yama 's works

20
Yama's works Using geomagnetic data (1)2003-10-29 (Halloween) event: quick development in 6 min. (2)2000-11-08 event: Isolated southward IMF propagation. (3)SSN-K (and SSN-Kp) relation: non- linearly low since 2004 (4)1986-9-12 event: PC-5 pulsation affecting ions (5)2002-5-19 event: Sunward propagating structure = aurora

Upload: nalani

Post on 05-Jan-2016

43 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

DESCRIPTION

Yama 's works. Using geomagnetic data. 2003-10-29 (Halloween) event: quick development in 6 min. 2000-11-08 event: Isolated southward IMF propagation. SSN-K (and SSN-Kp) relation: non-linearly low since 2004 1986-9-12 event: PC-5 pulsation affecting ions - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Yama 's works

Yama's worksUsing geomagnetic data

(1) 2003-10-29 (Halloween) event: quick development in 6 min.

(2) 2000-11-08 event: Isolated southward IMF propagation.

(3) SSN-K (and SSN-Kp) relation: non-linearly low since 2004

(4) 1986-9-12 event: PC-5 pulsation affecting ions

(5) 2002-5-19 event: Sunward propagating structure = aurora

Page 2: Yama 's works

2003-10-29 event

=> SW = 2000 km/s

Page 3: Yama 's works

Kiruna data gives most smooth curve

Page 4: Yama 's works

Ground ∆B + auroral image

evening-midnight

morning

0611:40 UT

0613:40 UT

0615:40 UT

0617:40 UT

IQA≈01 LT

Page 5: Yama 's works

Kiruna (65° GMLat) K index during the current maximum #24 (2011~) is nearly the same as values at solar minimums.

note: 21-24 UT means 22-01 LT, and magnetic midnight sector when aurora activity causes large K.

Extremely low solar activity since last solar minimun

Effect on the Earth? (SCOSTEP VarSITI program)

Page 6: Yama 's works

SSN – Kp (subdivided by different phases)

2. Kp since 2004 are the lowest for the same SSN

1. Each solar cycle must be subdivided by different phases (because the solar wind condition is different for the same SSN)

Min

Max

Incl.

Decl.

Page 7: Yama 's works

Reconstruct Kp from SSN(note: subdivide by different phases)

⇒ reconstruct within standard deviation except the recent 10 years. ⇒ change from 2004 is clear

Page 8: Yama 's works

“Chance of minor storm@high-latitude” by NOAA vs. observed Kp %

of o

bse

rve

d K

p (

larg

est

of t

he

da

y)

(Anna Larsson, high-school student project)

For the same prediction, Kp values are (model is different between 2000 ⇔ 2011): 2011-2012 < 2007-2008 & 2000-2001 < 2003-2004

Page 9: Yama 's works

2000-11-08 event

Unique IMF Bz=+10 nT -3 nT +10 nT change

Only once in 50 year’s Kiruna data (examined all data from 1954)

All polar geomagnetic stations showed similar signature, propagating tailward with the solar wind velocity

Presented at EGS 2001 (EGU = EGS + EUG), but could not publish because I got sick when I finished analyses

Page 10: Yama 's works

solar wind

Page 11: Yama 's works

Kiruna

AU

AL

X

Y

Z

Page 12: Yama 's works

1986-9-12 eventViking conjugate

Finland = conjugate + onlineKiruna = only analogue data

Page 13: Yama 's works

Viking

Page 14: Yama 's works

2002-5-19 event

Page 15: Yama 's works

IMAGE(FUV)

ions ≈ 3000 km/s

ions > 5000 km/s

0.01~40 keV

P/A

P/A

overview

06:42 06:46 06:4806:44

Page 16: Yama 's works

AE and Bx

1. Main phase of minor storm (Dst ~ -60 nT).

2. Substorm onset at around 06:25 UT but ceased in ~10 min.

3. New activity started at around 06:38 UT.

4. Aurora bulge arrived Cluster’s conjugate ~19 MLT at around 06:42~06:44 UT.

Page 17: Yama 's works

sunward propagation 1000~2000 km

Page 18: Yama 's works
Page 19: Yama 's works

Misato Aurora Camera

Page 20: Yama 's works

Misato Aurora Camera