wsd’s committee structure steering committee superintendent, 4 administrators, 3 teachers teacher...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: WSD’s Committee Structure Steering Committee Superintendent, 4 Administrators, 3 Teachers Teacher CommitteePrincipal Committee 5 Administrators, 6 Teachers6](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081603/56649eb25503460f94bb9483/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
![Page 2: WSD’s Committee Structure Steering Committee Superintendent, 4 Administrators, 3 Teachers Teacher CommitteePrincipal Committee 5 Administrators, 6 Teachers6](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081603/56649eb25503460f94bb9483/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
WSD’s Committee Structure
Steering CommitteeSuperintendent, 4 Administrators, 3 Teachers
Teacher Committee Principal Committee
5 Administrators, 6 Teachers 6 Administrators, 5 Teachers
![Page 3: WSD’s Committee Structure Steering Committee Superintendent, 4 Administrators, 3 Teachers Teacher CommitteePrincipal Committee 5 Administrators, 6 Teachers6](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081603/56649eb25503460f94bb9483/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
WSD’s Committee GoalsDevelop evaluation tools that reflect current research and
promote professional growth.
Review the current tools and retain those aspects that are effective and eliminate or revamp those aspects that are not.
Build off of previous work and experiences.
Effectively use multiple measures of student growth for building/instructional improvement
Develop tools that are truly beneficial, not just the fulfillment of a requirement.
Develop a teacher evaluation system that reflects the WSD vision of becoming a world class school district.
![Page 4: WSD’s Committee Structure Steering Committee Superintendent, 4 Administrators, 3 Teachers Teacher CommitteePrincipal Committee 5 Administrators, 6 Teachers6](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081603/56649eb25503460f94bb9483/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
The ProcessReview of the ResearchIdentify research-based characteristics of effective teacher evaluation.
Instructional Framework Development: Dr. Robert Marzano
Marzano’s framework is based on the belief that all teachers can improve. We were able to shift our thinking from an evaluation model that finds a teacher satisfactory or not, to an evaluation model that requires growth of every teacher on a specific scale.
![Page 5: WSD’s Committee Structure Steering Committee Superintendent, 4 Administrators, 3 Teachers Teacher CommitteePrincipal Committee 5 Administrators, 6 Teachers6](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081603/56649eb25503460f94bb9483/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
The ProcessEvaluation Tool FormatReview current WSD evaluation tool and gather
feedback on its strengths and weaknesses.Look at sample evaluation tools from around
the U.S. using our evaluation rubric and identify aspects for implementation into the new WSD tool.
Agree upon the format for the new evaluation tool and the 4 tier language.
![Page 6: WSD’s Committee Structure Steering Committee Superintendent, 4 Administrators, 3 Teachers Teacher CommitteePrincipal Committee 5 Administrators, 6 Teachers6](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081603/56649eb25503460f94bb9483/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
The Process
Rubric DevelopmentDiscuss and unwrap each criterion.Align Marzano’s Framework to each criterion.
![Page 7: WSD’s Committee Structure Steering Committee Superintendent, 4 Administrators, 3 Teachers Teacher CommitteePrincipal Committee 5 Administrators, 6 Teachers6](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081603/56649eb25503460f94bb9483/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
![Page 8: WSD’s Committee Structure Steering Committee Superintendent, 4 Administrators, 3 Teachers Teacher CommitteePrincipal Committee 5 Administrators, 6 Teachers6](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081603/56649eb25503460f94bb9483/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
![Page 9: WSD’s Committee Structure Steering Committee Superintendent, 4 Administrators, 3 Teachers Teacher CommitteePrincipal Committee 5 Administrators, 6 Teachers6](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081603/56649eb25503460f94bb9483/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
The ProcessDevelopment of the Evaluation Process.Identification of evidence/measures for
evaluating each of the performance criterion.
Created a differentiated process for evaluation, including timelines, forms for goal-setting, self-assessment/reflection, and the summative evaluation report.
Discussed issues regarding student growth data.
![Page 10: WSD’s Committee Structure Steering Committee Superintendent, 4 Administrators, 3 Teachers Teacher CommitteePrincipal Committee 5 Administrators, 6 Teachers6](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081603/56649eb25503460f94bb9483/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
![Page 11: WSD’s Committee Structure Steering Committee Superintendent, 4 Administrators, 3 Teachers Teacher CommitteePrincipal Committee 5 Administrators, 6 Teachers6](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081603/56649eb25503460f94bb9483/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
![Page 12: WSD’s Committee Structure Steering Committee Superintendent, 4 Administrators, 3 Teachers Teacher CommitteePrincipal Committee 5 Administrators, 6 Teachers6](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081603/56649eb25503460f94bb9483/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Criterion #2
INSTRUCTION: The teacher uses research-based instructional practices to meet the needs of all students.
2.8 The teacher reflects and evaluates the effectiveness of instructional performance to identify areas of pedagogical strength and weakness.
![Page 13: WSD’s Committee Structure Steering Committee Superintendent, 4 Administrators, 3 Teachers Teacher CommitteePrincipal Committee 5 Administrators, 6 Teachers6](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081603/56649eb25503460f94bb9483/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Criterion #3 DIFFERENTIATION: The teacher acquires and uses specific knowledge about students’ cultural, intellectual, and social development to adjust their practice by employing strategies that advance learning.
3.1 The teacher plans and prepares for effective scaffolding of information within lessons and units that progresses toward a deep understanding and transfer of content.
3.2 The teacher uses data to plan and provide interventions that meet individual student learning needs, including ELL, Special Ed and students who come from home environments that offer little support for schooling.
![Page 14: WSD’s Committee Structure Steering Committee Superintendent, 4 Administrators, 3 Teachers Teacher CommitteePrincipal Committee 5 Administrators, 6 Teachers6](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081603/56649eb25503460f94bb9483/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Criterion #6 ASSESSMENT: The teacher uses multiple data elements (both formative and summative) to plan, inform, and adjust instruction and evaluate student learning.
6.1 The teacher uses multiple data elements to modify instruction.
6.2 The teacher uses multiple data elements to design and modify appropriate student assessments.
6.3 The teacher uses multiple measures to demonstrate student growth.
![Page 15: WSD’s Committee Structure Steering Committee Superintendent, 4 Administrators, 3 Teachers Teacher CommitteePrincipal Committee 5 Administrators, 6 Teachers6](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081603/56649eb25503460f94bb9483/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Criterion #8 PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE: The teacher participates collaboratively in the educational community to improve instruction, advance the knowledge and practice of teaching as a profession, and ultimately impact student learning.
8.6 The teacher meets growth targets as identified in annual professional goals.
![Page 16: WSD’s Committee Structure Steering Committee Superintendent, 4 Administrators, 3 Teachers Teacher CommitteePrincipal Committee 5 Administrators, 6 Teachers6](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081603/56649eb25503460f94bb9483/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
![Page 17: WSD’s Committee Structure Steering Committee Superintendent, 4 Administrators, 3 Teachers Teacher CommitteePrincipal Committee 5 Administrators, 6 Teachers6](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081603/56649eb25503460f94bb9483/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
The Process
Implementation PlanDevelop pilot planSelection of participantsCreate a professional development planCalibration training (Walk Throughs and
Instructional Rounds)Develop a plan for evaluating the new tools
![Page 18: WSD’s Committee Structure Steering Committee Superintendent, 4 Administrators, 3 Teachers Teacher CommitteePrincipal Committee 5 Administrators, 6 Teachers6](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081603/56649eb25503460f94bb9483/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
![Page 19: WSD’s Committee Structure Steering Committee Superintendent, 4 Administrators, 3 Teachers Teacher CommitteePrincipal Committee 5 Administrators, 6 Teachers6](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081603/56649eb25503460f94bb9483/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
The ProcessCommunication Plan
Newsletter
District Website
Meetings
WENEA Rep Council
Principals’ Meeting
Building meetings
Parent Involvement
![Page 20: WSD’s Committee Structure Steering Committee Superintendent, 4 Administrators, 3 Teachers Teacher CommitteePrincipal Committee 5 Administrators, 6 Teachers6](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081603/56649eb25503460f94bb9483/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
![Page 21: WSD’s Committee Structure Steering Committee Superintendent, 4 Administrators, 3 Teachers Teacher CommitteePrincipal Committee 5 Administrators, 6 Teachers6](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081603/56649eb25503460f94bb9483/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
![Page 22: WSD’s Committee Structure Steering Committee Superintendent, 4 Administrators, 3 Teachers Teacher CommitteePrincipal Committee 5 Administrators, 6 Teachers6](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081603/56649eb25503460f94bb9483/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Lessons Learned
A collaborative working relationship is a must.
We didn’t know what we didn’t know, so technical support from WEA and OSPI has been extremely beneficial.
An instructional framework is critical for creating a teacher evaluation tool
The professional development for implementation will change the way we look at PD (aligned to framework vs. content specific, calibration training).
![Page 23: WSD’s Committee Structure Steering Committee Superintendent, 4 Administrators, 3 Teachers Teacher CommitteePrincipal Committee 5 Administrators, 6 Teachers6](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081603/56649eb25503460f94bb9483/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
•Time and timelines.•Changing our culture to a professional growth model for educators.•Refining the use of data as a measure of effectiveness and determining impact on student learning.•Maintaining professional development in the face of diminishing resources.