w&m 2009 – building cost-efficient next generation microwave backhaul networks

32
Slide 1 Cost Effective Microwave Backhaul for Mobile Operators Mobile and Wireless 09 May 2009

Upload: ipexpo-online

Post on 15-Apr-2017

277 views

Category:

Technology


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: W&M 2009 – Building cost-efficient next generation microwave backhaul networks

Slide 1

Cost Effective Microwave Backhaul for Mobile OperatorsMobile and Wireless 09

May 2009

Page 2: W&M 2009 – Building cost-efficient next generation microwave backhaul networks

Slide 2Confidential Cambridge Broadband Networks Ltd.

The Company

Headquarters in Cambridge UK

Market-driven, world class technology

Research and product design in Cambridge

Manufacture by Benchmark in China

Delivering VectaStar solutions since 2001

Largest carrier-class PMP vendor, four-fold increase in sales 2007 to 2008

More than 50 customers in 35 countries

First Backhaul vendor sponsor to join NGMN Alliance

Page 3: W&M 2009 – Building cost-efficient next generation microwave backhaul networks

Slide 3Confidential Cambridge Broadband Networks Ltd.

Page 4: W&M 2009 – Building cost-efficient next generation microwave backhaul networks

Slide 4Confidential Cambridge Broadband Networks Ltd.

we are living in

exponential times

Page 5: W&M 2009 – Building cost-efficient next generation microwave backhaul networks

Slide 5Confidential Cambridge Broadband Networks Ltd.

Page 6: W&M 2009 – Building cost-efficient next generation microwave backhaul networks

Slide 6Confidential Cambridge Broadband Networks Ltd.

the number of text messages sent and received every day exceeds the total population

of the planet

Page 7: W&M 2009 – Building cost-efficient next generation microwave backhaul networks

Slide 7Confidential Cambridge Broadband Networks Ltd.

Mobile Data is Everywhere‘Hutchison-Whampoa’s 3 have seen their mobile broadband subscriber base increase by 305% in one year but their ARPU is down 16%!’

‘Network capacity is the issue, not the iPhone’

‘T-Mobile Ramps Up Backhaul In Readiness

for 3G HSDPA’

‘Mobile data right now is not a completely scalable model. When people use more data, we the operators incur enormous costs on backhaul.’ FranceTelecom/Orange

‘IPhone Influx Pushes AT&T to the Limit’

‘BlackBerry Storm Launch Crashes Verizon Network’

Page 8: W&M 2009 – Building cost-efficient next generation microwave backhaul networks

Slide 8Confidential Cambridge Broadband Networks Ltd.

Did you know

Page 9: W&M 2009 – Building cost-efficient next generation microwave backhaul networks

Slide 9Confidential Cambridge Broadband Networks Ltd.

Mobile operators want backhaul solutions

that cost less

Page 10: W&M 2009 – Building cost-efficient next generation microwave backhaul networks

Slide 10Confidential Cambridge Broadband Networks Ltd.

6 out of 10 cell sites in Europe will be backhauled by microwave in

2014

Page 11: W&M 2009 – Building cost-efficient next generation microwave backhaul networks

Slide 11Confidential Cambridge Broadband Networks Ltd.

the cost of microwave backhaul seems like a good place to start

reducing backhaul costs

Page 12: W&M 2009 – Building cost-efficient next generation microwave backhaul networks

Slide 12Confidential Cambridge Broadband Networks Ltd.

Alternatives are expensive $11.8B will be spent on leased backhaul in 2014

Page 13: W&M 2009 – Building cost-efficient next generation microwave backhaul networks

Slide 13Confidential Cambridge Broadband Networks Ltd.

Did you know

Page 14: W&M 2009 – Building cost-efficient next generation microwave backhaul networks

Slide 14Confidential Cambridge Broadband Networks Ltd.

There are two flavors of microwave backhaul

Page 15: W&M 2009 – Building cost-efficient next generation microwave backhaul networks

Slide 15Confidential Cambridge Broadband Networks Ltd.

Point-to-Point microwave networks require aggregation hubs to manage the traffic from multiple

links

Tree and branch architecture applied to reduce antenna count at hub: Link multiplier 1.38 radios to backhaul 3 sites (last link redundant)

Alternative is more hub sites

Site 3

Hub Site 1

Site 2

Hub

Point to Point provides a dedicated

link between two points

Page 16: W&M 2009 – Building cost-efficient next generation microwave backhaul networks

Slide 16Confidential Cambridge Broadband Networks Ltd.

It ends-up looking like

thisnumerous

links aggregated

into one place

Page 17: W&M 2009 – Building cost-efficient next generation microwave backhaul networks

Slide 17Confidential Cambridge Broadband Networks Ltd.

It was a good idea22 years ago

Page 18: W&M 2009 – Building cost-efficient next generation microwave backhaul networks

Slide 18Confidential Cambridge Broadband Networks Ltd.

Less than half the radios compared to PtP microwave, no requirement for

tree-branch complexity.Backhaul Spectrum is dynamically allocated to terminals as required

improving efficiency

Point to MultipointA single point

manages several points

Page 19: W&M 2009 – Building cost-efficient next generation microwave backhaul networks

Slide 19Confidential Cambridge Broadband Networks Ltd.

clearly Point to Multipoint must be a more cost effective way

to build a backhaul network

Page 20: W&M 2009 – Building cost-efficient next generation microwave backhaul networks

Slide 20Confidential Cambridge Broadband Networks Ltd.

It definitely uses fewer radios

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

Number of Cell Sites

Num

ber o

f Rad

ios

Number of PtP radios Tree & Branch PtP Point to MultiPoint

Page 21: W&M 2009 – Building cost-efficient next generation microwave backhaul networks

Slide 21Confidential Cambridge Broadband Networks Ltd.

Point to Point is the dominant form of microwave backhaul in Europe and the world.

(someone needs to wake up and smell the coffee)

Page 22: W&M 2009 – Building cost-efficient next generation microwave backhaul networks

Slide 22Confidential Cambridge Broadband Networks Ltd.

Mobile operators want backhaul solutions that cost less,

deliver higher performance and reduce the complexity of

their networks

Page 23: W&M 2009 – Building cost-efficient next generation microwave backhaul networks

Slide 23Confidential Cambridge Broadband Networks Ltd.

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 and onwards

LTE

DL: ~384KbpsUL: ~384Kbps

DL: ~14.4MbpsUL: ~5.76Mbps

DL: ~42MbpsUL: ~11Mbps

DL: ~141Mbps+UL: ~50Mbps

HSPA+~100 ms

~70 ms

~45 ms

~15ms

HSPA (HSDPA then HSUPA)

*Increasing Bandwidth *Decreasing LatencyHSPA+ and LTE Drive High Data Rate Capability

Note: Data rates shown are Peak per BTS sector – Not Achieved Uniformly In Practice

3G W-CDMA

Page 24: W&M 2009 – Building cost-efficient next generation microwave backhaul networks

Slide 24Confidential Cambridge Broadband Networks Ltd.

LTE Data Rates – What is Real – LTE Trial Data Says:

LTE Trial Initiative (LSTI) Data validates 150Mb/sec peak with 2X2 MIMO LTE SystemBut in the real world….1) There will be some level of interference from other cells2) The user will not always be close to the base station3) Cell throughput will be shared amongst several usersFor 10 users LSTI trial data concludes average throughput of 3Mb/s, cell edge 1Mb/s

1 user can obta

in Peak

rate near the BTS

Backhaul demands for LTE cell will vary between 30 Mb/s 150Mb/s

Page 25: W&M 2009 – Building cost-efficient next generation microwave backhaul networks

Slide 25Confidential Cambridge Broadband Networks Ltd.

Each Point-to-Point link needs individual planning. Cellsite links must be provisioned for peak traffic. LTE data rates put pressure on Spectrum requirements.

Site 3

Hub Site 1

Site 2

Point to Point requires traffic and bandwidth planning for each link

Site 5

Site 6

Site 4

Point-to-Point microwave networks require multiple aggregation points requiring additional hardware to manage the traffic from multiple links

Page 26: W&M 2009 – Building cost-efficient next generation microwave backhaul networks

Slide 26Confidential Cambridge Broadband Networks Ltd.

RNC-or-

BTS

Ethernet- or -SDH

Step 2: Each sector is an aggregation section using statistical multiplexingTraffic is aggregated over the air without additional hardware or complexity

Step 3: PMP base station acts as second, multi-sector aggregation pointExample: statistical multiplexing of multiple sectors further reduces bandwidth demand at the core network interface

Point to Multipoint reduces complexity; significantly improves efficiency

Step 1:Peak bandwidth is available to each cell site in the sector. Spectrum is shared in the sector reducing planning, eliminating wasteCapacity in the sector is dynamically allocated as required

Step 4: Transport capacity was saved by carrying aggregated traffic

Point to Multipoint simplifies mobile backhaul

Page 27: W&M 2009 – Building cost-efficient next generation microwave backhaul networks

Slide 27Confidential Cambridge Broadband Networks Ltd.

Statistical multiplexing and aggregation over the air

Traffic measurements from 4 Node Bs on HSDPA network

Point-to-Point backhaul provisioning would have to plan for peaks, i.e. 3 x E1 per NodeB: 3 x 2.048Mbps = 6.144Mbps per NodeB

4 x 6.144Mbps = 24.576Mbps

Up to 5x increase in available capacity

VectaStar stat-mux of optimised E1 traffic reduces peak backhaul requirement from 24.5Mbps down to 8Mbps

VectaStar PMP backhaul is highly suited to Node Bs with bursty traffic offering up to:

6Mbps

6Mbps

6Mbps

6Mbps

8Mbps

Page 28: W&M 2009 – Building cost-efficient next generation microwave backhaul networks

Slide 28Confidential Cambridge Broadband Networks Ltd.

Coverage – Flexibility

VectaStar is cost effective for new and overlay backhaul networks

Site a VectaStar PMP Ethernet Hub where there is a need to provide backhaul coverage

Add sectors as demand increasesHub economics enable variable sector sizes/capacitiesNew sites require one radio – deployment time halvedSingle platform handles high density and high traffic sites

Page 29: W&M 2009 – Building cost-efficient next generation microwave backhaul networks

Slide 29Confidential Cambridge Broadband Networks Ltd.

Clearly the next generation in microwave backhaul

LTE PMP Backhaul solution for London:•145 Cell sites•8 Hub sites•150Mb/s Peak•30Mb/s Mean

Utilises overlapping sectors to increase capacity in dense, high traffic areas

Page 30: W&M 2009 – Building cost-efficient next generation microwave backhaul networks

Slide 30Confidential Cambridge Broadband Networks Ltd.

Point to Multipoint microwave backhaul

costs lesshigh performance

reduces complexity

Page 31: W&M 2009 – Building cost-efficient next generation microwave backhaul networks

Slide 31Confidential Cambridge Broadband Networks Ltd.

Summary

Point to Multipoint is the lowest cost way to build dense microwave backhaul networks

On some vendors systems – the benefits become evident from 3 links onwards

Point to Multipoint delivers significant statistical multiplexing gainsIt is ideally suited for handling the nature of packet data traffic

Significant spectrum efficiency gainsTypically, PMP uses 50% less spectrum to cover a geographical area28MHz of microwave carrier bandwidth is utilised by many assets – not just one

Point to Multipoint reduces backhaul network complexity and planningNew zero-footprint vision is a paradigm shift in microwave network planning

Point to Multipoint delivers performance for today with capacity for tomorrow

Page 32: W&M 2009 – Building cost-efficient next generation microwave backhaul networks

Slide 32

Thank you!

Lance Hiley, VP [email protected]://twitter.com/cbnlwww.thebackhaulblog.com