wisconsin forest habitat type classification system · wisconsin forest habitat type classification...
TRANSCRIPT
Forest Habitat Classification Workshop, Minneapolis, MN September 28, 1999
Wisconsin Forest Habitat Type Classification System
John Kotar, Joseph Kovach and Timothy BurgerUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison
Cover Types do not necessarily reflect site conditions e.g., a jack pine forest is not always “xeric”
anda sugar maple-basswood forest is not always “mesic”
Tsuga
VIBURNUM
H.T.SERIES
AVVbAQV
VACCINIUM ANGUSTIFOLIUM
PMVAcer rub.-Quercus rub.
COPTIS
TMC
10
10
9
8
SUGAR MAPLE
8
10
ATM
OSMORHIZA
AViO
2
1
10
7
5
5
RED PINE
JACK PINE1
Pinus strob. Acer saccharum
QUAKING ASPEN
MAIANTHEMUM CANADENSEACERIF.
QAE
EPIGAEA
MesicRichMedium
Very DryPoor
HEMLOCK
BALSAM FIR
Wet-MesicMed./PoorPoor
DryPoor
Dry-MesicMedium
IRONWOODBASSWOOD
WHITE ASH
Y. BIRCH
RED OAKRED MAPLE
WHITE PINE
Species occurrence on habitat types spanning the moisture-nutrient gradient
John Kotar, University of Wisconsin-Madison
Cover Types do not necessarily reflect site conditions e.g., a jack pine forest is not always “xeric”
anda sugar maple-basswood forest is not always “mesic”
Tsuga
VIBURNUM
H.T.SERIES
AVVbAQV
VACCINIUM ANGUSTIFOLIUM
PMVAcer rub.-Quercus rub.
COPTIS
TMC
10
10
9
8
SUGAR MAPLE
8
10
ATM
OSMORHIZA
AViO
2
1
10
7
5
5
RED PINE
JACK PINE1
Pinus strob. Acer saccharum
QUAKING ASPEN
MAIANTHEMUM CANADENSEACERIF.
QAE
EPIGAEA
MesicRichMedium
Very DryPoor
HEMLOCK
BALSAM FIR
Wet-MesicMed./PoorPoor
DryPoor
Dry-MesicMedium
IRONWOODBASSWOOD
WHITE ASH
Y. BIRCH
RED OAKRED MAPLE
WHITE PINE
Species occurrence on habitat types spanning the moisture-nutrient gradient
John Kotar, University of Wisconsin-Madison
Species 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35
Actaea rub 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 1 1Allium tri 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 1Amelanchier sp. 1 1 2 3 1 2 2 3 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 1 1 2Amphicarpa brac 1 2 3 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1Aralia nud 2 3 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 3 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 3 2 2 2 1Arisaema tri 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1Aster mac 1 1 2 3 1 2 2 2 1 2 3 1 4 4 1 1 2 4 4 2 1 2 1 3 2 2 3 1 4 1 3 4 2 1Caulophyllum thal 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 2Chimaphilla umb 1 2 2 1 1Cladina sp. 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 1 1Clintonia bor 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 2Comptonia per 4 3 3 4 3 4Corylus corn 3 1 3 4 1 1 4 3 1 2 3 1 2 1 1 2 3 2 1 3 2 2 2 1 1 2 4 2 2 2 3 2 1Desmodium glut 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 3 2 1 1Diervilla lon 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 2Dryopteris spin 2 2 2 3 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 2 2 2 1Epigaea rep 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1Galium bor 1 1 1 1 1 1 1Galium tri 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1Gaultheria pro 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 2 1 2 3 2 1 2 1 1 1 1Hamamelis virg 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 1Maianthemum can 1 2 4 1 4 1 2 1 1 3 2 4 4 1 2 4 2 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 3 4 2 4 3 1 1Melampyrum lin 2 1 2 1 2 1 1Osmorhiza clay 3 1 2 1 2 2 2 1 3 3 1 2 1 2 4 3Polygala pau 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1Pteridium aqui 3 1 4 1 4 2 1 3 3 1 2 2 1 4 3 2 4 3 4 3 2 2 1Rosa sp. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1Rubus sp. 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 3 2 3 2 1Sanguinaria can 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1Thalictrum dio 2 1 1 1 1 1 1Vaccinium sp. 4 4 1 4 2 4 2 2 1 4 1 2 4 4 4 2 3 1 1 1Viburnum acer 1 2 1 2 2 3 1 2 1 2 2 1 3 2Waldstenia frag 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 1 2 2 1 1 1
Plot number
Species 1 22 11 29 18 8 25 4 23 12 19 14 32 20 9 28 15 5 30 33 7 31 13 24 3 21 10 34 16 27 17 6 35 26
Maianthemum can 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 4 4 4 2 2 3 4 4 4 3 4 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1Aster mac 1 1 2 1 2 2 3 2 2 3 4 4 3 4 2 3 4 3 4 4 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 2Corylus corn 3 3 2 4 3 4 2 3 2 3 2 2 2 3 2 1 4 2 3 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1Rubus sp. 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 2 3 2 4 2 2 3 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1Amelanchier sp. 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 3 2 1 2 2 1 3 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 2 1Vaccinium sp. 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 2 1 2 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 1Gaultheria pro 1 1 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 3 2 1 2 1 1 1 1Waldstenia frag 1 2 2 1 2 3 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1Pteridium aqui 3 4 3 3 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1Diervilla lon 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 1Aralia nud 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 3 3 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 3 1 1 1 1 1Dryopteris spin 1 1 1 1 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1Clintonia bor 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 1Galium tri 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 2 1Melampyrum lin 2 2 1 1 2 1 1Epigaea rep 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1Comptonia per 4 4 4 3 3 3Cladina sp. 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 1 1Chimaphilla umb 1 2 1 2 1Galium bor 1 1 1 1 1 1 1Rosa sp. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1Viburnum acer 1 2 1 2 3 3 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 1Polygala pau 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 1Desmodium glut 1 2 1 1 2 3 1 2 1 1 1Hamamelis virg 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 1Amphicarpa brac 1 1 2 1 1 1 3 2 1 1 1Thalictrum dio 1 1 1 1 2 1 1Osmorhiza clay 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 3 3 2 4 2 1 2 3 3Caulophyllum thal 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 2Arisaema tri 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 1Actaea rub 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 2Sanguinaria can 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1Allium tri 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1
Plot number
John Kotar, University of Wisconsin-Madison
11
Ecological Species Groups of Northern Wisconsin's Upland Forests
8
9
10
1
2
3
4
Wild lily-of-the-valley
Shield fern
Downey yellow violet
Wet-Mesic
Sweetfern
Wild sarsaparilla
Blue cohosh
Viburnum
5
6
Moisture Dry Dry-Mesic MesicMedium Rich V. Rich Poor/Med .Nutrients Poor Poor Medium
Blueberry
Partridgeberry
Sweet Cicesly
Goldthread
John Kotar, University of Wisconsin-Madison
Very Rich
5
4
3
2
11 2 3 4 5
Rich
Medium
Poor
Very Poor
Very Dry
Dry
Dry-Mesic
Mesic
Wet-Mesic Wet
VeryWet
Soil
Nut
rien
t Reg
ime
Soil Moisture Regime
QArE
ArQV
PMV
AVVb ATM
TMC
AViO
ATD
Habitat Types of Wisconsin’s Region 3
John Kotar, University of Wisconsin-Madison
Very Rich5
4
3
2
11 2 3 4 5
Rich
Medium
Poor
Very Poor
Very Dry Dry Dry-
Mesic Mesic Wet-
MesicWet Very Wet
Soil NutrientRegime
Soil Moisture Regime
4
3
2
1
1 - Very Dry to Dry (VD-D)2 - Dry to Dry-Mesic (D-DM)3 - Dry-Mesic (DM)4 - Mesic (M)5 - Mesic to Wet-Mesic (M-WM)6 - Wet-mesic to Wet (WM-W)
6
North
5
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
VD-D
D-DM
DM M M-WM
WM-W
NORTH
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800 SOUTH
Growing Stock Volume per Acre by Habitat Type Group
Average volume per tree (cubic feet) across habitat type groupsVery Dry to Dry
Dry to Dry-Mesic Dry-Mesic Mesic
Mesic to Wet-Mesic
Wet-Mesic to Wet
Jack Pine 5.6 6.9Red Pine 7.8 12.0 9.4 9.3B.T. Aspen 9.2 12.4 11.7 14.1 11.0Q. Aspen 5.6 7.7 8.6 9.2 8.1 7.5Red Oak 7.3 10.3 14.6 19.6 15.9White Pine 18.3 22.8 43.2 28.1 19.9Paper Birch 7.1 6.8 8.5 7.1 5.7Red Maple 5.1 6.0 7.9 7.0 7.3Sugar Maple 7.7 9.6 8.7Basswood 9.3 12.7 12.9 *Yellow Birch 10.5 9.7 *Hemlock 15.5 12.9 *Balsam Fir 5.4 4.7 3.8White Ash 11.2 9.8 8.8N.W. cedar 6.8 5.2W. Spruce 10.4Black Ash 6.6 5.6Blk. Spruce 3.6Tamarack 5.3
North Very Dry to Dry
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
SM
B
RM
YB
WGA
E
WBO
RO
BPO
BLA
PB
BA
QA
H
NWC
BF
BS
WS
WP
RP
JP
T
%
North Dry to Dry-Mesic
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
SM
B
RM
YB
WGA
E
WBO
RO
BPO
BLA
PB
BA
QA
H
NWC
BF
BS
WS
WP
RP
JP
T
%
North Dry-Mesic
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
SM
B
RM
YB
WGA
E
WBO
RO
BPO
BLA
PB
BA
QA
H
NWC
BF
BS
WS
WP
RP
JP
T
%
Species Composition of the Northern Habitat Type Groups as a Percent of the Total Group Volume
North Mesic
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
SM
B
RM
YB
WGA
E
WBO
RO
BPO
BLA
PB
BA
QA
H
NWC
BF
BS
WS
WP
RP
JP
T
%
North Mesic to Wet Mesic
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
SM
B
RM
YB
WGA
E
WBO
RO
BPO
BLA
PB
BA
QA
H
NWC
BF
BS
WS
WP
RP
JP
T
%
North Wet-Mesic to Wet
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
SM
B
RM
YB
WGA
E
WBO
RO
BPO
BLA
PB
BA
QA
H
NWC
BF
BS
WS
WP
RP
JP
T
%
Species Composition of the Northern Habitat Type Groups as a Percent of the Total Group Volume
F
Short fire cycle
B
Moderate fire cycle
or special regeneration
techniques
C
Moderate fire cycle
White Oak
D
No Fire
Short fire cycle
E
Red Pine White Pine
Moderate fire cycle or
pine regeneration techniques
White Oak Red Maple White Pine (Red Oak)
White Pine Red Maple White Oak (Red Oak)
No Fire or
long fire cycle
G
Fire or
Clearcut
A
Aspen
Pin Oak Black Oak White Oak (Bur Oak)
Jack Pine or
Jack Pine with Aspen
No Fire or
Management
Forest Community Dynamics on Dry Sites (with or without management)
Fire
No Fire or
Management
No Fire or
Management
No Fire or
Management
John Kotar, University of Wisconsin-Madison
Oak regeneration techniques
applied
unmanaged or
managed
Mixed Oak Forest
Oak Savanna or
Opening
Recurring fire
Fire Suppression
Oak regeneration techniques
applied
Fire SuppressionFire
Mixed oak and invader
species
Oak regeneration techniques
applied
No management or
partial cutting of oaks only
Oak regeneration techniques
applied
Mixed oak and some
invader species
Mixed oak and Tolerant Hardwoods
Mixed invader species
-- No Oak --
Mixed Tolerant
HardwoodsSpecial
management
No management or
No oak regeneration techniques applied
Tolerant mesic species: Sugar maple Basswood White ash Bitternut hickory
Fire FirePresent Present
No management or
Partial cutting of Oak only
Absent Absent
Invading species:Black cherry Slippery elm Shagbark hickory Ironwood Red maple and many shrub species
No management or
high-grading or
single tree selection
Sugar maple dominated
mesic hardwoods
F G
D E
C
B
A
Forest Community Dynamics (with and without management) on Mesic and Dry-mesic Sites in Southern Wisconsin
John Kotar and Timothy Burger; Department of Forestry, University of Wisconsin-Madison
H
Size/age class ArDe-V AArL ATiDe-Ha ATiCa-Al ATTr
Large/ Old Aspen Aspen Aspen Aspen Aspen
Med./ Med.
Pin oak Black oak
Red oak White oak
Basswood White ash
White ash Basswood White ash
Small/ Young
Red oak White oak White pine
Red maple White pine White oak
Red maple Basswood
Sugar maple
White ash Basswood
Sugar maple
Sugar maple Y. birch Hemlock
Large/ Old
Pin oak Black oak
Aspen
Red oak White oak
Aspen
Basswood White ash
Aspen
White ash Basswood
Aspen
Sugar maple Y. birch
Aspen
Med./ Med.
White pine Red oak
White oak
Red maple White pine White oak
Basswood Red maple
sugar maple
Sugar maple Sugar maple Y. birch Hemlock
Small/ Young
Red maple White oak White pine
Red maple Ironwood
Sugar maple
Sugar maple Ironwood Basswood
Sugar maple Basswood Ironwood
Sugar maple Y. birch Hemlock
Large/ Old
White pine Red oak
White oak
Red oak White oak White pine
Sugar maple Basswood White ash
Sugar maple Basswood White ash
Sugar maple Y. birch Hemlock
Med./ Med.
Red maple White pine White oak
Sugar maple Ironwood Red maple
Sugar maple Basswood Ironwood
Sugar maple Ironwood Basswood
Sugar maple Y. birch Hemlock
Small/ Young
Red maple White oak White pine
Sugar maple Red maple Ironwood
Sugar maple Ironwood Basswood
Sugar maple Ironwood Basswood
Sugar maple Hemlock Y. birch
Late (80+)
Forest Community Matrix for Baraboo Hills
Habitat Type Successional
Stage
Early (30-50 yrs)
Mid- (50-80 yrs)
(John Kotar, University of Wisconsin-Madison)