“working” with “data” data january 26, 2006 – pt542 bert chesworth
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: “Working” With “Data” data January 26, 2006 – PT542 Bert Chesworth](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062620/551b38cd550346d41a8b52bd/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
“Working” With “Data”
data
January 26, 2006 – PT542Bert Chesworth
![Page 2: “Working” With “Data” data January 26, 2006 – PT542 Bert Chesworth](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062620/551b38cd550346d41a8b52bd/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
The Question
• Can we reliably “feel” joint movement?
![Page 3: “Working” With “Data” data January 26, 2006 – PT542 Bert Chesworth](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062620/551b38cd550346d41a8b52bd/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Where “Working” & “Data” Meet
• Patients: Mixed Shoulder Problems
• Lateral Rotation of Shoulder
Chesworth et al, Phys Ther 78 (6), 1998; 593-601
• Movement Diagram
• Cyriax End-feel
![Page 4: “Working” With “Data” data January 26, 2006 – PT542 Bert Chesworth](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062620/551b38cd550346d41a8b52bd/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
What Was Done
• 2 PTs - 2 assessments
• shoulder lateral rotation
• 34 patients
• recorded pain & resistance findings
– movement diagram
– Cyriax end-feel
![Page 5: “Working” With “Data” data January 26, 2006 – PT542 Bert Chesworth](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062620/551b38cd550346d41a8b52bd/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
The Patients
• Patients:– wide spectrum of pathology:
• hyper & hypo mobile (instability vs frozen)• bony & soft tissue (fracture vs tendinitis)• surgical (cuff repair) & non surgical• anatomic and arthroplasty (TSR) joints
– Excluded:• dislocation, bony union problems• malignancy, CNS lesion• post-op contraindication to Lateral Rotation
![Page 6: “Working” With “Data” data January 26, 2006 – PT542 Bert Chesworth](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062620/551b38cd550346d41a8b52bd/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
The Clinicians
• Clinical practice: = 16 yr• Manual Therapy: = 14 yr• Instructors
– Professional PT program– CPA – OD continuing education
• Movement Diagram Use:– Teaching: >75 %– Clinical: < 50 %
![Page 7: “Working” With “Data” data January 26, 2006 – PT542 Bert Chesworth](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062620/551b38cd550346d41a8b52bd/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Procedure Overview
• Procedures:– reviewed
• movement diagram construction• end-feel category definitions
– random order of patients to assess x 2– no dx, no hx
![Page 8: “Working” With “Data” data January 26, 2006 – PT542 Bert Chesworth](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062620/551b38cd550346d41a8b52bd/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
The Assessment
• Evaluating lateral rotation– Supine, Shoulder: ~20º abd, Elbow: 90º flex– Subject:
• report - onset & change in pain• inform – no further mov’t
– PT:• Max 5 passive movements• Uninvolved – involved• Draw mov’t diagram• Record end-feel• Blinded to 1st assess’t findings
![Page 9: “Working” With “Data” data January 26, 2006 – PT542 Bert Chesworth](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062620/551b38cd550346d41a8b52bd/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
End-Feel Categories
![Page 10: “Working” With “Data” data January 26, 2006 – PT542 Bert Chesworth](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062620/551b38cd550346d41a8b52bd/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Movement DiagramFrom Your’s to Mine
P1
P2
Bev’s MD Study MD
![Page 11: “Working” With “Data” data January 26, 2006 – PT542 Bert Chesworth](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062620/551b38cd550346d41a8b52bd/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
H to P1
H to P2
V to P2H to R1
H to R2
V to R2
Movement DiagramMeasurements
H to L
![Page 12: “Working” With “Data” data January 26, 2006 – PT542 Bert Chesworth](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062620/551b38cd550346d41a8b52bd/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Results - What Will We See?
• Agreement / Reliability repeat assessments• Agreement / Reliability between PTs• Correlation among MD measures
• Measures– End-feel category – MD:
– Onset Pain / Resistance (H to P1, R1)
– MD:– Maximum Pain and Resistance (H to P2, R2)– Limit of movement (H to L, i.e. ROM)
![Page 13: “Working” With “Data” data January 26, 2006 – PT542 Bert Chesworth](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062620/551b38cd550346d41a8b52bd/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Before We See Results
• ICC: Reliability Coefficient
• Pearson r: Correlation Coefficient
• Both vary from 0 to 1• 0 = no reliability / correlation• 1 = perfect reliability / correlation
• Agreement: raw %, verbal descriptor for ‘k’
![Page 14: “Working” With “Data” data January 26, 2006 – PT542 Bert Chesworth](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062620/551b38cd550346d41a8b52bd/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Reliability Results - I1st vs 2nd Assessment
Single PT feel same thing twice?
When no true change?
![Page 15: “Working” With “Data” data January 26, 2006 – PT542 Bert Chesworth](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062620/551b38cd550346d41a8b52bd/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Reliability Results - IIPT A vs PT B
Two PTs feel same thing once?
When no true difference?
![Page 16: “Working” With “Data” data January 26, 2006 – PT542 Bert Chesworth](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062620/551b38cd550346d41a8b52bd/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Correlation Results - IOnset Pain / Resistance vs H to L
![Page 17: “Working” With “Data” data January 26, 2006 – PT542 Bert Chesworth](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062620/551b38cd550346d41a8b52bd/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Correlation Results - IIMax Pain / Resistance vs H to L
![Page 18: “Working” With “Data” data January 26, 2006 – PT542 Bert Chesworth](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062620/551b38cd550346d41a8b52bd/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
End-Feel Results
![Page 19: “Working” With “Data” data January 26, 2006 – PT542 Bert Chesworth](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062620/551b38cd550346d41a8b52bd/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Summary
• In Summary:
Correlations with H to L on MD: • .573 - .956 for H to P1, R1 (where we put ‘onset’ wrt ROM)• .914 - .999 for H to P2, R2 (where we put ‘max’ wrt ROM)
Good agreement assigning end-feel categories:
note: end-feel categories defined by end-range P/R
Good reliability between 1st & 2nd assessments
Good reliability between PTs, like having a 2nd round