zenterprise reduces cost per workload

40
zEnterprise Economics Dr. John Shedletsky VP, Competitive Technology

Upload: dkang

Post on 21-Jan-2015

2.598 views

Category:

Education


2 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: zEnterprise Reduces Cost Per Workload

zEnterprise Economics

Dr. John ShedletskyVP, Competitive Technology

Page 2: zEnterprise Reduces Cost Per Workload

zEnterprise Economics - IBM SWG CPO - Mar 2011 2

COST PER WORKLOAD

Accurately allocating cost in a virtualized environment

New metric for the age of Smarter Computing

Page 3: zEnterprise Reduces Cost Per Workload

zEnterprise Economics - IBM SWG CPO - Mar 2011 3

Smarter Computing With zEnterprise

Platforms Optimized For Different Workloads

Consistent Structured Management

Lowest Cost Per Workload

Best fit for workload Consistent structured practices

Lowest Cost Of Lowest Cost Of Operation Per Operation Per

WorkloadWorkload

Lowest Cost Of Lowest Cost Of Acquisition Per Acquisition Per

WorkloadWorkload

Linuxz/VM AIXz/OS

Page 4: zEnterprise Reduces Cost Per Workload

zEnterprise Economics - IBM SWG CPO - Mar 2011 4

Agenda

Platforms Optimized For Different Workloads

Consistent Structured Management

Right fit for workload

Lowest cost per workload

Consistent structured practices

Lowest labor costs

Linuxz/VM AIXz/OS

Cost Per WorkloadExamples

Consolidate standalone workloadsClaims processing Consolidate hybrid front ends

Why zBX

is better than do-it-yourself

zManager labor savingsBenefits of workload management

Page 5: zEnterprise Reduces Cost Per Workload

zEnterprise Economics - IBM SWG CPO - Mar 2011 5

Consolidating Workloads With Heavy I/O Requirements

Workloads

Benchmark to determine which platform provides

the lowest TCA over 3 years

IBM WebSphere NDMonitoring softwareOn 4 core “Older” Intel

Online banking workloads, each driving 22

transactions per second, with 1 MB I/O per

transaction

10 workloads per Intel blade

PowerVM

on PS701 8 core Blade

$14,325 per workload

240 workloads per 32-way z/VM

15 workloads per POWER7 blade

$21,413 per workload

z/VM on zEnterprise CPF32 IFLs

$14,052 per workload

Virtualized on Intel 8 core Blade

I/O bandwidthlarge scale poolConsolidation ratios derived from IBM internal studies. z196 32-way performance

projected from z196 8-way and z10 32-way measurements. zBX

with x blades is a statement of direction only. Results may vary based on customer workload profiles/characteristics. Prices will vary by country.

Page 6: zEnterprise Reduces Cost Per Workload

zEnterprise Economics - IBM SWG CPO - Mar 2011 6

Consolidating Heavy Workloads

Workloads

Benchmark to determine which platform provides

the lowest TCA over 3 years

IBM WebSphere NDMonitoring softwareOn 8 core Nehalem servers

Online banking workloads, each driving 460

transactions per second with light I/O

1 workload per Intel blade

PowerVM

on PS701 8 core Blade$107,437 per

workload

23 workloads per 32-way z/VM

2 workloads per POWER7 blade

$214,133 per workload

z/VM on zEnterprise CEC32 IFLs

$146,631 per workload

Virtualized on Intel 8 core Blade

more parallelthreads

Consolidation ratios derived from IBM internal studies. z196 32-way performance projected from z196 8-way and z10 32-way measurements. zBX

with x blades is a statement of direction only. Results may vary based on customer workload profiles/characteristics. Prices will vary by country.

Page 7: zEnterprise Reduces Cost Per Workload

zEnterprise Economics - IBM SWG CPO - Mar 2011 7

Consolidating Light Workloads

Workloads

Benchmark to determine which platform provides

the lowest TCA over 3 years

IBM WebSphere NDMonitoring softwareOn 4 core “Older” Intel

Online banking workloads, each driving 22 transactions

per second with light I/O

36 workloads per Intel blade

PowerVM

on PS701 8 core Blade

$6,320 per workload

270 workloads per 32-way z/VM

34 workloads per POWER7 blade

Virtualized on Intel 8 core Blade

$5,948 per workload

z/VM on zEnterprise CEC32 IFLs

$12,491 per workload

Fast low cost threads

Consolidation ratios derived from IBM internal studies. z196 32-way performance projected from z196 8-way and z10 32-way measurements. zBX

with x blades is a statement of direction only. Results may vary based on customer workload profiles/characteristics. Prices will vary by country.

Page 8: zEnterprise Reduces Cost Per Workload

zEnterprise Economics - IBM SWG CPO - Mar 2011 88

Cost Per Workload Reveals True Value

1

zEnterpriseBest fit

192 cores total

Cost of Hardware

Cost of Software

Cost per Workload

$1.7M $9.8M $23.0K

$2.7M $4.7M $15.0K

True Value: Cost Per Workload

Cost Of Hardware Is Misleading

Note: 3yr TCA. CPO benchmarks. Equal mix of WAS ND and DB2 workloads. List prices.

56 Intel Blades(8 cores per blade)

448 cores total

25 heavy workloads240 heavy

I/O Workloads

235 light workloads

Run 500 workloads

Page 9: zEnterprise Reduces Cost Per Workload

zEnterprise Economics - IBM SWG CPO - Mar 2011 9

Agenda

Platforms Optimized For Different Workloads

Consistent Structured Management

Right fit for workload

Lowest cost per workload

Consistent structured practices

Lowest labor costs

Linuxz/VM AIXz/OS

Cost Per WorkloadExamples

Consolidate standalone workloadsClaims processing Consolidate hybrid front ends

Why zBX

is better than do-it-yourself

zManager labor savingsBenefits of workload management

Page 10: zEnterprise Reduces Cost Per Workload

zEnterprise Economics - IBM SWG CPO - Mar 2011 10

Customer Case Study – Insurance Claim Processing Company

Primary Stable BusinessGovernment Insurance Claims ProcessingMedicare/Medicaid/Defense/State

Growth BusinessCommercial Claims ProcessingTwo Existing Commercial Claims Processing Systems

Homegrown CICS/DB2 Application on Mainframe−

ISV 3rd-party Package running on HPUX

Which platform is the low-cost option for future growth in commercial claims?

10

Page 11: zEnterprise Reduces Cost Per Workload

zEnterprise Economics - IBM SWG CPO - Mar 2011 11

Two Commercial Claims Processing Systems

HP 9000 Superdome

rp4440HP Integrity rx6600

HP Servers + ISV IBM System z CICS/DB2

HP 9000 Superdome

rp5470HP Integrity rx6600

Production Servers

Dev/Test Servers

Total MIPS 11,302

MIPS Used for commercial claims processing production/dev/test 2418

Claims per year 327,652 Claims per year 4,056,000

Which system costs less for

future growth?

Buy Build

Calculate cost per workload

Page 12: zEnterprise Reduces Cost Per Workload

zEnterprise Economics - IBM SWG CPO - Mar 2011 12

Allocated Annual Costs For Two SystemsMainframe Distributed

Hardware 1,302,205 87,806

Hardware Maint 315,548

Software IBM MLC 4,842,384

Software Non IBM OTC 647,843 196,468

Software Non IBM MLC 5,027,936

Storage 877,158

Network 418,755

Support Staff 2,324,623 257,289

Platform + Staff Total 15,756,452 541,563

Platform + Staff Claims Allocation 3,371,880 (21.4%) 541,563 (100%)

Billing Center 1,611,650

Call Center 2,920,090

Development 1,907,382

Total 9,811,002 541,563

Claims Processed 4,056,000 327,652

$ Per Claim 2.42 0.87

Provided by customer finance department

Page 13: zEnterprise Reduces Cost Per Workload

zEnterprise Economics - IBM SWG CPO - Mar 2011 13

Allocated Annual Costs For Two SystemsMainframe Distributed

Hardware 1,302,205 87,806

Hardware Maint 315,548

Software IBM MLC 4,842,384

Software Non IBM OTC 647,843 196,468

Software Non IBM MLC 5,027,936

Storage 877,158

Network 418,755

Support Staff 2,324,623 257,289

Platform + Staff Total 15,756,452 541,563

Platform + Staff Claims Allocation 3,371,880 (21.4%) 541,563 (100%)

Billing Center 1,611,650

Call Center 2,920,090

Development 1,907,382

Total 9,811,002 541,563

Claims Processed 4,056,000 327,652

$ Per Claim 2.42 0.87

Provided by customer finance department

Mainframe costs easily identified, distributed costs difficult to identify

Page 14: zEnterprise Reduces Cost Per Workload

zEnterprise Economics - IBM SWG CPO - Mar 2011 14

Allocated Annual Costs For Two SystemsMainframe Distributed

Hardware 1,302,205 87,806

Hardware Maint 315,548

Software IBM MLC 4,842,384

Software Non IBM OTC 647,843 196,468

Software Non IBM MLC 5,027,936

Storage 877,158

Network 418,755

Support Staff 2,324,623 257,289

Platform + Staff Total 15,756,452 541,563

Platform + Staff Claims Allocation 3,371,880 (21.4%) 541,563 (100%)

Billing Center 1,611,650

Call Center 2,920,090

Development 1,907,382

Total 9,811,002 541,563

Claims Processed 4,056,000 327,652

$ Per Claim 2.42 0.87

Provided by customer finance department

Mainframe costs easily identified, distributed costs difficult to identify

Billing and Call center costs allocated to mainframe, but would be the same for either option

Page 15: zEnterprise Reduces Cost Per Workload

zEnterprise Economics - IBM SWG CPO - Mar 2011 15

Allocated Annual Costs For Two SystemsMainframe Distributed

Hardware 1,302,205 87,806

Hardware Maint 315,548

Software IBM MLC 4,842,384

Software Non IBM OTC 647,843 196,468

Software Non IBM MLC 5,027,936

Storage 877,158

Network 418,755

Support Staff 2,324,623 257,289

Platform + Staff Total 15,756,452 541,563

Platform + Staff Claims Allocation 3,371,880 (21.4%) 541,563 (100%)

Billing Center 1,611,650

Call Center 2,920,090

Development 1,907,382

Total 9,811,002 541,563

Claims Processed 4,056,000 327,652

$ Per Claim 2.42 0.87

Provided by customer finance department

Mainframe costs easily identified, distributed costs difficult to identify

Billing and Call center costs allocated to mainframe, but would be the same for either option

Development still required to customize packaged software for each new contract

Page 16: zEnterprise Reduces Cost Per Workload

zEnterprise Economics - IBM SWG CPO - Mar 2011 16

True Workload Costs For Either OptionMainframe Distributed

Hardware 1,302,205 87,806

Hardware Maint 315,548

Software IBM MLC 4,842,384

Software Non IBM OTC 647,843 196,468

Software Non IBM MLC 5,027,936

Storage 877,158 ?

Network 418,755 ?

Support Staff 2,324,623 257,289

Platform + Staff Total 15,756,452 541,563

Platform + Staff Claims Allocation 3,371,880 (21.4%) 541,563 (100%)

Billing Center same same

Call Center same same

Development 1,907,382 123,031

Total 5,279,262 664,594

Claims Processed 4,056,000 327,652

$ Per Claim 1.30 2.03Mainframe has lower cost per workload

Page 17: zEnterprise Reduces Cost Per Workload

zEnterprise Economics - IBM SWG CPO - Mar 2011 17

A Note On Support Staff Annual Costs

HP 9000 Superdome

rp4440HP Integrity rx6600

HP Servers + ISV IBM System z CICS/DB2

HP 9000 Superdome

rp5470HP Integrity rx6600

Production Servers

Dev/Test Servers

Total MIPS 11,302

MIPS Used for commercial claims processing production/dev/test 2418

Claims per year 327,652 Claims per year 4,056,000

$0.12 per claim

$0.79 per claim

Mainframe support staff has

6.6x better productivity

Page 18: zEnterprise Reduces Cost Per Workload

zEnterprise Economics - IBM SWG CPO - Mar 2011 18

A Note On Processing Equivalence

Current Computing Capacity Allocated For Distributed is 38918 RPE’s

Using the Scaling Factor (Claims/Sec Distributed / Claims/Sec Mainframe) we calculate that processing the equivalent Claims volume on the mainframe would require only 195.46 MIPS

This gives us an RPE/MIPS factor of 199.10 (Distributed capacity to Mainframe capacity ratio)

We have studied Offloads that range from 122 RPE/MIPS to 670 RPE/MIPS

18

Page 19: zEnterprise Reduces Cost Per Workload

zEnterprise Economics - IBM SWG CPO - Mar 2011 19

Agenda

Platforms Optimized For Different Workloads

Consistent Structured Management

Right fit for workload

Lowest cost per workload

Consistent structured practices

Lowest labor costs

Linuxz/VM AIXz/OS

Cost Per WorkloadExamples

Consolidate standalone workloadsClaims processing Consolidate hybrid front ends

Why zBX

is better than do-it-yourself

zManager labor savingsBenefits of workload management

Page 20: zEnterprise Reduces Cost Per Workload

zEnterprise Economics - IBM SWG CPO - Mar 2011 20

Collapse Web Front End Workloads Into zEnterprise Platform

AIX on Power Blade

DataPower

XI50z

z/OS

z/OSz/OS

CICS/DB2CICS/DB2

AIXAIX

WASWAS ESBESB

zEnterprise z196

zEnterprise BladeCenter

Extension (xBX)

Web facing front-end

Messagehub

CICS/DB2core system

Run as ensemble of virtual servers

Unified management of virtual machines

Manage ensemble as a single workload with service goals

Assign best fit to Power blade and XI50z for lowest cost per workload

Embedded pre-configured data network

Page 21: zEnterprise Reduces Cost Per Workload

zEnterprise Economics - IBM SWG CPO - Mar 2011 21zEnterprise Economics - IBM SWG CPO - Feb. 2011 2121

492 messages per sec$764 per mps

5,117 messages per sec$33 per mps

Linux

OSB

DataPowerXI50z

messages messages

DataPower XI50z – Built For Purpose Appliance

Enterprise Service Bus benchmark comparison

DataPower XI50z in zBX

Microsoft BizTalk ServerWindows on Intel Server

4 sockets, 32 cores128 GB

Tests consists of measuring maximum throughput of ESB while performing a variety of message mediation workloads: pass-through, routing, transformation, and schema validation

5,839 messages per sec$120 per mps

Oracle Service BusOracle Linux on HP DL380

2 sockets, 12 cores128 GB

Windows

BizTalkServer

HS 22, 8 cores

Page 22: zEnterprise Reduces Cost Per Workload

zEnterprise Economics - IBM SWG CPO - Mar 2011 22

Web Front Ends Cost 58% Less On zEnterprise

28 workloads each driving

1975 tps

Web Facing

Competitive App Server57 SPARC T3-1B blades

in SUN racks2 HP DL380 servers

(for ESB)936 cores total

WebSphere App Server28 POWER7 blades2 DataPower

XI50zin zBX

224 cores total

Power Blades in zBX

SPARC T544032 core servers

HP DL380 servers(for ESB)

$11.7M3yr TCA HW+SW

$4.9M3yr TCA HW+SW

Upgrade to new SPARC T3

hardware

28 front end applications on older SPARC T2+ servers

Page 23: zEnterprise Reduces Cost Per Workload

zEnterprise Economics - IBM SWG CPO - Mar 2011 23

Web Front Ends Cost 58% Less On zEnterprise

Competitive App Server57 SPARC T3-1B blades

in SUN racks2 HP DL380 servers

(for ESB)936 cores total

WebSphere App Server28 POWER7 blades2 DataPower

XI50zin zBX

224 cores total

Power Blades in zBX

$11.7M3yr TCA HW+SW

$4.9M3yr TCA HW+SW

Upgrade to new SPARC T3

hardware

Why?WAS on PS701 delivers 1.84x processing capacity

Competitive Application Server cannot effectively utilize the threads available in T3 blade

DataPower better price/performanceNeed to over provision SPARC T3 since no zManager

Page 24: zEnterprise Reduces Cost Per Workload

zEnterprise Economics - IBM SWG CPO - Mar 2011 24

SAP Applications Cost 20% Less On zEnterprise

20 workloads

SAP

38 SPARC T3-1B blades in SUN rack

608 cores total

23 POWER7 blades in zBX

184 cores total

Upgrade to new SPARC T3

hardware

z196zBX

z196T3-1B

20SPARC T544032 core servers

538,120 total SAPs640 cores total

$1.2M3yr TCA HW+SW

$0.97M3yr TCA HW+SW

Power Blades in zBX

20 front end SAP applications on older SPARC T2+ servers

Page 25: zEnterprise Reduces Cost Per Workload

zEnterprise Economics - IBM SWG CPO - Mar 2011 25

Agenda

Platforms Optimized For Different Workloads

Consistent Structured Management

Right fit for workload

Lowest cost per workload

Consistent structured practices

Lowest labor costs

Linuxz/VM AIXz/OS

Cost Per WorkloadExamples

Claims processing Consolidate standalone workloadsConsolidate hybrid front ends

Why zBX

is better than do-it-yourself

zManager labor savingsBenefits of workload management

Page 26: zEnterprise Reduces Cost Per Workload

zEnterprise Economics - IBM SWG CPO - Mar 2011 26

72 workloads

20 workloads

Web Facing

SAP

POWER7 blades in BladeCenter

chassis

POWER7 bladesin zBX

racks with zManager

(Manage+Automate)zEnterprise

Do-It-Yourself

Compare The Costs For 92 Hybrid Workloads

I see how fit for purpose can cut costs, but why do I need zBX

racks?

Can’t I just use BladeCenters to do it

myself?

Page 27: zEnterprise Reduces Cost Per Workload

zEnterprise Economics - IBM SWG CPO - Mar 2011 27

0

50

100150

200

250

300

350400

450

500

2000/01 2007/08

Year

Intel - Virtual Servers/FTE z/OS - MIPS/FTE

Labor Cost Trends Favor A Centralized Structured Approach To Management

Large scale consolidation and consistent structured management practices

drive increases in labor productivity

Small scale consolidation with ad hoc management achieves

lesser gains

The more workloads you consolidate and manage with consistent structured practices…

the lower the management labor costSource: IBM Scorpion Studies and IDC Three Data Centers –

One Vision.PDF

(IDC, 2010)

3.9x Improvement

18x I

mprov

emen

t

Page 28: zEnterprise Reduces Cost Per Workload

zEnterprise Economics - IBM SWG CPO - Mar 2011 28

Process Typical Distributed Management Practices

zManager

Asset Management

Discover assets with ad hoc methodsManual entitlement management

Automated discovery and management of entitlement assets

Deployment Management

Manually configure hypervisor and build networks

Automated deployment of hypervisor and attachment to integrated networks

Security Management

Different ways to manage administrator access

Centralized, fine-grained administrator access management

Change Management

No visibility into impact of changes Track dependencies for change impact

Capacity and Performance Management

No end-to-end transaction monitoringManually adjust CPU resources to meet changing workload demands

End-to-end transaction monitoring to isolate issuesAutomatic CPU resource adjustments to meet changing workload demands

zManager Provides Structured Management For zEnterprise Virtual Environments

Page 29: zEnterprise Reduces Cost Per Workload

zEnterprise Economics - IBM SWG CPO - Mar 2011 29

DIY Tasks (per Blade) Elapsed Time Labor TimeInitial communication setup & educationBoot VIOS disc & install (creates LPAR for VIOS automatically)Configure VIOS networkingCreate new storage pool for LPARsInstall VIOS service fix packs

6 min 26 sec37 min 59 sec2 min 49 sec35 sec61 min 5 sec

6 min 26 sec36 min2 min 49 sec35 sec20 sec

TOTAL TIME 1 hr 48 min 52 sec 46 min 10 sec

zManager Tasks (per Blade) Elapsed Time Labor TimeAdd entitlement for a blade 90 min 92 sec

TOTAL TIME 1 hr 30 min 1 min 32 sec

Hypervisor Setup And Configuration Lab Test – Do-It-Yourself vs. zManager

Source: IBM CPO Internal Study

97% reductionin labor time

Page 30: zEnterprise Reduces Cost Per Workload

zEnterprise Economics - IBM SWG CPO - Mar 2011 30

Network Setup And Configuration Lab Test – Do-It-Yourself vs. zManager

Do-It-Yourself Tasks (for two BladeCenters) Elapsed/Labor TimePlanning (includes time to go over docs, etc)CablingAMM ConfigurationLogical Configuration (L2)Blades network configurationTestingDocumenting the configuration

5 hrs2 hrs2 hrs8 hrs4 hrs2 hrs3 hrs

TOTAL TIME 26 hrs

zManager Tasks (for two BladeCenters) Elapsed/Labor TimePlanningCabling (pre-cabled in zBX)AMM Configuration (done in zBX)Logical configuration (L2)Blades network configurationTesting (pre-tested)Documenting the configuration (all part of zManager)

3 hrs0 hrs0 hrs30 mins1 hr 30 mins0 hrs0 hrs

TOTAL TIME 5 hrs

Source: IBM CPO Internal Study

81% reductionin labor time

Page 31: zEnterprise Reduces Cost Per Workload

zEnterprise Economics - IBM SWG CPO - Mar 2011 31

Performance Manager Lab Test – Automatic Allocation Of CPU Resource

zManager monitors virtual machine performance and automatically adjusts CPU resources as needed

Considers priority and performance relative to service level agreement goals

Reduces the need to over-provision CPU resources

Workload 2 (W2)

Workload 1 (W1)

2. Performance Manager is turned on. zManager

detects W1 is underperforming.

4. W1 reaches performance goal.

3. Over time, zManager

adjusts CPU resources, taking from W2 and giving to W1.

15 minutes

1. No performance management. W1 is underperforming, and W2 is over-

performing.

Goal

Time

Source: IBM CPO Internal Study

Page 32: zEnterprise Reduces Cost Per Workload

zEnterprise Economics - IBM SWG CPO - Mar 2011 32

zManager Performance Management Reduces Need To Overprovision CPU Resource

Without zManager With zManager

Performance manager enables trading off resource from lower priority workload, avoiding the need to overprovision

Must overprovision CPU resource for both workloads by 10% to handle unexpected spike in demand

Workload 2 Workload 2

Workload 1 Workload 1

11%

11%

11%

11%

13.2%

Unexpected 20% spike in average demand

Aver

age

utiliz

atio

n

100%

110%

8.8%

Performance manager reduces entitlement by

20%

13.2%

Unexpected 20% spike in average demand, Performance Manager increases entitlement by 20%

Tota

l CPU

Res

ourc

e N

eede

d

100%

Aver

age

utiliz

atio

nTo

tal C

PU R

esou

rce

Nee

ded

10% more CPU resources needed

No additional CPU resources needed

No additional CPUresource needed

Page 33: zEnterprise Reduces Cost Per Workload

zEnterprise Economics - IBM SWG CPO - Mar 2011 33

72 workloads

20 workloads

Web Facing

Data Processing

62POWER7 blades in 5 BladeCenter

chassis

56POWER7 blades

in two zBX

racks with zManager

(Manage+Automate)

72 Web facing hybrid applications, 2 per POWER7 blades20 SAP hybrid applications, 1 per POWER7 blade. DIY blades over provisioned by 10% because no zManager

performance manager Cost of CICS/DB2 and SAP components of workloads not includedLabor costs are for blade management onlyLabor rate $159,600 per year

zEnterprise

Do-It-Yourself

Blades Cost of Acquisition $7,325K

Labor $ 987K

Total (3yr) $8,312K

$30.1K per workload per year

$27.9K

per workload per year

zBX

Cost of Acquisition $6,994K

Labor $ 714K

Total (3yr) $7,708K

28%

less labor cost and 7% less cost per workload

Results may vary based on customer workload profiles/characteristics. Prices will vary by country.

Case Study: Compare The Costs For 92 Hybrid Workloads

Page 34: zEnterprise Reduces Cost Per Workload

zEnterprise Economics - IBM SWG CPO - Mar 2011 34

zManager Labor Reduction Benefits

Deployment Management

Reduced by 33%

Capacity/PerformanceManagement

Reduced by 52%

Change Management

Asset Management

Reduced by 9%

Security Management Reducedby 20%

Reducedby 41%

4289 total hours per year reduced by 28% to 3104 hours per year

Automatic setup and configuration of the hypervisor and out-of-the-

box networks

Automation to isolate and fix issues

Automated discovery, entitlement management

Centralized fine-grain administrator access control

Standardization of images and firmware, visibility into relationships among resources

Page 35: zEnterprise Reduces Cost Per Workload

zEnterprise Economics - IBM SWG CPO - Mar 2011 35

Summary

Cost per workload is the key metric for the new IT economics

Fit for purpose reduces cost of acquisition per workload

zEnterprise integrated management reduces cost of labor per workload

Page 36: zEnterprise Reduces Cost Per Workload

36© 2011 International Business Machines Corporation36

Smarter Computing: System z Analyst Summit

Thank you! ibm.com/smartercomputing

Page 37: zEnterprise Reduces Cost Per Workload

37© 2011 International Business Machines Corporation37

Smarter Computing: System z Analyst Summit

Trademarks and disclaimersIntel, Intel logo, Intel Inside, Intel Inside logo, Intel Centrino, Intel Centrino

logo, Celeron, Intel Xeon, Intel SpeedStep, Itanium, and Pentium are trademarks or registered trademarks of Intel Corporation or its subsidiaries in the United States and other countries./ Linux is a registered trademark of Linus

Torvalds

in the United States, other countries, or both. Microsoft, Windows, Windows NT, and the Windows logo are trademarks of Microsoft Corporation in the United States, other countries, or both. IT Infrastructure Library is a registered trademark of the Central Computer and Telecommunications Agency which is now part of the Office of Government Commerce. ITIL is a registered trademark, and a registered community trademark of the Office of Government Commerce, and is

registered in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. UNIX is a registered trademark of The Open Group in the United States and other countries. Java and all Java-based trademarks and logos are trademarks or registered trademarks of Oracle and/or its affiliates. Other company, product, or service

names may be trademarks or service marks of others. Information

is provided "AS IS" without warranty of any kind.

The customer examples described are presented as illustrations of how those customers have used IBM products and the results they may have achieved. Actual environmental costs and performance characteristics may vary by customer.

Information concerning non-IBM products was obtained from a supplier of these products, published announcement material, or other publicly available sources and does not constitute an endorsement of such products by IBM. Sources for non-IBM list prices and performance numbers are taken from publicly available information, including vendor announcements and vendor

worldwide homepages. IBM has not tested these products and cannot confirm the accuracy of performance, capability, or any other claims related to non-IBM products. Questions on the capability of non-IBM products should be addressed to the supplier of those products.

All statements regarding IBM future direction and intent are subject to change or withdrawal without notice, and represent goals

and objectives only.

Some information addresses anticipated future capabilities. Such

information is not intended as a definitive statement of a commitment to specific levels of performance, function or delivery schedules with respect to any future products. Such commitments are only made in IBM product announcements. The information is presented here to communicate IBM's current investment and development activities as a good faith effort to help with

our customers' future planning.

Performance is based on measurements and projections using standard IBM benchmarks in a controlled environment. The actual throughput or performance that any user will experience will vary depending upon considerations such as the amount of multiprogramming in the user's job stream, the I/O configuration, the storage configuration, and the workload processed. Therefore, no assurance can be given that an individual user will achieve throughput or performance improvements equivalent to the ratios stated here.

Prices are suggested U.S. list prices and are subject to change without notice. Starting price may not include a hard drive, operating system or other features. Contact your IBM representative or Business Partner for the most current pricing in your geography.

Photographs shown may be engineering prototypes. Changes may be incorporated in production models.

© IBM Corporation 2011. All rights reserved.References in this document to IBM products or services do not imply that IBM intends to make them available in every country.

Trademarks of International Business Machines Corporation in the

United States, other countries, or both can be found on the World Wide Web at http://www.ibm.com/legal/copytrade.shtml.

Page 38: zEnterprise Reduces Cost Per Workload

zEnterprise Economics - IBM SWG CPO - Mar 2011 38

Backup

Page 39: zEnterprise Reduces Cost Per Workload

zEnterprise Economics - IBM SWG CPO - Mar 2011 39

Web Workloads - Performance Data

Server Description Cores RPE RPE2 TPS(Measured)

TPS(Calculated)

T5440 SPARCT2+32 core

Sun SPARC Enterprise T5440 (4U) UltraSPARC T2+ 1.6GHz 4MB (4ch/32co)

32 102,617 21,580 5,300 Max throughput

with multi JVM run using Solaris containers

T3-1B 16 core

Oracle SPARC T3-1B SPARC T3 1.65GHz (1ch/16co)

16 61,249 11,520 2829 Calculated as

5300*(11520/21580)

Power 7108 core

Power 710 Express (2U) Power7 3.55GHz (1ch/8co)

8 60,208 14,920 5,670

PS7018 core

IBM BladeCenter

PS701 Express Power7 3.0GHz (1ch/8co)

8 53,189 13,730 5218Calculated as

5670*(13730/14920)

WAS on PS701 versus WLS on T3-1B is 1.84x WLS on T5440 versus WLS on T3-1B is 1.87xWLS on T5440 versus WAS on PS701 is nearly 1x

Page 40: zEnterprise Reduces Cost Per Workload

zEnterprise Economics - IBM SWG CPO - Mar 2011 40

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

4500

5000

Change Mgmt

Security Mgmt

Asset Mgmt

Capacity/Perf Mgmt

Deployment MgmtYear

ly L

abor

Hou

rs

zEnterpriseDo-It-Yourself

28%fewer labor

hours

Case Study: zEnterprise Reduces Infrastructure Labor Hours