wisconsin open meetings law

31
Wisconsin Open Meetings Law 1

Upload: kyra-holland

Post on 30-Dec-2015

19 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Wisconsin Open Meetings Law. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Wisconsin Open Meetings Law

WisconsinOpen Meetings Law

1

Page 2: Wisconsin Open Meetings Law

“In recognition of the fact that a representative government of the American type is dependent upon an informed electorate, it is declared to be the policy of this state that the public is entitled to the fullest and most complete information regarding the affairs of government as is compatible with the conduct of governmental business.” Sec. 19.81(1), Wis. Stats.

“This subchapter shall be liberally construedto achieve the purposes set forth in this section. . . .” Sec. 19.81(3), Wis. Stats.

2

Policy

Page 3: Wisconsin Open Meetings Law

● All meetings of all governmental bodies:

● Must be preceded by public notice

● Must be held in a place open to the public

● Must be held in a reasonably accessible place

● Sec. 19.81(2) and Sec. 19.83(1)

3

What does the law require?

Page 4: Wisconsin Open Meetings Law

GOVERNMENTAL BODIES

4

“Governmental body means a state or local agency, board, commission, council, department or public body corporate and politic created by constitution, statute, ordinance, rule or order; a governmental or quasi-governmental corporation . . . or a formally constituted subunit of any of the foregoing. . . .”

Sec. 19.82(1), Wis. Stats.

Page 5: Wisconsin Open Meetings Law

Governmental Bodies: What’s in?

The necessary minimum: (1) defined membership; (2) responsibility for aspect of government business; (3) expectation of collective action

Manner of creation, not nature of authority matters Lack of binding authority not relevant

Formally constituted subunits, subcommittees, or advisory bodies

Governmental and quasi-governmental corporations;e.g., economic development corporations

5

Page 6: Wisconsin Open Meetings Law

Governmental Bodies: What’s out?

Groups of government agency employees – most of the time

Bodies meeting for the purpose of collective bargaining

Bodies created by the Wisconsin Supreme Court

Offices held by a single individual

6

Page 7: Wisconsin Open Meetings Law

MEETINGS

7

“Meeting means the convening of members of a governmental body for the purpose of exercising the responsibilities, power or duties delegated to or vested in the body.

If one-half or more of the members of a governmental body are present, the meeting is rebuttably presumed to be for the purpose of exercising the responsibilities, authority, power or duties delegated to or vested in the body.

The term does not include any social or chance gathering which is not intended to avoid this subchapter. . . .”

Sec. 19.82(2), Wis. Stats.

Page 8: Wisconsin Open Meetings Law

Meetings: Key Concepts:

● A “meeting” takes place whenever:

● The number of members present is sufficient to determine the body’s course of action

● There is a purpose to engage in governmental business

● Members of a governmental body convene

8

Page 9: Wisconsin Open Meetings Law

Meetings: Key Concepts:“Numbers” Requirement

How many? Enough to determine course of action

Majority of membership

Quorum. One more than half of the members of the body unless rules provide differently

Governmental purpose is presumed where half of members present

Negative quorums

9

Page 10: Wisconsin Open Meetings Law

2007 OML Guide, p.2

Meetings: Key Concepts:“Purpose” Requirement

“Governmental business” is an expansive concept

Formal or informal action or discussion or learning

Information gathering on subject within the group’s authority

Personal interaction among members not necessary

Exclusions: “social” or “chance” gatherings

10

Page 11: Wisconsin Open Meetings Law

Purpose and Numbers: Trouble Spots

Social or chance gatherings? • Lunches

• Post meeting discussions

One-half presumption

Attending other meetings:

• Subcommittees and subunits

• Multiple Notices

11

Page 12: Wisconsin Open Meetings Law

Meetings: Key Concepts:“Convening” of Members

Critical question: how much does a particular communication resemble a face-to-face exchange?

Formal written correspondence? No. (e.g., hard-copy,formal letters, formal memos, sending out minutes)

Telephone conference calls? Yes.

12

Page 13: Wisconsin Open Meetings Law

Convening: Trouble SpotsElectronic communications: Email and Texts?

• number of participants; • number of communications;• time frame of communications;

• extent of conversation-like interactions

Walking quorums or serial quorums:

• Series of calls or conversations

• among individuals or small groups

• to act, determine or discuss business of the body

13

Page 14: Wisconsin Open Meetings Law

Notice & Open Sessions

14

Page 15: Wisconsin Open Meetings Law

Meeting Notices Who? When? What?

Every meeting of a governmental body shall be preceded by public notice . . ., Sec. 19.83(1), Wis. Stats.

Who #1: public, by posting or paid publication

Who #2: media who have requested notice

Who #3: official paper or other area news medium

When: 24 hours before meeting starts

When: “good cause” 2 hour minimum (rare)

What: time, date, place, and subject matter

15

Page 16: Wisconsin Open Meetings Law

Meeting Notices Meeting Notice Content

“Every ... notice ... shall set forth the ... subject matter of the meeting, including that intended for consideration at any contemplated closed session, in such form as is reasonably likely to apprise members of the public and the news media thereof.” Sec. 19.84(2), Wis. Stats.

“Reasonableness” standard is the key

General subject matter designations not permitted

16

Page 17: Wisconsin Open Meetings Law

Meeting Notices “Reasonable” subject descriptions

Factor #1: How hard is it to provide a more detailed notice? • Specificity must be compatible with the conduct of

government affairs

Factor #2: Is the subject matter of particular public interest?• Breadth and intensity of interest

Factor #3: Does the subject involve non-routine or novel action beyond public’s anticipation?

17

Page 18: Wisconsin Open Meetings Law

Meeting Notices: Some Rules of Thumb

Ask yourself: “Would a person interested in this topic be aware from reading the meeting notice that the subject would be discussed?”

How hard is it to be more specific and accurate? The better the subject description, the less likely a court will determine that the description was unreasonable

18

Page 19: Wisconsin Open Meetings Law

Open Session Requirements

“‘Open session’ means a meeting which is held in a place reasonably accessible to members of the public and open to all citizens at all times….” Sec. 19.82(3), Wis. Stats.

Accessibility: location; room characteristics; physical accessibility; persons with disabilities; teleconferences must accommodate public listening area.

Citizen participation: permitted; not required

Recordkeeping: motions, roll-call votes, announcements of closed session business

Recording: must be reasonably accommodated in open session

19

Page 20: Wisconsin Open Meetings Law

CLOSED SESSIONS________________

20

Page 21: Wisconsin Open Meetings Law

Closed Session

Rare: Use Sparingly

This is a Trouble Spot

Must be based on a specific statutory exception.

21

Page 22: Wisconsin Open Meetings Law

Closed Session ProcedureSec. 19.85(1)(a)

Motion+ Announcement (statute + nature of business)+ Roll Call Vote (unless unanimous)__________= Procedurally adequate closed session

presiding officer’s announcement must be made part of meeting record

22

Page 23: Wisconsin Open Meetings Law

Closed Sessions:Attendance & Voting

Who may attend a closed session? • all members of the body, including members of

parent body, if meeting is of subunit; • whoever else the body determines is necessary to

conduct the closed session business

Closed session voting: propriety unclear

DOJ recommends voting in open session, unless doing so will compromise the need for a closed session

23

Page 24: Wisconsin Open Meetings Law

Closed Session Justifications: ● Judicial or Quasi-judicial Deliberation. Discussion of a case which was the subject of any judicial or quasi-judicial trial or hearing before that governmental body. Sec. 19.85(1)(a)

● Employment and Licensing Matters.

• Considering or taking formal action on the dismissal, demotion, licensing, or discipline of any public employee or person licensed by a body. Sec. 19.85(1)(b)

• Considering employment, promotion, compensation, or performance evaluation data of any public employee. Sec. 19.85(1)(c) 24

Page 25: Wisconsin Open Meetings Law

Closed Session Justifications:

● Sensitive Reputation Information. Considering certain financial, medical, social or personal histories or disciplinary data of specific persons, or preliminary consideration of specific personnel problems or the investigation of charges against specific persons that would be likely to have a substantial adverse effect upon the reputation of the person if discussed in public. Sec. 19.85(1)(f).

• Only applies where a member has actual knowledge of information that will have a substantial adverse effect.

• Can only close for those parts of the discussion that involve the reputationally sensitive information

25

Page 26: Wisconsin Open Meetings Law

Closed Session Justifications:Competitive/Bargaining Interests: Deliberating or negotiating the purchasing of public properties, investing of public funds, or conducting other specified business, when competitive or bargaining reasons require a closed session. sec. 19.85(1)(e)

• Competitive/bargaining interests must leave the body with no option other than to close the meeting.

• Body has the burden to justify closure• Conclusory assertion is insufficient • Mere inconvenience, delay, embarrassment,

frustration or speculation is insufficient • Vendor or supplier request for confidentiality is

insufficient

26

Page 27: Wisconsin Open Meetings Law

Closed Session Justifications:Legal Counsel Advice. Conferring with legal counsel for the governmental body who is rendering oral or written advice about strategy to be adopted with respect to litigation in which it is or is likely to become involved. Sec. 19.85(1)(g).

• Body may rely on legal counsel’s opinion as to whether litigation is “likely” is sufficient

• Legal matter should be identified in meeting notice, unless there are specific strategic reasons for not identifying specific matter.

27

Page 28: Wisconsin Open Meetings Law

VIOLATIONS & ENFORCEMENT

28

Page 29: Wisconsin Open Meetings Law

2007 OML Guide, p.2

Enforcement Alternatives

District Attorney, county where violation occurred, after receiving verified complaint from individual

Private individual, after verified complaint filed with district attorney and no enforcement action filed after 20 days

Attorney General, where matter is statewide concern

29

Page 30: Wisconsin Open Meetings Law

2007 OML Guide, p.2

Enforcement: Violations & Remedies Key violation: “knowing” attendance at meeting held in violation of open meetings law

• Means positive knowledge, awareness, or conscious avoidance of awareness of illegality or that probability of illegality is high

• Civil forfeiture: $25 - $300 per member.

Other violations. (e.g., in adequate notice, improper closed session procedure)• Voiding action taken in violation of the law • Injunction to prevent future violations • Order to perform mandatory, non-discretionary duty • Courts costs and attorneys fees

30

Page 31: Wisconsin Open Meetings Law

Additional Open Meetings Resources

Download DOJ Outline and other resources free of charge, at www.doj.state.wi.us

Consult your legal counsel

31