williams slides for swamos 061713

Upload: deep-jyoti-barman

Post on 14-Apr-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713

    1/41

    U.S. Budgets for Defense and

    Security

    Cindy Williams

    Principal Research Scientist

    MIT Security Studies ProgramJuly 2013

    1

  • 7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713

    2/41

    Main Points

    MIT Security Studies ProgramJuly 2013

    2

    The United States spends more than $600 billionon defense each year, and close to one trilliondollars on national security

    Defense spending grew markedly between 1998and 2010, and has dropped in real terms since

    then The size of future defense budgets is uncertain Over the longer term, federal fiscal problems will

    probably lead to significant cuts in defensebudget

    Achieving the savings that are likely to be neededwill require significantly smaller forces and a shiftin national security strategy

  • 7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713

    3/41

    Overview of Talk

    U.S. defense and security budgets in perspective

    The Budget Control Act of 2011 and this years

    sequestration

    Federal fiscal pressures on the defense budget Cost growth inside the Department of Defense

    Shaping forces under significant cutbacks

    Budget Process 101: Planning and budgeting fordefense

    MIT Security Studies ProgramJuly 2013

    3

  • 7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713

    4/41

    National Defense BudgetBillions of Current Dollarsa

    Budget Function FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014Request

    Department of Defense

    Base Budget

    War Budget

    540

    115

    499

    81

    533

    88b

    Department of Energy

    Nuclear Weapons 18 18 19

    Defense-Related

    Programs 8 8 8

    050 National Defense 681 605 649

    a Total discretionary plus mandatory budget authorityb OMB placeholder

    MIT Security Studies ProgramJuly 2013

    4

  • 7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713

    5/41

    U.S. National Defense Outlays in

    Perspective

    Fiscal Year 2013, including cost of wars

    MIT Security Studies ProgramJuly 2013

    5

    About 40 percent of total world defense spending

    18 percent of federal outlays

    52 percent of federal discretionary outlays

    4.1 percent of gross domestic product (GDP)

    Excluding wars, about 30 percent higher in real terms than in2000

    Including wars, more than 50 percent higher in real terms

    than in 2000 Significantly higher in real terms than Cold War average

    Lower as a share of GDP than Cold War average

  • 7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713

    6/41

    MIT Security Studies ProgramJuly 2013

    6

    40%

    17%8%

    4%

    4%

    3%2%

    2%

    2%

    2%

    16%

    World Defense Spending in 2012

    United

    States

    NATO Allies

    China

    Russia

    Japan

    Saudi Arabia

    India

    Brazil

    South Korea

    Australia

    Rest of

    WorldSource: The Military Balance 2013,.

  • 7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713

    7/41

    MIT Security Studies ProgramJuly 2013

    7

    Non-DefenseDiscretionary

    16%

    NationalDefense

    18%

    Social Security22%

    Medicare/caid20%

    Other Mandatory17%

    Interest6%

    U.S. Federal Outlays in FY 2013(Total $3.7 Trillion)

  • 7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713

    8/41

    MIT Security Studies ProgramJuly 2013

    8

    0

    200

    400

    600

    800

    1000

    1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

    Billio

    nsofConstant2014Dollars

    Fiscal Year

    U.S. Outlays for National Defense

  • 7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713

    9/41

    MIT Security Studies ProgramJuly 2013

    9

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    40

    1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

    Percent

    Fiscal Year

    U.S. Outlays for National Defense(Share of GDP)

  • 7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713

    10/41

    MIT Security Studies ProgramJuly 2013

    10

    Security and International AffairsBudget Authority in Billions of FY 2014 Dollars

    FY 2001 FY 2014

    Request

    National Defense

    Base Budget

    Wars

    Total National Defense

    416

    0

    416

    561

    88

    649

    Homeland Security

    Total Homeland Security

    HS Spending in Defense Department

    Homeland Security Net of Defense Dept

    21

    5

    16

    73

    17

    55

    International Affairs 27 46

    Veterans Affairs 61 150

    Total 520 900

  • 7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713

    11/41

    Budget Control Act of 2011

    Put limits on security and non-security spending

    for fiscal year 2012 to fiscal year 2021

    Established a special Congressional committee to

    develop a plan for reducing expected federaldeficits by $1.2 trillion over ten years

    Established a poison-pill mechanism to take

    those reductions automatically if necessary For FY 2013, required that the poison pill be

    implemented through sequestration

    MIT Security Studies ProgramJuly 2013

    11

  • 7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713

    12/41

    Sequestration

    What it is: automatic cutbacks from appropriatedfunds that reduce every affected account by thesame percentage

    Affected accounts: national defense except formilitary personnel; non-defense discretionary;some Medicare and other entitlements

    How much in 2013: About 8 percent fromnational defense, 6 percent from non-defense

    discretionary How long: Only for FY 2013; for next 8 years, the

    administration and Congress have a choice

    MIT Security Studies ProgramJuly 2013

    12

  • 7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713

    13/41

    MIT Security Studies ProgramJuly 2013

    13

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    600

    700

    2001 2006 2011 2016 2021

    Discretionary

    BudgetAuth

    ority,FY2013

    $B

    Fiscal Year

    Non-War National Defense Budget Under Presidents

    FY 2013 and FY 2014 Plans and Budget Control Act

    President's FY 2013 Plan

    President's FY 2014 Plan

    Budget Control Act

  • 7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713

    14/41

    Federal fiscal pressures

    How did we get here?

    How bad could it be?

    What can be done about it?

    MIT Security Studies ProgramJuly 2013

    14

  • 7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713

    15/41

    MIT Security Studies ProgramJuly 2013

    15

    0.0

    5.0

    10.0

    15.0

    20.0

    25.0

    30.0

    1962 1967 1972 1977 1982 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 2012

    Fiscal Year

    Federal OutlaysPercent of Gross Domestic Product

    National Defense

    Non-Defense Discretionary

    Mandatory

    Interest

  • 7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713

    16/41

    MIT Security Studies ProgramJuly 2013

    16

    0.0

    5.0

    10.0

    15.0

    20.0

    25.0

    30.0

    35.0

    40.0

    45.0

    1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

    Fiscal Year

    Outlays and Revenues as Share of GDP

    (Percent)

    Revenues

    Outlays

  • 7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713

    17/41

    MIT Security Studies ProgramJuly 2013

    17

  • 7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713

    18/41

    MIT Security Studies ProgramJuly 2013

    18

  • 7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713

    19/41

    MIT Security Studies ProgramJuly 2013

    19

    Measures to avert unsustainable

    level of federal debt

    Increase revenues above projections

    Rein in entitlement spending

    Rein in discretionary spending

    Compared with current policy, need to shift4.8% of GDP by 2015 to keep debt at

    todays level for 25 years

  • 7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713

    20/41

    20MIT Security Studies ProgramJuly 2013

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    600

    700

    2001 2006 2011 2016 2021Discretionary

    NationalDefens

    eBA,

    FY

    2013$B

    Fiscal Year

    Fiscal Sustainability May Require Cuts

    Below BCA Levels

    President's FY 2013 Plan

    Budget Control Act

    Proportional Budget Cuts

    Equal Budget Cuts

  • 7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713

    21/41

    MIT Security Studies ProgramJuly 2013

    21

    Budget pressures inside Defense

    would push budgets upward

    Rising costs of health care for service

    members, families, and retirees

    Growing costs of military pay and

    allowances

    Rising cost of civilian pay

    Growing costs of new weapons

  • 7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713

    22/41

    MIT Security Studies ProgramJuly 2013

    22

    Military

    Personnel

    26%

    O&M

    40%

    Procurement

    19%

    RDT&E

    13%

    Other2%

    DoD Non-War Budget Authority by

    Appropriation Title, FY 2014 Plan

  • 7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713

    23/41

    MIT Security Studies ProgramJuly 2013

    23

  • 7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713

    24/41

    MIT Security Studies ProgramJuly 2013

    24

  • 7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713

    25/41

    MIT Security Studies ProgramJuly 2013

    25

  • 7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713

    26/41

    MIT Security Studies ProgramJuly 2013

    26

    Army

    24%

    Navy

    29%

    Air Force

    27%

    Defense-wide

    20%

    Military Departments' Shares of

    Defense Budget, FY 2014 Plan

  • 7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713

    27/41

    MIT Security Studies ProgramJuly 2013

    27

    0%

    10%

    20%

    30%

    40%

    50%

    60%

    70%

    80%

    90%

    100%

    FY 1980 FY 2000 FY 2010 FY 2014 FY 2018

    Plan

    Military Departments' Shares of

    Total Budget for the Services

    Air Force

    Navy

    Army

  • 7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713

    28/41

    MIT Security Studies ProgramJuly 2013

    28

    Possible Force Structure Options

    Current

    Plan

    Option 1 Option 2

    Budget Reduction ---- -10% -16%

    Distribution of Cuts ---- Proportional Rebalance

    toward Asia

    Active Army Brigades 37 32 (-14%) 26 (-30%)

    Navy Ships 300+ 250 (-17%) 235 (-22%)

    Active Marine Corps

    Divisions

    3 2+ 2+

    Air Force Tactical Squadrons 54 47 (-13%) 42 (-22%)

    Active-Duty End Strength

    (millions)

    1.3 1.2 (-10%) 1.1 (-17%)

  • 7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713

    29/41

    Planning and Budgeting for DoD

    MIT Security Studies ProgramJuly 2013

    29

    Three Players

    Department of Defense

    White House Congress

    The process takes more than two years

  • 7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713

    30/41

    DoD works on three budgets at a time

    MIT Security Studies ProgramJuly 2013

    30

    FY 2013 budget: in execution today, under

    sequestration

    FY 2014 budget: submitted two months late to

    Congress, in April 2013; request is underconsideration there

    FY 2015 budget: services now finishing work on their

    program objective memoranda (POMs); Office of

    Secretary of Defense will hold an integrated program

    and budget review this summer and fall

    DoDs internal process:

  • 7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713

    31/41

    DoD s internal process:Planning, programming, budgeting,

    and execution (PPBE) Creates Presidents Budget (one-year) and

    Future-Years Defense Program (FYDP, five

    years) Takes guidance from Quadrennial Defense

    Review (QDR), which must be submitted to

    Congress in February of second year of eachpresidential term

    MIT Security Studies ProgramJuly 2013

    31

  • 7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713

    32/41

    Purposes of PPBE

    MIT Security Studies ProgramJuly 2013

    32

    Executive management

    Civilian control of military

    Resource allocation

    Determine centrally where the money goes Rational process for exploring priorities and tradeoffs

    Make decisions based on explicit criteria of nationalstrategy, not compromises among institutional forces

    Consider requirements and costs simultaneously Consider multi-year plan, to project consequences ofpresent decisions into the future

  • 7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713

    33/41

    DoDs PPBE for FY 2015

    Planning phase (notional calendar)

    Nov 2012

    to Apr 2013

    Defense Planning and

    Programming Guidance

    (DPPG): priorities, broad

    guidance for capabilities,

    detailed guidance onprograms (consistent with

    National Security

    Strategy, QDR)

    Strategic Planning

    Council (SPC),

    Secretary of

    Defense

    Apr 2013 Fiscal guidance to

    services

    OSD CAPE, with

    Comptroller

    MIT Security Studies ProgramJuly 2013

    33

  • 7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713

    34/41

    DoDs PPBE for FY 2015

    Programming and Budgeting (notional)

    Apr to July

    2013

    Program Objective Memoranda (POMs),

    Budget Estimate Submissions (BESs)

    Services,

    Agencies

    Aug to Oct

    2013

    Integrated Program Review (policy) and

    Budget Review (pricing, executability)

    OSD CAPE,

    Comptroller;

    JCS; OMB

    Nov 2013 Final Program Decision Memoranda

    (PDMs) and Program Budget Decisions

    (PBDs) to Services

    Signed by

    Deputy

    Secretary

    Jan 2014 Presidents Budget and Future YearsDefense Program (FYDP) to OMB

    OSD

    Feb 2014 Presidents Budget and Future Years

    Defense Program (FYDP) to Congress

    OMB

    MIT Security Studies ProgramJuly 2013

    34

  • 7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713

    35/41

    Planning and budgeting in the White

    House

    National Security Staff: Writes the nationalsecurity strategy

    Office of Management and Budget (OMB)

    Develops fiscal guidance for federal departments(two years ahead of budget year)

    Participates directly in the DoDs internal budgetreview process

    President: signs authorization andappropriation bills into law

    MIT Security Studies ProgramJuly 2013

    35

  • 7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713

    36/41

    Planning and budgeting in Congress

    Four main processes

    Concurrent resolution on the budget (guides

    Congress; not a law)

    Reconciliation (only for revenues andentitlements)

    Authorization (establishes organizations and

    policy; authorizes for appropriation) Appropriation (provides funds)

    MIT Security Studies ProgramJuly 2013

    36

  • 7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713

    37/41

    MIT Security Studies ProgramJuly 2013

    37

    Authorizing

    Committee

    Budget

    Committee

    CBO

    Presidents

    Budget request

    Joint Economic

    Committee

    Conference

    Analysis

    Recommendations

    on Fiscal policy

    Estimate of spending

    and revenues in

    jurisdiction

    House/Senate

    Floor

    Concurrent Budget

    Resolution and

    Conference report

    Reconciliation

    Instructions

    Authorizing

    Committee

    Budget

    Committee

    Budget

    Resolution

    Conference

    SubcommitteesHouse/Senate

    Floor

    Budget

    Authority

    Authorizing

    Committee

    Appropriations

    Committee

    Reconciliation

    Bill

    Appropriations

    Bill

    Conference

    House/Senate

    Floor

    White House

    Conference

    House/SenateFloor

    Authorization

    Bill

  • 7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713

    38/41

    FY 2014 Budget in Congress

    Notional ScheduleFeb 2013 Presidents Budget Submitted by President

    April 2013 Concurrent BudgetResolution

    Budget Committees; floor votes;conference committees; floorvotes

    Spring to fall

    2013

    Defense Authorization:

    Hearings, Markup, Votes

    Armed Services Committees; floor

    votes; conference committees;floor votes; to President forsigning

    Spring to fall2013

    Defense, MilitaryConstruction and Veterans:Hearings, Markup, Votes

    Appropriation Subcommittees;floor votes; conferencecommittees; floor votes; toPresident for signing

    Oct 1, 2013 Begin 2014 fiscal year

    FY 2014 Emergency supplementalappropriations as needed

    Appropriation Subcommittees;floor votes; conferencecommittees; floor votes; toPresident for signing

    MIT Security Studies ProgramJuly 2013

    38

  • 7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713

    39/41

    Where the FY 2014 defense budget

    stands in Congress this month

    MIT Security Studies ProgramJuly 2013

    39

    Budget Resolution House passed its version on March 21

    Senate passed its version on March 23

    National Defense Authorization Act House bill passed on June 14

    Mark-up passed Senate Armed Services Committee onJune 14

    Defense Appropriation Act Markup passed House Appropriations Committee on

    June 12

    No action yet in full committee of Senate

  • 7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713

    40/41

    Back-Up Slides

    MIT Security Studies ProgramJuly 2013

    40

  • 7/30/2019 Williams Slides for SWAMOS 061713

    41/41

    MIT S it St di P 41

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    600

    700

    800

    2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

    BillionsofD

    ollars

    Fiscal Year

    The $487 Billion ReductionChange from FY 2012 Plan to FY 2013 Plan

    Extended FY 2012 plan

    Extended FY 2013 plan