william a. goddard, iii, wag@wagltech 316 beckman institute, x3093
DESCRIPTION
Lecture 6 January 18, 2012 CC Bonds diamond, Δ Hf, Group additivity. Nature of the Chemical Bond with applications to catalysis, materials science, nanotechnology, surface science, bioinorganic chemistry, and energy. Course number: Ch120a Hours: 2-3pm Monday, Wednesday, Friday. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 Ch120a-Goddard-
L01
1
Nature of the Chemical Bond with applications to catalysis, materials
science, nanotechnology, surface science, bioinorganic chemistry, and energy
William A. Goddard, III, [email protected] Beckman Institute, x3093
Charles and Mary Ferkel Professor of Chemistry, Materials Science, and Applied Physics,
California Institute of Technology
Teaching Assistants: Caitlin Scott <[email protected]>Hai Xiao [email protected]; Fan Liu <[email protected]>
Lecture 6 January 18, 2012
CC Bonds diamond, ΔHf, Group additivity
Course number: Ch120aHours: 2-3pm Monday, Wednesday, Friday
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08
Last time
2
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 3
Summary, bonding to form hydrides
General principle: start with ground state of AHn and add H to form the ground state of AHn+1
Thus use 1A1 AH2 for SiH2 and CF2 get pyramidal AH3
Use 3B1 for CH2 get planar AH3.
For less than half filled p shell, the presence of empty p orbitals allows the atom to reduce electron correlation of the (ns) pair by hybridizing into this empty orbital.
This has remarkable consequences on the states of the Be, B, and C columns.
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 4
Now combine Carbon fragments to form larger molecules (old chapter 7)
Starting with the ground state of CH3 (planar), we bring two together to form ethane, H3C-CH3.
As they come together to bond, the CH bonds bend back from the CC bond to reduce overlap (Pauli repulsion or steric interactions between the CH bonds on opposite C).
At the same time the 2pp radical orbital on each C mixes with 2s character, pooching it toward the corresponding hybrid orbital on the other C
107.7º
111.2º
1.526A
1.095A1.086A120.0º
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 5
Bonding (GVB) orbitals of ethane (staggered)
Note nodal planes from
orthogonalization to CH bonds on
right C
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 6
Staggered vs. Eclipsed
There are two extreme cases for the orientation about the CC axis of the two methyl groups
The salient difference between these is the overlap of the CH bonding orbitals on opposite carbons.
To whatever extent they overlap, SCH-CH Pauli requires that they be orthogonalized, which leads to a repulsion that increases exponentially with decreasing distance RCH-CH.
The result is that the staggered conformation is favored over eclipsed by 3.0 kcal/mol
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 7
Alternative interpretation
The bonding electrons are distributed over the molecule, but it is useful to decompose the wavefunction to obtain the net charge on each atom.
qH ~ +0.15
qC ~ -0.45
This leads to qH ~ +0.15 and qC ~ -0.45.
These charges do NOT indicate the electrostatic energies within the molecule, but rather the electrostatic energy for interacting with an external field.
Even so, one could expect that electrostatics would favor staggered.
The counter example is CH3-C=C-CH3, which has a rotational barrier of 0.03 kcal/mol (favoring eclipsed). Here the CH bonds are ~ 3 times that in CH3-CH3 so that electrostatic effects would decrease by only 1/3. However overlap decreases exponentially.
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 8
Propane
Replacing an H of ethane with CH3, leads to propane
Keeping both CH3 groups staggered leads to the unique structure
Details are as shown. Thus the bond angles are
HCH = 108.1 and 107.3 on the CH3
HCH =106.1 on the secondary C
CCH=110.6 and 111.8
CCC=112.4,
Reflecting the steric effects
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 9
Trends: geometries of alkanes
CH bond length = 1.095 ± 0.001A
CC bond length = 1.526 ± 0.001A
CCC bond angles
HCH bond angles
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 10
Bond energies
De = EAB(R=∞) - EAB(Re) e for equilibrium)Get from QM calculations. Re is distance at minimum energy.
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 11
Bond energies
De = EAB(R=∞) - EAB(Re) Get from QM calculations. Re is distance at minimum energyD0 = H0AB(R=∞) - H0AB(Re) H0=Ee + ZPE is enthalpy at T=0K
ZPE = ½Ћ) This is spectroscopic bond energy from ground vibrational state (0K)Including ZPE changes bond distance slightly to R0
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 12
Bond energies
De = EAB(R=∞) - EAB(Re) Get from QM calculations. Re is distance at minimum energyD0 = H0AB(R=∞) - H0AB(Re) H0=Ee + ZPE is enthalpy at T=0K
ZPE = ½Ћ) This is spectroscopic bond energy from ground vibrational state (0K)Including ZPE changes bond distance slightly to R0Experimental bond enthalpies at 298K and atmospheric pressure D298(A-B) = H298(A) – H298(B) – H298(A-B)
D298 – D0 = 0∫298 [Cp(A) +Cp(B) – Cp(A-B)] dT =2.4 kcal/mol if A and
B are nonlinear molecules (Cp(A) = 4R). {If A and B are atoms D298 – D0 = 0.9 kcal/mol (Cp(A) = 5R/2)}.(H = E + pV assuming an ideal gas)
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 13
Bond energies, temperature corrections
Experimental measurements of bond energies, say at 298K, require an additional correction from QM or from spectroscopy.
The experiments measure the energy changes at constant pressure and hence they measure the enthalpy,
H = E + pV (assuming an ideal gas)
Thus at 298K, the bond energy is
D298(A-B) = H298(A) – H298(B) – H298(A-B)
D298 – D0 = 0∫298 [Cp(A) +Cp(B) – Cp(A-B)] dT =2.4 kcal/mol
if A and B are nonlinear molecules (Cp(A) = 4R).
{If A and B are atoms D298 – D0 = 0.9 kcal/mol (Cp(A) = 5R/2)}.
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 14
Snap Bond Energy: Break bond without relaxing the fragments
Snap
Adiabatic
Erelax = 2*7.3 kcal/mol
DsnapDesnap (109.6 kcal/mol) De (95.0kcal/mol)
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 15
Bond energies for ethane
D0 = 87.5 kcal/mol
ZPE (CH3) = 18.2 kcal/mol,
ZPE (C2H6) = 43.9 kcal/mol,
De = D0 + 7.5 = 95.0 kcal/mol (this is calculated from QM)
D298 = 87.5 + 2.4 = 89.9 kcal/mol
This is the quantity we will quote in discussing bond breaking processes
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 16
The snap Bond energy
In breaking the CC bond of ethane the geometry changes from CC=1.526A, HCH=107.7º, CH=1.095A
To CC=∞, HCH=120º, CH=1.079A
Thus the net bond energy involves both breaking the CC bond and relaxing the CH3 fragments.
We find it useful to separate the bond energy into
The snap bond energy (only the CC bond changes, all other bonds and angles of the fragments are kept fixed)
The fragment relaxation energy.
This is useful in considering systems with differing substituents.
For CH3 this relation energy is 7.3 kcal/mol so that
De,snap (CH3-CH3) = 95.0 + 2*7.3 = 109.6 kcal/mol
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 17
Substituent effects on Bond energies
The strength of a CC bond changes from 89.9 to 70 kcal/mol as the various H are replace with methyls.Explanations given include:
•Ligand CC pair-pair repulsions
•Fragment relaxation
•Inductive effects
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 18
Ligand CC pair-pair repulsions:
Each H to Me substitution leads to 2 new CH bonds gauche to the original CC bond, which would weaken the CC bond.
Thus C2H6 has 6 CH-CH interactions lost upon breaking the bond,
But breaking a CC bond of propane loses also two addition CC-CH interactions.
This would lead to linear changes in the bond energies in the table, which is approximately true. However it would suggest that the snap bond energies would decrease, which is not correct.
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 19
Fragment relaxation
Because of the larger size of Me compared to H, there will be larger ligand-ligand interaction energies and hence a bigger relaxation energy in the fragment upon relaxing form tetrahedral to planar geometries.
In this model the snap bond enegies are all the same.
All the differences lie in the relaxation of the fragments.
This is observed to be approximately correct
Inductive effect
A change in the character of the CC bond orbital due to replacement of an H by the Me.
Goddard believes that fragment relaxation is the correct explanation PUT IN ACTUAL RELAXATION ENERGIES
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 20
Bond energies: Compare to CF3-CF3
For CH3-CH3 we found a snap bond energy of
De = 95.0 + 2*7.3 = 109.6 kcal/mol
Because the relaxation of tetrahedral CH3 to planar gains 7.3 kcal/mol
For CF3-CF3, there is no such relaxation since CF3 wants to be pyramidal, FCF~111º
Thus we might estimate that for CF3-CF3 the bond energy would be De = 109.6 kcal/mol, hence D298 ~ 110-5=105
Indeed the experimental value is D298=98.7±2.5 kcal/mol suggesting that the main effect in substituent effects is relaxation (the remaining effects might be induction and steric)
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08
New material lecture 6, January 18, 2012
21
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 22
CH2 +CH2 ethene
Starting with two methylene radicals (CH2) in the ground state (3B1) we can form ethene (H2C=CH2) with both a bond and a bond.
The HCH angle in CH2 was 132.3º, but Pauli Repulsion with the new bond, decreases this angle to 117.6º (cf with 120º for CH3)
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 23
Comparison of The GVB bonding orbitals of ethene
and methylene
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 24
Twisted ethene
Consider now the case where the plane of one CH2 is rotated by 90º with respect to the other (about the CC axis)This leads only to a bond. The nonbonding l and r orbitals can be combined into singlet and triplet states
Here the singlet state is referred to as N (for Normal) and the triplet state as T.
Since these orbitals are orthogonal, Hund’s rule suggests that T is lower than N (for 90º). The Klr ~ 0.7 kcal/mol so that the splitting should be ~1.4 kcal/mol.
Voter, Goodgame, and Goddard [Chem. Phys. 98, 7 (1985)] showed that N is below T by 1.2 kcal/mol, due to Intraatomic Exchange ( on same center)
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 25
Twisting potential surface for ethene
The twisting potential surface for ethene is shown below. The N state prefers θ=0º to obtain the highest overlap while the T state prefers θ=90º to obtain the lowest overlap
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 26
geometries
For the N state (planar) the CC bond distance is 1.339A, but this increases to 1.47A for the twisted form with just a single bond.
This compares with 1.526 for the CC bond of ethane.
Probably the main effect is that twisted ethene has very little CH Pauli Repulsion between CH bonds on opposite C, whereas ethane has substantial interactions.
This suggests that the intrinsic CC single bond may be closer to 1.47A
For the T state the CC bond for twisted is also 1.47A, but increases to 1.57 for planar due to Orthogonalization of the triple coupled p orbitals.
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 27
CC double bond energies
Breaking the double bond of ethene, the HCH bond angle changes from 117.6º to 132.xº, leading to an increase of 2.35 kcal/mol in the energy of each CH2 so that
Desnap = 180.0 + 4.7 = 184.7 kcal/mol
Since the Desnap = 109.6 kcal/mol, for H3C-CH3,
The bond adds 75.1 kcal/mol to the bonding.
Indeed this is close to the 65kcal/mol rotational barrier.
For the twisted ethylene, the CC bond is De = 180-65=115 Desnap = 115 + 5 =120. This increase of 10 kcal/mol compared to ethane might indicate the effect of CH repulsions
The bond energies for ethene are
De=180.0, D0 = 169.9, D298K = 172.3 kcal/mol
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 28
bond energy of F2C=CF2
The snap bond energy for the double bond of ethene od
Desnap = 180.0 + 4.7 = 184.7 kcal/mol
As an example of how to use this consider the bond energy of F2C=CF2,
Here the 3B1 state is 57 kcal/higher than 1A1 so that the fragment relaxation is 2*57 = 114 kcal/mol, suggesting that the F2C=CF2 bond energy is Dsnap~184-114 = 70 kcal/mol.
The experimental value is D298 ~ 75 kcal/mol, close to the prediction
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 29
Bond energies double bonds
Although the ground state of CH2 is 3B1 by 9.3 kcal/mol, substitution of one or both H with CH3 leads to singlet ground states. Thus the CC bonds of these systems are weakened because of this promotion energy.
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 30
C=C bond energies
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 31
CC triple bonds
Starting with two CH radicals in the 4- state we can form ethyne (acetylene) with two bonds and a bond.
This leads to a CC bond length of 1.208A compared to 1.339 for ethene and 1.526 for ethane.
The bond energy is
De = 235.7, D0 = 227.7, D298K = 229.8 kcal/mol
Which can be compared to De of 180.0 for H2C=CH2 and 95.0 for H3C-CH3.
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 32
GVB orbitals of HCCH
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 33
GVB orbitals of CH 2 and 4- state
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 34
CC triple bonds
Since the first CC bond is De=95 kcal/mol and the first CC bond adds 85 to get a total of 180, one might wonder why the CC triple bond is only 236, just 55 stronger.
The reason is that forming the triple bond requires promoting the CH from 2 to 4-, which costs 17 kcal each, weakening the bond by 34 kcal/mol. Adding this to the 55 would lead to a total 2nd bond of 89 kcal/mol comparable to the first
2
4-
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 35
Bond energies
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 36
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 37
Diamond
Replacing all H atoms of ethane and with methyls, leads to with a staggered conformation
Continuing to replace H with methyl groups forever, leads to the diamond crystal structure, where all C are bonded tetrahedrally to four C and all bonds on adjacent C are staggered
A side view is
This leads to the diamond crystal structure. An expanded view is on the next slide
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 38
Infinite structure from tetrahedral bonding plus staggered bonds on adjacent centers
Chair configuration
of cylco-hexane
Not shown: zero layer just like 2nd layer but above layer 13rd layer just like the 1st layer but below layer 2
2nd layer
1st layer
2nd layer
1st layer
2nd layer
1st layer
1
1
c 1
3 1
02
1
2
1
0
1
1
20
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 39
The unit cell of diamond crystal
An alternative view of the diamond structure is in terms of cubes of side a, that can be translated in the x, y, and z directions to fill all space.
Note the zig-zag chains c-i-f-i-c and cyclohexane rings (f-i-f)-(i-f-i)
•all 8 corners (but only 1/8 inside the cube): (0,0,0)•all 6 faces (each with ½ in the cube): (a/2,a/2,0), (a/2,0,a/2), (0,a/2,a/2)•plus 4 internal to the cube: (a/4,a/4,a/4), (3a/4,3a/4,a/4), (a/4,3a/4,3a/4), (3a/4,a/4,3a/4), Thus each cube represents 8 atoms.All other atoms of the infinite crystal are obtained by translating this cube by multiples of a in the x,y,z directions
There are atoms at c c
c c
c c
c c
ff
f
f
f
f
i
i
ii
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 40
Diamond Structure
12
1a
1c1b
32b
2a
Start with C1 and make 4 bonds to form
a tetrahedron.
Now bond one of these atoms, C2, to 3 new C
so that the bond are staggered with respect
to those of C1.
Continue this process.
Get unique structure: diamond
Note: Zig-zag chain
1b-1-2-3-4-5-6
Chair cyclohexane ring: 1-2-3-3b-7-1c
43b
3a
54b
4a
5b
5a
67
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 41
Properties of diamond crystals
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 42
Properties of group IV molecules (IUPAC group 14)
1.526
There are 4 bonds to each atom, but each bond connects two atoms. Thus to obtain the energy per bond we take the total heat of vaporization and divide by two. Note for Si, that the average bond is much different than for Si2H6
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 43
Comparisons of successive bond energies SiHn and CHn
p lobe
p
lobe
p
p
lobe
lobe
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 44
Redo the next sections
Talk about heats formation first
Then group additivity
Then resonance etc
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 45
Benzene and Resonance
referred to as Kekule or VB structures
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 46
Resonance
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 47
Benzene wavefunction
≡ +
benzene as
is a superposition of the VB structures in (2)
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 48
More on resonance
That benzene would have a regular 6-fold symmetry is not obvious. Each VB spin coupling would prefer to have the double bonds at ~1.34A and the single bond at ~1.47 A (as the central bond in butadiene)
Thus there is a cost to distorting the structure to have equal bond distances of 1.40A.
However for the equal bond distances, there is a resonance stabilization that exceeds the cost of distorting the structure, leading to D6h symmetry.
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 49
Cyclobutadiene
For cyclobutadiene, we have the same situation, but here the rectangular structure is more stable than the square.That is, the resonance energy does not balance the cost of making the bond distances equal.
1.5x A
1.34 A
The reason is that the pi bonds must be orthogonalized, forcing a nodal plane through the adjacent C atoms, causing the energy to increase dramatically as the 1.54 distance is reduced to 1.40A.
For benzene only one nodal plane makes the pi bond orthogonal to both other bonds, leading to lower cost
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 50
graphene
This is referred to as graphene
Graphene: CC=1.4210ABond order = 4/3Benzene: CC=1.40 BO=3/2Ethylene: CC=1.34 BO = 2CCC=120°Unit cell has 2 carbon atoms
1x1 Unit cell
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 51
Graphene band structure
Unit cell has 2 carbon atomsBands: 2p orbitals per cell2 bands of states each with N states where N is the number of unit cells2 electrons per cell 2N electrons for N unit cellsThe lowest N MOs are doubly occupied, leaving N empty orbitals.
1x1 Unit cell
1st band
2nd band
The filled 1st band touches the empty 2nd band at the Fermi energy
Get semi metal
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 52
Graphite
Stack graphene layers as ABABABCan also get ABCABC RhombohedralAAAA stacking much higher in energy
Distance between layers = 3.3545ACC bond = 1.421Only weak London dispersion attraction between layersDe = 1.0 kcal/mol CEasy to slide layers, good lubricant
Graphite: D0K=169.6 kcal/mol, in plane bond = 168.6Thus average in-plane bond = (2/3)168.6 = 112.4 kcal/mol112.4 = sp2 + 1/3 Diamond: average CCs = 85 kcal/mol = 3*27=81 kcal/mol
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 53
energetics
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 54
Allyl Radical
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 55
Allyl wavefunctions
It is about 12 kcal/mol
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 56
Cn
What is the structure of C3?
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 57
Cn
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 58
Energetics Cn
Note extra stability of odd Cn by 33 kcal/mol, this is because odd Cn has an empty px orbital at one terminus and an empty py on the other, allowing stabilization of both systems
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 59
Stability of odd Cn
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 60
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 61
Bond energies and thermochemical calculations
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 62
Bond energies and thermochemical calculations
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 63
Heats of Formation
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 64
Heats of Formation
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 65
Heats of Formation
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 66
Heats of Formation
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 67
Bond energies
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 68
Bond energies
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 69
Bond energies
Both secondary
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 70
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 71
Average bond energies
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 72
Average bond energies
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 73
Real bond energies
Average bond energies of little use in predicting
mechanism
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 74
Group values
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 75
Group functions of propane
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 76
Examples of using group values
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 77
Group values
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 78
Strain
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 79
Strain energy cyclopropane from Group values
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 80
Strain energy c-C3H6
using real bond
energies
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 81
Stained GVB orbitals of cyclopropane
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 82
Benson Strain energies
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 83
Resonance in thermochemical Calculations
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 84
Resonance in thermochemical Calculations
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 85
Resonance energy butadiene
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 86
Allyl radical
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 87
Benzene resonance
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 88
Benzene resonance
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 89
Benzene resonance
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 90
Benzene resonance
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L07,08 91
Benzene resonance