www rittmanmead com 2013 03 performance and obiee test desig

8/10/2019 Www Rittmanmead Com 2013 03 Performance and Obiee Test Desig

1/13

pdfcrowd comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

Home About Careers Clients Consulting Training Support Articles Blog

Performance and OBIEE part III Test DesignMarch 18th, 2013 by Robin M offatt

Having definedour test, we can now designit. Wordplay? Not really. Regardless of howwe run our tests, weve got to define

up front whatit is we are testing. Once weve got that, we can then work out how to actually create a test that sim ulates what

weve defined.

Pretty boring huh? Cant we jus t, yknow, like, run LoadRunner a bunch of times?

Sure, go ahead. But unless everything is hunky-dory and pass es with flying colours , youll on ly end up retrofitting the

definition to your test in order to properly analyse the problem and create further tests to get to root-cause. Therein lies the

path to madnes s, and more importantly, wasted time and poor quality tests.

Dont jump the gun and wade into the fun part, otherwise youll spend too much time trying to figure out what to buildinto

your test on the hoof ins tead of carefully working it out up front.

The OBI stackThe key to designing a good performance test, and comprehending the results from it, is understanding the OBI stack.

Doing so enables us to inject tests into the OBI stack at various po ints to focus our testing and reduce the time i t takes to

build a test. Being able to pinpoint where the work happens is also essential to focussing troubleshooting.

At a very high level, the s tack looks l ike this :

(NB this is not an exhaustive diagram, for example, it doesnt include any alternative security providers)

Search theblog

Recent Posts

Analytics w ith Kibana andElasticsearch through Hadoop

part 3 Visualising the data inKibana

Analytics w ith Kibana and

Elasticsearch through Hadoop part 2 Getting data into

Elasticsearch

Analytics w ith Kibana and

Elasticsearch through Hadoop part 1 Introduction

UKOUG Partner of the YearAw ards

Oracle BI Cloud Service for SaaSApplication Reporting Part 1:Integrating BICS toSalesforce.com using REST APIs

Top PostsOBIEE 11g Security Week :

Managing Application Roles andPolicies, and Managing SecurityMigrations and Deployments

Upgrading OBIEE to 11.1.1.7

OBIEE 11gR1 : Architecture andUse of WebLogic Server

OBIEE 11g Security Week :Connecting to Active Directory,and Obtaining Group Membership
http://www.rittmanmead.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/obiperf101-slide16.pnghttp://www.rittmanmead.com/2010/07/obiee-11gr1-architecture-and-use-of-weblogic-server/http://www.rittmanmead.com/2014/11/oracle-bi-cloud-service-for-saas-application-reporting-part-1-integrating-bics-to-salesforce-using-rest-apis/http://www.rittmanmead.com/2014/11/analytics-with-kibana-and-elasticsearch-through-hadoop-part-2-getting-data-into-elasticsearch/http://www.rittmanmead.com/2014/11/analytics-with-kibana-and-elasticsearch-through-hadoop-part-3-visualising-the-data-in-kibana/http://www.rittmanmead.com/author/robin-moffatt/http://www.rittmanmead.com/2012/03/obiee-11g-security-week-managing-application-roles-and-policies-and-managing-security-migrations-and-deployments/http://www.rittmanmead.com/2014/11/oracle-bi-cloud-service-for-saas-application-reporting-part-1-integrating-bics-to-salesforce-using-rest-apis/http://www.rittmanmead.com/2014/11/oracle-bi-cloud-service-for-saas-application-reporting-part-1-integrating-bics-to-salesforce-using-rest-apis/http://www.rittmanmead.com/2014/11/ukoug-partner-of-the-year-awards/http://www.rittmanmead.com/2014/11/ukoug-partner-of-the-year-awards/http://www.rittmanmead.com/2014/11/analytics-with-kibana-and-elasticsearch-through-hadoop-part-1-introduction/http://www.rittmanmead.com/2014/11/analytics-with-kibana-and-elasticsearch-through-hadoop-part-1-introduction/http://www.rittmanmead.com/2014/11/analytics-with-kibana-and-elasticsearch-through-hadoop-part-2-getting-data-into-elasticsearch/http://www.rittmanmead.com/2014/11/analytics-with-kibana-and-elasticsearch-through-hadoop-part-2-getting-data-into-elasticsearch/http://www.rittmanmead.com/2014/11/analytics-with-kibana-and-elasticsearch-through-hadoop-part-2-getting-data-into-elasticsearch/http://www.rittmanmead.com/2014/11/analytics-with-kibana-and-elasticsearch-through-hadoop-part-2-getting-data-into-elasticsearch/http://www.rittmanmead.com/2014/11/analytics-with-kibana-and-elasticsearch-through-hadoop-part-3-visualising-the-data-in-kibana/http://www.rittmanmead.com/2014/11/analytics-with-kibana-and-elasticsearch-through-hadoop-part-3-visualising-the-data-in-kibana/http://www.rittmanmead.com/2014/11/analytics-with-kibana-and-elasticsearch-through-hadoop-part-3-visualising-the-data-in-kibana/http://www.rittmanmead.com/http://www.rittmanmead.com/http://www.rittmanmead.com/http://pdfcrowd.com/http://pdfcrowd.com/redirect/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.rittmanmead.com%2f2013%2f03%2fperformance-and-obiee-test-design%2f&id=ma-141108035432-1b6c76d1http://pdfcrowd.com/customize/http://pdfcrowd.com/html-to-pdf-api/?ref=pdfhttp://www.rittmanmead.com/http://www.rittmanmead.com/about/our-teamhttp://www.rittmanmead.com/about/careers/http://www.rittmanmead.com/clients/http://www.rittmanmead.com/consulting/http://www.rittmanmead.com/training/http://www.rittmanmead.com/support/http://www.rittmanmead.com/articles/http://www.rittmanmead.com/blog/http://www.rittmanmead.com/http://www.rittmanmead.com/2013/03/performance-and-obiee-test-design/http://www.rittmanmead.com/author/robin-moffatt/http://www.rittmanmead.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/obiperf101-slide16.pnghttp://www.rittmanmead.com/2014/11/analytics-with-kibana-and-elasticsearch-through-hadoop-part-3-visualising-the-data-in-kibana/http://www.rittmanmead.com/2014/11/analytics-with-kibana-and-elasticsearch-through-hadoop-part-2-getting-data-into-elasticsearch/http://www.rittmanmead.com/2014/11/analytics-with-kibana-and-elasticsearch-through-hadoop-part-1-introduction/http://www.rittmanmead.com/2014/11/ukoug-partner-of-the-year-awards/http://www.rittmanmead.com/2014/11/oracle-bi-cloud-service-for-saas-application-reporting-part-1-integrating-bics-to-salesforce-using-rest-apis/http://www.rittmanmead.com/2012/03/obiee-11g-security-week-managing-application-roles-and-policies-and-managing-security-migrations-and-deployments/http://www.rittmanmead.com/2013/04/upgrading-obiee-to-11-1-1-7/http://www.rittmanmead.com/2010/07/obiee-11gr1-architecture-and-use-of-weblogic-server/http://www.rittmanmead.com/2012/03/obiee-11g-security-week-connecting-to-active-directory-and-obtaining-group-membership-from-database-tables/


2/13


3/13


For each Logical SQLreques t from Presentation Services, there will be one or morePhysical SQLqueries, but just one

resultset pas sed back to Presentation Services. For each Dashboardthere may be manyLogical SQLqueries run.

5 for the hammer, 95 for knowing where to hit itBuilding an accurate, flexible performance test rig takes time and therefore it is wis e to test only what needs testing. For

example:

DecisionsreplicationReportService RTDrunReportsampleappscreenscripting

securitystartup testingtrainingXML
http://pdfcrowd.com/http://pdfcrowd.com/redirect/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.rittmanmead.com%2f2013%2f03%2fperformance-and-obiee-test-design%2f&id=ma-141108035432-1b6c76d1http://pdfcrowd.com/customize/http://pdfcrowd.com/html-to-pdf-api/?ref=pdfhttp://www.rittmanmead.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/obiperf101-slide17a.pnghttp://www.rittmanmead.com/tag/performance-2/http://www.rittmanmead.com/tag/real-time-decisions-2/http://www.rittmanmead.com/tag/replication/http://www.rittmanmead.com/tag/reportservice/http://www.rittmanmead.com/tag/rtd/http://www.rittmanmead.com/tag/runreport/http://www.rittmanmead.com/tag/sampleapp/http://www.rittmanmead.com/tag/screen/http://www.rittmanmead.com/tag/scripting/http://www.rittmanmead.com/tag/security/http://www.rittmanmead.com/tag/startup/http://www.rittmanmead.com/tag/testing-2/http://www.rittmanmead.com/tag/training/http://www.rittmanmead.com/tag/xml/


4/13


If our performance test is for a g reenfield OBI deployment then wed be pretty foolish no t to conduct an end-to-end test.

We need to make sure that all the components are performing together at the required workload.

However, what about if were testing a existing mature deployment where theres a specific problem in the database? We

coulddo an end to end tes t, but if all thats changing is the database (for example, new indexes) then we s hould probably

jus t focus our tes t on the databas e.

What about if the RPD is changing in an existing deployment and nothing els e? Is there really any point performance

testing the respons e time all the way to the user? If the data returnedis the sam e then we can presume that the

performance in Presentation Servicesand back to the user is going to be the same. Therefore we can build a morestreamlined (and thus efficient) test agains t just the BI Server (because the RPD has changed) and the database

(because a changed RPD could generate different Physical SQL).

The flipside of not testing what doesnt need testingis to test what doesneed testingand may get overlooked. For

example , are your users connecting over 3G yet youre conducting your performance tests on a LAN?

Tools & Designs for OBI performance testing

There are s everal different ways to build a performance test for OBIEE. I have

described them here as well as suggested where each one is m ost

appropriate to use.

End-to-end (almost)

Traditional load tes ting tools s uch as JMeter, Oracle Application Testing Suite

(OATS), and HP LoadRunner can be used to simulate a user clicking on a

report in a web browser and recording how long it takes for the report to run.

They can have multiple report definitions, and run many concurrently. This is

usuall y sufficient for a comprehensive performance test. One should be awarewhen using these that there is s till an element that has not been tested:

1. Outbound. A user interacting with OBI uses a modern web browser with lots of asynchronous traffic (AJAX). Forexample , clicking on a prom pt to get a list of values, clicking on the dashboard menu to see a list of availabledashboards. A standard load tes t will typically only send the HTTP request necessary to trigger the dashboard refreshitself.

2. Inbound. A real users web browser will receive the data from a dashboard as it is returned from the OBI server andrender it. Once its finis hed rendering, it is viewable to the us er. If it is a large pivot table with hundreds of thousands ofcells (because thats how the Excel report were duplicating does it) then this might take many seconds or even
http://pdfcrowd.com/http://pdfcrowd.com/redirect/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.rittmanmead.com%2f2013%2f03%2fperformance-and-obiee-test-design%2f&id=ma-141108035432-1b6c76d1http://pdfcrowd.com/customize/http://pdfcrowd.com/html-to-pdf-api/?ref=pdf


5/13


minutes or even not work at all. Buta load test tool will pars e the data that comes back from the server, and once allthe datas received, it will mark that as the comple ted respons e time the time to render is not included.

This is not to dismis s this approach of test design generally it is a very good one. These are the s ubtleties that a standard

load test can overlook. The AJAX dashboard m enu call m ight not take long, but the list of values might be a hidden bottleneck

if it hits an unoptimis ed data source (for example, SELECT DISTINCT DIM_VALUE FROM 60M_ROW_UNAGGREGATED_DIM_TABLE).

It is im portant that the above limitations are noted, and the test design adjus ted to compensate where these weaknes ses

are obs erved (for example, large pivot tables, lis t of values, e tc).

Presentation Services via Web Services

Snuck in with the other goodies of SampleApp v207is LoadTest.jar. Youll find it in /home/oracle/scripts/loadtest, along

with a readme file detailing how to use it. It takes as input a single Das hboard path, and runs concurrent user requests

agains t it. Since it is us ing a dashboard path we can presume it is i nterfacing with Presentation Services, and my guess is
http://pdfcrowd.com/http://pdfcrowd.com/redirect/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.rittmanmead.com%2f2013%2f03%2fperformance-and-obiee-test-design%2f&id=ma-141108035432-1b6c76d1http://pdfcrowd.com/customize/http://pdfcrowd.com/html-to-pdf-api/?ref=pdfhttp://www.oracle.com/technetwork/middleware/bi-foundation/obiee-samples-167534.html?__hstc=150481449.d7849fee6016a5a848dcb7fe793f739e.1415436870818.1415436870818.1415436870818.1&__hssc=150481449.1.1415436870818&__hsfp=1770896186


6/13


that it utilises the OBIEE web servicesto generate the load.

This utility will presumably have the sam e limi tation as JMeter, LoadRunner et al in that page render times are no t included

in the respons e time. LoadTest.jar also only returns timings at a total level for a batch of concurrent users how long does it

take, in total, forxusers to run a given dashboard. Individual response times from the BI Server for the constituent queries

can be seen in Usage Tracking. LoadTest.jar could also be invoked multiple times to simulate multiple users/dashboards

and the timing for each invocation be recorded to get a more granu lar set of respons e times . Finally, LoadTest.jar can only

fetch a das hboard in i ts default state there is no apparent way to change prompt values or i nteract with hierarchical

columns , drill paths, etc.

An alternative to LoadTest.jar for this type of testing could be us ing JMeter to invoke the web s ervices, which cou ld give more

flexibility (at the expense o f time to s et it up and complexity to maintain).

BI Server + Database

The BI Server supports ODBC or JDBC for communication with clients (such as Pres entation Services). We can use a client

to send Logical SQL requests to it and record the respons e time. Because Presentation Services als o sends Logical SQL to

BI Server this test approach is a good one becaus e from the BI Server + Database point of view, the behaviour is exactly the

sam e whether the Logical SQL comes from Presentation Services or another client (eg injected by us for performance

testing).
http://pdfcrowd.com/http://pdfcrowd.com/redirect/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.rittmanmead.com%2f2013%2f03%2fperformance-and-obiee-test-design%2f&id=ma-141108035432-1b6c76d1http://pdfcrowd.com/customize/http://pdfcrowd.com/html-to-pdf-api/?ref=pdfhttp://docs.oracle.com/cd/E23943_01/bi.1111/e16364/part_page_2.htm?__hstc=150481449.d7849fee6016a5a848dcb7fe793f739e.1415436870818.1415436870818.1415436870818.1&__hssc=150481449.1.1415436870818&__hsfp=1770896186#BABIDGCG


7/13


nqcmdis the ODBC client that is p rovided with OBIEE. You can wrap this in a series of shell scripts to create a complete test,

or you could build a test using JMeterwith the OBIEE JDBC driverfor a more flexible and scalable test rig.
http://pdfcrowd.com/http://pdfcrowd.com/redirect/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.rittmanmead.com%2f2013%2f03%2fperformance-and-obiee-test-design%2f&id=ma-141108035432-1b6c76d1http://pdfcrowd.com/customize/http://pdfcrowd.com/html-to-pdf-api/?ref=pdfhttp://www.rittmanmead.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/perf02.png


8/13


What this m ethod doesnt testis Presentation Services and upstream, so the additional processing of resultsets, passing

the data back to the web browser, and the rendering of it. But, if you are targeting your testing at jus t the RPD and Database

then this is a very good way to avoid unnecessary complexity.

Database

If nothingin your OBI configuration has changed and you just want to test the

performance of the database, then you can jus t use s tandard database

performance test tools. Take the Physical SQL from the report being tested

and run it against the database using your databases standard tools.

This is useful if you are doing tuning work at the database level (partitioning,

indexing, etc), but only use this approachif nothingis chang ing in your RPD.

As soon as the RPD changes, different physical SQL could potentially result.

Remem ber also that the response time from a physical SQL executed on the

database is not the same as the response time of a report it still has to go
http://pdfcrowd.com/http://pdfcrowd.com/redirect/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.rittmanmead.com%2f2013%2f03%2fperformance-and-obiee-test-design%2f&id=ma-141108035432-1b6c76d1http://pdfcrowd.com/customize/http://pdfcrowd.com/html-to-pdf-api/?ref=pdf


9/13

df d mi b PRO i Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

back up through the stack back to the users web browser. For a complex

report or a large number of rows this can add sign ificant time.

The only genuine end-to-end test a

stopwatch!

I kid you not before spending weeks and building complex LoadRunner scripts,

stop and think about the testing you are doing. If you want to test all the das hboards

with a single user concurrency find a willing m onkey to sit there for 20 minutes andrun the dashboards. Maybe you need to test mul tiuser concurrency but can make do

with fewer dashboards tested this way than for a single us er.

This is also a very easy way to determine page render times. As I discuss ed in the

paragraph above, traditional load test tools s uch as LoadRunner and JMeter only

meas ure the time taken for an OBI dashboard to return data and not how long it takes to render i t. For the user obviously the

only time they are going to be interested in is the complete time including rendering. So using a stopwatch (or more

scientifically, inbuilt browser tools such as Chromes Developer Tools) you can measure the complete time as the user will

experience it.

Which tool?In an OBI performance test lifecycle I would expect to use several of the d ifferent tools described above. Typically a greenfield

test will look at the performance o f the stack end-to-end. If there are problems wi th the end-to-end, or if the testing is in

respons e to a problem in an existing system, I would use a response time profile(of which more later) to understand where

the bottleneck lay and focus the testing (and tuning) there. For example , if the bottleneck appeared to be the SQL that the

RPD was generating I might use nqcmdto validate changes I m ade to the RPD and/or the database model

Test Design tipsWhichever method you use, bear the following in m ind:

1. Generating a big load is easy; generating a big load that provides useful data is more difficult. For example , when a testshows 100 concurrent users running 10 different dashboards doesn t work, how do you break it down into componentsto see where the bottleneck is? A good test design wi ll take this into account up front and include granular res ponsetimes and instrumentation.

2. K.I.S.S.: Sometimes a set of shel l scripts run concurrently will do just as good a job of applying a high load to OBI as aproper load testing tool can. The timecomm and will always give you the duration o f an execution, and you canmodula rise sets of shell scripts to your hearts content.
http://pdfcrowd.com/http://pdfcrowd.com/redirect/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.rittmanmead.com%2f2013%2f03%2fperformance-and-obiee-test-design%2f&id=ma-141108035432-1b6c76d1http://pdfcrowd.com/customize/http://pdfcrowd.com/html-to-pdf-api/?ref=pdfhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KISS_principle?__hstc=150481449.d7849fee6016a5a848dcb7fe793f739e.1415436870818.1415436870818.1415436870818.1&__hssc=150481449.1.1415436870818&__hsfp=1770896186


10/13

df di b PRO i Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

1. If you use s hell scripting, dont forget to KISS a complex mess of shell scripts is nt Simple either.

3. You may see a conflict between the above points. How do you build a test that is granular and well instrumented, yetisnt overly complex? Well, therein lies the gold ;-) Because all performance tests are different, I can only outline heregood approaches to take, but you have to walk that line between com plexity and flexibility in your des ign.

Heuristic and Holistic performance testing

There is m ore than one way to evaluate the performance of OBIEE. Tools like those I have described above are great forsim ulating known workloads with a fixed definition. Unfortunately, all of these ass ume a known set of reports and predicates,

and user behaviour. What about testing a s ystem where there is ad hoc capabi lity and/or a great number of possible

predicate values and thus execution plans?

Here I would recommend a thorough reviewof the systems implementation, with the view to determining poss ible

bottlenecks before they occur. It is more difficult to prescribe this area as it comes down to a combina tion of personal

experience of good design , careful evaluation of right practices, and the ability to iso late and test particular configurations.

The difficulty with this type of testing is that is produces less tangible data with which to say yea or nayon a systems ability

to perform. It means that the audience for the performance test report mus t be receptive to It Depends. Just because a table

doesn t have a particular index doesnt mean in i tself that the performance test is a failure and the index must be defined

before go live. What it does mean is that the missing index maycause a worse execution plan which mayrequire additional

database resources which maylim it how many queries can run concurrently before a bottleneck is reached.

For specific sugges tions of what to examine in this type of evaluation, see here. I am well aware of the apparent contradiction

in advocating a heuristic approach here yet criticising best practices. My problem with bes t practices is when they are

treated as abs olutes and without context; they normally originate from good intentions and are s ubsequently abused. In the

context of evaluating a s ystems performance that is im poss ible to comprehensively test (eg ad hoc report workload) then

looking at how pas t implem entations of the technology is the only sensible option. The success of these past

implem entations may or may not be encoded as best practices; the point is that they are evaluated in

a conscious manner and not followed blindly.

Resource management

To reduce the risk to a Production system o f running ad hoc or untested reports, resource m anagement at the database level

could be us ed. On Oracle, Database Resource Manager(DBRM) enables queries to be allocated a greater or lower priority

for CPU on the database, or limit the execution time. Fixed reports which have been through a s trict performance QA process
http://pdfcrowd.com/http://pdfcrowd.com/redirect/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.rittmanmead.com%2f2013%2f03%2fperformance-and-obiee-test-design%2f&id=ma-141108035432-1b6c76d1http://pdfcrowd.com/customize/http://pdfcrowd.com/html-to-pdf-api/?ref=pdfhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instrumentation_(computer_programming)?__hstc=150481449.d7849fee6016a5a848dcb7fe793f739e.1415436870818.1415436870818.1415436870818.1&__hssc=150481449.1.1415436870818&__hsfp=1770896186http://www.scaleabilities.co.uk/2011/09/16/right-practice/?__hstc=150481449.d7849fee6016a5a848dcb7fe793f739e.1415436870818.1415436870818.1415436870818.1&__hssc=150481449.1.1415436870818&__hsfp=1770896186http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/british/yea-or-nay?__hstc=150481449.d7849fee6016a5a848dcb7fe793f739e.1415436870818.1415436870818.1415436870818.1&__hssc=150481449.1.1415436870818&__hsfp=1770896186http://www.rittmanmead.com/2013/03/performance-and-obiee-analysing-results#additionaldiagnosistipshttp://docs.oracle.com/cd/E11882_01/server.112/e17120/dbrm.htm?__hstc=150481449.d7849fee6016a5a848dcb7fe793f739e.1415436870818.1415436870818.1415436870818.1&__hssc=150481449.1.1415436870818&__hsfp=1770896186


11/13

df di b PRO i A d l ? T t th HTML t PDF API

could be given greater resource s ince the effect has been quantified and analysed in advance, whilst ad hoc or unproven

reports could be more res tricted.

To implement this, pass through the report or user name through in the connection pool, and then define a Resource

Manager rule to ass ign the resource m anagement policy accordingly.

Resources can also be controlled at the BI Server level by setting restrictions on query runtimes and rows returned on a per-

application role basis.

What next?Now that weve definedthe test we want to perform, and have designed how it will be implemented, we move onto actually

building it, here

Other articles in this seriesThis article is part of a series on the subject of Performance and OBIEE:

1. Introduction

2. Test Define3. Test Design4. Test Build5. Execute6. Analyse7. Optimise8. Summary and FAQ

Comments?Id love yourfeedback. Do you agree wi th this method, or is it a waste of time? What have I overlooked or overemphas ised?

Am I flogging a dead horse?

Because there are several articles in this s eries, and Id like to retain the discuss ion in one place, Ive enabled comm ents on

the summary and FAQpost here, and disabled comments on the others.

Related Posts:

Advanced Presentation Services settings for OBIEE testing & development

Performance and OBIEE part I Introduction
http://pdfcrowd.com/http://pdfcrowd.com/redirect/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.rittmanmead.com%2f2013%2f03%2fperformance-and-obiee-test-design%2f&id=ma-141108035432-1b6c76d1http://pdfcrowd.com/customize/http://pdfcrowd.com/html-to-pdf-api/?ref=pdfhttp://rnm1978.wordpress.com/2011/10/10/instrumenting-obiee-the-final-chapter/?__hstc=150481449.d7849fee6016a5a848dcb7fe793f739e.1415436870818.1415436870818.1415436870818.1&__hssc=150481449.1.1415436870818&__hsfp=1770896186http://www.rittmanmead.com/2013/03/performance-and-obiee-test-definehttp://www.rittmanmead.com/2013/03/performance-and-obiee-test-buildhttp://www.rittmanmead.com/2013/03/performance-and-obiee-introductionhttp://www.rittmanmead.com/2013/03/performance-and-obiee-test-definehttp://www.rittmanmead.com/2013/03/performance-and-obiee-test-designhttp://www.rittmanmead.com/2013/03/performance-and-obiee-test-buildhttp://www.rittmanmead.com/2013/03/performance-and-obiee-execute-and-measurehttp://www.rittmanmead.com/2013/03/performance-and-obiee-analysing-resultshttp://www.rittmanmead.com/2013/03/optimising-obiee-performance-tuninghttp://www.rittmanmead.com/2013/03/performance-and-obiee-summary-and-faqhttp://www.rittmanmead.com/2013/03/performance-and-obiee-summary-and-faqhttp://www.rittmanmead.com/2012/08/advanced-presentation-services-settings-for-obiee-testing-development/http://www.rittmanmead.com/2013/03/performance-and-obiee-introduction/http://www.rittmanmead.com/2013/03/performance-and-obiee-summary-and-faq/


12/13df di b PRO i A d l ? T t th HTML t PDF API

Tweet 2 0Like

Performance and OBIEE Summary and FAQ

Posted in Oracle BI Suite EE, Performance| Comments Off

Comments are closed.

Call us now to talk about your BI project:

+44 (0) 1273 911 268 (UK) or(888) 631-1410 (USA)

or+61 3 9596 7186 (Australia & New Zealand) or

+91 997 256 7970 (India)or+32 280 882 11 (Belgium)

Home

About Us> About us

> About our team

> Contact us

> Our clients

Services> Consulting

> Training

> Support

ConsultingServices> Projects

> Expert Services

> OBIEE 11g

> Sustainability

> On Discoverer?

> Oracle DW

Training> OBIEE

Bootcamp

> OBIEE End-User

> Exalytics

> ODI 11g

Bootcamp

> Oracle BI Apps

Resources> Articles

> Blog

> OBIEE 11g

Blog Authors> Mark Rittma n

> Venkat J

> Peter Scott

> Borkur S

> Mike Vic kers

> Robin Moffatt

> Jon Mead

Rittman Mead Consulting ltd.

Registered Office : Suite B,

First Floor Moore House,

13 Black Lion Street,

Brighton, East Sussex,

BN1 1ND, United Kingdom

Company No. : 6032852

VAT No. : 900 3839 48

Rittman Mead America, Inc.Registered Office : 4550 North Point Parkway

390 Alpharetta, Georgia 30022, USA

Rittman Mead Oceania Pty Ltd.

Registered Office : 12 Moore Street,

Brighton East,

Victoria, 3187, Australia

Austral ian Company No. : 1 49 458 9 35

Rittman Mead Consulting Pvt Ltd.

Registered Office : Unit 105-106

Share 2
http://pdfcrowd.com/redirect/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.rittmanmead.com%2f2013%2f03%2fperformance-and-obiee-test-design%2f&id=ma-141108035432-1b6c76d1http://pdfcrowd.com/redirect/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.rittmanmead.com%2f2013%2f03%2fperformance-and-obiee-test-design%2f&id=ma-141108035432-1b6c76d1http://pdfcrowd.com/redirect/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.rittmanmead.com%2f2013%2f03%2fperformance-and-obiee-test-design%2f&id=ma-141108035432-1b6c76d1http://pdfcrowd.com/redirect/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.rittmanmead.com%2f2013%2f03%2fperformance-and-obiee-test-design%2f&id=ma-141108035432-1b6c76d1http://pdfcrowd.com/http://pdfcrowd.com/redirect/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.rittmanmead.com%2f2013%2f03%2fperformance-and-obiee-test-design%2f&id=ma-141108035432-1b6c76d1http://pdfcrowd.com/customize/http://pdfcrowd.com/html-to-pdf-api/?ref=pdfhttps://twitter.com/intent/tweet?original_referer=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rittmanmead.com%2F2013%2F03%2Fperformance-and-obiee-test-design%2F&text=Performance%20and%20OBIEE%20%E2%80%93%20part%20III%20%E2%80%93%20Test%20%E2%80%93%20Design&tw_p=tweetbutton&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rittmanmead.com%2F2013%2F03%2Fperformance-and-obiee-test-design%2F&via=rittmanmeadhttp://twitter.com/search?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rittmanmead.com%2F2013%2F03%2Fperformance-and-obiee-test-design%2Fhttp://www.rittmanmead.com/2013/03/performance-and-obiee-summary-and-faq/http://www.rittmanmead.com/category/oracle-bi-suite-ee/http://www.rittmanmead.com/category/performance/http://www.rittmanmead.com/http://www.rittmanmead.com/about/http://www.rittmanmead.com/about/our-team/http://www.rittmanmead.com/about/contact-us/http://www.rittmanmead.com/clients/http://www.rittmanmead.com/consultinghttp://www.rittmanmead.com/traininghttp://www.rittmanmead.com/supporthttp://www.rittmanmead.com/consulting/expert-services/http://www.rittmanmead.com/consulting/expert-services/http://www.rittmanmead.com/consulting/obiee-11g-services/http://www.rittmanmead.com/consulting/prepare-build-and-sustain/http://www.rittmanmead.com/consulting/migrating-from-discoverer-to-oracle-bi-suite-enterprise-edition/http://www.rittmanmead.com/consulting/data-warehousing/http://www.rittmanmead.com/training/trn202-oracle-bi-ee-11g-bootcamp/http://www.rittmanmead.com/training/trn-205-oracle-bi-ee-11g-create-reports-dashboards-alerts-and-scorecards/http://www.rittmanmead.com/training/trn-701-exalytics-for-systems-administrators/http://www.rittmanmead.com/training/trn-403-odi-11g-bootcamp/http://www.rittmanmead.com/training/trn-40-oracle-bi-apps-bootcamp/http://www.rittmanmead.com/articleshttp://www.rittmanmead.com/bloghttp://www.rittmanmead.com/obiee11ghttp://www.rittmanmead.com/author/mark-rittman/http://www.rittmanmead.com/author/venkatakrishnan-j/http://www.rittmanmead.com/author/peter-scott/http://www.rittmanmead.com/author/borkur-steingrimsson/http://www.rittmanmead.com/author/mike-vickers/http://www.rittmanmead.com/author/robin-moffatt/http://www.rittmanmead.com/author/jon-mead/


13/13df di b PRO i

Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

Website Design & Build: tymedia.co.uk

Regent Prime

Whitefield Main Road

Whitefield

Bangalore

560066

Rittman Mead Belgium

Registered Office : Chausse de Louvain 426

1380 Lasne

Belgium

2010-2011 Rittm an Mead Cons ulting. | Privacy Policy | E: info@rittm anmead.com
http://pdfcrowd.com/http://pdfcrowd.com/redirect/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.rittmanmead.com%2f2013%2f03%2fperformance-and-obiee-test-design%2f&id=ma-141108035432-1b6c76d1http://pdfcrowd.com/customize/http://pdfcrowd.com/html-to-pdf-api/?ref=pdfhttp://www.tymedia.co.uk/?__hstc=150481449.d7849fee6016a5a848dcb7fe793f739e.1415436870818.1415436870818.1415436870818.1&__hssc=150481449.1.1415436870818&__hsfp=1770896186http://www.rittmanmead.com/privacy-policy/mailto:[email protected]

www rittmanmead com 2013 03 performance and obiee test desig

Documents