© RP Marine Surveys Ltd / ‘XXX’/ Sealine SC35 / 21st May 2013 / Page 1 of 17

GENERAL CONDITION SURVEY

XXXX

SEALINE SC35

RP Marine Ltd - Smugglers Barn - Norton - Dartmouth - Devon - TQ6 0NF

T. 01803 832098

E. roger@rpmarinesurveys.co.uk W. www.rpmainesurveys.co.uk

RP Marine Surveys is the trading name of RP Marine Ltd - Company Registered in England No. 7144265

© RP Marine Surveys Ltd / ‘XXX’/ Sealine SC35 / 21st May 2013 / Page 2 of 17

TABLE OF CONTENTS

GENERAL ......................................................................................................................................... - 3 -

1. CRAFT DATA ........................................................................................................................... - 3 - 2. APPROXIMATE SPECIFICATIONS .............................................................................................. - 3 - 3. PURPOSE AND LIMITATIONS OF SURVEY ................................................................................. - 3 - 4. DEFINITIONS OF RECOMMENDATIONS ..................................................................................... - 4 -

SURVEY ............................................................................................................................................ - 4 -

5. HULL BELOW THE WATERLINE ............................................................................................... - 4 - 6. HULL ABOVE THE WATERLINE ................................................................................................ - 6 - 7. HULL STRUCTURE ................................................................................................................... - 6 - 8. SUPERSTRUCTURE & DECK ..................................................................................................... - 7 - 9. STEERING & CONTROLS .......................................................................................................... - 8 - 10. ENGINES & OUTDRIVES .......................................................................................................... - 8 - 11. SEA TRIAL .............................................................................................................................. - 9 - 12. FUEL SYSTEM ....................................................................................................................... - 10 - 13. OPENINGS, SEACOCKS, SKIN FITTINGS & PIPEWORK ............................................................ - 11 - 14. WASTE INSTALLATION .......................................................................................................... - 11 - 15. PORT LIGHTS, HATCHES, COVERS & DOORS ......................................................................... - 12 - 16. FRESH WATER SYSTEM ......................................................................................................... - 12 - 17. D.C. ELECTRICAL SYSTEM .................................................................................................... - 13 - 18. A.C. ELECTRICAL SYSTEM .................................................................................................... - 13 - 19. NAVIGATION EQUIPMENT ..................................................................................................... - 14 - 20. SAFETY EQUIPMENT ............................................................................................................. - 14 - 21. ANCHOR SYSTEMS & GROUND TACKLE ............................................................................... - 15 - 22. BILGE .................................................................................................................................... - 15 - 23. VENTILATION ........................................................................................................................ - 15 - 24. FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT .................................................................................................. - 16 - 25. GAS SYSTEM ......................................................................................................................... - 16 - 26. INTERIOR & DOMESTIC ......................................................................................................... - 16 -

CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................................ - 17 -

© RP Marine Surveys Ltd / ‘XXX’/ Sealine SC35 / 21st May 2013 / Page 3 of 17

GENERAL

1. CRAFT DATA

Make: Sealine

Model: SC35

Type: Sports Cruiser

Craft ID No. (CIN): GB-SIL35193E010

Build Year: 2010 (from CIN)

Model Year: 2010 (from CIN)

Builder/Designer: Sealine International Ltd

CE Marked: Plate Displayed in Cockpit (Cat B)

Hull Type/Material: Planning/GRP

Engines: 2 x Volvo Penta D4 260 hp Diesels

Drive: 2 x Volvo Duo Prop Stern Drives

2. APPROXIMATE SPECIFICATIONS

(These are derived from brokers spec’s, information published on the internet, old yachting publications, Bristow’s

Book of Yachts etc. – they should not be relied upon if any dimension is critical to the purchase e.g. depth

/length/weight)

Length overall: 11.10m / 36’ 5”

Beam: 3.77m / 12’ 4”

Height above waterline: 3.64m / 11’ 11”

Draft (stern drives down): 1.09m / 3’ 7”

Headroom: 1.93m / 6’ 4”

Fuel capacity: 2 x 375 ltr / 2 x 82.4 gal

Water capacity: 214 ltr / 47 gal

Weight (dry): 7,900kg / 7.8 tons

3. PURPOSE AND LIMITATIONS OF SURVEY

A survey was commissioned by XXXXXX to establish the general condition prior to

purchase. The craft was examined

Note that significant areas of the internal surfaces of the hull and deck remain unavailable for

detailed examination due to the normal presence of bonded liners, fixed deck head and side

linings, locker linings, upholstery trims, fastened down sole boards and other fixed elements

of the fit out and construction being in situ, including: engine, machinery, batteries, tanks,

wiring, pipe work and all normally installed equipment, which restricts access to the internal

surfaces of the hull and deck thereby preventing detailed examination in these areas. No

screwed down joinery or linings were opened up or dismantled and therefore such parts left

covered, unexposed or inaccessible were not inspected.

No specific documentation relating to the boat was examined. The engines and outdrives

condition were not covered by the survey and as advised, they were examined separately

qualified Volvo service agent.

This survey was carried out on the understanding that we are legally liable to our client

named above only and not to any subsequent holders of the report.

© RP Marine Surveys Ltd / ‘XXX’/ Sealine SC35 / 21st May 2013 / Page 4 of 17

4. DEFINITIONS OF RECOMMENDATIONS

(URG) Work should be immediately

(B) Work should be performed before use

(I) Investigate prior to purchase

(CON) Take into consideration as part of the purchase.

(ASP) As soon as practicable

(C) / (C+) Work to done at the end of season / after 2 seasons use.

(D) Work to be performed within 3 – 5 year

(NUA) Non-Urgent Advisory

(BP) Best Practise

(COS) Cosmetic only

(FYI) For Your Information

(RMA) Routine Maintenance Advice

SURVEY

5. HULL BELOW THE WATERLINE

The craft had a deep V hull shape. The hull construction was thought to be of hand laid mat

and woven rovings in a polyester resin. A precise specification for the structural lay-up was

not available at the time of the survey.

The underwater hull of the craft was inspected immediately after lifting. The hull was

examined whilst hanging in the slings. The craft was viewed from a distance at various

angles and no obvious signs were found of any major longitudinal or transverse deformation

or structural failure, which might indicate earlier serious damage. No evidence of hard

grounding was noted.

The hull was covered in an application of black antifouling paint, which was well adhered and

smooth in appearance. Both sides of the underwater hull were sighted; no evidence of

blistering was noted through the wet paint coatings.

Random sample areas of the antifouling coatings were removed in order to examine the

uncovered surfaces for defects and record moisture readings. The surfaces uncovered what

was considered to be the original white pigmented gel coat. No blisters, swellings, wicking or

crazing were found and the gel coat was smooth.

The hull was randomly but extensively sounded with a hammer and no obvious significant

structural de-lamination or voids introduced during lay-up was found. A hard resonance was

noted when sounding.

The hull was especially examined at the points where the bulkheads were fitted and no sign of

hard spots in these areas were noted by way of cracking showing through the drying painted

surface indicating that the shell was too thin or insufficiently supported.

© RP Marine Surveys Ltd / ‘XXX’/ Sealine SC35 / 21st May 2013 / Page 5 of 17

Moisture readings

The moisture content was checked on range 2, % H20 of a ‘Tramex Skipper Plus’ moisture

meter. By convention moisture meters are calibrated for timber and the readings are relative.

The meter calibration was checked at the survey with a ‘Tramex Tester’ giving satisfactory

results. Conditions for a test were considered not to be ideal due to the short time the craft had

been ashore and the below results would not be considered absolute as readings and were seen

to decrease over the hour or so that the craft was out of the water.

Temperature 15oC Hull Temp 14

oC Weather: Sunny

Starboard Side: Range 12– 17

Sample Size 20

Average Reading 16

Topsides Average 14

Port Side: Range 12– 17

Sample Size 20

Average Reading 16

Topsides Average 13

The transom was examined and found to have acceptable moisture readings with what was

thought likely to be plywood stiffening sections. Soundings were normal indicating no de-

lamination.

Interpretation

Generally readings of up to and including 14% are considered low. Readings up to and

including 18% are considered moderate/satisfactory. Readings above this indicate a possible

developing osmotic condition.

Conclusion

The moisture test results were good considering the short time that the craft was ashore. The

underwater hull is in good condition from the evidence gathered at survey.

Recommendations

It is generally accepted that the condition of a GRP craft’s hull benefits from being

lifted and laid up ashore at the end of each season (for 4 months) or when the craft is

not in commission. (FYI)

© RP Marine Surveys Ltd / ‘XXX’/ Sealine SC35 / 21st May 2013 / Page 6 of 17

6. HULL ABOVE THE WATERLINE

The hull’s topsides were thought to be the same construction as the underwater hull. The

topsides of the vessel were viewed from a distance at various angles and no obvious signs of

longitudinal or transverse deformation or structural failure, which might indicate earlier

serious damage or poor repairs, was observed. The hull was finished in what was considered

to be the original white gel coat. The topsides were of good appearance. The craft had

various very minor fender scuffs and minor scratches the details of each of these have been

excluded for clarity.

The hull’s sides were sounded and no voids or skin failures noted. The sides were randomly

tested for moisture ingress with a Tramex meter and readings were found to be generally low.

There was a minor dent to the rubbing strake noted on the starboard quarter. Generally

however there was no evidence of any flexing or cracking and the shell appeared sufficiently

supported.

Recommendations

None.

7. HULL STRUCTURE

The hull was strengthened by traditional glassed in stringers and transverse floors plus a

substantial glassed and bonded internal moulding which forms the stiffening and provides fit

out for the furniture moulding, engine bed and bulkhead support. Some of the internal hull

structure was inaccessible due to linings and joinery; however where accessible for

examination there were no serious crack fractures or failures noted.

No evidence of movement of bulkheads and structure was noted. With no significant

deformation of the hull noted externally it is considered that the structure is providing

adequate support for the shell.

Recommendations

None.

© RP Marine Surveys Ltd / ‘XXX’/ Sealine SC35 / 21st May 2013 / Page 7 of 17

8. SUPERSTRUCTURE & DECK

The superstructure was formed from a one piece GRP moulding, which was thought to be

cored on the horizontal planes for strength. The superstructure has a white pigmented non

slip gel coat moulding.

The GRP surfaces were sounded giving a good resonance. Moisture readings were low.

The hull to superstructure join was an overlapping flange, which was screwed and bonded.

This was covered with a plastic/stainless rubbing strake, which was examined to be good

condition. No obvious areas of structural separation or movement were noted. Internally the

joint was not generally accessible for inspection.

The deck fastenings and in particular the stainless cleats were examined to be in good

condition and thought to be of adequate size for the type of craft. The pulpit stanchion bases

were examined to be in good condition generally with no serious stress cracking noted on the

surrounding moulded toe rails.

Recommendations

None.

© RP Marine Surveys Ltd / ‘XXX’/ Sealine SC35 / 21st May 2013 / Page 8 of 17

9. STEERING & CONTROLS

The craft had power assisted steering system. It was tested as smooth and positive. The

hydraulic oil was at a good level.

The leg lift was working correctly. The QL trim tabs were in good condition..

Controls

The Volvo electronic controls were tested and found to easily and positively engage gears and

throttles.

Bowthruster

The electric Bowthruster was tested as working. The tunnel was securely glassed in.

10. ENGINES & OUTDRIVES

The engine and outdrive do not form part of the survey and are being reported on by the local

Volvo service agents.

© RP Marine Surveys Ltd / ‘XXX’/ Sealine SC35 / 21st May 2013 / Page 9 of 17

11. SEA TRIAL

The craft was taken on an approximately 1 hour sea trial with the surveyor and broker in

attendance. The fuel tank was just under ½ full. The water tanks were empty. Sea conditions

were force 2 and the sea state was slight.

Observations noted were:

Start Up

The engine started easily from cold and on subsequent occasions

The engine ticked over smoothly and evenly

The warning lights extinguished on start up

Oil pressures were good

Trial

Forward and reverse gears engaged easily and quietly -

The leg lifts were working

The trim tabs were working

The engines easily pushed the craft onto the plane

The engines were run at WOT (wide open throttle) for 30 minutes no defects noted

The oil pressures were both at 4.6 Bar

The engine temperatures remained at 85oC.

The top speed achieved was 28.5 knots @ 3400rpm

Each engine was run at WOT with the other trailing – results were almost identical.

Noise levels in the cabin were good and no excessive vibration was felt throughout

the rev range.

The engine hour meters were working.

The speed/depth was working.

The chartplotter was working.

The starboard windscreen wiper spring was not holding the wiper against the screen.

Recommendations

Repair the starboard wiper. (NUA)

© RP Marine Surveys Ltd / ‘XXX’/ Sealine SC35 / 21st May 2013 / Page 10 of 17

12. FUEL SYSTEM

Tanks

The craft had two alloy diesel tanks located in the engine bay. These were secure with no

defects were noted. There was no smell of fuel noted.

Recommendations

It is advised that fuel treatment/polishing additive is used and the tank is kept topped

up. (RMA)

Pipework

The pipes were to BS7480 standard and were in satisfactory condition where examined. The

O rings in the fillers were intact. The vent lines and fill line were secure, the deck/discharge

and tank fixings were double clipped.

Filters

The craft had a primary filters and secondary filters on the engine – no defects noted.

Shut Off

The emergency shut offs on the feed lines were working.

© RP Marine Surveys Ltd / ‘XXX’/ Sealine SC35 / 21st May 2013 / Page 11 of 17

13. OPENINGS, SEACOCKS, SKIN FITTINGS & PIPEWORK

The crafts openings, underwater through hulls, seacocks and associated pipe-work were

examined. All seacocks were left in the position as found. It was noted that:

1. The heads outlet had a 1 ½ Ball Valve type seacock that was tested as working. The

hose was helix reinforced plastic. It was secured with two stainless steel worm drive

clips at the valve. The valve was in good condition externally. It was not considered

to be a good quality marine grade type.

Skin fittings

The bronze skin fitting was tested by hitting smartly with a small hammer and its coatings

partially scraped to reveal some minor pinking.

The log and transducer fittings appeared externally in good condition but were not drawn for

examination.

Recommendations

Upgrade the heads intake/outlet seacocks and skin fittings for marine grade bronze or

DZR or ball valves being of better quality within the next 2/3 seasons use. (C+)

Regularly check valves and pipe work for integrity when launching and routinely

operate all seacocks to prevent seizure. Regularly check for tightness of jubilee clips.

Grease at the start of the season. Service the transducer/log seals regularly. (RMA)

14. WASTE INSTALLATION

The craft had an electric fresh water flush Jabsco marine toilet. This was tested as working

and in good condition.

Recommendations

None.

© RP Marine Surveys Ltd / ‘XXX’/ Sealine SC35 / 21st May 2013 / Page 12 of 17

15. PORT LIGHTS, HATCHES, COVERS & DOORS

The hatches on the deck were in good condition with no evidence of recent significant leaks.

The opening port lights on the hull were examined, there was no evidence of recent

significant leaks and they were considered to be in good condition. However there were a

few stains under some of the port lights – it was not known if these were from not closing the

portlights fully or from slight weeps. The folding cockpit sunroof canopy was a little difficult

to open.

The companionway door from the cockpit into the salon was in good order and tested as

working. The wipers were tested as working. The cockpit cover was in good serviceable

condition although it needed a wash. The opening sunroof was a little sticky.

Recommendations

Clean the covers. Grease the runners on the cockpit sunroof canopy. (NUA)

Clean under the opening portlights and pressure test with a hose to see if the seals

need replacing. (NUA)

16. FRESH WATER SYSTEM

The craft had an integral tank. Sample pipe work was checked to be in satisfactory order.

The system was pressurised with a diaphragm pump. This was working. There was a

calorifier under the cockpit floor and was tested as working from the engine and shore power.

Recommendations

None.

© RP Marine Surveys Ltd / ‘XXX’/ Sealine SC35 / 21st May 2013 / Page 13 of 17

17. D.C. ELECTRICAL SYSTEM

The craft had a 12 Volt system. There were sealed lead acid batteries for starting and

domestic requirements located in the aft cabin. The condition of the batteries was not known

but performed adequately during the survey and were green on the battery condition sight

glass indicators. The terminals were protected by the battery box lids. The main isolator

switches in the cockpit was working.

The DC system was fitted with rocker switches at the helm and breakers on the distribution

board in the saloon and next to the isolator switches. The fuses, wiring and associated

equipment where accessible was well made where partially examined, with none of the wiring

found to run in the bilge area and clear of any source of direct heat or fuel piping. The wiring

was PVC insulated. The cable sizes and fuse sizes were not checked for suitability as it was

not practical to do so within the survey. However most of the equipment was factory fitted.

Recommendations

None

18. A.C. ELECTRICAL SYSTEM

There was a 240V A.C. shore power system installed for outlets, calorifier and battery

charger. The shore power socket was in serviceable condition. There was a main input

circuit breaker and a RCD. The circuits were protected by individual circuit breakers in the

saloon.

An outlet was tested as working. The battery charger was tested as working. The calorifier

was tested as working. The system was tested with a basic socket tester. Lights indicated that

there was no fault.

The cable sizes and protection were not checked for suitability as it was not practical to do so

within the survey. However most of the equipment was factory fitted.

Recommendations

None.

© RP Marine Surveys Ltd / ‘XXX’/ Sealine SC35 / 21st May 2013 / Page 14 of 17

19. NAVIGATION EQUIPMENT

Detailed test/calibration of electrical and navigation equipment was outside of the scope of

this survey. However simple checks were performed.

Raymarine Log / Depth Preliminary test results were satisfactory

Raymarine ChartPlotter Preliminary test results were satisfactory

Raymarine Autopilot Preliminary test results were satisfactory

Raymarine DSC VHF Preliminary test results were satisfactory

Navigation lights Working

Recommendations

None.

20. SAFETY EQUIPMENT

Purchase navigation and safety equipment consistent with her anticipated cruising area. Note

the level and condition of safety equipment is the responsibility of the skipper.

It is always advised for reasons of personal safety that the craft should have a minimum safety

equipment of (that is in date/certified where applicable):

Life buoy and drogue

Man overboard light

A floating, throwing line

Man overboard recovery system

Danbuoy

Flare pack (in date)

Individual lifejackets & Harnesses

First aid kit

Thermal blankets

Fog Horn

Radar reflector

Liferaft or inflated dingy

VHF DSC

Hand held VHF

Hand held compass

Handheld GPS

Navigation Charts

Soft wood plug by each seacock

Further information can be found on this link

http://www.rya.org.uk/infoadvice/safteytips/Equipment/Pages/default.aspx

The RYA C8/02 “Cruising Yacht Safety” and RNLI yacht safety booklets should be referred

to for advice on fitting out the vessel with safety equipment.

© RP Marine Surveys Ltd / ‘XXX’/ Sealine SC35 / 21st May 2013 / Page 15 of 17

21. ANCHOR SYSTEMS & GROUND TACKLE

The craft had a Delta anchor stowed on the anchor roller. The anchor was attached to an

unknown length of 8mm chain in good condition. The electric windlass was tested as

working from the helm and the bow.

Recommendations

The scope of the anchoring gear should be suitable for the intended cruising area. A

secondary kedge anchor with suitable anchor chain/rode should be kept aboard. (BP)

22. BILGE

The forward Tsunami T1200 electric bilge pump was tested as working manually and from

the float switch. The Tsunami T1200 engine bay bilge pump was tested as working manually

and from the float switch.

Recommendations

None.

23. VENTILATION

There were no fixed vents and ventilation was minimal. There were 3 carbon monoxide

detectors noted.

Recommendations

As ventilation would be considered minimal, ensure hatches are open when

cooking/staying aboard to provide good airflow. (FYI)

© RP Marine Surveys Ltd / ‘XXX’/ Sealine SC35 / 21st May 2013 / Page 16 of 17

24. FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT

The craft had a portable 5A 34B powder extinguishers mounted under the companionway

steps and a large Halon replacement automatic extinguisher in the engine bay. The pressure

indicator dials were in the green zone. There was an un-mounted fire blanket.

Recommendations

Fit a smoke alarm. (B)

Mount the fire blanket in the galley. (NUA)

25. GAS SYSTEM

Note the surveyor is not a Gas Safe Registered Engineer and the cooker, the gas was not

switched on and the pipework was not pressure tested.

The gas system appeared to be in order with a factory fit and being only 3 years old

Recommendations

A ‘Gas Safe Register’ (formally CORGI) registered engineer with approval for marine

installations should check the installation a gas safe certificate. (RMA)

26. INTERIOR & DOMESTIC

The upholstery, joinery, linings and fittings were little used by way of wear. The fridges were

seen to work. The diesel heater was working. The electric BBQ was tested as working. The

shower pump was not tested.

Recommendations

None.

© RP Marine Surveys Ltd / ‘XXX’/ Sealine SC35 / 21st May 2013 / Page 17 of 17

CONCLUSION

To book a survey on your new Sealine SC35 purchase please ring or

email RP Marine Surveys

(01803) 832098

(01243) 790333

enquiries@rpmarinesurveys.co.uk

Roger Pinder REGISTERED MARINE SURVEYOR

BSC HONS ASSOCMIIMS. DIP.MAR.SUR.

RP Marine Ltd - Smugglers Barn - Norton - Dartmouth - Devon - TQ6 0NF

T. 01803 832098

E. roger@rpmarinesurveys.co.uk

W. www.rpmainesurveys.co.uk

RP Marine Surveys is the trading name of RP Marine Ltd –

Company Registered in England No. 7144265