workmen s compensation act 1923 196(2)

Upload: soumya-sahoo

Post on 06-Apr-2018

245 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/2/2019 Workmen s Compensation Act 1923 196(2)

    1/15

    WORKMENS

    COMPENSATION ACT-1923

  • 8/2/2019 Workmen s Compensation Act 1923 196(2)

    2/15

    Eligibility for compensation

    Part 1: Is the injured person a workman?Part 2: Did the work injury disable him for

    more than 3 days?

    Part 3:Did the accident arise in the course ofhis employment?

    > Notional extension of employment

    Part 4:Did the accident arise out of his

    employment?

    Situations when worker is not compensated

  • 8/2/2019 Workmen s Compensation Act 1923 196(2)

    3/15

    Compensation computation

    Fatal injuries{40% monthly wages of the deceased} X {relevant factor} mentionedin schedule 4

    subject to a minimum of Rs 20000

    Permanent / total disablement{50% monthly wages of the deceased} X {relevant factor}

    Subject to minimum of Rs 24000

    Permanent partial disablement> (schedule I, part II ) list of permanent partially disabling injuries

    > amount of compensation payable for total disablement is calculate> then % of that as indicated by the injury in schedule I, part II is taken

    Temporary disablement

    25% of workmens actual wages

  • 8/2/2019 Workmen s Compensation Act 1923 196(2)

    4/15

    Procedure for compensation

    Notice of accident

    Medical examination

    Claim for compensation Registration of the compensation

    agreements

    Commissioner for workmenscompensation

    appeal

  • 8/2/2019 Workmen s Compensation Act 1923 196(2)

    5/15

    Some special cases

    Jharkand high court DB: Project officer, Giddi A colliery CCL, Hazaribagh Vs.

    Sanjay Prasad Chaurasia & another 2005 ILLJ 891

    The workmens compensation act, 1923 Section 2(d) and 10-A

    child in the mothers womb at the time of its father- workers death is

    dependent. However, claim made by the child dependent after

    attaining majority, is barred by limitation

  • 8/2/2019 Workmen s Compensation Act 1923 196(2)

    6/15

    Kerela high court : V. Sukumaran Vs Union of India, 2005 Lab IC 2285

    The workmens compensation act ,1923- section 4-Osteoarthrits

    was not an occupational disease and hence the compensation

    under the act was not payable. The disease must be attributable

    to a specific injury arising out of and in the course ofemployment.

  • 8/2/2019 Workmen s Compensation Act 1923 196(2)

    7/15

    Orissa high court: National insurance company

    Ltd. Vs. Bijay Kumar Sahu2002 Lab IC ,1026

    The workmens compensation act ,1923- section 4-

    Powers of W.C. Commissioner to mould relief- the

    W.C. Commissioner has the powers to awardcompensation for temporary disablement even though

    the workman has claimed compensation for permanent

    disablement.

  • 8/2/2019 Workmen s Compensation Act 1923 196(2)

    8/15

    Modern Work Environment

    BPO and ITES

    Worksmen Compensation Act accepts owners Cab as the notional

    extension of work

    This Cab may be owned by the company or hired from any private

    contractor

    An employee who meets with any accident while in the owners cab

    may be compensated under this act

    As a HR personnel we should make company cab mandatory in the

    interest of employees, in night shifts

    This will also help in reducing the chances of litigation

  • 8/2/2019 Workmen s Compensation Act 1923 196(2)

    9/15

    Working out of office premises or from home

    If a person meets with an accident on the road while on his duty,

    will be compensated (notional extension of work)

    eg. A salesman, meets with an accident while on a journey to meet

    a client will be compensated under the act

    In its present form WC Act cannot cover employees working from

    their home

    It is difficult to prove the relationship between the injury and work in

    such situations

    Its better to cover employees under various medical insurances to

    protect them

  • 8/2/2019 Workmen s Compensation Act 1923 196(2)

    10/15

    Stress related to work

    Various research have proved that stress related diseases likeHyper-tension, Ulcers, Hemorrhage and Insomnia are on increase

    They also associate it with work related stress

    If an employee is able to establish the relationship between his

    disease and work, then he is eligible to get compensation It has to be proved on the basis of the report by a qualified doctor

    under the law

    As preventive measures we should try to create a work environmentto avoid unnecessary stress

    Regular health check ups

  • 8/2/2019 Workmen s Compensation Act 1923 196(2)

    11/15

    Section XII

    The employer is made liable to pay his contractorsworkman where he employs a contractor for trade orbusiness

    CASE: In state of Maharashtra Vs Mahadeo KrishnaWaghmode, [(1994) 2 LLN 829]

    The Bombay High Court observed that if the ESIS

    Hospital had a claim of indemnification by the contractorin respect of compensation payable to the dependants ofthe deceased, it was for the hospital to adopt appropriateproceedings.

  • 8/2/2019 Workmen s Compensation Act 1923 196(2)

    12/15

    Contd

    If the contractor is not a genuine contractor, and ismerely an agent of the (principal) employer, Section XIIwould not come into play and it would be only theprincipals liability.

    In S. Kaloo & Sons. Vs Ofatannessa Bibi [42 CWN803(Cal)], the Calcutta High Court held that thedeceased had been employed directly under the former;and that if there was any contract, it was not a contractto do the whole or any part of the work, but merely acontract for the supply of labour at a certain rate ofwages per head.

  • 8/2/2019 Workmen s Compensation Act 1923 196(2)

    13/15

    Sub-Section (1) of Section XII

    In order to come within the aforesaid, the principal in thecourse of the purpose of his trade must have enteredinto a contract with the contractor and also the workwhich is the subject-matter of the contract shouldordinarily form the whole or part of the business.

    In Rabia Md. Vs Agent, GIP Rly. [AIR 1929 Bom 179:(1929) ILR 53 Bom 203] the Bombay High Court heldthat the case did not fall within sub-section (1)

    In Payyannur Educational Society Vs Narayani, [(1996) 3Supp LLJ 1212] the Kerala High Court rejected theappellants contention.

  • 8/2/2019 Workmen s Compensation Act 1923 196(2)

    14/15

    Sub-Section (2) of Section XII

    It provides that the principal employer will beentitled to be indemnified by the contractor incase the former is required to pay compensationto the contractors employees.

    In Triveedhi Peerayya Vs Executive Engineer,Dam Division, N.S. Dam, Vijayapuri North

    [(1988) 2 LLN 483 AP] the court observed thatthe negligence was on the part of the principalemployer and so, was not entitled to beindemnified by the contractor.

  • 8/2/2019 Workmen s Compensation Act 1923 196(2)

    15/15

    Sub-Section (4) of section XII

    The provisions shall not apply in any case

    elsewhere than on, in, or about the

    premises.

    In Bhuvaneswari Rice Mill, Guntur Vs

    Mannava Pullayya [AIR 1964 AP 392], the

    court observed that the accident occurred

    at a place where the work in question wasbeing executed.