zero emission bus technology challenges fall... · zero emission bus technology challenges ....

20
ZERO EMISSION BUS TECHNOLOGY CHALLENGES Lifecycle Cost Modeling and the problem with electric rates Steve Miller Chair California Transit Association Zero Emission Bus Task Force CTA Annual Fall Conference – November 19, 2015

Upload: others

Post on 18-Jan-2021

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: ZERO EMISSION BUS TECHNOLOGY CHALLENGES Fall... · ZERO EMISSION BUS TECHNOLOGY CHALLENGES . Lifecycle Cost Modeling . and the problem with electric rates . Steve Miller . Chair

ZERO EMISSION BUS TECHNOLOGY CHALLENGES

Lifecycle Cost Modeling

and the problem with electric rates

Steve Miller Chair California Transit Association Zero Emission Bus Task Force

CTA Annual Fall Conference – November 19, 2015

Page 2: ZERO EMISSION BUS TECHNOLOGY CHALLENGES Fall... · ZERO EMISSION BUS TECHNOLOGY CHALLENGES . Lifecycle Cost Modeling . and the problem with electric rates . Steve Miller . Chair

Critical Analysis

Lifecycle Cost Model (LCCM)

Infrastructure Rolling Stock

Fuel Maintenance

Lifecycle Cost

Page 3: ZERO EMISSION BUS TECHNOLOGY CHALLENGES Fall... · ZERO EMISSION BUS TECHNOLOGY CHALLENGES . Lifecycle Cost Modeling . and the problem with electric rates . Steve Miller . Chair

Lifecycle Cost Model

Has never been an easy task More difficult for ZEB Particularly challenging for Battery Electric Important to the success of your project Critically important to the Advanced Clean Transit (ACT) discussion

Page 4: ZERO EMISSION BUS TECHNOLOGY CHALLENGES Fall... · ZERO EMISSION BUS TECHNOLOGY CHALLENGES . Lifecycle Cost Modeling . and the problem with electric rates . Steve Miller . Chair
Page 5: ZERO EMISSION BUS TECHNOLOGY CHALLENGES Fall... · ZERO EMISSION BUS TECHNOLOGY CHALLENGES . Lifecycle Cost Modeling . and the problem with electric rates . Steve Miller . Chair

Assumptions: Coaches Purchased FY2017: 67 40 Foot

10% PURCHASE REQUIREMENT ANALYSIS - 20 YEAR PROJECTION Coaches Purchased FY2025: 23 45 Foot

Coaches Purchased FY2027: 32 45 Foot Including Cost of Capital and Inflation Coaches Purchased FY2029: 25 45 Foot

Coaches Purchased FY2031: 67 40 Foot

CURRENT PRICE MODEL Discount Rate: 3.0%

Inflation Rate: 2.0% Diesel Current Price - Inflation Only

Hydrogen Current Price- Inflation Only

Diesel Hybrid FCB

Bus Purchase Cost 40' 500,000 720,000 1,200,000

Bus Purchase Cost 45' 650,000 900,000 1,400,000

Fuel Cost 2.11 2.11 9.10

Fuel Station O&M 1.43

Compression Electrical

Projected MPG/MPkg 4.00 5.00 6.40

Annual Mileage 40' Bus 43,000 43,000 43,000

Annual Mileage 45' Bus 28,000 28,000 28,000

Projected Maint Cost/Mile 0.84 0.71 1.33

Results: Projected Fuel Cost/Mile 0.53 0.42 1.65

Projected Total Cost/Mile 1.37 1.13 2.98

Annual Fuel Cost 40' Bus 22,682.50 18,146.00 70,748.44

Annual Fuel Cost 45' Bus 14,770.00 11,816.00 46,068.75

Annual Maint Cost 40' Bus 36,120.00 30,530.00 57,190.00

Annual Maint Cost 45' Bus 23,520.00 19,880.00 37,240.00

FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 FY2030 FY2031 FY2032 FY2033 FY2034 FY2035 FY2036 FY2037

Diesel 40' 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67

Diesel 45' 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80

Diesel Option (Base) Buses 33,500,000 17,516,308 25,355,084 20,608,929 44,202,539

Contract Spares 1,005,000 525,489 760,653 618,268 1,326,076

5307 Funding (27,604,000) (14,433,438) (20,892,589) (16,981,758) (36,422,892)

Fuel 2,701,328 2,755,354 2,810,461 2,866,670 2,924,004 2,982,484 3,042,134 3,102,976 3,165,036 3,228,336 3,292,903 3,358,761 3,425,936 3,494,455 3,564,344 3,635,631 3,708,344 3,782,511 3,858,161 3,935,324 4,014,031

Total NPV 2017 Maintenance 4,301,640 4,387,673 4,475,426 4,564,935 4,656,233 4,749,358 4,844,345 4,941,232 5,040,057 5,140,858 5,243,675 5,348,549 5,455,520 5,564,630 5,675,923 5,789,441 5,905,230 6,023,334 6,143,801 6,266,677 6,392,011

209,643,401 156,258,835 13,903,968 7,143,027 7,285,887 7,431,605 7,580,237 7,731,842 7,886,479 8,044,208 11,813,452 8,369,194 13,759,726 8,707,310 13,126,895 9,059,085 18,345,990 9,425,072 9,613,574 9,805,845 10,001,962 10,202,001 10,406,041

Hybrid Option Diesel 40' 67 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Diesel 45' 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 57 57 25 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Hybrid 40' 0 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67

Hybrid 45' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 23 55 55 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80

Buses 48,240,000 24,253,349 35,107,039 28,535,440 63,651,656

Contract Spares 1,447,200 727,600 1,053,211 856,063 1,909,550

5307 Funding (39,749,760) (19,984,760) (28,928,200) (23,513,203) (52,448,964)

Fuel 2,701,328 2,445,330 2,494,236 2,544,121 2,595,003 2,646,903 2,699,842 2,753,838 2,808,915 2,783,896 2,839,574 2,778,832 2,834,409 2,795,564 2,851,475 2,908,505 2,966,675 3,026,009 3,086,529 3,148,259 3,211,224

Total NPV 2017 Maintenance 4,301,640 4,005,652 4,085,765 4,167,481 4,250,830 4,335,847 4,422,564 4,511,015 4,601,235 4,593,207 4,685,071 4,633,944 4,726,623 4,703,437 4,797,506 4,893,456 4,991,325 5,091,152 5,192,975 5,296,834 5,402,771

197,767,021 148,893,605 16,940,408 6,450,982 6,580,001 6,711,602 6,845,834 6,982,750 7,122,405 7,264,853 12,406,340 7,377,103 14,756,695 7,412,776 13,439,333 7,499,001 20,761,222 7,801,961 7,958,000 8,117,160 8,279,504 8,445,094 8,613,995

Annual

Cost/Savings (3,036,440) 692,045 705,886 720,004 734,404 749,092 764,074 779,355 (592,888) 992,091 (996,970) 1,294,534 (312,437) 1,560,084 (2,415,233) 1,623,111 1,655,573 1,688,685 1,722,459 1,756,908 1,792,046

Cumulative

Cost/Savings(NPV) (3,036,440) (2,364,552) (1,699,186) (1,040,281) (387,773) 258,400 898,300 1,531,987 1,063,955 1,824,311 1,082,471 1,477,248 1,798,533 2,860,874 1,264,121 2,305,934 3,337,633 4,359,315 5,371,078 6,373,017 7,365,230

Diesel 40' 67 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60

Diesel 45' 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 77 77 73 73 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72

FCEB 40' 0 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

10% ZEB Purchase Requirement FCEB 45' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 7 7 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8

Fuel Cell Option Buses 38,400,000 20,152,541 25,026,369 21,560,111 106,086,093

Contract Spares 1,152,000 604,576 750,791 646,803 3,182,583

5307 Funding (31,641,600) (16,605,694) (20,621,728) (17,765,531) (87,414,940)

Fueling Station 10,000,000 6,341,209

Building Modification 1,500,000

Utility Upgrades 1,000,000

Fuel 2,701,328 3,098,545 3,160,516 3,223,726 3,288,201 3,353,965 3,421,044 3,489,465 3,559,254 3,742,654 3,817,507 4,049,521 4,130,512 4,253,610 4,338,682 4,425,456 4,513,965 4,604,245 4,696,329 4,790,256 4,886,061

Total NPV 2017 Maintenance 4,301,640 4,538,113 4,628,875 4,721,452 4,815,881 4,912,199 5,010,443 5,110,652 5,212,865 5,366,312 5,473,638 5,651,348 5,764,375 5,897,410 6,015,359 6,135,666 6,258,379 6,383,547 6,511,218 6,641,442 6,774,271

260,023,506 195,172,949 27,413,368 7,636,657 7,789,391 7,945,178 8,104,082 8,266,164 8,431,487 8,600,117 12,923,542 9,108,966 14,446,577 9,700,869 20,677,478 10,151,021 32,207,776 10,561,122 10,772,344 10,987,791 11,207,547 11,431,698 11,660,332

Annual

Cost/Savings (13,509,400) (493,631) (503,503) (513,573) (523,845) (534,322) (545,008) (555,908) (1,110,091) (739,772) (686,852) (993,559) (7,550,583) (1,091,935) (13,861,786) (1,136,050) (1,158,771) (1,181,946) (1,205,585) (1,229,697) (1,254,291)

Cumulative

Cost/Savings(NPV) (13,509,400) (13,988,653) (14,463,253) (14,933,245) (15,398,675) (15,859,585) (16,316,021) (16,768,025) (17,644,341) (18,211,314) (18,722,396) (19,440,165) (24,735,991) (25,479,546) (34,643,820) (35,373,007) (36,095,114) (36,810,211) (37,518,365) (38,219,644) (38,914,114)

Page 6: ZERO EMISSION BUS TECHNOLOGY CHALLENGES Fall... · ZERO EMISSION BUS TECHNOLOGY CHALLENGES . Lifecycle Cost Modeling . and the problem with electric rates . Steve Miller . Chair
Page 7: ZERO EMISSION BUS TECHNOLOGY CHALLENGES Fall... · ZERO EMISSION BUS TECHNOLOGY CHALLENGES . Lifecycle Cost Modeling . and the problem with electric rates . Steve Miller . Chair

NREL Battery-Electric Evaluations

Page 8: ZERO EMISSION BUS TECHNOLOGY CHALLENGES Fall... · ZERO EMISSION BUS TECHNOLOGY CHALLENGES . Lifecycle Cost Modeling . and the problem with electric rates . Steve Miller . Chair

Electric Bus Fuel Cost?

Demand Metered time of use (TOU) rates Currently under temporary tariff programs CPUC Resolutions Future Electric Bus Charging Rates Uncertain

Page 9: ZERO EMISSION BUS TECHNOLOGY CHALLENGES Fall... · ZERO EMISSION BUS TECHNOLOGY CHALLENGES . Lifecycle Cost Modeling . and the problem with electric rates . Steve Miller . Chair

Over 43% of Bill is Demand Charges

Page 10: ZERO EMISSION BUS TECHNOLOGY CHALLENGES Fall... · ZERO EMISSION BUS TECHNOLOGY CHALLENGES . Lifecycle Cost Modeling . and the problem with electric rates . Steve Miller . Chair
Page 11: ZERO EMISSION BUS TECHNOLOGY CHALLENGES Fall... · ZERO EMISSION BUS TECHNOLOGY CHALLENGES . Lifecycle Cost Modeling . and the problem with electric rates . Steve Miller . Chair
Page 12: ZERO EMISSION BUS TECHNOLOGY CHALLENGES Fall... · ZERO EMISSION BUS TECHNOLOGY CHALLENGES . Lifecycle Cost Modeling . and the problem with electric rates . Steve Miller . Chair
Page 13: ZERO EMISSION BUS TECHNOLOGY CHALLENGES Fall... · ZERO EMISSION BUS TECHNOLOGY CHALLENGES . Lifecycle Cost Modeling . and the problem with electric rates . Steve Miller . Chair

One Bus - Fast Charge 500kW

Miles/Month 4000 kWh/mile 2.5

Demand Charge Max Peak 500 kW @ $19.04 $9,520.00 Max Part Peak 500 kW @ $4.42 $2,210.00 Max Demand 500 kW @ $14.38 $7,190.00

Total Demand Charges $18,920.00

Energy Charge Peak 3333 kWh @ $0.16233 $541.05 Part Peak 3333 kWh @ $0.10893 $363.06 Off peak 3333 kWh @ $0.07397 $246.54

Total Electricity Charges $1,150.65

Total $20,070.65 Per Mile $5.02

Assumptions: 4,000 miles/month/bus 2.5 kWh/mile 500 kW Fast Charging Charging Equally Distributed Throughout Demand Period

Page 14: ZERO EMISSION BUS TECHNOLOGY CHALLENGES Fall... · ZERO EMISSION BUS TECHNOLOGY CHALLENGES . Lifecycle Cost Modeling . and the problem with electric rates . Steve Miller . Chair

$1

$2

$3

$4

$5

1 6 12 7 13 18 19

Elec

tric

ity C

ost p

er M

ile

Number of Buses

500kWh Fast Charge Buses PG&E E19S Demand Metered TOU Service

Charging Periods Equally Distributed – Peak, Partial Peak, and Off Peak

2nd Charger 3rd Charger 4th Charger

Page 15: ZERO EMISSION BUS TECHNOLOGY CHALLENGES Fall... · ZERO EMISSION BUS TECHNOLOGY CHALLENGES . Lifecycle Cost Modeling . and the problem with electric rates . Steve Miller . Chair

100kWh Slow Charge Buses PG&E E19S Demand Metered TOU Service

Assuming One Charger for Each Bus

$1

$2

PEAK = $1.24/mile

PARTIAL PEAK = $.74/mile

OFF PEAK = $.54/mile

Page 16: ZERO EMISSION BUS TECHNOLOGY CHALLENGES Fall... · ZERO EMISSION BUS TECHNOLOGY CHALLENGES . Lifecycle Cost Modeling . and the problem with electric rates . Steve Miller . Chair

Current Deal - SCE

CPUC Resolution E-4514 SoCal Edison public agency electric bus customers Electric rate schedule TOU-GS-1 Summer Peak $.40 kWh ($1.00/mile) Winter Off Peak $.10 kWh ($.25/mile) Expires December 18, 2015

EV-6 Rate is being developed Final and interim rates/kWh Unknown

Page 17: ZERO EMISSION BUS TECHNOLOGY CHALLENGES Fall... · ZERO EMISSION BUS TECHNOLOGY CHALLENGES . Lifecycle Cost Modeling . and the problem with electric rates . Steve Miller . Chair

Current Deal – PG&E

CPUC Resolution E-4628 PG&E public agency electric bus customers Electric rate schedule A-1 Option B Summer Peak $.248 kWh ($.62/mile) Winter Off Peak $.149 kWh ($.37/mile) Three year event triggered Application period expires September 30, 2016

Final and interim rates/kWh Unknown

Page 18: ZERO EMISSION BUS TECHNOLOGY CHALLENGES Fall... · ZERO EMISSION BUS TECHNOLOGY CHALLENGES . Lifecycle Cost Modeling . and the problem with electric rates . Steve Miller . Chair

The Problem

CPUC resolutions were intended for early adoption only Investor-owned utilities need to recover costs High infrastructure costs need to be offset by low fuel costs Can demand costs be socialized?

Page 19: ZERO EMISSION BUS TECHNOLOGY CHALLENGES Fall... · ZERO EMISSION BUS TECHNOLOGY CHALLENGES . Lifecycle Cost Modeling . and the problem with electric rates . Steve Miller . Chair

Stakeholders

California Energy Commission California Public Utilities Commission California Air Resources Board Public Transit Agencies Investor-Owned Utilities People Who Breathe

Conversation needs to happen now!

Page 20: ZERO EMISSION BUS TECHNOLOGY CHALLENGES Fall... · ZERO EMISSION BUS TECHNOLOGY CHALLENGES . Lifecycle Cost Modeling . and the problem with electric rates . Steve Miller . Chair

caltransit.org/advocacy/key-issues/zero-emission-bus-regulation

Steve Miller Director of Maintenance Golden Gate Transit

[email protected]

http://www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/bus/bus.htm