xin-nian wang ccnu/lbnl - brookhaven national laboratoryxin-nian wang ccnu/lbnl ags/rhic users...
TRANSCRIPT
Polarization of fermions in a vortiular fluid
Xin-Nian Wang CCNU/LBNL
AGS/RHIC Users meeting June 7, 2016
Fang, Pang, Wang & XNW arXiv:1604.04036 Pang, Petersen, Wang & XNW arXiv:1605.04024
Global Orbital Angular Momentum
Large v1 at large rapidity
Transverse gradient of longitudinal fluid velocity in a Landau fireball
,P TpartdNdx
Distribution of number of participant projectile or target nucleons
( , )2
( )
Ppart
Pp
Tpart
Tpartart
z
dNdxd
dsp x b
N
NdxdNdxx
sd
c
−=
⎛ ⎞+⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟
⎝ ⎠
Collective longitudinal momentum per produced parton
x
z b
Momentum conservation à BJ scaling violation
Local Orbital Angular Momentum
zz
dpp xdx
Δ = Δ
2 zy z
dpL x p xdx
= −Δ Δ = −Δ
Δx GeV/fm68.0/2 0 ≈ARp
GeVscsp 22.2)(2/0 ≈=
~! = ~r⇥ ~v ⇠ �yh 1E
dpz
dx
i
Quark Polarization
2 202 2 2 4 ( )T s T
T T T
d d d C K xd x d x d xσ σ σ
α µ+ −= + =
2 ( )qq
pPE E m
σ µπ
σΔ
≡ = −+
Unpolarized cross section:
dΔσd 2xT
=dσ
+
d 2xT−dσ
−
d 2xT= −µ
!p ⋅ ( xT ×!n)
E(E +mq )4CTαs
2K0 (µxT )K1(µxT )
Polarized cross section:
xT
p
n
pf
Liang & XNW, PRL 94 (2005) 102301
2 22
2 2 2 2 2,
1 1 ( )(2 ) 2 ( )
i
TT T
d gM q Cd q qλ λ
σπ µ
= =+∑
spin polarization in A+A
Spin-orbital coupling
nonrelativistic limit: (mq ≫ p,µ)
Pq ≈ −πµ p4mq
2
4 ( )qq
pPE E m
σ µπ
σΔ
≡ = −+
xT
p
n
pf
Liang & XNW, PRL 94 (2005) 102301
⇠ �!/m
Transverse momentum dependence
Pf = Pi �(1� P 2
i )⇡µp
2E(E +m)� Pi⇡µp
Huang, Pasi & XNW PRC 84 (2011) 054910
Pf (qT ) =⇡E(E +m)Pi � p
pq2T + µ2K(qT /
pq2T + µ2)
⇡E(E +m)� Pipp
q2T + µ2K(qT /pq2T + µ2)
Polarization rate Eq.
Consequences in A+A collisions
Globally Polarized thermal dilepton, J/Ψ, Hyperons and vector mesons
Liang & XNW, PRL 94 (05) 102301 Liang & XNW, PLB 629(05)20 Gao et al, PRC 77 (08) 044902
Spin polarization in equilibrium
Becattini & Ferroni, EJPC 52 (2007) 597, Betz, Gyulassy & Torrieri, PRC 76 (2007) 044901, Becattini, Piccinini & Rizzo, PRC 77 (2008) 024906, Beccatini, Csernai & Wang, PRC 87 (2013) 034905, Xie, Glastad & Csernai, PRC 92 (2015) 064901, Deng & Huang, arXiv 1603.06117
Spin: vorticity coupling
Dirac Eq.
Magnetic coupling
�Es =~2n · !
[�µ(i@µ + eqAµ)�m] (x) = 0
eq~n ·BEp
+
⇡Z
d3p
(2⇡)3�Es
@f(Ep)
@Ep
⇧ =1
2
Zd3p
(2⇡)3[f(Ep + �Es)� f(Ep + �Es)]
gradient expansion
CME/CVE and spin polarization
R (L) fermion’s spin parallel (opposite) to vorticity & magnetic field
Pu, Gao, Liang, Wang & XNW, PRL 109 (2012) 232301
Kharzeev, McLerran, Warringa (2008), Fukushima, Kharzeev, Warringa (2008)
Chiral Magnetic Effect Chiral Vorticity Effect Son, Surowka (2009), Kharzeev, Son (2011)
Quantum Kinetic Theory
Polarization density
+
µ chemical potential Polarization on the freeze-out surface:
~
Fang, Pang, Wang, XNW arXiv:1604.04036
Vorticity induced polarization per fermion
0
5
10
bEp
01
23
4
bm
0.0
0.1
0.2Pêr
0
5
10
bEp0
12
34
bm
0.0
0.1
0.2
Pêr
In the unit of !
fermion
anti-fermion
polarization fermion/anti-fermion
0
5
10
bEp
01
23
4
bm
0.0
0.5
1.0
R
R =[⇧/⇢]
fermion
[⇧/⇢]anti�fermion
Fang, Pang, Wang, XNW arXiv:1604.04036
Transverse gradient of longitudinal fluid velocity in the HIJING model
Approximate BJ scaling at y=0, no transverse gradient in longitudinal fluid velocity, BJ scaling violation at large y or lower collision energy
Gao, Chen, Deng, Liang, Q. Wang, XNW, PRC 77 (2008)044902
!y ⇠ sinh(Y )@Y
@x
Vorticity from HIJING model
Deng & Huang, arXiv:1603.06117
Global vorticity increases with impact-parameter and decreasing colliding energy
Features of Global Hyperon Polarization
• Hyperons & anti-hyperons are similarly polarized • PH=0 in central and increases with b • Increases with y at fixed collision energy • Increase at lower energy at fixed y
Talk by M. Lisa Workshop on Vorticity & magnetic field in heavy-ion collisions @UCLA, 2016
Transverse vorticity: Toroidal structure
Toroidal structure of transverse fluid vorticity, in addition to the global net vorticity
x
Pang, Petersen, Wang & XNW, arXiv:1605.04024
(vx
, v⌘
)
Transverse spin correlation
Pb + Pb @ 2.76 TeV (20-30%)
Pang, Petersen, Wang & XNW, arXiv:1605.04024
Transverse spin correlation
Pang, Petersen, Wang & XNW, arXiv:1605.04024
Longitudinal vorticity: vortex-pairing
Vortex Pairing
Pang, Petersen, Wang & XNW, arXiv:1605.04024
~v?
Longitudinal spin correlation
Pb + Pb @ 2.76 TeV (20-30%)
Pang, Petersen, Wang & XNW arXiv:1605.04024 ,
Longitudinal spin correlation
Pang, Petersen, Wang & XNW, arXiv:1605.04024
Summary
• fluid velocity gradient or fluid vorticity leads to global spin polarization
• Spin structure in QGP in A+A collisions – Hyperon polarization, vector meson spin alignment,
contribution to vn (small) • Convective longitudinal flow induces toroidal structure
of transverse vorticity à transverse spin-spin correlation
• Convective radial flow of hot spots induces longitudinal vortex-pairing à longitudinal spin-spin correlation
• Study of spin polarization can shed light on transport properties of QGP and hadronization mechanism
Longitudinal structure in A+A
E-by-E 3+1D ideal hydro + HIJING initial condition
Pang & XNW (2013)
Longitudinal decorrelation of vn
Fluctuation and twist of the event plane
Pang, Petersen, Qin, Roy & XNW, EPJA 52(06) 97
Vorticity in convective fluid
Constraints via v2
2 000 ( 1/ 3)v ρ< >
200 001 (3 1)cos
cosdNd
ρ ρ θθ= − + −
2 000 ( 1/ 3)v ρ> <
pT
pT
Spin Alignment of Vector Mesons
00
1 13 3
q q
q q
P PP P
ρ−
= ≤+ 11
(1 )(1 )3q q
q q
P PP P
ρ+ +
=+1 1
(1 )(1 )3q q
q q
P PP P
ρ− −
− −=
+
Recombination model
2
00 2
1 13 3
q
q
PP
αρ
α
+= ≥
−
Fragmentation
First rank: q-bar anti-parallel to leading q 0e e Z qq Xρ+ − →→ → → +
Other effects
1( ) (( () () ) )2f fM u p kS q V qk u pπΛ
⎡ ⎤/ /= + +⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦
PΛ>0 PΛ<0 Hadronic scattering: Λ+π à Λ π
Quark polarization due to Chromo-magnetic field? (Kharzeev’04)
No global chromo-magnetic field ß color correlation length
L ~ rN inside nuclei, L ~ 1/µ in QGP
L ~ 1/Qs in CGC
Towards a numeric estimation at RHIC
0 0.34 GeV/fm2 ( ) A
dp sdx c s R
= ≈
0.1 GeV zp µΔ : =
“Small angle approximation” is NOT valid at RHIC.
( ) 45 at RHIC (assume parton/hadron=2)c s =
1 0.5 GeVx
µΔ
: :
Semi-central: b=RA
We need to go beyond small angle approximation
QK equation for massive fermions
Spin quantized in a given direction n in the fermion’s rest frame
Fang, Pang, Wang, XNW arXiv:1604.04036
Quantum Kinetic approach to CME/CVE and spin polarization
Pu, Gao, Liang, Wang & XNW, PRL 109 (2012) 232301
Wignar function:
Quantum Kinetic equation
Gradient expansion:
Quark Scattering with fixed Ly
M λ ,λi(!qT ) =
−ig2Euλ ( pf ) /A(qT )uλi ( p)
02 2
1( )TT
A qq µ
=+
Screened static potential model With small angle approximation: qT<<p
Iλ !g 2
2A0 (qT )A
0 (kT ) 1− iλ(!qT −
!kT ) ⋅ (
!n × !p)2E(E +mq )
⎡
⎣⎢⎢
⎤
⎦⎥⎥
: final quark spin λ
xT
p
n
pf
dσλ
d 2xT=CT
d 2qT(2π )2∫
d 2kT(2π )2
ei (!kT −!qT )i!xT 12
M λ ,λi(!qT )
λi
∑ M λ ,λi
† (!kT )
Polarization in unpolarized collisions
Transverse polarized hyperons in unpolarized p+p, p+A collisions.
p Λ
1 (1 cos )cos 2dN Pd
α θθ Λ= + θ : angle of decay products
in rest fame relative to the polarization direction αpπ-=0.642
Hyperon Polarization in p+p, p+A
• PΛ,,PΞ, Panti-Ξ, <0, PΣ , Panti-Σ >0.
• P=0 for anti-Λ, Ω and anti-Ω. • increase with xf and pT
• Weak A-dependence in p+A collisions. • Measured in A+A at AGS: vanishes
p
h
Connection to single-spin asymmetry and spin-orbital angular momentum coupling
φ
Constituent Quark Recombination
PΛ= Ps P
Σ=4Pq − Ps −3PsPq
2
3− 4PqPs + Pq2
PΞ=4Ps − Pq −3PqPs
2
3− 4PqPs + Ps2
2
2
53(1 )
ss
s
PP PPΩ
+=
+
Polarization of quarks
Polarization of hyperons: ( )( )( )
0
0
1/ 2
1/ 6 2
1/ 6 2
u d u d s
s s u s s s s u
u d s u d u d s
↑ ↑ ↓ ↓ ↑ ↑
↑ ↑ ↑ ↓ ↑ ↓ ↓ ↑ ↑
↑ ↑ ↑ ↓ ↑ ↓ ↓ ↑ ↑
Λ = −
⎡ ⎤Ξ = − +⎣ ⎦
⎡ ⎤Σ = − +⎣ ⎦
Constituent quark model:
(l=0, color anti-symmetric)
Fragmentation Scenario
Λ
φq
0e e Z qq X+ − →→ → →Λ +
Model: Only first rank hadron (containing q with the same initial polarization) is polarized
2s
ss s
nP Pn fΛ = + ( ) 14
3( 2 )s q s ss s
P f P n Pn fΣ = −+
( ) 143(2 )s s q q
s s
P n P f Pn fΞ = −+
/ 3sP PΩ =
ns, fs strange quark abundance relative to u, d in QGP and fragmentation