yolo county workforce innovation board - yoloworks.org agend… · yolo county workforce innovation...

www.yoloworks.org

Yolo County Workforce Innovation Board A proud partner of America’s Job Center of CaliforniaSM network.

American’s Job Center of California - One-Stop Career Center Locations West Sacramento Woodland 500-A Jefferson Blvd., Building A 25 N. Cottonwood St (916) 375-6300 x4327 (530) 661-2750 x4327

Board Members All Phase Security Inc.

Buckhorn Steakhouse/ Putah Creek Café

California Dept. of Rehabilitation

California Employment Development Department

City of Woodland Economic Development

Clark Pacific

DMG Mori

Eclasstic, Thrive Interactive

La Cooperative Campesina

Los Rios Community College District

Olam Tomato Processors

Optimum Zendejas Home Loans

PrideStaff

Sacramento Central Labor Council (3)

Seminis Vegetable Seeds

The Scoop Frozen Yogurt Shop

Woodland Aviation

Woodland Adult Education

Woodland Community College

Yolo Food Bank

Yolo Employment Services, Inc.

> > > NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING < < <

Workforce Innovation Board September 13, 2017

8:00 – 10:30 AM America’s Job Center of California / Community Room / 25 North Cottonwood St., Woodland

AGENDA

8:30 a.m. Call to Order – Pledge of Allegiance

1. Welcome Comments, Introductions and Group Discussion

2. Public Comment / Announcements – Non-Agenda Items Workforce Innovation Board (WIB) members, staff, or the public may address the WIB on subjects relating to employment and training in Yolo County. A time limit of 3 minutes may be imposed. No action may be taken on non-agenda items.

3. Establish Quorum

4. Consider Agenda Approval

5. Consent Agenda – Approved with one motion unless item withdrawn for discussion a. Approve WIB minutes – July 12, 2017 (Attachment)

b. Ratify the WIB Executive Committee decisions of August 23, 2017, regarding Phase II MOUs Resource Sharing Agreement (Attachment) Page 4

c. Ratify the WIB Executive Committee decisions of August 23, 2017, regarding WIOA AJCC Operator (Attachment) Page 28

d. Ratify the WIB Executive Committee decision of August 23, 2017, regarding WIOA AJCC Certification Process (Attachment) Page 33

6. Regular Agenda a. Receive/Review/Approve 2018 WIB Meeting Calendar (Attachment) Page 38

b. Discuss Potential Revisions to WIB Bylaws/Authorize (if recommended) WIB Staff to Move Forward

7. Guest Speaker / Trainer – Charles Richards, Apprenticeship Consultant – Mr. Richards has been in his current position as an Apprenticeship Consultant for just about a year. Prior to this position, he worked for the Labor Commissions Office as a Deputy Labor Commissioner in the Bureau of Field Enforcement. He just recently retired from the US Army Reserve with 36 years of combined Active and Reserve time. He has a Bachler’s Degree in Business Finance and an extensive background in Sales, Strategic Management and Training.

8. Information Items a. Receive 2018 WIB Executive Meeting Calendar (Attachment) Page 39

b. Update: Conflict of Interest Form 700

c. Update: Local Plan for 2017-2020

d. Receive HHSA-WIOA and WIB Staff Reassignments Memo (Attachment) Page 40

e. Receive Workforce Services Draft Directive 169/70 Percent LLSIL and Poverty Guidelines for 2017 (Attachment) Page 41

f. Receive Workforce Services Directive 17-02/Salary and Bonus Limitations for 2017 (Attachment) Page 47

g. Receive Workforce Services Information Notice (WSIN) 17-01/Second Revised Amendment to

WIOA Formula Allocation – PY 16-17 (Attachment) Page 52

h. Receive WSIN 17-03/Program Year 2017-18 Rapid Response Funding (Attachment) Page 55

i. Receive WSIN 17-04/Deaf and Hard of Hearing Grantees for 2017-18 (Attachment) Page 58

9. WIOA Update

10. Reports a. Gary Pelfrey, WIB Chair

b. Elaine Lytle, Executive Director

11. Other Business That May Come Before the Board 12. Adjourn

Next Meeting:

November 8, 2017 – Yolo County Health and Human Services Agency

America’s Job Center of California

25 North Cottonwood St., Woodland / Community Room B

Accommodation: In accordance with Section 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you require special assistance, meeting materials to be in an alternative format, auxiliary aids, or other person to assist you while attending the meeting, we will provide reasonable accommodation to allow participation. Contact Cyndi Sechler at (530) 661-2750 ex. 4327 at least 3 business days prior to the meeting to facilitate arrangement.

For more about the Yolo County Workforce Innovation Board log on to www.yoloworks.org

www.yoloworks.org


America’s Job Center of California – One-Stop Career Center Locations West Sacramento Woodland 500-A Jefferson Blvd., Building A 25 N. Cottonwood Street (916) 375-6200 x4327 (530) 661-2750 x4327

Board Members

All Phase Security Inc.





Clark Pacific

DMG Mori






PrideStaff




Woodland Aviation



Yolo Food Bank


Yolo County Workforce Innovation Board

DRAFT Minutes

July 12, 2017

The Yolo County Workforce Innovation Board convened in the offices of Yolo County Health and Human Services Agency at 25 North Cottonwood Street, Woodland, CA, with the following persons in attendance:

Present: Alfred Konuwa, Brett Sanders, Don Palm, Gary Pelfrey, Jennifer Pike,

John Rodriguez, Ken Garrett, Kevin Sanchez, Matthew J. Vendryes, Maggie Campbell, Mary Renteria, Michelle N. Fadling, Paul Basi, Randy Young, Rob Carrion, and Susan Moylan

Absent: Alice Tapley, Benny Mitchell, John Pickerel, Marco C. Lizarraga, Robyn David-Harris, and Wendy Ross

Staff: Elaine Lytle, Lisa Vincent, Judy Needham, and Cyndi Sechler

Guests: Chris Almeida, PACT – Apprenticeship Construction Training Ioanna Iatridis, Dean CTE, Woodland Community College Kristy Wright, CEO, Woodland Chamber of Commerce Shannon Pelfrey, HR Manager, Woodland Aviation Robin Stenson, HR Manager, Mariani Nut

DeAnna Reed, Safety Supervisor, Mariani Nut Nolan Sullivan, Branch Director, Health & Human Services Agency Dan Maguire, Economic Developer, City of Winters Marc Marquez, Program Supervisor, Health & Human Services Agency Lorie Perez, Yolo County Office of Education Steve Roberts, Employment Specialist, Health & Human Services Agency Kara Perry, Administrative Assistant, Health & Human Services Agency

Call to Order – Pledge of Allegiance

Meeting called to order at 8:35 a.m. by WIB Chair, Gary Pelfrey.

1. Welcome Comments, Introductions and Group Discussion

2. Public Comment / Announcements – Non-Agenda Items WIB members, staff, or the public may address the Workforce Innovation Board Executive Committee on subjects relating to employment and training in Yolo County. A time limit may be imposed. No action may be taken on non-agenda items.

Dr. Alfred Konuwa introduced Woodland Community College’s new Dean of Career and Technical Education, Ioanna Iatridis. Dean Iatridis stated there are a couple of things they are looking at, 1) We’ve been approached by manufacturing, to work on soft skills, provide courses that deal with basic math and basic English. We are wanting to work with industry partners and business partners to have that dialog in terms of what else they need.

Judy Needham introduced Chris Almeida. Mr. Almeida works with the Pre-Apprenticeship Construction Training (PACT) program, through Washington Unified School District and Northern California Construction Training. They received grant money to offer a free 4 week Pre-Apprenticeship Construction Training program that prepares students for entry into the workforce.

1

Workforce Innovation Board

July 12, 2017 Jennifer Pike announced Clark Pacific will be hiring 100-150 new employees here locally.

Maggi Campbell announced Laborers Local 185 is currently recruiting for construction laborers all over Northern California; and they will be holding recruiting events in many counties.

Robin Stenson announced Mariani Nut’s season starts in August, and is looking to fill 100-150 seasonal positions.

3. Establish Quorum

Quorum established.

4. Consider Agenda Approval

Randy Young moved to approve the agenda; Matthew Vendryes seconded; motion passed.

5. Consent Agenda – Approved with on motion unless item withdrawn for discussion a. Approve WIB minutes – March 8, 2017

b. Ratify the WIB Executive Committee Recommendation on April 26, 2017 for the Appointment of WIB Member-One-Stop Partner; Mary Renteria/Employment Development Department.

c. Ratify the WIB Executive Committee Recommendation on May 18, 2017 for the Selection Committee funding recommendations in response to the WIOA Youth Services Solicitation 2017-02.

Randy Young moved to approve all Consent Agenda items; Brett Sanders seconded; motion passed.

6. Regular Agenda a. Receive/Discuss/Approve Policy Bulletin No. 16-1 Revision 1, Transition from the Workforce Investment Act to

the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act.

Don Palm moved to approve Policy Bulletin No. 16-1 Revision 1; Ken Garrett seconded; motion passed.

b. Receive/Discuss/Approve Policy Bulletin No. 16-6 Revision 2, Workforce innovation and Opportunity Act Funded Supportive Services and Incentives.

Randy Young moved to approve Policy Bulletin No. 16-6 Revision 2; Don Palm seconded; motion passed.

c. Receive/Discuss/Approve Workforce Services Directive 16-20/Certification Process for Comprehensive AJCCs.

Lisa Vincent asked WIB members to approve an Ad Hoc Committee for the Certification Process for a Comprehensive AJCC.

Don Palm moved to approve an Ad Hoc Committee for the Certification Process; Randy Young seconded; motion passed.

7. Guest Speaker / Trainer – Michael Lairmore, DVM, PhD., Dean of Veterinary Medicine, at U.C. Davis – Dr. Lairmore gave a presentation on the programs and services the School of Veterinary Medicine provides to contribute to the health of animals and people, while being good stewards of the environment and the economy of California.

8. Information Items

a. Receive the Yolo County WIB Bylaws as approved by the Board of Supervisors on March 21, 2017.

b. Receive WIB Roster

c. Receive Update Regarding Local Board Review of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act Title II Adult Education and Family Literacy Act (AEFLA) Applications.

d. Receive EDD Fiscal and Procurement Review Final Monitoring Report PY 2016-17 Issued to HHSA.

e. Receive HHSA Youth Services Program Review Final Monitoring Report PY 2016-17 Issued to RISE.

f. Receive Local Plan for 2017-2020 Update

2


July 12, 2017

g. Receive Resignation of WIB Member Cornelio Gomez

h. Update: Conflict of Interest Form 700

i. Update: Partner Memorandum of Understanding

j. Update: SlingShot

k. Receive Workforce Services Information Notice (WSIN) 16-60/WIOA Formula Allocations – PY 2017-18

Information items were discussed and received by WIB members.

9. WIOA Update

Gary Pelfrey stated we have been transitioning from the Workforce Investment Act (WIA) to Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) the last couple of years.

Lisa Vincent reported we are still in the transitioning phase. We have recognized who our partners are, we have signed MOUs and now we need to determine their share of cost. We are also working on the America’s Job Center of California (AJCC) Certification process, and working on changing our policies. Lisa also reported that our Local and Regional Plan was conditionally approved.

10. Reports

a. Gary Pelfrey, WIB Chair Gary thanked everyone for being here today; and reminded everyone that at the end of this year he will need to stepdown as the WIB Chair per our Bylaws. The new WIB Chair for 2018, needs to be someone who represents business, who has the skills and ability to step forward and lead our group. Gary stated that it is time for new leadership and fresh ideas.

b. Elaine Lytle, Executive Director Marc Marquez gave a slide show and reported on the June 21st Job Fair held at the Woodland Community/Senior Center. Marc stated we had 70 vendors and just over 300 job seekers. It was a fun day, and he thanked WIB Members who promoted and/or presented at the Job Fair or donated items. It was a great community effort.

c. Maggie Campbell, Ad Hoc Committee Chair Maggie stated the previous Ad Hoc Committee disbanded; but looking forward to working on the certification process for the America’s Job Center of California. Maggie also stated that once she has talked with the staff, and the Executive Committee meets, then she will be in contact to get things up and going.

11. Other Business That May Come Before the Board No additional business.

12. Adjourn Meeting dismissed at 10:28 a.m.

Next Meeting

September 13, 2017 Yolo County HHSA/Community Room B Woodland One-Stop 8:30-10:30 a.m.

Accommodation: In accordance with Section 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you require special assistance, meeting materials to be in an alternative format, auxiliary aids, or other person to assist you while attending this meeting, we will provide reasonable

accommodation to allow participation. Contact Cyndi Sechler at 530-661-2750 x4327 at least 3 business days prior to the meeting to facilitate arrangements.

For more about the Yolo County Workforce Innovation Board, log on to www.yoloworks.org

3






Clark Pacific

DMG Mori





PrideStaff




Woodland Aviation



Yolo Food Bank


TO: Members of the Workforce Innovation Board (WIB)

FROM: Gary Pelfrey, WIB Chair

DATE: September 13, 2017 SUBJECT: PHASE II MOUs – WORKFORCE INNOVATION AND OPPORUTNITY ACT (WIOA) - AMERICA’S JOB CENTER OF CALIFORNIA (AJCC) - RESOURCE SHARING AGREEMENT RECOMMENDED ACTION

Ratify the Executive Committee decisions of August 23, 2017, to:

1. Authorize the Chair of the Workforce Innovation Board to sign the American’s Job Center of California Resource Sharing Agreement (Attached).

2. Recommend the Board of Supervisors sign the Resource Sharing Agreement.

3. Authorize the HHSA/WIB staff to submit the Resource Sharing Agreement to the State Board.

REASON FOR RECOMMENDED ACTION

Workforce Service Directive (WSD) 16-09 regarding WIOA Phase II MOUs for Comprehensive AJCCs states, in part, that partners will address how to sustain the unified system described in Phase I through the use of resource sharing and joint infrastructure cost funding which must be in place at the local level by September 1, 2017.

BACKGROUND

In order to establish a high quality America’s Job Center of California (AJCC) also known as One-Stop delivery system and enhance collaboration amongst partner programs, WIOA requires Local Boards to develop MOUs with all AJCC required partners present in their Local Workforce Development Area. The expectation is that these MOUs serve as a functional tool as well as visionary plan for how the Local Board and AJCC partners will work together to create a unified service delivery system that best meets the needs of their shared customers.

FISCAL IMPACT

No fiscal impact. The Resource Sharing Agreement is a consolidated budget which identifies the share of infrastructure cost allocated to each AJCC collocated partner as well as each AJCC partner’s cost for the service delivery of applicable career services (basic and individual career services). AGENCY COORDINATION

HHSA/WIB staff to submit the Comprehensive Resource Sharing Agreement (Memorandum of Understanding Attachment D) to the State Board. Attachment: Comprehensive Resource Sharing Agreement/Attachment D

www.yoloworks.org



4

Attachment D

Page 1 of 23

Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act Resource Sharing Agreement

This Resource Sharing Agreement is intended to be a technical assistance tool rather that a required template. It should be used in whatever way best fits the needs of the Local Workforce Development Board (Local Board) and America’s Job Center of CaliforniaSM (AJCC) partners.

Table of Contents 1. Required Phase II MOU Component: Process and Development Page 3 2. Required Phase II MOU Component: Sharing Infrastructure Costs Page 5 Chosen Options: Each Comprehensive AJCC / Network of Comprehensive AJCCs Page 5 Comprehensive AJCC(s) / Colocated Partners Page 6 AJCC Infrastructure Budget Page 7 Infrastructure Cost Allocation Methodology Page 10 Third‐Party In‐Kind Contributions to Support the AJCC as a Whole Page 11 Initial Proportionate Share Allocated to Each Colocated Partner Page 12 Signature Page: Colocated Partners Sharing AJCC Infrastructure Costs Page 13 Signature Page: Non‐Colocated Partners Sharing AJCC Infrastructure Costs When Benefit Data are Available Page 14 3. Required Phase II MOU Component: Sharing Other One‐Stop System Costs Page 16

5

of 23

AJCC Partners Sharing Other One‐Stop System Costs Page 17 Required Consolidated Budget for the Delivery of Applicable Career Servicess Page 18 Partner Agreement to Share Other One‐Stop System Costs Page 20 Signature Page: AJCC Partners Sharing Other One‐Stop System Costs Page 21

6

of 23

1. Required Phase II MOU Component: Process and Development Local Workforce Development Area (Local Area): Yolo County Date Submitted: ________________________________________________________ (Due no later than 9/1/17.) Attachment: Signed Phase I MOU 1. The period of time this agreement is effective: The term shall commence on the date of execution by all parties and end on June 30, 2019. 2. Identification of all AJCC partners, Chief Elected Officials (CEO), and Local Boards participating in the infrastructure and other

system costs funding agreements. CEO/s: Yolo County Board of Supervisors (BOS) Local Board/s: Workforce Innovation Board (WIB) AJCC Partners Participating in the Infrastructure Funding Agreement (IFA): Yolo County Health and Human Services Agency (HHSA) and State of California, Employment Development Department (EDD)

AJCC Partners Participating in the Shared Other System Costs Agreement: As indicated on Attachment B of the MOU, HHSA; EDD; Yolo County Office of Education (YCOE); Yolo County Housing; California Human Development; Department of Rehabilitation; Woodland Adult Education; Washington Unified School District; and California Indian Manpower Consortium, Inc.

3. Steps the Local Board, CEO, and AJCC partners took to reach consensus and/or an assurance that the Local Area followed

guidance for the state infrastructure funding mechanism. WIB and BOS approved the release of MOU and related Attachments based upon the guidance provided by the State through Workforce Services Directive 16‐09, MOU Phase II Summit, and California Workforce Development Board technical assistance. In order to reach a consensus and maximize flexibility, HHSA convened partner meetings, emailed updates, and when necessary negotiated with specific partners.

7

of 23

4. A description of the process to be used among partners to resolve issues during the MOU duration period when consensus

cannot be reached. As described in the MOU, the parties agree to try to resolve or practice disputes at the lowest level. If issues cannot be resolved at this level, they shall be referred to the management staff of the respective partner for discussion and resolution.

5. A description of the periodic modification and review process that will be used to ensure all AJCC partners continue to

contribute their fair and equitable share of infrastructure and other system costs, including the identification of who will fulfill this responsibility. HHSA will convene and coordinate a review of this Resource Sharing Agreement, at least annually, jointly with all AJCC partners, and make revisions as needed.

Assurance from all non‐colocated partners that they agree to pay their proportionate share of infrastructure costs as soon as sufficient data are available to make such a determination. Signatures of authorized representative(s) of the Local Board, the CEO, and all AJCC partners who signed the Phase I MOU.

8

of 23

2. Required Phase II MOU Component: Sharing Infrastructure Costs Budget, Cost Allocation Methodology, Initial Proportionate Share

Phase II MOU Content Requirements: A budget outlining the infrastructure costs for each comprehensive AJCC in the Local Area with a detailed description of what specific costs are included in each line item. When establishing the infrastructure cost budget, Local Boards have two options: Option 1: Develop a separate budget for each comprehensive AJCC. Option 2: Develop a consolidated system‐wide budget for its network of comprehensive AJCCs If the Local Board chooses to negotiate infrastructure costs based on their network of comprehensive AJCCs, rather than center by center, then the budgets for all the comprehensive AJCCs can be consolidated into one system budget. However, this consolidation may not distort the distribution of costs as they must be attributable to each partner equally and in accordance with the agreed upon cost allocation methodology). Consolidations might allow the “financing” of infrastructure cost between partners more easily. It is not required that each partner contribute to each comprehensive AJCC, as long as their consolidated share of contributions equals their responsibility to pay as determined by the agreed upon cost sharing methodology.

The Local Board and AJCC partners have chosen this option for developing the infrastructure cost budget: ___X_ Option 1: A separate budget for each comprehensive AJCC. _____ Option 2: A consolidated system‐wide budget for the network of comprehensive AJCCs

9

of 23

Comprehensive AJCC(s) and Colocated Partners

‐ Include all comprehensive AJCCs Identified in the Phase I MOU ‐ Colocated Partner definition: All AJCC partners who have a physical presence within the center, either full time or part time.

Comprehensive AJCC #1 AgencyName/Address of the Comprehensive AJCC: Yolo County Health and Human Services Agency Service Centers Branch (Gonzales Building) Employment Center 25 N. Cottonwood Street Woodland, CA 95695 Partners Colocated at This AJCC: HHSA (WIOA Title I ) HHSA (TANF‐CalWORKs) EDD (Wagner‐Peyser)

10

of 23

AJCC Infrastructure Budget ___ Each Comprehensive AJCC (Name of AJCC _____HHSA Service Center/Gonzales Building/Employment Center__)

___ Network of Comprehensive AJCCs

Cost Category/Line Item Line Item Cost Detail Cost

Rent

Rental of Facilities:

HHSA ‐ WIOA Title I $139,064

HHSA ‐ TANF‐CalWORKs $450,017

EDD ‐ Wagner‐Peyser $1,334

Rental Costs Subtotal: $590,415.00

Utilities and Maintenance

Electric Included in the rent based on applicable methodology

Gas Included in the rent based on applicable methodology

Water Included in the rent based on applicable methodology

Sewer Connections Included in the rent based on applicable methodology

High‐Speed Internet Included in the rent based on applicable methodology

Telephones (Landlines) Included in the rent based on applicable methodology

Facility Maintenance Contract Included in the rent based on applicable methodology

Utilities and Maintenance Costs Subtotal: $0.00

Equipment

Assessment‐related products To Be Determined (TBD)

11

of 23

Assistive technology for individuals with disabilities (Access and Accommodation)

TBD

Copiers Included in the rent based on applicable methodology

Fax Machines Included in the rent based on applicable methodology

Computers Included in the rent based on applicable methodology

Other tangible equipment used to serve all center customers (not specific to an individual program partner)

Specify Other Tangible Equipment

TBD

Equipment Costs Subtotal:

Technology to Facilitate Access to the AJCC

Technology used for the center’s planning and outreach activities

Specify the Technology

TBD

Cost of creation and maintenance of a center website (not specific to an individual program partner) that provides outreach to customers by providing information on AJCC services and/or provides direct service access to AJCC services

Website Address: __________________________________

(Does not include data systems or case management systems specific to individual program partners.)

TBD

Technology to Facilitate Access Costs Subtotal: $0.00

12

of 23

Common Identifier Costs (Local Option, If Agreed To By All Colocated Partners)

Creating New AJCC Signage TBD

Updating Templates and Materials TBD

Updating Electronic Resources TBD

Common Identifier Subtotal: TBD SUMMARY OF TOTAL INFRASTRUCTURE COSTS TO BE SHARED BY COLOCATED PARTNERS

Cost Category Total Cost

Subtotal: Rental Costs $590,415.

Subtotal: Utilities and Maintenance Costs Included in the rent based on applicable methodology

Subtotal: Equipment Costs Included in the rent based on applicable methodology

Subtotal: Technology to Facilitate Access Costs TBD

Subtotal: Common Identifier Costs TBD

TOTAL INFRASTRUCTURE COSTS FOR THIS AJCC/Network: $590,415.00

13

of 23

Cost Allocation Methodology to Share Agreed Upon Infrastructure Costs

The Local Board and colocated partners must agree to a cost allocation methodology to identify the proportionate share of infrastructure costs each partner will be expected to contribute. Any cost allocation methodology selected must adhere to the following: ‐ Be consistent with federal laws authorizing each partner’s program

‐ Comply with federal cost principles in the Uniform Guidance. ‐ Include only costs that are allowable, reasonable, necessary, and allocable to each program partner. ‐ Be based on an agreed upon measure that mathematically determines the proportionate use and benefit received by each

partner.

Infrastructure Cost Allocation Methodology

Identify the chosen and agreed upon cost allocation methodology: The proportion of a partner program’s occupancy percentage of the AJCC (square footage) (This might differentiate between dedicated space to partners and common space, where more than one cost center is established so the distribution reflects a fair and equitable distribution of cost.) The proportion of partner program’s staff among all staff at the AJCC Other‐‐‐Please Describe the Methodology and the Rationale for Its Selection (This could reflect the traffic patterns and usage of the center by distinct and common customers and mathematically distribute cost in a fair and equitable means.)

14

of 23

Initial Proportionate Share of Infrastructure Costs Allocated to Each Colocated Partner

The initial proportionate share of infrastructure costs allocated to each partner based on the agreed upon cost allocation methodology, each partner’s estimated total contribution amount, and whether it will be provided through cash, non‐cash (in‐kind), and/or third‐party in‐kind contributions. This initial determination must be periodically reconciled against actual costs incurred and adjusted accordingly. AJCC partners (or their respective state entity) may provide cash, non‐cash, and third‐party in‐kind contributions to cover their proportionate share of infrastructure costs. If non‐cash or in‐kind contributions are used, they cannot include non‐infrastructure costs (such as personnel), and they must be valued consistent with Uniform Guidance Section 200.306 to ensure they are fairly evaluated and meet the partner’s proportionate share. If third‐party in‐kind contributions are made that support the AJCC(s) as a whole (such as space), that contribution will not count toward a specific partner’s proportionate share of the IFA. Rather, the value of the contribution will be applied to the overall infrastructure budget prior to determining proportionate amounts and thereby reduce the contribution required for all partners.

Third‐Party In‐Kind Infrastructure Contributions to Support the AJCC As Whole

Cost Categories Total Cost Contributor/s Value Balance to Allocate

Rent Not Applicable (N/A)

Utilities/Maintenance N/A

Equipment N/A

Access Technology N/A

Common Identifier N/A

Total Infrastructure Balance to Be Allocated to Colocated Partners: $590,415.00

15

of 23

Initial Allocation of Proportionate Share of Infrastructure Costs for Colocated Partners

Colocated Partner/s

Shared Infra‐ structure Costs

(Annual Estimate )

Application of Methodology

Allocated Initial Share

(Annual Estimate)

Amount: Cash

Amount: In‐Kind

Partner 1: HHSA (WIOA Title I)

$590,415 #Full Time Equivalent (FTE) AJCC Partner Co‐located Staff/#FTE HHSA‐Social Services Staff

23.5% / $139,064 $139,064 N/A

Partner 2: HHSA (TANF‐CalWORKs‐Welfare to Work)

$590,415 California Department of Social Services (CDSS) County Expense Claim (CEC)

76% / $450,017 $450,017 N/A

Partner 3: EDD (Wagner‐Peyser)

$590,415 Space Use/Lease Permit: CDSS appoved Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) applied to the total cost of square footage used Note: Yolo’s approved ICR for PY 2016‐17 is 20%

0.50% / $1,334 $1,334 N/A

16

of 23

Signature Page: Colocated Partners Sharing AJCC Infrastructure Costs The CEO, the Local Board Chairperson, and all colocated AJCC partners included in the sharing of infrastructure costs must sign. By signing below, all parties agree to the terms prescribed in the IFA. (BOS/CEO) ___________________________________________________ Printed Name and Title ___________________________________________________ Signature and Date (WIB/Local Board Chairperson) ___________________________________________________ Printed Name and Title ___________________________________________________ Signature and Date

(HHSA/Colocated AJCC Partner Entity) ___________________________________________________ Printed Name and Title ___________________________________________________ Signature and Date (EDD/Colocated AJCC Partner Entity) ___________________________________________________ Printed Name and Title ___________________________________________________ Signature and Date

17

14

Signature Page: Partners Sharing Infrastructure Costs When Proportionate Share Data Are Available Phase II MOU Content Requirement: The state is in the process of implementing the requisite statewide data tracking system, and once such data are available, all non‐colocated partners who are receiving benefit from the AJCCs will also be required to contribute their proportionate share towards infrastructure costs. Consequently, the Phase II MOU must include an assurance from all non‐colocated partners that they agree to pay their proportionate share of infrastructure costs as soon as sufficient data are available.

By signing below, all parties agree that when data are available to determine the AJCC benefit to non‐colocated partners, the infrastructure cost sharing agreement will be renegotiated to include their proportionate share of contributions. (Woodland Adult Education/Non‐Colocated AJCC Partner Entity) __________________________________________________ Printed Name and Title ___________________________________________________ Signature and Date (Washington Unified School District/Non‐Colocated AJCC Partner Entity) ___________________________________________________ Printed Name and Title ___________________________________________________ Signature and Date

(DOR/Non‐Colocated AJCC Partner Entity) ___________________________________________________ Printed Name and Title ___________________________________________________ Signature and Date (YCOE/Non‐Colocated AJCC Partner Entity) _________________________________________________ Printed Name and Title ___________________________________________________ Signature and Date

18

15

(CIMC/Non‐Colocated AJCC Partner Entity) ___________________________________________________ Printed Name and Title ___________________________________________________ Signature and Date (CHD/Non‐Colocated AJCC Partner Entity) ___________________________________________________ Printed Name and Title ___________________________________________________ Signature and Date (YH/Non‐Colocated AJCC Partner Entity) ___________________________________________________ Printed Name and Title ___________________________________________________ Signature and Date

19

16

3. Required Phase II MOU Component: Sharing Other One‐Stop System Costs

Phase II MOU Content Requirement: A budget outlining other system costs relating to the operation of the local One‐Stop delivery system and a description of what specific costs are included in each line item. The budget must include “applicable career services” as well as any other shared costs agreed upon by the AJCC partners and Local Board. While only colocated partners share infrastructure costs, all One‐Stop partners must share in other system costs, including applicable career services. All partners that signed the Phase I MOU must also sign the Phase II MOU for the sharing of other system costs.

The One‐Stop System Partners Included in the Sharing of Other One‐Stop Delivery System Costs _ X __ Title I Adult, Dislocated Worker, and Youth _ X __ Title II Adult Education and Literacy _ X __ Title III Wagner‐Peyser

_ X __ Title IV Vocational Rehabilitation

_ X __ TANF/CalWORKS _ X __ Carl Perkins Career Technical Education _ X __ Native American Programs _ X __ Migrant Seasonal Farmworkers

_ X __ Veterans _ X __ Trade Adjustment Assistance Act

_ X __ Housing and Urban Development _ X __ Unemployment Compensation

20

17

Required Consolidated System Budget for “Applicable Career Services”

The agreed upon budget for other system costs must align with the Phase I MOU agreement that outlined shared customers and services. If it does not, then the Phase I MOU must be amended to justify the budgeted system costs and align with Phase II. Therefore, Local Boards and AJCC partners should start by reviewing their signed Phase I MOUs in order to determine what each partner previously agreed to. The other system costs budget must be a consolidated budget that includes a line item for applicable career services. The signed Phase I MOU required identification of the career services that were applicable to each partner program. Accordingly, this budget must include each of the partner’s costs for the service delivery of each applicable career service and a consolidated system budget for career services applicable to more than one partner. If new costs are accepted in Phase II then they must include language amending the Phase I descriptions as Phase I and Phase II must align for this budget.

Applicable Career Services are services authorized to be provided under each partner’s program and are described in Attachment B to the MOU.

21

18

Required Consolidated Budget for the Delivery of Applicable Career Services

The other system costs budget must be a consolidated budget for applicable career services. This budget must include each of the partner’s costs for the service delivery of each applicable career service and a consolidated system budget for career services applicable to more than one partner. Unlike the IFA, other system costs should include all costs, including personnel, related to the administration and delivery of those services.

Applicable Career Services

T‐I Adult HHSA

T‐I DW HHSA

T‐I Youth HHSA

T‐II AEL Woodland

T‐II AEL W. Sac

T‐III WP EDD

T‐IV VR DOR

Basic Career Services: T‐I Eligibility/Initial Assess Outreach, Intake, Orient Labor Exchange/Job Search Referrals/LMI Support Service Info UI Info/Fin Aid Info

$172,154

$76,099

$180,479

$196,728

$6,968

$582,043

$407,019


TANF/CalWORKsHHSA

Tech Ed YCOE

Native Am CIMC

MSF CHD

TAA EDD

Housing YH

UI EDD

Basic Career Services: T‐I Eligibility/Initial Assess Outreach, Intake, Orient Labor Exchange/Job Search Referrals/LMI Support Service Info UI Info/Fin Aid Info

$1,815,098

$68,142

$

$51,710

$0.00

$17,893

$0.00

22

19


T‐I Adult HHSA

T‐I DW HHSA

T‐I Youth HHSA

T‐II AEL Woodland

T‐II AEL W. Sac

T‐III WP EDD

T‐IV VR DOR

Individual Career Services: Comp Assessment/IEP Career Plan/Counsel Short‐Term Pre‐vocational Internship/Work Experience Financial Literacy IET/ELA/WF Prep

$ 258,232

$114,149

$270,719

$149,327

$4,645

$102,713

$1,628,078


TANF/CalWORKs HHSA

Tech Ed YCOE

Native Am CIMC

MSF CHD

TAA EDD

Housing YH

UI EDD

Individual Career Services: Comp Assessment/IEP Career Plan/Counsel Short‐Term Pre‐vocational Internship/Work Experience Financial Literacy IET/ELA/WF Prep

$2,722,648

$108,070

$

$37,593

$0.00

$17,893

$0.00

Consolidated budget total of career services delivered through the One‐Stop system: $

23

20

Partner Agreement to Share Other One‐Stop System Costs

The other system costs budget is an optional partner agreement to share other One‐Stop system costs that are authorized for and commonly provided through the AJCC partner programs to any individual, such as initial intake, assessment of needs, appraisal of basic skills, identification of appropriate services to meet such needs, referrals to other One‐Stop partners, and business services. Shared operating costs may also include shared costs related to the Local Board’s functions. As with infrastructure costs, other system costs must be allocable according to the proportion of benefit received by each of the AJCC partner programs, consistent with the partner’s authorizing federal statute and Uniform Guidance. The AJCC partners will ensure that the shared costs are supported by accurate data, are consistently applied over time, and that the methodology used in determing the shared cost will be reflected in a separate Cost/Resource Sharing Agreement. These costs may be shared through cash, non‐cash, or third‐party in‐kind contributions. There is no state funding mechanism for other system costs that will be triggered due to lack of agreement at the local level for these costs. Because the other system costs budget is optional and the deadline for submission of the Phase II MOU Resource Sharing Agreement has been significantly accelerated imminent, the Partners agree to continue to discuss methods of sharing Other System Costs to be described in separately negotiated cost/resource sharing agreement based on an equitable and agreed upon formula or plan.

24

21

Signature Page: AJCC Partners Sharing Other One‐Stop System Costs All partners who signed the Phase I MOU must sign the Phase II MOU. By signing below, all parties agree to negotiate and implement a cost/resource sharing plan for the terms prescribed in the sharing of other One‐Stop system costs at a later date.

25

22

(BOS/CEO) ___________________________________________________ Printed Name and Title ___________________________________________________ Signature and Date (WIB/Local Board Chairperson) ___________________________________________________ Printed Name and Title ___________________________________________________ Signature and Date (HHSA/AJCC Partner Entity) ___________________________________________________ Printed Name and Title ___________________________________________________ Signature and Date (EDD/AJCC Partner Entity) ___________________________________________________

Printed Name and Title ___________________________________________________ Signature and Date (Woodland Adult Education/AJCC Partner Entity) ___________________________________________________ Printed Name and Title ___________________________________________________ Signature and Date (Washington Unified School District/AJCC Partner Entity) ___________________________________________________ Printed Name and Title ___________________________________________________ (DOR/AJCC Partner Entity) ___________________________________________________ Printed Name and Title ___________________________________________________ Signature and Date (YCOE/AJCC Partner Entity)

26

23

___________________________________________________ Printed Name and Title ___________________________________________________ Signature and Date (CIMC/AJCC Partner Entity) ___________________________________________________ Printed Name and Title ___________________________________________________ Signature and Date (CHD/AJCC Partner Entity) ___________________________________________________ Printed Name and Title ___________________________________________________ Signature and Date (YH/AJCC Partner Entity)

___________________________________________________ Printed Name and Title ___________________________________________________

27






Clark Pacific

DMG Mori






PrideStaff




Woodland Aviation



Yolo Food Bank



FROM: Gary Pelfrey, WIB Chair

DATE: September 13, 2017

SUBJECT: WORKFORCE INNOVATION AND OPPORTUNITY ACT (WIOA) AMERICA’S JOB CENTER OF CALIFORNIA (AJCC) OPERATOR REQUEST FOR QUOTE

RECOMMENDED ACTION

Ratify the Executive Committee decisions of August 23, 2017, to: 1. Receive WIOA AJCC Operator Request for Quote (RFQ). (Attached)

2. Receive Price Quote from Michael Indiveri. (Attached)

3. Authorize a WIOA AJCC Operator contract/agreement with Michael Indiveri to begin September 1, 2017.


WIOA Section 121[d][2][A] requires Local Boards to conduct an open and competitive process in order to select their AJCC Operators.

BACKGROUND

HHSA/WIB staff drafted the RFQ based on Federal, State, and Local guidance on behalf of the Workforce Development Board known as the Workforce Innovation Board (WIB).

HHSA/WIB staff solicited six (6) qualified vendors on June 30, 2017. HHSA/WIB staff received a question regarding the annual estimated cost of $10,000

on July 11, 2017. HHSA/WIB staff revised the annual estimated cost to $16,000 and provided

clarification to the six (6) qualified vendors on July 13, 2017. July 19, 2017, vendor deadline to submit a Price Quote.

o One (1) Price Quote received. August 9, 2017, HHSA/WIB staff negotiate contract details with Michael Indiveri.

FISCAL IMPACT

The total of $15,600 will come from the WIOA Formula Adult, Dislocated Worker, and Youth Formula Allocations (Federal Catalog 17.258, 17.278, and 17.259).

AGENCY COORDINATION

HHSA/WIB staff on behalf of the WIB drafted the RFQ based on Federal, State, and Local guidance; worked with Yolo County procurement staff regarding the competive process; negotiated contract terms; and drafted this recommendation.

Attachments: Request for Quote solicitation for the WIOA AJCC Operator and Price Quote from Michael Indiveri.

www.yoloworks.org



28

County of Yolo Health and Human Services Agency Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act Workforce Innovation Board

1

REQUEST FOR PRICE QUOTE: The Yolo County Health and Human Services Agency (HHSA) on behalf of the Workforce Innovation Board (WIB) is seeking a price quote for America’s Job Center of California (AJCC)/One-Stop Operator (Title 20 CFR Section 678.620[a]). HHSA in concurrence with the WIB is charged with the responsibility for selecting its AJCC/One-Stop Operator through a competitive process every four years. Yolo County has defined the role of the AJCC/One-Stop Operator in alignment with the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) as “coordinating the service delivery of required one-stop partners and service providers”. The AJCC/One-Stop Operator will facilitate communication, systems alignment, quality of service delivery and the development of cooperative relationships in order to achieve a Comprehensive One-Stop delivery system. Yolo County has a comprehensive one-stop located at 25 N. Cottonwood Street in Woodland CA, 95695 and an affiliate one-stop located at 500-A Jefferson Boulevard, Suite 100 in West Sacramento, CA 95605. The annual cost estimate for AJCC/One-Stop Operations is $16,000. The AJCC/One-Stop Operator may be a single public, private, or non-profit or consortium of entities. However, if a consortium of entities consists of AJCC/One-Stop partners, it must include a minimum of three of the required AJCC/One-Stop partners listed in WIOA Section 121(b)(1). The types of entities eligible to be an AJCC Operator includes the following (WIOA Section 121[d][2][B]):

An institution of higher education. An employment service state agency established under the Wagner-Peyser Act. A community-based organization, nonprofit organization, or workforce

intermediary. A private for-profit entity. A government agency. Another interested organization or entity, which may include a local chamber of

commerce or other business organization, or a labor organization. Roles include the following:

Coordinate the service delivery of required AJCC partners and service providers. Ensure the implementation of partner responsibilities and contributions agreed

upon in Memorandums of Understanding - Phase I and Phase II. Assist with the AJCC Certification Process.

29


2

Responsibilities in the following: Convene AJCC/One-Stop partners quarterly. Report to HHSA, the Executive Committee of the Workforce Innovation Board

(WIB), and/or the Workforce Innovation Board on operations, performance, and continuous improvement recommendation as deemed appropriate.

Implement policies established by the WIB. Adhere to all applicable federal and state guidance.

AJCC/One-Stop Operator must adhere to the following (Title 20 CFR Section 678.600):

Disclose any potential conflicts of interest arising from the relations of the AJCC/One-Stop Operator with particular training service providers or other service providers in accordance with Uniform Guidance Section 200.318.

Do not establish practices that create disincentives to providing services to individuals with barriers to employment who may require longer-term services, such as intensive employment, training, and education services.

Comply with federal regulations and procurement policies relating to the calculation and use of profits as outlined in the Uniform Guidance.

Adhere to any applicable firewalls or internal controls. If you are interested in serving as the Yolo County AJCC/One-Stop Operator, please submit the attached Price Quote Sheet (Exhibit A) no later than July 19, 2017, by email/ [email protected] or FAX/(530) 666-8831. Note: Provided for your consideration are the Services Contract Insurance Requirements (Exhibit B). Please contact Lisa Vincent at (530) 406-4458 or [email protected] if you have any questions relative to this request. Thank you.

30


3

EXHIBIT A. Price Quote Sheet Name of Project: Yolo County AJCC/One-Stop Operator Name: ________________________________________ ___ (Individual or Company) Mailing Address: ____________________________________ __________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ Telephone Number: __________________________________ Price Quote to complete Yolo County AJCC/One-Stop Operator as described in this Request for Price Quote package:

$_______________________

Entity Type: _________________________________________ Initial to Acknowledge Insurance Requirements: ____________ Signature: ___________________________________________ Date: _________________ If you are interested in serving as the Yolo County AJCC/One-Stop Operator, please submit the attached Price Quote Sheet (EXHIBIT A) no later than July 19, 2017, by email/[email protected] or FAX/(530) 666-8831.

31






Clark Pacific

DMG Mori





PrideStaff




Woodland Aviation



Yolo Food Bank


TO: Members of the Workforce Innovation Board (WIB) FROM: Gary Pelfrey, WIB Chair DATE: September 13, 2017 SUBJECT: WORKFORCE INNOVATION AND OPPORTUNITY ACT (WIOA)

AMERICAN’S JOB CENTER OF CALIFORNIA (AJCC) CERTIFICATION PROCESS

RECOMMENDED ACTION

Ratify the Executive Committee decision of August 23, 2017, to approve the Certification Process (attached) which tasks the AJCC Operator with the independent review and evaluation of the comprehensive and affiliate AJCCs as required by Workforce Services Directive (WSD) 16-20 in accordance with WIOA Section 121(g).


HHSA/WIB staff is requesting the AJCC Operator assist with the certification process for the comprehensive and affiliate AJCCs to avoid potential conflicts of interest.

BACKGROUND

WSD16-20 issued on June 9, 2017, provides guidance and establishes the procedures regarding certification of comprehensive AJCC locations. WSD 16-20 states, in part, that in accordance with WIOA Section 121(g), Local Boards must conduct an independent and objective evaluation of the AJCCs in their Local Area once every three years using criteria and procedures established by the State Board.

The initial AJCC certification process will be conducted during Program Year (PY) 2017-18 and take effect PY 2018-19. For this initial certification, Local Boards are only required to certify their comprehensive AJCCs. Beginning PY 2018-19, Local Boards will be required to certify their affiliate and specialized AJCCs. Further guidance regarding the certification of affiliate and specialized AJCCs will be released in a Directive during PY 2017-18. The WIOA Joint Final Rule outlines three (3) key requirements for AJCC certification: 1. Effectiveness of the AJCC, 2. Physical and programmatic accessibility for individuals with disabilities, and 3. Continuous improvement. California’s certification process is centered on these key requirements and sets a statewide standard of service delivery that ensures all customers consistently receive a high-quality level of service.

There are two levels of AJCC certification: Baseline and Hallmarks of Excellence. The Baseline AJCC Certification is intended to ensure that every comprehensive AJCC is in compliance with key WIOA statutory and regulatory requirements.

www.yoloworks.org



33

In order to receive Baseline AJCC Certification, an AJCC must meet all the following requirements: The Local Board has implemented a signed MOU with all the required AJCC

partners. This includes both Phase I and Phase II of the MOU process. The AJCC has implemented the board-defined roles and responsibilities of the AJCC

operator and career services provider (i.e., an operator and career services provider is in place and functioning within the AJCC)

The AJCC meet all regulatory requirements to be considered a comprehensive AJCC as identified in the WIOA Joint Final Rule Section 678.305.

The AJCC ensures equal opportunity for individuals with disabilities in accordance with the ADA, WIOA Section 188, and all other federal and state guidance.

The Hallmarks of Excellence AJCC Certification is intended to encourage continuous improvement by identifying areas where an AJCC may be exceeding quality expectations, as well as areas where improvement is needed. The State Board has identified eight (8) Hallmarks of Excellence with each one ranked on a scale of 1-5. It is important to note that certification is an individualized process; it will not be used to compare or rank one AJCC or Local Board against another AJCC or Local Board. In order to receive a Hallmarks of Excellence AJCC Certification, an AJCC must meet Baseline and receive a ranking of at least 3 for each of the following: 1. The AJCC physical location enhances the customer experience. 2. The AJCC ensures universal access, with an emphasis on individuals with barriers to

employment. 3. The AJCC actively supports the One-Stop system through effective partnerships. 4. The AJCC provides integrated, customer-centered services. 5. The AJCC is an on-ramp for skill development and the attainment of industry-

recognized credentials which meet the needs of targeted regional sectors and pathways.

6. The AJCC actively engages industry and labor and supports regional sector strategies through an integrated business services strategy that focuses on quality jobs.

7. The AJCC has a high-quality, well-informed, and cross-trained staff. 8. The AJCC achieve business results through data-driven continuous improvement.

As part of their process, Local Boards may choose to use staff, the AJCC Operator (unless it’s the Local Board), a subcommittee, or a neutral third-party to conduct the on-site, open, and independent evaluation of each comprehensive AJCC. Based on those evaluations, the individual(s) or entity that conducted the independent review can provide recommendations to the Local Board regarding certification status and continuous improvement strategies. It is the Local Board, however, that must officially decide and submit the certification status and accompanying continuous improvement plan for each of the comprehensive AJCCs in the Local Area.

To avoid potential conflicts of interest, the entity that conducts the on-site evaluations cannot be AJCC program partner staff or the Title I Adult and Dislocated Worker Career Services Provider. If a Local Board contracts out with a provider to serve as both the AJCC Operator and the Title I Adult and Dislocated Worker Career Services provider, that entity is also not allowed to conduct the on-site evaluation.

However, if a Local Board has been approved by the Governor to also act as the Title I Adult and Dislocated Worker Career Services Provider, Local Board staff may conduct the evaluation so long as there are clear and strong firewalls in place that separate the Local Board staff who work in the AJCCs from the Local Board staff

34

who would be conducting the on-site evaluations of those AJCCs. In this case, the State Board may request additional information and documentation from the Local Board to verify that the firewalls are substantive enough to remove any potential conflicts or biases.

Yolo County has one (1) comprehensive AJCC and one (1) affiliate AJCC, both AJCCs are located in the Yolo County Health and Human Services Agency (HHSA) Service Centers buildings and are known as the “Employment Center”. The Woodland AJCC is the comprehensive AJCC because Employment Development Department (EDD) has representatives on-site, whereas the West Sacramento AJCC does not have EDD representatives on-site which makes it an affiliate AJCC.

FISCAL IMPACT

In order to receive WIOA Title I funds (Adult, Dislocated Worker, and Youth), each Local Area is required to have at least one (1) comprehensive AJCC which must be certified by the Local Board.

AGENCY COORDINATION

The AJCC Operator to conduct the on-site evaluations and report to the Executive Committee and/or staff; the Executive Committee and/or the WIB will approve AJCC certification recommendations; and HHSA/WIB staff will finalize and submit the certification status and accompanying continuous improvement plan for the comprehensive AJCC prior to the June 30, 2018 deadline, and the affiliate AJCC certification prior to the deadline established in a future directive. Attachment: AJCC Certification Process

35

1

Yolo County Workforce Innovation Board AJCC Certification Process

Comprehensive AJCC:

Independent review and evaluations to be conducted by: Michael Indiveri, AJCC Operator

Firewalls in place to avoid a conflict of interest: See Exhibit A

Steps and associated timeline: AJCC Operator to visit comprehensive center, interview staff and conduct

review using “Baseline Criteria” matrix supplied in WSD16-20 and return recommendation on certification status of Comprehensive AJCC no later than November 2017.

AJCC Operator to conduct review using “Hallmarks of Excellence” criteria beginning January 2018 and returning recommendation in May 2018 on status of “Hallmarks of Excellence” certification.

Any additional criteria the Local Board has chosen to include (if applicable): Local Board has an opportunity to include additional criteria if deemed

necessary.

Affiliate AJCC:

Independent review and evaluations to be conducted by: Michael Indiveri, AJCC Operator

Firewalls in place to avoid a conflict of interest: See Exhibit A

Steps and associated timeline: AJCC Operator to visit affiliate center, interview staff and conduct review using

“Baseline Criteria” matrix supplied in WSD16-20 or future directive and return recommendation on certification status of Comprehensive AJCC no later than November 2018.

AJCC Operator to conduct review using “Hallmarks of Excellence” criteria beginning January 2019 and returning recommendation in May 2019 on status of “Hallmarks of Excellence” certification.

Any additional criteria the Local Board has chosen to include (if applicable): Local Board has an opportunity to include additional criteria if deemed

necessary.

36

2

Exhibit A

Board or Supervisors (Elected Officals)


(Workforce Development Board)

Competitively Procured

(AJCC Operator‐Michael Indiveri)

Health and Human Services Agency


Executive Director(Support Staff)

Workforce System Partners

(Memorandum Of Understanding)

Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act Adult, Dislocated Worker, and Youth

(Career Service Provider)


(Youth Service Provider‐YCCA)


(Youth Service Provider‐RISE)

Administrative Entity(Fiscal Agent)

37

www.yoloworks.org

Yolo County Workforce Innovation Board 25 North Cottonwood Street One-Stop Career Center Locations Woodland, CA 95695 (530) 661-2750 Woodland West Sacramento (530) 666-8831 FAX 25 N. Cottonwood St. 500-A Jefferson Blvd., Building A (530) 661-2750 (916) 375-6200






Clark Pacific

DMG Mori






PrideStaff




Woodland Aviation



Yolo Food Bank


Workforce Innovation Board Regular Meeting Schedule

(2nd Wednesday – Bi-monthly) 8:30 AM – 10:00 AM

January 10, 2018 March 14, 2018

May 9, 2018 July 11, 2018

September 12, 2018 November 14, 2018

Woodland One-Stop Career Center 25 N. Cottonwood Street

Community Room

Accommodation: In accordance with Section 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you require special assistance, meeting materials to be in an alternative format, auxiliary aids, or other person

to assist you when attending this meeting, we will provide reasonable accommodation to allow participation. Contact Cyndi Sechler at (530) 661-2750 ex. 4327 at least 3 business days

prior to the meeting to facilitate arrangements.


38

www.yoloworks.org

Yolo County Workforce Innovation Board

A proud partner of America’s Job Center of CaliforniaSM network.

America’s Job Center of California – One-Stop Career Center Locations West Sacramento Woodland 500-A Jefferson Blvd., Building A 25 N. Cottonwood St

(916) 375-6200 x4327 (530) 661-2750 x4327






Clark Pacific

DMG Mori






PrideStaff




Woodland Aviation



Yolo Food Bank


Workforce Innovation Board Executive Committee

Regular Meeting Schedule

(2nd Wednesday – Bi-monthly) 1:00 PM – 2:30 PM

February 28, 2018 April 25, 2018 June 27, 2018

August 22, 2018 October 24, 2018 December 5, 2018

Woodland One-Stop Career Center 25 N. Cottonwood Street

Clarksburg Room

Accommodation: In accordance with Section 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you require special assistance, meeting materials to be in an alternative format, auxiliary aids, or other person

to assist you when attending this meeting, we will provide reasonable accommodation to allow participation. Contact Cyndi Sechler at (530) 661-2750 ex. 4327 at least 3 business days

prior to the meeting to facilitate arrangements.


39






Clark Pacific

DMG Mori






PrideStaff




Woodland Aviation



Yolo Food Bank



FROM: Elaine Lytle, Executive Director

DATE: September 13, 2017

SUBJECT: STAFF REASSIGNMENT

Health and Human Services Agency (HHSA)/ WIB staff:

Cyndi Sechler will be moving to the Community Health Branch as the assistant to the new Community Health Branch Director; Mimi Hall. A transition plan between the HHSA Service Center and Community Health Branches is in the works until Cyndi’s vacancy call be filled. Health and Human Services Agency (HHSA)/Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) Title I (Adult, Dislocated Worker, and Youth) staff:

On July 31, 2017, Judy Needham assumed the role as the lead for a new Employment and Support Team. The WIOA Program staff (case managers) were transferred to Marc Marquez (Woodland) and Nancy Schou (West Sacramento). Marc and Nancy are experienced HHSA employees.

www.yoloworks.org



40

of 3

70 PERCENT LLSIL AND POVERTY GUIDELINES FOR 2017

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS The attached Directive is being issued in draft to give the Workforce Development Community the opportunity to review and comment prior to final issuance. Submit any comments by email or mail no later than July 31, 2017. All comments received within the comment period will be considered before issuing the final Directive. Commenters will not be responded to individually. Rather, a summary of comments will be released with the final Directive. Comments received after the specified due date will not be considered.

Email [email protected] Include “Draft Directive Comments” in the email subject line. Mail Employment Development Department

Attn.: WSB Policy Unit P.O. Box 826880 / MIC 69 Sacramento, CA 94280-0001

If you have any questions, contact Scott Osborne at 916-654-9762.

41

mailto:[email protected]

Date: July 11, 2017 Number: WSDD-169

Page 2 of 3 69:97

70 PERCENT LLSIL AND POVERTY GUIDELINES FOR 2017 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This policy provides the guidance and establishes the procedures regarding the 70 percent Lower Living Standard Income Level (LLSIL) for 2017 published by the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) in the Federal Register on May 23, 2017. This policy also issues the 2017 poverty guidelines published by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) in the Federal Register on January 31, 2017. This policy applies to all Local Workforce Development Areas (Local Areas) and is effective on their dates of publication in the Federal Register, May 23, 2017, and January 31, 2017, respectively.

This policy contains some state-imposed requirements. All state-imposed requirements are indicated by bold, italic type.

This policy supersedes Workforce Services Directive 70 Percent LLSIL and Poverty Guidelines for 2016 (WSD16-02), dated July 20, 2016. Retain this Directive until further notice. REFERENCES

• Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) Sections 3(36), 127(b)(2)(C), 132(b)(1)(B)(v)(IV), and 134(d)(1)(A)(x)

• Federal Register, Volume 82, Number 98, “WIOA; LLSIL” (May 23, 2017) • Federal Register, Volume 82, Number 19, “Annual Update of the HHS Poverty

Guidelines” (January 31, 2017) BACKGROUND

The WIOA Section 3(36)(A) sets the criteria Local Areas use in determining whether an individual is a low-income individual. These criteria include two sets of data: the poverty guidelines, as published by HHS; and 70 percent of the LLSIL, as published by DOL. The Local Areas are to use the higher of these two measures to establish low-income status for eligibility purposes of WIOA Title I programs. The WIOA requires annual revisions to both sets of data. All Local Areas use the same poverty guidelines. However, the LLSIL identifies maximum qualifying income levels for residents in either of two broad geographic designations: metropolitan and

42

https://www.doleta.gov/llsil/2017_Federal_Register_Notice.pdf

http://familiesusa.org/sites/default/files/product_documents/2017-02076.pdf

http://familiesusa.org/sites/default/files/product_documents/2017-02076.pdf

Draft Directive Page 3 of 3

non-metropolitan areas. Metropolitan income levels apply to residents living within Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) as defined by the Office of Management and Budget. Non-metropolitan income levels apply to places with populations under 50,000. In addition to the broad metropolitan and non-metropolitan designations, the DOL identifies three MSAs in California that have unique LLSILs: the San Francisco/Oakland/San Jose MSA, the Los Angeles/Riverside/Orange County MSA, and the San Diego MSA. POLICY AND PROCEDURES

Follow these steps to determine if a person is a low-income individual:

1. Select the appropriate table for use by your Local Area from the five tables in the attachment (In those instances where a Local Area encompasses both metropolitan and non-metropolitan areas, the state has designated the higher of LLSIL figures for use in the entire Local Area).

2. Use the higher of either the LLSIL or the poverty guideline for the appropriate family size to determine low income status. A comparison of the applicant’s actual family income during the six-month income determination period with the six-month figures on the charts enables the reviewer to immediately determine income status.

3. Local Workforce Development Boards must set the criteria for determining whether employment leads to self-sufficiency. At a minimum, such criteria must provide that self-sufficiency means employment that pays at least 100 percent of the LLSIL established for a Local Area.

ACTION

Notify all affected staff of the changes to the LLSIL and poverty guidelines in this Directive. INQUIRIES

If you have any questions, contact your Regional Advisor at 916-654-7799.

/S/ JAIME L. GUTIERREZ, Chief Central Office Workforce Services Division Attachment is available on the internet:

70 percent LLSIL and Poverty Guidelines for 2017

43

http://www.edd.ca.gov/Jobs_and_Training/Regional_Advisor_Listing.htm

wsdd-169att1.docx

ATTACHMENT 1

70 PERCENT LLSIL AND POVERTY GUIDELINES FOR 2017

Page 1 of 3

The Lower Living Standard Income Level (LLSIL) and poverty guidelines are used to establish low‐income status for Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) Title I programs. Local Workforce Development Areas (Local Areas) use the LLSIL to determine eligibility of youth, eligibility of employed adults for certain services, self‐sufficiency, and eligibility for the Work Opportunity Tax Credit. Local Areas should consult the WIOA for more specific guidance.

Tables 1 through 5 show the 70 percent LLSIL and the poverty guidelines for western metropolitan and non‐metropolitan areas, and for three specific Metropolitan Statistical Areas in California. In addition, each LLSIL table includes the 100 percent LLSIL that establishes the Department of Labor minimum self‐sufficiency levels. The last column in each table shows the amount to be added to the figure for a family of six for each additional family member.

Since the income received during the six‐month period immediately prior to the individual's application for WIOA funded services is used for income determination, each chart below shows the six‐month, as well as the annual, figures for each family size. A comparison of the applicant's actual family income during the six‐month income determination period with the six‐month figures on the charts enables the reviewer to immediately determine an individual’s eligibility. Effective Dates

LLSIL May 23, 2017 Poverty Guidelines January 26, 2017

Table 1 —Metropolitan Areas

Local Areas

Fresno County Golden Sierra Consortium Imperial County Kern/Inyo/Mono Consortium Kings County Madera County

Merced County Monterey County NoRTEC Consortium North Central Consortium Sacramento City/Co. San Joaquin County

San Luis Obispo CountySanta Barbara County Stanislaus County Tulare County Yolo County

Family Size

1 2 3 4 5 6 Each Add'l add

70% LLSIL Annual $10,593 $17,360 $23,835 $29,423 $34,720 $40,610 $5,8906 Months $5,297 $8,680 $11,918 $14,712 $17,360 $20,305 $2,945100% $15,133 $24,800 $34,050 $42,033 $49,600 $58,014 $8,414Poverty Guidelines Annual $12,060 $16,240 $20,420 $24,600 $28,780 $32,960 $4,1806 Months $6,030 $8,120 $10,210 $12,300 $14,390 $16,480 $2,090

44

of 3

Table 2—Non‐metropolitan Areas

Local Areas Humboldt County Mendocino County

Mother Lode Consortium

Family Size



Table 3—San Francisco/Oakland/San Jose Metropolitan Statistical Area

Local Areas

Alameda County Contra Costa County Workforce Alliance of the North Bay (formerly Marin, Napa/Lake)

NOVA Consortium Oakland City Richmond City San Benito San Francisco City/Co.

San Jose/Silicon Valley Santa Cruz County Solano County Sonoma County

Family Size



45

of 3

Table 4—Los Angeles/Riverside/Orange County Metropolitan Statistical Area

Local Areas Anaheim Foothill E&T Consortium Pacific Gateway Los Angeles City Los Angeles County

Orange County Riverside County Santa Ana City San Bernardino CountySELACO Consortium

South Bay Consortium Ventura County Verdugo Consortium

Family Size



Table 5—San Diego Metropolitan Statistical Area

Local Area San Diego Consortium

Family Size



46

Date: August 4, 2017 Number: WSD17-02

Page 1 of 5 69:97

SALARY AND BONUS LIMITATIONS FOR 2017

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This policy provides the guidance and establishes the procedures regarding the 2017 salary and bonus limitations for individuals paid by funds appropriated to the Department of Labor (DOL) Employment and Training Administration (ETA). This policy applies to all subrecipients expending Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) program funds. The 2017 salary rates for executive level employees became effective January 1, 2017. This policy contains no state-imposed requirements. This Directive finalizes Workforce Services Draft Directive Salary and Bonus Limitations for 2017 (WSDD-167), issued for comment on May 30, 2017. The Workforce Development Community submitted no comments during the draft comment period. This policy supersedes Workforce Services Directive Salary and Bonus Limitations for 2016 (WSD16-06), dated August 8th, 2016. Retain this directive until further notice.

REFERENCES

• Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act for Defense, the Global War on Terror, and Hurricane Recovery, 2006 (Public Law 109-234), Title VII, Section 7013

• DOL Training and Employment Guidance Letter (TEGL) 05-06, Implementing the Salary and Bonus Limitations in Public Law 109-234 (August 15, 2006)

• U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 2017 Rates of Pay for the Executive Schedule

BACKGROUND

On June 15, 2006, President Bush signed into law an emergency supplemental appropriations bill, Public Law 109-234. Section 7013 of this law limits the salary and bonus compensation for

47

https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/pay-leave/salaries-wages/salary-tables/pdf/2017/EX.pdf

of 5

individuals paid by funds appropriated to ETA and provided to recipients and subrecipients. Specifically, Section 7013 states the following:

“None of the funds appropriated in Public Law 109-149 or prior acts under the heading ‘Employment and Training’ that are available for expenditure on or after the date of enactment of this section shall be used by a recipient or subrecipient of such funds to pay the salary and bonuses of an individual, either as direct costs or indirect costs, at a rate in excess of Executive Level II, except as provided for under Section 101 of Public Law 109-149. This limit shall not apply to vendors providing goods and services as defined in the Office of Management and Budget Circular A-133. Where States are recipients of such funds, States may establish a lower limit for salaries and bonuses of those receiving salaries and bonuses from subrecipients of such funds, taking into account factors including the relative cost-of-living in the State, the compensation levels for comparable State or local government employees, and the size of the organization that administers federal programs involved including Employment and Training Administration programs.”

As a result of this law, the ETA issued TEGL 05-06 on August 15, 2006. This TEGL discusses the limitations on salary and bonus payments that can be made with funds appropriated to the ETA. Specifically, this TEGL provides information on programs affected by this provision, effective dates and funding cycles, covered individuals and transactions, application of the limitation, and related grant and contract modifications.

POLICY AND PROCEDURES

Public Law 109-234 sets the limit on salary and bonus compensation for individuals paid by funds appropriated to ETA at a rate equivalent to no more than Executive Level II. A salary table providing this rate is listed on the Pay and Leave page of the Federal Office of Personnel Management’s website. These levels are adjusted annually. Effective January 1, 2017, the salary and bonus limit is set at $187,000. It should be noted that these limitations do not apply to benefits that are not salary and bonuses. For example, fringe benefits, insurance premiums, or pension plans paid by a subrecipient are not included in this calculation. Per DOL’s ETA Region 6 Office, the salary and bonus limit applies to both the gross amount of salary and bonus, and to the rate at which the salary is paid. As a result, for individuals who do not work full time on ETA funded projects or who are only employed part time or part of the year, the salary and bonus limit will be prorated based on the amount of time the individual is dedicated to the ETA funded grant. The following are examples provided by DOL ETA Region 6 to illustrate how the limitations are calculated based on salary and bonus levels, as well as the rate at which they are paid:

48

of 5

Example 1 An Executive Director’s W-2 for 2017 includes $150,000 of gross compensation. He worked part time (.50 Full Time Equivalent [FTE]) all year. One hundred percent of the Executive Director’s salary costs benefited ETA-funded programs. 2017 Salary and Bonus Limit $187,000 Salary eligible for the salary and bonus limit $93,500 .50 FTE x 100% of salary = 50% (Calculation: $187,000 x 50%) Total gross compensation $150,000 Salary costs benefitting ETA-funded programs $150,000 (Calculation: $150,000 x 100%) Salary in excess of the salary and bonus limit $56,500 (Calculation: $150,000 - $93,500) In this scenario, the Executive Director’s salary is eligible for 50 percent of the annual salary and bonus limit (.50 FTE x 100% of his salary benefited ETA-funded programs). Therefore, $93,500 ($187,000 x 50% = $93,500) of the salary may be paid using ETA appropriated funds or other federal funds. The remaining $56,500 ($150,000 - $93,500 = $56,500) of the salary is in excess of the allowable 2017 salary and bonus limit and must therefore be paid using non-federal funds. Example 2 An Executive Director’s W-2 for 2017 includes $150,000 of gross compensation. He worked part time (.50 FTE) all year. Seventy percent of the Executive Director’s salary costs benefited ETA-funded programs. 2017 Salary and Bonus Limit $187,000 Salary eligible for the salary and bonus limit $65,450 .50 FTE x 70% of salary = 35% (Calculation: $187,000 x 35%) Total gross compensation $150,000 Salary costs benefitting ETA-funded programs $105,000 (Calculation: $150,000 x 70%) Salary in excess of the salary and bonus limit $39,550 (Calculation: $105,000 - $65,450)

49

of 5

In this scenario, the Executive Director’s salary is eligible for 35 percent of the annual salary and bonus limit (.50 FTE x 70% of his salary benefited ETA-funded programs). Therefore, $65,450 ($187,000 x 35% = $65,450) of the salary may be paid using ETA appropriated funds or other federal funds. Since only 70 percent of the Executive Director’s salary costs benefited ETA-funded programs, the remaining amount of $39,550 ($150,000 x 70% = $105,000 - $65,450 = $39,550), which is in excess of the allowable 2017 salary and bonus limit, must be paid using non-federal funds. Example 3 An Executive Director’s W-2 for 2017 includes $200,000 of gross compensation. He worked full time all year. Forty percent of the Executive Director’s salary costs benefited ETA-funded programs. 2017 Salary and Bonus Limit $187,000 Salary eligible for the salary and bonus limit $74,800 (Calculation: $187,000 x 40%) Total gross compensation $200,000 Salary costs benefitting ETA-funded programs $80,000 (Calculation: $200,000 x 40%) Salary in excess of the salary and bonus limit $5,200 (Calculation: $80,000 - $74,800) In this scenario, the Executive Director’s salary is eligible for 40 percent of the annual salary and bonus limit (40% of his salary benefited ETA-funded programs). Therefore, $74,800 ($187,000 x 40% = $74,800) of the salary may be paid using ETA appropriated funds or other federal funds. Since only 40 percent of the Executive Director’s salary costs benefited ETA-funded programs, the remaining amount of $5,200 ($200,000 x 40% = $80,000 - $74,800 = $5,200), which is in excess of the allowable 2017 salary and bonus limit, must be paid using non-federal funds. All subrecipients of WIOA program funds are required to comply with federal requirements regarding the limitations on salary and bonus payments. Additionally, subrecipients are required to follow the instructions for implementing the salary and bonus limitations as provided in TEGL 05-06.

ACTION

Bring this directive to the attention of all affected staff and subrecipients.

50

https://wdr.doleta.gov/directives/attach/TEGL/TEGL05-06_508.pdf

of 5

INQUIRIES

If you have any questions, contact your assigned Regional Advisor at 916-654-7799.

/S/ JAIME L. GUTIERREZ, Chief Central Office Workforce Services Division

51


Date: July 17, 2017 Number: WSIN17-01

Expiration Date: 08/17/2019

Page 1 of 1 69:45

SECOND REVISED AMENDMENT TO WIOA

FORMULA ALLOCATION – PY 16-17

The Department of Labor (DOL) released Training and Employment Guidance Letter (TEGL) 17-15, Change 3 on June 21, 2017, which fully restores allocations to initial levels, providing the state with additional Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) formula funds. In addition, DOL issued TEGL 24-16 on March 16, 2017, which adjusted the funding levels for Program Year (PY) 2016 allotments for the Dislocated Worker program under WIOA Title I Section 132(c) on recapture and reallotment. The revised allotments to California and the amounts available for formula allocation to the Local Workforce Development Areas (Local Areas) are listed below. Attachment 1 reflects the revised total PY 16-17 amounts Local Areas will receive for each of the funding streams.

PY 16-17 Title I Total Allotment Formula Allocation Adult Program $123,210,917 $104,729,280 Youth Program $128,788,366 $109,470,112 Dislocated Worker Program $169,776,924 $101,866,156

If you have any questions, please contact Laura Caputo from the Financial Management Unit at [email protected].


1. Youth, Adult, and Dislocated Worker Activity Program Allotments (Revision 3) 2. WIOA Funding PY 16-17 (Revision 3)

52


wsin17-01att1.xlsx

wsin17-01att2.xls

Workforce Innovation and Opportunity ActYouth, Adult, and Dislocated Worker Activities Program Allocations

Program Year 2016‐17 (Revision 3)

ATTACHMENT 1

Local Area Youth AdultDislocated Worker Adult

Dislocated Worker Grand Total

Alameda $1,852,462 $221,460 $375,727 $1,517,688 $2,003,807 $5,971,144Anaheim City $865,257 $105,877 $117,349 $725,588 $625,838 $2,439,909Contra Costa $1,669,928 $209,526 $339,709 $1,435,904 $1,811,718 $5,466,785Foothill $672,173 $87,940 $95,660 $602,663 $510,169 $1,968,605Fresno $4,639,966 $557,441 $687,181 $3,820,197 $3,664,838 $13,369,623Golden Sierra $1,001,088 $124,602 $193,878 $853,906 $1,033,980 $3,207,454Humboldt $381,561 $42,335 $48,835 $290,126 $260,446 $1,023,303Imperial $1,801,123 $226,880 $328,624 $1,554,833 $1,752,603 $5,664,063Kern, Inyo, Mono $3,978,187 $487,432 $580,831 $3,340,417 $3,097,660 $11,484,527Kings $641,789 $92,763 $97,688 $635,716 $520,983 $1,988,939Long Beach/Pacific Gateway $2,018,168 $235,112 $202,899 $1,611,243 $1,082,090 $5,149,512Los Angeles City $15,347,624 $1,891,029 $1,559,578 $12,959,393 $8,317,447 $40,075,071Los Angeles County $12,265,216 $1,495,493 $1,425,028 $10,248,753 $7,599,879 $33,034,369Madera $653,598 $84,866 $98,643 $581,596 $526,080 $1,944,783Mendocino $221,300 $28,600 $34,355 $195,996 $183,221 $663,472Merced $1,336,688 $160,803 $203,765 $1,101,995 $1,086,711 $3,889,962Monterey $1,529,554 $198,145 $314,158 $1,357,906 $1,675,451 $5,075,214Mother Lode $394,015 $58,805 $67,365 $402,999 $359,268 $1,282,452NoRTEC $2,394,786 $293,203 $343,975 $2,009,346 $1,834,473 $6,875,783North Bay $754,257 $105,421 $145,419 $722,461 $775,541 $2,503,099North Central Counties $1,046,332 $123,227 $169,564 $844,484 $904,307 $3,087,914NOVA‐San Mateo $1,565,292 $201,105 $344,686 $1,378,189 $1,838,260 $5,327,532Oakland City $1,437,498 $179,978 $169,934 $1,233,403 $906,282 $3,927,095Orange $3,309,493 $391,001 $735,905 $2,679,567 $3,924,692 $11,040,658Richmond City $375,881 $50,069 $43,465 $343,128 $231,806 $1,044,349Riverside $6,448,535 $789,904 $991,404 $5,413,288 $5,287,307 $18,930,438Sacramento $3,763,899 $457,105 $584,167 $3,132,582 $3,115,451 $11,053,204San Benito $202,210 $24,293 $37,211 $166,484 $198,454 $628,652San Bernardino County $5,998,495 $723,563 $839,287 $4,958,647 $4,476,040 $16,996,032San Diego $7,310,414 $851,298 $1,192,116 $5,834,028 $6,357,729 $21,545,585San Francisco $1,308,458 $183,820 $284,022 $1,259,734 $1,514,734 $4,550,768San Joaquin $2,825,766 $335,624 $424,791 $2,300,065 $2,265,473 $8,151,719San Jose ‐ Silicon Valley $2,502,712 $301,023 $420,919 $2,062,935 $2,244,825 $7,532,414San Luis Obispo $669,704 $65,597 $84,786 $449,545 $452,178 $1,721,810Santa Ana City $1,034,615 $128,938 $98,456 $883,624 $525,081 $2,670,714Santa Barbara $1,227,998 $112,199 $155,998 $768,912 $831,958 $3,097,065Santa Cruz $1,007,272 $112,578 $155,921 $771,510 $831,553 $2,878,834SELACO $1,172,289 $141,675 $165,806 $970,909 $884,270 $3,334,949Solano $977,259 $137,009 $188,073 $938,934 $1,003,023 $3,244,298Sonoma $956,999 $114,773 $162,281 $786,553 $865,469 $2,886,075South Bay $1,803,221 $234,370 $261,996 $1,606,158 $1,397,266 $5,303,011Stanislaus $2,243,498 $275,163 $354,662 $1,885,721 $1,891,466 $6,650,510Tulare $2,412,436 $291,948 $381,914 $2,000,746 $2,036,804 $7,123,848Ventura $1,906,759 $221,947 $358,668 $1,521,025 $1,912,828 $5,921,227Verdugo $818,257 $110,951 $126,925 $760,354 $676,912 $2,493,399Yolo $726,080 $69,162 $90,975 $473,976 $485,186 $1,845,379TOTAL $109,470,112 $13,336,053 $16,084,599 $91,393,227 $85,781,557 $316,065,548

Round 2Round 1

53

Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) FundingState Fiscal Year (SFY) 2016‐17 (Revision 3)

ATTACHMENT 2

Funding StreamRound 1 (Base)

ShareRound 2 (Advance)

Share Total

Youth Total 128,788,366$ ‐$ 128,788,366$ Formula 109,470,112$ 85.00% ‐$ 109,470,112$ Governor's Discretionary 19,318,254$ 15.00% ‐$ 19,318,254$ Adult Total 15,689,474$ 107,521,443$ 123,210,917$ Formula 13,336,053$ 85.00% 91,393,227$ 85.00% 104,729,280$ Governor's Discretionary 2,353,421$ 15.00% 16,128,216$ 15.00% 18,481,637$ Dislocated Worker Total 26,807,663$ 142,969,261$ 169,776,924$ Formula 16,084,599$ 60.00% 85,781,557$ 60.00% 101,866,156$ Rapid Response 6,701,915$ 25.00% 35,742,315$ 25.00% 42,444,230$ Governor's Discretionary 4,021,149$ 15.00% 21,445,389$ 15.00% 25,466,538$ Total WIOA Funds 171,285,503$ 250,490,704$ 421,776,207$ Formula 138,890,764$ 177,174,784$ 316,065,548$ Rapid Response 6,701,915$ 35,742,315$ 42,444,230$ Governor's Discretionary 25,692,824$ 37,573,605$ 63,266,429$

* Program Year 2016‐17 WIOA allotments based on TEGL 17‐15, Change 3, dated June 21, 2017.

54

Date: August 1, 2017 Number: WSIN17-03


Page 1 of 2 69:46

PROGRAM YEAR 2017-18 RAPID RESPONSE FUNDING

The Rapid Response (RR) and Layoff Aversion (LA) funding provided to Local Workforce Development Areas (Local Areas) for the period of July 1, 2017, through June 30, 2018, has been released (see attachment for specific funding detail). Please note these allocations include both the “formula” RR funding along with separate allocations for LA, consistent with the policy detailed in Workforce Services Directive WSD16-04 published on July 22, 2016. Use of Rapid Response and Layoff Aversion Funds These funds can only be used to defray the cost of required and allowable RR activities in response to layoffs, business closures, and natural disasters. Only expenditures for activities described in Sections 3(51) and 134(a)(2)(A) of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) will be reimbursed under the formula RR grant codes. Other activities not described in these sections must be paid with other funds. As referenced in Directive WSD14-3, baseline, layoff-based, and hold-harmless RR funds will continue to be issued to each Local Area in their master subgrant, as grant codes 540 and 541. These formula RR funds may be spent on the wide range of required and/or allowable activities. Local Areas shall continue to report Incumbent Worker Training (IWT) participant enrollments funded with RR formula funds, under grant code 2274. LA funding will be issued under grant codes 292 and 293 in each Local Area’s master subgrant. These funds are to be spent exclusively on LA activities, which don’t include IWT. Participants receiving Additional Assistance services must be enrolled in grant code 241. Funds used for training services when serving Additional Assistance participants qualify as “leveraged resources,” which will assist Local Areas in meeting the training expenditure requirement, as described in Directive WSD14-1.

55

http://www.edd.ca.gov/jobs_and_training/pubs/wsd16-04.pdf

http://www.edd.ca.gov/Jobs_and_Training/pubs/wsd14-1.pdf

of 2

If you have any questions regarding this information, please contact your assigned Regional Advisor.


1. PY 17-18 Rapid Response Funding Allocations

56



wsin17-03att1.xlsx

PY 2017-18 Rapid Reponse and Layoff Aversion Funding

Total07‐01‐2017 GC 540

10‐01‐2017 GC 541

Total GC 540/541

07‐01‐2017 GC 292

10‐01‐2017 GC 293

Total GC 292/293

PY 17‐18 Grand Total

Alameda 48,196$ 207,006$ 255,202$ 13,594$ 29,844$ 43,438$ 298,640$ Anaheim City 26,224$ 135,458$ 161,682$ 7,397$ 20,123$ 27,520$ 189,202$ Contra Costa 43,328$ 186,096$ 229,424$ 12,221$ 26,829$ 39,050$ 268,474$ Foothill 25,375$ 251,625$ 277,000$ 7,157$ 39,991$ 47,148$ 324,148$ Fresno 29,070$ 166,634$ 195,704$ 8,199$ 25,112$ 33,311$ 229,015$ Golden Sierra 33,068$ 176,327$ 209,395$ 9,326$ 26,315$ 35,641$ 245,036$ Humboldt 19,691$ 90,062$ 109,753$ 5,553$ 13,128$ 18,681$ 128,434$ Imperial 31,261$ 134,271$ 165,532$ 8,818$ 19,357$ 28,175$ 193,707$ Kern, Inyo, Mono 42,353$ 275,376$ 317,729$ 11,946$ 42,135$ 54,081$ 371,810$ Kings 20,001$ 116,075$ 136,076$ 5,641$ 17,521$ 23,162$ 159,238$ Los Angeles City 149,777$ 884,847$ 1,034,624$ 42,246$ 133,858$ 176,104$ 1,210,728$ Los Angeles County 165,705$ 1,520,178$ 1,685,883$ 46,738$ 240,217$ 286,955$ 1,972,838$ Long Beach/Pacific Gateway 70,623$ 303,331$ 373,954$ 19,919$ 43,732$ 63,651$ 437,605$ Madera 24,526$ 142,528$ 167,054$ 6,917$ 21,517$ 28,434$ 195,488$ Mendocino 17,468$ 88,883$ 106,351$ 4,927$ 13,175$ 18,102$ 124,453$ Merced 21,867$ 116,716$ 138,583$ 6,168$ 17,420$ 23,588$ 162,171$ Mother Lode 71,991$ 309,204$ 381,195$ 20,305$ 44,578$ 64,883$ 446,078$ Monterey 24,785$ 200,286$ 225,071$ 6,990$ 31,319$ 38,309$ 263,380$ North Bay 53,555$ 230,689$ 284,244$ 15,106$ 33,275$ 48,381$ 332,625$ North Central Counties 49,266$ 242,898$ 292,164$ 13,895$ 35,834$ 49,729$ 341,893$ NoRTEC 97,800$ 581,430$ 679,230$ 27,584$ 88,028$ 115,612$ 794,842$ NOVA‐San Mateo 193,357$ 830,483$ 1,023,840$ 54,537$ 119,731$ 174,268$ 1,198,108$ Oakland City 39,641$ 170,265$ 209,906$ 11,181$ 24,547$ 35,728$ 245,634$ Orange 109,849$ 471,809$ 581,658$ 30,983$ 68,021$ 99,004$ 680,662$ Richmond City 16,849$ 80,907$ 97,756$ 4,752$ 11,893$ 16,645$ 114,401$ Riverside 44,088$ 355,034$ 399,122$ 12,435$ 55,500$ 67,935$ 467,057$ Sacramento 43,361$ 459,261$ 502,622$ 12,230$ 73,322$ 85,552$ 588,174$ Santa Ana City 55,316$ 237,582$ 292,898$ 15,602$ 34,252$ 49,854$ 342,752$ Santa Barbara 31,594$ 162,141$ 193,735$ 8,911$ 24,065$ 32,976$ 226,711$ San Benito 15,526$ 82,230$ 97,756$ 4,379$ 12,260$ 16,639$ 114,395$ San Bernardino County 49,654$ 553,312$ 602,966$ 14,005$ 88,626$ 102,631$ 705,597$ South Bay 55,934$ 699,706$ 755,640$ 15,777$ 112,841$ 128,618$ 884,258$ Santa Cruz 17,946$ 86,973$ 104,919$ 5,062$ 12,796$ 17,858$ 122,777$ San Diego 169,251$ 726,944$ 896,195$ 47,737$ 104,805$ 152,542$ 1,048,737$ SELACO 17,468$ 123,084$ 140,552$ 4,927$ 18,996$ 23,923$ 164,475$ San Francisco 29,821$ 342,083$ 371,904$ 8,411$ 54,891$ 63,302$ 435,206$ San Joaquin 39,126$ 168,048$ 207,174$ 11,036$ 24,227$ 35,263$ 242,437$ San Jose ‐ Silicon Valley 98,937$ 424,937$ 523,874$ 27,905$ 61,264$ 89,169$ 613,043$ San Luis Obispo 31,225$ 134,113$ 165,338$ 8,807$ 19,335$ 28,142$ 193,480$ Solano 17,215$ 180,101$ 197,316$ 4,855$ 28,730$ 33,585$ 230,901$ Sonoma 21,381$ 229,834$ 251,215$ 6,030$ 36,729$ 42,759$ 293,974$ Stanislaus 26,838$ 193,577$ 220,415$ 7,570$ 29,947$ 37,517$ 257,932$ Tulare 22,027$ 138,939$ 160,966$ 6,213$ 21,185$ 27,398$ 188,364$ Verdugo 52,257$ 310,336$ 362,593$ 14,740$ 46,977$ 61,717$ 424,310$ Ventura 53,064$ 266,374$ 319,438$ 14,967$ 39,405$ 54,372$ 373,810$ Yolo 22,955$ 98,595$ 121,550$ 6,475$ 14,214$ 20,689$ 142,239$ Statewide Total 2,340,610$ 13,886,588$ 16,227,198$ 660,172$ 2,101,869$ 2,762,041$ 18,989,239$

Local AreaRapid Response Layoff Aversion

57

Date: August 10, 2017 Number: WSIN17-04


Page 1 of 1 50:102

DEAF AND HARD OF HEARING GRANTEES FOR 2017-18

The Employment Development Department (EDD) announces the awarding of five grants totaling $2,300,000 for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing (DHH) Program. The grants are funded by the Wagner-Peyser 10 Percent allocation. The awardees will assist deaf and hard of hearing persons to search for and obtain unsubsidized employment through the America’s Job Center of CaliforniaSM (AJCC) network. These awards provide services throughout California in 18 AJCC sites. A complete listing of each grant award, including project agency and description, award amounts, locations, and contact information, can be found at Workforce Services Solicitation For Proposal (SFP) under “Deaf and Hard of Hearing Services SFP 2017-18.” If you have questions or need additional information, please contact Gil Barkley, DHH Program Manager, at (916) 654-9309 or [email protected].

/S/ JAIME L. GUTIERREZ, Chief Central Office Workforce Services Division

58

http://www.edd.ca.gov/Jobs_and_Training/WDSFP_Workforce_Development_Solicitations_for_Proposals.htm

http://www.edd.ca.gov/Jobs_and_Training/WDSFP_Workforce_Development_Solicitations_for_Proposals.htm


WAGNER-PEYSER ACT DEAF and HARD of HEARING SERVICES PY 2017-18

DHH SFP PY 2017-18 Page 1 of 6

AWARD LIST AND PROJECT SUMMARIES

On July 13, 2017, $2,300,000 of Wagner-Peyser Act funding were awarded to five organizations under the Deaf and Hard of Hearing Services (DHH) for Program Year (PY) 2017-18 Solicitation for Proposals. Awardee project list and project summaries are listed below. Funding decisions are final.

PROJECT LIST

APPLICANT NAME COUNTY TOTAL AWARD

Deaf Community Services of San Diego, Inc. (DCS)

San Diego $370,810

Deaf Counseling, Advocacy & Referral Agency (DCARA) Alameda, Contra Costa, Del Norte, Humboldt, Lake, Marin, Mendocino,

Napa, San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Santa Cruz, Solano,

Sonoma $558,135

Deaf and Hard of Hearing Service Center (DHHSC) Fresno, Kings, Madera, Mariposa, Merced, Monterey, San Benito,

Tulare $125,000

Greater Los Angeles Agency on Deafness, Inc. (GLAD) Los Angeles $936,055

NorCal Services for Deaf, and Hard of Hearing (NorCAL) Sacramento, El Dorado, Placer, Nevada, Yolo, Sierra, Tehama, Trinity, Siskiyou, Shasta, Lassen, Modoc, San Joaquin, Alpine, Amador, Calaveras, Stanislaus, Tuolumne, Yuba, Sutter, Colusa, Butte, Glenn, Plumas

$310.000

TOTAL $2,300,000

PROJECT SUMMARIES See pages 2-6.

59


Project Summaries

APPLICANT Deaf Community Services of San Diego, Inc. (DCS)

1545 Hotel Circle South, Suite 300 San Diego, CA 92108

CONTACT Patricia Sieglen-Perry, Executive Director (619) 398-2441

AWARD $370,810

INDUSTRY FOCUS N/A

TARGETED PARTICIPANTS

All participants served by DCS

KEY PARTNERS N/A

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Deaf Community Services of San Diego, Inc. (DCS) will provide comprehensive employment and job-related services for Deaf and Hard of Hearing clients. These services will include client assessment, counseling, communications and job readiness preparation, as well as other duties toward job search planning and job placement. The DCS will also increase staffing to three for each of their current locations. The DCS operates at two AJCC's: South Central San Diego and Oceanside.

EXPECTED OUTCOMES

N/A

60


APPLICANT Deaf Counseling, Advocacy, and Referral Agency (DCARA) 14895 East 14th Street, Suite 200 San Leandro, CA 94578

CONTACT Raymond Rodgers, Executive Director 510 343-6672

AWARD $558,135

INDUSTRY FOCUS N/A


All participants served by DCARA

KEY PARTNERS N/A

PROJECT DESCRIPTION EXPECTED OUTCOMES

The Deaf Counseling, Advocacy and Referral Agency (DCARA) was awarded $558,135. The DCARA will provide employment services, comprehensive assessment, career guidance, employment counseling, job development and placement and retention assistance within the current five America's Job Center of California (AJCC) locations in Northern California. The services will be provided at the following AJCC's: San Francisco, Oakland, Fremont, North San Jose and Concord. N/A

61


APPLICANT Deaf and Hard of Hearing Service Center (DHHSC) 5340 N. Fresno Street Fresno, CA 93710

CONTACT Michelle Bronson, Executive Director 559-225-3323

AWARD $125,000

INDUSTRY FOCUS

N/A


All participants served by DHHSC

KEY PARTNERS

N/A

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The Deaf and Hard of Hearing Service Center of Fresno (DHHSC) will provide employment related services to the deaf and hard of hearing communities of the Central Valley. They have placed two staff at the Fresno West Workforce Services Center full-time to provide employment services, job search, counseling, community outreach and job placement activities.

EXPECTED OUTCOMES

N/A

62


APPLICANT Greater Los Angeles Agency on Deafness, Inc. (GLAD) 2222 Laverna Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90041-2625

CONTACT Dr. Patricia Hughes,

Chief Executive Office 323-892-2205

AWARD $936,055

INDUSTRY FOCUS

N/A


All participants served by GLAD

KEY PARTNERS

N/A

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The Greater Los Angeles Agency on Deaf, Inc. (GLAD) was awarded $936,055. The GLAD, Inc. will provide comprehensive job development and placement services including communication access for application/assessment, interviews, orientation and employer education at each of their EDD co-located sites. These services will be provided at eight America's Job Center of California: Los Angeles, Norwalk, Pacoima, West Covina, Riverside, Rancho Cucamonga, Santa Ana and Anaheim.

EXPECTED OUTCOMES

N/A

63


APPLICANT NorCal Services for Deaf and Hard of Hearing (NorCal) 4708 Roseville Road, Suite 111 North Highlands, CA 95660

CONTACT Sheri Farinha, Chief Executive Office 916-349-7500

AWARD $310,000

INDUSTRY FOCUS

N/A


All participants served by NorCal

KEY PARTNERS

N/A

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

NorCal will provide comprehensive job development and placement services to deaf and hard of hearing job seekers. All services will be fully accessible and provided in the preferred language or communication of the job, which include counseling, job search training, and follow-up for both the clients and employers. NorCal will provide all services described at two AJCC's: Sacramento Mark Sanders and Hillsdale which includes the counties of Sacramento, Placer, El Dorado and Yolo.

EXPECTED OUTCOMES

N/A

64

yolo county workforce innovation board - yoloworks.org agend… · yolo county workforce innovation...

Documents