youth substance abuse issues: making alcohol, …r e p o r t a c r d 2 0 0 8 making alcohol,...
TRANSCRIPT
RE
P
OR T C A R D
2
00
8
Making alcohol, tobacco, and other drugs
irrelevant in the lives of youth.
Making alcohol, tobacco, and other drugs
irrelevant in the lives of youth.
Youth Substance Abuse Issues: Research and Legislation
Youth Substance Abuse Issues: Research and Legislation
IN
TR
OD
UC
TI
ON About the Report Card
C O N T E N T S
IntRoduCtIon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 1
texAnS StAndIng tALL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 2
PubLIC HeALtH & SAfetY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 6
envIRonmentAL PReventIon StRAtegIeS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page28
80tH texAS LegISLAtuRe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page38
CReAtIng CommunItY CHAnge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page46
About the cover: In January of 2008, texans Standing tall updated
its mission and vision statements and launched a new logo that
we believe speaks more clearly to the comprehensive and
collaborative nature of the work we do throughout the state.
© Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l I n c . R E P O RT C A R D 2 0 0 8 w w w. Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l . o r g
IN
TR
OD
UC
TI
ON About the Report Card
© Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l I n c . R E P O RT C A R D 2 0 0 8 w w w. Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l . o r g 1
This year, 2008, marks the third year for Texans Standing Tall
Statewide Coalition to release an annual Report Card and host a
series of Regional Policy Forums across Texas. In that time, Texans Standing Tall (TST)
has increased the number of Regional Policy Forums held and distributed more than
1,000 Report Cards each year.
The Report Card has been met with overwhelming support and utilized as a prevention
resource by people from all sectors of the community. Based on feedback from community
members, TST developed a presentation of the Report Card 2007 that was presented
during the 2008 Regional Policy Forums. Additionally, community members and leaders
were trained on how to utilize the presentation and Report Card to educate and engage
people in efforts to prevent underage alcohol, tobacco, and other drug use.
The Report Card 2008 includes information on current research including the Surgeon
General’s report, The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke,
and a report from the Institute of Alcohol Studies in London on binge drinking in
European countries. It also provides an overview of the Regional Policy Forums,
statewide youth and college-aged substance use and consequence trends, information
on how Texas compares with other states on implementation of evidence-based
environmental prevention strategies for public health and safety issues, and reports
on Texas Legislature Interim Studies that relate to youth substance use and safety issues.
It concludes with highlights on two success stories of population-based, environmental
change.
The Regional Policy Forums and Report Card are made possible through federal grant
funding from the Drug Free Communities (DFC) Support Program of the Substance
Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), support from regional
partners throughout Texas, and Texans Standing Tall.
Please note that throughout this Report Card the words “youth” and “underage” are
used interchangeably because junior high students, not only high school seniors and college
freshman, use alcohol – the average age for a student to first use alcohol in Texas is 12.2.
Report on Regional forums
Te
xa
Ns
s
Ta
ND
IN
g
Ta
ll
© Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l I n c . R E P O RT C A R D 2 0 0 8 w w w. Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l . o r g 2
Report on Regional forums
In 2006, Texans Standing Tall (TST) organized Regional Policy Forums throughout the
state, in partnership with local community coalitions. Forums were originally held in
Houston, Dallas, San Antonio, Midland, and El Paso. In 2007, Forums were again held in
those five cities, with an additional Forum in Lufkin. This year a location was added in
Austin, making the total number of Regional Policy Forums seven in 2008, three of which
are self-sustaining.
The Forums bring together local and state level participants to mobilize them in a
coordinated, strategic way to effect change at local and state levels on youth prevention
issues. At each Forum, community members learn about evidence-based environmental
prevention strategies as well as local and statewide substance abuse issues, participate in
strategic planning activities, and are mobilized to take action on different statewide and
local strategies each year. Because alcohol is the substance most used by youth in Texas,
the Regional Policy Forums give particular attention to preventing youth alcohol use.
Feedback from the 2007 Forums indicated a desire by participants to be trained in
utilizing the TST Report Card as a community advocacy tool. TST integrated
presentations based around the Report Card into the Regional Forums, not only as an
education piece for participants, but as a model of how to best utilize the Report Card
locally. State-level speakers presented on each section of the Report Card 2007:
Surgeon General’s Call to Action on Underage Drinking, Report on Regional Forums,
Statistics and Trends on Youth Substance Use, Drug Demand Reduction Advisory
Counsel (DDRAC) Policy Recommendations, Environmental Prevention Strategies, and
the Overview of the 80th Legislative Session as it related to youth substance use.
Additionally, a breakout session was provided to teach interested participants how
to present the Report Card 2007. Each participant received a CD with the Report Card
2007 PowerPoint presentation and a script.
Te
xa
Ns
s
Ta
ND
IN
g
Ta
ll Report on Regional forums
© Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l I n c . R E P O RT C A R D 2 0 0 8 w w w. Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l . o r g 3
Creating Community Change: Surgeon general’s Call to Action on underage drinking
In January 2007, the Acting Surgeon General Kenneth Moritsugu, M.D., M.P.H., issued
a Call to Action to Prevent and Reduce Underage Drinking asking all Americans to
take action to reduce underage drinking. The Call to Action laid out six general goals,
developed in cooperation with the National Institute on Alcoholism (NIAAA) and the
Substance Abuse Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). They are:
1. Foster changes in society that facilitate healthy adolescent development and that help
prevent and reduce underage drinking.
2. Engage parents, schools, communities, all levels of government, all social systems that
interface with youth, and youth themselves in a coordinated national effort to prevent
and reduce underage drinking and its consequences.
3. Promote an understanding of underage alcohol consumption in the context of
human development and maturation that takes into account individual adolescent
characteristics as well as environmental, ethnic, cultural, and gender differences.
4. Conduct additional research on adolescent alcohol use and its relationship to development.
5. Work to improve public health surveillance on underage drinking and on
population-based risk factors for this behavior.
6. Work to ensure that policies at all levels are consistent with the national goal of
preventing and reducing underage alcohol consumption.
The first Forum of 2008 was held in Houston on January 24th, and Dr. Hamilton Beazley,
Scholar-in-Residence at St. Edward’s University and Science Writer for the Surgeon
General’s Report, gave a “Call to Action” presentation about the research and
community solutions in the report. Nicole Holt, Executive Director of Texans Standing
Tall, gave the presentation at each of the remaining Forums.
The Surgeon General’s Call to Action can be viewed at:
http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/topics/underagedrinking/.
Te
xa
Ns
s
Ta
ND
IN
g
Ta
ll
© Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l I n c . R E P O RT C A R D 2 0 0 8 w w w. Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l . o r g 4
Report on Regional forums
focus on an environmental Strategy:Alcoholic energy drinks
Another highlighted issue was alcoholic energy drinks - prepackaged, sweet beverages
containing alcohol, caffeine, and other stimulants. The drinks are built on the popularity of
non-alcoholic energy drinks, and because they are categorized as malt beverages they
can be purchased anywhere beer is sold. This creates an easier to get and cheaper
alternative to buying the products separately and creating a mixed drink. The marketing
tactics employed for alcoholic energy drinks appeal largely to the youth market. They are
heavily advertised through viral marketing and on the Internet with flashy, youthful-
looking websites.
The packaging of alcoholic energy drinks looks very similar to those that contain no
alcohol. This packaging makes it more difficult for retailers, clerks, and parents to tell the
difference between the alcoholic energy drinks and the nonalcoholic versions. Underage
use of these drinks leads to many dangerous consequences. One of the most notable
is the creation of the “wide-awake drunk.” Youth do not feel the sedating effects of
alcohol the same as adults; the addition of a stimulant only makes that worse, masking
the sensation of drunkenness. This can lead to dangerous behaviors such as alcohol
poisoning, drunk driving, and other risky behaviors.
Te
xa
Ns
s
Ta
ND
IN
g
Ta
ll Report on Regional forums
© Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l I n c . R E P O RT C A R D 2 0 0 8 w w w. Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l . o r g 5
SUBSTANCE EASY/FAirlY EASY HArD/VErY HArD
Alcohol 75% 4.7%
Tobacco 63.9% 6.9%
Other Drugs 67.2% 1.8%
Participant Perceptions of Youth Access to Drugs
evaluation of Region forums
TST conducts a comprehensive evaluation of the Forums to gauge the impact, knowledge
transfer, participant demographics, and perceptions and attitudes regarding alcohol,
tobacco, and other drug issues in the participant’s community. Research and Educational
Services (REdS) of Houston professionally administers all evaluation tools, which include:
Pre/Post Tests, Training Evaluation Survey, and a Community Assessment Survey.
TST is proud to report that the Regional Policy Forum model has proven successful in
educating and mobilizing Texans for community-level and statewide change. Results from
evaluations indicate that people leave the Forums more knowledgeable about youth
substance abuse issues and prevention strategies that can best address them. Results
from the 2008 Training Evaluation Survey of all Forum participants indicated the following:
• 91% of participants reported increased understanding of environmental strategies;
• 92% of participants reported increased understanding of advocacy; and
• 92% of participants reported increased understanding of how to achieve social change.
The Community Assessment Survey measures adult perception and behavior around
alcohol, tobacco, and other drug use in their community, and it is administered to each
Forum participant. In 2008, 93.9% of respondents stated that they believe there is an
alcohol or drug problem in their city. This is compared to 95% in 2007. Other results from
this year include: 74.8% believed that not enough attention was being given to the
alcohol or other drug problem in their community, and only 25.2% believed sufficient
attention was being given to the problem. The following chart indicates Community
Assessment Survey results on perception of availability of alcohol, tobacco, and other
drugs to youth in the participant’s community.
PU
Bl
IC
H
ea
lT
H
&
sa
Fe
TY overview of Research
© Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l I n c . R E P O RT C A R D 2 0 0 8 w w w. Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l . o r g 6
Surgeon general’s Report: Health Consequences of Involuntary exposure to tobacco Smoke
In June of 2006, the United States Department of Health and Humans Services (DHHS)
led by the Surgeon General, Vice Admiral Richard H. Carmona, M.D., M.P.H, FACS,
released a comprehensive scientific report on the dangers of involuntary exposure to
secondhand smoke.
The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke estimates that
126 million children and adults are exposed to secondhand smoke each year. Through
scientific studies led by the DHHS, this report outlines the negative effects secondhand
smoke has on the natural environment, pregnant mothers, infants, children, and adults.
The report also notes the direct relationship between secondhand smoke and the
increased risk of cancer and coronary heart disease. From the data collected, the report
summarizes six major conclusions:
1. Secondhand smoke causes premature death and disease in children and in adults
who do not smoke.
2. Children exposed to secondhand smoke are at an increased risk for sudden infant
death syndrome (SIDS), acute respiratory infections, ear problems, and more severe
asthma. Smoking by parents causes respiratory symptoms and slows lung growth in
their children.
3. Exposure of adults to secondhand smoke has immediate adverse effects on the
cardiovascular system, causes coronary heart disease and lung cancer.
4. The scientific evidence indicates that there is no risk-free level of exposure to
secondhand smoke.
5. Many millions of Americans, both children and adults, are still exposed to
secondhand smoke in their homes and workplaces despite substantial progress
in tobacco control.
6. Eliminating smoking in indoor spaces is the only way to fully protect nonsmokers from
exposure to secondhand smoke. Separating smokers from nonsmokers, cleaning
the air, and ventilating buildings does not eliminate exposure of nonsmokers to
secondhand smoke.
PU
Bl
IC
H
ea
lT
H
&
sa
Fe
TY overview of Research
© Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l I n c . R E P O RT C A R D 2 0 0 8 w w w. Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l . o r g 7
The future of protecting ourselves from secondhand smoke can be best summarized
from a statement issued by Surgeon General Vice Admiral Carmona:
An important new conclusion of this Report is that smoke-free environments are the ONLY approach that effectively protects nonsmokers from the dangers of second-hand smoke. The 1986 Surgeon General’s Report concluded that the simple separa-tion of smokers and nonsmokers within the same air space may reduce, but does not eliminate, secondhand smoke exposure among nonsmokers. The current Report expands on that finding by concluding that even sophisticated ventilation approaches cannot completely remove secondhand smoke from an indoor space. Because there is no risk-free level of secondhand smoke exposure, anything less cannot ensure that nonsmokers are fully protected from the dangers of exposure to secondhand smoke.
A Comparison of european Countries and the united States: Youth drinking Rates
The legal age to purchase alcohol varies across Europe. According to the International
Center for Alcohol Policies, the legal age to purchase alcohol is 16 in France, Belgium,
and Spain and 18 in the United Kingdom, Switzerland, and Ireland. In Germany, wine and
beer can be purchased at age 16, but the minimum age to purchase distilled spirits is 18.
There is a perception among some people that American youth engage in high-risk drinking
and experience more alcohol-related problems than do their European counterparts. This
perception is often mentioned by supporters of changing the U.S. minimum legal drinking
age. Prevailing research does not demonstrate that lowering the drinking age results in less
youth alcohol consumption, risky drinking, or associated negative consequences.
The U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
(OJJDP), produced a report in 2005 that compared American youth with their European
counterparts. The OJJDP report compared results from the European School Survey
Project on Alcohol and Other Drugs (ESSPAOD) with the annual Monitoring the Future
Survey (MTF) from the United States. Among the findings were:
• Young people from nearly all European countries report a greater percentage
of drinking in the past 30 days than American youth. In the Monitoring the Future
survey, 35% of U.S. 10th Graders report drinking in the past 30 days. Among their
PU
Bl
IC
H
ea
lT
H
&
sa
Fe
TY overview of Research
© Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l I n c . R E P O RT C A R D 2 0 0 8 w w w. Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l . o r g 8
European counterparts, 74% of 15-16-year olds in the United Kingdom report drinking
over the previous 30 days, according to the ESSPAOD survey. In France, the past-month
drinking rate among 15-16-year olds was 58%, while in Germany it was 78%.
• In many European countries, a greater percentage of young people report having
five or more drinks in a row, meeting the criteria for binge drinking. In the MTF
Survey, 22% of U.S. 10th graders report binge drinking on one occasion in the past
month. In France, the rate of binge drinking among 15-16-year olds was reported to be
28%, while in the United Kingdom it was 54%.
• A majority of European countries have higher intoxication rates than the United
States; less than a quarter have intoxication rates lower or equivalent to the U.S. In the
MTF survey, American 10th graders reported drinking to an intoxication level in the past
30 days at a rate of 18%. In the ESSPAOD survey, the United Kingdom rate for self-reported
intoxication among 15-16-year olds was 46%, while it was 35% in Germany.
In early 2008, a report was released on behalf of the Institute of Alcohol Studies in
London entitled Binge Drinking and Europe. The report was an in-depth look at the
scale of binge drinking in Europe and the harm it causes. For this study binge drinking
was defined at 5 or more drinks on a single occasion. The report identified:
• 24% of Europeans age 15-24 reported binge drinking at least once a week.
• 18% of youth age 15-16 reported having had 5+ drinks on a single occasion three times
or more in the last month.
• Across the European Union, more than 1 in 8 (13%) of 15-16-year-old students have
been drunk more than 20 times in their life.
Health and Safety Consequences of underage drinking
The previous consumption data illustrate that a lower legal drinking age does not always
correlate with a decrease in high-risk drinking among underage youth. It is commonly
known that underage alcohol use contributes to unintentional death, suicide, and injury,
but the Surgeon General’s Call to Action identifies other consequences of underage
drinking. These include:
• Risky sexual behavior, including unwanted, unintended, and unprotected sexual activity
and sex with multiple partners, which increases the risk for unplanned pregnancy and
for contracting STDs.
PU
Bl
IC
H
ea
lT
H
&
sa
Fe
TY overview of Research
© Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l I n c . R E P O RT C A R D 2 0 0 8 w w w. Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l . o r g 9
• Increased risk of physical and sexual assault.
• Increased risk of academic failure.
• Increased risk of alcoholism and heavy drinking later in life.
• Correlated incidence of tobacco and illicit drug use.
• Physical consequences from hangovers to death by alcohol poisoning.
• Secondhand effects that put others who are not drinking at risk. Examples include
unruly behavior, property destruction, unintentional injuries, violence, and death.
According to Binge Drinking and Europe: Recommendations and Conclusions, a 2008
report by the German Centre for Disease Addiction Issues, each year in the European
Union alcohol consumption, particularly binge drinking, is related to:
• 2,000 homicides (4 in 10 of all murders).
• 17,000 alcohol-related motor vehicle fatalities (1 in 3 of all traffic fatalities), including
10,000 deaths of people other than the impaired driver.
• 27,000 accidental deaths.
• 10,000 suicides (1 in 6 of all suicides).
• 16% of all child abuse/neglect.
• 5-9 million children living in families adversely affected by alcohol.
In the RAND Corporation’s publication Preventing Underage Drinking: Using Getting
to Outcomes™ with the SAMHSA Strategic Prevention Framework to Achieve Results, they
note a study from New Zealand, where in 1999 the legal age to purchase alcohol was
lowered from age 20 to age 18. The study noted that since that time, the rate of alcohol-
related traffic crashes among 18-19-year-old males increased by 12%, and the rate among
15-17-year-old males increased by 15%. Even more disturbing, alcohol-related crash
rates among females rose even more sharply with a 51% increase among those
age 18 and 19 and by 24% among 15-17-year-olds.
PU
Bl
IC
H
ea
lT
H
&
sa
Fe
TY overview of Substance Abuse in texas: Secondary School
© Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l I n c . R E P O RT C A R D 2 0 0 8 w w w. Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l . o r g 1 0
A key purpose of the TST annual Report Card is to document the current
state of youth substance abuse in Texas, focusing on key factors and analyzing specific trends.
Underage drinking costs the state of Texas more than $5.2 billion a year. This
number includes, but is not limited to, such expenses as uninsured medical costs,
property damage, loss of life, fetal alcohol syndrome as well as the cost of treatment for
alcohol-related medical problems (Pacific Institute of Research & Evaluation, 2005).
According to the latest research from the Center For Disease Control (CDC), 21.1% of
Texas youth are smoking today. It is estimated that 35,900 more youth will take up
smoking in 2008, and that eventually 503,000 Texas youth alive today will die from smoking.
The following section of the Report Card 2008 will take a look at secondary school and collegiate
data reflecting trends in substance use, as well as comparing DPS arrest data from 2000 to
2007 to look at other trends involving male-female use of alcohol and its consequences.
middle School/High School Students The latest Texas School Survey on Substance Abuse Among Students Grades 7-12 (2006)
from the Department of State Health Services (DSHS) offers insight into the scope of the
problem of youth substance abuse in Texas.
Alcohol and tobacco are considered “gateway” drugs because their early use is a
predictor that an adolescent will try other substances. It stands to reason, therefore,
that strategies that change the community environment to reduce underage alcohol
and tobacco use will therefore reduce the use of other drugs as well. The following chart
shows the average age of first use for alcohol, tobacco, and marijuana, comparing data
from 2004 with data from 2006.
SUBSTANCE 2004 2006
Alcohol 12.4 years of age 12.2 years of age
Tobacco 12.5 years of age 12.7 years of age
Marijuana 13.5 years of age 13.5 years of age
Comparison of Average Age of First Use by Substance
PU
Bl
IC
H
ea
lT
H
&
sa
Fe
TY overview of Substance Abuse in texas: Secondary School
© Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l I n c . R E P O RT C A R D 2 0 0 8 w w w. Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l . o r g 1 1
Long-Term Trends of Use
Alcohol continues to be the most widely abused substance among students, with 65.9%
of Texas secondary students reporting that they had used alcohol at some point in their
lives, while 31.5% reporting that they used alcohol in the last month.
The following charts demonstrate both long-term (1990-2006) and short-term (2004-2006)
trends in substance abuse among Texas secondary school students.
Long-Term Trends of Use
EVEr USED 1990 2006 % oF CHANgE
Alcohol 81.0% 65.9% -18.6%
Tobacco 56.2% 35.4% -37.0%
Marijuana 22.6% 26.4% +16.8%
PAST MoNTH USE 1990 2006 % oF CHANgE
Alcohol 43.6% 31.5% -27.8%
Tobacco 22.9% 15.2% -33.6%
Marijuana 7.8% 11.0% +41.0%
Short-Term Trends of Use
EVEr USED 2004 2006 % oF CHANgE
Alcohol 67.9% 65.9% -3.0%
Tobacco 39.4% 35.4% -10.2%
Marijuana 29.8% 26.4% -11.4%
PAST MoNTH USE 2004 2006 % oF CHANgE
Alcohol 32.6% 31.5% -3.4%
Tobacco 17.0% 15.2% -10.6%
Marijuana 12.6% 11.0% -12.7%
PU
Bl
IC
H
ea
lT
H
&
sa
Fe
TY
© Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l I n c . R E P O RT C A R D 2 0 0 8 w w w. Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l . o r g 1 2
As can be seen from these numbers, there are many positive trends. Youth alcohol and
tobacco use has dropped significantly both in the long-term and short-term. Although
the long-term trends of marijuana use remain statistically high, the short-term numbers
reveal that this trend has been reversing. We must ensure that current positive trends
continue. Positive trends are also apparent in more specific areas:
• In 2006, 9.2 % of secondary students said they had attended class while drunk at least
once during the past school year, down from 10% in 2004.
• Binge drinking, defined as having five or more drinks in one sitting for boys and four
or more drinks in one sitting for girls, was reported by 21.9% of the students in 2006.
This is down from 23% in 2004.
• In 2006, 21.2% of high school seniors said that they had driven a car after having
several drinks at least once during the past year. This is down from 24% in 2004.
Alcohol continues to be viewed as the easiest of the substances to get, although this
perception has decreased somewhat over the past few years, as illustrated in the chart below.
Somewhat/Very Easy to Get
2004 2006 % oF CHANgE
Alcohol 67.8% 66.9% -1.3%
Tobacco 61.2% 58.4% -4.6%
Marijuana 44.3% 41.6% -6.1%
overview of Substance Abuse in texas: Secondary School
The report also sheds light on how secondary school students are obtaining alcohol,
as indicated below.
Sources of Alcohol for Secondary School Students
At Parties 65%
From Friends 58%
At Home 19%
At A Store 19%
From Another Source 38%
PU
Bl
IC
H
ea
lT
H
&
sa
Fe
TY
© Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l I n c . R E P O RT C A R D 2 0 0 8 w w w. Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l . o r g 1 3
These data show that efforts to reduce underage drinking have shown success in
terms of youth obtaining alcohol from stores and from home. However, there is
considerable room for improvement regarding youth obtaining alcohol socially
at parties and from friends.
The data presented in the report show that efforts to reduce youth substance abuse have
had a positive impact over the past 16 years. Still, the rates of youth substance abuse remain
unacceptably high, underlying the need for even more use of effective strategies.
overview of Substance Abuse in texas: Secondary School
PU
Bl
IC
H
ea
lT
H
&
sa
Fe
TY
© Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l I n c . R E P O RT C A R D 2 0 0 8 w w w. Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l . o r g 1 4
Long-term trends of Youth male-female drinking
Since its inception in 1990, the Texas School Survey on Substance Abuse Among
Students Grades 7-12 has shown a downward trend for lifetime use and past-month
use for both male and female students. However, in recent years the trend has slowed
dramatically for girls, and they now have a higher rate of alcohol use than their male
counterparts in grades 7-12.
overview of Substance Abuse in texas: Secondary School
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006
Boys 81.6% 77.5% 75.0% 73.7% 72.1% 70.9% 70.6% 66.5% 64.2%
Girls 80.5% 73.9% 73.5% 72.9% 72.2% 70.6% 71.3% 69.3% 67.5%
Texas School Survey Grades 7-12: Lifetime Alcohol Use
From 1990 to 2006, youth male lifetime use of alcohol among Texas secondary students
dropped 21.3%. Meanwhile, lifetime use of alcohol among female secondary students
dropped 16.1% from 1990 to 2006.
Percentage of Texas Secondary Students Who Used Alcohol in the Past Month, by Gender: 1990-2006
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006
Boys Girls
Percentage of Texas Secondary Students Who Had Ever Used Alcohol, by Gender: 1990-2006
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006
Boys Girls
PU
Bl
IC
H
ea
lT
H
&
sa
Fe
TY
© Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l I n c . R E P O RT C A R D 2 0 0 8 w w w. Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l . o r g 1 5
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006
Boys 45.3% 38.6% 40.8% 37.7% 39.2% 37.3% 34.9% 32.5% 31.4%
Girls 42.1% 35.6% 38.1% 37.0% 36.9% 35.0% 34.1% 32.7% 31.5%
Texas School Survey Grades 7-12: Past Month Alcohol Use
From 1990 to 2006, the Texas School Survey on Substance Abuse Among Students
Grades 7-12 reports that past-month use among Texas male secondary students
dropped 30.7%. The rate for Texas female secondary students for past-month alcohol
use dropped 25.2%, demonstrating that girls are now drinking more than boys.
overview of Substance Abuse in texas: Secondary School
This decade also saw the first time when females in grades 7-12 passed their male
counterparts in past-month use of alcohol.
Percentage of Texas Secondary Students Who Used Alcohol in the Past Month, by Gender: 1990-2006
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006
Boys Girls
Percentage of Texas Secondary Students Who Had Ever Used Alcohol, by Gender: 1990-2006
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006
Boys Girls
PU
Bl
IC
H
ea
lT
H
&
sa
Fe
TY
© Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l I n c . R E P O RT C A R D 2 0 0 8 w w w. Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l . o r g 1 6
In the spring of 1997, the Texas Commission on Alcohol and Drug
Abuse, now a part of the Texas Department of State Health Services, collaborated with
the Public Policy Research Institute (PPRI) of Texas A&M University to conduct a
telephone survey of substance use and related behaviors among full-time
undergraduate students in Texas aged 18-26.
In the spring of 2005, the Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS), also in
conjunction with PPRI, conducted a follow-up survey of substance use and related
behaviors among full-time undergraduate students in Texas aged 18-26. The following
reviews some of the information revealed by the two studies.
Pattern of Substance use
In both surveys, alcohol was the number one substance that college students reported
using. A comparison of the two surveys also shows that lifetime use of tobacco products
increased by 15% since 1997, and lifetime use of cigarettes by Texas college students
increased by 21% between 1997 and 2005.
SUBSTANCE liFETiME USE PAST MoNTH liFETiME USE PAST MoNTH
Alcohol 88% 69% 84% 66%
Tobacco 45% 26% 52% 28%
Cigarettes 42% 24% 51% 26%
Marijuana 29% 11% 37% 11%
Cocaine/Crack 5% 1% 9% 1%
Alcohol (age 18-20) 83% 60% 78% 58%
Patterns of Use: 1997 2005
overview of Substance Abuse in texas: College
PU
Bl
IC
H
ea
lT
H
&
sa
Fe
TY
© Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l I n c . R E P O RT C A R D 2 0 0 8 w w w. Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l . o r g 1 7
demographic factors
Both the 1997 and the 2005 Texas Surveys of Substance Abuse Among University Students
took a look at the relationship between demographic factors and substance use.
SUBSTANCE liFETiME USE PAST YEAr PAST MoNTH MAlE / FEMAlE MAlE / FEMAlE MAlE / FEMAlE
Alcohol 88.3% / 86.6% 82.0% / 81.7% 72.5% / 66.1%
Tobacco 51.7% / 39.0% 40.8% / 29.1% 31.9% / 20.5%
Marijuana 34.0% / 24.7% 22.5% / 13.5% 14.9% / 7.1%
Prevalence and Recency of Substance Abuse Among College Students by Gender: 1997
SUBSTANCE liFETiME USE PAST YEAr PAST MoNTH MAlE / FEMAlE MAlE / FEMAlE MAlE / FEMAlE
Alcohol 85.1% / 83.6% 79.3% / 77.8% 68.3% / 63.6%
Tobacco 58.0% / 47.1% 45.1% / 33.0% 32.2% / 22.2%
Marijuana 40.6% / 33.5% 25.0% / 17.6% 15.3% / 7.4%
According to the two surveys, alcohol use among college students is down slightly
across the board. Meanwhile, the number of students who admit to trying tobacco
products and marijuana at some point in their lifetime are up substantially. Past-year and
past-month use of both substances are up as well.
SUBSTANCE liFETiME USE PAST YEAr PAST MoNTH 18-20 / 21-26 18-20 / 21-26 18-20 / 21-26
Alcohol 82.7% / 91.9% 77.3% / 86.2% 60.1% / 77.8%
Tobacco 41.0% / 49.3% 34.0% / 35.9% 24.7% / 27.5%
Marijuana 24.5% / 33.8% 17.6% / 18.4% 10.8% / 11.1%
Prevalence and Recency of Substance Abuse Among College Students by Gender: 2005
Prevalence and Recency of Substance Abuse Among College Students by Age: 1997
overview of Substance Abuse in texas: College
PU
Bl
IC
H
ea
lT
H
&
sa
Fe
TY
© Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l I n c . R E P O RT C A R D 2 0 0 8 w w w. Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l . o r g 1 8
SUBSTANCE liFETiME USE PAST YEAr PAST MoNTH 18-20 / 21-26 18-20 / 21-26 18-20 / 21-26
Alcohol 78.1% / 90.5% 71.7% / 85.3% 57.6% / 73.7%
Tobacco 44.2% / 59.4% 33.9% / 42.6% 23.9% / 32.4%
Marijuana 30.3% / 42.8% 20.2% / 21.3% 10.4% / 11.0%
Alcohol use by college students, both underage and those of age, is down across the
board according to the two surveys. Tobacco use is up for lifetime use for both age
groups, while past-year and past-month use are down for the18-20 age group.
The 21-26 age group reports a 20.5% increase in the lifetime use of tobacco products
while showing almost 20% increases in past-year and past-month use of tobacco
products. Both age groups report an increase of lifetime and past-year use of marijuana,
while past-month use is stable.
SUBSTANCE liFETiME USE PAST YEAr PAST MoNTH NoN-grEEk / grEEk NoN-grEEk / grEEk NoN-grEEk / grEEk
Alcohol 86.7% / 92.1% 80.6% / 89.3% 67.3% / 80.2%
Tobacco 43.3% / 56.5% 32.9% / 46.7% 24.8% / 33.5%
Marijuana 28.4% / 34.1% 17.4% / 21.6% 10.6% / 13.2%
SUBSTANCE liFETiME USE PAST YEAr PAST MoNTH NoN-grEEk / grEEk NoN-grEEk / grEEk NoN-grEEk / grEEk
Alcohol 83.6% / 89.6% 77.8% / 83.8% 64.8% / 71.6%
Tobacco 51.4% / 54.6% 37.7% / 42.1% 27.7% / 31.5%
Marijuana 36.2% / 39.0% 20.4% / 23.2% 10.7% / 11.4%
Prevalence and Recency of Substance Abuse Among College Students by Age: 2005
Prevalence and Recency of Substance Abuse Among College Students by Fraternity/Sorority: 1997
Prevalence and Recency of Substance Abuse Among College Students by Fraternity/Sorority: 2005
overview of Substance Abuse in texas: College
PU
Bl
IC
H
ea
lT
H
&
sa
Fe
TY
© Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l I n c . R E P O RT C A R D 2 0 0 8 w w w. Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l . o r g 1 9
Alcohol use among college students both within the Greek system (fraternities and
sororities) and outside the Greek system is down slightly. Meanwhile tobacco use among
Non-Greek college students increased dramatically, while students within the Greek
system saw a decline across the board. Lifetime use among college students not in the
Greek system rose 18.7%. Past-year use of tobacco products among students not in a
fraternity/sorority rose 14.6% and past month use rose 11.7%. Tobacco use among
students in the Greek system dropped in all three categories.
SUBSTANCE liFETiME USE PAST YEAr PAST MoNTH $0-20k / $20-60k / $60k+ $0-20k / $20-60k / $60k+ $0-20k / $20-60k / $60k+
Alcohol 84.0% / 86.7% / 89.0% 72.1% / 80.2% / 85.2% 57.4%/ 65.5% / 75.0%
Tobacco 35.6% / 41.2% / 51.4% 27.1% / 31.0% / 40.1% 19.8%/ 23.5%/ 30.0%
Marijuana 24.2% / 24.3% / 36.1% 14.1% / 14.6% / 22.4% 8.1%/ 9.2% / 13.3%
In comparing the two surveys, the trend of alcohol use among college students
remained fairly stable across all parental household income groups, but students with
higher parental annual incomes have a higher rate of past-month alcohol use.
For tobacco use among college students, there are dramatic increases in almost all of
the categories when broken down by parental household income but with the opposite
effect of alcohol. For instance, lifetime tobacco use among college students in the
lower income bracket (0-20K) is up 40.1%. Past year use for this category is also up
40.5%. Past month use of tobacco products for this income bracket is up 32.3% from
1997 to 2005. The middle income bracket (20-60K) shows an increase of 22.3% for
SUBSTANCE liFETiME USE PAST YEAr PAST MoNTH $0-20k / $20-60k / $60k+ $0-20k / $20-60k / $60k+ $0-20k / $20-60k / $60k+
Alcohol 77.9% / 84.8% / 88.8% 72.3% / 78.1% / 84.6% 59.3% / 63.2% / 74.6%
Tobacco 49.9% / 50.4% / 58.7% 38.1% / 34.2% / 45.0% 26.2% / 27.6% / 32.5%
Marijuana 35.7% / 37.5% / 41.0% 18.3% / 19.2% / 25.8% 10.0% / 10.9% / 13.2%
Prevalence and Recency of Substance Abuse Among College Students by Parental Annual Household Income: 1997
Prevalence and Recency of Substance Abuse Among College Students by Parental Annual Household Income: 2005
overview of Substance Abuse in texas: College
PU
Bl
IC
H
ea
lT
H
&
sa
Fe
TY
© Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l I n c . R E P O RT C A R D 2 0 0 8 w w w. Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l . o r g 2 0
ToTAl MAlE FEMAlE AgE 18-20
29% 40% 19% 25%
Prevalence of Binge Drinking: 1997
binge drinking Among texas College Students
Binge drinking (consuming five or more drinks in a row for men and four or more drinks
in a row for women on at least two occasions in the last month) continues to be a
problem on Texas college campuses.
ToTAl MAlE FEMAlE AgE 18-20
30% 38% 23% 27%
Prevalence of Binge Drinking: 2005
Female binge drinking on Texas college campuses showed a dramatic 22.3%
increase from 1997 to 2005. In both surveys, many of those who identified themselves
as binge drinkers did not perceive it as a problem. In the 1997 survey, 63% of the binge
drinkers considered themselves moderate drinkers, while 29% identified themselves as
light drinkers. The 2005 survey showed similar numbers, as 61% said they were moderate
drinkers, and 26% considered themselves light drinkers.
lifetime use, a 10.3% increase for past-year use, and a 17.4% increase in past-month use
of tobacco products. The upper income bracket (60K+) has an increase of 14.2% in
lifetime use from 1997-2005 and a 12.2% increase in past-year use of tobacco products.
The past-month use number stayed essentially the same between the two surveys.
overview of Substance Abuse in texas: College
PU
Bl
IC
H
ea
lT
H
&
sa
Fe
TY
© Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l I n c . R E P O RT C A R D 2 0 0 8 w w w. Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l . o r g 2 1
Comparisons to College Students nationwide
The findings of the 2005 DSHS survey were used for comparison with the Monitoring the
Future (MTF) study that looked at behaviors of college students on the national level.
There are a few differences in the sampling, data collection, and analytical protocols
used for the two studies, but the results are generally comparable.
For instance, Texas college students tended to binge drink less at 30% compared to the
national rate on college campuses of 40%. The national study defined binge drinking as
five or more drinks in a row in the past two weeks.
Texas college students reported a slightly higher rate of past-month use of cigarettes at
26% than their national counterparts at 24%.
College students reported a higher prevalence of use of marijuana on the national study.
For example, 17% reported past-month use of marijuana on the national study, compared to
11% among Texas college students.
Alcohol use and Risky behaviors
Another area of concern is substance use combined with dangerous behavior. The
pattern of drinking and driving has changed little for college students in the eight years
between the two surveys. The figures show that while the numbers are lower, college
students continue to drink and drive, even after binge drinking or when they are the
designated driver.
1997 2005
Drink/Drive 39% 29%
Binge/Drive 15% 11%
Designated Driver/More than 1 Drink 14% 11%
Could Have 4 Drinks/Still Drive 13% 12%
Prevalence of Drinking and Driving
overview of Substance Abuse in texas: College
PU
Bl
IC
H
ea
lT
H
&
sa
Fe
TY Consequences of underage Alcohol use
© Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l I n c . R E P O RT C A R D 2 0 0 8 w w w. Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l . o r g 2 2
Beginning in 1976, the State of Texas, through the Department of
Public Safety (DPS), started producing a yearly Uniform Crime Report. This report
collects, tabulates, and publishes data on major crime from all jurisdictions in Texas.
The following is a look at some of the data collected this decade in relation to driving
under the influence and violations of other liquor laws by youth. From 2000 to 2007
there is a noticeable increase of female arrests for underage alcohol violations.
texas department of Public Safety – Arrest data 2000-2007
ToTAl MAlES FEMAlES
21,171 16,623 4,548
2000 Violation of Liquor Laws – Under the age of 21
L I q u o R L A w v I o L At I o n S
Underage Females made up 21% of the total number of liquor law violations
cited by the DPS for 2000.
Underage Females were 27.5% of the total number of liquor law violations cited
by the DPS for 2007.
AgE 17 AgE 18 AgE 19 AgE 20
2000 781 1,047 982 774
2007 879 1,292 1,268 944
% Increase 12.5% 23.4% 29.1% 22.9%
Female Liquor Law Violations
ToTAl MAlES FEMAlES
19,340 14,019 5,321
2007 Violation of Liquor Laws – Under the age of 21
The following chart indicates the increase in underage female liquor law violations.
PU
Bl
IC
H
ea
lT
H
&
sa
Fe
TY
© Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l I n c . R E P O RT C A R D 2 0 0 8 w w w. Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l . o r g 2 3
ToTAl MAlES FEMAlES
21,716 19,293 2,423
2000 Public Drunkenness Arrests – Under the age of 21
ToTAl MAlES FEMAlES
17,518 14,539 2,979
2007 Public Drunkenness Arrests – Under the age of 21
Underage Females were 17% of the total number of public drunkenness arrests
according to DPS statistics.
AgE 17 AgE 18 AgE 19 AgE 20
2000 432 508 590 536
2007 422 736 795 777
% Increase/ -0.02% +44.8% +34.7% +44.9% Decrease
Female Public Drunkenness
ToTAl MAlES FEMAlES
11,056 9,857 1,199
2000 DUI Arrests – Under the Age of 21
P u b L I C d R u n K e n e S S
Underage Females were 11.2% of the total number of public drunkenness arrests
according to DPS statistics.
Consequences of underage Alcohol use
d R I v I n g u n d e R t H e I n f L u e n C e A R R e S t S ( d u I )
Females made up 11% of the total DUI arrests under the age of 21 in 2000.
The following chart indicates the increase in underage female public drunkeness arrests.
PU
Bl
IC
H
ea
lT
H
&
sa
Fe
TY
© Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l I n c . R E P O RT C A R D 2 0 0 8 w w w. Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l . o r g 2 4
ToTAl MAlES FEMAlES
11,457 9,097 2,360
2007 DUI Arrests – Under the Age of 21
Females made up 21% of the total DUI arrests under the age of 21 in 2007.
AgE 17 AgE 18 AgE 19 AgE 20
2000 124 262 360 403
2007 190 528 754 837
% Increase 53.2% 101.5% 109.4% 107.6%
Female DUI Arrests
Increases in Risky behavior Among females
Between 2000 and 2007, the number of underage male arrests for Driving Under the
Influence decreased by 7.7% (from 9,857 to 9,097). During that same time period,
the number of underage female arrests for Driving Under the Influence increased
by 96.8% (from 1,199 to 2,360) according to the Texas Department of Public Safety
arrest data.
Between 2000 and 2007, the number of underage Liquor Law violations for underage
males decreased by 15.7%. During that same time period, the number of underage
female Liquor Law violations increased by 16.9% according to the Texas Department
of Public Safety arrest data.
Between 2000 and 2007, the number of underage male arrests for Public Drunkenness
decreased by 24.6%. During that same time period, the number of underage female
Public Drunkenness arrests increased by 22.9% according to Texas Department of
Public Safety arrest data.
Consequences of underage Alcohol use
The following chart indicates the increase in underage female DUI arrests.
PU
Bl
IC
H
ea
lT
H
&
sa
Fe
TY Consequences of underage Alcohol use
© Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l I n c . R E P O RT C A R D 2 0 0 8 w w w. Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l . o r g 2 5
other data of Interest
Driving after drinking continues to be a major problem among Texans, including youth.
According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Texas continues to lead
the nation in percentage of traffic fatalities that are alcohol-related. From 2002-2006,
the national average of alcohol-related traffic fatalities ranged from 40%-41%. For the
State of Texas alcohol-related traffic fatalities accounted for between 46%-48% of all
traffic fatalities between 2002-2006.
In 2006, 17,062 people were killed in the U.S. in alcohol-related motor vehicle traffic
crashes (41% of all traffic fatalities). Texas recorded 1,677 alcohol-related traffic fatalities
in 2006, which was 48% of all traffic fatalities. The National Transportation Safety Board
(NTSB) currently estimates the cost of each alcohol-related traffic fatality to be
approximately $977,000, thus the 2006 fatalities cost Texas $1.6 billion.
Age breakdowns are only available up to 2005, a year that saw 1,569 alcohol-related
traffic fatalities. Below is a breakdown of some key age groups for 2005.
AgE ToTAl FATAliTiES AlCoHol-rElATED FATAliTiES %
15–20 526 215 41%
21–34 988 576 58%
35+ 1,750 695 40%
Alcohol-related traffic fatalities by Age: 2005
PU
Bl
IC
H
ea
lT
H
&
sa
Fe
TY tobacco And texas: A Comparative Look
at Revenues and Costs
© Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l I n c . R E P O RT C A R D 2 0 0 8 w w w. Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l . o r g 2 6
Tobacco use in Texas among both adults and youth, though
slightly in decline, still remains a serious public health issue for the State.
According to the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Department
of State Health Services (DSHS), 19.3% or 3,283,600 adult Texans smoke tobacco.
Meanwhile 21.1% or 294,700 Texas High School students also smoke. It is estimated that
67.7 million packs of cigarettes are bought or smoked by underage youth each year.
Nationwide, youth smoking has declined dramatically since the mid-1990s, but that
decline appears to have slowed in recent years. In Texas, 35,900 youth under the age
of 18 become daily smokers each year, and the number of adults who will die each year
from their own smoking is estimated at 24,200.
In 1999, as part of the initial tobacco settlement with the States, Texas, by law, placed
all of the tobacco settlement funds into several permanent endowments earmarked for
several purposes including: higher education, children and public health, and emergency
medical services. As Texas receives new funds as part of their settlement with the
tobacco industry, the funds are appropriated by the Legislature on a biennial basis.
The 1999 law also directed that $200 million of the $1.8 billion Texas received from its
first two tobacco settlement payments be put into a Tobacco Education Enforcement
Trust Fund, with no future payments to be placed into this fund. A maximum of 7.5% of
the annual interest generated from the trust is available to fund a tobacco prevention
and cessation program. Only the interest earned from each of the endowments is
available for expenditure and must be appropriated by the Legislature every session.
CdC Recommendations
The U.S. Center for Disease Control and Prevention recommends that Texas spend a
minimum of $103 million up to $284 million a year to have an effective, comprehensive
tobacco prevention program. Texas currently allocates $11.8 million for tobacco
prevention. This is 11.4% of the CDC’s minimum recommendation and puts Texas
42nd among all states in funding tobacco prevention programs. Texas spending on
tobacco prevention amounts to 0.6% of the $2.1 billion in tobacco-generated revenue
the state collects each year in tobacco settlement payments and tobacco taxes.
PU
Bl
IC
H
ea
lT
H
&
sa
Fe
TY tobacco And texas: A Comparative Look
at Revenues and Costs
© Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l I n c . R E P O RT C A R D 2 0 0 8 w w w. Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l . o r g 2 7
State Comparison of tobacco-Related data
Here is a view of how Texas compares with its neighboring states as well as a few other
states of like size when looking at some state-specific tobacco-related data and costs.
ADUlT ADUlT SMokiNg YoUTH SMokiNg YoUTH WHo Will YoUTH AliVE WHo SMokiNg rATE DEATHS rATE BECoME SMokErS Will DiE FroM SMokiNg
TX 19.3% 24,200 21.1% 1,573,000 503,000
CA 14.3% 37,800 15.4% 1,862,000 596,000
FL 19.3% 28,700 14.5% 1,153,000 369,000
OK 25.8% 5,800 23.2% 273,000 87,000
NM 20.8% 2,100 24.2% 118,000 38,000
LA 22.6% 6,400 25.0% 340,000 109,000
Key State-Specific Tobacco-Related Data & Rankings*
*Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, www.tobaccofreekids.org
SMokiNg CigArETTE TAx CigArETTE TAx STATE ToBACCo % oF CDC CDC % HEAlTH CoSTS PEr PACk NATioNAl rANk CoNTrol SPENDiNg MiNiMUM NATioNAl rANk
TX $5.83 billion $1.41 19th $11.8 million 11.4% 42nd
CA $9.14 billion $0.87 31st $77.4 million 46.9% 25th
FL $6.32 billion $0.339 47th $58.0 million 74.0% 13th
OK $1.16 billion $1.03 26th $14.2 million 65.1% 17th
NM $461 million $0.91 30th $9.6 million 70.1% 15th
LA $1.47 million $0.36 45th $7.7 million 28.3% 35th
Key State-Specific Tobacco-Related Costs & Revenues *
*Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, www.tobaccofreekids.org
eN
VI
RO
NM
eN
Ta
l
PR
eV
eN
TI
ON
s
TR
aT
eg
Ie
s overview of environmental Strategies
Rooted in the public health model, environmental, community-based
prevention strategies act to create change and enforce policies and procedures as well
as change attitudes, behaviors, and beliefs (social norms) related to substance use.
Underage drinking, tobacco use, and their consequences have a detrimental impact on
public health and safety in Texas and across the nation. Therefore it is important that
prevention of underage use of alcohol, tobacco, and other drugs is addressed in a
comprehensive way, utilizing strategies that are research-based.
In 2003, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) released Reducing Underage Drinking:
A Collective Responsibility, laying out recommendations of several environmental
strategies that have shown effectiveness in reducing underage consumption of alcohol
whether through reducing access, changing community norms, or enforcing existing
policies. The Center for Disease Control’s Best Practices for Comprehensive Tobacco
Control Programs – 2007 provides evidence-based strategies for reduction and
prevention of tobacco use. These strategies are supported by research conducted at
a community level and intended for community implementation. Because Texas is a
preemptive state (local laws cannot be more stringent than state law unless the state law
specifies otherwise), multiple evidence-based environmental strategies, especially those
focused on alcohol, can only be implemented after policy change at the State level.
This section will discuss public health and safety issues in Texas as well as look at key
environmental strategies and how Texas compares to similar states in implementation.
© Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l I n c . R E P O RT C A R D 2 0 0 8 w w w. Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l . o r g 2 8
eN
VI
RO
NM
eN
Ta
l
PR
eV
eN
TI
ON
s
TR
aT
eg
Ie
s Implementation: How texas Ranks
© Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l I n c . R E P O RT C A R D 2 0 0 8 w w w. Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l . o r g 2 9
excise taxesIom Report Recommendation 12-7CdC Recommendation
Because youth are more price sensitive, raising excise taxes acts as a deterrent to youth
consumption of alcohol and tobacco. The taxes can also be used as a source of revenue
for funding prevention. The following information and charts show the excise taxes on
beer, wine, spirits and tobacco and how Texas compares with its neighboring states, as
well as states across the nation that are of similar size.
ExCiSE TAx Tx Ar ok NM lA
Beer (per gallon) 0.19 0.23 0.40 0.41 0.32
Wine (per gallon) 0.20 0.75 0.72 1.70 0.11
Spirits (per gallon) $2.40 $2.50 $5.56 $6.06 $2.50
Cigarettes (per pack) $1.41 0.59 $1.03 0.91 0.36
ExCiSE TAx Tx CA Fl oH NY U.S MEDiAN
Beer (per gallon) 0.19 0.20 0.48 0.18 0.11 0.188
Wine (per gallon) 0.20 0.20 $2.25 0.30 0.19 0.69
Spirits (per gallon) $2.40 $3.30 $6.50 N/A* $6.44 $3.75
Cigarettes (per pack) $1.41 0.87 0.34 0.44 $1.50 $1.00
Excise Tax Rates on Beer, Wine and Spirits for Texas and its Neighboring States
Excise Tax Rates on Beer, Wine and Spirits for Texas and States of Similar Size
*In 18 states, the state government directly controls the sale of distilled spirits. Revenue in these states is generated by various taxes, fees, and net liquor profits.
eN
VI
RO
NM
eN
Ta
l
PR
eV
eN
TI
ON
s
TR
aT
eg
Ie
s Implementation: How texas Ranks
© Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l I n c . R E P O RT C A R D 2 0 0 8 w w w. Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l . o r g 3 0
Sobriety CheckpointsIom Report Recommendation 9-11
Sobriety Checkpoints are recognized as an efficient law enforcement tool and a sound,
science-based environmental strategy to help reduce and prevent alcohol-related
crashes. Sobriety checkpoints are stops where law enforcement systematically check
drivers to assess alcohol impairment. Sobriety checkpoints are not only about identifying and
punishing those who break the law; they’re also about convincing people not to break
the law in the first place. They are most effective when well publicized, which increases
the perception of risk of arrest. Public opinion rests in favor of sobriety checkpoints.
The Scripps Research Center’s 2005 Winter Texas Poll showed 67% of Texans favor a law
that would allow sobriety checkpoints.
The U.S. Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of sobriety checkpoints in 1990.
The Court held that the interest in reducing alcohol-impaired driving was sufficient to
justify the brief intrusion of a sobriety checkpoint.
The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) currently estimates the cost of each
alcohol-related traffic fatality to be approximately $977,000, thus the 2006 traffic fatalities
cost the state of Texas more than $1.6 billion. Sobriety checkpoints can result in
substantial savings to a community in relation to the financial costs of alcohol-related
traffic fatalities.
A systematic review of published studies, conducted by a team of experts on behalf of
the Task Force on Community Preventive Services, found that sobriety checkpoints were
effective in reducing crashes, injuries and deaths. The studies found that after
implementation of sobriety checkpoints:
• Crashes thought to involve alcohol dropped a median of 20%, and
• Fatal crashes thought to involve alcohol dropped a median of 23%.
eN
VI
RO
NM
eN
Ta
l
PR
eV
eN
TI
ON
s
TR
aT
eg
Ie
s Implementation: How texas Ranks
© Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l I n c . R E P O RT C A R D 2 0 0 8 w w w. Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l . o r g 3 1
How they work
There are two types of sobriety checkpoints in use: Random Breath Testing and Selective
Breath Testing. In Random Breath Testing (RBT) checkpoints, police test all drivers for
blood alcohol levels. This system is used in several European countries and in Australia.
Selective Breath Testing (SBT) checkpoints call for a specific pre-selected number of cars
to be stopped, and police must have a reason to suspect that the driver has been drinking in
order to test. This is the only type of sobriety checkpoint system used in the United States.
traditional Sobriety Checkpoints
A key factor in the effectiveness of any sobriety checkpoint is that they be well publicized
to create a highly visible enforcement tactic and, as a result, increase the perception
of risk of being caught driving under the influence. A similar public safety enforcement
program with a public awareness campaign is “Click it or Ticket” for seatbelt
enforcement. Preventing impaired driving is the goal of sobriety checkpoints. Signs
clearly mark the upcoming checkpoint well in advance, and vehicles are stopped in a
predetermined sequence, such as every third or fourth vehicle.
Staffing requirements for checkpoints may vary, depending on several factors, such as location
and traffic volume of the selected site. The traditional sobriety checkpoint is human-resource
intensive in both uniform and support personnel. They can generally involve as many as 15
to 20 officers who stop traffic in both directions. Cars are stopped using a pre-determined
mathematical formula – not by how they look or drive; for example,every 11th car is stopped.
During the stop, if a driver exhibits signs of impairment then a sobriety test is performed. In
a study conducted earlier this decade, it was determined that when a community runs an
intensive sobriety checkpoint program each checkpoint costs about $9,600.
Low-Staffing Sobriety Checkpoints
While sobriety checkpoints can lead to substantial financial savings for communities,
it can be costly on a local basis to initiate and maintain checkpoint programs, especially
for rural communities. This has led to a trend of small-scale sobriety checkpoints that
eN
VI
RO
NM
eN
Ta
l
PR
eV
eN
TI
ON
s
TR
aT
eg
Ie
s Implementation: How texas Ranks
© Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l I n c . R E P O RT C A R D 2 0 0 8 w w w. Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l . o r g 3 2
do not involve large numbers of personnel. This results in a more efficient use of limited
resources and a deterrence capability, without conducting a large scale sobriety
checkpoint operation.
The Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation and the Insurance Institute for Highway
Safety conducted a study of two West Virginia counties that ran small-scale sobriety
checkpoints. During the study, 48 low-staffing checkpoints (3-5 officers) took place in the
two counties in both municipal and rural areas. The study’s findings showed that
low-staffing checkpoints, at a cost of $350-$400 per site, can be expected to result in
reductions in drivers operating at high blood alcohol content levels (BAC). Relative to
two comparison counties, the proportion of drivers with BAC’s of 0.08 percent or more
was 64% lower.
Another example saw the Brevard County (Florida) Sheriff’s Office initiate a small-scale
sobriety checkpoint program that used 10-12 officers as opposed to the usual 35-40.
The program used some officers from other jurisdictions and combined this with media
events and rotating checkpoints to high crash locations. Operation Checkpoint Brevard
made 163 impaired driving arrests over a two-year period. Checkpoint Brevard produced
a significant decrease in alcohol-related traffic fatalities (38%) and a decrease in
alcohol-related crashes with injury (9.3%)
The experiences in states with small-scale checkpoints demonstrate that they can result
in a more efficient use of human resources with lower operational costs. With the proper
use of media and collaboration between smaller agencies, they also can increase the
visibility and general deterrence through greater mobility.
texas and Sobriety Checkpoints
In 1994, a State Appeals Court ruled that without statewide guidelines, checkpoints
are unconstitutional in Texas, which means a community cannot implement sobriety
checkpoints. Establishing statewide guidelines requires policy by the Texas Legislature,
and to date, the Texas Legislature has not established such guidelines. Since 1994,
legislation has been filed in every session in the Texas Legislature.
eN
VI
RO
NM
eN
Ta
l
PR
eV
eN
TI
ON
s
TR
aT
eg
Ie
s Implementation: How texas Ranks
© Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l I n c . R E P O RT C A R D 2 0 0 8 w w w. Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l . o r g 3 3
Keg RegistrationIom Report Recommendation 9-8
Beer kegs are a relatively cheap source of alcohol – an appealing factor for a price-
sensitive youth. With an average keg holding approximately 165 servings, rented at $75
a filling, that equals just 45 cents a beer. This makes beer kegs a popular and relatively
inexpensive source of alcohol at underage drinking parties where large numbers of
people gather. The kegs are often purchased by friends, relatives, or other adults over
the age of 21. When police arrive at these parties, some of which are referred to as
“pasture,” “desert,” or “house” parties, people scatter, making it difficult for law
enforcement to identify who purchased the kegs and hold them accountable for
providing them. Keg registration is a tool for police to identify the purchaser and aids
them in prosecuting that person for supplying alcohol to minors.
When a person rents a keg, they complete a form for their deposit. Through a number
on the keg and the registration form, the identity of the renter and the specific keg
would be linked. The registration is then kept on hand by the retailer and readily
available for law enforcement to review. Currently Texas has no statewide law requiring
retailers to use keg registration.
texas and Keg Registration
In the 79th Texas Legislature, Rep. Craig Eissler (R) of The Woodlands introduced a bill
requiring keg registration labels for kegs being used for off-premise consumption.
However it died in committee. Reintroduced in the 80th Legislature, the keg registration
bill made it out of committee but too late for a vote on the House floor. At the time of
this writing, 31 states and the District of Columbia have keg registration laws, and Utah
bans kegs altogether.
eN
VI
RO
NM
eN
Ta
l
PR
eV
eN
TI
ON
s
TR
aT
eg
Ie
s Implementation: How texas Ranks
© Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l I n c . R E P O RT C A R D 2 0 0 8 w w w. Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l . o r g 3 4
Alcohol exclusion Law (uPPL)Iom Report Recommendation 10-5
The Uniform Accident and Sickness Policy Provision Law (UPPL) was designed as a “model”
law by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) in 1947 and can be
found in the Texas Insurance Code. The law allows health insurers to deny payment for
health costs relating to injuries when any type of alcohol or narcotic is found in the patient’s
system. It was originally designed to deter drunk driving. The unintended consequence has
been a reluctance of emergency rooms (ER) to document verifiable evidence of a patient’s
toxicology. This allows hospitals to recoup their costs and continue to provide care to the
patient, but it results in gross under reporting of injuries related to alcohol and substance use
and missed opportunities for early detection and intervention of alcohol and other substance
abuse problems.
Scope of the Problem
In their public policy statement on alcohol exclusion laws, the American Society of
Addiction Medicine notes that national studies indicate that 35-50% of injured patients
treated in ERs and trauma centers are under the influence of alcohol or other intoxicants.
They also note that injuries are the leading cause of death in individuals less than 40
years of age, the fourth leading cause of overall mortality, and the number one cause
of ER visits, with alcohol use being the leading contributing factor to injuries. In states
where alcohol exclusion laws are in effect, patients do not receive adequate screening
or early intervention for alcohol and drug abuse. A national survey found that 27.7% of
trauma surgeons felt that screening would threaten reimbursement of medical costs
(The National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism).
Cost of Alcohol exclusion Laws
In 2006, Ensuring Solutions to Alcohol Problems, a project at The George Washington
University Medical Center, conducted a national and state-by-state analysis of the costs
of unidentified alcohol problems and the savings that would result from screening and
eN
VI
RO
NM
eN
Ta
l
PR
eV
eN
TI
ON
s
TR
aT
eg
Ie
s
© Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l I n c . R E P O RT C A R D 2 0 0 8 w w w. Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l . o r g 3 5
brief intervention. They found that the failure to identify and treat substance use in
emergencies services may cost Texas businesses and residents $889 million in health
care expenses each year. Additionally, Texas could save more than $175 million per year
if ER patients were routinely screened for alcohol and drugs and received treatment
when necessary.
In 2001, NAIC formally changed its position to support the repeal of alcohol exclusion
laws (UPPL legislation). Other groups that support the repeal of this language include:
the National Conference of Insurance Legislators, American Medical Association,
Mothers Against Drunk Driving, National Commission Against Drunk Driving, American
College of Emergency Physicians, and the American Public Health Association.
In recent years, twelve states have prohibited the use of alcohol exclusions: Colorado,
Connecticut, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Maryland, Nevada, North Carolina, Oregon, Rhode
Island, South Dakota, and Washington.
texas and Alcohol exclusion Laws
In the past two cycles of the Texas Legislature, Rep. Craig Eiland (D) of Galveston has
been an advocate for the removal of the alcohol exclusion law (UPPL). In the 80th Session,
he drafted HB 634 that would have removed the alcohol exclusion law from the state’s
insurance code. The last action on this bill was left pending in the House Committee on
Insurance on April 17, 2008.
Implementation: How texas Ranks
eN
VI
RO
NM
eN
Ta
l
PR
eV
eN
TI
ON
s
TR
aT
eg
Ie
s Implementation: How texas Ranks
© Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l I n c . R E P O RT C A R D 2 0 0 8 w w w. Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l . o r g 3 6
Statewide Smoking banCdC Recommendation Surgeon general’s Report Recommendation
According to the Surgeon General’s Report The Health Consequences of Involuntary
Exposure to Tobacco Smoke, secondhand tobacco smoke can be just as harmful as
firsthand smoke.
Because of growing health concerns in regards to secondhand smoke, many cities,
counties, and states across the nation have established various forms of smoking bans
or limitations. The Center for Disease Control established a task force to examine the
effects of tobacco smoke on all levels of society. Their findings from several systematic
reviews of smoking bans and ordinances can be outlined in four points:
1. Studies that evaluated the effect of smoking bans in workplaces observed an average
reduction of 74% in exposure to components of secondhand smoke (e.g., nicotine
vapor).
2. Smoking bans were more effective in reducing secondhand smoke exposures than
were smoking restrictions.
3. Smoking bans were effective in a wide variety of public and private workplaces and
healthcare settings. Their effectiveness should extend to most indoor workplaces in
the United States.
4. Studies evaluating smoking bans also observed reductions in the amount smoked.
Smoking bans and Restrictions in texas Cities
The 76th Legislature appropriated funding for the Texas Department of State Health
Services (DSHS) to establish a research team of eight universities to prevent tobacco
use and promote cessation. As part of that team, the University of Houston created the
Texas Smoke-Free Ordinance Database for DSHS. This database is a collection of
smoking ordinances from municipalities across the state.
eN
VI
RO
NM
eN
Ta
l
PR
eV
eN
TI
ON
s
TR
aT
eg
Ie
s Implementation: How texas Ranks
© Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l I n c . R E P O RT C A R D 2 0 0 8 w w w. Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l . o r g 3 7
The researchers also developed a system of ranking each city and county on the
effectiveness of their smoking ordinance. It is based on a one to five scale and broken
down into five categories. Listed below are the cities and municipalities that received
the highest ranking for their secondhand smoke ordinances that include municipal workplaces,
private workplaces, restaurants, bars outside restaurants, bars inside restaurants.
Abilene Copperas Cove Marshall Southlake
Austin El Paso Pearland Tyler
Baytown Houston Plano Vernon
Beaumont Laredo Socorro Victoria
texas and Statewide Smoking bans
In the 80th Texas Legislature, two pieces of legislation would have banned smoking in
most workplaces and indoor public places in Texas, including restaurants and bars.
The penalty for violating this law would have been a fine to the establishment of $100
per cigarette. SB 368 authored by Sen. Rodney Ellis (D) of Houston and HB 9 authored
by Rep. Myra Crownover (R) of Lake Dallas were both left pending.
80
TH
T
ex
as
l
eg
Is
la
TU
Re Interim Study Charges
© Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l I n c . R E P O RT C A R D 2 0 0 8 w w w. Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l . o r g 3 8
Texas maintains a “Citizen-Legislator” system of government where
the Legislature only meets every other year. This leaves a limited amount of time for
legislators to study important issues in-session. Therefore during the interim between
sessions, both the Speaker of the House and the Lieutenant Governor will call for specific
issues to be studied by committees in both the House and the Senate. These “Interim
Charges” are the topics that the committees are directed to study in the months leading
up to the regular session of the Texas Legislature. These committees will produce Interim
Studies, reports to the House or the Senate containing the committee’s findings and
recommendations for the upcoming Legislative Session.
Interim Studies serve several purposes. They provide an opportunity for legislators to
learn more about issues they may choose to address with new legislation in the coming
session. They also provide a forum for examining the implementation of legislation
passed in previous sessions. Interim Studies give legislators the chance to monitor and
provide oversight of the state agencies within the jurisdiction of respective committees.
Interim Studies are also unique opportunities for the citizens of Texas, either as individuals
or as members of grassroots organizations or agencies, to be heard on vital issues
through submission of research and testimony during public comment periods and
public hearings. The 81st Session of the Texas Legislature will begin on January 13, 2009,
and the final gavel for the session is set to fall on May 28, 2009.
The following Interim Charges (assigned in the House by Speaker Tom Craddick and in
the Senate by Lieutenant Governor David Dewhurst) are related to substance abuse and
organized by committee. For each hearing held on Interim Charges, Texans Standing Tall
has witness lists available for your viewing.
80
TH
T
ex
as
l
eg
Is
la
TU
Re Interim Study Charges
© Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l I n c . R E P O RT C A R D 2 0 0 8 w w w. Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l . o r g 3 9
House Committee on Appropriations Subcommittee on Criminal JusticeChair: representative Sylvester Turner (D-Houston)
Vice Chair: representative Corbin Van Arsdale (r-Houston)
Members: representative Alma Allen (D-Houston)
representative kirk England (D-grand Prairie)
representative Jim Mcreynolds (D-lufkin)
representative Debbie riddle (r-Houston)
House Committee on CorrectionsSubcommittee on Substance Abuse and Mental IllnessChair: representative Jerry Madden (r-Plano)
Vice Chair: representative Scott Hochberg (D-Houston)
Members: representative Jim Mcreynolds (D-lufkin)
representative Jim Dunnam (D-Waco)
representative Pat Haggerty (r-El Paso)
representative Delwin Jones (r-lubbock)
representative rene oliveira (D-Brownsville)
Interim Charge 18 & 19 (Appropriations) and Interim Charge 6 (Corrections)
Assess the relationship between mental illness and criminal behavior, offer reforms
needed to address the proliferation of mental illness in the adult and juvenile criminal
justice systems. This review should include an examination of data sharing between
criminal justice and health and human services agencies, proper screening, assessments,
treatment, discharge planning, post-release supervision, and community services.
Review and research the availability, coordination, efficiency, and allocation of substance
abuse treatment resources for probationers, pretrial defendants, people in the custody
of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ), and parolees. This review should
include methods to reduce and improve current assessments, training, and referring
protocols and the identification of any barriers that may be impeding all of the above.
A joint hearing was held on May 29, 2008.
80
TH
T
ex
as
l
eg
Is
la
TU
Re Interim Study Charges
© Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l I n c . R E P O RT C A R D 2 0 0 8 w w w. Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l . o r g 4 0
House Committee on Criminal JurisprudenceChair: representative Aaron Peña (D-Edinburg)
Vice Chair: representative Allen Vaught (D-Dallas)
Members: representative Debbie riddle (r-Houston)
representative Terri Hodge (D-Dallas)
representative Juan Escobar (D-kingsville)
representative Barbara Mallory Caraway (D-Dallas)
representative Paula Pierson (D-Arlington)
representative robert Talton (r-Pasadena)
representative Paul Moreno (D-El Paso)
Interim Charge 4
Study the prosecution and effectiveness of current drunk driving laws in Texas and
recommend any legislative changes needed to further combat the problem.
A hearing was held on January 31, 2008.
House Committee on Licensing and Administrative ProceduresChair: representative ismael “kino” Flores (D-Mission)
Vice Chair: representative Charlie geren (r-river oaks)
Members: representative Tony J. goolsby (r-Dallas)
representative Mike Hamilton (r-Mauriceville)
representative Delwin Jones (r-lubbock)
representative Borris Miles (D-Houston)
representative Chente Quintanilla (D-El Paso)
representative Senfronia Thompson (D-Houston)
representative Carl isett (r-lubbock)
Interim Charge 3
Study current distance requirement provisions in the Alcoholic Beverage Code and
recommend any changes needed to promote clarity and uniformity.
At the time of publication of the Report Card 2008, a hearing had yet to be scheduled.
80
TH
T
ex
as
l
eg
Is
la
TU
Re Interim Study Charges
© Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l I n c . R E P O RT C A R D 2 0 0 8 w w w. Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l . o r g 4 1
House Committee on Public Health
Chair: representative Dianne White Delisi (r-Temple)*
Vice Chair: representative Jodie laubenberg (r-rockwall)*
Members: representative Ellen Cohen (D-Houston)
representative garnet Coleman (D-Houston)
representative Veronica gonzales (D-McAllen)
representative Susan king (r-Abilene)
representative Dora olivo (D-Missouri City)
representative Vicki Truitt (r-Southlake)
representative Jim Jackson (r-Carrollton)
* During the writing of this Report Card, Rep. Dianne White Delisi retired, and Rep. Jodie
Laubenberg was appointed Chair of the Committee on Public Health, leaving the
position of Vice Chair vacant.
Interim Charge 1
Monitor and evaluate the full array of wellness initiatives undertaken by the State of
Texas to include the newly adopted state employee wellness and prevention legislation
(HB 1297*, 80th Legislature, Regular Session) and a pilot program to encourage healthy
lifestyles, such as smoking cessation within the Medicaid program (SB 10, 80th
Legislature, Regular Session) for state employees. Develop strategies for maximizing
potential health benefits and optimizing the return on the State of Texas’ investments in
wellness. Include a review of other state and private sector programs for employee
wellness that result in prevention cost savings.
*In the 80th Legislative session both the House and the Senate passed bills that
addressed wellness and prevention. As stated in the authors’ statement of intent of the
bill, current state employee wellness programs do not include the components necessary to
reduce health care related costs and encourage healthy behavior. The legislature was
especially concerned about the cost of such illnesses as diabetes, congestive heart
failure, and hypertension that often result from unhealthy behaviors such as smoking,
overeating, and physical inactivity. H.B. 1297 required the Department of State Health
Services to designate a wellness coordinator to develop a model wellness program and
80
TH
T
ex
as
l
eg
Is
la
TU
Re Interim Study Charges
© Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l I n c . R E P O RT C A R D 2 0 0 8 w w w. Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l . o r g 4 2
to assist state agencies with wellness initiatives.
On the Senate side of the aisle, S.B. 10 enacted the recommendations of the Senate
Committee on Health and Human Services with the goal of improving the Texas
Medicaid program by focusing on prevention, individual choice, better planning,
modernizing services, as well as reducing Texas’ rate of uninsured. Interim Charge 1
calls for the Committee to evaluate the progress of prevention through these two bills.
A hearing was held on January 17, 2008.
Interim Charge 8 (Public Health) & Interim Charge 7 (transportation)
For information on this Joint Interim Charge with the House Committee on
Transportation please see below.
House Committee on Transportation
Chair: Representative Mike Krusee (R-Taylor) Vice Chair: Representative Larry Phillips (R-Sherman)Members: Representative Joe Deshotel (D-Port Arthur) Representative Pat Haggerty (R-El Paso) Representative Patricia Harless (R-Spring) Representative Fred Hill (R-Richardson) Representative Nathan Macias (R-Bulverde) Representative Jim Murphy (R-Houston)
Representative Linda Harper-Brown (R-Irving)
Interim Charge 1
Research and make recommendations to the legislature on programs to improve safety
for teen drivers.
A hearing was held on April 30, 2008.
80
TH
T
ex
as
l
eg
Is
la
TU
Re Interim Study Charges
© Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l I n c . R E P O RT C A R D 2 0 0 8 w w w. Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l . o r g 4 3
Interim Charge 7 (transportation) and Interim Charge 8 (Public Health)
Review the effectiveness of the Driver Responsibility Program and provide recommendations
for increasing the collection rate of assessed penalties. Provide recommendations for
amnesty and incentive programs established by the passage of SB 1723*, 80th Legislature,
Regular Session. Examine the status of Texas’ current statewide trauma system infrastructure
and how the system may be optimized to meet future trauma care needs in a rapidly
growing state with overburdened emergency rooms. (Joint Interim Charge for the House
Committee on Public Health and the House Committee on Transportation.)
*Senate Bill 1723 addressed issues with the Texas Driver Responsibility Program. Passed
by the 78th Legislature, the Driver Responsibility Law established a system that assigns points
to moving violations classified as Class C misdemeanors and applies surcharges to offenders,
based upon the type of offense and the time period in which the citation was received. SB
1723 allowed the Texas Department of Public Safety to set up a collections system for
surcharges, as well as authorizes an amnesty program for some cases.
A joint hearing was held on March 27, 2008.
Senate Committee on Criminal Justice
Chair: Senator John Whitmire (D-Houston)
Vice Chair: Senator kel Seliger (r-Amarillo)
Members: Senator John Carona (r-Dallas)
Senator Bob Deuell (r-greenville)
Senator rodney Ellis (D-Houston)
Senator glenn Hegar (r-katy)
Senator Juan “Chuy” Hinojosa (D-McAllen)
Interim Charge 3
Study the impact of laws designed to reduce illegal drug use and make recommendations
for reducing access to illegal drugs and for developing best practices for preventative
80
TH
T
ex
as
l
eg
Is
la
TU
Re
Interim Study Charges
© Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l I n c . R E P O RT C A R D 2 0 0 8 w w w. Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l . o r g 4 4
programs, focusing on drugs targeted for the younger population, such as cheese heroin.
Assess the impact of limiting access to pseudoephedrine; including the impact restrictions
have had on illegal manufacturers’ methods for producing methamphetamine.
A hearing was held on July 9, 2008.
Senate Committee on Health and Human Services
Chair: Senator Jane Nelson (r-grapevine)
Vice Chair: Senator Bob Deuell (r-greenville)
Members: Senator robert Nichols (r-Jacksonville)
Senator Dan Patrick (r- Houston)
Senator Eliot Shapleigh (D- El Paso)
Senator Carlos Uresti (D-San Antonio)
Senator royce West (D-Dallas)
Senator Judith Zaffirini (D-laredo)
Interim Charge 7
Study the changes in statute contained in SB 10*, 80th Legislature, Regular Session, as
well as the State’s current prevention and wellness efforts and chronic care management
efforts, and identify opportunities for improvement in state policies and programs.
Examine options for expanding and optimizing the State’s current investment in wellness
programs and management tools for individuals with chronic care conditions, including
options that address childhood asthma. Review partnerships with the private sector that
specifically address the following:
• Tobacco cessation, including the evaluation of a statewide smoking ban in public
places;
• Reducing obesity;
• Availability and effectiveness of childhood and adult vaccines, including public
education programs to promote the use of vaccines; and
• More effective management of chronic care conditions.
*SB 10 addressed issues of improving the Texas Medicaid program by focusing on
80
TH
T
ex
as
l
eg
Is
la
TU
Re Interim Study Charges
© Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l I n c . R E P O RT C A R D 2 0 0 8 w w w. Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l . o r g 4 5
prevention, individual choice, better planning, modernizing services, and reducing Texas’
rate of uninsured. For instance, a part of the bill called for a pilot program to be
instituted in one region of the state. Recipients are provided positive incentives to lead
healthy lifestyles. The program would offer expanded health care benefits or
value-added services for Medicaid recipients who participate in certain programs,
such as specified weight loss or smoking cessation programs.
Another portion of the bill allowed the creation of the Texas Health Opportunity Pool.
This provision uses Medicaid dollars as a financing tool to expand private health
insurance to low-income Texans. SB 10 also allows individuals to opt out of Medicaid
and into employer health insurance if financially beneficial.
At the time of publication of the Report Card 2008, a hearing had yet to be scheduled.
CR
ea
TI
Ng
C
OM
MU
NI
TY
C
Ha
Ng
e Highlighting Success
© Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l I n c . R E P O RT C A R D 2 0 0 8 w w w. Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l . o r g 4 6
It is possible to create population-based change through implementing
strategies that effect the lives of many. Here are two examples from the higher education
sector, obtained through interviews with involved parties and from articles published
about the subjects.
Certified Prevention Specialist Certificate Program at Lee College
The field of substance abuse prevention is rapidly growing. Since 2005, all prevention
grants from the Texas Department of State Health Services require at least one staff
person to be a Certified Prevention Specialist. The Texas Certification Board of
Addiction Professionals (TCBAP) offers a Certified Prevention Specialist (CPS) credential
that is reciprocal across the states and countries in the International Certification and
Reciprocity Consortium (ICRC). The certification requires 100 hours of prevention
education, a 120-hour supervised practicum, 2,000 hours (approximately one year) of
work experience in alcohol, tobacco, and other drug prevention, and a passing score on
the ICRC International Written Prevention Specialist Examination. According to TCBAP,
the number of people testing for certification each year has more than quadrupled in the
past three years, with approximately 200 people testing in 2007. Although the credential
is used throughout the country, there are few degree programs that are specifically for
substance abuse prevention.
Howard Bushart, Lead Instructor in the Allied Health Division, Mental Health Services
Program at Lee College in Baytown, Texas, has designed a curriculum for a level one
Substance Abuse Prevention Certificate. Pending the posting of newly adopted Work-
force Education Curriculum Manual courses in Substance Abuse Prevention, Lee College
will offer the first class in this new certificate program in Fall 2008. The certificate will
require six courses for 270 contact hours, 135 of which will be prevention-specific plus a
128-hour practicum in prevention. Students in this program will be qualified for careers in
the field of substance abuse prevention and prepared to sit for the certification exam.
CR
ea
TI
Ng
C
OM
MU
NI
TY
C
Ha
Ng
e Highlighting Success
© Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l I n c . R E P O RT C A R D 2 0 0 8 w w w. Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l . o r g 4 7
mcCombs School of business at the university of texas Says no to tobacco donations
The McCombs School of Business enjoys a reputation as the highest-ranked business
school in Texas and the Southwest and is one of only a few in the nation to be ranked in
the Top 20 in nearly all business specialty areas according to U.S. News & World Report.
McCombs currently boasts the number 14 MBA program in the Forbes Magazine U.S.
business school rankings.
It is also a national leader in putting ethics at the core of its mission as an educational
institution. In November of 2007, the McCombs School of Business at the University of
Texas instituted a new policy to no longer accept contributions from tobacco companies.
The ban covers contributions to student organizations, career fairs, faculty research
projects, and research centers.
McCombs School Dean George Gau stated that it was not ethical for the school to
continue to accept donations from tobacco companies since those gifts come from revenue
generated through the sale of a product that has damaging health consequences for its
consumers.
The McCombs School Associate Dean, Paula C. Murray, became concerned when the
parent company of the tobacco maker Philip Morris – the Altria Group Inc. – wanted
more face time with more than their 6,000 undergraduate students. Since 1989, Philip
Morris has donated over $300,000 to the business school.
As far as can be determined, the McCombs School of Business at the University of Texas
is the first of its kind to put an end to tobacco donations. According to the New York
Times, over the past few years 15 public health and medical schools have turned away
donations from the tobacco industry. The list includes the medical school at Emory
University and the public health schools at Harvard, Johns Hopkins, Ohio State,
Louisiana State, and the Universities of Arizona, Iowa, and North Carolina.
CR
ea
TI
Ng
C
OM
MU
NI
TY
C
Ha
Ng
e Highlighting Success
© Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l I n c . R E P O RT C A R D 2 0 0 8 w w w. Te x a n s S t a n d i n g Ta l l . o r g 4 8
In September of 2007, the regents of the University of California rejected a proposal to
ban university researchers from accepting tobacco money but adopted a policy that calls
for special reviews of any studies to be conducted with such funds. The reviews must
verify that a proposed study “uses sound methodology and appears designed to allow
the researcher to reach objective and scientifically valid conclusions.”
What makes the McCombs decision unique is that, as a business school, it obviously has
strong connections with a variety of corporations. But department chairs and deans at
the business school had become uncomfortable with the tobacco company’s role, along
with their desire to become more involved with undergraduates. There was a concern
that if the tobacco company’s presence on campus became more noticeable that it
could be seen as somewhat of an endorsement of the product.
Paula Murray, the associate dean for undergraduate programs at McCombs, was
especially concerned about the donations. She told the New York Times, “We know the
product is deadly. We know it causes cancer. And we know that the younger you start
smoking, the more likely you will find it hard to quit. With two-thirds of our undergraduates
under 21, to me it’s a no-brainer.”
In the end the decision came down to what fit the McCombs School of Business mission.
For Dean Gau, it was a clear choice.
“At McCombs, we have put ethics at the core of our mission in educating
the next generation of business leaders,” stated Gau. “In the final analysis,
I simply felt that accepting money from an industry that has caused so
much harm to so many without any redeeming qualities was incompatible
with this mission.”