wma 10 28 09

32
The Buffalo in the Room: Talking about the Tough Stuff at Native Museums Wednesday, October 28, 2009

Upload: kahikahiwa76

Post on 28-Jun-2015

254 views

Category:

Education


4 download

DESCRIPTION

Presentation: Buffalo in the Room

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Wma 10 28 09

The Buffalo in the Room:Talking about the Tough Stuff at Native

Museums

Wednesday, October 28, 2009

Page 2: Wma 10 28 09

Iolani Palace: Brief History

• 1810: Kingdom established

• 1845: New capital city

• The first “Palace”

• King Kalakaua

Page 3: Wma 10 28 09

King Kamehameha III (aka “Kauikeaouli”)

Page 4: Wma 10 28 09

Iolani Palace and Grounds

Downtown Honolulu

Page 5: Wma 10 28 09

The original “Hale Alii”(1845 – 1879)

Page 6: Wma 10 28 09

King Kamehameha V

• Ruled from 1863 – 1872

• Changed name from “Hale Alii” to “Iolani Palace”

Io + lani

Hawk Royal

Page 7: Wma 10 28 09

King Kalakaua(Ruled from 1874 – 1891)

Page 8: Wma 10 28 09
Page 9: Wma 10 28 09
Page 10: Wma 10 28 09

Completed in 1874, Aliiolani Hale served as the “seat of government” for the Kingdom of Hawaii.

Page 11: Wma 10 28 09

Aliiolani Hale today houses the Supreme Court of the State of Hawaii, Judiciary History Center, and law library.

Page 12: Wma 10 28 09

Some tough stuff

• Re-telling history / perspective

• Does education matter?

• Palace as an emotional symbol

• 50th Anniversary of Statehood

• Working with so many constituencies

Page 13: Wma 10 28 09

Why is Iolani Palace so controversial?

Page 14: Wma 10 28 09

Once upon a time . . . . .

August 12, 1898: Annexation of Hawaii

Page 15: Wma 10 28 09

The Palace as a venue to make a statement

July 28, 1934

Speech by President Roosevelt

April 30, 2007

Students visiting from theBig Island denied access

Page 16: Wma 10 28 09

Examples of uses inconsistent with a royal compound

April 28, 2007

Portable toilets on front driveway by group “Hawaiian Kingdom Government”

January 19, 2007

Protest banners on the grounds by group “Reinstated Hawaiian Kingdom”

Page 17: Wma 10 28 09

An arena for competing views on Statehood

Minutes later, the same group is surrounded by Hawaiian activists.

August 18, 2006

Pro-American group celebrates Hawaii’s admission as a state.

Page 18: Wma 10 28 09

One year later………

To avoid another showdown, we found something else to celebrate.

Page 19: Wma 10 28 09

Then in August 2008, just when we thought we had dodged a bullet......

Page 20: Wma 10 28 09

When interpreting

“tough stuff”

don’t add fuel to the fire.

(Unintentionally, of course.)

Page 21: Wma 10 28 09

An example:

Period room exhibit outside ofour comfort zone

Page 22: Wma 10 28 09

The King’s Library

Page 23: Wma 10 28 09

The Queen’s Imprisonment Room

Page 24: Wma 10 28 09

Only the Imprisonment Room has its

windows covered.

Page 25: Wma 10 28 09

What did we do for 2009?

Page 26: Wma 10 28 09

50th Anniversary of Statehood

• Appointment to Commission

• Advocate “commemoration”

• Change event venue

• Facilitate “alternative” events

Page 27: Wma 10 28 09

Protests….yes….but NOT at the Palace!

August 21, 2009Anti-statehood protest at the State Capitol

Similar protest at the Hawaii Convention Center

Page 28: Wma 10 28 09

Visioning Project

• How many groups?

• Silent but deadly…..

• Selecting the right consultant

• The term “museum” is a sensitive topic

Page 29: Wma 10 28 09

Visioning Project – General Observations

• Very strong emotional feelings attached (i.e. sacredness, tragedy, political injustice)

• Not all local residents feel welcome; have never visited

• Greater collaboration with other organizations and museums

• Feel strongly that the State has an obligation to fund, but not the Federal Government

• Acknowledge significant contributions by the Royal Family

• Do not support radical actions of some sovereignty groups, but understand why they did it.

Page 30: Wma 10 28 09

Active Engagement

• Be flexible (and broaden scope)

• Expect criticism

• Realize that the Board will move at slower pace

• Sometimes you have to confront opponents

• Sometimes, the “win” scenario is the losing scenario that is most tolerable

Page 31: Wma 10 28 09

In conclusion . . . . .

• Would a new Native Hawaiian government retake Iolani Palace?

• If we continue as a museum, from where should our future funding come?

• Can we remain relevant without becoming too political?

Page 32: Wma 10 28 09

Mahalo ia oukou a pau

loa!