working with arrows

8/13/2019 Working With Arrows

1/21

Working with Arr

Su

Buddhism is the first religion

religions, your philosophies,

anything else. And if you can

understand your inner proces

insight is tremendously mean

(Osho, The iscipline of Tran

In the beginning of "Beelzebub'

ishes to be a #ons#ious thin$e

"%entation by thought" and "%

riting has to be gras)ed by bo

*inguists today are aare of thi

)atterns of )er#e)tion shared b

*inguists #all the% "se%anti# s

se%anti# stru#ture is not only s

our orld )er#e)tion here "fo

ty)e of a#tion ,verb-:

I ..,Tou#h-../ ou

ou ..,1at#h-../ e

ouns su#h as "I" and "ou" ar

"ou"& 4erbs su#h as "tou#h" a

#orres)onding a#tions& Thus e

tas$ even though it #an be assi

1hen e %a$e a state%ent ab

5b!e#tive reality .,6-./ 7er#eiv

1hen so%eone else tries to un

infers the geo%etri#al stru#ture

ows: a Linguistic Guide to Active

bstantially revised on: 2003.60.26

which brought this message to the wor

re more grounded in your linguistic pa

understand your language better, you

es better. He [Buddha] was the first li

ingful.

cendence, !ol. ", #"$%

1 Introduction

s Tales to His Grandson " Gurd!ieff says t

r has to $no that a %an is #a)able of to

entation by for%&" urther he says that th

th ty)es of %entation&

s se#ond ty)e of %entation and asso#iates

y all hu%an beings and also by ani%als to

ru#tures" even though this na%ing is narr

e%anti# but also indi#ative of the geo%etri

r%s" ,nouns- #an e(ist only in their relatio

labels that #an be re)la#ed by the %ental

d "at#h" )oint to our sensation.based %

#an say that "%entation by for%" is essen

ted by the use of ords as labels and )oi

ut a definite )er#e)tion the folloing )ro

ed reality .,2-./ 4erbally.for%ulated realit

erstand the state%ent the )ro#ess is rev

of the s)ea$er's )er#e)tion by analyzing t

Mentation

ld& that your

terns than in

ill be able to

guist, and his

at anyone ho

ty)es of %entation:

e(a#t %eaning of all

it ith general

a #ertain e(tent&

and %isleading& +

#al #onfiguration of

nshi) ith a #ertain

)i#tures of "I" and

%ory of

tially a nonverbal

ters&

ess ta$es )la#e:

y

rsed: the listener

he state%ent&


2/21

1ith this a#$noledg%ent of "

no %ore a boring study of gra%

the las that govern the stru#t

a))li#able to the #onversion of

These studies also reveal the #

8uality of the to reality.#onve

#onventional ay of using an a

serious error that linguists toda

I ../ the observed )heno%eno

Sin#e 5us)ens$y #hose this a

attention" as the #hara#teristi#

se#ond half of this essay after s

)er#e)tions ado)ted by linguist

+bout 69 years ago I as )rof

)aid e(er#ise of #onverting sen

,%entation by for%- and vi#e v

rite listen and s)ea$ hel)ed

sha)ed %y uni8ue ay of using

a grou) for%at& This essay )ro

si%ilar e(er#ise&

2 Lingu

Accordin to this information

e'ery man bold enough to as

himself a conscious thin)er

respon ible e*istence, that

thought, e*pressed by wordsroper to all animals as well

(urd-ieff, Beelebubs Tales

The linguisti# study of "%entati

started about 20 years after Gu

foundation of these studies: o

relationshi) beteen language

The #ase gra%%ar theory enabl

#orres)onding )er#e)tion by an

"entation by for%" is the )ro#

by for%" #an be assisted effe#ti

holders of attention& everthel

entation by for%" a ne bran#h of lingui

%ati#al rules& In this ne bran#h of lingui

re of our )er#e)tion along ith the gra%

hat stru#ture into a senten#e stru#ture ,+

%%on li%itations and errors of our %ind t

sion )ro#esses ,+rros 6 and 2 above-& In

ro as shon belo for des#ribing a )er#e

y are aare of:

of using an arro hen he des#ribed the

feature of self.re%e%bering I ill dis#uss

hoing you a different ay of using arro

s today&

ssionally involved in a#tivities in this field

en#es ,%entation by thought- into stru#tu

rsa& This e(er#ise substantially #hanged t

in %y #areer as a translator and riter an

language in #ondu#ting a !oint e()loration

ides you ith %ini%u% infor%ation re8uir

stics and "Mentation by For

, it was customary in long0 ast centuri

ire to the right to be considered by ot

to be instructed, while still in the earl

an has two )inds of mentation one )ind

always possessing a relati'e meaning, aas to man, which + would call mentatio

to His randson , p. "/%

n by for%" and its relationshi) ith "%en

rd!ieffs death& To linguists are $non to

a% ;ho%s$y and ;harles ill%ore& ;ho%s

nd %ind hile ill%ore established the "#

led linguists to deter%ine the geo%etri#al

alyzing a senten#e in ter%s of verb.noun r

ess of )er#e)tion that )re#edes verbal for

vely or ineffe#tively by the use of ords as

ss "%entation by for%" #an be #ondu#ted

ti#s as born that is

ti#s linguists study

ati#al rules

ro 2 above-&

hat restri#t the

fa#t the

)tion in#ludes a

"division of

about it in the

for des#ribing

daily #ondu#ting the

es of )er#e)tion

e ay I thin$ read

d %ore re#ently

of our true nature in

ed for #ondu#ting a

"

s on 1arth for

ers and to consider

years of his

, mentation by

nd another )ind,n by form.

ation by thought"

ave built the

y studied the

se gra%%ar" theory&

tru#ture of

elationshi)s&

ulation& "entation

labels )ointers and

ithout relying on or


3/21

being #onstrained by gra%%ati

on our s)atial aareness %ov

than on our linguisti# )rofi#ien#

"entation by thought" on the

language hi#h has %u#h less

)er#e)tion of reality& The 8ualit

"%entation by for%&" 1ithout t

In the last fe de#ades studies

*anguage 7ro#essing ,*7- and

languages are too sub!e#tive an

#o%)uter and therefore loo$ed

universal for%at& ro% 6a)a

In the field of %a#hine translati

su##essful only beteen langua

translate >a)anese into ?nglish

had been )redi#ted by Gurd!ief

The second )ind of mentatio

the e*act meaning of all writ"/%

The %a#hine translation syste%

senten#e into a se%anti# stru#t

then generates an ?nglish sent

of )er#e)tion and then rea))ea

This %ethod of translation tho

re)resenting the geo%etri#al st

effe#tive& Thus the toughest )r#onveyed by ords in different

beteen different languages&

ren#h has rea#hed a level of r

translation beteen ?nglish an

handi#a) is not the differen#e o

#on#e)ts atta#hed to ords in t

ha))en beteen to languages

The second )ind of mentatio

the e*act meaning of all writ

conscious confrontation with

by the conditions of geograp

al rules& It is essentially a nonverbal tas$

%ent aareness relationshi) aareness

y&

other hand #orres)onds to %ental )ro#es

#a)ability for re)resenting our )otentially

y of "%entation by thought" de)ends on it

is #onne#tion thin$ing degenerates into "

in this field ere a#tively #ondu#ted by de

%a#hine translation %ethodologies& They

d idiosyn#rati# to be handled effe#tively as

for a ay to #onvert our natural language

6


4/21

en'ironment in which they h

adulthood.

Thus, in the brains of people

localities under different con

idea 2uite different indepen

their being a definite sensati

e*pressed by some word or o

That is why each word for th

different geographical locali

say inner content.

(ibid, pp. "/0"3%

1hen there is no )ressing need

"%entation by for%" de)ends l

)re#ede "%entation by for%&" I

ords" is not entirely absurd& S

ne#essarily %ean a verbal a#tiv

asso#iated ith Gurd!ieff li$e t

#onne#t the ord "thin$ing" it

evertheless if e as)ire to be

"%entation by for%" hile e ariting& ore s)e#ifi#ally it is a

universe e are )aying attentio

)la#e of sub!e#tivity&

3 Movements and

any %ysti#s fro% Hera#leitus

#onfir%s this vie ith his e%)

universe as e()ounded in the B

4ou see a ri'er. oes a ri'er

mo'ement out, will there be

disappear. +t is not that the

6ife means li'ing. 6ife is not

you will be able to see& e'er

(Osho, The iscipline of Tran

5ur ordinary %ind hoever la

*inguisti#ally this li%itation is

of the hole senten#e or of its

'e arisen and in which their e*istence

of different races li'ing in different ge

ditions, there arise in regard to one an

ent forms, which during the flow of as

n gi'ing rise to a definite picturing, a

her that ser'es only for it outer sub-e

same thing or idea almost always ac2

ies and races a 2uite specific and entir

for #o%%uni#ation as e fa#e reality ith

ss on language& 4erbal for%ulations #an f

this sense @en %asters' insisten#e on "t

i%ilarly hen Gurd!ieff uses the ord "thi

ity& 7arti#ularly in the #onte(t of so%e inn

e one #ou)led ith his last ove%ent it i

h an a#tivity that involves verbal for%ulati

a "#ons#ious thin$er" e %ust %aintain

re involved ith ords hile thin$ing reade%and to %aintain the s)atial aarenes

n to along ith the aareness of our #urr

Objects: Basic Constituents!eaity

to 5sho sa %ove%ent as the essen#e of

hasize on the ove%ents and his dyna%i#

eelzebubs Tales& The folloing ords #o%

eally e*ist, or is it -ust a mo'ement5 +f

a ri'er5 Once the mo'ement is ta)en o

i'er is mo'ing8 the ri'er is nothing but

a noun, it is a 'erb. And e'erything is a

thing is becoming, nothing is static.

cendence, !ol. ", #"$%

#$s #a)a#ity to fo#us on %ore than one %

anifested by the fa#t that only a single ve

a#h inde)endent logi#al unit& This verb is

as flowed up to

graphical

the same thing or

ociations e'o)e in

d this picturing is

ti'e e*pression.

ires for people of

ly different so to

#lear aareness

llo but ill not

in$ing ithout

$ing" it %ay not

r e(er#ises

s hardly )ossible to

n&

strea% of

ing s)ea$ing andof the #on#e)tual

nt fo#us and the

of erceived

eality& Gurd!ieff also

vision of the

fro% 5sho:

you ta)e the

t the ri'er will

ri'ering . . .

'erb. 7atch and

ve%ents at one ti%e&

rb fun#tions as a hub

alled the %ain verb&


5/21

If the senten#e has to or %or

the to) or the verbs are !u(ta)

for%ing a unit or the senten#e

a se)arate )er#e)tion& 5ur lang

relationshi)s a%ong different v

single verb and %ulti)le nouns

I love you&

I A.. *ove ../ ou

In all ty)es of state%ents in#lu

holds different ty)es of relation

#on#e)ts that are tentatively as

usually asso#iated ith a stati#

)er#e)tion a si%)le analysis of

,verbs- are at the #ore of our

of the stru#ture of )er#e)tion

In s)ite of this e usually give

is understandable be#ause %ov

%ental i%ages& Sin#e you %ust

to sho a differen#e beteen v

S.C5S #o%%and synta(: ;5

1indos: Sele#t D sele#t ;57

Eeaders ho have e()erien#ed

the ob!e#t.oriented interfa#e ,li

our e()erien#e of using #o%)ut

ay of )er#e)tion and therefor

degenerate our ability to fo#us

4erb.#entered )er#e)tion allo

very different fro% noun.#enter%ore attention to verbs than to

have felt asha%ed instead of b

by)rodu#t of his thin$ing a fals

)er#e)tion& In other ords h

# Case $ramm

The #ase gra%%ar theory is i

of )er#e)tion& The #ase gra%%

our language fall into one of th

,2- ouns and their subordinat

to saying that our vision of reali

verbs they usually for% a hierar#hy he

osed in a si%)listi# ay in hi#h they #an

is divided into inde)endent logi#al units in

uage is li%ited in its ability to )resent the

rbs& + state%ent of a si%)le )er#e)tion u

that are #onne#ted to the verb:

ing this one the %ain verb in the senten#

shi)s ith nouns ithin the senten#e& ou

su%ed to be stati#& In the %ind of the )er

i%age or "for%&" ?ven ith the given li%it

gra%%ati#al stru#tures is enough to reve

orld )er#e)tion& In the above e(a%)le "lo

hi#h loo$s %ore i%)ortant than "I" and "y

less attention to %ove%entsverbs than t

e%ents are less gras)able than ob!e#ts th

be fa%iliar ith using #o%)uters I ta$e t

rb.#entered )er#e)tion and noun.#entere

D

and then sele#t &

the shift fro% the )ro#ess.oriented interfa

$e 1indos- ill be able to re#all the big d

ers& 1hile the ob!e#t.oriented interfa#e is

%ore user.friendly its ide.s)read use

n %ove%ents&

better a))re#iation of reality& 4erb.#ente

ed )er#e)tion& 1hat ould have ha))enednouns hen he #lai%ed: "I thin$ therefor

ing )roud in finding out that his fa%ous "I

e entity that a))eared )er%anent only be

re are you hen you are not thin$ingF

r and t%e &tructure of Our

ely used for relating linguisti# )atterns i

r theory stands on the re#ognition that %

folloing three #ategories: ,6- 4erbs and

s and ,3- 1ords that define their relation

ity #onsists of: ,6- ove%ents ,2- 5b!e#t

e the %ain verb is at

been seen as

ividually )resenting

%anners of dyna%i#

ually #onsists of a

e is li$e a hub that

s are the ob!e#ts or

eiver they are

ation of our

l that %ove%ents

ve" is at the #enter

ou& "

ob!e#tsnouns& This

t #an be held as

e folloing e(a%)le

)er#e)tion:

e ,li$e S.C5S- to

ifferen#e it #aused in

loser to our habitual

ay further

ed )er#e)tion #an be

if Ces#artes gavee I e(ist"F He %ust

" as nothing but a

ause of his li%ited

erce'tion

h universal )atterns

!or #o%)onents of

their subordinates

shi)s& This is si%ilar

and ,3- Their


6/21

Eelationshi)s&

Se%anti# stru#ture analysis usi

of verbs and %ove%ents in the

se%anti# stru#ture analysis are

ord given in a line above& a

relationshi) beteen a verb an

of relationshi)s are #alled "#ase

I love you&

I A.,e()erien#er-. *ove .,targe

I ill buy you beautiful floers

I A.,agent-... Buy .,re#i)ient-.

.,target-./ l

.,ti%e-./ To

.,lo#ation-./

I a% glad to $no that you lov

I A.,e()erien#er-. no .,#ont

A.,state-. Glad

These e(a%)les sho us the st

nouns are li$e )lanets& 4erbs d

relationshi)s ,se%anti# #ases-

e(a%)le re8uires the "e()erie

e()e#t to have ith a verb are

oreover so%e nouns #hange

"I" a% "I" only hen it relates

relates ith a verb as a "target

ho I a% de)ends on %y relati

To illustrate the governing role

a verb is de)i#ted as a #enter f

arro ends u) hi#h sy%boli#

ends&

The above e(a%)les are )roba

gra)hi#al stru#ture of "nodes" ,

stru#tures are #lose re)resenta

hu%an beings ho share si%ila

li%ited nu%bers of se%anti# #a#o%)onents& Gra%%ati#al rule

#onverting universal stru#tures

*oo$ing at the geo%etri#al #onf

g the #ase gra%%ar theory reveals the )

stru#ture of our language and )er#e)tion&

given belo& +n asteris$ ,- indi#ates a #

es atta#hed to the arros sho a )arti#ul

a noun ,or so%eti%es beteen nouns-& T

s" ,or "se%anti# #ases"- in linguisti#s&

t-./ou

to%orro at the floer sho)&

/ ou

oers A.,attribute-. Beautiful

%orro

loer sho)

%e&

ent-./ ouA.,e()erien#er-. *ove .,target

u#ture of our linguisti# universe here ver

ter%ine the stru#ture be#ause ea#h verb

hat it #an assign to nouns& 5ur ordinary )

#er" and "target&" The ty)es of relationshi

eter%ined by the verb&

their #hara#ters by the ay they relate it

ith a verb as an "agent" or "e()erien#er&

" "goal" "instru%ent" and so on& This see

nshi) ith %ove%ents&

of verbs in a geo%etri#al re)resentation of

o% hi#h arros #o%e out& + noun is a )l

lly #an be ta$en as a )la#e here our aa

ly enough to sho that any senten#e #an

stru#tural #o%)onents- and "ar#s" ,arros

ions of our orld )er#e)tion they are gen

r %odalities and li%itations of )er#e)tion&

ses that define a relationshi) beteen diffs)e#ifi# to ea#h language are nothing but

of )er#e)tion into verbally.#o%%uni#able

iguration of se%anti# stru#tures it is #lear

ra%ount i%)ortan#e

+ fe e(a%)les of

nne#tion to the sa%e

r ty)e of

hese different ty)es

-./ eJ

bs are li$e suns and

as its on set of

r#e)tion of love for

s that nouns #an

a verb& In ?nglish

"I" a% "e" hen it

%s to indi#ate that

se%anti# stru#ture

#e here ea#h

reness of %ove%ents

e redu#ed to a

-& Sin#e se%anti#

rally #o%%on to all

here are only

rent linguisti#the rules for

or%s&

to everyone that


7/21

verbs and %ove%ents deserve

)er#eived reality& 1hen e thin

be#ause of the linear #onfigurat

( )*ercises in

or those ho are interested in

based on the #ase gra%%ar th

of %a!or se%anti# #ases that #

The folloing are %a!or se%an

They all sho ho for%s ,noun

The list is e(haustive and the d

6 +gent;ause

2 ?()erien#er7er#eiver

3 Target ,dire#t ob!e#t of an a#

K Ee#i)ientBenefi#iary ,of the

9 7artner+##o%)ani%entInst

L ;ontentSubstan#eaterial

M *o#ationCire#tion5rientatio

= Ti%eCurationre8uen#y5r

< ?ffe#tEesultGoal7ur)ose

60 Stateanner+ttitudeNuali

+ verb.to.verb relationshi) #an

"ti%e.after" ,after- and so on&

order& +n arro should originat

oun.to.noun and ad!e#tive.to

"8uantity" "order" "e8uation"

The tense ,)ast )resent futur

by an o)en.ended arro& The "

I bought floers&

I A.,agent-. buy .,target-./ l

.,)ast-./

To indi#ate negation si%)ly ad

,de#larative i%)erative interr

even though this ay of re)res

usually o%itted&

Co you love %eF

%ore attention if e ish to have a hole

$ read rite listen and s)ea$ hoever

ion of verbal for%ulations&

onscious +%in,ing and "MeForm"

a#tually trying out the %ethod of se%anti

ory as an e(er#ise in "entation by or%"

n be used for na%ing arros&

i# #ases that define a relationshi) beteen

s- #an )arti#i)ate in an a#tion or %ove%e

finition of so%e ter%s overla) ea#h other&

ion re)resented by verb-

esult of an a#tion-

u%entethod

er

tyNuantity?(tentCegree

be variously na%ed as "#ondition" ,if- "sy

4erbs in a senten#e ,or its ea#h logi#al uni

e fro% a verb higher in the hierar#hy&

noun relationshi)s #an ta$e the for% of "a

O- "logi#al in#lusion" "onershi)" and s

et#&- indi#ated by the %odifi#ation of a v

resent" tense arro is usually o%itted&

ers

a si%ilar "negation" arro to the verb& T

gative et#&- #an also be indi#ated by addi

ntation %ay not be 8uite #orre#t& The "de

o%e )i#ture of the

e fail to realize this

tation by

stru#ture analysis

I )rovide here a list

a verb and a noun&

t indi#ated by a verb&

:

n#hroni#ity" ,hen-

t- are in hierar#hi#al

ttribute" "8uality"

on&

erb #an be indi#ated

e style of s)ee#h

g a si%ilar arro

larative" arro is


8/21


9/21

stru#tures do not in#lude the re

senten#e li$e this:

I a%&

I A.,result-. Be %y inter)retat

I A.,e()erien#er-. Be a #o%%

I A.,agent-. Be a 8uestionable

inally at the end of this se#tio

ith the folloing des#ri)tion b

+t is important to )now how

the thin)ing center. 7e shall

e*ercises we ha'e done so fahimself 2uestions relating to

and material&

" +ts origin

9 The cause of its origin

: +ts history

; +ts 2ualities and attributes

/ Ob-ects connected with it a

3 +ts use and applications

< +ts results and effects

= 7hat it e*plains and pro'e

> +ts end or its future

"$ 4our opinion, the cause a

(urd-ieff, !iews from the ?

It see%s signifi#ant that Gurd!i

of hat is no $non as the G

This e(er#ise in #ons#ious thin$,+rro 2 in earlier.)resented %

ith the first reality.#onversion

- Critica )

The state of self.re%e%bering i

both& Here linguists are )robab

e #onsider as "sub!e#t" and "o

and outer orld&

o let us ree(a%ine the #o%

al a#tion of a verb& The verb "be" #o%es al

ionJ

n inter)retationJ

inter)retationJ

n you %ay ish to #o%)are the given list

Gurd!ieff of an e(er#ise for #ons#ious thi

ot to depend on associations, and ther

e*ercise the mo'ing center by continui

. . . 6et e'eryone ta)e some ob-ect. 6ethe ob-ect and answer these according

nd related to it

d moti'es of this opinion

al 7orld, p."$3%

ff #ou)les this e(er#ise of #ons#ious thin$i

rd!ieff ove%ents hi#h #an be seen as

ing is an e(er#ise of the se#ond reality.#onodel- hile the )ra#ti#e of the ove%ents

)ro#ess ,+rro 6-&

amination of Ous'ens,y.s /

s so%eti%es des#ribed as being aare of "

ly %ore aare than others about the arbit

b!e#t&" +lso arbitrary is the division bete

on understanding of self.re%e%bering by

ive only in a

of se%anti# #ases

$ing:

fore begin with

g the same

t each of you as)to his )nowledge

ng ith the )ra#ti#e

language of for%s&

version )ro#esshas so%ething to do

rro0s

sub!e#t" and "ob!e#t"

ary nature of hat

n our inner orld

a))lying the


10/21

%ethodology that I have introd

5us)ens$y's ell.$non des#ri

+ am spea)ing of the di'ision

remembering. + represented

omething, my attention is d

+ 00@ the obser'ed phenomen

7hen at the same time, + try

towards the ob-ect obser'ed

line&

+ 00@ the obser'ed phenome

Ha'ing de ined this + saw tha

without wea)ening or obliter

this something else could a

(Ouspens)y, +n Cearch of the

Before reading further I ould

5us)ens$y and ho it %a$es s

based re)resentations 5us)ens

understood so far:

+ 00@ the obser'ed phenomen

+ 00@ the obser'ed phenome

*et us begin by 8uestioning the

arro )ointing to ob!e#ts:

,6- It is true in ter%s of our fel%a$e an effort to )ay attention

,2- S#ientifi#ally and in effortle

us&

,3- The first arro of 5us)ens$

"I ./ou" ty)e of )er#eiving on

sit#h beteen these to %od

"I" a% "I" if the arro goes out

reason it is rather %isleading t

the double.headed arro in there%e%bering& Is this an uninte

this sa%e old "I" had to be re%

see%s to give us an #lue:

#ed in )re#eding se#tions& 1e shall start

tion about self.re%e%bering:

of attention which is the characteristic

t to myself in the following way& 7hen

rected towards what + obser'e 0 a line

n.

to remember myself, my attention is d

and towards myself. A second arrowhea

on.

the problem consisted in directing att

ating the attention directed on someth

well be within me as outside me.

iraculous, Dhapter


11/21

oreo'er this Esomething els

This state%ent of 5us)ens$y s

li%itation #onsisting in his stub

attention within him and outsid

on double.headed arro %od

observe therefore I e(ist" as l

5bserving I&

It is not %y intention to #o%)le

su)eriority over the "I" assu%e

observer to different I's that a)

is fir%ly established at the #ent

#enter as a #enter of our "%entand not the )rodu#er of our ass

5us)ens$y's for%ulation see%s

#enter as it is no in its state

identifi#ation ith out %ental fa

ost )robably hat 5us)ens$

an effort of self.observation tha

+ 00@ something in oneEs so0cal

The )ra#ti#e of self.observation

rather than benefi#ial:

7e feel that there may be s

Are we wrong, r. urd-ieff

Fe'er you do self0obser'atio

obser'ation you do. Dan e'en

(1dwin 7olfe, 1pisodes with

+s I see the )ra#ti#e of self.ob

be#ause it #an bring one to the

of this 5bserving I as it is no

see various #ontradi#tions and

#ontrol available to it in its sta

)ro#eeding in one's general )re

the idea of "not e()ressing neg

So%e )eo)le es)e#ially intelle

5bserving I in its )resent state%isguided effort in #ontrolling

toard %ore rigidity and )olishi

eat the dile%%a beteen the 5

re#on#ile the%&

eE could as well be within me as outside

e%s to reveal both his li%itation and #ont

orn #linging to his sa%e old 5bserving I

himbut never to this sa%e old "I" thereb

l& 5us)ens$y is as %ista$en as Ces#artes

ng as the sour#e of this observation re%a

tely deny the %erit of this 5bserving I at

d by Ces#artes be#ause this 5bserving I

)ear in #on!un#tion ith different thoughts

er in our head of i%)artial )er#e)tion or o

ation by for%" and the governor of our "%o#iations it is indeed so%ething orthy of

to #arry the danger of e%)hasizing the fu

f isolation fro% other #enters and %oreo

#ulty as it is no&

as atte%)ting in the na%e of self.re%e

t should be re)resented by a single.heade

led inner world and outer world

if it is #entered around our %ind as it is

mething wrong in the way we are doin

n, he said forcefully. 4ou do mind ob

ma)e psychopath.

urd-ieff, p. ""%

ervation is good and ne#essary in the beg

)oint of utter des)air and sin#ere a##e)ta

in #reating a real har%ony in oneself in s

e#hani#al rea#tions in oneself and in othe

e of isolation fro% other #enters is to blo

sen#e a re)ressive %ode of #ontrol often

ative e%otions&"

tual %ales do not li$e to a##e)t the i%)ot

of isolation& 1ith a la#$ of this a##e)tan#eneself the so.#alled ourth 1ay #an easil

ng of a "1or$" )ersonality . the out#o%e

bserving I's #a)a#ity to see #onfli#ts and it

me

adi#tion: his

hile turning his

y #ontradi#ting his

in assu%ing "I

ins the sa%e old

least it has a

uld be able to be an

& If this 5bserving I

ur real thin$ing

ntation by thoughts")raise& Still the

n#tioning of our head

er )rodu#e an

bering as a#tually

d arro:

an be har%ful

self0obser'ation.

er'ation. ind

inning but only

#e of the i%)oten#e

ite of its #a)a#ity to

rs& The only %ode of

$ the a#tivities

rongly #onne#ted to

en#e of the

and ith abe#o%e a ay

f being unable to

s inability to


12/21

To follo the double.headed ar

attention honestly to the state

)aying attention here does t

%ind that has its #enter of a#ti

#onditioned %ostly by our biolo

dangers and loo$ for food shel

re%e%bering it is also )oere

%ind #an be )oered by so%et

re%e%bering %erely as a ay

tra#ing ba#$ the flo of our ord

biologi#ally.deter%ined ego&

This )ro#ess of tra#ing our %en

aareness of our ordinary %ind

%ind a##e)ts it it is no %ore t

its habitual ay of fun#tioning&

not the )ur)ose of self.re%e%b

ter%s of our %ental attention o

sing

o let us see ho e #an use

re)resentation of our self.)er#e

)er#e)tion )e#uliar to self.re%

re)resentation of our ordinary

gra%%ar theory:

I A.,)er#eiver-. 5bserve .,targ

The )la#e%ent of the verb "5bs

ordinary sense of "I" is alays

verb& That a#tion #an be the a#

Here it is i%)ortant to noti#e t

a sense of "I" in ourselves:

I A.,agente()erien#er)er#eiv

To e()erien#e it %ore realisti#a

aloud rhyth%i#ally any verb foll

a))ro)riate s)eed& ?ven thoug

sense of sub!e#tivity in relation

e()erien#e the taste of "I" and

love.I hate.I sense.I tou#h.I

ou %ay taste a #o%%on threa

that arise in #on!un#tion ith di

o %odel beyond the )oint 5us)ens$y da

f this 5bserving I as it is no& 1hen e

at attention #o%e fro%F 1e %ay #all this

ity in our head& 1hat )oers this %indF It

gi#al needs to )ay attention to the outer

er and %ating )artners& In our atte%)ts

by our desire to be#o%e "so%ething one

hing higher but it #annot ha))en as long a

or )ersonal develo)%ent& So the nature o

inary %ental attention to its sour#e is %os

tal attention to its sour#e should bring us t

's slavery to our so#ial and biologi#al #ondi

e sa%e old %ind and then it %ay begin to

Strengthening the )oer of our %ind as it

ering& oreover self.re%e%bering should

nly&

erb4centered erce'tion Mo

the %ethod that I des#ribed earlier to )ro

)tion and orld.)er#e)tion and ho)efully

%bering& *et us begin by reriting the 5u

orld.)er#e)tion using the verb.#entered a

et-./ +ny ob!e#t

erve" at the #enter re)resents an underst

he )rodu#t of a #ertain a#tion linguisti#ally

ion of our %ind hi#h in this #ase is the a

at observation is only one of innu%erable

r-. +ny +#tion .../+ny ob!e#tJ

lly you %ay do the folloing e(er#ise: re)

oed by the ord "I" ith an even.te%)o

it is against the ?nglish gra%%ati#al rule

hi) to the verb you )ronoun#ed earlier& In

not "e&" ou #an start li$e: observe.I thi

& & &

d of sub!e#tivity that )ersists through diffe

fferent verbs& This taste of sub!e#tivity

red e %ust )ay

a$e an effort of

our#e our ordinary

is )oered and

orld in order to avoid

f so.#alled self.

is not&" The sa%e

e ta$e self.

"I" that e rea#h by

)robably our

o the horrifying

tionings& 1hen our

desire freedo% fro%

is hoever is surely

not be understood in

es

u#e a better

a better %odel of

)ens$y's

))roa#h of the #ase

nding that our

re)resented by a

#t of observation&

a#tions that )rodu#e

eat )ronoun#ing

%usi# of an

you should have the

other ords

n$.I read.I feel.I

rent senses of "I"

i#h #an be different


13/21

fro% the sense of 5bserving I

In this e(er#ise by the ay yo

gra%%ar theorists: Is the "I" in

"I" in "I re#eive" is assu%ing th

assu%ing the agent #ase ,other

in su#h e()ressions as "I re#eiv

This observation also indi#ates

a delusion&

The 5us)ens$y's re)resentatio

5bserving I at the left side of t

that #an a))ear in #on!un#tion

as I %entioned earlier but as lo

a su)eriority as the )ra#ti#e of

one #hooses %ental observatio

#an be seen as an adhesion to

e()li#itly arned against this ty

. . . the 2uestion of so0called

2uite indispensable at the be

which, if it becomes the cent

ago established and 'erified

reat regret, + obser'e now i

(urd-ieff, 6ife is real only t

The verb "observe" is only one

of )er#e)tion %entioned by Gu

I A.,)er#eiver-. 5bserve .,targ

I A.,)er#eiver-. eel .,target-.

I A.,)er#eiver-. Sense .,target

?ven though e use the sa%e

these three %a!or %odalities of

sensing.I are distin#t fro% ea#h

and sensing.I are e()erien#ed

against our true feeling- are th

%entally.observing.I and sensi

)resen#e& 1e have a #enter of

a#tivated only by drea%s and f

%entally.observing.I should do

to loo$ for situations in hi#h itith the sensing.I hi#h again

7otentially there are several %

a%ong the %entally.observing.

%ay indeed have so%ething to do ith sel

u %ay hit u)on a sub!e#t of #ontroversy a

"I give" si%ilar to the "I" in "I re#eive"F I

e target #ase or re#eiver #ase even though

ise one should say "e re#eive"-& So the

e" should be asso#iated ith the sense of "

hat our sense of sub!e#tivity #an so%eti%

of self.re%e%bering %ay give a rong id

e arro has an un#onditional su)eriority o

ith different a#tions ,verbs-& It should ha

ng as this observation re%ains %erely %e

he ove%ents ill sho& The illusion of s

as a #hief %ethod for relating ith ob!e#t

single se%anti# #ase in relation to a singl

)e of obsession:

self0obser'ation. . . the )nowledge o

inning for e'eryone who is stri'ing to

er of gra'ity for the mentation of man,

y me, unfailingly lead to -ust the resul

almost e'ery one of you.

en, when + am, p. >3%

of the verbs that #hara#terize one of the th

d!ieff:

et-./ So%ething

So%ething

-./ So%ething

ord "I" to des#ribe the sense of sub!e#tivi

our )er#e)tion the %entally.observing.I

other& In reality for %ost of us only the

s having so%e #oheren#e of their on& Si

by)rodu#ts of #onfli#ts and %o%entary )

g.I they only have te%)orary #enters of

igher feelings in us but unfortunately in

ntasies or under the influen#e of se(& So

after a##e)ting its i%)oten#e in its #urren

%ay be able to have a taste of bi.dire#tio#an be re)resented by a double.headed a

odalities of self.aareness )ossible in a tri

I feeling.I and sensing.I& 7la#ing oneself

.re%e%bering&

ong the #ase.

ter%s of reality the

gra%%ati#ally it is

felt sense of the "I"

e" rather than "I"&

s be the )rodu#t of

ea that the

ver other ty)es of "I"

e so%e su)eriority

tal it is not %u#h of

)eriority ill gro if

s hi#h linguisti#ally

e verb& Gurd!ieff

which is indeed

earn the truth, but

will, as was long

t which, to my

ree %a!or %odalities

y that arises out of

feeling.I and

%entally.observing.I

#e our e%otions ,as

a#e beteen the

heir e(isten#e in our

ost of us it is

the first thing the

state of isolation is

al #o%%uni#ationro&

ngular relationshi)

in the )osition of


14/21

one's %ind to observe one's fee

self.aareness& Thoughts #an b

sensations #an )rodu#e feelings

In the )resen#e of %ore than o

one real I and ho its )resen#e

8uestion by trying to identify th

"e&"

1hat is the %e#hanis% that )r

%o%ent of all ty)es of )er#e)ti

)er#e)tion re8uires a distin#tio

beteen bla#$ and hite you #

this senten#e into ords and )

)er#e)tion #an be re)resented

5ne side P +nother side

+t any %o%ent %ulti)le )er#e

of dualities su#h as near.far hi

right.rong heavy.light and s

#alled inner orld and outer o

Inner orld P 5uter orld

It is not really us ho %a$e thi

this division that ha))ens auto

after this division of reality h

e%otionally or %entally #loser

to the inner orld& The dividing

alays tentative& 1ith every ri

)er#e)tion a border suddenly

In ?nglish hen e loo$ at the

use the ord "ou" as a re)res

I ../ ou

The ?nglish gra%%ar de%ands

the )ers)e#tive of the outer o

e A.. ou

The sense of "I" and the sense

ling and sensations is only one a%ong sev

e sensed and felt feelings #an be related t

and so on&

e I's and %yriad for%s of self.aareness

e()erien#edF The folloing se#tion of this

e %e#hanis% that )rodu#es in us the varie

5 I4Me4/m

du#es in us the sense of "I" or the sense

onF *et us begin our e()loration by a##e)ti

hi#h is the a#t of dividing reality& If you

annot read the #hara#ters you are reading&

rases you #annot %a$e sense of it& The b

s follos:

tions are ha))ening to us that are dividin

h.lo bright.dar$ #o%fortable.un#o%for

on& +%ong these divisions are the divisio

rld&

division& Eather hat e #onsider as our

ati#ally ith our inborn fa#ulty of )er#e)ti

tever side of the division that is e()erien#

fa%iliar or benefi#ial to the )er#eiver is #

line beteen the inner orld and outer

)le in our )er#e)tion and ith every shift i

isa))ears and rea))ears so%ehere else&

outer orld fro% the inner orld e use

ntation of the outer orld:

the use of the ord "e" hen e loo$ at

rld:

of "e" are sho#$ingly distin#t fro% ea#h o

eral %odalities of

o sensations

hat is the )la#e of

essay addresses this

d senses of "I" and

f "e" in the

ng the fa#t that ea#h

#annot distinguish

& If you #annot divide

si# for% of our

the reality in ter%s

table good.bad

n beteen our so.

selves is the result of

on& I%%ediately

ed as )hysi#ally

nsidered to belong

rld is fle(ible and

n the %odality of our

the ord "I&" Here I

our inner orld fro%

ther if e #an


15/21

be#o%e aare of it& To have its

e(er#ise of verbalization this ti

sense of sub!e#tivity as one sta

then "any noun Q e" to e()eri

re#eives the gaze or )resen#e

Ee)eating the "I" e(er#ise and

#ognitive and )sy#hologi#al #on

sense of hu%or %ay arise and

o)inion these things that one )

an invisible %ove%ent #loser t

ith self.re%e%bering&

1ith regards breathing Gurd!ie

the o#tave of i%)ressions is th

insists on starting ith a %enta

i%)artial observation of his inn

breathing #hanges then he is )

be#ause the e(ertion of our %e

be#ause our ordinary %ind is a

+s I understand fro% hat I re

+nother #riterion should be the

dualities& aybe you $no the

Henri i#heau a ren#h riter

#ontradi#tions that are nor%all

,"for%atory a))aratus" or our

Eeturning to the sub!e#t of #og

i%)artial aareness and full a#

invisible %ove%ent toard the

)sy#hologi#al %ove%ent to the

to an i%age of oneself that is in

has nothing to do ith reality&

There is one )ie#e of Gurd!ieff

hi#h a))ear to indi#ate a trian

The )la#e%ent of "+%" at the t

)ers)e#tive it offers& 1hen e l

hoever the triangle has to be

e()erien#ed as "dro))ing don

e()erien#ed as going u) into th

taste you %ay ish to do a variation of t

%e using the #o%bination of "any noun Q

nds before the )erson or ob!e#t indi#ated b

en#e the sense of self.aareness or self.#

f the )erson or ob!e#t indi#ated by the nou

e" e(er#ise one after another and fully a

trast beteen the to your breathing %a

so%ething %ay be sensed to settle don i

er#eives %ostly through sensations are th

the essen#e of our being and therefore s

ff e()li#itly says that the #onta#t beteen

basi# re8uire%ent of self.re%e%bering& S

l effort breathing should be used as an in

r orld outer orld and their relationshi

robably %a$ing a right effort& This usually

tal attention often inhibits our breathing&

devi#e designed to negate or #o%)ro%ise

d Gurd!ieff dis#ouraged %ental efforts fo

sense of hu%or that should arise in seeing

)arti#ular for% of laughter that ha))ens

has #orre#tly identified it as #o%ing fro%

ignored unless e a$e u) or otherise

onditioned %ind- is drugged to slee)&

itive and )sy#hologi#al duality beteen "I

e)tan#e of the both sides of duality ill )r

de)th of ourselves& 1hen e fail to a##e)t

o))osite dire#tion ta$es )la#e hi#h usua

de)endent of the felt senses of "I" and "

ove%ents titled "I.e.+%" ,or "e.I.+%"

gle ith "I" and "e" at sides and "+%" at

+

I ?

) is a))ro)riate in res)e#t of its real valu

oo$ at the )heno%enon in ter%s of )hysi#

)ut u)side don be#ause a %ove%ent to

" or "dee)ening" hile a %ove%ent in the

e head&

e earlier.%entioned

" to e()erien#e the

y the noun and

ns#iousness as one

n&

##e)ting the

#hange a )arti#ular

n your belly& In %y

#hara#teristi#s of

ould be asso#iated

the air o#tave and

o )arti#ularly if one

i#ator& If one's

s is so total that his

does not ha))en

This is natural

)er#eived dualities&

self.re%e%bering&

the both sides of

hen you s%o$e grassF

he aareness of

ur stu)id se#retary

and "e" the

odu#e in us an

the duality a

lly results in #linging

" but only be#ause it

- the gestures in

the to)&

and the higher

al sensation

ard this "+%ness" is

o))osite dire#tion is


16/21

In referen#e to the #ha)ter title

Gurd!ieff's ritings ,"*ife is real

ith "Inner orld" and "5uter

ter%s of )hysi#al sensation-& 1

#hara#teristi# of self.re%e%beri

This si%ultaneous aareness o

ill )rodu#e an invisible %ove

that the dividing line beteen t

and therefore #hanging every

re%ain #onstant giving us o))

Self.re%e%bering understood i

#hanging )atterns of dualities&

flu#tuating dividing line:

;hanging reality of inner orld

To be aare of #hanging reality

I #an be a hindaran#e& To %a$e

e(er#ise" hi#h is usually for%

or dooray&" If you are obsess

attitude of observation or estab

threshold then you ill %iss h

)er#e)tions as you )assed the

standing itness to these #han

5bserving I be#ause a #ertain t

a))re#iating this so%ething&

Gli%)ses into the nature of our

beteen our #onstantly.#hangi

the )hysi#al boundary of our )r

interfa#e beteen your hi) and

orlds here e #an find ourse

turn your )hysi#al attention to

#hair or turn your )hysi#al atte

s$in& Trying to $ee) the to.a

#hange your breathing or you

ith this to.ay flo&

+ si%ilar e()erien#e #an be )ro

Standing ere#t and rela(ed bri

sensation and %ood bringing t

and %ood& Shifting the eight

the #ontrast and then sto))ing

d "The 5uter and Inner 1orld of an" in t

only then hen I a%"- a si%ilar triangle

orld" at sides and "Eeal Inner 1orld" at t

ith this understanding the division of atte

ng #an be re)resented in the folloing a

Eeal Inner 1orld

Inner orld A..../ 5uter orld

the inner orld and outer orld if e #an

ent to a dee)er layer of our being& Here

e inner orld and outer orld is s)e#ifi# t

o%ent& 5nly the fa#t of duality and the )r

rtunities to "re%e%ber ourselves alays

this ay is a very dyna%i# a#t of balan#i

hanges are ha))ening #onstantly on both

P ;hanging reality of outer orld

on both sides of the dividing line the fi(a

this )oint %ore tangible I ta$e the e(a%

ulated as "re%e%ber yourself ea#h ti%e y

d ith the 5bserving I you ill assu%e th

lish yourself around the 5bserving I ea#h t

your internal state has #hanged hen y

hreshold hile so%ething in you has re%a

es& This so%ething is not usually hat )e

y)e of letting.go at the sour#e of attention

real self %ust be loo$ed for at the )oint o

g inner orld and outer orld& This !ourne

esen#e& +s you sit on your #hair no be a

#hair be#ause it is e(a#tly on su#h an inte

lves& +fter being aare of this interfa#ing

our inner orld starting fro% sensing you

tion to the outer orld through sensing th

y flo of sensations ill )rodu#e an unusu

ill noti#e that inhalation and e(halation a

du#ed by trying to be aare of both sides

ging the eight to the right foot )rodu#es

he eight to the left foot )rodu#es a differ

hyth%i#ally beteen right and left hile b

in the e(a#t %iddle you %ay dro) don d

e third series of

an be #onstru#ted

e to) ,or botto% in

tion that is

:

a##e)t its intensity

e %ust re%e%ber

ea#h )er#e)tion

sen#e of a division

nd everyhere&"

g oneself in ever.

sides of the ever.

ion to the 5bserving

le of the "threshold

u )ass a threshold

e sa%e internal

i%e you )ass a

ou re#eived ne

ined the sa%e

)le #all the

ill be re8uired for

%eeting or #ollision

y is best started on

tentive to the

fa#e beteen to

lane you #an either

s$in against the

e #hair against your

al intensity and

e #losely #onne#ted

of any ty)e of duality&

a )arti#ular ty)e of

nt ty)e of sensation

ing fully aare of

e)er into yourself&


17/21

The Gurd!ieff ove%ents )rovi

being aare of the to sides of

aareness& + %a!ority of )eo)l

#on#erned ith fighting the dua

of shifting the eight al%ost e

dee)er into hi%self due to his u

to ays of living ith dualitie

realization of ourselves&

So%e ords fro% the Gurd!ieff

a))ro)riate %i(ture of air:

+, me, am 0 + wish to be myse

+ am

father, son

day, night

yesterday, tomorrow

Blue, red, blac), yellow

remorse, suffering, effort, h

yesterday, today, tomorrow,

Before #on#luding this essay I

Gurd!ieff's "Beelzebub's Tales t

gra%%ati#ally outrageous& +s a

stru#tures of the Beelzebub's T

beauty hi#h in the%selves ar

stories& The use of %any invent

and signifi#an#e of #on#e)ts #a

ith verbs& olloing the #o%)l

"%entation by for%" hi#h de

re8uired nevertheless to see in

Co, you put your attention on

accustomed, and you will be

(urd-ieff, ">;:%

6 /ddition:

+fter reading the first of to va

arti#le- no I feel a need to ad

e us ith a%)le o))ortunities to go dee)e

dualities and by a##e)ting . even loving .

attra#ted to the ove%ents hoever ar

lities than a##e)ting the%& 1ith the above

ery ne student goes u) into his head ins

n#ons#ious resistan#e to the )er#e)tion of

beteen hi#h the less.#hosen one is th

ove%ents that you %ay no be able to a

f.

pe

always

ould li$e to say so%ething about the sen

His Grandson" hi#h so%e )eo)le see%

for%er linguist I ould li$e to say that th

les are gra%%ati#ally i%)e##able and geo

re)resentations of universal las that he

ed ords is an intelligent #hoi#e be#ause t

arise and best #onveyed only in their vari

e( stru#tures of senten#es is in itself is an

ands a )arti#ular ty)e of attention e are

o the true nature of dyna%i# reality:

Beelebub, another attention than tha

ble to ha'e the same attention in life.

ransmutation of t%e Binary i

7uaternary

luable #o%%ents fro% +li ,dis)layed at th

d another diagra% to #larify the )oint& The

r into ourselves by

the intensity of this

e initially %ore

.%entioned e(er#ise

tead of settling don

dualities& 1e have

ay toard dee)er

ssi%ilate better ith

en#e stru#tures of

to regard

e senten#e

%etri#ally of star$

des#ribes in his

e %eaning of nouns

ous relationshi)s

e(er#ise in

not used to but

t to which you are

nto t%e

botto% of this

diagra% #onne#ts


18/21

the #ontent of our dis#ussion i

hi#h de%and a higher for% of

5ne sid

1hen loo$ing at this diagra%

invisible #ir#le and "#on#e)tual

this diagra% is in ter%s of one'

our being or going uptoard th

This four.ay diagra% #an be i

,6- any of our a#tions ha))en

love and hate for e(a%)le&

,2- The ty)i#al rea#tion of our

beteen the% is to #o%)ro%is

oneself ,or the i%age of hat o

diagra% this is an u)ard %ov

,3- The #enter in our head of i

i%)artial #on#lusion about the

#on#lusion is )oerful enough

e()erien#ed as a donard thr

5r it %ay ha))en the other a

and total a##e)tan#e of the to

%ove%ent donard to a dee)

)er#e)tion %ay stand itness t

$noledge&

,K- or the sa$e of our groth

%ove%ent and donard %ov

verti#al a(is& I believe that this

"trans%utation of the binary in

our head #enter- and effe#t ,in

,9- +##ording to Gurd!ieff the

been transfor%ed into the 8uat

)oints out the dire#tion of the s

)entagra% in %an here the fu

leads to the #o%)letion of the

+##ording to %y observation a

th one )ossible inter)retation of Gurd!ieff'

"%entation by for%"

;on#e)tual reality

e of duality A../ +nother side of duality

Cee)er reality

ou should see "dee)er reality" #loser to th

reality" further aay& +lso note that the ve

)hysi#al sensation: dro))ing downinto t

e head hi#h %ay or %ay not have a neg

ter)reted in %any ays:

in )endulu%.li$e %ove%ents beteen t

ind in seeing the dualities and the )endul

the dualities by ideas e()lanations and

ne %ay be#o%e by folloing "hat the 1o

e%ent&

)artial )er#e)tion if develo)ed enough

ituation hi#h in itself is an u)ard %ove

hoever it ill urge us to ta$e an a#tion&

ust&

y around& The a#t of o)ening ourselves to

sides of dualities %ay )rodu#e in us as a

er layer of our being& The #enter in our he

o this )ro#ess and gain so%ething fro% it i

it is desirable that a balan#e is a#hieved b

%ent thus )rodu#ing another double.hea

is the essen#e of hat Gurd!ieff des#ribed

o the 8uaternary" here there are: )lus

our being-&

bove is only the first half of the for%ula:

ernary "the se#ond )art of it s)ea$s for its

olution&" This is further related to the #ons

n#tioning of five loer #enters is har%oniz

olo%on's Seal&

%a!or )ro)ortion of individual and grou) e

le#ture on sy%bols

e #enter of an

rti#al orientation of

e dee)er layer of

ative #onnotation&

sides of dualities

%.li$e %ove%ents

false i%age of

r$ tea#hes"-& In the

ay rea#h an

%ent& If this

his urge is

the i%)artial sensing

result an invisible

d of i%)artial

n ter%s of real

teen the u)ard

ed arro along the

as the

%inus #on#lusion ,in

hen the binary has

elf and thereby

tru#tion of a

ed hi#h further

fforts #urrently done


19/21

under the na%e of the Gurd!ief

)aragra)h ,2- above& This is a

dire#tion #annot or$ together

individuals %oving in the dire#ti

ho be#a%e disa))ointed of th

and hel) ea#h other that is h

4isit 7lavan & Go's Ho%e)age&

18 Comments3 way attentionHi 7lavan and than$ you for a g

i thought you %ay be interesteThe Theory of ;elestial Influen

;ollin suggests that as ell asshould also re%e%ber a third )attention in to dire#tions hil,hatever that %ay %ean to e

Than$ you again

ali

ai9 nited ingdomalilouR%fungeadded 2003.0


20/21

avan9 ;a'an%ister&goUnifty&ne&!)added 2003.0


21/21

The practice of self0rememb

attempt to produce a certain

or #larifi#ation and also for #oI ould li$e to )oint out that thito the #enter of our being or a l

In this res)e#t "the birth of #o

distinguished fro% the birth ofsi%ultaneously then one's $no)ossible to see it as a )ro#ess tbinary into the 8uaternary&"

I find that this sub!e#t is #losel,;ha)ter 3

working with arrows

Documents