working paper v
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/7/2019 Working Paper V
1/39
Working Paper 5
BioDistrict New Orleans
VisioningDecember 2010
-
8/7/2019 Working Paper V
2/39
2 December 2010Working Paper 5 Table of Contents
01 02
Task 5 Overview
07
Purpose of the Visioning
Workshops
07
Format of the Visioning
Workshops
Visioning Workshop
Findings
11
Workforce Development
Workshop Findings
13
Community Benefi ts
Agreement Workshop
Findings
14
Community Visioning
Workshop Findings
Section:
Table of Contents
03
Vision Statement
19
BioDistrict Vision
Statement
-
8/7/2019 Working Paper V
3/39
3
Acknowledgement
The AECOM team would like to acknowledge
the GNOBEDD Board and staff for their input and
engagement during this Task. This report has also been
developed in coordination with the entire AECOM
team. The team includes: EDAW / AECOM, AECOM
Economics, AECOM Transportation, Bright Moments,Cannon Design, CBRE, Chester Engineers and The
Ehrhardt Group.
04
Appendix
A
Sign-In Sheets
-
8/7/2019 Working Paper V
4/39
4 December 2010Working Paper 5 Table of Contents
-
8/7/2019 Working Paper V
5/39
5
Section 01:
Task 5 Overview:
Visioning
Workshops
-
8/7/2019 Working Paper V
6/39
6 December 2010Working Paper 5 Task 5 Overview
BioDistrict New Orleans. The Louisiana Superdome, New Orleans Arena and key existing and
proposed institutional developments are shown in blue.
-
8/7/2019 Working Paper V
7/39
7
Task 5 Overview: Visioning WorkshopsPurpose of the Visioning Workshops
The purpose of Task 5, Visioning the Future, was to work
with community stakeholders to develop a long term
vision of what BioDistrict New Orleans can become
over the next 20 years. During the Week of September
13th, four visioning sessions were held with over
150 stakeholders to look at possible futures for the
BioDistrict, while considering: (1) changing needs and
relationships; (2) changing employment and needs in
training; (3) changing technology; and (4) operational andfunctional effi ciencies.
Dates, times and locations of the various meetings are
provided below.
September 14, 2010, 2-4 pm, Workforce
Development Workshop, United Way Building,
2515 Canal Street
September 14, 2010, 6-8 pm, Community Visioning
Workshop #1, Tulane University, Diboll Auditorium,
1440 Canal Street
September 15, 2010, 6-8 pm, Community Benefi ts
Agreement (CBA) Workshop, New Orleans
BioInnovation Center, 134 LaSalle Street
September 16, 2010, 6-8 pm, Community Visioning
Workshop #2, Xavier University Center, Grand
Ballroom, 1 Drexel Drive
Stakeholder sign-in sheets can be found in Appendix A.
Format of the Visioning Workshops
During each of the Visioning Workshops the following
topics were discussed: the background on BioDistrict
New Orleans, including the history of the organization,
how it was formed and its mission; a defi nition of the
term biosciences and how it directly applies to the
BioDistrict; the purpose of the BioDistrict Plan and where
we are to date in the planning process; and a summary
of the actions and fi ndings from the fi rst four tasks
of the project which comprised Phase 1 (Stakeholder
Interviews, Data Gathering, Inventory and Analysis, and
Programming).
For both the Workforce Development and CBA Visioning
Workshops, the AECOM Team developed specifi c
questions that were tailored to each of the two groups
to focus the discussion on topics specifi cally related toeducation/training and CBAs, respectively. Questions
asked and discussion summary notes for these two
sessions are found in Section 2.
For the Community Visioning Workshops, round table
breakout sessions were envisioned. However, given the
poor space layout for Workshop #1, breakout sessions
were not conducted. Rather a town hall type forum was
held with community stakeholders. The community noted
that the venue was not conducive to interactive dialogue
with the AECOM planning team, which the planning teamacknowledged. For all future meetings, the planning team
has taken extra care to ensure that venues with fi xed
seating are not used in public forums.
For the second Community Visioning Workshop, the space
allowed for the visioning breakout sessions to occur as
originally planned. The breakout sessions lasted just
over an hour and consisted of round-robin introductions,
discussions on a variety of topic areas, and report out
to the larger stakeholder group of the tables fi ndings
by a team spokesperson. Findings from the Community
Visioning Workshops are found in Section 2.
-
8/7/2019 Working Paper V
8/39
8 December 2010Working Paper 5 Task 5 Overview
Stakeholder discussion during the Workforce Development Visioning Workshop.
-
8/7/2019 Working Paper V
9/39
9
Section 02:
Visioning Workshop
Findings
-
8/7/2019 Working Paper V
10/39
-
8/7/2019 Working Paper V
11/39
11
Visioning Workshop FindingsWorkforce Development VisioningWorkshop Findings
The AECOM Team had an excellent discussion with the
stakeholders participating in the Workforce Development
Visioning Workshop. To help spur the discussion, the
AECOM Team posed the questions below based on
the fact that over 22,000 bioscience related/spin-off
jobs are estimated to be created by 2030, not including
construction and non-direct job creation.
Are we ready today for the BioDistrict jobs thatwill become available in 2014? If not, what will it
take to make us ready?
How do we connect BioDistrict, City and Parish
residents with these jobs?
Do we have a comprehensive, collaborative
Placement Program? If not, how do we create
one?
Are our higher education institutions adequately
educating New Orleanians for the types of jobs
available in the future?
Do we have the right mix of programs to
train residents? If not, how do we create
a comprehensive, coordinated menu of
programs?
What would better prepare New Orleans to
compete in the 21st Century?
The following is a summary of the key points generated
during the workshop discussion.
Education:
Students coming out of public school need to be
successful. Can there be a pipeline or career
pathway created so that they can get jobs or
internships in the BioDistrict upon graduation or
during summer breaks? Can strong math and
science high school programs be established at such
schools as Warren Easton?
The success of the BioDistrict is in part dependent
on the State not reducing funding for research.
Research funding gaps should be met through
a dedicated fund (e.g. part of an endowment), so
researchers are not dependent on consistent grant
funding.
Millions in new taxes could be generated if the
bioscience industry and other research areas are
supported. However, this may require some seed
funding
Community college programs with focus on LPN not
RN slanted towards clinical trials.
Education institutions need to respond to employers
needs so that graduates can be appropriately trained
to meet the requirements of jobs available in the
BioDistrict.
There are currently not enough testing centers
in New Orleans to allow students to take the
G.E.D. exam. Most travel out of state, primarily
Mississippi, to sit for the exam. Funding the
establishment of such a facility in New Orleans
should be a top priority.
There should be no cannibalism of trained
students/workers by institutions.
Workforce / Jobs Training:
Training should be focused on excellence in multiple
areas.
If projects came online today, there could be a
workforce capacity gap requiring the importation of
workers from outside of the BioDistrict, region or
state. There is therefore a strong need to help grow
the existing workforce, especially mid-level workers.
Some training programs already exist or are in the
-
8/7/2019 Working Paper V
12/39
12 December 2010Working Paper 5 Workshop Findings
process of being created. Recruitment programs
should also be established to help meet the need.
Need collaboration and partnership among
workforce training organizations to make it
easy for job seekers to understand the types of
jobs available and get the training they require.
The current workforce development system is
dysfunctional with little communication between
businesses, institutions, schools, job centers, or
economic development organizations.
In order to effectively place job candidates theworkforce needs to match industry needs to
acquire accurate information on the timing of
projects; and to create and maintain a centralized
site listing job opportunities. The latter could be
provided on the BioDistrict New Orleans website.
Information sharing is critical in order to prepare
the workforce for the types of jobs that are going
to be created. The Healthcare Sector Coordinator
for the region does not have information regarding
the number and types of jobs being created by the
VA and UMC hospitals.
There may be a need for an ombudsman for jobs/
workforce training for the BioDistrict.
Community Engagement:
Improve messaging to provide a clear and
consistent message of what the BioDistrict is
and what it means to the community. This will
encourage community buy-in and support.
The evolution of the BioDistrict is a dynamic,
long-term process. It will take time for everyone
to see the benefi ts of the district. BioDistrict New
Orleans needs stakeholder support and buy-in.
Offer more public involvement and education
opportunities beyond public forums.
There needs to be strong community education
regarding the BioDistrict, the biosciences and what
the potential jobs are that will be needed in the
district.
Other General Comments:
The BioDistrict should not be too narrow in focus
and should look beyond healthcare. One fi eld has
the opportunity to spin-off into 10 different fi elds.
Action Items:
Create a Unifi ed Task Force to Create an ongoingComprehensive Workforce Development Strategy
Establish a G.E.D testing center in New Orleans
Community Benefits Agreement Visioning
Sample notes taken during the Workforce Development Visioning
Workshop.
-
8/7/2019 Working Paper V
13/39
13
Workshop Findings
As part of the Community Benefi ts Agreement (CBA)
Workshop, the AECOM Team reviewed the following
aspects of CBAs: what CBAs are, how they are created,
how they are best negotiated, how they are monitored,
their benefi ts and drawbacks, and the types of
community benefi ts that can be included.
The Planning Team then asked the following questions of
the Workshop participants:
What type/size project triggers a CBA?
What types of immediate and long-range benefi ts
do communities want?
What types of incentives can be offered to
developers?
What are the appropriate groups/agencies to
monitor BioDistrict CBAs?
Should benefi ts be limited to BioDistrict
neighborhood residents & businesses?
How do we ensure that CBAs do not deter
development?
What would a CBA between a Government entity
(state) and Community Groups look like?
The following is a summary of the key points, questions
and comments generated during the workshop
discussion.
Benefits to the Community:
CBAs enable the community to be part of the
economic development within the BioDistrict
and spurs investment in the intellectual capital of
those living within the district.
Community needs to advocate for CBAs as
they can provide critical benefi ts to community
residents living and working within the BioDistrict.
Ongoing Education Regarding CBAs:
Education is required both before and after a CBA is
implemented
Clarify the role of the BioDistrict in the creation of
CBAs
Community needs to understand that CBAs are a
contract between Mid-City and/or Gert Town and
potential Developers, not BioDistrict New Orleans.
BioDistrict New Orleans can help advocate for a
community in the right forums.
Implementation of a CBA should not be a tax burden
to residents in the BioDistrict
BioDistrict New Orleans stated that it has a draft
budget for helping to work on a CBA
Need to defi ne the criterion where CBAs could be
used including size and/or type of project
Need to identify who is organizing the community to
enter into a CBA.
BioDistrict New Orleans does not need to be
involved in all CBAs in the BioDistrict.
In order to begin the CBA process, the community
should:
1. Realize that it can be diffi cult for developers to
start the conversation with the community;
2. Have a draft document in hand before meeting
with a developer; and,
3. Be realistic in the asks of the developer.
Potential Opportunities for CBAs:
For the VA Hospital project, its likely too late for
a CBA to be negotiated. However, there may be
an opportunity with UMC and the Charity Hospital
rehabilitation, but this requires getting the right
-
8/7/2019 Working Paper V
14/39
14 December 2010Working Paper 5 Workshop Findings
players at the table now.
Communication with the Community:
Need ongoing clear communication with the
community, so that the process to begin drafting a
CBA starts on the right foot
There is currently little trust within the community
regarding current and future development.
The community is also not convinced of the
employer numbers and quality of jobs provided
by the future VA and UMC hospitals and other
biotech related developments.
Action Items:
Create a CBA Task Force.
Facilitate Development of CBAs for the BioDistrict.
Help identify appropriate people in community for
developers to speak with.
Develop a slide show to educate the community
about CBAs and where they have beensuccessfully used (e.g. Best Practices).
Community Visioning Workshop 1 and 2Findings
Prior to the onset of the visioning process, the AECOM
Team established that success of the BioDistrict is
dependent upon success in these four core areas:
Economic Development
Jobs and Training
Community Building
Civic Leadership
Under the guise of these four themes, feedback from the
community was solicited on the following topics:
Jobs
Education
Housing & Neighborhoods
Community Serving Facilities
Character & Identity
Parks & Recreation Traffi c, Parking, Walking and Transit
Community Engagement
By collecting and sharing diverse input from key
stakeholders during the workshops, the AECOM Team
was able to (1) align common themes into guiding
principles and (2) identify BioDistrict specifi c infrastructure
actions and outcomes. These are found below.
Jobs:
Prioritize hiring for those living in and adjacent to the
BioDistrict
Use local labor and contractors for rebuilding efforts
Need jobs in a variety of areas (medical,digital
media, construction, other community serving
industries)
Stakeholder discussion during the Community Benefi ts Agreements
Visioning Workshop.
-
8/7/2019 Working Paper V
15/39
15
Need to have training that matches the types of
jobs that will be here
Need high paying jobs in order to meet basic living
costs (rent is very expensive)
Education:
Rebuild schools closed due to storm
Create an education pipeline career pathway
for children and adults
Establish after school programs focused on math& science
Create opportunities for lifelong learning
(continuing adult education programs)
Establish summer school programs, internships
and other enrichment programs for children
Educational Institutions should respond to
employers needs (i.e. provide training for available
jobs)
Housing & Neighborhoods: Housing is too expensive Affordable housing is
needed
Encourage mixed-use buildings along Tulane
Avenue & Earhart Boulevard and neighborhood
commercial/small businesses along Canal Street
Residential areas of Mid-City and Gert Town
should not be impacted without input from
residents. Should the BioDistrict include these
residential areas? Some residents would like to
see the district boundaries redrawn to removethese areas from the BioDistrict.
Help protect residents from being priced-out of
their neighborhoods
Blight and drainage are serious issues
Incorporate green building and design techniques
into the planning and development process (e.g.
green roofs, permeable pavers, stormwater
management techniques)
Reuse existing buildings where feasible. What are
the options for the reuse of the Charity Hospital
complex? Can it be reused as a private hospital
and if not, what are the other potential uses that
could be incorporated into the building, so that the
building can be saved and the downtown core can
be strengthened?
Focus new development in downtown area
Preserve historic character of the neighborhoods
Community Serving Facilities:
The following facilities are desired in the BioDistrict:
Grocery (improved access to healthy foods)
Library (larger and with better resources than what
currently exists)
Community Center (a safe place for kids to hang out)
More retail opportunities
Church to serve the Gert Town area
Movie theater (The Theatre at Canal Place is one
venue, but other national chain movie theatres dont
exist directly in the BioDistrict)
Character & Identity:
Nodes of activity (retail, entertainment, etc)
should be located every 6-8 blocks.
Develop fl exible design guidelines that refl ect the
character of New Orleans (We dont want to be
Miami or St. Louis)
The BioDistrict should be safe, walkable, bikable
with a vibrant streetscape
Street and Pedestrian lighting needs to be improved
-
8/7/2019 Working Paper V
16/39
16 December 2010Working Paper 5 Workshop Findings
Find opportunities to refl ect the cultural history of
the BioDistrict
Encourage taller buildings in specifi c areas to
encourage more green space.
Pursue LEED Neighborhood Development (ND)
certifi cation or incorporate strong sustainability
practices for new and renovation projects within
the BioDistrict.
Parks & Recreation:
Increase access to parks and open space
Desired park features:
o Water features
o More playgrounds
o Basketball courts
o Pool to replace closed Gert Town Pool
o Paid staff to oversee recreation areas
o Variety of activities for kids
Traffic, Parking, Walking, Transit:
Improved bus service is needed especially in the
Gert Town area
Limit the amount of surface parking that is
developed in the future
Encourage development of a streetcar on Tulane
Ave
Streets and sidewalks need to be repaired
I-10 needs to be redesigned to unite
neighborhoods
Community Engagement:
Ensure an inclusive and transparent planning
process with the community
Use various techniques to communicate updates
and meeting notices to the community (internet,
mail, door hangers, yard signs, etc.)
Provide different ways for the community to give
feedback to BioDistrict New Orleans
Encourage participation from small businesses as
well as residents
Encourage the use of Community Benefi t
Agreements (CBAs) to help ensure that new
developments in the BioDistrict give back to the
community
Engage with the City on their Place-Based Planning
efforts.
Action Items:
Several action items emerged from the visioning session
with the community. These are to:
Establish Ongoing Dialogue with Community and
Stakeholder Groups
Commitment to Provide Better Notifi cation of Future
Public Meetings
Present fi ndings from Visioning Workshops at Future
Public Meetings
BioDistrict New Orleans and the AECOM Planning Team
are committed to meeting each of these action items.
Stakeholder discussion during the Community Visioning Workshop.
-
8/7/2019 Working Paper V
17/39
17
Section 03:
BioDistrict Vision
Statement
-
8/7/2019 Working Paper V
18/39
December 2010Working Paper 5 Vision Statement18
In 2030,
BioDistrict New Orleans is a thriving cultural, business,
science and health destination, regarded throughout
the city as a district of choice: a walkable community
with excellent schools and services, vibrant
commercial areas, rich historic neighborhoods, andaccessible open space and transit.
A mix of existing, new and affordable single-family
and higher-density housing retains and attracts a
diverse community, including many institutional
faculty and staff who choose to live and work in theBioDistrict.
The presence of excellent colleges, universities and
hospitals is leveraged into resources for improving
the area: technical assistance for job training and
small businesses; institutional research translated into
successful businesses; improved K-12 schools; andsupporting families living in the BioDistrict.
-
8/7/2019 Working Paper V
19/39
19
BioDistrict Vision StatementBased on the hundreds of comments made during the visioning workshops around each of the eight topic areas, as
well as general comments about the project, the AECOM Team has identifi ed the following goals for BioDistrict New
Orleans:
Training for and Creation of JOBS
First-Rate Schools
Protect, Strengthen Neighborhood Character and Quality
Vibrant, Community Serving Business and Retail
New and Renovated Sustainable Developments
Safe, Attractive, Walkable Neighborhoods
Abundant, Accessible Parks and Recreation
Excellent Roadways, Utilities and Infrastructure
Safe, Abundant, Accessible Transportation
Using these eight goals as a starting point, the AECOM Team developed a vision statement for the BioDistrict which
tries to capture the essence of all the ideas, questions and comments that arose during our discussions with the
community. The goal of this vision statement is to present a vivid idealized description of a desired future for the
BioDistrict that inspires, energizes and helps the community support the creation of the future district. The draft
vision statement is found on the previous page and will be presented to the community for feedback during the week
of physical planning workshops scheduled for the week of November 1, 2010.
-
8/7/2019 Working Paper V
20/39
20 December 2010Working Paper 5 Appendices20
Appendix A:
Stakeholder Sign-In
Sheets
-
8/7/2019 Working Paper V
21/39
21
City Visioning
September 7, 2010
-
8/7/2019 Working Paper V
22/39
22 December 2010Working Paper 5 Appendices22
City Visioning
September 7, 2010
-
8/7/2019 Working Paper V
23/39
23
City Visioning
September 7, 2010
-
8/7/2019 Working Paper V
24/39
24 December 2010Working Paper 5 Appendices24
City Visioning
September 7, 2010
-
8/7/2019 Working Paper V
25/39
25
Charity Hospital Visioning
September 8, 2010
-
8/7/2019 Working Paper V
26/39
26 December 2010Working Paper 5 Appendices26
Public Visioning Session I
September 14, 2010
-
8/7/2019 Working Paper V
27/39
27
Public Visioning Session I
September 14, 2010
-
8/7/2019 Working Paper V
28/39
28 December 2010Working Paper 5 Appendices28
Public Visioning Session ISeptember 14, 2010
-
8/7/2019 Working Paper V
29/39
29
Public Visioning Session ISeptember 14, 2010
-
8/7/2019 Working Paper V
30/39
30 December 2010Working Paper 5 Appendices30
Work Force Visioning
September 14, 2010
-
8/7/2019 Working Paper V
31/39
31
Work Force VisioningSeptember 14, 2010
-
8/7/2019 Working Paper V
32/39
32 December 2010Working Paper 5 Appendices32
CBA Visioning
September 15, 2010
-
8/7/2019 Working Paper V
33/39
33
CBA VisioningSeptember 15, 2010
-
8/7/2019 Working Paper V
34/39
34 December 2010Working Paper 5 Appendices34
Public Visioning Session 2
September 16, 2010
-
8/7/2019 Working Paper V
35/39
35
Public Visioning Session 2
September 16, 2010
-
8/7/2019 Working Paper V
36/39
36 December 2010Working Paper 5 Appendices36
Public Visioning Session 2
September 16, 2010
-
8/7/2019 Working Paper V
37/39
37
Public Visioning Session 2
September 16, 2010
-
8/7/2019 Working Paper V
38/39
38 December 2010Working Paper 5 Appendices38
Public Visioning Session 2September 16, 2010
-
8/7/2019 Working Paper V
39/39
39
Public Visioning Session 2September 16, 2010