williams slides for swamos 061713
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713
1/41
U.S. Budgets for Defense and
Security
Cindy Williams
Principal Research Scientist
MIT Security Studies ProgramJuly 2013
1
-
7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713
2/41
Main Points
MIT Security Studies ProgramJuly 2013
2
The United States spends more than $600 billionon defense each year, and close to one trilliondollars on national security
Defense spending grew markedly between 1998and 2010, and has dropped in real terms since
then The size of future defense budgets is uncertain Over the longer term, federal fiscal problems will
probably lead to significant cuts in defensebudget
Achieving the savings that are likely to be neededwill require significantly smaller forces and a shiftin national security strategy
-
7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713
3/41
Overview of Talk
U.S. defense and security budgets in perspective
The Budget Control Act of 2011 and this years
sequestration
Federal fiscal pressures on the defense budget Cost growth inside the Department of Defense
Shaping forces under significant cutbacks
Budget Process 101: Planning and budgeting fordefense
MIT Security Studies ProgramJuly 2013
3
-
7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713
4/41
National Defense BudgetBillions of Current Dollarsa
Budget Function FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014Request
Department of Defense
Base Budget
War Budget
540
115
499
81
533
88b
Department of Energy
Nuclear Weapons 18 18 19
Defense-Related
Programs 8 8 8
050 National Defense 681 605 649
a Total discretionary plus mandatory budget authorityb OMB placeholder
MIT Security Studies ProgramJuly 2013
4
-
7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713
5/41
U.S. National Defense Outlays in
Perspective
Fiscal Year 2013, including cost of wars
MIT Security Studies ProgramJuly 2013
5
About 40 percent of total world defense spending
18 percent of federal outlays
52 percent of federal discretionary outlays
4.1 percent of gross domestic product (GDP)
Excluding wars, about 30 percent higher in real terms than in2000
Including wars, more than 50 percent higher in real terms
than in 2000 Significantly higher in real terms than Cold War average
Lower as a share of GDP than Cold War average
-
7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713
6/41
MIT Security Studies ProgramJuly 2013
6
40%
17%8%
4%
4%
3%2%
2%
2%
2%
16%
World Defense Spending in 2012
United
States
NATO Allies
China
Russia
Japan
Saudi Arabia
India
Brazil
South Korea
Australia
Rest of
WorldSource: The Military Balance 2013,.
-
7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713
7/41
MIT Security Studies ProgramJuly 2013
7
Non-DefenseDiscretionary
16%
NationalDefense
18%
Social Security22%
Medicare/caid20%
Other Mandatory17%
Interest6%
U.S. Federal Outlays in FY 2013(Total $3.7 Trillion)
-
7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713
8/41
MIT Security Studies ProgramJuly 2013
8
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Billio
nsofConstant2014Dollars
Fiscal Year
U.S. Outlays for National Defense
-
7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713
9/41
MIT Security Studies ProgramJuly 2013
9
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Percent
Fiscal Year
U.S. Outlays for National Defense(Share of GDP)
-
7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713
10/41
MIT Security Studies ProgramJuly 2013
10
Security and International AffairsBudget Authority in Billions of FY 2014 Dollars
FY 2001 FY 2014
Request
National Defense
Base Budget
Wars
Total National Defense
416
0
416
561
88
649
Homeland Security
Total Homeland Security
HS Spending in Defense Department
Homeland Security Net of Defense Dept
21
5
16
73
17
55
International Affairs 27 46
Veterans Affairs 61 150
Total 520 900
-
7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713
11/41
Budget Control Act of 2011
Put limits on security and non-security spending
for fiscal year 2012 to fiscal year 2021
Established a special Congressional committee to
develop a plan for reducing expected federaldeficits by $1.2 trillion over ten years
Established a poison-pill mechanism to take
those reductions automatically if necessary For FY 2013, required that the poison pill be
implemented through sequestration
MIT Security Studies ProgramJuly 2013
11
-
7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713
12/41
Sequestration
What it is: automatic cutbacks from appropriatedfunds that reduce every affected account by thesame percentage
Affected accounts: national defense except formilitary personnel; non-defense discretionary;some Medicare and other entitlements
How much in 2013: About 8 percent fromnational defense, 6 percent from non-defense
discretionary How long: Only for FY 2013; for next 8 years, the
administration and Congress have a choice
MIT Security Studies ProgramJuly 2013
12
-
7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713
13/41
MIT Security Studies ProgramJuly 2013
13
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
2001 2006 2011 2016 2021
Discretionary
BudgetAuth
ority,FY2013
$B
Fiscal Year
Non-War National Defense Budget Under Presidents
FY 2013 and FY 2014 Plans and Budget Control Act
President's FY 2013 Plan
President's FY 2014 Plan
Budget Control Act
-
7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713
14/41
Federal fiscal pressures
How did we get here?
How bad could it be?
What can be done about it?
MIT Security Studies ProgramJuly 2013
14
-
7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713
15/41
MIT Security Studies ProgramJuly 2013
15
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
1962 1967 1972 1977 1982 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 2012
Fiscal Year
Federal OutlaysPercent of Gross Domestic Product
National Defense
Non-Defense Discretionary
Mandatory
Interest
-
7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713
16/41
MIT Security Studies ProgramJuly 2013
16
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
35.0
40.0
45.0
1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Fiscal Year
Outlays and Revenues as Share of GDP
(Percent)
Revenues
Outlays
-
7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713
17/41
MIT Security Studies ProgramJuly 2013
17
-
7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713
18/41
MIT Security Studies ProgramJuly 2013
18
-
7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713
19/41
MIT Security Studies ProgramJuly 2013
19
Measures to avert unsustainable
level of federal debt
Increase revenues above projections
Rein in entitlement spending
Rein in discretionary spending
Compared with current policy, need to shift4.8% of GDP by 2015 to keep debt at
todays level for 25 years
-
7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713
20/41
20MIT Security Studies ProgramJuly 2013
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
2001 2006 2011 2016 2021Discretionary
NationalDefens
eBA,
FY
2013$B
Fiscal Year
Fiscal Sustainability May Require Cuts
Below BCA Levels
President's FY 2013 Plan
Budget Control Act
Proportional Budget Cuts
Equal Budget Cuts
-
7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713
21/41
MIT Security Studies ProgramJuly 2013
21
Budget pressures inside Defense
would push budgets upward
Rising costs of health care for service
members, families, and retirees
Growing costs of military pay and
allowances
Rising cost of civilian pay
Growing costs of new weapons
-
7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713
22/41
MIT Security Studies ProgramJuly 2013
22
Military
Personnel
26%
O&M
40%
Procurement
19%
RDT&E
13%
Other2%
DoD Non-War Budget Authority by
Appropriation Title, FY 2014 Plan
-
7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713
23/41
MIT Security Studies ProgramJuly 2013
23
-
7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713
24/41
MIT Security Studies ProgramJuly 2013
24
-
7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713
25/41
MIT Security Studies ProgramJuly 2013
25
-
7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713
26/41
MIT Security Studies ProgramJuly 2013
26
Army
24%
Navy
29%
Air Force
27%
Defense-wide
20%
Military Departments' Shares of
Defense Budget, FY 2014 Plan
-
7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713
27/41
MIT Security Studies ProgramJuly 2013
27
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
FY 1980 FY 2000 FY 2010 FY 2014 FY 2018
Plan
Military Departments' Shares of
Total Budget for the Services
Air Force
Navy
Army
-
7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713
28/41
MIT Security Studies ProgramJuly 2013
28
Possible Force Structure Options
Current
Plan
Option 1 Option 2
Budget Reduction ---- -10% -16%
Distribution of Cuts ---- Proportional Rebalance
toward Asia
Active Army Brigades 37 32 (-14%) 26 (-30%)
Navy Ships 300+ 250 (-17%) 235 (-22%)
Active Marine Corps
Divisions
3 2+ 2+
Air Force Tactical Squadrons 54 47 (-13%) 42 (-22%)
Active-Duty End Strength
(millions)
1.3 1.2 (-10%) 1.1 (-17%)
-
7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713
29/41
Planning and Budgeting for DoD
MIT Security Studies ProgramJuly 2013
29
Three Players
Department of Defense
White House Congress
The process takes more than two years
-
7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713
30/41
DoD works on three budgets at a time
MIT Security Studies ProgramJuly 2013
30
FY 2013 budget: in execution today, under
sequestration
FY 2014 budget: submitted two months late to
Congress, in April 2013; request is underconsideration there
FY 2015 budget: services now finishing work on their
program objective memoranda (POMs); Office of
Secretary of Defense will hold an integrated program
and budget review this summer and fall
DoDs internal process:
-
7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713
31/41
DoD s internal process:Planning, programming, budgeting,
and execution (PPBE) Creates Presidents Budget (one-year) and
Future-Years Defense Program (FYDP, five
years) Takes guidance from Quadrennial Defense
Review (QDR), which must be submitted to
Congress in February of second year of eachpresidential term
MIT Security Studies ProgramJuly 2013
31
-
7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713
32/41
Purposes of PPBE
MIT Security Studies ProgramJuly 2013
32
Executive management
Civilian control of military
Resource allocation
Determine centrally where the money goes Rational process for exploring priorities and tradeoffs
Make decisions based on explicit criteria of nationalstrategy, not compromises among institutional forces
Consider requirements and costs simultaneously Consider multi-year plan, to project consequences ofpresent decisions into the future
-
7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713
33/41
DoDs PPBE for FY 2015
Planning phase (notional calendar)
Nov 2012
to Apr 2013
Defense Planning and
Programming Guidance
(DPPG): priorities, broad
guidance for capabilities,
detailed guidance onprograms (consistent with
National Security
Strategy, QDR)
Strategic Planning
Council (SPC),
Secretary of
Defense
Apr 2013 Fiscal guidance to
services
OSD CAPE, with
Comptroller
MIT Security Studies ProgramJuly 2013
33
-
7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713
34/41
DoDs PPBE for FY 2015
Programming and Budgeting (notional)
Apr to July
2013
Program Objective Memoranda (POMs),
Budget Estimate Submissions (BESs)
Services,
Agencies
Aug to Oct
2013
Integrated Program Review (policy) and
Budget Review (pricing, executability)
OSD CAPE,
Comptroller;
JCS; OMB
Nov 2013 Final Program Decision Memoranda
(PDMs) and Program Budget Decisions
(PBDs) to Services
Signed by
Deputy
Secretary
Jan 2014 Presidents Budget and Future YearsDefense Program (FYDP) to OMB
OSD
Feb 2014 Presidents Budget and Future Years
Defense Program (FYDP) to Congress
OMB
MIT Security Studies ProgramJuly 2013
34
-
7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713
35/41
Planning and budgeting in the White
House
National Security Staff: Writes the nationalsecurity strategy
Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
Develops fiscal guidance for federal departments(two years ahead of budget year)
Participates directly in the DoDs internal budgetreview process
President: signs authorization andappropriation bills into law
MIT Security Studies ProgramJuly 2013
35
-
7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713
36/41
Planning and budgeting in Congress
Four main processes
Concurrent resolution on the budget (guides
Congress; not a law)
Reconciliation (only for revenues andentitlements)
Authorization (establishes organizations and
policy; authorizes for appropriation) Appropriation (provides funds)
MIT Security Studies ProgramJuly 2013
36
-
7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713
37/41
MIT Security Studies ProgramJuly 2013
37
Authorizing
Committee
Budget
Committee
CBO
Presidents
Budget request
Joint Economic
Committee
Conference
Analysis
Recommendations
on Fiscal policy
Estimate of spending
and revenues in
jurisdiction
House/Senate
Floor
Concurrent Budget
Resolution and
Conference report
Reconciliation
Instructions
Authorizing
Committee
Budget
Committee
Budget
Resolution
Conference
SubcommitteesHouse/Senate
Floor
Budget
Authority
Authorizing
Committee
Appropriations
Committee
Reconciliation
Bill
Appropriations
Bill
Conference
House/Senate
Floor
White House
Conference
House/SenateFloor
Authorization
Bill
-
7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713
38/41
FY 2014 Budget in Congress
Notional ScheduleFeb 2013 Presidents Budget Submitted by President
April 2013 Concurrent BudgetResolution
Budget Committees; floor votes;conference committees; floorvotes
Spring to fall
2013
Defense Authorization:
Hearings, Markup, Votes
Armed Services Committees; floor
votes; conference committees;floor votes; to President forsigning
Spring to fall2013
Defense, MilitaryConstruction and Veterans:Hearings, Markup, Votes
Appropriation Subcommittees;floor votes; conferencecommittees; floor votes; toPresident for signing
Oct 1, 2013 Begin 2014 fiscal year
FY 2014 Emergency supplementalappropriations as needed
Appropriation Subcommittees;floor votes; conferencecommittees; floor votes; toPresident for signing
MIT Security Studies ProgramJuly 2013
38
-
7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713
39/41
Where the FY 2014 defense budget
stands in Congress this month
MIT Security Studies ProgramJuly 2013
39
Budget Resolution House passed its version on March 21
Senate passed its version on March 23
National Defense Authorization Act House bill passed on June 14
Mark-up passed Senate Armed Services Committee onJune 14
Defense Appropriation Act Markup passed House Appropriations Committee on
June 12
No action yet in full committee of Senate
-
7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713
40/41
Back-Up Slides
MIT Security Studies ProgramJuly 2013
40
-
7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713
41/41
MIT S it St di P 41
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
BillionsofD
ollars
Fiscal Year
The $487 Billion ReductionChange from FY 2012 Plan to FY 2013 Plan
Extended FY 2012 plan
Extended FY 2013 plan