workbook - bfar.da.gov.ph · abundance of invertebrates (e.g. crabs, shrimps, squids) in the catch...

PHILIPPINES

WORKBOOK

EAFM PLAN WORKBOOK2

EAFM PLAN WORKBOOK

FMA

Quezon City, Philippines

January 2017

MAINSTREAMING EAFM PROGRAM 3

d)Socio-economicconditionoffishers(stakeholdergroupsandtheireconomic statusandinterests;socio-economicbenefits,valuechains,etc.whereavailable).

e)Existingmanagementarrangements(usinggovernancebenchmarking)

f) Specialenvironmentalconsiderations(protectedarea,ancestraldomain, vulnerabilitytoclimatechange/disasters)

g)Institutionalaspects(suchasinter-LGUalliances,TWGs,etc.;currentsources offundingforexistingfisheries/CRMprograms)

h)Informationanddataneeds(gaps)

3. Majorissuesandproblems(Step2) • Priorityissuesandproblems(usingriskassessment)

4. Goals(Step2) • Goalstoaddressclusteredpriorityissuesandproblems

5. Objectives,indicatorsandbenchmarks(Step3) • Objectivesforeachgoal;indicatorsandbenchmarkstomeasure progresstoachieveobjectives(includingdataneedsanddatasources)

6. Managementactions(Step3)

Five Year EAFM Plan for _______________ FMA (Y1-Y5)

1. Vision(Step1) • Visionstatement,illustrationofcommonvision

2. Background(Step1) a) Description and map of the FMA - ecosystem boundaries, political jurisdictions,habitats,fishinggrounds,communities.

b)HistoryoffishingandmanagementintheFMA(timeline includinglaws/policies;perceptionofstatusoffishcatch/effort)

c)Currentstatusoffisheriesresourcesandfishinglivelihoods(baselinedataonfleets,gear,peopleinvolved)

LOW IMPACT

VERY LIKELY

LOW IMPACT

UNLIKELY

HIGH IMPACT

VERY LIKELY

HIGH IMPACT

NOT LIKELY

IMPACT

LOW HIGH

LIK

ELI

HO

OD

HIGH

EAFM PLAN WORKBOOK4

• Specificmanagementactionstoachieveobjectives

7. Proposedinstitutionalarrangements,communityempowerment,capacitybuilding(Step3) • Councils,alliances,taskforces,TWG,etc. • Stakeholderrightstoparticipateindecision-making(throughFARMC,andothers) • Strategyandplantobuildcapacitytoimplementmanagementactions

8. Monitoring,controlandsurveillance(MCS)framework/arrangements

9. Sustainablefinancing(Step3) • Estimatedcostsofimplementingmanagementactions • Sourcesoffundstofinancemanagementactions(budget,userfees,etc.) • Strategyforpoolingoffundsforinter-LGU/inter-agencymanagementactions

10.Implementationplanandcommunicationstrategy(Step4) • Strategyforcontinuingstakeholderengagement,especiallyindecision-making • Keymessagesandappropriatecommunicationstrategytargetingvariousaudiences to build consensus and support for the EAFM Plan and its implementation

11.MonitoringandEvaluation(M&E);reviewoftheplan–(Step5) • M&Eplanthatsetsmethodsandfrequencyofmeasurementofindicatorsundereachobjective.

12.ValidationandadoptionoftheEAFMPlan

ReferencesAnnexes

Management Action:

What management actions are currently being used?

EAFM plan objectives that will be addressed with this management action:

WhatAgency

Responsible (Who)

When Where action is implemented

Indicative Budget

Remarks

What specific tasks need to be done?

1) Role of BFAR and other national agencies

and / or

2) State the roles/tasks of LGUs with respect to their jurisdiction

Timeframe and Milestone

Complementary activities outside scope/jurisdiction of BFAR (i.e. which require inter-departmental cooperation) e.g. PAMB of NIPAS protected area


Five Year EAFM Plan for _______________ FMA (Y1-Y5)

(Y1______ to Y5______)

1. Vision

Visionstatement:

CommonvisionfortheFMA-whattheFMAwilllooklike20yearsfromtoday:

(paste photo print-out of workshop output here)

EAFM PLAN WORKBOOK6

2. Background–(includingbaselinedataandsources)

a) Descriptionofthefisheriesmanagementarea

Map of FMA (Google Earth or NAMRIA basemap – with overlays of coastal habitats, fishing grounds, municipal waters boundaries - include important human-related factors (including community locations, ports, tourism areas, etc.)


b)HistoryoffishingandmanagementintheFMA

Timeline:Significantrelevantevents(ecological,socio-economic,political),laws,regulations,plans,programs.

Significant events > 20 year ago

20 years ago

National Provincial

EAFM PLAN WORKBOOK8

National Provincial/LGU

PRESENT


c)Currentstatusoffisheriesresourcesandfishinglivelihoods-baselinedataonfleets,gear,peopleinvolved.

Fish catch and fishing effort (compared to 20 years ago)

Much Less/ smaller

About the Same Much More/ bigger

1. Fish catch (kilos per day of fishing)

2. Sizes of fish being caught

3. Proportion of high quality fish (grouper/ snapper) caught compared to overall catch

4. Availability/affordability of high quality fish in the local market

5. Proportion in catch/sale of juvenile (immature) fish

6. Proportion of catch of lower-value fishery species

7. Abundance of invertebrates (e.g. crabs, shrimps, squids) in the catch

8. Proportion sale and consumption of non-traditional food fish species, for example: _______________________________

9. Shells, invertebrates (sea cucumber, etc) gathered/collected: Note dominant species collected ________________________________

10. Number of hours to catch fish (per day)

11. Travelling distances to fishing grounds to catch fish (per trip)

12. Efficiency of fishing gear used (more catch - kilos - per trip)

13. Conflicts among competing fishers (municipal vs commercial; local vs foreign)

14. Conflicts among fishers and other coastal and marine resource users, e.g. for coastal development, tourism, transportation, etc.

15. Number of days not able to fish due to bad weather/ unsafe fishing conditions

•Insertprimaryorsecondaryscientificdataonfishcatch/effort(ifavailable)•InsertdatafromFishRandBoatRdatabasesonregisteredfishers,vesselsandgear.

EAFM PLAN WORKBOOK10

d)Socio-economicconditionoffishers

Socio-economic condition of fishers(compared to 20 years ago)

YES NO Remarks

1. Increase in price of fish (buying from fishers)

2. Increase in price of fish in the market

3. Increase profit from fishing livelihood - consider profit from value-adding (fish processing)

4. Income from fishing enough for daily household needs?

5. Increase in number of fishers in the community?

6. Increase in number of people moving to fishing from other livelihoods?

7. Children engaged in fishing (as fish workers, other than to help family)

8. Aspiration (positive attitude) about having fishing as a mean of livelihood for their children in the future

9. Displacement from settlement area and/or fishing ground?

10. Available reliable sources of income other than fishing?

11. Women involved in fishing livelihood

12. Sense of pride in carrying out fishing as a means of livelihood (Alt: Sense of pride in being a fisher).

13. Access to basic services: • Health center • School (elementary, high school) • Social welfare (MSWD) • Affordable credit (pautang) • Housing • Disaster warning/ prevention/ response

14. Available means of communication - with other fishers and/or traders

•Insertinformationfromsocio-economicsurveys,value-chainstudiesforimportantcommercialspecies,etc.(ifavailable)


e)Existingmanagementarrangements(governancebenchmarking)-putacheckmarkintheboxcorrespondingtotheLevelyourLGUisinforeachofthegovernancebenchmarks.

Governance Benchmark

Level 1Initiated at LGU

Level 2Sustained at LGU

Level 3Expanded ecosystem-

wide (inter-LGU)

Management boundaries established

LGU municipal waters delineated (map/chart prepared by NAMRIA)

Formal agreements on municipal waters boundary delineation with contiguous LGUs

Appropriate ecosystem-scale management boundaries established (fisheries management area; inter-LGU+BFAR)

Comprehensive fisheries management plan adopted and regularly updated

Comprehensive fisheries/coastal management plan developed and adopted for LGU (with corresponding legal and policy instrument)

Comprehensive fisheries/ coastal management plan implemented (with initial budget, implementation plan, etc)

EAFM plan for FMA adopted and implemented (inter-LGU+BFAR)

Marine spatial planning to reduce use conflicts

Fisheries and other uses identified and zoning plan developed

Fisheries use zoning plan implemented (with corresponding legal or policy instru-ment) and monitored

Fisheries use zoning plan improved, sustained and objectives attained (e.g. conflict reduced)

Fisheries management office established and operational

Fisheries/CRM officer in LGU designated (by EO or ordinance) with clear man-date, staff and logistical support

Fisheries/CRM office established (by ordinance), with regular staff and budget.

Inter-LGU (+BFAR) alliance, council, etc. established to cover FMA

Fisheries registration and licensing system established

Fishers, boats and fishing gears registration (using FishR and BoatR) and licensing system established (ordinance)

Fishers, boats, and fishing gears registration and licensing system implemented and enforced within LGU; may include reciprocation arrangements with contiguous LGUs

Registration and licensing system used to regulate fishing effort at FMA-scale (towards right-sizing)

Coastal marine habitat management established

Coastal marine habitat baseline assessment conducted and habitat profile developed

Coastal marine habitat monitoring conducted regularly and appropriate management actions implemented

FMA-scale habitat monitoring and management (as part of EAFM Plan)

Fisheries management established

Fisheries baseline assessment conducted and fisheries profile developed

Fisheries monitoring conducted regularly and feedback to stakeholders and resource users; appropriate species- and/or gear-specific manage-ment actions implemented

FMA-scale fisheries monitoring and management (as part of EAFM Plan)

Network of Marine Protected Areas (MPA) established

Individual MPA or MPAs established, baseline data collected, MPA manage-ment plan implemented, and monitoring system established

Individual MPA or MPAs sustained and MPA network arrangements established

MPA network arrangements implemented, enforced and sustained (as part of EAFM Plan)

Fisheries Law enforcement team and program established

Fisheries law enforcement team and law enforcement program established

Fisheries enforcement operations regularly conducted (with operation plan) and enforcement database established

Collaborative enforce-ment with LGU alliance/ inter-LGU/inter-agency FLE task force; FMA-wide

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9


Governance Benchmark

Level 1Initiated at LGU

Level 2Sustained at LGU

Level 3Expanded ecosystem-

wide (inter-LGU)

Local constituencies for fisheries management organized and actively involved (fisherfolk, CSOs, private sector)

Local constituencies for fisheries management engaged in consultations/ planning; FARMC established

Local constituencies for fisheries/coastal manage-ment actively participating in management planning and implementation

Local constituencies for fisheries management expanded and organized FMA-wide; actively participating in EAFM planning and implementation

10

11 Multi-institutional collaboration on fisheries/coastalresources management

LGU engagement with other agencies (BFAR, DENR, etc) re comprehensive F/CRM (e.g TWG)

Formalized LGU engagement with other agencies and contiguous LGUs (with regular budget support, joint programs)

Multi-institutional collaboration on CFRM sustained (formalized as alliance, council, etc) with budget, staff, M&E

12 Sustainable financing for Fisheries/ CRM

LGU budget dedicated for F/CRM (any amount)

Business plan (budget + other revenues) to fund implementation of EAFM plan at LGU level

Business plan (with sharing of budget and revenues) to implement EAFM plan at FMA-scale

13 Revenue generation established

Revenue generation system on CRM/fisheries manage-ment initiated (any amount)

Revenue-generating measures effectively implemented and enforced (based on resource rent?)

Revenue-generating measures sustained to support implementation of EAFM plan (FMA-scale)

Incentives (disincentives) scheme to change behavior

Incentives/disincentives scheme initiated (awards, rewards, fees and charges to provide incentive to desired behavior or disincentive to reduce undesired behavior)

Incentives/disincentives scheme established and showing positive results (verifiable behavior change)

Incentive/disincentive scheme adapted FMA-wide and showing positive results (verifi-able behavior change)

Coastal environment-friendly enterprises established

Coastal environment-friendly enterprises initiated (any)

Coastal environment-friendly enterprises established and showing positive results in reducing fishing pressure and/or increasing ‘incomes’ at LGU level.

Coastal environment-friendly enterprises established and showing positive results at FMA-scale.

14

15

f) Specialenvironmentalconsiderations(e.g.ifpartofNIPAS,ancestral domain;considerationofhazards,etc.)

g) Institutional aspects (such as inter-LGU alliances, TWGs, etc.; current sources of funding for existing fisheries/ CRM programs)


f) Specialenvironmentalconsiderations(e.g.ifpartofNIPAS, ancestraldomain;considerationofhazards,etc.)

Information/ Data Needed [make sure to cover biophysical, socio-economic and governance data needs]

Readily available

Available from other sources

Not available

Geographic areas to be managed (e.g. municipal water boundaries)1. Coastal Terminal Points2. Maps

Location, extent and boundaries of critical fish habitats (coral reefs, mangroves, seagrass, estuaries)1. Habitat maps

Status and condition of critical fish habitats (coral reefs, mangroves, seagrass, estuaries)

Major commercial or most important species (e.g. fishes, invertebrates, seaweed)

Inventory of fishing activities (e.g. gears, fishers, vessels)

Records of illegal fishing practices/methods

Data on fish catch over a 5-year period

Data on catch per unit effort (CPUE) for various fishing gears

Major problems/ threats to fisheries (from previous workshops, projects, etc)

Profile of resource users (fishers, … - from previous workshops, projects, etc)

Basic management measures initiated

Law enforcement records

MPAs/ Fish Sanctuary (establishment records, monitoring data)

Gear and species specific management (records)

Fisheries registration (fishers, boats, gear) – FishR and BoatR data

Zoning of municipal water uses (establishment records, monitoring data)

Population and their demographic profiles

Livelihood profile, occupations, or sources of income

Locations of social infrastructures that are relevant, e.g.. ports, landing sites, main markets, and other competing uses.

Others: (pls. specify)__________________________


3. Major issues and problems

LOW IMPACT

VERY LIKELY

LOW IMPACT

UNLIKELY

HIGH IMPACT

VERY LIKELY

HIGH IMPACT

NOT LIKELY

IMPACT

LOW HIGH

LIK

ELI

HO

OD

HIGH

Low impact/ Very Likely High impact/ Very Likely

Low impact/ Unlikely High impact/ Unlikely


4. Goals (for the FMA)

Issue cluster Issues and problems covered Goal

1) a)

b)

c)

d)

2) a)

b)

c)

d)

3) a)

b)

c)

d)

4) a)

b)

c)

d)


5. Objectives, indicators and benchmarks – including data needs and data sources for M&E

Goal

1)

Objectives Indicators Benchmarks


Goal

2)



Goal

3)



Goal

4)



6.Management actions

Management Action:



WhatAgency

Responsible (Who)


IndFicative Budget

Remarks

What specific tasks need to be done?

1) Role of BFAR and other national agencies

and / or

2) State the roles/tasks of LGUs with respect to their jurisdiction

Timeframe and Milestone

Complementary activities outside scope/jurisdiction of BFAR (i.e. which require inter-departmental cooperation) e.g. PAMB of NIPAS protected area


Management Action:



WhatAgency

Responsible (Who)


Indicative Budget

Remarks


7.Proposed institutional arrangements (+community empowerment, capability building)

Shortdescription/bulletpointsonnew/modifiedinstitutionalarrangements,ifdifferentfrom

2(g);strategiesforcommunityempowerment,capabilitybuilding,socialpreparation,etc.

8. Monitoring, control and surveillance (MCS framework/ arrangements)


9.Sustainable financing (from business planning)

a)Estimatedcostsofimplementingmanagementactions

b)Sourcesoffundstofinancemanagementactions(budget,userfees,etc.)

c)Strategyforpoolingoffundsforinter-LGU/inter-agencymanagementactions

10. Implementation plan and communication strategy

a) Strategyforcontinuingstakeholderengagement,especiallyindecision-making

Notesonnextstepstoimplementtheplan(e.g.presentEAFMPlantoRegionalDevelopment

Council;draftEOorordinancetoimplementcomponentsoftheplanintheLGUincluding

appropriation of funds)


b)Keymessagesandappropriatecommunicationstrategytargetingvariousaudiencestobuild consensus and support for the EAFM Plan and its implementation

TARGET AUDIENCE

COMMUNICATION METHOD(HOW & WHERE)

KEY MESSAGES TIMING


11. Monitoring and Evaluation; review of the plan

Goal 1

OBJECTIVE 1

Indicator Monitoring frequency Monitoring methodEvaluation (notes on

progress or issues to address)

OBJECTIVE 2



OBJECTIVE 3



OBJECTIVE 4




Goal 2

OBJECTIVE 1



OBJECTIVE 2



OBJECTIVE 3



OBJECTIVE 4




Goal 3

OBJECTIVE 1



OBJECTIVE 2



OBJECTIVE 3



OBJECTIVE 4




Goal 4

OBJECTIVE 1



OBJECTIVE 2



OBJECTIVE 3



OBJECTIVE 4




12. Validation and Adoption of the EAFM Plan

Shortdescriptionoftheprocessofformulation,validationandadoptionoftheEAFMPlan

•EAFMTeamStart-up-date

•PreparationoftheDraftEAFMPlan-date

•Validationworkshop(s)-date(s)

•PresentationtoLGUs,RDC,etc.(dates)

ReferencesAnnexes


BUREAU OF FISHERIES AND AQUATIC RESOURCES

PCA Building, Diliman, Quezon City, Philippines

[email protected]

workbook - bfar.da.gov.ph · abundance of invertebrates (e.g. crabs, shrimps, squids) in the catch...

Documents