whodas 2.0 intro
TRANSCRIPT
1 |
Joseph and his mother, March 2003 Joseph J. and his mother, January 2004
ICD-10 B24 HIV disease B24 HIV disease
ICF activity limitations performance restriction in: Moving around (d455.44) Washing (d510.33) Education (d830.44)
…
Almost fully functional moderate participation restriction in Higher education (d830.03)
World H ealth O rganization D isability A ssessment Schedule 2.0
Dr T. Bedirhan Üstün Classifications, Terminologies and Standards,
WHO, Geneva
WH ODA S 2.0
5 |
What is WH ODA S 2.0 ?
– A generic assessment instrument for measuring health and disability – in clinical practice – at population level
– captures the level of functioning in six domains of life
1: Cognition understanding and communicating
2: Mobility moving and getting around
3: Self-care hygiene, dressing, eating and staying alone
4: Getting along interacting with other people
5: Life activities domestic responsibilities, leisure, work and school
6: Participation joining in community activities, participating in society
– provides a disability profile and a summary measure • that is reliable • applicable across cultures, in all adult populations
6 |
Why use WH ODA S 2.0 ?
Direct conceptual link to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)
Cross-cultural comparability
Good Psychometric Properties
Ease of use and availability
10 |
Disease Status (ICD)
Information about Illness, disorder, injury, trauma
Functional Status (ICF)
Information about functioning @ body level: IMPAIRMENTS @ person level: ACTIVITIES @ societal level: PARTICIPATION impact of person’s ENVIRONMENT (barriers/facilitators)
Quality of Life
Subjective well-being, satisfaction
Where is WH ODA S 2.0 in the context of Health Status information?
WH ODA S 2.0
WHOQoL
11 |
WH ODA S 2.0 Development Centres
Seattle
Lima Ibadan
Santander Luxembourg
London Amsterdam
Hamburg
Ankara Athens
Bangalore
Beijing Tokyo Vienna
Delhi Madras
Santiago
Mexico City Havana
Michigan
New York St. Louis Pitsburg
Moscow
Pnom Peng
Tmisora
Tunisia Lebanon
12 |
WHO DAS CENTRES T. Kugener Austria K. Hourn Cambodia G. Yao China J. Saiz Cuba V. Mavreas Greece S. Murthy India H. Pal India R. Thara India U. Nocentini Italy M. Tazaki Japan E. Karam Lebanon C. Pull Luxembourg H. Hoek Netherlands B. Odejide Nigeria J. Segura Garcia Peru R. Vrasti Romania D. Veltischev Russia J.-L. Vazquez-Barquero Spain N.Glozier UK P. Doyle USA D. Hasin USA
TASK FORCE MEMBERS: M. von Korff USA (HSR TF Chair) C. Pull Luxembourg (AI TF Chair) E. Badley Canada K. Ritchie France D. Wiersma Netherlands M. Prince U.K. R. Kessler USA R. Trotter USA NIH Staff C. Kennedy, G. Norquist, K. Magruder NIMH B. Grant NIAAA R. Battjes & B. Fletcher NIDA WHO STAFF T.B. Ustun , N. Kostansjek S. Chatterji, J. Rehm
WH ODA S 2.0 Development TEAM
13 |
Construction of WH ODA S 2.0
Develop and Structure Item Pool – Input from 300+ health or functioning assessment instruments
Link with ICF Operational Definitions – translate criteria into Questions
Nested Multi-level assessment – Short version: epidemiological surveys & censuses – Medium version: everyday practice – Extended versions: Modules for specific areas, detailed norms
Time frame – Last month Last year Lifetime
Family of Instruments – Structured & semi-structured versions – Self - Clinician - Proxy versions
Scoring WHO-DAS – Constructing Scoring Algorithms – Summary measures
14 |
WH ODA S 2.0 Development History
Phase 1: Cross-cultural Applicability Research – Exploration of Domains, items, wording
Phase 2: Questionnaire Construction & Item Reduction – 300 items ---> SIX DOMAINS - 89 Items (CTT and IRT)
– Cross cultural stability
– Exploration on Screens
– Exploration on INTENSITY (difficulty) and FREQUENCY(time)
Phase 3: Reliability
Phase 4: Health Services Research
15 |
Conceptual equivalence of Disability Assessment
– Language – Norms, Values , beliefs – Classification differences – Context differences
Translatability
Usability
Cross-population comparability
16 |
Structure of WH ODA S 2.0
Full version (36-item) – provides most detail – allows to compute overall and 6 domain specific functioning scores – available as interviewer-, self- and proxy-administered forms – average interview time: 20 min.
Short version (12-item) – useful for brief assessments of overall functioning in surveys or health-outcome studies – allows to compute overall functioning scores – explains 81% of the variance of the 36-item version – available as interviewer-, self- and proxy-administered forms – average interview time: 5 min.
Hybrid Versions (12+24-item) – uses 12 items to screen for problematic domains of functioning. – Based on positive responses to the initial 12 items, respondents may be given up to
24 additional questions. – can only be administered by interview or computer-adaptive testing (CAT)
17 |
WH ODA S 2.0 Questions Short Version (12 item)
In the last 30 days how much difficulty did you have in:
1. Standing for long periods such as 30 minutes? 2. Taking care of your household responsibilities? 3. Learning a new task, for example, learning how to get to a new place? 4. How much of a problem did you have joining in community activities (for
example, festivities, religious or other activities) in the same way as anyone else can?
5. How much have you been emotionally affected by your health problems? 6. Concentrating on doing something for ten minutes? 7. Walking a long distance such as a kilometre [or equivalent]? 8. Washing your whole body? 9. Getting dressed? 10. Dealing with people you do not know? 11. Maintaining a friendship? 12. Your day to day work?
18 |
WH ODA S 2.0 Screen construction A 12 item screen was constructed based on:
5 items on general disability factor: • explains 88% of the variation • sensitivity for general disability >90% • domain-specific cases (> 90%)
Additional 7 items – 2 items per domain allows stem-branch skip
19 |
WH ODA S 2.0 factor structure
20 |
WH ODA S 2.0 reliability: test–retest summary
21 |
WH ODA S 2.0 Domain profile by subgroup
22 |
WH ODA S 2.0 Concurrent Validity Summary
SF QOL LHS FIM1 Cognition -.56 -.482 Mobility -.82/-.59 -.60/-.68 -.70 -.80 3 Self Care -.58/-.76 -.47 -.694 Interpersonal -.54 -.36/-.57 -.62 -.375 Work & Home -.54/-.46 -.516 Participation -.69 -.39
23 |
WH ODA S 2.0 relationship with work disability
WHODAS 2.0 Score
Days with reduced household tasks
Days missed work for half day or more
Cognition .28 .15
Mobility .42 .31
Self Care .48 .40
Interpersonal .33 .28
Work & Household .68 .58
Participation .53 .49 TOTAL
.63
.52
24 |
WH ODA S 2.0 Responsiveness in depressed subjects
0.8
1.07
0.44
0.72
0.74
0.81
1.32
0.23
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4
Outpatient care(Mexico City)
Outpatient care(Ibadan, Nigeria)
Outpatient care ofelderly (London, UK)
Primary health care(Seattle, USA)
WHODAS 2.0 Comparator
Effect size (mean/SD)
LHS
LHS
SF-36 (MCS)
SF-36 (MCS)
N = 100
N = 60
N = 40
N = 73
25 |
WH O DA S I I Responsiveness in schizophrenia subjects
1.03
1.38
0.65
0.86
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4
Outpatient care(Cuba)
Outpatient care -newly treated
(Beijing, China)
WHODAS 2.0 Comparator
Effect size (mean/SD)
LHS
SF-12 (MCS)
N = 50
N = 50
26 |
WH ODA S 2.0 Responsiveness in other conditions
1.25
0.77
0.59
1.19
0.58
0.42
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4
Alcohol dependencerehab. (Romania)
Hip / kneearthoplasty
(London, UK)
Primary care of lowback pain (Seattle,
US)
WHODAS 2.0 Comparator
Effect size (mean/SD)
LHS
SF-12 (PCS)
LHS
N = 80
N = 72
N = 76
27 |
Scoring WH ODA S 2.0
Simple scoring – summing-up of scores assigned to each of the items
– “none” (1), “mild” (2) “moderate” (3), “severe” (4) and “extreme” (5) – no recoding or collapsing of response categories
– comparable within groups
Complex scoring – recoding/collapsing of response categories for each item – summing of recoded item scores within each domain – summing of all six domain scores – converting into a metric 0 to 100 (where 0 = no disability; 100 = full disability)
– comparable across populations “item-response-theory” IRT-based scoring
28 | CLASSIFICATIO N S … BUILDIN G BLO CKS O F H EALTH
29 |
… give me a place to stand and I will move the earth
Can M o d er n I RT Help?
30 |
Population distribution of IRT-based scores for WH ODA S 2.0 – Full version
31 |
Population distribution of IRT-based scores for WH ODA S 2.0 – Short version
32 |
Out of Plato's Cave
Measuring "latent" traits
– Mobility – Seeing – Hearing – Cognition – …
33 |
Mobility Vignettes
Paul: active athlete who runs long distance races of 20 kilometres
Mary: has no problems with moving around or using her hands, arms and legs. She jogs 4 kilometres twice a week
Rob: is able to walk distances of up to 200 metres without any problems but feels breathless after walking one km.
Margaret: feels chest pain and gets breathless after walking distances of up to 200 metres, but is able to do so without assistance. Bending and lifting objects such as groceries produces pain.
Louis: is able to move his arms and legs, but requires assistance in standing up from a chair or walking around the house. Any bending is painful and lifting is impossible.
David: paralysed from the neck down; is confined to bed and must be fed and bathed by somebody else
34 |
Calibration Tests
Mobility: variation of standard PosturoLocomotor Test.
Vision: a standard vision chart (Snellen)
Cognition:.
– simple memory: 10 objects given, immediate recall & 20mn recall
– cancellation test: a combined test of attention, task execution
– fluency: naming as many as animals in 1 minute.
35 |
Applications of WH ODA S 2.0 : Population surveys
Multi-country studies/applications – WHO Multi Country Survey Study (MCSS) – World Mental Health Survey (WMHS) – Global Study on Aging (SAGE) – Tsunami Recovery Impact Assessment and Monitoring System (TRIAMS)
– WHO/UNESCAP project on disability statistics
Country studies – Ireland’s National Physical and Sensory Disability Database (NPSDD) – National Health Performance Assessment Survey (Mexico) – First National Study on Disability (Chile) – US VA Twin Registry
36 |
Clinical applications of WH ODA S 2.0
Disease specific validation studies / health outcome assessment – inflammatory arthritis – stroke – systemic sclerosis – anxiety disorders – hearing loss – psychotic disorders – schizophrenia – HIV/AIDS – depression – low back pain – ankylosing spondylitis – Injuries – …
Setting specific validation studies / health outcome assessment – General practitioners – Clinical rehabilitation – Community based care for the elderly – …
37 |
WH ODA S 2.0 Domain 1: Cognition
1. Concentrating on doing something
2. Remembering to do important things
3. Analyzing and finding solutions to problems in day to day life
4. Learning a new task, for example, learning how to get to a new place
5. Generally understanding what people say
6. Starting and maintaining a conversation
38 |
WH ODA S 2.0 Domain 2: Mobility
1. Standing for long periods such as 30 minutes
2. Standing up from sitting down
3. Moving around inside your home
4. Getting out of your home
5. Walking a long distance such as a kilometre (or equivalent)
39 |
WH ODA S 2.0 Domain 3: Self care
1. Washing your whole body
2. Getting dressed
3. Eating
4. Staying by yourself for a few days
40 |
WH ODA S 2.0 Domain 4: Getting along with people
1. Dealing with people you do not know
2. Maintaining a friendship
3. Getting along with people who are close to you
4. Making new friends
5. Sexual activities
41 |
WH ODA S 2.0 Domain 5: Life activities
1. Taking care of your household responsibilities
2. Doing most important household tasks well
3. Getting all the household work done
4. Getting your household work done as quickly as needed
5. Your day to day work
6. Doing your most important tasks well
7. Getting all the work done that you need to do
8. Getting your work done as quickly as needed
42 |
WH ODA S 2.0 Domain 6: Participation in society
1. Joining in community activities
2. Barriers or hindrances in the world around you
3. Living with dignity because of the attitudes and actions of others
4. Time spent on health condition
5. Been emotionally affected by your health condition
6. Impact on the financial resources of you or your family
7. Problem to the family
8. Relaxation or pleasure
43 |
WH ODA S 2.0 Probes
• EACH ITEM: • extent of difficulty
• Optional probes ( tested during development phase)
• number of days
• for positive items
• assistance used: device or personal help • avertability (interventions: self - environment)
• Positive functioning
• Overall Functioning (domain - total)
44 |
WH ODA S 2.0 Next Steps
Development of additional modules – Impairments: 17 Questions from WHS – Environmental factors
Computer Adaptive Testing
Construction of different versions: – Clinician (SCAN-like) version – Children and Youth version
Link WHODAS 2.0 scores to disability weights in DALYs
Enhance Population norms (overall & domain specific)
45 |
WH ODA S 2.0 Next Steps
Comparability research – Item Response Theory Applications – Inclusion of Vignettes – Measured Tests
Health Services Research applications – Outcome – Cost – Need – Utilization – Course
A new way to build the
ICD
ICD11 αlpha http://www.who.int/classifications/icd/revision
Alpha – Browser & Print 10 look & feel + descriptions – code structure !
• ICD-11 alpha draft is INCOMPLETE • updated on a daily basis • NOT TO BE USED for CODING at this stage • not yet been approved by the TAGs, RSG or WHO
ICD-11 Features
Internet Based Platform
Content Model
Multi Lingual Representations
Definitions
Input from all Stakeholders
Arabic لعربية 官话 Chinese English English Français French Русский язык Russian Español Spanish Deutsch German Português Portuguese
Field Trials for Use Cases
Electronic Health Record Ready
THE CONTENT MODEL Any Category in ICD is represented by:
1. ICD Concept Title 1.1. Fully Specified Name 2. Classification Properties 2.1. Parents 2.2 Type 2.3. Use and Linearization(s) 3. Textual Definition(s) 4. Terms 4.1. Base Index Terms 4.2. Inclusion Terms 4.3. Exclusions 5. Body Structure Description 5.1. Body System(s) 5.2. Body Part(s) [Anatomical Site(s)] 5.3. Morphological Properties 6. Manifestation Properties 6.1. Signs & Symptoms 6.2. Investigation findings
7. Causal Properties 7.1. Etiology Type 7.2. Causal Properties - Agents 7.3. Causal Properties - Causal Mechanisms 7.4. Genomic Linkages 7.5. Risk Factors
8. Temporal Properties 8.1. Age of Occurrence & Occurrence Frequency 8.2. Development Course/Stage
9. Severity of Subtypes Properties 10. Functioning Properties 10.1. Impact on Activities and Participation 10.2. Contextual factors 10.3. Body functions 11. Specific Condition Properties 11.1 Biological Sex 11.2. Life-Cycle Properties
12.Treatment Properties 13. Diagnostic Criteria
50 |
Ontology (philosophy) – the Organization of Reality !!!
Ontology (computer science) – the explicit – operational description
of the conceptualization of a domain: Concepts: entity and quality
(properties and attributes)
An ontology defines: – a common vocabulary a shared
understanding/exchange: among people among software agents between people and software
Wh a t i s O n t o l o g y ?
52 |
Operationalization of Diagnosis
ICD A Specific phenomenology
B Signs and Symptoms
C ….
D Exclusion rules
DSM A Specific phenomenology
B Signs and Symptoms
C DISABILITY & DISTRESS
D Exclusion rules
53 |
Separate Classification of Disease and Disability
+ = case
Diagnosis Disability = case
54 |
Public Health, Epi & Surveillance
Findings Interventions Events
Re a l Ti m e P u b l i c H e a l t h Rule-based Aggregation @ Individual, Facility, Population levels
Clinical Information
Reimbursement Resource Management
55 |
Mental Health and Rest of Medicine
• Parity – Common Information Model
– Disease definition: • Dimensions – Categories - Thresholds
– Formulation of Disability
– Use in electronic health records
56 |