wou assessment 2
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
Running head: Assessment Report MSSP
Running head: Assessment Report MSSP
Assessment Report for Multicultural Student Services and Program
Western Oregon University 2006
Wendy Alemán
Graduate Student, College Student Services Administration
Oregon State University
Running head: Assessment Report MSSP
Needs Assessment Overview
The purpose of this assessment was to evaluate the use of services of the Multicultural Student
Services and Program (MSSP) by students identified as students of color on the Western Oregon
University campus. To evaluate the use of services offered by the MSSP office, it was
determined that assessment data should provide MSSP with demographic information for
students typically using the services and those who have not accessed services offered by MSSP.
The rationale for the assessment is to provide MSSP with data to assist in improving services,
program planning, and outreach to students on the Western Oregon University campus.
Methodology The first step in this program assessment was to develop a small focus group with students who
currently use services provided by MSSP. Due to schedule conflicts, two small focus groups
were conducted with students who used MSSP for various reasons (Diversity Scholar, student
clubs advised by MSSP, etc.). These focus groups allowed me to obtain the student perspective
on MSSP services. In addition, discussion with the two groups afforded me with sufficient
background to develop questions for further exploration. Due to the number of students of color
on the Western Oregon University campus, the assessment tool selected was an online survey.
Because the survey would ultimately evaluate two students groups, those that used MSSP
services and those who did not use the services of MSSP, Questionpro.com was used for its
ability to provide branching questions and skip logic.
Findings from the focus group were used to develop survey questions. Questions went under
several revisions and review by several colleagues and professionals in assessment before a final
test survey was created. Participants from the original focus groups were invited to take the
online survey and asked to take notes on the survey questions. After taking the online survey,
students were asked to rejoin a focus group to discuss their understanding of each question.
This testing group provided valuable feedback used to clarify or refine questions and develop the
final online survey distributed to students.
The invitation to participate in the online survey was emailed to 544 Western Oregon University
student email accounts. As an incentive to complete the survey, student participating in the
Running head: Assessment Report MSSP
survey were given an opportunity to receive a gift certificate at a local pizza restaurant.
Reminder emails were sent on two additional occasions as means to increase the overall response
rate. Reminder emails were initially sent to all those in the database who had not responded. A
second survey reminder was sent to all respondents. This created a total of eight repeat
respondents. In comparing data, two of the eight repeat respondents were invalidated by faulty
information self-reported in the demographics of their survey responses. For the remaining six
repeat survey respondents, their second surveys were removed from the data set; their original
survey responses remain in the data set used in evaluation. Students who completed the survey
more than once were removed from the pool of eligible respondents for the gift certificate.
Nine students dropped out of the survey before answering a single question and three began
answering questions but dropped out before completing the survey. Of the three dropouts, one
identified as multiracial, one identified himself as white, non-Hispanic, and the third student as
Hispanic American/Latino/Chicano. Of the three dropouts, one indicated an awareness of the
MSSP existence, but no need of the services provided (the student reported a 3.00-3.49 GPA).
The White student who dropped out of the survey indicated he had no knowledge of MSSP
before the survey. The third dropout was a Hispanic American/Latino/Chicano male and
dropped out of the survey after he reported his GPA (2.00-2.49). Any reported data by these
individuals are included in the final data set.
Questionpro.com allowed question branching and skip logic in the online survey. After
demographic questions, the survey branched out into those who had heard of MSSP before the
invitation to the survey (75% of respondents, n=57) and those who had not heard of MSSP. Of
the 57 respondents who had heard of the MSSP office, 43 knew of its location. Of the 43
respondents aware of MSSP and its location, 37 reported using the services of MSSP, while the
remaining had not. This report will explore differences in data reported by users of MSSP in
comparison to those who have not used its services or were unaware of MSSP.
Of the 544 emails delivered to student email accounts, 84 students completed the survey from
beginning to end. After removing duplicates and invalid respondents, 77 surveys remained for
final data analysis (this includes three individuals who did not complete the entire survey).
Given the number of respondents (n=77) against
confidence factor is 90% with an
14%. The average time to complete the online survey was five
Findings Overall Demographics The majority of respondents in the MSSP survey identified as female
Hispanic American/Latino/Chicano
as their native language (71.43%, n=55),
(56.58%, n=43), enrolled at WOU fulltim
students, non-transfer (66.23%, n=51).
Overall, the survey results are broken up into
prior to the survey (n=19), those who
and those who use the services of MSSP (n=
Students Unfamiliar with MSSP
In this data set, 19 students (25%) replied that they were unfamiliar with MSSP. Give
response, using skip logic, these students were directed to questions regarding their use of
campus services and level of involvement
opportunity to list individuals or
offices that provided them with
support or encouragement at
WOU. While there does not
seem to be a common trend in
the demographics of this cohort,
what is significant is their overall
lack of involvement in either
student clubs or sports.
Running head: Assessment Report MSSP
Given the number of respondents (n=77) against the population surveyed (n=544), the overall
an 8.7% error level. The final response rate for this survey was
to complete the online survey was five minutes.
majority of respondents in the MSSP survey identified as female (68.83%, n=53
Hispanic American/Latino/Chicano (46.26%, n=36). In addition, the majority reported English
(71.43%, n=55), self-identified as first generation to attend college
enrolled at WOU fulltime (97.37%, n=74), and entered WOU as
transfer (66.23%, n=51).
Overall, the survey results are broken up into three themes: those who have never heard of MSSP
urvey (n=19), those who have heard of it, but never visited the MSSP
and those who use the services of MSSP (n= 37).
In this data set, 19 students (25%) replied that they were unfamiliar with MSSP. Give
response, using skip logic, these students were directed to questions regarding their use of
level of involvement. In addition, these students were offered an
opportunity to list individuals or
the demographics of this cohort,
what is significant is their overall
Running head: Assessment Report MSSP
the population surveyed (n=544), the overall
error level. The final response rate for this survey was
, n=53) and as
reported English
to attend college
as first year
those who have never heard of MSSP
the MSSP office (n=20)
In this data set, 19 students (25%) replied that they were unfamiliar with MSSP. Given students’
response, using skip logic, these students were directed to questions regarding their use of
offered an
Running head: Assessment Report MSSP
Etnicity of those not familiar with MSSPBiracial or
multiracial, 1, 5%
White, European American (Non-
Hispanic), 2, 11%
Alaskan Native, 0, 0%
Black, African American (Non-Hispanic), 1, 5%
American Indian, 3, 16%
Pacific Islander, 3, 16%
Middle Eastern, 1, 5%
North African, 0, 0%Hispanic
American/Latino/Chicano, 7, 37%
Asian American, 1, 5%
Alaskan Native
American Indian
Asian American
Black, African American(Non-Hispanic)
HispanicAmerican/Latino/Chicano
North African
Middle Eastern
Pacific Islander
White, EuropeanAmerican (Non-Hispanic)
Biracial or multiracial
Latinos, being the largest underrepresented group at WOU, represent the majority in this cohort;
Pacific Islanders (n=3) and American Indians (n=3) are the second majority, followed by two
students who identified as White. Other than a large percentage of students (75%) living in a
private home or apartment, there does not seem to be a common trends for this cohort.
Students Aware of the Multicultural Student Services and Program In this assessment, after demographic questions, students were asked if they were familiar with
MSSP. The skip logic and question
branching in questionpro.com
allowed the survey to direct students
who had heard of MSSP, yet who had
not accessed MSSP services, to
additional questions regarding their
decision not use the services offered
(n=20). Significant differences in
demographics exist between those
who access the services of MSSP and
those who have chosen not to seek
Ehtnicity of Non-MSSP User Who have heard of MSSPAlaskan Native, 1,
5%
American Indian, 2, 11%
Black, African American (Non-Hispanic), 1, 5%
White, European American (Non-Hispanic), 1, 5%
Pacific Islander, 2, 11%
Hispanic American/Latino/C
hicano, 4, 21%
Biracial or multiracial, 3, 16%
Asian American, 5, 26%
Alaskan Native
American Indian
Asian American
Black, African American(Non-Hispanic)
HispanicAmerican/Latino/Chicano
North African
Middle Eastern
Pacific Islander
White, European American(Non-Hispanic)
Decline to respond
Biracial or multiracial
services offered by the program.
access services identified as Asian American f
identifying as biracial or multiracial are the third largest group forgoing services offered by
MSSP. In addition, this group differs from MSSP users in generational status in education and
GPA. Eighty percent of students
in this group had GPAs between
3.00-3.99. In contrast to MSSP
users, 60% of students in this
group had one or two parents who
graduated from college. In regards
to their levels of involvement, 60%
of students in this group did not
report any involvement in clubs or
sports. Finally, another 60%
reported their employment status as “Do not work.”
Students in this group selected the following reasons
need the services” (76.19%), didn’t know
Multicultural Student Services and
Of the respondents who have used MSSP services (64.91%, n=37), the majority self
Hispanic American/Chicano/Latino (70%),
followed by American Indian (11%) as the
second largest user group.
Several trends exist in this cohort of students. A
large percentage (59.5%) of students in this
group reported a GPA between 2.50
students in this data set were enrolled in school
fulltime; 53% reported working part
39% reported not working at all. Students in this
Running head: Assessment Report MSSP
services offered by the program. The largest ethnic group who heard of MSSP but choose not to
access services identified as Asian American followed by Hispanic American. Students
identifying as biracial or multiracial are the third largest group forgoing services offered by
MSSP. In addition, this group differs from MSSP users in generational status in education and
of students
between
group had one or two parents who
In regards
to their levels of involvement, 60%
involvement in clubs or
reported their employment status as “Do not work.”
group selected the following reasons for not visiting the MSSP office: “Did not
didn’t know about it (9.52%), chose not to visit (9.52%).
Multicultural Student Services and Program Users
Of the respondents who have used MSSP services (64.91%, n=37), the majority self
Hispanic American/Chicano/Latino (70%),
(11%) as the
Several trends exist in this cohort of students. A
large percentage (59.5%) of students in this
group reported a GPA between 2.50-3.49. All
students in this data set were enrolled in school
ed working part-time and
not working at all. Students in this
Non-MSSP Users Educational Generational Status
First-Generation, 8, 40%
1 Parent graduated from college, 6,
30%
Both parents graduated from college, 6, 30% First-Generation
1 Parent graduated from college
Both parents graduated fromcollege
Running head: Assessment Report MSSP
of MSSP but choose not to
ollowed by Hispanic American. Students
identifying as biracial or multiracial are the third largest group forgoing services offered by
MSSP. In addition, this group differs from MSSP users in generational status in education and
for not visiting the MSSP office: “Did not
(9.52%), chose not to visit (9.52%).
Of the respondents who have used MSSP services (64.91%, n=37), the majority self-identified as
Non-MSSP Users Educational Generational Status
First-Generation
1 Parent graduated from college
Both parents graduated fromcollege
Running head: Assessment Report MSSP
Educational Generation Status
73%
24%
3%Firs t-Generation
1 Parent graduatedfrom college
Both parentsgraduated fromcollege
data set were largely involved in either MEChA or Multicultural Student Union (MSU) (62%).
It is hard to say if this is representative of the typical MSSP user or a representation of the clubs’
awareness of the MSSP assessment and closer contact with the office. In general, the majority of
MSSP users (70%) reported some type of
campus involvement (groups advised by
MSSP, sports, or other types of student
clubs). In addition, a little over half of the
students in this group self-reported as a
Diversity Scholar (57.75%). The data set
also shows that most MSSP users are either
in their freshman or senior year (62%). The
majority of students in this group have been
enrolled at Western Oregon University since their first year of college (76%). While
involvement is strongly represented in this cohort, the most significant attribute of MSSP users
are their educational generational status. The majority of students in this group (73%) are the
first in their families to attend college.
The top five services access by MSSP users were reported as the following: I’m a diversity
scholar, personal advice, advice about classes to take, information about scholarships, and help
with financial aid. In terms of communication between the office and students, most students
reported a comfort with in-person (drop-in) or phone communication with MSSP. In contrast,
the majority reported hearing about services or events offered by MSSP via email
communication.
To gauge student perceptions regarding staffing, location, and relationship with clubs advised by
MSSP, three likert questions (agree/degree) were included in the assessment. Most students
(32.43%) agreed that the MSSP office is well staffed. The majority (29.73%) of students
reported feeling neutral about the location of MSSP; however, the remaining majority either
agreed or strongly agreed that MSSP is centrally located. Finally, approximately half (n=18) of
the students in this group felt neutral, agreed, or strongly agreed that “MSSP and the
Multicultural Student Union (MSU) are the same,” while the remaining half (n=18) strongly
Running head: Assessment Report MSSP
disagreed or disagreed with this statement (n=1 selected not applicable to the statement). This
split in response to this last likert question may represent some confusion among students who
are not directly involved with the MSU student club in contrast to those who participate in MSU
(in this data sample, n=19).
When asked to provide suggestions for services students would like MSSP to provide, some
students reported the following (response categorized into five areas):
Resources: A location were students can borrow books on classes to eliminate some of the cost of books; a cool book shelf thing where students can bring in books for others to share them it would be much less expensive than having to buy them; Resume Workshops;. Lab Tops, calculators Staffing issues or location: At least two full time staff members, because so many students go for quick questions and many times have to leave and make an appointment to return for an answer; Currently we have a part-time secretary. I would like to have her as full-time. This way I can get help during office hours; I would just like it to have a much more central location. Like in the student union Outreach: also, each program that they organize are great all around, the only downside to each of them is attendance. mssp needs to figure out another way to advertise their events. for instance, i was talking to my friend about el dia de los muertos on monmouth ave, where all the posters are. well, my friend was surprise and did not know of the event. then i pointed to the poster ad right behind him, ' you don't More activities that involved other clubs reed them' i said. and my friend said 'NO'. so is up to mssp to decide where to spend the money for effective publicity; More programs; more involvedness in campus. getting people from different ethnicities involved; More outreach to multicultural students and more multicultural activities such as traditional foods night or traditional dance lessons, storytelling, cultural field trips; Some fun activities Financial aid and scholarships: More scholarships available; scholarship and loan assistance. No changes: they already have good services; its a complicated questions since its difficult to think of a program that they dont have. but im sure there is more services to offer such as helping students how to do their own schedule by the end of their freshmen year. some don't ever learn simply because the program provide that skill students never learn. They are doing good with what they provide; none everything is well; None other than what they already do.
Running head: Assessment Report MSSP
Ethnicity of ALL non-MSSP Users
Black, African American (Non-Hispanic); 2; 5%
Alaskan Native; 1; 3%
Hispanic American/Latino/Chi
cano; 11; 28%
Middle Eastern; 1; 3%
North African; 0; 0%
Pacific Islander; 5; 13%
Asian American; 6; 16%
American Indian; 5; 13%
Biracial or multiracial; 4; 11%
Decline to respond; 0; 0%
White, European American (Non-Hispanic); 3; 8%
Alaskan Native
American Indian
Asian American
Black, African American (Non-Hispanic)
HispanicAmerican/Latino/Chicano
North African
Middle Eastern
Pacific Islander
White, European American(Non-Hispanic)
Decline to respond
Biracial or multiracial
All Non-MSSP Users
To distinguish MSSP users from those who do not use MSSP services (regardless of previous
knowledge) a combined graphic of ethnic identity is provided below. Shown here is
demographic data for all those who were not familiar with MSSP (n=19) as well as those who
had chosen not to use the service of MSSP (n=20).
Initial Recommendations/Implications for Practice
Overall, the data reveals some interesting facts about the ethnic background of MSSP clients (or
users) and non-MSSP clients. Demographically, most MSSP clients identified either as
Hispanic/Latino/Chicano (the largest ethnic group at WOU) or as American Indian, the fourth
largest ethnic group at WOU (WOU Quick Fact Sheet, 2005; see appendix 2). In contrast, Asian
Americans, the second largest ethnic group on campus, tied with students who identified as
Black/African American as the third largest group to access MSSP services. While students who
identified as Asian American visited MSSP, no Pacific Islanders reported visiting the office. In
the graph of non-MSSP users, Asian Americans/Pacific Islanders (put together) make up 28% of
those who have not visited the office. Taken as a whole, the demographic breakdown of students
brings a few questions to mind. Why is the second largest ethnic group on campus not obtaining
MSSP services as often, or at higher rate, as American Indian students? Further exploration of
this question could be tackled using advance features in questionpro.com or targeted specifically
in a new survey. It is possible that more outreach to this group will increase visits to the MSSP
Running head: Assessment Report MSSP
office, however, the Asian/Pacific Islander umbrella is composed of a very diverse group of
students from varying backgrounds of origin. Unlike the ethnic majority at WOU (Mexican or
Mexican Americans make up the majority of Latinos in Oregon), there is no unifying culture or
language among students in the Asian/Pacific Island category. In spite of this, programming for
students who identify as Asian American/Pacific Islander may increase visits to the MSSP office.
Given that a large percentage of MSSP users are involved in one of the student clubs advised by
MSSP, greater outreach by Multicultural Student Union club members to Asian/Pacific
Islanders, by proximity, may increase awareness of MSSP and its services. Due to the lack of
representation of Pacific Islander in the MSSP user cohort, further exploration is recommended
to determine if Pacific Islanders are accessing support and services from other departments at
WOU. In addition to Pacific Islanders, students who identify as biracial or multiracial are not
represented in the MSSP user cohort; further study is recommended to understand this complex
group of students and their decision to forgo services offered by MSSP. Finally, students who
identify as Black (non-Hispanic) represent the third largest ethnic group at WOU (enrollment
data for 2005:
http://www.ous.edu/dept/ir/reports/enrollment_reports_2005/erdd04_05f4wk_wo.htm) while
American Indian/Native Alaskan represent the fourth largest group. Is there a factor that
explains why greater numbers of American Indian/Alaskan Native access MSSP services more
often in comparison to Asian American and Black students? Further analysis of the data points
to level of involvement as possible explanation the significant number of American
Indians/Alaskan Natives using MSSP services (i.e. MSSP advising a club that organizes Native
American events).
Approximately seventy percent of the MSSP user cohort reported some level of involvement,
including 62% of who reported direct involvement with MSU or MEcHA. It is likely that club
activities by either MSU or MEcHA have had a greater number of sponsored events or activities
focused on American Indian and Hispanic American/Latino/Chicano students than other ethnic
groups; such a focus may explain the high number of American Indian students involved in club
activities by groups advised by MSSP and their overall access of MSSP services. If club
involvement in one of the MSSP advised groups (MSU or MEcHA) predicates uses of MSSP
Running head: Assessment Report MSSP
services, club activities or events centered on Asian American/Pacific Islanders may lead to an
increase in MSSP visits by students who identify under this umbrella category.
Perhaps the most significant finding in the survey data is the educational status of the student
majority accessing MSSP services. Seventy-three percent of MSSP students responded that
neither of their parents attended college. Given this finding, services that focus on helping first-
generation students in their transition to college and supporting them during college should be a
high priority in guiding programming. Recommendations for services for this group of students
could include workshops on finding and applying for scholarships, time management, learning
style surveys and their application to studying, career exploration sessions, resume and cover
letter writing, and study table sessions, learning communities, etc. While some of these
services are already provided by MSSP, I would recommend a stronger focus on services
targeted to first-generation MSSP students.
In general, MSSP provides great services to students who access them. While Asian
American/Pacific Islander and Black/African American are larger in number than American
Indian/Native American students at WOU (enrollment data 2005:
http://www.ous.edu/dept/ir/reports/enrollment_reports_2005/erdd04_05f4wk_wo.htm), it is
difficult to deduce if the reason for their lack of representation in MSSP usage. For that reason,
greater outreach to students Asian American/Pacific Islander and Black/African American
students is recommended with circumspection.
Finally, it is challenging to assess how this survey would have differed from its online version in
a paper format. However, there was cost savings associated with the online survey in
comparison to mailing the survey to 544 students. In addition, a mail/paper version would have
also required students who completed the survey to take the additional initiative to buy a stamp
and return the survey via the mail. In general, I would recommend Questionpro.com for its
flexibility, ease for evaluating data, and cost savings. In spite of this, there is an additional cost
to using some of the specialized features of the database, which, in retrospect, is worth the
additional cost. Overall, more researched is required to understand the needs of students not
Running head: Assessment Report MSSP
using MSSP services. Various assessment tools should be considered for further study of MSSP
services.