yoshitaro takaesu u. of tokyo lhc limits on the higgs-portal wimps arxiv: 1407.6882 in collaboration...

Yoshitaro Takaesu U. of Tokyo

LHC limits on the Higgs-portal WIMPs

arXiv: 1407.6882 in collaboration with M. Endo (U.Tokyo)

Portal models to Hidden Sector

2

Consider another world where particles are SM singlets(Hidden Sector).

The particles interact to our SM world through Gravity.

Also, they may interact through…

DM ?

Neutrino Portal

Vector Portal

Axion Portal

Higgs Portal

Sterile neutrino

Dark Photon

Axino-like particle

Higgs invisible decay

SM HiddenG

In this talk, we discuss the Higgs-portal possibility.

Constraints on Higgs-portal models

3

• Relic abundance• Direct detection• Collider search

Tight constraints on Higgs-portal “DM”.

Still important to know to what extent LHC can explorethe heavier Higgs-portal models.

Heavy Higgs-portal WIMP search

[Simone, Giudice, Strumia: 1402.6287]

Need not to be the DM

4

Collider search for Heavy Higgs-portal WIMP

Higgs-portal models to be studied

5

Scalar

Vector

Anti-sym.Tensor

are SM singlets.

parity is assumed for and to ensure their stability.

after EWSB

Fermionic hidden particle is not considered for simplicity.

(SM singlet is stable without imposing parity by hand)

[A. Djouadi et al.1205.3169, S.Kanemura et al.1005.5651 ]

[O.Cata, A. Ibarra: 1404.0432]

Cross section of WIMP-pair production

6

We can express the WIMP pair production cross section as

This is the basic formulae for our analysis.

7

Experimental searches • VBF Higgs invisible decay• Mono-jet • Mono-Z

Searches for Higgs invisible decay at the LHC

8

Vector Boson Fusion (VBF)

BR_inv < 0.65 [CMS: 8TeV 19.5 fb^-1: 1404.1344]

Z associated production (ZH)

BR_inv < 0.75 [ATLAS: 8TeV 20.3 fb^-1: 1402.3244]

BR_inv < 0.81 [CMS: 8TeV 19.5 fb^-1: 1404.1344]

• Good S/B (Z-mass constraint, 2-lepton +missing)• Cross section is small (Useful at high luminosity)

• 2nd largest Higgs production process• Good S/B (large rapidity gap of 2 energetic forwarding jets)

Mono-X searches

9

Mono-X searches (X +missing pT) are also sensitive to Higgs-portal models.

Mono-jet

• Large Cross section• Main mono-X mode so far• S/B is not good• Gluon-fusion Higgs production

Mono-Z

• Same topology as ZH for Higgs-portal model

Mono-leptonMono-photonMono-topMono-Higgs etc …

VBF analysis (CMS , 1404.1344)

10

We calculate under the following cuts (w/ MCFM-6.8):

Compare to the upper bound on the signal events.

95% CL upper bound

11

8 TeV LHC constraints

Limits for the Heavy Higgs-portal WIMPs

12

Tensor Vector

Scalar

Data : BG VBF 390 : 332(58) Mono-jet 1772 : 1931(131) Mono-Z 45 : 52(18)

13

14 TeV LHC prospects

How to perform (rough) projection

14

We need to know and to estimate the 14 TeV constraints on .

is roughly estimated with the following assumptions:

95% CL (simple Gaussian)

Relative does not improve

Relative reduces as .

increases due to PDF (luminosity ratio) and integrated luminosity

is estimated by theoretical calculations with experimental cuts.

Tensor Vector Scalar0

2

4

6

8

10

12

Mono-J 8TeV 14TeV 400 (100) 400 (300) 600 (100) 600 (300)Mono-Z 8TeV 14TeV 450 (100) 450 (300)VBF 8TeV 14TeV (100)

Sensitivity Summary (Mono-j, VBF, Mono-Z)

15

MJ MZ VBF MJ MZ VBF MJ MZ VBF

* Rough Estimate

Tensor

MJ MZ VBF

16

SummaryLHC constraints on the Heavy Higgs-portal WIMP have been Studied.

8 TeV LHC results can access the Higgs-portal couplings below 1for the vector and tensor case. Scalar coupling limit is very weak.

14 TeV LHC can reach at O(0.1) couplings for vector and tensor case.The scalar coupling below O(1) will be remained unexplored.

VBF channel already shows good performance in 8 TeV LHC, replacing the mono-jet channel.ZH, Mono-Z channel will also be a important channel in 14 TeV LHC.

17

Backup Slides

Mono-jet analysis (CMS-PAS-EXO-12-048 )

18

We calculate under the following cuts (w/ MCFM-6.8):

• Taming the infinite top mass effects• Avoiding large region

giving the most stringent limit

(* 2nd jet with pT > 30 GeV (from NLO real emission) is not vetoed, due to technical reason. )

Mono-jet analysis

19

We would like to evaluate the cross section at least NLO QCD order.However, NLO cross sections are only known in limit.

We approximate the NLO cross section as

LO K-factor K-factor

[R.V.Handler et al. 1206.0157]

[L.Altenkamp et al. 1211.5015]

Mono-Z analysis (ATLAS , 1404.0051)

22

We calculate under the following cuts (w/ HAWK-2.0):

giving the most stringent limit

Mono-jet channel: 14 TeV LHC

23

Cross Sections at 14 TeV

Cx < 1 (100 1/fb)

Cx < 0.2 (100 1/fb)

Mono-Z channel: 14 TeV LHC

24

Cross Sections at 14 TeV

VBF and ZH channels

25

[5] ATLAS, 1402.3244[6] CMS, 1404.1344 [16] D.Gosh et al., 1211.7015[17] ATL-PHYS-PUB-2013-014 [18] Snowmass, 1309.7925

95% Upper bounds on the Higgs inv. decay ratio at mH = 125 GeV

The VBF bound will be improved by a factor of 4 at mH = 125 GeV.

The Upper bound on improves a factor of 2.

The ZH bound will be improved by a factor of 2 ~ 4 (300 1/fb) and 4 ~ 12 (3,000 1/fb).

The Upper bound on will be improved by a factor of 1.5 ~ 2 (300 1/fb) and 2 ~ 3.5 (3,000 1/fb).

If this level of improvement holds for any mH, the Upper bound on improves a factor of 4.

Profile-basedCut-based

Higgs production Cross Sections

Gluon-fusion

VBF

WH

ZH

36

How to estimate

38

archive

We will investigate the constraintsof the LHC invisible searcheson Heavier Higgs-portal WIMP models.

Mono-X searches

40

Mono-X searches (X +missing pT) are also sensitive to Higgs-portal models.

Mono-jet

• Large Cross section• Main mono-X mode so far• S/B is not good• Gluon-fusion Higgs production

Mono-Z

• Same topology as ZH for Higgs-portal model

Mono-lepton

• S/B is good• Cross section is small• Useful for high luminosity• WH production

Direct searches for Higgs invisible decay at the LHC

41


BR_inv < 0.65 [CMS: 8TeV 19.5 fb^-1: 1404.1344]



BR_inv < 0.81 [CMS: 8TeV 19.5 fb^-1: 1404.1344]

• Good S/B (Z-mass constraint, 2-lepton +missing)• Cross section is small• Useful for high luminosity


SM prediction:

Sizable BR_inv is an evidence of BSM models!

Mono-jet Sensitivity

42

Tensor Vector Scalar0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Mono-J 8TeV 14TeV 400 (100) 400 (3,000) 600 (100) 600 (3,000)VBF 8TeV 14TeV (100)ZH 8TeV 14TeV (300) 14TeV (3,000)

* Rough Estimate

Tensor


43

Tensor0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

1.6


* Rough Estimate

How to perform (theorist’s) projection

44



95% CL (simple Gaussian)

does not improve

reduces as

increases due to PDF (luminosity ratio) and integrated luminosity

is estimated by theoretical calculations with experimental cuts.

8TeV data

How to perform (theorist’s) projection

45



is estimated by theoretical calculations with cuts.

Searches for Higgs invisible decay at the LHC

46


BR_inv < 0.65 [CMS: 8TeV 19.5 fb^-1: 1404.1344]



BR_inv < 0.81 [CMS: 8TeV 19.5 fb^-1: 1404.1344]



SM prediction:

Sizable BR_inv is an evidence of BSM models


47

Upper bounds on the BR_inv have been obtained using invisible decay modes


BR_inv < 0.65 [CMS: 8TeV 19.5 fb^-1: 1404.1344]



BR_inv < 0.81 [CMS: 8TeV 19.5 fb^-1: 1404.1344]


• 2nd largest Higgs production process• Good S/B (large rapidity gap of 2 energetic forwarding jets)• Useful for high luminosity

Caveats:

Constraints on Higgs-portal DM models

48

• Relic abundance• Direct detection• Collider search

Tight constraints on Higgs-portal DM.Collider search is powerful, but

Heavy Higgs-portal WIMP

direct detection

Small abundance

Heavy Higgs inv. decay

[Simone, Giudice, Strumia: 1402.6287]

49

Constraints on Higgs-portal DM models• Relic abundance• Direct detection• Collider search

There are severe constraints on the Higgs-portal DM models. However, this is applicable only if the hidden particle is the dominant component of the DM.Not rule out less abundant components (Higgs-portal WIMPs) at the same level.

Collider WIMP searches is the right way for such possibilities.

50

Interpretation for Higgs-portal WIMPs

How about for Heavier Higgs-portal DMs?No explicit analysis.

We will try to re-interpret the direct Higgs invisible decay and mono-X limits for Heavier DM case.

51

Indirect searches for Higgs invisible decay

ATLAS-CONF-2013-034

The ATLAS and CMS collaborations have used the visible decay modes to infer limits on the invisible branching fraction of the 125 GeV Higgs boson:

• ATLAS: upper limit of 60% (ATLAS-CONF-2013-034)• CMS: upper limit of 64% (CMS-PAS-HIG-13-005)

52

Limits for the Heavy Higgs-portal WIMPs

Data : BG

VBF 390 : 332(58) Mono-jet 1772 : 1931(131) Mono-Z 45 : 52(18)

53


54

Tensor Sensitivity (Mono-j, VBF, Mono-Z)

Tensor0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

1.6

Mono-J 8TeV 14TeV 400 (100) 400 (300) 600 (100) 600 (300)Mono-Z 8TeV 14TeV 450 (100) 450 (300)VBF 8TeV 14TeV (100)14T

400100

* Rough Estimate

Mono-jet Mono-Z VBF

14T400300

14T600100

14T600300

8T45019.5

8T15020.3

14T450100

14T450300

8T12019.5

14T170100

55

Tensor Sensitivity (Mono-j, VBF, Mono-Z)

Tensor0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

1.6


* Rough Estimate

56

Higgs is more and more SM like

Is there any room for BSM physics in higgs property measurements?


57

Higgs is more and more SM like.But there are still room for New Physics.

Higgs invisible decay width still allows New Physics (NP) contributions a lot.

SM prediction is small:


58

Higgs width measurementsHiggs width is less constrained among Higgs properties.


59

Higgs is more and more SM like.But there are still room for New Physics.

Higgs invisible decay width is such a place:

[ATLAS: R.Harrinton @ICHEP’14] ]

[CMS:1312.53.53]

Higgs invisible decay width allows New Physics (NP) contributions.

SM prediction is small:


60

Cut-based vs. profile-based analysisIn this study, we re-interpret the latest cut-based results of 8 TeV LHC for each channel.

Cut-based analysis Profile-based analysis

Both analysis set limits on pp > chi chi +X (X = j, jj, Z, …) cross section, but profile-based analysis limits are depend on the topology, on-shell higgs production with m_H and its decay to DM pair.

61

Cut-based vs. profile-based analysisIn this study, we re-interpret the latest cut-based results of 8 TeV LHC for each channel.

Cut-based: • Use event numbers after experimental cuts (one-bin analysis)• Topology independent (only uses cross section information)• Weaker limits than profile-based analysis

Profile-based: • Use event distributions after experimental cuts (multi-bin analysis)• Topology dependent (distribution changes for different topologies)• Stronger limits than profile-based analysis

Both analysis set limits on pp > chi chi +X (X = j, jj, Z, …) cross section, but profile-based analysis limits are depend on the topology, on-shell higgs production with m_H and its decay to DM pair.

62

We use

Profile-based analysis put limits on the cross sec * BR and is depend on the higgs mass.

Need to convolute in the above integration for the heavy DMs.But those limits are limited up to m_H < 150 GeV.

Difficult to re-interpret profile-based limits.

So, we restrict our analysis to use only cut-based results: VBF, mono-jet, mono-Z searches.

Obtained constraints is conservative limits for the 8 TeV LHC.Profile-based analysis optimized to the heavy higgs-portal DMs will give more stringent constraints.

yoshitaro takaesu u. of tokyo lhc limits on the higgs-portal wimps arxiv: 1407.6882 in collaboration...

Documents