document

22
Core Issues in Comparative Politics (PO233) Module Director: Dr. Renske Doorenspleet Associate Professor in Comparative Politics director Centre for Studies in Democratization Department of Politics and International Studies University of Warwick, UK www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/pais/staff/ doorenspleet/ www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/pais/research/csd/ e-mail: [email protected]

Upload: ashton

Post on 14-Jan-2016

28 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Core Issues in Comparative Politics (PO233) Module Director: Dr. Renske Doorenspleet Associate Professor in Comparative Politics director Centre for Studies in Democratization Department of Politics and International Studies University of Warwick, UK. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Document

Core Issues in Comparative Politics(PO233)

Module Director: Dr. Renske DoorenspleetAssociate Professor in Comparative Politics

director Centre for Studies in DemocratizationDepartment of Politics and International Studies

University of Warwick, UK

www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/pais/staff/doorenspleet/www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/pais/research/csd/

e-mail: [email protected]

Page 2: Document

Types of DemocraciesConsensus versus Majoritarian Systems(Lijphart 1999, see also week 11):

Executive-parties dimension (how easy is it for one party to take control of the government?)

1. concentration of executive power (week 14)2. dominance of executive (week 14)3. two-party vs. multiparty system (week 12)4. majoritarian electoral rules vs. PR (week 13)5. types of interest groups

Federal-unitary dimension

Page 3: Document

Content Lecture week 13Electoral Systems

A. Types of Electoral Systems (read Gallagher 2008; Hague and Harrop 2007, Ch. 10!)

B. Link Electoral and Party SystemsC. Back to Lijphart (read literature week 11)

D. Contents of seminar week 14

Page 4: Document

A. Types of Electoral Systems

Elections and referendums: the two main voting opportunities in democracies

Elections: people’s participation, link between people and their representatives, legitimation

Referendums… see Gallagher 2008: 250-259!

Focus in this lecture: elections electoral systems

Page 5: Document

A. Types of Electoral Systems

dimensions of electoral regulations:

- Extent of franchise (see also week 3, 4, 5)

- Voluntary or compulsory voting (see Hague and Harrop 2007: 202; Gallagher 2008: 243)

- Terms: Presidential versus Parliamentarian Systems (see also week 14)

Page 6: Document

A. Types of Electoral Systems

electoral system: the set of rules governing the conversion of votes into seats

impact on a country’s party-system, government-coalition, representation etc.

Electoral systems can be categorized along the magnitude of the constituencies:

Multi-member constituencies (PR-systems) ‘proportionality’ is key!

Single-member constituencies (Majoritarian- or non PR-systems) ‘winner takes all’ is key!

Page 7: Document

A. Types of Electoral Systems

Three main categories of PR-systems:

(1) List systems: The party presents a list of candidates. Voter votes for party (sometimes for candidates on party list)

Methods to award seats in list PR-systems:Perfect proportionality means (%) of votes = (%) of seats

Page 8: Document

A. Types of Electoral Systems

List systems: in 70 countries including Brazil, Israel and the Netherlands

Page 9: Document

A. Types of Electoral Systems

Three main categories of PR-systems:

(2) Mixed systems: Voter has two votes, one for a candidate and another for the party-list. But… in the end: PR!

Page 10: Document

A. Types of Electoral Systems

Mixed systems: in nine countries, including Germany and New Zealand

Page 11: Document

A. Types of Electoral Systems

Three main categories of PR-systems:

(3) Single transferable vote: Application of alternative vote to PR-systems. Extremely complicated! Used in Malta and Ireland

Page 12: Document

A. Types of Electoral Systems

Three main categories of non PR-systems (majoritarian and plurality systems):

1. Single-member plurality (First past the post): The candidate with the most votes is elected, majority not needed, within single-member districts.

Page 13: Document

A. Types of Electoral Systems

Single-member plurality: in 47 countries, including Canada, India, UK and USA

Page 14: Document

A. Types of Electoral Systems

Three main categories of non PR-systems (majoritarian and plurality systems):

2. Alternative vote: Rank order of candidates. The lowest placed candidate is eliminated and his votes are redistributed to second preference. The process is repeated until one candidate gets the majority.

Page 15: Document

A. Types of Electoral Systems

Alternative vote in Australia, Fiji, Papua New Guinea

Page 16: Document

A. Types of Electoral Systems

Three main categories of non PR-systems (majoritarian and plurality systems):

3. Two-round systems: If no candidate reaches the majority in the first round, the least successful candidates are eliminated and a second round takes place

Used in 22 countries, including Egypt, Mali and Vietnam

Page 17: Document

A. Types of Electoral SystemsElectoral systems vary in the following dimensions:

(1) District magnitude:From single-member constituencies to whole-country

constituenciesThe bigger the constituency the more proportional

Page 18: Document

A. Types of Electoral SystemsElectoral systems vary in the following dimensions (continued)

(2) Intra-party choice: How much intra-party choice is there among candidates?Single-member constituencies: No choice PR-systems:

Closed lists: Party determines order of candidatesPreferential lists: Voters can express their preference

Page 19: Document

A. Types of Electoral SystemsElectoral systems vary in the following dimensions (continued)

(3) Thresholds:Electoral systems often contain some institutions to prevent very small parties from winning seats:Preventing fragmentationFacilitating stable government

Thresholds are normally between 3-5% (Netherlands 0.67%,Russia 7%). Thresholds usually exist at national level, rarely at

constituency level.

Page 20: Document

B. Link Electoral and Party Systems

Link Electoral and Party Systems:

1. Duverger (1954): electoral system party system

versus

2. Rokkan (1970): social cleavages party system electoral system

And Jasiewicz (2003): political fragmentation adoption PR (not other way around, cf post-communist Europe)

And Miller (2005): cracks in two-party system BEFORE adoption of PR (based on New Zealand’s introduction of PR in 1996)

Page 21: Document

C. Back to LijphartLijphart’s executive-parties dimension (how easy is it for one party to take control of the government?): Fourth element: types of electoral systems

According to Lijphart, most important indicator of different types of political systems, to distinguish consensus and majoritarian systems

Problem of dichotomy, again!

Strong link with types of party systems (week 12)

Page 22: Document

D. Contents of Seminar week 14Homework seminar week 14:

1) Read the required literature of week 13

2) Choose one country and describe the following:- Types of electoral system over time- Why has the system been changed?- Advantages and disadvantages of the change/ different systemsSee www.electionworld.org/ and www.ipu.org/ and

https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/ and links in module outline

Prepare a presentation (around 5 minutes)