ask them to visit. One possible response to this problem is a turn toward humor. According to Claudia Cor- nett, student interest in particular reading mate- rial accounts “for 30 times the variance in reading success,” and while tragic literature may be off- putting, “humor provokes interest” (16). Which isn’t to say we stop teaching more somber litera- ture, but perhaps we might change things up with a little social justice humor and provide some comic relief along the way. Whether we are looking at classical Greek satire, Jonathan Swift, or the more contemporary works of authors from Mark Twain to Langston Hughes, humorous texts do serious work. If our goals include helping students recognize, respond to, and redress even subtle forms of bias, discrim- ination, and inequity, as Paul Gorski and Katy Swalwell suggest (37), social justice humor is an extremely useful tool, since such humor doesn’t merely engage in feel-good multiculturalism but rather explicitly identifies and challenges bias and corresponding inequities. Humor has always been at the forefront of progressive change, and is uniquely suited to influence its audience. As Ojib- way stand-up comedian Don Kelly notes, “Humour is a fantastic communication device. If you yell at people, or browbeat them into submission, they’ll tune out and walk away. But if you can keep them laughing, they’ll keep listening. People who would

Upload: others

Post on 11-Mar-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: What’s So Funny about Social Justice? S · just finished Richard Wright’s Black Boy, a student said to me, “The only appropriate response to all the readings you’ve given

48 English Journal 107.6 (2018): 48–53

The author argues for the use of humorous texts to help students develop critical reading/viewing skills and to promote social justice issues.

Bruce Goebel

What’s So Funny about Social Justice?

S ome years back, after my class had just finished Richard Wright’s Black Boy, a student said to me, “The only appropriate response to

all the readings you’ve given us is suicide.” While I knew he was joking, I was still taken aback. We had read wonderful, powerful books— Beloved, Fools Crow, The Kite Runner— and it saddened me that ul-timately, these books might simply leave students depressed rather than moved. In his introduction to Hokum: An Anthology of African American Humor, poet and novelist Paul Beatty relates a similar expe-rience he had as a student:

For a black child like myself who was impover-ished every other week while waiting for mother’s bimonthly paydays, giving me a copy of I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings was the educational equivalent of giving the prairie Indians blankets laced with smallpox or putting saltpeter in a sail-or’s soup. I already knew why the caged bird sings, but after three pages of that book I now know why they put a mirror in the parakeet’s cage, so he can wallow in his own misery. After this traumatic experience I retreated to my room to self- medicate with Clavell, Irving Wambaugh, the Green Lan-tern, Archie and Jughead; it would be ten years before I would touch another book written by an African American. (7)

So, what if the literacy and social justice work we are trying to do via literature is being foiled by its often tragic seriousness? What if the emotion work students are being asked to do when engaging with such literature is debilitating for some of them?

One might argue that many students’ reluctance to read and their lack of success at reading may often be rooted in the bleak literary landscapes we ask them to visit.

One possible response to this problem is a turn toward humor. According to Claudia Cor-nett, student interest in particular reading mate-rial accounts “for 30 times the variance in reading success,” and while tragic literature may be off- putting, “humor provokes interest” (16). Which isn’t to say we stop teaching more somber litera-ture, but perhaps we might change things up with a little social justice humor and provide some comic relief along the way.

Whether we are looking at classical Greek satire, Jonathan Swift, or the more contemporary works of authors from Mark Twain to Langston Hughes, humorous texts do serious work. If our goals include helping students recognize, respond to, and redress even subtle forms of bias, discrim-ination, and inequity, as Paul Gorski and Katy Swalwell suggest (37), social justice humor is an extremely useful tool, since such humor doesn’t merely engage in feel- good multiculturalism but rather explicitly identifies and challenges bias and corresponding inequities. Humor has always been at the forefront of progressive change, and is uniquely suited to influence its audience. As Ojib-way stand- up comedian Don Kelly notes, “Humour is a fantastic communication device. If you yell at people, or browbeat them into submission, they’ll tune out and walk away. But if you can keep them laughing, they’ll keep listening. People who would

EJ_July_2018_B.indd 48 7/8/18 3:18 PM

chartman
Text Box
Copyright © 2018 by the National Council of Teachers of English. All rights reserved.
Page 2: What’s So Funny about Social Justice? S · just finished Richard Wright’s Black Boy, a student said to me, “The only appropriate response to all the readings you’ve given

49English Journal

Bruce Goebel

never walk into a lecture on Native history will walk into a comedy club” (59). For an example of this choice in the classroom, I might— on the one hand— say to my students, “Today we’re going to look at how Western charities use oral and visual rhetoric that intentionally stereotype the people of Africa as always impoverished and always in need of Western help.” A few of my students may show some interest. Most will likely yawn at the prospect of yet another one of their teacher’s PC journeys. But, instead, I start with the spoof music video “Af-rica for Norway— New Charity Single Out Now!” which parodies groups such as Band Aid who un-intentionally create negative stereotypes of Africa, only in this video it is freezing Norwegians needing Africa’s help (SAIH). With this humorous piece and others like it,1 I capture their attention, broaden their understanding of a more diverse Africa, and allow them to explore an issue of media bias in a humorous way that they’ll not only remember but also likely share with friends.

In this sense, humor can be a kind of Trojan horse, getting a hostile audience to open doors, or minds, in ways they wouldn’t in a more direct conversation. For this reason, humor can motivate those readers and listeners who might otherwise be resistant to conversations about social justice. And there’s the added benefit that those “who find a message funny are also more likely to pay closer attention to the message, yet are less motivated to argue against its substance” (Nabi et al. 40). So hu-morous texts can both alleviate the emotional ten-sion of some students and open the minds of others.

Challenges of Teaching Humor

However, there are a number of challenges in teach-ing humorous texts. First is the fact that humor as a rhetorical tool can be equally effective in a regres-sive way as it is in a progressive way. As psycholo-gist Rod A. Martin points out, humor can be used to “reinforce stereotypes or to shatter prejudices, to resolve conflict in relationships or to avoid deal-ing with problems, to convey feelings of affection and tolerance, or to denigrate and express hostil-ity” (150). Addressing this problem requires two things. The teacher must carefully select humor texts that are progressive in intentions and unlikely

to be grossly misread, and students need to learn how to distinguish between positive humor, espe-cially humor that is doing the social justice work of breaking down stereotypes and challenging inequi-ties, and negative humor that attempts to reinforce stereotypes and place a targeted person or group in an inferior social position.

The second challenge that humorous texts present for teachers arises from the fact that the language of humor is almost always unstable. Pol-ysemy, the coexistence of multiple meanings for a word or phrase, allows readers and listeners to in-terpret most texts in various ways— thus the rich possibilities for classroom conversations about liter-ature. However, humor’s reliance on such things as irony, parody, and word play makes it particularly prone to wide differences in interpretation. And, as any teacher knows who has taught a literary text heavy with irony, many students just don’t get it. Rather than recognizing the ironic intentions, they interpret it as literal. Thus, while an author might intend a passage to be an ironic, progressive critique, a student may read it as a literal, regressive state-ment. For example, in Lau-rie Halse Anderson’s Speak, the protagonist uses a head-ing “Our Teachers Are the Best” (6), which could be read literally unless stu-dents pick up on the ironic cues that suggest that Melinda means something quite different. The sim-ple solution to the problem of polysemy in humor is to give students a bit of prereading guidance about the author’s intentions. Anderson does exactly this within her novel when she states specifically “The First Ten Lies They Tell You In High School” (5) before listing a series of ironic statements. But not every humorous text comes with such help, so to be safe, teachers need to provide it. In addition, since understanding how humor works is one of the goals, it is important to set a reading purpose of uncovering how the author uses humor strategies to achieve a rhetorical goal. In other words, they need to approach humor with the same critical attention they might give to any literary text.

For students to recognize how an author is manipulating readers, they will need to be familiar

Humor can motivate

those readers and

listeners who might

otherwise be resistant

to conversations

about social justice.

EJ_July_2018_B.indd 49 7/8/18 3:18 PM

Page 3: What’s So Funny about Social Justice? S · just finished Richard Wright’s Black Boy, a student said to me, “The only appropriate response to all the readings you’ve given

What’s So Funny about Social Justice?

50 July 2018

certain aspects of Iranian culture and using humor to defuse misconceptions. Ultimately the piece is a celebration of kindness and an expression of sad-ness that politics has altered Americans’ ability to see Iranian immigrants for who they are. Students might consider such questions as: What misconcep-tions do the Americans depicted in the story have about Iranians? What might be the origins of these misconceptions? How does Dumas use dramatic irony and other humor strategies to address these misconceptions? How might the effect of some of those strategies differ from when she used them as a child and when she uses them as an author of this piece? What does she want her readers to under-stand about her family and Muslim immigrants?

From there we move on to Maz Jobrani’s TED talk, “Did You Hear the One about the Iranian- American?” As you might know, the TED Talks come with downloadable scripts, so this can be both a viewing and reading activity. In this eight- minute stand- up comedy routine, Jobrani humorously ex-plores the problematic nature of being an American of Iranian descent: “it causes a lot of inner conflict, you know, like part of me likes me, part of me hates me. Part of me thinks I should have a nuclear pro-gram, the other part thinks I can’t be trusted with one.” He offers a number of illustrations about how

with some of the primary humor strategies that authors use— our third challenge. Perhaps more so than any other mode of writing, humor is for-mulaic. Authors use the same strategies repeatedly, even within the same text, and readers never seem to tire of them. It would be helpful in any critical exploration of humor if students were familiar with at least the sample of terms included in the sidebar.

Sample Unit

Short pieces of social justice humor can be used as one- off breaks in between more somber texts to lighten the emotional burden on students, they can be paired with tragic texts, and they can be shaped into a short unit that works collectively toward a progressive goal. For example, a broad learning tar-get for a short humor unit might be to help stu-dents understand the problem in the United States of bias toward and stereotyping of Muslims and people of Middle Eastern descent. It might be use-ful here to introduce to students the notion of “defi-cit theory,” the ways in which unequal treatment of a group is justified by stereotypical portrayals of supposed intellectual or ethical deficiencies (Gorski 518). As students explore the various humor pieces, they can watch for the ways in which the authors reject these deficit theories and both implicitly and explicitly argue for more equitable treatment.

Typically, it’s best to start with the most transparent texts, those that are least susceptible to misreading, and then work toward more ambigu-ous and complicated pieces of humor, with the idea that the earlier pieces will aid students in a more competent reading of the later ones. So, we’ll start with the short chapter “With a Little Help from My Friends” from Firoozeh Dumas’s delightful, funny memoir Funny in Farsi: A Memoir of Grow-ing Up Iranian in America. This piece focuses on her childhood experiences with neighbors and ele-mentary school classmates repeatedly making false assumptions about Iranians. For example, one boy keeps asking whether she owned a camel back in Iran. Since he refuses to take no for an answer or accept that they had a Chevy, she tells him “yes, we had camels, a one- hump and a two- hump. The one- hump belonged to my parents and the two- hump was our family station wagon” (33– 34). Dumas al-ternates throughout the piece between explaining

LITERARY TERMS RELATED TO HUMOR

Incongruity – placing two unalike things together for comic effect; typically, a pattern will be set and then an incongruous element will disrupt that pattern. Reversal – setting up audience expectations with a recognizable character type or situation, then violat-ing those expectations with a contradictory conclusion. Parody – imitating the form, style, or content of an earlier text for comic effect.Verbal Irony – saying one thing but meaning another.Dramatic Irony – revealing to the reader, or some character, something that one or more of the char-acters do not know so as to alter the meaning of what a character says or does. Exaggeration – intensifying some aspect of a charac-ter or a condition, relying not so much on incongru-ity for its effect as much as on distortion.Self-Deprecation – using any of the strategies listed above to describe and make fun of oneself or a group to which one belongs. Satire – pointing out the hypocrisy of a target group in humorous ways.

*See Humor Writing: Activities for the English Classroom for more information on humor strategies.

EJ_July_2018_B.indd 50 7/8/18 3:18 PM

Page 4: What’s So Funny about Social Justice? S · just finished Richard Wright’s Black Boy, a student said to me, “The only appropriate response to all the readings you’ve given

51English Journal

Bruce Goebel

not all Middle Easterners are the same, for example, how he as an Iranian American is treated differently in Kuwait than he is in Dubai. And he illustrates the bias that he faces as an actor:

But a lot of times in Hollywood, when cast-ing directors find out you’re of Middle Eastern descent, they go, “Oh, you’re Iranian. Great. Can you say ‘I will kill you in the name of Allah?’” “I could say that, but what if I were to say, ‘Hello. I’m your doctor?’” They go, “Great. And then you hijack the hospital.” Like I think you’re missing the point here.

Overall, this routine reaffirms much the same ar-gument as the Dumas piece, but using a decidedly different set of humor strategies (including the stand- up technique of stating a premise and then acting out a scene— “they go”— that illustrates that premise). Students can examine each segment of the routine and identify Jobrani’s implied argument: What stereotype or misunderstanding is he try-ing to address? How does he try to complicate and expand notions of identity? What kinds of humor strategies does he use to do this? How effective do you think those strategies are?

We can further broaden the way in which students are thinking about Muslim Americans by including Masoon Zayid’s TED Talk, “I Got 99 Prob-lems and Palsy Is Just One.” Zayid is a Palestinian

American female stand- up comedian who has cerebral palsy. Her humorous, self- deprecating talk explores both her ethnicity and her disability in a way that forces viewers to acknowledge the complexity of identity and the absurdities of bias, such as when she was turned down for a part as a charac-ter with CP because the di-rector didn’t think she could “do the stunts,” to which she responded, “Excuse me, if I can’t do the stunts, neither can the character.” There’s an opportunity here to talk with students about how, for some people, certain limited as-

pects of their identities are all anyone else sees when, in fact, everyone is comprised of a complex intersec-tion of identity markers— with gender, religion, eth-nicity, and disability all being in play in this video clip. How does Zayid construct her identity through this routine; in other words, what different aspects of her identity does she address? Which aspects seem most important to her? She knows that most people are uncomfortable with disabilities; how does she use self- deprecating humor to get them to accept her as more fully human? How does this piece complicate our understanding of Americans of Middle Eastern descent?

The next two sets of humorous texts address a couple of specific “complaints” about Muslims: that they are inherently angry people and that they don’t denounce terrorism. The first requires a bit of set- up. On the cover of its September 17, 2012, magazine, Newsweek intentionally chose a provoc-ative and prejudiced image that perpetuated the idea that all Muslims are characterized by anger. The magazine invited the usual vitriolic social media comments by asking for comments with the hashtag #MuslimRage. What they received in response from many in the Muslim commu-nity was humor, not anger. To introduce the con-troversy, show students the article “Newsweek’s ‘Muslim Rage’ Cover Draws Angry Protest” from Huffington Post (Mirkinson). This article offers a

iStock.com/Ridofranz

EJ_July_2018_B.indd 51 7/8/18 3:18 PM

Page 5: What’s So Funny about Social Justice? S · just finished Richard Wright’s Black Boy, a student said to me, “The only appropriate response to all the readings you’ve given

What’s So Funny about Social Justice?

52 July 2018

responses. For example, characters in the panel say such things as the following:

• I denounce terrorism! Now can we talk about the culinary merits of Panda Express?

• I denounce terrorism! I also denounce people who never fill the paper tray.

Students might consider: What is the implied ar-gument in these comics; what exactly does Farsad want readers to understand? Is her approach ef-fective? How might such a response be applied to other contexts?

The final humor piece for students to exam-ine is The Qu’osby Show, a parody of The Cosby Show created by Aasif Mandvi, best known as a corre-spondent on The Daily Show. This fake sit- com of-fers an exaggerated, ironic take on what Muslims would have to do to be at least partially accepted in America. It simultaneously reveals and critiques the assimilationist pressures that certain Americans feel. As with any ironic text, it would be best to clue students to the fact that Mandvi isn’t repre-senting American Muslims as they are, but rather is creating a caricature based on the fear that anti- Muslim prejudice in American culture perpetuates. Students might consider: What aspects of Muslim culture (stereotypical or otherwise) does the video address? How are these perceived by mainstream culture? How are exaggerations and reversals used in the parents’ response to each of these? There are a couple of opportunities for extension here. First, students might consider Uzma Kolsy’s claim that “in its effort to address years of misunderstand-ing, the [Qu’osby] show risks further cementing the very stereotypes it’s ostensibly trying to de-construct.” This returns us to the double- edged sword of humor’s polysemy and provides a chance for students to debate the progressive usefulness of humor that is inherently unstable in its effect. In addition, this fake sit- com is also a parody of the way in which The Cosby Show largely erased many cultural notions of Blackness as opposed to the way the more recent sit- com, Black- ish, addresses these cultural differences head on. A comparison of a Cosby Show episode and a Black- ish episode along-side the Qu’osby Show parody would allow students to explore the broader pressures to erase difference in the United States.

straightforward critique of Newsweek’s choice to run this cover and the ethical consequences surrounding that choice. Follow that up with NPR’s “‘Muslim Rage’ Explodes on Twitter, But in a Really Funny Way (Yes, Really)” (Chappell). This piece includes some of the humorous responses to #MuslimRage, including the following:

• I’m having such a good hair day. No one even knows. #MuslimRage— Hend (retweeted 2,900 times)

• Lost your kid Jihad at the airport. Can’t yell for him. #MuslimRage— Leila (retweeted 1,000 times)

• When you realize that if you have a 5 o’clock shadow it can be deemed a security threat. #MuslimRage— Taufiq Rahim

Students can consider first the rhetorical choice that these responders made. How are the authors of these tweets reframing the argument? Where are they using ironic humor or reversals? What do they want us to understand about certain aspects of life as a Muslim? We could extend this with a look at “13 Powerful Images of Muslim Rage” (Read), which of-fers an ironic series of images of people in love, play-ing with their children, and building a snowman.

The second complaint, that Muslims don’t denounce terrorism sufficiently, might also need a little contextualizing. In fact, most Muslims, in-cluding the vast majority of Imams in the United States, denounce terrorism— but such denuncia-tions seldom make the news since news organiza-tions know that ratings are driven by violence and anger, not reason and logic. This complaint about the lack of denunciation, in and of itself, is an inter-esting rhetorical strategy meant to discredit if not dehumanize, and we can see it playing out in the way in which Black Lives Matter spokespeople are continually asked by conservative media why they don’t denounce Black on Black violence— as though Black communities weren’t working against such violence all the time. In response to this kind of complaint, Negin Farsad, a stand- up comedian and filmmaker (The Muslims Are Coming), created the website The Daily Denouncer: Your Average Muslim Denouncing Terrorism Five Days a Week and Taking Weekends Off, which features single- panel comics that work in a similar vein as the #MuslimRage

EJ_July_2018_B.indd 52 7/8/18 3:18 PM

Page 6: What’s So Funny about Social Justice? S · just finished Richard Wright’s Black Boy, a student said to me, “The only appropriate response to all the readings you’ve given

53English Journal

Bruce Goebel

Conclusion

Given that our anthologies seldom include humor-ous literature, and the whole- class collections of books available to us rarely do either, except that hilarious Lord of the Flies, if humor is going to find a place in the classroom, individual teachers will need to seek out funny texts that are still doing important work. Whether in the form of novels and memoirs, such as Dumas’s Funny in Farsi and Paul Beatty’s brilliant, if too linguistically authentic, satirical coming- of- age novel, The White Boy Shuffle, or short stories such as Langston Hughes’s “Who’s Passing for Who” and Pat Griffith’s “Diamonds, Dykes, and Double Plays,” or poems such as Gary Soto’s “Mex-icans Begin Jogging” and Denice Frohman’s “Dear Straight People,” or even selected episodes from Black- ish or The Simpsons, there is a wealth of good humor pieces that can motivate students as critical readers, listeners, and viewers who recognize and re-spond to inequity when they see it. Social justice can be a laughing matter.

Note

1. See the Rusty Radiator website for comparative examples of

biased advertisements and parodic responses. Web search

“White Savior Barbie” for a related spoof and “White Savior

Industrial Complex” for information about why the approach

of many Western charities toward Africa is problematic.

Works Cited

Anderson, Laurie Halse. Speak. Puffin Books, 1999. Beatty, Paul. “Introduction.” Hokum: An Anthology of Afri-

can American Humor, edited by Paul Beatty, Blooms-bury, 2006, pp. 1– 16.

Chappell, Bill. “‘Muslim Rage’ Explodes on Twitter, But in a Funny Way (Yes, Really).” NPR, 17 Sept. 2012, www.npr.org/sections/thetwo- way/2012/09/17/161 315765/muslim- rage- explodes- on- twitter- but- in- a- funny- way- yes- really.

Cornett, Claudia. Learning through Laughter— Again. Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation, 2001.

Dumas, Firoozeh. Funny in Farsi: A Memoir of Growing Up Iranian in America. Random House, 2003.

Farsad, Negin. The Daily Denouncer. 6 Sept. 2016, medium .com/the- daily- denouncer.

——— . “A Highly Scientific Taxonomy of Haters.” TED Talks. Feb. 2016, www.ted.com/talks/negin_farsad_ a_highly_scientific_taxonomy_of_haters.

Goebel, Bruce. Humor Writing: Activities for the English Classroom. NCTE, 2011.

Gorski, Paul. “Good Intentions Are Not Enough: A Decol-onizing Intercultural Education.” Intercultural Educa-tion, vol. 19, no. 6, 2008, pp. 515– 25.

Gorski, Paul, and Katy Swalwell. “Equity Literacy for All.” Educational Leadership, vol. 72, no. 6, 2015, pp. 34– 40.

Jobrani, Maz. “Did You Hear the One about the Iranian- American?” TED Talks. Jul. 2010, www.ted.com /talks/maz_jobrani_make_jokes_not_bombs.

Kelly, Don. “And Now, Ladies and Gentlemen.” Me Funny. Edited by Drew Hayden Taylor, Douglas & McIn-tyre, 2005, pp. 51– 65.

Kolsy, Uzma. “The Qu’osby Show.” The Atlantic. 29 Apr. 2015, www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive /2015/04/the- quosby- show/391778/.

Mandvi, Aasif. “The Qu’osby Show— The Pilot.” The Daily Show with Jon Stewart. 17 Feb. 2011, www.cc.com /video- clips/dbhhse/the- daily- show- with- jon- stewart- exclusive— the- qu- osby- show— the- pilot.

Martin, Rod A. The Psychology of Humor: An Integrative Approach. Elsevier, 2007.

Mirkinson, Jack. “Newsweek’s ‘Muslim Rage’ Cover Draws Angry Protest.” Huffington Post. 17 Sept. 2012, www .huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/17/newsweek- muslim- rage- cover_n_1890124.html.

Nabi, Robin, et al. “All Joking Aside: A Serious Investiga-tion into the Persuasive Effect of Funny Social Issue Messages.” Communication Monographs, vol. 74, no. 1, 2007, pp. 29– 54.

Read, Max. “13 Powerful Images of Muslim Rage.” Gawker. 17 Sept. 2012, gawker.com/5943828/13- powerful- images- of- muslim- rage.

SAIH. “Africans for Norway— New Charity Single Out Now.” YouTube. 16 Nov. 2012, www.youtube.com /watch?v=oJLqyuxm96k.

Zayid, Masoon. “I Got 99 Problems and Palsy Is Just One.” TED Talks. Dec. 2013, www.ted.com/talks/may soon_zayid_i_got_99_problems_palsy_is_just_one.

Bruce Goebel, a former secondary English teacher, now teaches in the Department of English at Western Washington Uni-versity, where he offers courses on humor, American literature, young adult literature, and English teaching methods; he can be reached at [email protected]. He has been an NCTE member since 1991 and is the author of two NCTE books: Humor Writing: Activities for the English Classroom and Reading Native American Literature: A Teacher’s Guide.

READWRITETHINK CONNECTION Lisa Storm Fink, RWT

In “Literary Parodies: Exploring a Writer’s Style through Imitation” students analyze the features of a poet’s work and then create poems based on the original model. Students analyze sample poems and their parodies, focusing on the language and style of the original writer. They then write their own parody of the poem. http://bit.ly/2cyglru

EJ_July_2018_B.indd 53 7/8/18 3:18 PM