wounded nucleons, wounded quarks, and relativistic ion collisions
DESCRIPTION
Wounded Nucleons, Wounded Quarks, and Relativistic Ion Collisions. Helena Białkowska Institute for Nuclear Studies Warsaw. What is a wounded nucleon?. Classic definition, given by Białas , Błeszyński & Czyż in 1976: It is a nucleon that underwent at least one inelastic collision. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
11Zakopane, June 06, HBZakopane, June 06, HB
Wounded Nucleons,Wounded Nucleons,Wounded Quarks,Wounded Quarks,and Relativistic Ion and Relativistic Ion
CollisionsCollisionsHelena BiałkowskaHelena Białkowska
Institute for Nuclear StudiesInstitute for Nuclear Studies
WarsawWarsaw
Zakopane, June 06, HBZakopane, June 06, HB 22
What is a wounded nucleon?What is a wounded nucleon?• Classic definition,
given by Białas, Błeszyński & Czyż in 1976:
It is a nucleon that underwent at least one inelastic collision
Zakopane, June 06, HBZakopane, June 06, HB 33
The WNM (1976!) – as usual – The WNM (1976!) – as usual – started from experimental started from experimental
observation:observation:• Series of Fermilab expt`s
on h-A• also European NA5• and lots of emulsion data• Average multiplicity and
increases more slowly than the number of collisions
ddn /
hAhpA /
Zakopane, June 06, HBZakopane, June 06, HB 44
21 hphAA nnR /
And this is just the ratio of participants in p-A(1 from p and from nucleus A) and in p-p (2 protons)
Observation: ratio of multiplicities (hA/hp) behaves as
Zakopane, June 06, HBZakopane, June 06, HB 55
The Model:The Model:
Particle production in a nuclear collision -a superposition of independent contributionsfrom the wounded nucleons in the projectileand the target
Thus you can:1 just measure NN2 count the participants in h - A3 and you have particle multiplicity in h – A!
Zakopane, June 06, HBZakopane, June 06, HB 66
For p-A:works surprisingly well.from AGS energiesup to RHIC!
Notice:we check here both Npart scalingand pp scaling
Zakopane, June 06, HBZakopane, June 06, HB 77
New idea: not wounded New idea: not wounded nucleons but wounded quarksnucleons but wounded quarks
Andrzej Białas et al., 1977, Vladimir Anisovitch et al., 1978
qBqA
ABABR
Zakopane, June 06, HBZakopane, June 06, HB 88
Additive Quark ModelAdditive Quark Model
1982 Białas et al.:Specific predictions for nuclear collisions on the basis ofthe Additive Quark Model - with particle production fromthree sources:Breaking of the color strings between quarks fromthe projectile and the targetFragmentation of wounded quarks Fragmentation of spectator quarks
Zakopane, June 06, HBZakopane, June 06, HB 99
Pre-history: 1980Pre-history: 1980
2.06.3 dTa
CTa
P,d,,C on Ta, 4.2 GeV/NJINR DUBNA
Model: 3.0
1.07.1 dTa
Ta Model 1.6
AQM
Zakopane, June 06, HBZakopane, June 06, HB 1010
First real high energy nuclear beams:200 GeV/c O and S from SPSK. Kadija et al., ZPhysC66,393(1995) consistent parametrization of production rates of negatives – proportional to the No of wounded nucleonsand of kaons – proportional to wounded quarks
More history: NA35
Zakopane, June 06, HBZakopane, June 06, HB 1313
Now for RHIC A – A data:
Notice: AuAuscaled by ppat twice the energy!
s2
(to account for ‘leading baryon’)
PHOBOSWhite Paper
Zakopane, June 06, HBZakopane, June 06, HB 1414
Here it looks better
but… read the fine print!
AuAu normalizedto e+e-
Almost the same plot
Zakopane, June 06, HBZakopane, June 06, HB 1515
Look more closely at total multiplicity per Npart
Proportionality,but higher than for ppat the same energy
pp systematically lower
WNM does not work
for Au - Au
Zakopane, June 06, HBZakopane, June 06, HB 1616
Still, the scaling with NStill, the scaling with Npartpart
is surprisingis surprising
Au+Au35-40%,Npart = 98
Cu+CuPreliminary
3-6%, Npart = 96
62.4 GeV
Cu+CuPreliminary
3-6%, Npart = 100
200 GeV
Au+Au35-40%, Npart = 99
PHOBOS
dN/dPHOBOS
and not only for total multiplicities ::
Zakopane, June 06, HBZakopane, June 06, HB 1717
Cu+Cupreliminary
Au+Au
dydp/NdN
dydp/NdR
Tpp2
coll
TAA2
AA
PHOBOS Au+Au PRL 94,082304(2005) PLB578,297(2004) Cu+Cu PRL(2006) accepted
This ‘geometric’ scaling with Npart worksnot only for soft (low pt) data!
(courtesy ofBarbara Wosiek)
Zakopane, June 06, HBZakopane, June 06, HB 1818
A very specific come-back of A very specific come-back of WNMWNM
A.Białas & W.Czyż, first presented in Zakopane in 2004:a two-component WNM to describe d-Au at 200 GeV/c
Basic assumption:Superposition of independent contributionsfrom WN in the projectile and the targetApplies not only to the total charged multiplicitybut longitudinal spectra also
Zakopane, June 06, HBZakopane, June 06, HB 1919
Density of particles in A – B collision:
)()( yFwyFwdy
dNBBAA
AB
The model requires )()( yFyF AB
And the first consequence is
)(2
1)0( BAAB wwyR
(F is a contribution from a singlewounded nucleon)
Zakopane, June 06, HBZakopane, June 06, HB 2020
A. Białas, W. Czyż, Acta Phys. Pol. B36, 905(2005)
PHOBOSdAu 200 GeV
Zakopane, June 06, HBZakopane, June 06, HB 2121
For full (pseudo)rapidity range: construct symmetric and antisymmetric component
d
dN
d
dNG
)()()(
And compare to data:
Zakopane, June 06, HBZakopane, June 06, HB 2222
Symmetric and antisymmetric part Symmetric and antisymmetric part for several centralities dAu:for several centralities dAu:
ddN
ce
ntr
alit
y
Zakopane, June 06, HBZakopane, June 06, HB 2323
Two step particle production:1. Multiple color exchanges between partons from projectile
and target2. Particle emission from color sources created in step 1
(AB+Marek Jeżabek, Phys.Lett.B590,233 (2004))
Interpretation by the authors:
The contribution from one wounded nucleonextends over full rapidity rangeThere is a big difference between its symmetricand antisymmetric part
Zakopane, June 06, HBZakopane, June 06, HB 2424
Revival of wounded quarks Revival of wounded quarks concept for A - Aconcept for A - A
S. Eremin & S.Voloshin, Phys.Rev.C67, 064905 (2003)
As Recall:at midrapidity –increase of dN/dper participantwith Npart
Zakopane, June 06, HBZakopane, June 06, HB 2525
Try NTry Nq-partq-part instead of N instead of NNpartNpart
To calculate: use same Nuclear Overlap Calculation(K.J.Eskola et al.,Nucl.Phys.B323,37(1989))as for N-N, but change density and
Zakopane, June 06, HBZakopane, June 06, HB 2626
Calculating NCalculating Nn-partn-part and N and Nq-partq-part
partnN partqN
fm53.0d
fm)A86.0A12.1(R
fm17.0n
]d/)Rrexp[(1
n)r(n
3/13/1
30
0A
}]A
)s(T1[1){bs(sTd
}]B
)bs(T1[1){s(sTd|N
AAinelNN
B2
BBinelNN
A2
ABpartn
)zb(dzn)b(T 22A
30
q0 fm51.0n3n
9/inelNNqq
Mass numbers of collidingnuclei are 3 times larger,but their size is the same.
For pp the same procedurewith A=B=3, hard sphere R=0.8fm.
Zakopane, June 06, HBZakopane, June 06, HB 2929
Eremin & Voloshin
Scale bynucleon participants
Scale byquark participants
increase
perhaps slight decrease
(full vs empty: different
Zakopane, June 06, HBZakopane, June 06, HB 3030
How does it work at SPS?
Netrakanti & Mohanty, PRC70(2004)027901
look at WA98 data 158 GeV/n Pb-Pb
Nucleon participants
Quark participants
Zakopane, June 06, HBZakopane, June 06, HB 3232
Bhaskar De & S.Bhattacharyya PRC 71(2005) 024903look at NA49 data (SPS)
Noticelog scale…
nucleons
quarks
Zakopane, June 06, HBZakopane, June 06, HB 3333
Caveat:
D & B write about ‘integrated yields’ in figure caption, but show integrated yields for p, Kand midrapidity values for pbar, d
(plots to be re-done by NA49)
Zakopane, June 06, HBZakopane, June 06, HB 3434
Moreover...
When you put together light and heavy nuclei,you see that Npart is not a good scaling variablefor strange particles
Zakopane, June 06, HBZakopane, June 06, HB 3535
Now for the energy Now for the energy dependence:dependence:
R.Nouicer, nucl-ex/051244,2005
One step further: energy dependenceR.Nouicer nucl-ex/0512044
Midrapidity charged particle density normalized to:
Nucleon participants Quark participants
Zakopane, June 06, HBZakopane, June 06, HB 3636
Again: Caveat
The author normalizes pp data by the number of quark participants for ‘most central’ pp collisions
Is this a correct procedue?
Zakopane, June 06, HBZakopane, June 06, HB 3737
p+p 200 GeV
(Nq-part)inclusive 2.4 (Nq-part)central 3.5
(plot stolen from Barbara Wosiek,who noticed the problem)
Zakopane, June 06, HBZakopane, June 06, HB 3838
An attempt at a summary:An attempt at a summary:
Wounded nucleons remarkably successful in parametrization of global characteristics of particle production
Nobody expects everything to be just a multiplication of N-N but the proportionality
looks intriguing
Wounded quarks - perhaps better scaling?