z rocketdyne division · reference: nasa letter sa51-82-97, input of santa susana facility closure,...

8
z Rocketdyne Division ; ~ . . . . : [~ 6633 Canoga Avenu e Canoga Park . California 91304 i1 J i :.'ri l Li01u 1 8 April 1982 Totox : 698478 In reply refer to 82RC0397 3 National Aeronautics and Space Administration George C . M rsliall Space Flight Center Marsha ll Space Flight Center , Alabama 35812 Attention : J . A . Lovingood, SA5 1 Subject : Santa Susana Facility Closur e Reference : NASA Letter SA51-82-97, Input of Santa Susana Facility Closure, to D . J . Sanchini from J . A . Lovingood, date d 30 March 198 2 Dear Jud : The NASA of-rned Santa Susana Facility referenced in your letter consists primarily of a section in the middle of the Santa Susana Field Laboratory (SSFL) kn wn A I o as rea I Thea ilud f . arencesour major test sites and a group of office buildings and shops . At one of these test sites, the Coca area is test stand A3hih iE ,- wc s used for SSM testing . Should you decide to shutdown the SS .E A-3 test stand as e l h ar y as t e end of FY82, the development engine test effort for the remainder of the FPLr development program and the future life growth program planned to be conducted atA-3 would have to be made up by additional development testing at NSTL . A total of 17 months of double shift test effort would have to be added at NSTL if A-3 were shutdown as of the end of FY82 with an additional program cost of approximately .DACT I The resulting delay in the life growth program would reduce the lead time of the test program over the factor of 2 margin on the flight program to approximately one year . Shutdown of the A-3 facility at the end of CY 1983 would impact the life growth program by 2 months . Alternate plans for engine uprating would be significantly impacted, since A-3 was planned on being used through FY85, and jeopardize timely availability of an uprated SSME should that Option be pursued . The effect of shifting the work from SSFL to NSTL would reduce SSME over- head costs by approximately DACTif the work were moved as of the end of FY82, however, this is more than offset by the cost of extending the NSTL test program . Overhead cost to other government programs would of course be severely impacted without the SSME base . Closure of other test sites or buildingswithin the NASA owned Area I I would have a severe impact on other programs because alternate test facilitie s iimmuim i iiu m iu m miu III u 11 BNA04022618

Upload: others

Post on 22-Jun-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: z Rocketdyne Division · Reference: NASA Letter SA51-82-97, Input of Santa Susana Facility Closure, to D. J. Sanchini from J. A. Lovingood, dated 30 March 1982 Dear Jud: The NASA

z

Rocketdyne Division ; ~ . . . . : [~

6633 Canoga Avenu eCanoga Park. California 91304 i1 J i :.'ri l Li01u 1

8 April 1982 Totox: 698478 In reply refer to 82RC03973

National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationGeorge C . M rsliall Space Flight CenterMarshall Space Flight Center , Alabama 35812

Attention: J. A. Lovingood, SA5 1

Subject : Santa Susana Facility Closure

Reference : NASA Letter SA51-82-97, Input of Santa Susana FacilityClosure, to D. J . Sanchini from J . A . Lovingood, dated30 March 198 2

Dear Jud :

The NASA of-rned Santa Susana Facility referenced in your letter consists

primarily of a section in the middle of the Santa Susana Field Laboratory(SSFL) kn wn A Io as rea I Thea ilud f. arencesour major test sites and agroup of office buildings and shops

. At one of these test sites, theCoca area is test stand A3hih iE,- wc s used for SSM testing .

Should you decide to shutdown the SS .E A-3 test stand as e l har y as t e endof FY82, the development engine test effort for the remainder of the FPLr

development program and the future life growth program planned to be

conducted atA-3 would have to be made up by additional developmenttesting at NSTL

. A total of 17 months of double shift test effort wouldhave to be added at NSTL if A-3 were shutdown as of the end of FY82 withan additional program cost of approximately .DACT I The resulting delayin the life growth program would reduce the lead time of the test program

over the factor of 2 margin on the flight program to approximately oneyear

. Shutdown of the A-3 facility at the end of CY 1983 would impactthe life growth program by 2 months

. Alternate plans for engine upratingwould be significantly impacted, since A-3 was planned on being used

through FY85, and jeopardize timely availability of an uprated SSME shouldthat Option be pursued .

The effect of shifting the work from SSFL to NSTL would reduce SSME over-head costs by approximately DACTif the work were moved as of the end ofFY82, however, this is more than offset by the cost of extending the NSTLtest program

. Overhead cost to other government programs would of coursebe severely impacted without the SSME base .

Closure of other test sites or buildingswithin the NASA owned Area I Iwould have a severe impact on other programs because alternate

test facilities

iimmuim i iiu miummiu III u11BNA04022618

Page 2: z Rocketdyne Division · Reference: NASA Letter SA51-82-97, Input of Santa Susana Facility Closure, to D. J. Sanchini from J. A. Lovingood, dated 30 March 1982 Dear Jud: The NASA

are not readily available ; and alsoremdetailedreccnomic impacttstudyhist

SS L, see enclosures I and 2 . A mf actions beyond test stand A-3 .

in work to evaluatethe inpact o

SS"IE seal and bearing resting being conducted

ea IA .raffected since that test site is in

Very truly yours ,

ROCKWELL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

Rocketdyne Divisio n

D. J . Sanchini

at CTL-I would not b

Vice President and

Program Manager

Space Shuttle rain Engine

DJS: fab

Enclosures (2)

iuiiuui i ii in imm II IIBNA04022619

Page 3: z Rocketdyne Division · Reference: NASA Letter SA51-82-97, Input of Santa Susana Facility Closure, to D. J. Sanchini from J. A. Lovingood, dated 30 March 1982 Dear Jud: The NASA

NASA-OWNED SANTA SUSANA FACILITY (AREA

UTILIZATION

NASA/SSME Engine Tes t

NASA/Atlas MA-5 Engine Accept. Test

tAF/Atlas MA-3 Engine Accept

. Tes

NASA/Delta RS-27 Engine Accept . Tes t

NASA/Delta RS-27 Vernier Engine Test

NASA/Atlas MA-5 Vernier ENginelest,

AF/Atlas MA-3 Vernier Engine Tes t

NASA/Delta RS-27 Turbopump Tes t

NASA/Atlas MA-5 Turbopump Tes t

AF/Atlas MA-3 Turbopump Tes t

AFjMX Stage IV Propellant Loading

Itco PeriodFirm Forecasted Follow-on

2-83

1-84

11-83

4-83

4-83

1-84

4-83

1-84

11-83

2-84

6-85

8-86

6-85

6-856-85

1-83 thru 4-83 ,

6-856-85

8-86

`6-89

Page 4: z Rocketdyne Division · Reference: NASA Letter SA51-82-97, Input of Santa Susana Facility Closure, to D. J. Sanchini from J. A. Lovingood, dated 30 March 1982 Dear Jud: The NASA

NASA-OWNED SANTA SUSANA FACILITY ( AREA II )

CLOSURE IMPACT - UTILITIES & INSTALLATIONS

Water Supper

We l 1 = 13

Retain Area II Storage for require-ments of Areas I, III, and ESG .

Retain Area II storage for require-ments of Area I .

0N

WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

Retain Area II distribution forAreas I,`III, and ESG loop .

Retain Area II distribution forArea I requirements .

Retain Area II reservoir (R2A) -P/O NPDES discharge system permit .

Construct 500,000 gal . storage i nArea I and tie Area III to ES Gstorage .

See "Ponds and Reservoirs" .

Construct new 4" line from 500,00 0gal . storage to well #6 and extendto service road loop . Purchase orlease north service road line i nArea II .

See "Ponds and Reservoirs" .

Deactivate Area II reservoir (R2A )and construct new reservoir i nArea III but continue to dischargethru Area II channel . Also purchaseor lease reclaim distribution thr uArea II and provide spray disposa l

at ESG .

"Ti 11 L. ~r /a .-1 11-AV4

Page 5: z Rocketdyne Division · Reference: NASA Letter SA51-82-97, Input of Santa Susana Facility Closure, to D. J. Sanchini from J. A. Lovingood, dated 30 March 1982 Dear Jud: The NASA

NASA-OWNED SANTA SUSANA FACILITY (AREA 11 )

CLOSURE IMPACT - UTILITIES & INSTALLATIONS

SEWAGE TREATMENT SYSTEM

HIGH PRESSURE GASES

Helium Distributio n

Nitrogen Distributio n

Hydrogen Distribution

Hydrogen Compresso r

Nitrogen Compressor

HYDROGEN STORAGE (WHITE BALL )

SECURITY CONTROL CENTER

Retain for water management syste mand security control center .

Retain for support to Areas I and

Retain for support to Areas I and I I

Retain for support to Areas I an d

Retain for support to Areas I an d

Retain for support to Areas I and

Retain - Contains all emergenc ycorlmunications :

- Radioactive alarm systemFire alarm systemsSecurity intrusion systemsPublic address system sOil spill alarms

Deactivate Area II sub and refee d

from ESG or provide new sub in

Area III .

Purchase or lease existing lines .

Purchase or lease existing line sor install cascade system in Area III .

Purchase or lease existing lines .

Purchase or lease systems .

Purchase or lease systems .

Page 6: z Rocketdyne Division · Reference: NASA Letter SA51-82-97, Input of Santa Susana Facility Closure, to D. J. Sanchini from J. A. Lovingood, dated 30 March 1982 Dear Jud: The NASA

CAPABILITY

STORABLE PROPELLANTS AREA

May be continuing requirement t omonitor inactive treatment pond sunder RCRA regulations .

HAZARDOUS WASTE STORAGE Retain under "grandfathered" RCRA Construct new storace in Are at

ALTERNATE FUEL STORAGE FORCANOGA BOILERS 60,000 GAL . )

MACHINE/WELD SHOP

NASA-OWNED SANTA SUSANA FACILITY (AREA I I

CLOSURE IMPACT - UTILITIES & INSTALLATION S

perms . May not currently be possibl e

Retain for Canog a

Retain for SSFL support .

III .

under RCRA regulations for newsites .

-or-Store no hazardous waste i nexcess of 90 days not practical !

Relocate to other Rockewell stor-age facilities or install newstorage in Rockwell areas .

Relocate "reduced " machine shopto Area I Equipment Lab .

-or-Build new facilities at SSFL .

MAINTENANCE SHOPS/STORAGE Retain for SSFL-ESG support . Relocate to RockwellAND GARAGE Rocketdyne and ESG .

STORAGE AT CTL I I

GASOLINE DISPENSING, AREA I I

ROADS

Retain for storage .

Retain for SSFL- [SG support.

Retain for access, fire prevention ,and security (at reduced mainte-nance level) .

RECOMMENDATION

Retain, including treatment ponds Relocate westward to Area III .

-or-

areas a t

Build new facilities at SSFL .

Construct new warehouse .

Increase capacity of Area I system .

Page 7: z Rocketdyne Division · Reference: NASA Letter SA51-82-97, Input of Santa Susana Facility Closure, to D. J. Sanchini from J. A. Lovingood, dated 30 March 1982 Dear Jud: The NASA

r `~ PP' APP. ~, aptHE4DE~D are"

n eUemeat .OT -ILIAD ptt-sell for, 'O fAIC

r 'I~RS61VS USAF Pa,ei 3

ROAD . }(Re:'.e ~' alae ; ioQOVi~ as A Ii

Between Podtita 8~~ ). 3t)0 'rh.de aA~e~eat ftir FE'rA~r`.' sell over. -portl m of CM -TOAD between Padua.and E ce 14861-6 7 . ('hi Al 0 jmow as

(C)ARC,II R{?AI})(Ref Page 1 of Deed to U_ BASF . `--

(D) Be ycen Points 'C and ' 3etsseen data-'D :"D .aide ease: zT. for ROAD ;tou pes over portions ©pFLATS ROAM betveac points D and G'-and between ai € - - .e sd K ,an 18R561-67- { Thi road . a1e41 r kne9-,+u Via' TEST AREA ROAD . ) ( Ref . : page

.15 of to VSAF .(E) Betfegn Points E : 100', `ride ea.eesneat(`-- - _ ' - -7`-- for EGAD ses

, . filter COCA RCADbettaeer. points and. M 5=67{ (Ref . : PN3r 17 of Deed to USAF .

7- ~F )Between Points F : 1Gc vide eesenertor ROKD p+u oses over .ALFA 4Ge

between Peinte G and I obi . C7Page 16 of Deed to DSAF . )

OBSE't ATION ROAD OR 61►Y INE DRI7T : Itja~ould b, noted that NA,, i=s N0 ftsemesover Us; rF property to or from five seeticY-- - of this road that is sbo;«4 0 on this SkeT4 !W)Petween Points k' : 20' wide f~- _; easement ~o_c°pve;~ance of WATER per center line ' `

described on. .. 4rar t page 19 of -USAF Deed .

2L fi$i E 4~,S T$ : faeeme*ti of2C' width 'within ee~acf the above 1Lb'w4,e ' road easements .

:.TRIG E IYl7E & S T~SXi ::rt. gracsEanents Cr LG

cthe abot-e 100' wide easemeuts~f

NOTESttibg of easements is 'ty icsl o 3p a y .

-'4e seed fo: 1e- aile 'aoe3 el~ t lac bcat its2-)'. The above eas a eme are pera z ent and art4ar .bo~esczusive use . .

3) ' The Q;mntot has the RIGET but not t..hcli et ton" rm..ntain the roads ideati.h lle above fig) ,

} All acpve easements and rights rnn t t,!!any or all-portions of Orantorc eurretj-ors future property which Would benefit,f'~l a,,..m

A. C. IV 1

U .O AFEO,RP-- 31.,01"01 for refere%cebrRegard Syrveys -G >& .

[ 5) Majority, of, above easemeats are NPr -refl.e,eted. on the D/561+ PFa, Ae'~erence_

arri

4i; 0, o 'RT '

Page 8: z Rocketdyne Division · Reference: NASA Letter SA51-82-97, Input of Santa Susana Facility Closure, to D. J. Sanchini from J. A. Lovingood, dated 30 March 1982 Dear Jud: The NASA

P

ode 'emtnt 'AX?r ieefofar -- pur-' ldQ SAD 4f A {}De - R AD on PareUSAF ei 3~r

~'ne l ~.R56i. - : ` hfi ro•1'b. ova-

as AREA 11ROAD-)(Rao

e? . : e lk S. D mr$ nos:. } Betveer. PoYats . $= i04'` iic3t tb. etserrt for`P .

.., Poses, Over. tierti rm "t' rn. aor, A nVWAX 141$8861-67 road ls-A a o know as A.PWAII ROA

D )D}! Ref. : 'Pa e 114g of Deed to UEAP ).

tC) & (D) Btbireen Po ints "C and`Betiree., Pe1nts D . ,1pr ,Wi3E essIm" for RC?t D, lxi osea oven portiaps of~ROAA betveec points D and a -and , between G-11 &2d K an OFSo1-57 jT. ts raad

(E) Bet-4er' POInte E 100' -side ee. ez3t

kndwn L TES. AREA RbAD . } ( Ref . • Fie2-5 0` Deets toCSC'

)

fOr I,C~AD ses ohter COCt - ROADeteer point ad M.s aR5~1 (-a'j

'(Ref . : Pam 17 of Dead to U$AF .).

) Betrre-n Pit F 1ons :00' vide easementor r 01~ u s-pose over ALFA ROADe weer: Pcint6 v and 'i

(P.ef' . : Pace 16 of Deed to tISA , )d) Oc'Q -+ ;' 1PIC ROAD OR SKYLINE DRIVE : Itvu?:, PEI, noted tih 4IA; ba:. .as NQ eeaea~et~Zover USAF property to Cr from the seet:.c

of This roal that is ahoxxc on this skerc! e: - w e e n Points W : 20' wide egee r t fu rconveyance of WAT C per center linedescribed on page 1,0 of USAF Deed ,

$ : Ea c emenj of2C' tridth wit in each of tae Abore 100 '

0y ~0 t7 t . Ft:i~rtwaw ofthe a" ti 1 :

a:..4" TPJC & 'FEi._sr'OD E 1.'E tZ BYS'I'1 Etiv` tSescen+a

e18 r) US .amide ron3

e 00 wide eaoemezsts

~a _ float i,arts(2) .The above easements a re 1>e2-mLef and axe

for non-exclueive use .{ 3) The Grantor ,has the RIGHT, but not th e I ±

b otlilmtion zaaiDtai t

-' ec teed for 3etaile az~d a -+ I

Plotting of ease entz is typical manly .s

, oe sonde identi .fieQ above a B),(C}r( },(E) aad el?) ,

RP" U . G AGrD rRP- 3GOt, o/ for refuerxadRecard servers E fps.

port ans o1 trantors curret tor, future property xhie .i could benefit

' C4) Alla;cave easements and rights run "vt' or all

frog same .5) Majority of above sements are NOT .

rerlected on t4 e D/561 PFL Re'erpztr~Wray