writing frame for critically evaluating a report

17
Writing Frame for Critically Evaluating a Report DVT

Upload: howell

Post on 24-Feb-2016

26 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Writing Frame for Critically Evaluating a Report. DVT. “ Young professionals and gamers risk thrombosis” , . Lifeblood. Lifeblood is a British charity promoting thrombosis awareness. Look at the survey questions as well as the article. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Writing Frame for Critically Evaluating a Report

Writing Frame for Critically

Evaluating a Report

DVT

Page 2: Writing Frame for Critically Evaluating a Report

“Young professionals and

gamers risk thrombosis”,

Page 3: Writing Frame for Critically Evaluating a Report

Lifeblood• Lifeblood is a British charity promoting

thrombosis awareness.

• Look at the survey questions as well as the article.

Page 4: Writing Frame for Critically Evaluating a Report

http://www.newarknotts.co.uk/young-professionals-and-gamers-

risk-thrombosis/

Page 5: Writing Frame for Critically Evaluating a Report

• Make a list of the main findings

• Going through your lists, come up with • Positive aspects and • Concerns

Page 6: Writing Frame for Critically Evaluating a Report

Positive aspects of this survey:

• large enough sample, • online-so anonymous encouraging

people to answer truthfully, • clear definitions of an office worker

and a gamer.

Page 7: Writing Frame for Critically Evaluating a Report

Concerns: • Selection method not stated

• may not be random• potential for a high non-response rate-(workers too

busy)• only young people surveyed but findings

extrapolated to “9 million office workers” which may include other age-groups

• some ambiguous response options• dubious claim made: “eating lunch at a desk could

double risk of DVT”• it is staying seated that increases the risk, not

place of lunch

Page 8: Writing Frame for Critically Evaluating a Report

• There should be no ambiguity when answering a survey. This ComRes survey clearly defines an “office worker” and “a gamer” but offers the ambiguous response options: very often, fairly often, not very often in questions 9 to 12.

Page 9: Writing Frame for Critically Evaluating a Report

Go to • “Broadcasting Standards Poll” - 5

pages on

• Give 3 concerns you might have

Page 10: Writing Frame for Critically Evaluating a Report

• Sampling Error-hidden agenda, • has a very high non-response bias, • question concern: 3 different aspects

together in one question.

Page 11: Writing Frame for Critically Evaluating a Report

Read• “Opinion Divided on NZ-US Exercises”

Page 12: Writing Frame for Critically Evaluating a Report

Do you Know the background to this?

Page 13: Writing Frame for Critically Evaluating a Report

Potential unfamiliar vocabulary

• Exercises in the military sense and the two names “Galvanic Kiwi” and “Alam Halfa”

• ANZUS • rift• dubbed• Marine Corps• Reciprocal platoon exchange• Resuming, resumption

Page 14: Writing Frame for Critically Evaluating a Report

Potential unfamiliar general knowledge

• Role of Americans in NZ during world war II

• The ANZUS alliance• The origins of New Zealand’s anti-

nuclear policy and the banning of American ship visits.

Page 16: Writing Frame for Critically Evaluating a Report

• The margin of error is a statistic expressing the amount of random sampling error in a survey's results. The larger the margin of error, the less confidence one should have that the poll's reported results are close to the "true" figures; that is, the figures for the whole population. Margin of error occurs whenever a population is incompletely sampled.

Page 17: Writing Frame for Critically Evaluating a Report

Margin of error when there is only 1 group =