zhou paper
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/3/2019 Zhou Paper
1/36
Quantitative StrategiesResearch Notes
GoldmanSachs
Strike-Adjusted Spread:
A New Metric For Estimating
The Value Of Equity Options
Joseph Zou
Emanuel Derman
July 1999
-
8/3/2019 Zhou Paper
2/36
QUANTITATIVE STRATEGIES RESEARCH NOTESSachsGoldman
-2
Copyright 1999 Goldman, Sachs & Co. All rights reserved.
This material is for your private information, and we are not soliciting any action based upon it. This report is not to be construed as
an offer to sell or th e solicitat ion of an offer t o buy an y security in any jurisdiction where such a n offer or solicitat ion would be
illegal. Certain transactions, including those involving futures, options and high yield securities, give rise to substantial risk and arenot suitable for all investors. Opinions expressed are our present opinions only. The material is based upon information that we
consider reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete, and it should not be relied upon as such. We, our affiliates,
or persons involved in the prepar ation or issuan ce of this ma terial, ma y from t ime to time h ave long or sh ort positions and buy or
sell securities, futures or options identical with or related to those ment ioned h erein.
This mat erial has been issued by Goldman, Sachs & Co. and/or one of its affiliates and has been approved by Goldman Sachs
Inter nat ional, regulated by The Securities a nd F utu res Authority, in connection with its distribution in the Un ited Kingdom a nd by
Goldman Sachs Cana da in connection with its distr ibution in Can ada. This m ater ial is distributed in Hong Kong by Goldman Sachs
(Asia) L.L.C., and in J apan by Goldman Sachs (Ja pan) Ltd. This ma terial is not for distribution to private customers, as defined by
the r ules of The Securities and F utu res Authority in the U nited Kingdom, and any investmen ts including any convertible bonds or
derivatives mentioned in this material will not be made available by us to any such private customer. Neither Goldman, Sachs & Co.
nor i ts representative in Seoul, Korea is l icensed to engage in securit ies business in the Republic of Korea. Goldman Sachs
Inter nat ional or its affiliates may h ave acted upon or used this r esearch pr ior t o or imm ediately following its publication. Foreign
currency denominated securities are subject to fluctuat ions in exchange ra tes th at could have an a dverse effect on the value or pr ice
of or income derived from th e investment. F urt her information on any of the securities mentioned in this m ater ial may be obtained
upon request and for t his pur pose persons in Ita ly should contact Goldma n Sa chs S.I.M. S.p.A. in Milan, or at its London branch
office at 133 Fleet Street, and persons in Hong Kong should contact Goldman Sachs Asia L.L.C. at 3 Garden Road. Unless governing
law permits otherwise, you must contact a Goldman Sachs entity in your home jurisdiction if you want to use our services in
effecting a tran saction in the securities mentioned in this ma terial.
Note: Opt ions are not suitable for al l investors . Please e nsure that you h ave read an d understood the c urrent opt ions
disclosure docum ent before entering into any opt ions transact ion s .
-
8/3/2019 Zhou Paper
3/36
-1
QUANTITATIVE STRATEGIES RESEARCH NOTESSachsGoldman
SUMMARY
Investors in equity options experience two problems tha t compoundeach other. In contrast to fixed-income and currency markets, there
are thousands of underlyers and tens of thousands of options, and
each underlyer can have a potentially large volatility skew. How can
an options investor gau ge which option provides the best r elative
value?
In t his pap er, we mak e use of a m eth od for estima ting th e fair volat ility
smile of any equity underlyer from information embedded in the time
series of tha t under lyers h istorical r etur ns. We can then comput e th e
relative richness or cheapn ess of an y par ticular strike a nd expiration
by exam ining t he options S trike-Adjusted S pread, or SAS , the differ-
ence between its market implied volatility and its estimated histori-cally-fair volatility.
We obta in fair volat ility smiles by estima ting th e appr opriate r isk-neu-
tral distribution for valuing options on any equity underlyer from that
under lyers historical retu rn s. The distribution includes t he effect of
both past price jumps and past shifts in realized volatility. Using this
distribution, we can estimate the fair volatility skews for illiquid or
thinly-tra ded single-stock an d basket options. We can also forecast
cha nges in t he sk ew from chan ges in a sin gle options price.
___________________
J oseph Zou (212) 902-9794
Eman uel Derman (212) 902-0129
Editorial: Barbar a Dun n
-
8/3/2019 Zhou Paper
4/36
QUANTITATIVE STRATEGIES RESEARCH NOTESSachsGoldman
0
Table of Contents
THE RICHNESS AND CHEAPNESS OF OPTIONS..............................................1
Cur rent vs. Pas t Im plied Volat ilities .............................................. 1
Implied vs. Historical Volatilities ...................................................1
Strike-Adjusted Spread (SAS) ........................................................ 1
ATM Strike-Adjusted Spread ..........................................................3
OPTIONS PRICES AND IMPLIED DISTRIBUTIONS ............................................5
STOCK RETURNS AND H ISTORICAL DISTRIBUTIONS ......................................6
MAXIMAL UNCERTAINTY AND MARKET EQUILIBRIUM ..................................8
Entropy as a Measure of Uncertainty ............................................8
The Risk-Neu tr alized Histor ical Distr ibut ion ............................... 9
APPLICATIONS OF THE RIS K-NEUTRALIZED DISTRIBUTION ....................... 11
Is Th e In dex Im plied Volat ility Skew F air ? .................................11
Str ike-Adjust ed Spr ead As A Measur e Of Options Valu e ...........13
Valuin g Opt ions on Ba sket s of Stocks ..........................................15
Forecast ing The Sha pe of The Skew
Fr om A Cha nge In A Single Opt ion P rice ............................... 17
End-of-Day Mark To Market .........................................................19
Filling Gap s I n Invest ors Mar ket Views ......................................19
CONCLUDING REMARKS .............................................................................. 20
APPENDIX A: INFORMATION AND ENTROPY ................................................21
APPENDIX B: DETERMINING THE RIS K-NEUTRAL
DISTRIBUTION FROM H ISTORICAL RETURNS ..........................24
APPENDIX C: A DERIVATIVE ASSET ALLOCATION MODEL
AND THE EQUILIBRIUM RIS K-NEUTRAL DENSITY ..................25
REFERENCES ................................................................................................29
-
8/3/2019 Zhou Paper
5/36
1
QUANTITATIVE STRATEGIES RESEARCH NOTESSachsGoldman
THE RICHNESS AND
CHEAPNESS OF
OPTIONS
The equities world is a ma ss of dat a. Sur rounded by fluctua ting shar e
prices, dividend yields, ear nings forecasts, P /E ra tios, an d hosts of
more sophisticat ed mea sures, a nalysts, investors a re in n eed of some
gauge or metric with which to compare the relative attractiveness ofdifferent stocks. Int o the breach, in newslett ers, books an d websites,
step countless economists, technical analysts, fundamental analysts,
cha rtists, wave t heorists, alpha -maximizers and other optimists, hop-
ing to impose order a nd r at iona lity, to tell you wh at to buy an d sell.
Investors in equity options face an equally difficult task, with less
resour ces. For each un derlying st ock, basket or index, ma ny sta ndar d
str ikes and expira tions are ava ilable. For a given under lyer, each str ike
and expirat ion tra des at i ts own implied volati li ty, all of which,
together, comprise an implied volatility surface [Derman, Kani and
Zou, (1996)] that moves continually. Each underlyer has its own idio-
syncrat ic sur face. In a ddition, un derlyers can be grouped to creat e bas-kets, new underlyers with their own (never before observed) volatility
surface.
For a given stock or index, how is an investor to know which strike and
expiration provides the best value? What metric can options investors
use to gauge their estimated excess return ? What is the appropriate
volatility sur face for a n illiquid basket ? Help is spar se.
Current vs. Past
Implied Volatilities
The most comm on gauge of options valu e ha s been th e sprea d between
curr ent an d pa st im plied volat ilities. This is the met ric of options spec-
ulators, who hope to get in at historically low volatilities, hedge for a
while, an d get out h igh. When all options of a given expirat ion t ra de at
the same implied volatility, it is not too hard to compare changes in
implied volatility over time. Since the advent of the volatility smile,
however, it ha s become har der to ha ve a clear opinion of the relative
richn ess of two complex volat ility sur faces.
Implied vs. Historical
Volatilities
A second gauge is the spread between current implied and past real-
ized volatilities. This is the metric of options replicators, who hope to
lock in th e differen ce between futu re r ealized and curr ent implied vola-
tilities by delta-hedging their options to expiration. This comparison,
becomes imprecise in t he pr esence of a volatility skew, when t her e ar e
a range of implied volatilities, varying by strike, that must be com-
par ed with only a single hist orical r ealized volatility.
-
8/3/2019 Zhou Paper
6/36
QUANTITATIVE STRATEGIES RESEARCH NOTESSachsGoldman
2
Strike-Adjusted
Spread
(SAS)
The h istorical time ser ies of a stocks r etur ns conta ins m uch u seful
inform at ion. In th is paper we tr y to come to the pr actical aid of options
investors by estimating the fair value of options from the historical
retu rn s of their u nderlyers. This met hod for options pricing ha s beenextensively developed by St utzer (1996), a nd also employed by Der-
man , Kama l, Kani & Zou (1997), an d St utzer an d Chowdhury (1999).
Here we apply it in th e pra ctical si tuations that occur on an equity
derivat ives tr ading desk, where options on man y different under lyers
mu st be va lued da ily.
This met hod leads us t o th e notion ofS trike-Adjusted S pread, or S AS , a
nat ur al one-dimensiona l metric with which t o rank the relative value
of all standard equity options, irrespective of their particular strike or
expirat ion. We propose t o use S AS in roughly the sa me way tha t st ock
investors use alph a an d mortga ge investors use OA S (option-adjusted
spread). To be specific, the S AS of an option is the spread between thecurr ent ma rk et implied volatility of tha t option an d our m odels esti-
mate of its historically appropriate volatility. Our estimate includes
both th e effect of past pr ice jumps a nd t he influ ences of cha nges in vol-
at ility an d corr elations for ba sket options.
Theoretically, the historically appropriate implied volatility for a given
option is determined by the cost of replicating that option throughout
its lifetime. Not only is th is replication cost difficult an d t ime-consu m-
ing to simulate, but, in our experience, the hedging errors due to inac-
cura te volatility forecast ing and infrequent h edging ma ke the resu lting
sta tistics inconclusive. Instea d, our met hod for obtainin g the ap propri-
ate implied volatility of a stock option involves the estimation of anappropriate risk-neutral distribution from the past realized return dis-
tribution of the stock. We will explain the method in more detail below,
an d describe its application to SAS . The same technique can be used to
mark and hedge i ll iquid equi ty opt ions whose market prices are
unknown.
The strike-adjusted spread of an option depends on both its strike K
and t ime to expirat ion T, and can be wr it t en more precisely as
. S AS can be th ought of as a n extension of the commonly
quoted implied-to-historical volatility spread, which is unique only in
th e a bsence of skew. In non-skewed worlds, both sprea ds become iden -
tical.
In br ief, the S AS of a st ock option is ca lcula ted a s follows.
1. First, choosing some historically relevant period, we obtain the dis-
tribution of stock retu rns over time T. This empirical ret urn distri-
but ion char acter izes th e past behavior of th e stock.
S A S K T ,( )
-
8/3/2019 Zhou Paper
7/36
3
QUANTITATIVE STRATEGIES RESEARCH NOTESSachsGoldman
2. Option theory dictates that options are valued as the discounted
expected value of the option payoff over the risk-neutral distribu-
tion. We do not know the appropriate risk-neutra l distribution.
However, we use the empirical return distribution as a statisticalprior to provide us with an estimate of the r isk-neut ra l distribution
by minimizing the entr opy1 associated with the difference between
th e distr ibutions, subject to ensur ing that th e risk-neut ra l distribu-
tion is consistent with the current forward price of the stock. We call
this risk-neutral distribution 2 obtained in th is way the risk-neu-
tral ized historical distribution , or RNHD.
3. We then use the RNHD to calculate the expected values of standard
options of all strikes for expiration T, and convert t hese values to
Black-Scholes implied volatilities. We denote the Black-Scholes
implied volat ility of an option whose price is compu ted from t his dis-tr ibution as . This is our estimated fair option volatility.
4. For an option with strike Kan d expiration T, whose market implied
vola t ilit y is , t h e s tr ike-ad ju st ed s pread in vola t ilit y is
defined as
This spread is a measu re of the curr ent r ichness 3 of th e option
based on historical r etur ns.
ATM Strike-Adjusted
Spread
The volat ility skew, the relat ive gap bet ween a t-th e-money an d out-of-
the-money implied volatilities for a given expiration, is more stable
tha n the absolute level of at -the-money implied volatilities. Often,
therefore, irrespective of historical return distributions, the current
level of at -the-money implied volat ility is t he most believable estima te
of fut ur e volatility. It is likely tha t h istorical distr ibutions tell us m ore
about the higher moments of future distributions than it does about
their stan dar d deviation.
Therefore, we will often use a modified version ofS AS for which the
risk-neutralized historical distribution is further constrained to repro-
1. As we explain later, mark ets in equilibrium a re chara cterized by maxi-mum un certa inty or minima l informa tion, an d minimal entr opy cha nge
is an expression of minimal informa tion.
2. Stu tzer (1996) refers to this as t he canonical distribut ion. an d th is
method of options valuation as canonical valuation.
3. A positive S AS connotes richness only for standard options whose value
is a monotonically increasing function of volatility. Exotic options may
have values th at decrease a s volatility increases.
H
K T,( )
S A S K T ,( ) K T,( ) H K T,( )=
-
8/3/2019 Zhou Paper
8/36
QUANTITATIVE STRATEGIES RESEARCH NOTESSachsGoldman
4
duce the current market value of at-the-money options. We call this
(additionally constrained) distribution the at-the-money adjusted,
r i sk-neutra l ized hi s torica l d i s tribut ion, or RNHDATM. Th e
strike-adjusted spread computed using this distribution, denoted, is a mea sur e of the r elative value of different str ikes,
assum ing t hat , by definition, at-the-money-forward implied volatility
is fair.
We pr opose u sin g t o r an k opt ion s on t he sa me u nder -
lyer, in order t o deter mine wh ich st rikes pr ovide the best value by his-
torical standards. More radically, we can also use the same measure to
compa re options of different un derlyers.
In the rema inder of th is paper, we flesh out these concepts. The n ext
section explains t he r elation between options pr ices an d implied distr i-butions. Thereafter, we compar e implied distributions to h istorical
return distributions. We then explain that markets in equilibrium are
characterized by maximal investor uncertainty, and, introducing the
notion of ent ropy, show th at we can obta in an estima te of th e risk-neu-
tral distribution from the historical distribution by minimizing the
entropy difference between the distributions. The main body of the
paper th en develops several applications of th e risk-neut ra lized histor-
ical distribution, including SAS . After some concluding rema rks, we
provide several mathematical appendices.
S A S ATM K T,( )
S A S ATM K T,( )
-
8/3/2019 Zhou Paper
9/36
5
QUANTITATIVE STRATEGIES RESEARCH NOTESSachsGoldman
OPTIONS PRICES AND
IMPLIED DISTRIBUTIONS
According t o th e t heory of options va luat ion, stock options prices con-
ta in informa tion about t he m ar ket s collective expecta tion of th e stocks
futur e volat ility an d its retu rn dist ribut ion. If no riskless ar bitra ge can
occur, th ere exists a risk-neut ra l retur n probability distr ibution Q suchthat the value V of an option on a stock with price S at t ime t is given
by the discount ed expected valu e of th e opt ions payoff, writt en a s
(EQ 1)
where r is the risk-free interest rate and EQ[ | ] denotes the expected
value of th e fut ur e payoff at t ime T, given that the stock price at time t
is S .
In t he Black-Scholes theory, the r isk-neutr al implied probability distr i-
bution Q is the lognorm al den sity funct ion with a specified volat ility. In
implied tree m odels4, Q is skewed relative to the Black-Scholes density,
and can be estimated at any time from a set of traded European option
prices. Figure 1a illustrates an implied volatility skew for S&P 500
index options, typically about five volatility points for a 10% change in
strike level; Figure 1b shows the correspondingly skewed risk-neutral
implied distribut ion Q. When ever the sh ape of th e skew cha nges, there
is a corresponding change in the distribution. Knowing Q, you can cal-
culate t he fair value of any stan dard Eu ropean option.
4. See for exam ple, Derm an , Kani, and Zou (1996).
V S t,( ) e r T t( ) EQ Option Pa yoff at T | S t,[ ]=
FIGURE 1. (a) The three-month implied volatility skew for S&P 500 indexoptions on 3/10/99. (b) Q, the corresponding risk-neutral impliedprobability distribution of returns. We assume a riskless interest rate of 5%.
Strike Level
ImpliedVolatility(%)
1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500
20
25
30
35
Index Return (%)
Probability(%)
-40 -20 0 20
0
2
4
6
(a) (b)
-
8/3/2019 Zhou Paper
10/36
QUANTITATIVE STRATEGIES RESEARCH NOTESSachsGoldman
6
STOCK RETURNS AND
HISTORICAL
DISTRIBUTIONS
Stock options prices determine the implied distribution of stock
retu rn s. Independently, we can also observe the actual distribution of
stock. Consider th e hist orical ser ies S i of daily closing pr ices of a st ock
or stock index. We can construct the rolling series of continuously com-pounded st ock ret ur ns R i from da y i for a subsequent period of N trad-
ing days by calculatin g
(EQ 2)
Figure 2 shows th e distr ibution of actu al thr ee-month S&P 500 retu rn s
for periods both before a nd since th e 1987 stock mar ket cra sh, where
the latter period includ es the crash itself.
The pre-crash return distribution is approximately symmetric and nor-mally distributed. In contrast, the post-crash distribution (1987-crash
data included) has a higher mean return and a lower standard devia-
tion, as well as a n a symmetric secondar y peak a t its lower end.
There is a rough similar ity in sha pe between th e implied distribution
of Figur e 1b, whose mean reflects th e risk-free r at e at which its options
were priced, and the historical distribution ofFigure 2b, whose (differ-
ent) mean is the a verage historical ret urn over th e post-cra sh per iod.
R i
S i N+
S i---------------log=
Index Return (%)
Probability(%)
-20 0 20
0
1
2
3
4
Index Return (%)
Probability(%)
-20 0 20
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
mean =1.8%std. div. = 7.3%
mean = 3.3%std. div. = 7.8%
FIGURE 2. Three-month, S&P 500 index, observed return distributions.(a) Pre-1987 crash (Jan. 1970 to Jan. 1987); (b) Post-1987 crash (June 1987to June 1999)
(a) (b)
-
8/3/2019 Zhou Paper
11/36
7
QUANTITATIVE STRATEGIES RESEARCH NOTESSachsGoldman
Options theory does not enforce an unambiguous link between histori-
cal and implied distributions. Nevertheless, historical distributions,
suitably interpreted, can provide plausible informat ion about fair
options prices. Our aim in th is paper is to develop a h eur istic but logi-cal link between the two distributions, utilizing the notions of market
equilibrium an d u ncertaint y.
-
8/3/2019 Zhou Paper
12/36
QUANTITATIVE STRATEGIES RESEARCH NOTESSachsGoldman
8
MAXIMAL
UNCERTAINTY AND
MARKET EQUILIBRIUM
Markets are supposed to settle into equilibrium when supply equals
demand, when there are equal numbers of buyers and sellers at some
price. In a n efficient ma rk et, the potent ial buyers of a st ock mu st th ink
the stock is cheap, and potential sellers must think it rich. This differ-ence of opinion m ean s th at , in equilibrium , th e distr ibution of expected
retu rn s displays great un certa inty.
How do we quantify this simple intuition that equilibrium involves
uncerta inty in the expected retu rn distribution?
Entropy as a Measure
of Uncertainty
The probability of a single event is a m easur e of the un certa inty of its
occurrence. Entropy is a mathematical funct ion that measures th e
uncer ta in ty of a probabil it y d i st ribu t ion5. The entropy of a random
variable R , whose ith occurrence in the distribution has probability p i,
is defined t o be
(EQ 3)
Since any pr obabilityp i is less th an or equa l to 1, the ent ropy is always
positive. If the distribution R collapses to one certain single event j,
whose pr oba bility with a ll oth er , th en H(R) = 0. There-
fore, certainty corresponds to the lowest possible entropy. You can also
show that the en tropy takes it s maximum value, log(n), when
for all i, that is, when all outcomes have an equal chanceand uncertainty reigns. This is consistent with the notion that maxi-
mum entropy corresponds to maximum uncertainty and minimum
information.
H(R ) is t he entr opy of a single distr ibution R . We can also define t he
relative entropy S (P,Q) between an initial distr ibution P and a subse-
quent distribution Q. S measures the decrease in entropy (or the
increase in inform at ion) between the initia l distr ibution P and the final
distribution Q, an d is given by
(EQ 4)
In Appendix A we show th at the relative entr opy is always non-nega-
tive, and is zero if an d only if the t wo distr ibutions P and Q ar e identi-
5. In Appendix A we explain th e link between en tr opy an d informat ion.
H R( ) p i p ilogi 1=
n
=
pj 1= p i 0=
p i 1 n=
S P Q,( ) EQ Q Ploglog[ ] Q x( )Q x( )P x( )------------- log
x= =
-
8/3/2019 Zhou Paper
13/36
9
QUANTITATIVE STRATEGIES RESEARCH NOTESSachsGoldman
cal. This agrees with our intuit ion tha t any chan ge in a probability
distribution conveys some new informat ion. The relative entropy
between two distr ibutions measu res th e inform at ion gain (or redu ction
in uncertainty) after a distribution change. Thus, minimum relativeent ropy corresponds to the least increase in inform at ion.
The Risk-Neutralized
Historical Distribution
Consider a stock option with time to expiration T on a st ock whose spot
price is . To value th e option, we need to average the option payoff
over t h e r is k-n eu t ra l p roba bilit y d en sit y . I n t h eor y, Q( )
is foun d by solving th e differen tial equa tion tha t const ra ins th e inst an -
tan eously hedged option t o ear n t he insta nta neously riskless retu rn. In
the Black-Scholes world, a stocks futu re probability distribution is
assu med to be lognorma l, an d consequ ent ly, th ough not obviously, Q( )
itself is a lognormally distributed probability density, and its options
prices have no volatility skew.
This theoretical lack of skew conflicts with the data from markets,
where stocks and indexes tha t have sufficiently l iquid out-of-the-
money strikes display clear, and often large, skews. How can we esti-
mate a suitable risk-neutral probability density that is more consistent
with market skews than the Black-Scholes lognormal distribution?
It is n atur al to tu rn for insight t o the distribution of actual return s,
. The two distributions Q( ) and P( ) can not be str ictly
identical, because the expected value of the stock price under the risk-
neutral distribution Q( ) at a ny time m ust be the stocks curren t for-
ward pr ice, as determined by t he curr ent risk-free r ate, whereas theexpected value of the stock price under P( ) is the aver age h istorical for-
ward price, which bears no relation to current risk-free rates.
The r igorous wa y to obta in Q( ) from the past evolution of stock prices
is to obta in fair historical options pr ices for a var iety of str ikes by sim-
ulating the instantaneously riskless hedging strategy over the life of
these options, and to then infer the risk-neutral density that matches
these prices. This r equires a detailed knowledge of every past instan t
of the st ock pr ice evolution, at a ll times an d ma rk et levels, and is time-
consu ming, difficult, er ror-prone a nd u ltima tely impra ctical.
Instead, we will estimate the current risk-neutral return distributionQ( ) for a s tock from it s hist orical distr ibut ion P( ) by assuming th at the
latter is a plausible estimate for the former, and then requiring that
the r elative entr opy S (P,Q) between th e distr ibutions is minimized. We
impose this criterion in order to avoid any spurious increase in appar-
ent informa tion in creat ing the r isk-neut ra l distribution from th e his-
torical distribution. We perform the minimizat ion subject to th e r isk-
S 0
Q S 0 0 S T T,;,( )
P S 0 0 S T T,;,( )
-
8/3/2019 Zhou Paper
14/36
QUANTITATIVE STRATEGIES RESEARCH NOTESSachsGoldman
10
neut ra lity constr aint, t ha t is, the condition t ha t t he expected value of
the stock price under the risk-neutral distribution Q( ) is consistent
with t he st ocks curr ent forwa rd pr ice6. We call Q( ) found in this way
the risk-neu tral ized historical distribution 7, or the RNHD. It is
our plausible guess for the distribution to use in options valuation,
given our knowledge of the past . Our kn owledge of a stocks h istorical
volatility, the second moment of its distribution, is often used to esti-
mate options values using the Black-Scholes formula. Here we go one
step further by using t he ent ire historical return dis t r ibut ion. A
description of the general approach outlined here can also be found in
Stu tzer (1996).
It is possible to impose further constraints on Q( ). If you believe that
the current at-the-money volatility for some particular stock is fair, you
can constrain the distribution Q( ) to ma tch n ot only th e st ock forward
price, but also to mat ch th e curr ent at -the-money implied volatility. We
denote this additiona lly constr ained distribution by Qat m ( ), and refer
to it as the at-the-money-consistent , r isk-neu tral ized historical
distribution , or RNHDATM. It can be used to compare the relative
values of options with different strikes on one underlyer, assuming
th at at -the-money volatility is fair.
Appendix B sta tes t he m inimization condition on Q( ) in mat hema tical
ter ms. In Appendix C we presen t a model of an Arr ow-Debreu economy
and show that it is possible to obtain the risk-neutralized historical
distr ibution by optimally allocating investors wealth u nder a n equilib-
rium condition with a n exponentia l utility fun ction.
Having obtained our estimate of the r isk-neut ra l distribution, we can
est imate the fai r price for any s tandard opt ion as the discounted
expected value of its payoff at expiration. We then extract the fair
implied volatility as the volatility which equates the Black-Scholes
option price to th e estima ted fair pr ice. This pr ocedur e can be repea ted
for all strikes and mat urities t o yield an entire fair implied volatility
surface.
6. Several aut hors have stu died the relevance of entr opy in finan cial eco-
nomics and derivatives pricing. See Stu tzer (1996), Derma n et al .
(1997), Buchen an d Kelly (1996), an d Gu lko (1996).7. For a norma l historical distribut ion of simply compoun ded retu rn s, one
can show that the risk-neutralized historical distribution obtained by
entr opy minimization is equivalent to a t ran slation of the historical dis-
tribution to re-center i t at the appropriate risk-neutral rate, without
altering its shape. This t ranslation invariance of the sha pe in moving
from th e historical to th e risk-neutr al distribut ion does not hold in gen-
eral.
-
8/3/2019 Zhou Paper
15/36
11
QUANTITATIVE STRATEGIES RESEARCH NOTESSachsGoldman
APPLICATIONS OF
THE RISK-NEUTRALIZED
HISTORICAL
DISTRIBUTION
The RNHD contains informat ion which can be used to estimate the
value of illiquid options whose prices a re unobtainable, as well a s to
compare the relative value of options with known market prices. We
present several representative examples below.
Is The Index Implied
Volatility Skew Fair?
Since the 1987 crash, equity index markets have displayed a pro-
nounced, persistent implied volatility skew. Is this skew fair? Are the
options prices determ ined by th e skew justified by historical r etur ns?
Figure 3a sh ows the r isk-neut ra lized three-month S&P 500 return dis-
tr ibution for the pre-cra sh period corr esponding t o Figure 2a, con-
structed using our method of relative entropy minimization. Figure 3b
shows the sa me distr ibution corresponding to the post-cra sh er a ofFig-
ure 2b. The post-crash distribution has a substantially longer tail at
low retur ns th an t he pre-cra sh distribution.
Skew slopes seem m ore sta ble th an volat ility levels. Therefore, we willfocus here on the relation between the implied volatilities of different
strikes that follows from these distributions, and pay little attention to
th e pr evailing a bsolute level of implied volatility. We est imat e t he fair
volati l i ty skew by using the distributions of Figure 3 to calculate
options prices, and by th en converting these options prices t o Black-
Scholes implied volatilities.
The results are shown in Figure 4. The pre-crash skew is approxi-
ma tely flat, but th e post-cra sh volat ilities increase for low str ikes, with
a slope similar to actual index skews in stable ma rkets. The observed
degree of skew, a bout five to six volatility points per 10% chan ge in
Index Return (%)
Probability(%)
-20 0 20
0
1
2
3
4
Index Return (%)
Probability(%)
-40 -20 0 20
0
2
4
6
FIGURE 3. The three- month risk-neutral distribution of S&P 500 returnsconstructed from the empirica l distributionsof Figure 2 using a 6% risklessrate. (a) Pre-crash (b) Post-crash.
(a ) (b)
-
8/3/2019 Zhou Paper
16/36
QUANTITATIVE STRATEGIES RESEARCH NOTESSachsGoldman
12
str ike level, seems a pproximately fair in t he light of post-crash ma rk et
behavior. Our fair post-crash skew is bilinear and more convex than
the recent skew ofFigure 1a, but index mark ets do sometimes display
skews like th at ofFigure 4.
We find that estimated one-month skews tend to resemble a smile
more than a skew: our fair implied volatilities of both out-of-the-money
calls a nd p ut s for one-month expirat ions exceed a t-th e-money volatili-
ties. Short -dated index options often d isplay th is type of behavior. We
have applied our method to several other major stock indexes and
found that their fair volati li ty skews a re roughly consistent withobserved market skews during normal market periods, as shown in
Table 1.
FIGURE4. The fair implied volatility skew for three-month S&P 500 options ascalculated from the risk-neutralized historical distributions of Figure 3.
Strike Level
Volatility(%)
90 95 100 105 110
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
post-crashpre-crash
TABLE 1. Comparison of actual skews with estimated fair volatility skews forthree major indexes. The spread shown is the difference in volatility pointsbetween a 25-delta put and a 25-delta ca ll.
IndexNormala
Spread
a. Average during normal market conditions (excluding the periods of
extreme volatility in late October 1997 and August-September 1998).
Extreme b
Spread
b. Average during periods of extreme market volatility.
Fairc
Spread
c. Based on historical returns over the period June 1987 to June 1999.
SPX 4-7% 14% 6.0%
DAX 3-6% 10% 3.5%
FTSE 2-6%. 10% 4.0%
-
8/3/2019 Zhou Paper
17/36
13
QUANTITATIVE STRATEGIES RESEARCH NOTESSachsGoldman
Strike-Adjusted
Sprea d As A Measure
Of Options Value
The Strike-Adjusted Spread for an option with strike Kan d expiration
T is defined as
where is the Black-Scholes market implied vola t ility of the
op tion , a n d is t h e im plied vola t ilit y com pu t ed fr om t h e
RNHD over some chosen r elevan t per iod. S ASATMis constrained to be
consist ent with t he m ar kets at -the-money-forward im plied volat ility
for t ha t pa rt icu la r u nder lyer a nd expir at ion , so t ha t
, wh er e is t he for wa rd va lu e of t he
underlyer at time T. This spread is a measur e of the curr ent r ichness,
relative to history, of an option, assum ing t hat at-the-money-forward
options, usua lly th e most liquid, are fairly valued.
Figure 5a shows a plot of fair and market skews for Sept. 1999 S&P
500 options, on May 18, 1999, using the twelve years of historical
r et u rn s from May 1987 t o May 1999 t o ca lcu la t e . Figure 5b
shows the S ASATMfor the same options. For out-of-the-money puts, the
entr opy-adjusted volatilities slightly exceed the mar ket volatilities,
which suggests that out-of-the-money puts are slightly cheap. Con-
verse ly, out -of-th e-money calls seem rich.
Figure 6 shows the sam e plots based on a h istorical ret ur n distr ibution
tak en from May 1988 thr ough May 1999, th ereby excluding the 1987
global stock market crash. In this case, out-of-the-money puts seemmuch too rich, while out-of-the-money calls are slightly cheap.
In our view, SAS is a qua nt itat ive tool for r an king th e relat ive value of
options, but t his does not a bsolve the u ser from choosing th e hist orical
period relevant to the computation of the risk-neutralized distribution.
There is no escaping the judgement necessary to decide which past
period is most relevant t o the curr ent m ar ket from both a fundam enta l
and psychological point of view.
In Figure 7, we plot th e skews an d SASATM for t he sa me set of options
used in Figure 5 and 6, but evaluated one month later. Although at-
the-money volatility has now fallen from 25.5% to 21%, the size ofskews has remained relatively stable. Roughly irrespective of which
historical distribution was used, th e strike-adjusted spreads have
changed so that out-of-the-money puts have become about two SAS
point s cheaper, wher eas th e SAS of out -of-th e-money calls ha s chan ged
less. If you had thought the relevant historical distribution was the
crash-inclusive one ofFigure 5, and had bought cheap puts, you would
S A S ATM K T,( ) K T,( ) H K T,( )=
K T,( )H K T,( )
S A S ATM S F T[ ] T,( ) 0= S F T[ ]
H K T,( )
-
8/3/2019 Zhou Paper
18/36
QUANTITATIVE STRATEGIES RESEARCH NOTESSachsGoldman
14
Strike Level
Volatility(%)
1200 1250 1300 1350 1400 1450
22
24
26
28
30
32
"fair skew"market skew
Strike Level
SAS(%)
1200 1250 1300 1350 1400 1450
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
FIGURE 5. (a) Fair and market skews for S&P 500 index options on May 18,1999. (b) SASATM for the same options.The options considered expire on September 17, 1999. Both fair andmarket implied volatilities are constrained to match at the money,forward. The RNHD is constructed using returns from May 1987 to May
1999, including the 1987 crash.
(a ) (b )
Strike Level
Volatility(%)
1200 1250 1300 1350 1400 1450
24
26
28
30
"fair skew"market skew
Strike Level
SAS(%)
1200 1250 1300 1350 1400 1450
0
2
4
6
FIGURE 6. (a) Fair and market skews for S&P 500 index options on May 18,1999. (b) SASATM for the same options.The optionsconsidered expire on September 17, 1999. Both fair and marketimplied volatilities are constrained to match at the money, forward. The
RNHD is constructed using returns from May 1988 to May 1999, therebyexcluding the 1987 crash.
(a ) (b)
-
8/3/2019 Zhou Paper
19/36
15
QUANTITATIVE STRATEGIES RESEARCH NOTESSachsGoldman
have lost SAS . If, on th e other ha nd, you ha d thought th at t he relevan t
distr ibution was t he cra sh-exclusive one ofFigure 6, an d sold rich pu ts,
you would h ave gained several points ofS AS
.
Valuing Options on
Baskets of Stocks
The valu e of an OTC option on a custom bask et of stocks is difficult to
estima te, since there is n o liquid options m ar ket from which to extr act
pricing inform at ion. Consider an investor inter ested in bu ying a collar
on a basket of bank stocks he owns. Suppose he wants to buy a 10%
out-of-th e-money pu t an d fin an ce it by selling a 10% out -of-th e-money
call on the basket. What volatility spread or skew should one use to
price th e collar?
One of the problems in valuing basket options is that correlations
am ong component stocks var y widely with t he st ock levels. When t her e
is a sharp downward market move, the correlations tend to increase.
Consequ ent ly, a ba sket ma y exhibit la rge volat ility skews even if each
component stock shows little skewness in its distribution. Thus OTM
puts on a basket should, in general, trade a t a premium because th e
Strike Level
Volatility(%)
1200 1250 1300 1350 1400 1450
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
"fair skew"market skew
Strike Level
SAS(%)
1200 1250 1300 1350 1400 1450
-2
-1
0
1
Strike Level
Volatility(%)
1200 1250 1300 1350 1400 1450
20
22
24
26
28
"fair skew"market skew
Strike Level
SAS(%)
1200 1250 1300 1350 1400 1450
0
1
2
3
4
5
FIGURE 7. Re-evaluated SASATM on June 21, 1999 for September 17, 1999S&P 500 options. The top two figures correspond to the crash-inclusivedistributions of Figure 5; the bottom two correspond to the crash-exclusivedistributions of Figure 6.
-
8/3/2019 Zhou Paper
20/36
QUANTITATIVE STRATEGIES RESEARCH NOTESSachsGoldman
16
increasing corr elations in a down ma rket mak es the basket retu rn dis-
tr ibut ion sk ewed to the lower en d. How do we model this effect? We ut i-
l ize th e informa tion embedded in the historical t ime series of th e
basket.
To be specific, we consider an example in which th e bas ket consists of
an equal number of shares of five bank stocks: J.P. Morgan, Wells
Fargo, Bank One, Bank America, a nd Ch ase. We first retr ieve th e his-
torical data for all five stocks and aggregate th em to form the t ime
series of bask et ret ur ns an d their hist orical distr ibution. We use histor-
ical data from June 1987 to June 1999 in this example. By minimizing
th e relat ive ent ropy, we convert th e historical distr ibution into an est i-
mate of the risk neutral distribution. Figure 8 displays the estimated
three-month implied volatility skew for the bank basket calculated
from the risk-neutral distribution. The volatility spread between the
10% OTM call an d th e 10% OTM put is appr oximat ely seven volat ilitypoint s. In th e absen ce of any ma rk et inform at ion on t he pr ice of options
on this bask et with a variety of strikes, this seems a useful method of
obtaining some sense of the appropriate skew. We note that in using
this approach, we managed to bypass the problem of predicting future
correlations between the component stocks in the basket, a major hur-
dle in valuing basket options. In this particular example, t he three-
month correlations between the stocks in the basket almost doubled
during the Fall of 1998 following the Russian currency devaluation.
Our a pproach ta kes into account t he chan ges in corr elations embedded
in the basket time series.
We ha ve also applied our model to options on t he BKX index (a bask etof 24 large U.S. banks with opt ions l is ted on the Phi ladelphia
exchange). We constructed a basket with the same weighting as the
BKX index and calculat ed both its emp irical retu rn dist ribut ion an d its
estimated risk-neut ra l distribution. The r esulting thr ee-month volatil-
ity skew is close to the skew observed in the listed options market,
even when the at-the-money volatility levels differ. This further dem-
onstr at es the reasonableness of our approach.
-
8/3/2019 Zhou Paper
21/36
17
QUANTITATIVE STRATEGIES RESEARCH NOTESSachsGoldman
Forecasting The
Shape of The Skew
From A Change In A
Single Option Price
Market makers in index options keep a steady eye on the skew. Sup-
pose th at for a given expira tion ther e are n options, with st rikes Ki and
known implied volatil it ies , that chara cterize the skew. Suppose
th at imp lied volatilities and th e skew have been rela tively sta ble; th en,
one of the options implied volat ilities su ddenly chan ges in r esponse to
new mar ket sentiments or pressures. How should th e mar ket m akeradjust t he quotes for a ll oth er options given t he su dden change in th e
price of one? This question is par ticularly relevan t for a ut oma ted elec-
tronic market-making systems. The maximum entropy method pro-
vides a possible answer.
We start with the implied distribution 8 computed from the known
implied volatil it ies . Now suppose the implied volati li ty of one
op tion wit h st r ik e level h a s ch a nged t o a n ew va lu e . We
would like to regard this one move in implied volatility as the visible
tip of th e iceberg, the observable segment of a new s kew th at will soon
manifest. To identify this new skew, we seek to find the new risk-neu-
t ra l dist ribu tion t ha t is con sist en t wit h t he sin gle n ew
and known implied volatility, while minimizing the entropy change
FIGURE 8. The estimated fair three- month implied volatility skew for thebasket of five bank stocks listed in the text, estimated from the risk-neutralized historical distribution using returns from June 1987 to June1999.
Strike Level
Volatility(%)
80 90 100 110 120
20
2
2
24
26
28
30
32
8. See Derma n, Kan i, an d Zou (1996).
i Ki( )
i Ki( )
Kj Kj T,( )
Q S T T S 0 0,,( )
-
8/3/2019 Zhou Paper
22/36
QUANTITATIVE STRATEGIES RESEARCH NOTESSachsGoldman
18
between the old and new distributions. Once th e new r isk-neut ra l dis-
tribution is obtained, we can update the quotes for the rest of the
options by valuing th em off the n ew distribut ion.
Here are some examples. Consider a hypothetical index whose current
value is 100. Suppose th e th ree-month , at -the-money volatility is 24%,
and the thr ee-month skew is linear in str ike with a slope corr espond-
ing to a two-volatility-point increase per ten-strike-point decline, as
displayed in Figure 10a. The heavy X in th e figure shows the one newlyobserved implied volatility, assumed to rise of four implied volatility
points, from 26% to 30%, for the 90-strike put. Figure 10b shows the
cha nge in the risk-neut ra l implied distr ibution obta ined by minimizing
the cha nge in distributiona l entr opy consistent with one n ew implied
volatility. The increase in 90-strike implied volatility has led to a sig-
nificant hump in the risk-neutra l distribution below the 90 level.
Finally, Figure 10c shows both the old and new skews, the lat ter com-puted from the n ew risk-neut ra l distribution. The new estimat ed skew
differs from t he old in a non-obvious way: it h as not sh ifted pa ra llel to
accommodate the one new item of information, but instead suggests
th at th e skew slope will increa se as a r esponse to th is shock.
Figure 9 shows several more examples where the volatility at one par-
ticular strike is shocked. Note that shifts in at-the-money volatility
seem t o lead t o par allel shifts in t he skew, wherea s shifts in out-of-th e-
money volatility lead t o cha nges in slope a s well as level.
End-of-Day Mark To
Market
At the end of a trading day, volatility traders need to re-mark all of
th eir options positions. Often, only th e liquid str ikes ha ve tr aded close
to the end of th e day, and, if th e last t ra ded option has u nder gone a sig-
nificant change in implied volatility, one needs to estimate the appro-
priate skew for the remaining, less liquid options, based on the new
information. Our model of minimizing the relative entropy provides a
ready solution to the problem. In the examples shown in Figure 9, one
could plau sibly mar k to ma rk et th e rest of options using th e solid lines
as our best guesses for closing volatilities.
Filling Gaps In
Investors Market
Views
Risk ar bitr ageurs, speculators, an d other situat ion-driven investors
often have very specific, but not necessarily complete, views on the
mar ket. For inst ance, risk ar bitr ageurs t aking a position in t he stocks
of two companies involved in a merger or acquisition may estimate a
90% probability that the deal will be completed and the stock will move
-
8/3/2019 Zhou Paper
23/36
19
QUANTITATIVE STRATEGIES RESEARCH NOTESSachsGoldman
above a certain target level within three months. Suppose tha t theywould like to take positions in stock and options to implement this
belief.
Although the arbitrageurs have a firm opinion about only one segment
of the probability distribution, a more complete distribution can be
helpful in constructing strategies and determining reasonable prices.
How can we fill the gap and extract the arbitrageursmarket distribu-
ImpliedVolatility(%)
15
20
25
30
Strike Level
80 90 100 110 1201
5
20
25
30
80 90 100 110 120
FIGURE 9. The shifts in skew that result from minimizing the entropy changeof the new risk-neutral distribution to acc ommodate a shift in one impliedvolatility, as shown by the arrows below.
FIGURE 10. (a) The initial skew (dashed line) and the one newly observed implied volatility (X).(b) The initial (dashed line) risk-neutral distribution and the new (solid line) risk-neutraldistribution. (c) The new skew (solid line), with grea ter negative slope.
Strike Level
ImpliedVolatility
(%)
80 90 100 110 120
20
25
30
X
X
(b)
Index Level
Probability(%)
50 100 150
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
Strike Level
ImpliedVolatility
(%)
80 90 100 110 120
20
25
30
X
X
(a) (b)
X
(a) (b) (c)
-
8/3/2019 Zhou Paper
24/36
QUANTITATIVE STRATEGIES RESEARCH NOTESSachsGoldman
20
t ion based on their specific prediction that the market has a 90%
chance of moving above the target level? One good starting point is to
use t he option implied distribut ion, P, as a pr ior distribution, and th en
find a new distribution, Q, tha t sa tisfies the a rbitra geurs 90% proba-bility estimate
where S T is th e a rbitra geurs t ar get stock price. Again t he model of
minimizing the relative entropy provides a natural solution to this
problem.
Q S T S 0 0,;,( ) SdS T
0.9=
-
8/3/2019 Zhou Paper
25/36
21
QUANTITATIVE STRATEGIES RESEARCH NOTESSachsGoldman
CONCLUDING
REMARKS
Investors in equity options have two problems that compound each
other : the ma ny th ousan ds of equity underlyers an d th e presence of a
un ique volatility skew for ea ch of them. For ma ny th inly-tr aded sin gle
stock and basket options, it is difficult or impossible to get adequat einformation on the market skew.
In this paper, we have employed a systematic, semi-empirical method
for estimating the risk-neut ra l distribution of any under lyer, stock or
basket, whose historical returns are available. This method, originally
used by St ut zer (1996), involves t he det erm ina tion of a n ew, risk-neu-
tr alized historical distr ibution (RNHD) for an u nder lyer by minimizing
the relative entropy between the historical distribution and the risk-
neut ra l distribution.
Using the RNHD, we can comput e t he estimated fair implied volatili-
ties of options of any strike and expiration. We can apply this methodto i ll iquid or thinly-t raded derivat ives where market prices are
unavailable.
We have defined a new metric, the strike-adjusted spread, or SAS, for
gauging t he valu e of options whose prices ar e kn own. SAS is th e differ-
ence between an options implied volatility an d its fair volatility as
estimated using the RNHD. This spread represents the richness in vol-
atility points of an option, compared to the history of its underlyer.
Most often, in liquid markets, we calibrate the SAS to be consistent
with cur rent at-the-money volatility, so tha t it becomes a measu re of
skew richness as compared with history. The SAS ranking cannot be
used blindly; it depends on th e u sers selection of the historical periodmost r elevant to the curr ent ma rket.
There a re m an y other applicat ions of the m ethod of minimal relative
ent ropy we have illust ra ted in th is paper. One ma y choose as a pr ior a n
existing optionsimplied distribution, or any other distribution reflect-
ing subjective mar ket views. We h ope th at this pr actical m ethod an d
its extensions will help investors make more rational decisions about
value in volatility markets.
-
8/3/2019 Zhou Paper
26/36
QUANTITATIVE STRATEGIES RESEARCH NOTESSachsGoldman
22
APPENDIX A:
INFORMATION AND
ENTROPY
Pr obability measur es th e un certa inty about t he occur rence of a single
random event. For a given random variable X, what can we deduce
from a s ingle obs erva t ion t ha t ?
Information Information 9 changes our view of the world. It seems obvious that the
amount of informat ion conveyed by the observat ion that should
depend on how likely this event was previously assumed to be. If a
stock was expected to go up the next day by everyone, and it actually
went down, the surprising outcome is certainly more informative than
th e expected out come. We wan t t o quan tify the n otion of events p rovid-
ing inform at ion.
We seek a funct ion that can represent the informat ion provided
by the occurrence of the event whose probabil ity was assumed
to be p. We require that be a non-negat ive and decreasing func-tion ofp; our intuition says th at I( ) is non-negative becau se th e occur -
ren ce of the event mu st provide some inform at ion; similarly, I( ) must
decrease w it h increasing p because the more l ikely we thought the
event wa s, the less inform at ion it s occurr ence provides.
Consider Xand Y to be two independen t ra ndom variables, an d assum e
that
(A 1)
Since Xand Y are independent, we have the joint probability
(A 2)
Wh en bot h in dep en den t even t s, a n d , occu r, t h e a ss oci-
ated information I( ) of each mu st a dd to the t ota l, so th at
(A 3)
Differentiate Equation 3 first with respect to p and similarly with
respect t o q to obta in
(A 4)
Dividing the fir st equ at ion by th e second, we obtain
x=
9. See Kullback, S. (1967), an d Cover et al. (1991).
X x=
I p( )X x=
I p( )
P X x=( ) p and P Y y=( ) q= =
P X x Y y=;=( ) pq=
X x= Y y=
I p q( ) I p( ) I q( )+=
qpq( )
I pq( )p
I p( )=
pp q( ) I p q( )
q I q( )=
-
8/3/2019 Zhou Paper
27/36
23
QUANTITATIVE STRATEGIES RESEARCH NOTESSachsGoldman
or
(A 5)
Since q and p are independent variables, each term in Equa tion 5 must
be a constant , denoted , so that
Since an event with probability q = 1 p rovides no in form a t ion , .Sin ce , a nd sin ce we r equ ir ed t ha t I( ) be a non-negative and
decreasing fun ction ofq, the consta nt c mu st be positive. From now on
we set , which defines the conventional size of a unit of informa-
tion. The information provided by the occurrence of an event whose
probability wa s p is th erefore given by
(A 6)
Entropy The probability a ssigned to a single event is a measure of the u ncer-
ta inty of its occurr ence. The entropy of a random variable R , whose ith
occur rence in th e distribution h as probability p i, is defined t o be the
expected value of the information from the occurrence of an event in
the distribution, na mely
(A 7)
Since any pr obabilityp i is less th an or equal to 1, th e entr opy is always
positive.
A large expected value of information means that the distribution was
broad, with a wide spread of probabilities. A small expected informa-
tion means the distribution was relatively narrow, so that not much
informa tion can be gained from t he occurr ence of an expected event.
Qua litat ively, th erefore, you can see th at H represents t he uncertainty
in th e distribu tion: lar ge (sma ll) avera ge informa tion H corr esponds to
q
p----
p
I p( )
q
I q
( )
-------------------=
qq
I q( ) p
p
I p( )=
c
I q( ) c q( )ln A+=
A 0=0 q 1
c 1=
I p( ) p( )ln=
H R( ) p i p ilogi 1=
n
=
-
8/3/2019 Zhou Paper
28/36
QUANTITATIVE STRATEGIES RESEARCH NOTESSachsGoldman
24
high (low) uncertainty.Entropy is th e math emat ical function th at m ea-
sures the uncertainty of a distribut ion . This is consistent with our int u-
ition t hat maximum entr opy corr esponds t o maximum uncerta inty.
If t he distribution collapses to one certain single event j whose
, a ll other , then H = 0, a m inimum . You can a lso show
tha t t he entr opy takes its ma ximum value, log(n), when for
a ll i, i.e. when a ll out comes ha ve an equa l cha nce and th ere is maxima l
uncertainty.
Having established the notion tha t the entr opy of a pr obability distri-
bution reflects the expected amount of information, we can now quan-
tify the informa tion gained u pon chan ging th e distribution a s a result
of new information. Let us assume we have a prior distribution of a
ra ndom var iableXwhich we denote by P. Upon ar rival of new inform a-tion, a posterior distribution Q is established. Wha t is th e consequent
reduction in uncertainty (decrease in entropy) in this process? One
obvious choice is the relative entropy:
(A 8)
The -log( ) fun ction is convex, so th at , by Jen sen s inequ alit y, th e aver -
a ge of t he is gr ea ter t ha n t he -log( ) of t he a ver age of
. Therefore,
Therefore, is s t r ict ly non-negat ive, and is zero if and on ly if
ident ical ly. can be thought of as a dis tance between
two probability dist ribut ions.
To maintain maximum uncertainty given some new information, our
goal is to minimize this relat ive ent ropy or dista nce between t he pr ior
and posterior distributions.
pj 1= p i 0=
p i 1 n=
S P Q,( ) EQ Q Ploglog[ ] q iq i
p i-----log
i= q i
p i
q i-----log
i= =
p i q i( )log
p i q i( )
S P Q,( ) q ip i
q i-----
ilog> p i( )
ilog 1log 0= = =
S P Q,( )P Q S P Q,( )
-
8/3/2019 Zhou Paper
29/36
25
QUANTITATIVE STRATEGIES RESEARCH NOTESSachsGoldman
APPENDIX B:
DETERMINING THE
RISK-NEUTRAL
DISTRIBUTION FROMHISTORICAL RETURNS
Consider a stock whose spot price is . Assume tha t investors believe
the fu ture re turn d is t r ibu tion of the asse t is given by a p r ior
. Our goal is to infer the r isk-neutral dis t r ibut ion
from subject to the const ra in t tha t the
mean of the risk-neutral stock distribution must equal the stock for-
ward price. We determ ine th e risk-neutra l distribution by minimizing
the relative entr opy between P( ) an d Q( ) subject t o Q( ) sat isfying the
forward condition.
We seek so tha t
(B 1)
such th at
(B 2)
and
(B 3)
where is the current r iskless interest rate.
In s ome cases we will also have a good idea of the cur ren t va lue of th e
stocks at -the-money implied volatility. In tha t case we will add to
Equation B2 and Equation B3 the further constraint that the at-the-
money implied volatility produced by the distribution Q( ) is equa l to
th e a t-the-money implied volatility of th e st ock.
Solving the above equa tions, we obta in th e risk-neut ra l distr ibution
(B 4)
where the consta nt can be found numer ically by ensur ing tha t it sat-isfies th e forwar d condition
(B 5)
Because in Equa tion B4 is a lways non -nega t ive, s o is .
S 0
P S0
0 ST
T,;,( )
Q S 0 0 S T T,;,( ) P S 0 0 S T T,;,( )
Q S 0 0 S T T,;,( )
M in S P Q,( ) EQQ S( )P S( )-------------
log=
Q S T( )S T S Td S 0erfT
=
Q S T( ) S Td 1=
rf
Q S 0 0 S T T,;,( )P S 0 0 S;, T T,( )
P S( ) S( )exp Sd--------------------------------------------------- S T( )exp=
Q S 0 0 S T T,;,( )S T S Td S 0erfT
=
P S T( ) Q S T( )
-
8/3/2019 Zhou Paper
30/36
QUANTITATIVE STRATEGIES RESEARCH NOTESSachsGoldman
26
APPENDIX C:
A DERIVATIVE ASSET
ALLOCATION MODEL
AND THE EQUILIBRIUMRISK-NEUTRAL DENSITY
In t his appen dix, we present a simple derivat ive ass et allocation model
and give a possible financial economic interpretation of the results
obtained in this paper based on the maximal entropy principle. Con-
sider an economy in equilibrium with total investor wealth W0. Thereis a market for an equity index, a riskless bond, and a complete range
of derivative instr umen ts on th e index. We assum e th at ther e is a r ep-
resentative investor10 with a subject ive market view expressed
through a conditional probability density , where is
the spot index level. We also assume the return on the riskless bond
over the period T is rf. The representative investor allocates a portion
of the total init ial wealth to the riskless bonds and the remaining
wealth to the risky assets. Let be the portion allocated to risklessbonds, and be the por t ion a lloca ted to r isky asse t s. S ince the
risky a ssets can be r eplicat ed with a portfolio of Arr ow-Debreu securi-
ties, th e investor can sim ply find a n optimal port folio of Arrow-Debreu
securities. An Arrow-Debreu security with parameter E has a price
given by
(C 1)
where is the discount factor and is the
risk-neu tr al pr obability density. The payoff of the Arr ow-Debreu secu-
rity at th e expira tion dat e is, by definition,
(C 2)
Let be th e port ion of th e fr act ion a lloca ted to r isky
assets t ha t is invested in Arr ow-Debreu security with pa ra meter E. At
th e end of period T, the t ota l investor wea lth will be
(C 3)
where
(C 4)
Note th at
(C 5)
10. See Consta nt inides (1982).
P S 0 0 S T T,;,( ) 0
1
S t t E T,;,( ) DQ S t E T ,;,( )=
D 1 1 rf+( )= Q S t t E T,;,( )
S T T E T,;,( ) S T E( )=
E( )d E 1
WT S T( ) W0 1 rf 1 ( ) E( )rE S T( ) Ed+ +[ ]=
rE S T( ) S T T E T,;,( ) S t t E T,;,( )
S t t E T,;,( )-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
S T E( )
DQ S t E T ,;,( )-------------------------------------- 1=
E r E ( )Q S t t E T,;,( )d rf=
-
8/3/2019 Zhou Paper
31/36
27
QUANTITATIVE STRATEGIES RESEARCH NOTESSachsGoldman
If the representat ive investor changes the al locat ion , the sup-
ply and demand for the Arrow-Debreu security will also change and
t hus s o will t he s hape of t he r is k-neu t r a l densit y funct ion
. Therefore, to achieve a market equilibrium, the repre-
sent at ive investor mu st solve th e asset allocation problem by maximiz-
in g t he expect ed u tilit y :
(C 6)
subject to th e constr aints:
(C 7)
where the expectation operator Ep is under m easur e P. The first order
conditions for t he const ra ined optimization problem ar e
(C 8)
(C 9)
(C 10)
(C 11)
(C 12)
and
(C 13)
wh er e a re t hr ee La gr an ge m ult iplier s cor respon din g t o
the three constra ints in Equation C7, respectively. From Equation C8
and C9 we obtain
E( )d E
Q S t t E T,;,( )
U WT( )
M a x E p U WT( )[ ]{ }
E( ) Q E( ),,{ }
budget constraint: E( ) E= 1dnormalization: Q E( ) E= 1d
forwar d constr aint: Q E( )E E=S 0 1 rf+( )d
EP U' WT( )W0 rf E( )rE S T( ) Ed( )[ ] 0=
EP U' WT( )W0 1 ( )rE S T( )[ ] 1 for E=
E( ) Ed 1=
EP U' WT( )'W0 1 ( ) E( ) S T E( )
DQ2
E( )---------------------------------------- 2 3E for E+=
Q E( ) Ed 1=
Q E( )E Ed S 0 1 rf+( )=1 2 and 3, ,
-
8/3/2019 Zhou Paper
32/36
QUANTITATIVE STRATEGIES RESEARCH NOTESSachsGoldman
28
(C 14)
and
(C 15)
From Equat ions C8, C14 and C15 we have
(C 16)
where
(C 17)
Using Equat ions C11, C15 and C16, we get
(C 18)
Using th e const ra ints (C12) an d(C13), Equ at ion (C16) leads t o
(C 19)
These results so far ar e independent of the pa rt icular functional form
of the utility function as long as the utility function is monotonically
increasing and concave. We now specialize in an exponential utility
given by
(C 20)
Using Equat ions C16, C17, C18 and C20, one can sh ow th at
(C 21)
where consta nt c0 and c1 satisfy
(C 22)
EP U' WT( )rE S T( )[ ]1
W0 1 ( )---------------------------=
EP U' WT( )[ ]1
W0 1 ( )rf---------------------------------=
Q S 0 t S;, T T,( )U' WT S T( )( )
EP U' WT( )[ ]---------------------------------- P S 0 t S T T,;,( )=
WT E( ) W0 1 rf+( ) 1 ( ) E( )
DQ E ( )-------------------+=
E( )Q E( )--------------
rf
1 rf+---------------
21------
31------E+=
21------ 31
------S 0 1 rf+( )+ 1 rf+rf---------------=
U WT( ) bWT( ) with b 0>exp=
Q S t t E T,;,( ) P S t t E T,;,( ) c0 c1E( )exp=
c0 b W0 1 rf+( ) EP U' b[ ]( )2
EP U' b[ ]---------------------------log=
-
8/3/2019 Zhou Paper
33/36
29
QUANTITATIVE STRATEGIES RESEARCH NOTESSachsGoldman
(C 23)
and t ha t we have, using Equa tion C17,
(C 24)
We can now car ry out th e optimization program as follows.
Step 1. From Equations C21, C12 and C13, we can n um er ica lly solve
for const an t c0 and c1, and thus obtain the risk-neutral distribution
Q. We point out th at the consta nt c0 and c1 (and thus the r isk-neu-
tr al distribution Q) is independent of the par amet er, b, of the u tility
function. It only depends on th e prior distr ibution P, and t he forwar dprice constraint Equa tion C13! The pa rameter b is characteristic of
th e represent at ive investors risk a version. It is essential tha t t he
risk-neu tr al distribut ion be indepen dent of th e investors risk aver-
sion! In our derivation of distribution Q, we relied only on the fact
th at th e investors u tility fun ction is of exponentia l form .
Step 2. From Equa tion C24, we ca n solve for , wh ich does
depend on para meter b.
Step 3. Fr om Equa tion C23, we can solve for .
Step 4. From Equa tions C15, C19 and C22 we solve for , , a nd
.
Fina lly, th e r epresen ta tive investors a llocation of the Arr ow-Debreu
security with parameter E, (E), can be found from Equation C18,which of cour se depends on th e risk avers ion pa ra met er b.
The most important feature of this solution to the asset allocation
problem is tha t the r isk-neut ra l p robability dens ity funct ion
is of th e form given by Equa tion C21 subject t o th e nor-
malization constr aint and Equa tion C13. This is th e sam e solution a s
that given by the minimal relative entropy approach in Equation B4,
provided tha t the represent at ive investor chooses th e r ealized histori-cal distr ibution as t he su bjective prior dist ribut ion P.
c1
3EP U' b[ ]---------------------------=
EP U' b[ ] bW0 1 rf+( ) Q E( )Q E( )P E( )--------------log Ed
exp=
EP U' b[ ]
3
1 2
Q S t t S T T,;,( )
-
8/3/2019 Zhou Paper
34/36
QUANTITATIVE STRATEGIES RESEARCH NOTESSachsGoldman
30
REFERENCES Buchen, P.W. and M. Kelly, 1996, Journal of Financial and Quanti ta -
tive Analysis, 31 , pp. 143 - 159.
Const an tinides, G.M., 1982, The Journal Of Business, 55 , No. 2.
Cover, T.M. and J.A. Thomas, 1991, Elements of Information Theory,
New York, J ohn Wiley & Sons.
Derman, E., I. Kani and J. Zou, 1996. The Local Volatility Surface,
Financial Analysts Journal, July/August, pp. 25-36.
Derm an , E., M. Kam al, I. Kani, an d J. Zou, 1997, Is the Volatility Skew
Fair?, Goldm an, S achs Qu antitative S trategies R esearch N otes
Gulko, L., 1996, Yale U niver sity Work ing Pa per.
Kullback, S., 1967, Informat ion Theory and Statist ics, New York,Dover Publications, Inc.
Stutzer, M., 1996, A Simple Nonparametric Approach to Derivative
Security Valua tion,J. of Finance, 51 . pp. 1633 - 1652.
Stutzer, M., and M. Chowdhury, 1999, A Simple Non-Param etric
Approach to Bond Fut ures Options Pr icing, Journal of Fixed Income,
March 1999, pp. 67-76.
-
8/3/2019 Zhou Paper
35/36
31
QUANTITATIVE STRATEGIES RESEARCH NOTESSachsGoldman
SELECTED QUANTITATIVE STRATEGIES PUBLICATIONS
Ju ne 1990 Understanding Guaranteed Exchange-Rate
Contracts In Foreign S tock Inv estm entsEma nuel Derma n, Piotr Kara sinski and J effrey Wecker
Ja n. 1992 Valuing and Hedging Outperform ance Options
Eman uel Derma n
Mar. 1992 Pay-On-Exercise Op tions
Eman uel Derma n and Iraj Kani
Ju ne 1993 Th e Ins and Outs of Barrier Options
Eman uel Derma n and Iraj Kani
Ja n. 1994 Th e Volatility Sm ile and Its Im plied TreeEman uel Derma n and Iraj Kani
May 1994 Static Options Replication
Eman uel Derma n, Deniz Ergener and Iraj Kani
May 1995 Enha nced N um erical Methods for Options
with Barriers
Ema nuel Derman , Iraj Kani, Deniz Er gener
and Indraji t Bardha n
Dec. 1995 The Local Volatility Surface: Unlocking the
Inform ation in Ind ex Option Prices
Ema nuel Derma n, Ira j Kani and J oseph Z. Zou
Feb. 1996 Implied Trin omial Trees of the Volatility S m ile
Ema nuel Derman , Iraj Kani an d Neil Chriss
Apr. 1996 Model Risk
Eman uel Derma n
Aug. 1996 Tradin g and Hedging L ocal Volatility
Ira j Kani, Eman uel Derma n an d Michael Kamal
Apr. 1997 Is the Volatility Skew Fair?
Ema nuel Derman , Michael Kama l, Ira j Kani
an d J oseph Zou
Apr. 1997 Stochastic Implied Trees: Arbitrage Pricing with
S tochastic Term and S trike S tructure of Volatility
Eman uel Derma n and Iraj Kani
-
8/3/2019 Zhou Paper
36/36
QUANTITATIVE STRATEGIES RESEARCH NOTESSachsGoldman
Sept. 1997 Th e Patterns of Change in Im plied Ind ex Volatilities
Micha el Kama l and Ema nuel Derman
Nov. 1997 Predicting the Response of Implied Volatility to LargeIndex Moves: An October 1997 S&P Case Study
Ema nuel Derman and J oe Zou
Sept. 1998 How to Value and Hedge Options on Foreign Ind exes
Kresimir Demeter fi
Ja n. 1999 Regimes of Volatility: S ome Observations on the
Variation of S&P 500 Implied Volatilities
Eman uel Derman
Mar. 1999 More Than You Ever Wanted to Know About Volatility
SwapsKresimir Demeterfi, Ema nuel Derman , Michael Kama l
an d J oseph Zou