where we are and where we might be going · cawi cati paper mixed mode laptop capi mcapi 2006 2007...
TRANSCRIPT
TRENDS IN MARKETING RESEARCH TECHNOLOGY
Where we are
and where we might be going
Pat Molloy, Confirmit
Tim Macer, meaning ltd
CASRO 14TH TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE, NEW YORK, MAY 28/29 2009
- 2 -
AGENDA
!! Introductions
!! Background to the Study
!! The Sample
!! Detailed Findings
!! Current and predicted activity
!! Technology trends and challenges
!! Software usage and attitudes
!! Mixed Mode
!! Deliverables, tables and reports
!! Conclusions & Implications
!! Questions
- 3 -
INTRODUCTIONS
!! Pat
!! Tim
- 4 -
BACKGROUND TO STUDY
!! 5th Annual study, started in March 2004
!! Commissioned by Confirmit, carried out by
meaning ltd
!! Core set of questions across time augmented by
additional topical material
!! Data collected online using Confirmit
!! Read more ...
!!http://www.meaning.uk.com/news/news037.html
!!http://www.confirmit.com/pdf/
2008ConfirmitAnnualMRSoftwareSurvey.pdf
!!http://www.quirks.com/articles/2009/20090509.aspx?
searchID=28204061&sort=4
- 5 -
SAMPLE COMPOSITION
!! 215 completes
!! 27 Countries represented in 2008
!! Sample drawn by region (based on ESOMAR
turnover figures)
!! Mixture of technical specialists (20%),
researchers (39%) and operations/business
(41%)
!! Survey available in English, French, German,
Japanese
- 6 -
SAMPLE COMPOSITION
Total Small Co’s Medium Co’s Large Co’s
Total 215 100% 119 100% 25 100% 46 100%
North America 89 41% 44 37% 25 50% 20 44%
Europe 94 44 % 61 51% 16 32% 17 37%
Pacific Rim 32 15 % 14 12 % 9 18% 9 20%
THE QUESTIONNAIRE
THE QUESTIONNAIRE
THE QUESTIONNAIRE
- 9 -
CURRENT AND PREDICTED ACTIVITY
!! Chart 1.1, 1.2 – Quant v. Qual, Modes
!! Charts 1.3 – Mode by volume
!! Chart 1.4 – Predicted changes
!! Chart 1.5 – Industry challenges
QUANTITATIVE VS. QUALITATIVE
71% 69% 72% 72%
69% 69%
78%
22% 25%
21% 20% 24% 22%
14%
7% 6% 8% 7% 7% 9% 8%
Total Americas Europe Asia/Pac Small Co's Medium
Co's
Large Co's
Quantitative Research Qualitative Research Other
Research activities undertaken: %volume at each company
- 11 -
DATA COLLECTION MODES CITED (PENETRATION)
94% 94% 94% 94%
67%
75%
64%
53% 51% 51% 51%
53%
45% 45% 43%
50%
24%
16%
33%
19%
4% 2%
5% 3%
Total North America Europe Asia/Pac
Web CATI Paper Mixed Mode CAPI SMS
Percentage of market research firms using each mode of data
collection
- 12 -
THE GROWTH OF ONLINE RESEARCH (1)
Source: ESOMAR (global estimates)
13% 16% 17% 19%
30%
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Online research: % of all quantitative MR by spend
- 13 -
THE GROWTH OF ONLINE RESEARCH (2)
Source: Confirmit/meaning surveys 2006-2008
40.0% 43.0% 47.5%
2006 2007 2008
Online research: % of all quantitative MR by volume
- 14 -
RESEARCH MODES BY VOLUME
0.1%
0.2%
0.6%
1.0%
1.7%
3.9%
4.2%
14.0%
26.3%
47.5%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%
SMS
Mobile web
IVR
mobile CAPI
Mixed mode,
other
Large form CAPI
Mixed CATI+web
Paper
CATI
Web
- 15 -
WHO’S DOING SMS SURVEYS?
3.7%
11.1%
2.5% 1.9% 2.2%
5.3% 3.1%
All Large
co's
Medium
co's
Small
co's
North
America
Europe Asia Pac
- 16 -
RESEARCH MODES TRENDS (BY VOLUME)
40%
27%
21%
7% 5%
0.0%
43%
25%
19%
6% 5%
1.8%
48%
26%
14%
6% 4%
1.0%
CAWI CATI Paper Mixed mode laptop CAPI mCAPI
2006 2007 2008
- 17 -
GROWTH IN QUANTITATIVE METHODOLOGIES
38%
17%
1%
1%
2%
2%
4%
4%
5%
13%
Don't know/ nothing
Other
Max-Diff
Video Options
CATI
Cell/mobile phones
Analysis/segmentation
Operational changes
Hybrid methods
Internet based research
Source: RIT 2008 (Top 2 box, 5pt scale)
- 18 -
PREDICTED CHANGES IN INTERVIEWING MODE
1.2 1
1.2 1.2 1.1
1.3 1.1
0.5 0.5 0.5
0.2 0.4 0.4
0.7
0.4 0.3
0.4 0.4 0.3
0.5 0.4
0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2
0.1 0.1 0.3
-0.3 -0.2 -0.2
-0.5
-0.2 -0.4
-0.3 -0.5
-0.4 -0.6
-0.7
-0.4
-0.8
-0.5
Total North
America
Europe Asia/Pac Small co's Medium Co's Large co's
CAWI Mixed mode mCAPI laptop CAPI CATI Paper
Predicted growth or decline in volumes by mode
(+2 = major growth; +1 = modest growth; 0 = no change; -1 = any decline)
- 19 -
INDUSTRY CHALLENGES FOR TECHNOLOGY What are the most urgent challenges facing the research industry
that technology should address or attempt to resolve?
6%
19%
26%
27%
28%
31%
40%
42%
57%
3%
5%
8%
8%
10%
9%
15%
13%
25%
Other
High costs due to high level of technical skill
Alternative sources of data, knowledge and
consulting
High costs due to labor intensive processes
Time to conduct research and deliver results
Making results accessible to decision makers
‘Professional’ respondents
Availability of sample
Falling response rates
Main issue
All issues
- 20 -
TECHNOLOGY TRENDS AND CHALLENGES
!! Picture here
TECHNOLOGY CHALLENGES
7%
18%
23%
27%
47%
47%
47%
57%
3%
7%
5%
8%
13%
18%
20%
26%
Other
Handling trackers
Moving questionnaires to other technology
platforms
Moving data to other technology platforms
Creating custom websites for results
Recruiting/retaining people to use the
software
Keeping up to date with developments
Automating repetitive tasks
main issues All issues
“What are the key technology challenges that you and your business
face in the next two years?”
CATI DIALING AUTOMATION
24%
28%
37%
36%
40%
36%
Present
Future
Predictive dialing Autodialing Manual dialing
Proportions by each method in the current year (2008) and anticipated
proportions over the coming year. Mean average of those who do CATI
work.
CATI DIALING AUTOMATION
24 %
9 %
12 %
18 %
24 %
41 %
42 %
Other reasons
Not compatible with telephone system
Not compatible with CATI software
Too complicated for our needs
Too costly to install or operate
Savings unlikely due to types of typical call
Concerns over making nuisance calls
What are your reasons for not making greater use of
predictive dialing?
WEB 2.0
13 %
15 %
7 %
11 %
22 %
17 %
9 %
12 %
11 %
14 %
13 %
34 %
49 %
47 %
47 %
44 %
43 %
38 %
29 %
26 %
34 %
31 %
21 %
11 %
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Presenting questions in
video format
Still images from
respondents
Video clips from
respondents
Co-creation tools
Bulletin boards and blogs
Tools to analyze
unstructured text
1. Already do 2. Need but find difficult 3. May want in future 4. Not required
“[Of these] capabilities that software developers could build directly into web
survey tools to provide support for these methods, how important is each
capability to you?”
- 25 -
PLACEHOLDER
!! Slide here about communities
- 26 -
SOFTWARE USAGE AND ATTITUDES
!! Picture here
THE CULTURE OF OWN-DEVELOPED SOFTWARE
83% 80% 80%
91%
26% 29%
35% 29%
19% 24% 25%
15%
CATI CAPI Web Analysis
Any packaged in use Any own developed in use
Own-developed only
The origin of software in use at each organization
- 28 -
PLATFORM LOYALTY
49% 44% 42%
26% 34% 40%
25% 22% 18%
2006 2007 2008
Yes
Not sure
No
Are you considering changing the software you are using for your
data collection, data processing, data analysis, reporting or panel management in the next one to two years?
- 29 -
PLATFORM LOYALTY (2)
10%
23%
23%
24%
27%
Panel management
Data processing
Data analysis
Data collection
Report publishing and delivery
What software are you considering changing?
- 30 -
REASONS FOR CHANGING SOFTWARE
1.! Seeking more flexibility, more
capabilities or better functionality
2.! To achieve efficiency improvements through
increased automation
3.! Move to a more modern platform
4.! Consolidate all activities on a single integrated platform
5.! Dissatisfaction or concerns with the existing software
6.! To reduce software or IT costs
7.! Seeking something that is easier to use
8.! Company policy reasons
9.! Concerns with existing supplier
- 31 -
MIXED AND MULTI MODE/CHANNEL
!! Picture here
- 32 -
CURRENT SUPPORT FOR MIXED MODE RESEARCH
Total
North
America Europe
Asia
Pacific
Integrated platform 50% 45% 63% *
Switch between different
platforms 50% 55% 38% *
*low base size
Do you use an integrated software platform for your
multimode interviewing, or do you need to switch between
different software platforms to combine modes?
- 33 -
MIXED MODES
27%
27%
38%
35%
51%
49%
40%
40%
21%
24%
23%
25%
2008
2007
2006
2005
Common authoring Mixed modes in parallel Multi-mode with switching
Level of multimode software capability required in your data
collection software
- 34 -
REASONS FOR MIXED MODE RESEARCH What are your reasons for doing mixed mode research?
5%
1%
0%
2%
13%
10%
6%
28%
34%
9%
4%
15%
17%
33%
35%
38%
60%
68%
Other
It looks good in proposals
Shorten fieldwork times
Increase capacity of your fieldwork resources
Client requires mixed method
Reduce fieldwork costs
More respondent friendly
Improve sample coverage or sample
representation
Improve response rate
All reasons
Main reason
- 35 -
IMPORTANCE OF MIXED MODE SUPPORT
27%
31%
29%
6% 3% 4%
Essential: an absolute
“must have”
Very important: a serious
lack if not available
Moderately important: could
live without it
Fairly unimportant: no
immediate plans to use
Unimportant: not something
we wish to do
Don't know
If you were choosing new software, or reviewing your current
solution, how much importance would you place on the tool's ability to mix and combine different data collection modes?
- 36 -
DELIVERABLES, TABLES AND REPORTS
!! Picture here
- 37 -
3-YEAR TRENDS IN DISTRIBUTION MODES
20%
11%
48%
30%
23%
27%
15%
10%
48%
20%
14%
21%
28%
12%
49%
18%
11%
23%
Online static
reports
Interactive
analysis
MS PowerPoint MS Word Printed tabs Acrobat PDF
2006 2007 2008
“What percentage of projects currently involves the following
deliverables or distribution methods to the client?”
- 38 -
THE ROLE OF THE PRINTED CROSS-TAB REPORT
When considering analysis and reporting tools for the future, how important
is it that these should be able to produce volumes of cross-tabular reports?
59% 57%
27% 28%
13% 13%
1% 2% 0%
25%
50%
75%
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Essential
Moderately important
Relatively unimportant
Not something future
tools should provide
- 39 -
DEMAND FOR ONLINE RESULTS DELIVERY “Over the next year to what extent do you anticipate an increased
demand for the following…?”
30%
18%
21%
51%
47%
51%
19%
34%
27%
Fixed reports online
Clients create
analyses online
Information portals
Major increase Modest increase No increase
- 40 -
FUTURE WISHES FOR ANALYSIS/REPORTING TOOLS When considering analysis and reporting tools for the future, where
should software developers be concentrating their efforts?
7%
10%
10%
14%
21%
38%
32%
34%
43%
44%
59%
74%
Better tools to distribute static reports to end-
users
Better script- or syntax based cross-tab
reporting tools
Better tools to create information portals and
research libraries
Better desktop or PC-based analytical tools
(which work offline)
Better online analytical tools that work in a
web browser
Better tools to automate the production of
charts and PowerPoint decks
All wishes
Main wish
- 41 -
CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS
- 42 -
QUESTIONS ?
!! Read more ...
!!http://www.meaning.uk.com/news/news037.html
!!http://www.confirmit.com/pdf/
2008ConfirmitAnnualMRSoftwareSurvey.pdf
!!http://www.quirks.com/articles/2009/20090509.aspx?searchID=28204061&sort=4