wingra engineering, s.c.1 evaluation of gas turbine air quality impacts from a community perspective...
TRANSCRIPT
Wingra Engineering, S.C. 1
Evaluation of Gas Turbine Air Quality Impacts from a Community Perspective
Steven Klafka, PEWingra Engineering, S.C.
2002 Electric Utilities Environmental Conference
Wingra Engineering, S.C. 2
Introduction Recent deregulation of the utility industry
and the increased demand for electricity has resulted in the construction of new gas turbine generation stations throughout the U.S.
Wisconsin has been no exception with 37 new gas turbine stations and 14,990 megawatts of generating capacity proposed from 1998 to 2001.
Wingra Engineering, S.C. 3
Wisconsin Gas Turbine Projects
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
Proposed Turbine Capacity (MW)
1998199920002001
Wingra Engineering, S.C. 4
Community Reaction This has been the first experience of many
communities with new electrical generating facilities.
Some communities have rejected outright the construction of a new turbine station.
Others have accepted new stations after evaluation of the economic and environmental impacts.
Wingra Engineering, S.C. 5
Rejection of New Power Plants
Wingra Engineering, S.C. 6
Background A 1,050 MW combined cycle gas turbine generating
station was proposed for the Village of Pleasant Prairie, Wisconsin.
Merchant power plant selling electricity wholesale.
On behalf of the village, a review was conducted of the draft air pollution control permit and support documents.
Based on this review, the Village provided
suggestions to the WDNR for improving the project design.
Wingra Engineering, S.C. 7
Gas Turbine Site
Wingra Engineering, S.C. 8
Review of BACT Analysis Evaluation of Best Available Control
Technology analysis and comparison with control methods for similar turbine stations.
Concluded that the emission control methods and emission limitations proposed for the project represented BACT for recently constructed combined cycle gas turbines.
Recommended reductions in the emission limitations for VOC and H2SO4 to levels approved for a recent gas turbine project.
Wingra Engineering, S.C. 9
Approved Limits and Emissions
Air Pollutan
t
ControlMethod
DischargeLimitation
Emissions
(tons/yr)
NOx Low-NOx burners & SCR
3.5 ppmdv at 15% O2 522
CO Oxidation Catalyst 4.0 ppmdv at 15% O2 1,097
SO2 0.003% Sulfur Nat. Gas
4.5 lbs per hour per combustor
80
PM Natural Gas Fuel 30.5 lbs per hour per combustor
543
VOC Oxidation Catalyst 1.2 ppmdv at 15% O2 62
H2SO4 Same as SO2 2.8 lbs per hour per combustor
49
NH3 None 10.0 ppmdv at 15% O2 478
Wingra Engineering, S.C. 10
Review of Impact Analysis Evaluation of dispersion modeling analysis
used to determine compliance with air quality standards.
Verified modeling assumptions and procedures followed USEPA and WDNR protocols.
While the project complied with the National Ambient Air Quality Standards, it consumed the entire PSD increment for PM10.
Wingra Engineering, S.C. 11
Air Quality Impacts of Turbine Project
Wingra Engineering, S.C. 12
Review of Impact Analysis Recommended reduced emissions or
improved dispersion to allow future growth in the nearby industrial park.
Project proposed downwind VOC emission offsets due to location in ozone nonattainment area.
Recommended that offsets be obtained upwind of the project site to benefit village residents.
Wingra Engineering, S.C. 13
Review of Ambient Monitoring Reviewed proposed monitoring and recordkeeping
requirements.
Project was exempted from pre-construction ambient monitoring requirements based use of background data available from other counties in the state.
Recommended the project include post-construction monitoring to determine background air quality for the project location and surrounding county.
Wingra Engineering, S.C. 14
Review of Compliance Monitoring Recommended that the Village be kept
abreast of facility compliance.
Village should be provided copies of all pertinent air quality testing, monitoring and compliance certification documents.
Recommended compliance testing frequency be increased from every five to every two years.
Wingra Engineering, S.C. 15
Project OutcomeThe final air quality permit for the turbine
project did not incorporate any of the proposed recommendations including:
$ Reduced VOC and H2SO4 limitations.
$ Reduced PM10 increment consumption.$ Purchase of VOC offsets upwind of site.$ Post-construction monitoring.$ Shared monitoring & record keeping.
Wingra Engineering, S.C. 16
Project Outcome None of the Village’s
recommendations were incorporated into the project.
However, the Village concluded the recommendations provided leverage during negotiations for other aspects of the project such as infrastructure improvements and noise control.
Wingra Engineering, S.C. 17
Project Redesign Shortly after receipt of an air
pollution control permit, the project was re-designed from 4 to 3 turbines and 1,050 to 1,080 MW capacity.
The new project design incorporated several of the recommendations made on the original project.
Wingra Engineering, S.C. 18
Project Redesign Stack height was increased from 120 to 150
feet to reduce PM10 increment consumption.
Voluntary notification of Village staff when monitoring reports are submitted to WDNR.
Voluntary development of an industrial park consortium to monitor background air quality.
Wingra Engineering, S.C. 19
Pick Sides or Compromise