who is benjamin bloom? bloom developed the “taxonomy of cognitive objectives.” in the 1950’s,...
TRANSCRIPT
Who is Benjamin Bloom?
• Bloom developed the “Taxonomy of Cognitive Objectives.”• In the 1950’s, the taxonomy was developed by Benjamin Bloom, a
professor at University of Chicago. Model was finalized in 1956.• The model is a means of expressing qualitatively different kinds of thinking.• The model has been adapted for classroom use as a planning tool.• It continues to be one of the most universally applied reasoning models.• It provides a way to organize thinking skills into six levels, from the most basic to the higher order levels of thinking.• 1990s- Lorin Anderson (former student of Bloom) revisited the taxonomy.• As a result, a number of changes were made for the 2001 model.
HIGHER LEVEL THINKING ORDER:Kicking Up Your Level of Critical Thinking
Benjamin Bloom’s Taxonomy of Thinking
BENJAMIN BLOOM’S TAXONOMY OF THINKING
LEVEL TEACHER ROLE STUDENT ROLE HOW DEMONSTRATEDKnowledge:
remembering facts
Shows/presents infoProvides resources
Reads, listens, watches, observes, takes notes
States who, what, where, when, why, and how
Comprehension:understanding
facts
Observes, listens, questions, guides,
evaluates and responds
Understands and can recognize in other forms. Can explain to others and
use it.
Gives a personal or original example of how to use the
information
Application:solving a problem
involving facts
Observes, coaches, facilitates, and questions
Applies prior knowledge and understanding to new
situations.
Solves problems on own. Knows when info/skill is needed to solve new problems or tasks.
Analysis:logically
ordering facts
Observes, probes, guides, asks critical questions
Examines process. Breaks down info into components to clarify the whole picture.
Teaches knowledge/skill to another and is a resource. Can compare/contrast info/skill with
other info/skill
Synthesis:creating by using facts
Supports, guides, stimulates and facilitates
Uses all knowledge to develop new tools, plan effectively, and create
alternatives
Combines, develops, and creates
Evaluation:judging the
facts
Listens, discusses, challenges, and accepts
Is open and appreciative of the value of ideas,
procedures, and methods. Can make well-supported
judgments
Formulates and presents well-supported judgments, displays
consideration of others, examines personal options, and
makes wise choices
Knowledge: remembering
facts
Comprehension: understanding
facts
Application:solving a problem
involving factsAnalysis:
logically ordering facts
Synthesis:creating by using
factsEvaluation:judging the
facts
KNOWLEDGE:IS “REMEMBERING” IT
• The teacher introduces, shows, and presents information and provides resources for the students.
• The student reads, listens, watches or observes, takes notes, is able to recall information, asks and responds to questions. The student will practice self-help.
• The student can demonstrate knowledge by stating who, what, where, when, why, and how.
COMPREHENSION:IS “UNDERSTANDING” IT
• The teacher observes, listens, questions, evaluates, guides, and responds to students.
• The student understands the information or skill and can recognize it in other forms. She can explain it to others and make use of it. The student practices self-help.
• The student can demonstrate comprehension by giving a personal or original example of how to use the information.
APPLICATION:IS “SOLVING THE PROBLEM”
• The teacher observes, coaches, facilitates and questions work being done.
• The student can apply prior knowledge and understanding to new situations. The student practices self-help.
• The student can demonstrate application by solving problems on his own. He recognizes when the information/skill is needed and can use it to solve new problems or complete tasks.
ANALYSIS:IS “ORDERING IT LOGICALLY”
• The teacher observes, probes, guides, asks critical questions, and acts as a resource to students.
• The student examines process. She breaks down information into component parts and can explain the individual parts. She knows how and when to put the parts back together so that the organization of the whole becomes clearer. She practices self-help.
• The student can demonstrate analysis by teaching the knowledge or skill effectively to another person and act as a resource for others. She can compare/contrast information/skill with other knowledge or skills.
SYNTHESIS:IS “CREATING”
• The teacher supports, guides, stimulates, and facilitates assessment.
• The student uses all knowledge, understanding, and skills to develop new tools, plan effectively, and create alternatives. He practices self-help.
• The student can demonstrate synthesis by combining, developing, and creating.
EVALUATION:IS “JUDGING”
• The teacher listens, discusses, challenges, and accepts.
• The student is open to and appreciative of the value of ideas, procedures, and methods and can make well-supported judgments, backed up by knowledge, understanding, and skills. She practices self-help.
• The student can demonstrate evaluation by formulating and presenting well-supported judgments, displaying consideration of others, examining personal options, and making wise choices.
The new version (2001) is different from the old version (1956) in that it uses action words,
supports fluidity among the levels during extended brain processing and switches the
top two levels.
Your Task
• In your group, use the Quick Flip for Critical Thinking tool to write questions about your art piece.
• Your questions should be written according to the level indicated from Bloom’s Taxonomy of Thinking.
• Write posed questions on big post-it.
Rate the Question Rubric
Use three criteria to rate a powerful question:
√
Bloom's Taxonomyof Thinking Level-
is the question on the appropriate
level?
Question is on a knowledge or comprehension level
Question is on an application level
Question is on an analysis or
synthesis level
Question is on an evaluative level
____
ContentConnection-
does the questionguide the content
to that level?
Question connects thinking about the
content on knowledge and/or comprehension
level
Question connects thinking about the
content on an application level
Question connects thinking about the content
on an analysis and/or synthesis
level
Question connects thinking about the content on an evaluative
level
____
Clarity of Question-
is the question clear?
Question is unclear and/ or can be misinterpreted
Question is clear but lacks challenge in
thought
Question is clear and provokes thought
Question is insightful and provokes
creative thought____
Total √ ____