working lands programs food, conservation, and energy act of 2008 jim pease dept of agricultural...
Post on 19-Dec-2015
217 views
TRANSCRIPT
Working Lands ProgramsFood, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008
Jim PeaseDept of Agricultural & Applied Economics
Virginia Tech
[email protected]/231-4178
2
From Aillery, M. “Contrasting Working-land and Land Retirement Programs, Economic Brief No. 4, ERS/USDA, March 2006
Principal “Working Lands” Programs
• Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP). Funding (“to the maximum extent practicable”) FY2008-2012 is $7.325 billion
• Conservation Stewardship Program (CSP). Funding (“to the maximum extent practicable”) for 12.769 million acres enrollment per year over FY2009-2017 at average contract payment of $18/acre
3
Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP)
4
Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP)
• Voluntary program providing financial and technical assistance to protect water, air and soil quality and wildlife habitat by implementation and management of conservation practices on livestock and cropping operations
• Conservation practices include: – Structural– Land management– Vegetative– Forest management– Conservation plan development
• Emphasis on assisting livestock operations to meet regulatory requirements, available nationally, no previous conservation practice required
5
6
EQIP Principal Changes• Increased funding FY2008-2012 to $7.325 billion• Allows practices related to:
– livestock air quality concerns– organic transition or production– water conservation/irrigation efficiency
practices – comprehensive Nutrient Management Plan
• Agricultural Water Enhancement Program to fund water quality and water conservation activities
• Payment limit reduced to $300,000• Modifies evaluation process of contract proposals
7
EQIP Land Eligibility
– Land which agricultural commodities, livestock, or forest-related products are grown, including cropland, grassland, rangeland, and pasture land
– Other private agricultural land, such as cropped woodland, marshes, or agricultural land used for livestock production
– Nonindustrial private forest land
8
Ranking of EQIP Applications Based on:
• Cost-effective• Comprehensive and effective• Fulfill EQIP purpose• Improve conservation practices/
systems
(similar crop/livestock operations grouped for evaluation)
9
EQIP Contracts
• Term 1-10 years• Payments cover costs of
structures/practices (max 75%) and income foregone (max 100%)– For limited resource, beginning, or socially
disadvantaged producers, payments for costs incurred are lesser of 25% over the regular rate, or 90%
• Payment limit $300,000/person over 6 years
10
Conservation Stewardship Program (CSP)
11
Conservation Stewardship Program (CSP)
• Voluntary program providing payments for maintenance/adoption of conservation practices that – Address a state-defined resource concern– Are operated beyond a threshold
resource/environmental management level • Replaces/revamps the 2002
Conservation Security Program beginning FY2009– Tiered payment system eliminated– Watershed-based eligibility eliminated
12
CSP Land Eligibility
– Private agricultural land, including cropland, grassland, prairie land, improved pasture, rangeland, and agro-forestry land
– Forested land incidental to agricultural operation
– Other private agricultural land, such as cropped woodland, marshes, or agricultural land used for livestock production
– Tribal agricultural land– Nonindustrial private forest land
13
CSP Priority Resource Concern
• 3-5 resource concerns identified by NRCS in consultation with a state Technical Committee as priority for a watershed or other area within the state
14
CSP Funding Allocation
• Allocation by state based on: – proportion of national eligible acres– conservation needs in each state– expected effectiveness of program
implementation– other regional equity considerations.
• Requirement of 5% funding for beginning producers and 5% for socially disadvantaged producers
15
Conservation Stewardship Plan
• Must have met threshold of at least 1 resource concern
• Must propose to meet/exceed stewardship threshold of at least 1 priority resource concern by installing/adopting conservation activities and improving/maintaining /managing conservation activities
16
Ranking of CSP Applications Based on:
• Level of conservation treatment• Effectiveness of proposed
conservation treatment on priority resource concerns
• Number of priority resource concerns proposed
• Other resource concerns addressed• Benefit/cost relative to other
proposals
17
CSP Contracts• Continuous enrollment• 5-year term, renewable for another 5• Annual payments based on costs incurred,
income forgone, and environmental benefits• Specialty crop and organic producers may
participate• CSP payments now allowed for:
– organic certification– on-farm conservation research/demonstration or
pilot testing• Supplemental CSP payments for resource-
conserving crop rotations• Payment limitation $200,000 total over 5
years 18
Critical Elements of Working Lands Programs
• Annual Congressional appropriations?• Program access, benefit/cost affected by state
allocation• EQIP:Program requests exceed funding 4:1• CSP:USDA “reliable conservation measurement
tools”?• Technical assistance availability?• “Stickiness” of conservation practices after
contract expires?• Enrollment with current high commodity prices?
19
Final Notes
• Environmental Services Markets: Mandate for USDA to develop technical guidelines for measuring and reporting environmental services on farm, ranch, and forest lands; and guidelines for registry of benefits; priority for emerging carbon markets
• Chesapeake Bay Program watershed funding $188m FY2009-2012
20