pier
TRANSCRIPT
Detailed Engineering Design of Chargahawa River Bridge Design Calculation VOLUMN-III
4.0 Design of Pier4.1 Design Data:
Concrete: M20
Reinforcement: Fe415
Basic Permissible Stresses of Concrete as per IRC : 21-2000:
Permissible direct compressive stress, σco = 5.0 N/mm2
Permissible flexural compressive stress, σc = 6.67 N/mm2
Maximum Permissible shear stress, τmax = 1.8 N/mm2
Basic Permissible tensile stress, σt = 0.53 N/mm2
Basic Permissible Stresses of Reinforcing Bars as per IRC : 21-2000:
Permissible Flexural Tensile stress, σst = 200 Mpa
Permissible direct compressive stress, σco = 170 MPa
20
Design of Data:
Modular Ratio, m = 10
Neutral axis depth factor, n = (mσc)/( mσc+σst) = 0.250
Lever arm factor, j = (1-n/3) = 0.917
Moment of resistance coefficient, R= ½ x n x j x σc = 0.765
Unit weight of materials as per IRC : 6-2000:
Concrete (cement-Reinforced) = 2.4 t/m3
Macadam (binder premix) = 2.2 t/m3
Water = 1.0 t/m3
Backfill = 1.6 t/m3
4.2 Geometrical Properties:center to center Span of bearing 18.00 mTotal span length 18.6 mHFL = 1002.15 mLBL = 997.00 mMax. scor depth below HFL = 3.28 mDepth of Superstructure = 1.4 mDepth of Bearing & pad = 0.05 mAve. Velocity of water current = 2.2 m/secPier shape, semi-circular, = 0.66 mRL of max scour lev. = 998.87 mFree board = 0.9 mRL of Pier Cap required = 1003.05 mRL of Pier Cap provided = 1003.05 mRL of foundation top = 997.50 mHt. of HFL from base of pier = 4.65 mHt. upto deck from GL = 7.50 mSize of bearing l = 400 b = 250 mmExpansion joit = 40 mmC/C distance between girder = 2.4 mDiameter of pier, b1 = 1.2 mNumber of pier, n = 3Width of pier cap, b3 = 1.6 m
Unique Engineering Consultancy (P) Ltd Page 1
Generated by Foxit PDF Creator © Foxit Softwarehttp://www.foxitsoftware.com For evaluation only.
Detailed Engineering Design of Chargahawa River Bridge Design Calculation VOLUMN-III
Length of pier cap,b4 = 6.6 mb5 = 0.64 mb6 = 0.9 mh1 = 4.80 m
Pier cap Thickness,h2 = 0.75 mh3 = 0.05 m
Calculations of loads and Moments
Due to dead LoadDead load from superstructure = 162.16 tSelf wt. of bearing & expansion joint = 9.01 tTotal DL from superstructure = 171.17 tSelf wt. of pierwt. of pier shaft = 39.09 twt.of pier cap = 19.01 tTotal DL at pier base = 229.27 t
Due to LL Load - unequal loadingClass A wheel loading in longitudinal directionFor maximum load on pier, the arrangement of IRC class A loading will be as shown below:
Max. LL on pier from right side = 2(11.4*20+11.4*18.8+6.8*14.5+6.8*11.5+6.8*9.5+6.8*5.5)/20= 69.01 t
impact factor = 1.188Max LL including Impact = 81.95 tLL / m length of pier = 68.29LL from left side = 2(2.7*17.44+2.7*16.34)/18
= 10.13LL including Impact = 12.03 tLL / m length of pier = 10.03 t
Moment due to unequal loading of LL 22.37 t-mIn transverse directionMax. LL including impact = 93.99 tEccentricity = 0.25 mMoment due to LL = 23.50 t-m
Class AA Track loading in longitudinal direction
Max. LL on pier = 62.13 timpact factor = 1.100Max LL including Impact = 68.34 tLL / m length of pier = 62.13
Moment due to unequal loading of LL 21.87 t-mIn transverse directionEccentricity = 0.35 mMoment due to LL = 23.92 t-m
Due to longitudinal Forces
11.4 11.4 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.82.72.7
PLAN
Unique Engineering Consultancy (P) Ltd Page 2
Generated by Foxit PDF Creator © Foxit Softwarehttp://www.foxitsoftware.com For evaluation only.
Detailed Engineering Design of Chargahawa River Bridge Design Calculation VOLUMN-III
Due to tractive effort or braking = 14 tThis act at = 1.2 m above deck levelor at a distance from base of pier = 6.75 mMoment due to longitudinal force = 94.5 t-m
Due to resistance in bearing due to temperature
Maximum temperature variation, T = 25oC
Coefficient of thermal expansion, α = 1.17E-05 /m/oCMax. Elongation , δ = 4.68 mmShear Mdulus of bearing material, G = 1.00 MpaDepth of bearing = 50.00 mmLongitudinal force / bearing = 0.936 tThe total resistance offered by bearing = = 2.808 tUnbalanced force at the bearing = 2.81 tThis force acts at the bearing level, i.e. at a distance from pier base = 7.40 m
Total longitudinal force due to Breaking & temperature 16.81 tMoment due to longitudinal force = 158.68 t-mMoment due to temperature on DL only = 20.78 t-m
Due to water currentFor pier parrallel to direction of water current, the intensity of pressure is given by
Ic = 52KV2where, K = 0.66 a constant depending on the geometry of pier
V = 2.2 velocity of current in m/secIc = 166.11 kg/m2
Height of HFL from base of pier = 4.65 mWidth of pier at HFL = 1.1 ma.) water current force parallel to the pier = 1.19 t
And corresponding moment = 3.86 t-mb.) Water current varying at 20 degree
Intensity parallel to the pier = 156.09 kg/m2Intensity perpendicular to the pier = 56.81 kg/m2Force parallel to the pier 1.12 tForce perpendicular to the pier 0.41 tMoment parallel to the pier 3.63 t-mMoment perpendicular to the pier 1.32 t-m
Due to wind forceThe area of superstructure in elevation providing 25% for railing = 31.13 m2a. height upto deck level from ground level = 7.20 mWind pressure at that height (refer. IRC:6-2000), P = 86 kg/m2Wind force on superstructure = 2.68 tWind force against moving load 20.4 m long corresponding to IRC class A @ 300 kg/m
= 6.12 tTotal wind force = 8.80 tb. Minimum force on deck at 450 kg/m 7.47 tc. Minimum force with wind pressure of 225 kg/linear m in the plane of unloaded structure
7.00 tWind force to be considered = maximum of (a,b,c) = 8.89 tMoment parallel to pier due to wind force acting at 1.5m above deck = 64.02 t-mDue to BuoyancyForce due to buoyancy on the pier shaft = 15.78 tDue to seismic forcesA. Along longitudinal direction
Description162.16 6.2519.01 5.17539.09 2.4
Total Load (t) Seismic Load(t) Lever arm (m) Moment (t-m)Superstructure DL 16.22 101.35Pier cap 1.90 9.84Pier Shaft 3.91 9.38
Unique Engineering Consultancy (P) Ltd Page 3
Generated by Foxit PDF Creator © Foxit Softwarehttp://www.foxitsoftware.com For evaluation only.
Detailed Engineering Design of Chargahawa River Bridge Design Calculation VOLUMN-III
220.26
B. Along Transverse directionMoment due to dead load is taken to be same as that in longitudinal direction. In addition, seismicforces and moments on LL including impact must be considered for transverse condition.
Total LL on pier = 93.99 tSeismic force due to LL = 9.40 tLever arm = 8.15 m
Moment due to seismic force on LL = 76.60 t-m
Total Seismic force = 31.42 tTotal Moment due to seismic force = 197.2 t-m
Summary of Loads and Moments
Long. Tran. Long.220.2693.99 23.92 21.87
16.81 158.68
1.12 0.41 3.63 1.328.89 64.02
15.7831.42 22.03 197.17 120.6
The forces and moments due to seismicity are grater than those due to wind forces. As per standard design practce, seismic forces and moments will be adopted neglecting the effect due to wind forces.
Design of pier shaft sectionThe pier section will be designed for the Case A and the section adequacy will be checked for both thecases. As the moment of inertia of the pier along Y-Y axis is greater than along X-X axis, the designneeds to be done for stresses along the X-X axis only.
Design vertical load = 104.75 tDesign Moment = 60.62 t-mEccentricity = 0.58 m
Diameter of the pier shaft, D = 1.2 mEffective diameter, d = 1109 mm
Check for position of eccentricity D/4<e<1.5D0.28 < 0.58 < 1.80 O.K.
Length of pier, L = 5.55 mEffective length of column, le =1.2xL = 6.66 mRadius of gyration, r = 0.3 mRatio of effective length to radius of gyration = 22.2 > 12
< 50 Short columnMinimum area of steel = 0.8 %Maximum area of steel = 8 %Assume percentage area of steel = 1 %Modular ratio. α = 10Section modulus, W = 0.131 m3Gross area of concrete, Ag = 0.950 m2Net area of concrete, Ac = 0.941 m2
degree skiew
Total 22.03 120.57
Description Vertical LoadHorizontal Force (t) Moment (t-m)
Tran.DL (Superstr.+pier)LL (Unequal loading)Longitudinal force(Braking+Temp)Water current at 20
Wind forcesBuoyancySeismic forces
Case A: DL+LL+LF+WC
Moment (t-m) 160.00 302.44181.87
C: Case A + SFVertical load (t) 204.48 314.25Horizontal Load (t) 17.21 39.24
B: DL+LF+WC+B314.2517.21
Unique Engineering Consultancy (P) Ltd Page 4
Generated by Foxit PDF Creator © Foxit Softwarehttp://www.foxitsoftware.com For evaluation only.
Detailed Engineering Design of Chargahawa River Bridge Design Calculation VOLUMN-III
X-sectional area of steel, Asc = 9503 mm2
Therefore, direct stress, σco,cal = 0.98 N/mm2
Bending compressive stress, σc, cal = 4.61 N/mm2
Checki) Combined stress = 0.89 < 1.0 O.K.
ii) Resultant tension, σt, cal = 3.64 N/mm2 > 0.53 N/mm2
iii) Resultant compressive stress = 5.59 N/mm2 < 6.67 O.K.iv) Tensile stress in steel = 36.36 N/mm2 < 200 O.K.Provide 20 numbers 25 mm diameter bars giving area of steel= 9817 mm2Spacing of bars = 158 mm O.K.
Design for lateral tie:
Diameter of lateral tie >φL/4 = 6.25 mm
> 8 mmPitch of lateral tie < least lateral dimension of column = 1009 mm
< 12x dia of smallest longitudinal bar = 300 mmProvide 10 mm dia lateral tie @ 150 mm c/c with cross links.
Check for stresses in concrete and steel for case BDesign vertical load = 65.65 tDesign Moment = 53.33 t-mEccentricity = 0.81 m
Diameter of the pier shaft, D = 1.1 mEffective diameter, d = 1009 mm
Check for position of eccentricity D/4<e<1.5D0.28 < 0.81 < 1.65 O.K.
Therefore, direct stress, σco,cal = 0.63 N/mm2
Bending compressive stress, σc, cal = 4.08 N/mm2
Checki) Combined stress = 0.74 < 1.0 O.K.
ii) Resultant tension, σt, cal = 3.45 N/mm2 > 0.53 N/mm2
iii) Resultant compressive stress = 4.71 N/mm2 < 6.67 O.K.iv) Tensile stress in steel = 34.54 N/mm2 < 200 O.K.
Check for stresses in concrete and steel for case CDesign vertical load = 101.67 tDesign Moment = 110.16 t-mEccentricity = 1.08 m
Diameter of the pier shaft, D = 1.1 mEffective diameter, d = 1009 mm
Check for position of eccentricity D/4<e<1.5D0.28 < 1.08 < 1.65 O.K.
Therefore, direct stress, σco,cal = 0.98 N/mm2
Bending compressive stress, σc, cal = 8.43 N/mm2
Checki) Combined stress = 0.97 < 1.0 O.K.
ii) Resultant tension, σt, cal = 7.45 N/mm2 > 0.80 N/mm2
=+c
c
c
c
σ
cal,σ
oσ
calo,σ
=+c
c
c
c
σ
cal,σ
oσ
calo,σ
=+c
c
c
c
σ
cal,σ
oσ
calo,σ
Unique Engineering Consultancy (P) Ltd Page 5
Generated by Foxit PDF Creator © Foxit Softwarehttp://www.foxitsoftware.com For evaluation only.
Detailed Engineering Design of Chargahawa River Bridge Design Calculation VOLUMN-III
iii) Resultant compressive stress = 9.41 N/mm2 < 10.01 O.K.iv) Tensile stress in steel = 74.49 N/mm2 < 300 O.K.
Design of pier cap:Calculations of loads and MomentsDue to dead LoadTotal DL from superstructure = 28.53 twt.of pier cap = 9.50 tTotal DL on pier = 38.03 tLoad from each girder = 20.82 t
Due to live LoadTotal live load including impact = 93.99 tLoad from each girder = 29.85 t
Design of pier capAs the bearings are placed centrally over the column and the width of bearing is located within half the depth of cap from any external face of the columns, the cap beam need not be designed for flexure.Min. area of steel required = 2212 mm2Provide 8 nos. of 25 mm φ bars giving area of steel = 3927 mm2at top and 8 nos. of 25 mm φ bars giving area of steel = 3927 mm2at bottom.Equivalent shear force = 50.67 tShear stress, tv = 0.47 N/mm2Percentage area of tension steel = 0.36 %Permissible shear strength of concrete, tc = 0.265 N/mm2Assuming 10 mm φ 8 legged vertical stirrups giving area of steel = 628 mm2Spacing of stirrups = 385 mm c/cProvide 10 mm φ 8 legged vertical stirrups @ 100 mm c/c.Provide 4 nos. 20 mm dia. Bars on each face as a side face bars.
As per IRC:78-2000, clause 710.10.4 the two layers of mesh reinforcement, one at 20 mm from top and the other at 100 mm from top of abutment cap each consisting of 8 mm φ bars @ 100 mm
c/c in both directions, shall be provided directly under the bearings.
Check for bearing stresses
The allowable bearing pressure with nearly uniform distribution on the loaded area of a footing or
base under a bearing or column shall be given by following equation,
C =
C0 = 5.00 MPa, permissible direct compressive stress in concrete
A1 = 1.776 m2, dispersed largest concentric area similar to A2
A2 = 0.356 m2, loaded area
Therefore, Α1/Α2 = 4.989 > 2
And, C = 7.07 Mpa
Actual compressive stress = 1.42 < C O.K.
2
10
A
AC ×
Unique Engineering Consultancy (P) Ltd Page 6
Generated by Foxit PDF Creator © Foxit Softwarehttp://www.foxitsoftware.com For evaluation only.
Detailed Engineering Design of Chargahawa River Bridge Design Calculation VOLUMN-III
Design of pier footing (Piles)Diameter of pier = 1.2 mLength of footing, L = 6.5 m along longitudinal directionWidth of footing, B = 6.5 m along transverse directionDepth of footing = 1.1 mBearing capacity of soil = 0 t/m2Load bearing capacity of pile = 40 tNumbers of piles along longitudinal dirrection = 4 mNumbers of piles along transverse dirrection = 4 mTotal numbers of piles = 16Diameter of piles = 700 mmLength of piles = 16 mSoil Type : Clayey Silt
Determination of depth of fixity of piles:
Unconfined compressive strength, S = 0.46 kg/cm2
Modulus of subgrade reaction, K = 13.2 kg/cm2
Therefore, Lf/d = 6 from figure 1 and 2.
and, depth of fixity,Lf = 4.2 m
Calculation of loadsself weight of footing = 111.54 tBuoyancy force on foundation base = 46.48 t
The forces and moments due to seismicity are grater than those due to wind forces. As per standard design practce, seismic forces and moments will be adopted neglecting the effect due to wind forces.
Horizontal Load (t) 17.21 17.21 38.76
Case A: DL+LL+LF+WC B: DL+LF+WC+B C: Case A + SFVertical load (t) 314.25 262.00 416.56
Moment (t-m) 180.91 160.00 330.49
Unique Engineering Consultancy (P) Ltd Page 7
Generated by Foxit PDF Creator © Foxit Softwarehttp://www.foxitsoftware.com For evaluation only.
Detailed Engineering Design of Chargahawa River Bridge Design Calculation VOLUMN-III
Case: A
Deducting the bearing capacity of pile cap as a open footing, vertical loads to be taken by piles
= 314.25 t
Loads on each pile due to vertical load = 19.64 t
Axial load on extreme pile due to moment = 7.80 t
Resultant compressive force = 27.44 t < 40.00 t O.K.
Resultant tensile force = 0.00 t < 40.00 t O.K.
Horizontal force on each piles = 1.08 t
Moment on each piles = 4.52 t-m
Design of piles:
Length of pile, L = 16 m
Diameter of pile, D = 0.7 m
L/D = 22.86 > 12 Hence the pile is designed as long column.
Least radious of gyration, r = 17.5 cm
Reduction coefficient for reduction of stress values is given as,
cr = (1.25-L/48B) = 0.774
Safe stress are,
Permissible direct compressive stress, σco = 3.87 N/mm2
Permissible flexural compressive stress, σco = 5.16 N/mm2
Permissible Flexural Tensile stress, σst = 154.762 Mpa (in steel)
Maximum compressive stress in concrete = 0.88 N/mm2 < 3.869 N/mm2
Provide minimum area of compression steel @ 1.25 %.
Asc = mm2
Provide 15 nos. Of 25 mm φ bars, giving area of steel = 7363 mm2
Check for combined stress:
Percentage area of steel provided, pt = 1.276
p/fck = 0.064
d'/D = 0.089
Pu/fckD2 = 0.052
From chart, Mu/fckD3 = 0.07
and Mu = 48.02 t-m
Working moment, M = 32.01 t-m > 4.52 t-m O.K.
Shear stress due to horizontal force = 0.03 N/mm2
Permissible shear strength of concrete = 0.45 N/mm2 O.K.
Case: C
Axial load on extreme pile due to moment = 14.25 t
Resultant compressive force = 40.28 t < 90.00 t O.K.
Resultant tensile force = 0.00 t < 90.00 t O.K.
Horizontal force on each piles = 2.42 t
Moment on each piles = 10.17 t-m
Pu/fckD2 = 0.062
From chart, Mu/fckD3 = 0.072
and Mu = 61.74 t-m
4811
Unique Engineering Consultancy (P) Ltd Page 8
Generated by Foxit PDF Creator © Foxit Softwarehttp://www.foxitsoftware.com For evaluation only.
Detailed Engineering Design of Chargahawa River Bridge Design Calculation VOLUMN-III
Working moment, M = 41.16 t-m > 10.17 t-m O.K.
Shear stress due to horizontal force = 0.06 N/mm2
Permissible shear strength of concrete = 0.56 N/mm2 O.K.
Lateral Reinforcement:
Lateral reinforcement should be 0.2% of the gross volume. Using dia. 10 mm ties,
we have the volume of one tie = 145577 mm3
If p be the pitch of the ties in mm, then
Volume of pile per pitch length = 384845.1 p
Hence equating, we get, p = 189 mm
Hence provide dia 10 mm ties at 160 mm c/c in the main body of the pile.
Design of Pile Cap:
Maximum bending moment in the pile cap due to vertical load,
At center of cap = 322.5 t-m
At face of column = 260.3 t-m
Bending moment due to moment on steam = 90.5 t-m
Maximum bending moment = 413.0 t-m
The effective depth required is given by,
dreq = 912 mm
Adopt 1030 mm effective depth and overall depth = 1100 mm
Area of steel required along width of cap = 21872 mm2
Using 25 mm dia. bars, spacing would be 146 mm
Provede 25 mm dia. Bars @ 110 mm c/c, provided area of steel = 29006
at both top and bottom.
Distribution reinforcement @ 0.12% = 8580 mm2
Provide 25 mm dia bars @ 150 mm c/c, giving area of stee = 21271 mm2.
Shear force = 263.94 t
Shear stress, tv = 0.39 N/mm2
Percentage area of steel, pt = 0.43 %
Permissible shear strength of concrete, tc = 0.278 N/mm2 < tv O.K.
Shear reinforement to be designed..
Assuming 10 mm dia 20 legged vertical tirrups, then Asv = 1571 mm2
And spacing of stirrups, S = 416 mm
Maximum spacing of stirrups, = 218 mm
Provide 10 mm dia 20 legged vertical tirrups @ 160 mm c/c.
Check for punching shear along pier,
Shear force = 101.67 t
bo = 6692 mm
tv = 0.15 N/mm2
Punching shear strength, tc = 0.716 N/mm2 > tv Safe.
Check for punching shear along pile,
Shear force = 33.83 t
bo = 5435 mm
tv = 0.06 N/mm2
Punching shear strength, tc = 0.716 N/mm2 > tv Safe.
Unique Engineering Consultancy (P) Ltd Page 9
Generated by Foxit PDF Creator © Foxit Softwarehttp://www.foxitsoftware.com For evaluation only.