© 2001 prentice hall5-1 international business by daniels and radebaugh chapter 5 international...
Post on 19-Dec-2015
225 views
TRANSCRIPT
© 2001 Prentice Hall 5-1
International Businessby
Daniels and Radebaugh
Chapter 5International TradeTheory
© 2001 Prentice Hall 5-2
ObjectivesTo explain trade theoriesTo discuss how global efficiency can be increased through free
tradeTo introduce prescriptions for altering trade patternsTo explore how business decisions influence international
trade
© 2001 Prentice Hall 5-3
Companies’ International Operations Link Countries Economically
OBJECTIVES
STRATEGY
MEANS OF OPERATING• Importing and exporting goods and services (trade)• Transferring production factors, such as labor and capital, internationally
Country BCountry A
© 2001 Prentice Hall 5-4
IntroductionTrade in goods and services is one means by which countries
are linked economicallyTypes of trade theories
• Descriptive—deal with natural order of trade– examine and explain trade patterns under laissez-
faire conditions• Prescriptive—concerned with government interference in
the free movement of goods and services– considers governments’ affect on the amount,
composition, and direction of trade• Both types of theories
– provide insights about markets for exports and potentially successful export products
– help companies determine where to locate production facilities
© 2001 Prentice Hall 5-5
MercantilismFoundation of economic thought from 1500—1800
• Intended to benefit colonial powers– colonies supplied commodities to the mother country– mother country tried to run trade surpluses with their
own colonies• A country’s wealth determined by its holding of treasure,
usually gold• Countries should export more than they import
– favorable balance of trade– governments imposed restrictions on imports– governments subsidized many products that could
not otherwise compete in domestic or export markets• Mercantilism faded after 1800
Neomercantilism—attempt to achieve favorable trade balances to achieve social or political objectives
© 2001 Prentice Hall 5-6
Absolute AdvantageAdam Smith—different countries produce some goods more
efficiently than other countries• Free trade increases global efficiency• Each country will specialize in products that give it a
competitive advantage– labor becomes more skilled by repeating tasks– no time lost switching from production of one kind to
production of another kind– long production runs provide incentives for
development of more effective work methods• Natural advantage—stems from climatic conditions,
access to certain natural resources, or availability of certain labor forces
• Acquired advantage— based on technology and skill development
– product technology – process technology
© 2001 Prentice Hall 5-7
Production Possibilities with Absolute AdvantageASSUMPTIONS for Sri Lanka1. 100 units of resources available2. 10 units to produce a ton of wheat3. 4 units to produce a ton of tea4. Uses half of total resources per product when there is no foreign trade
ASSUMPTIONS for United States1. 100 units of resources available2. 5 units to produce a ton of wheat3. 20 units to produce a ton of tea4. Uses half of total resources per product when there is no foreign trade
PRODUCTION Tea Wheat (tons) (tons)
Without Trade: Sri Lanka (point A) 12.5 5 U.S. (point B) 2.5 10 Total 15.0 15
With Trade: Sri Lanka (point C) 25 0 U.S. (point D) 0 20 Total 25 20
U.S. production possibilities
10Quantity of Wheat (tons)
0 5 15 20 25
5
10
15
20
25
Qu
anti
ty o
f T
ea (
ton
s)
A
B
C
D
Sri Lankan production possibilities
© 2001 Prentice Hall 5-8
Comparative AdvantageDavid Ricardo—gains from trade will occur even in a country
that has absolute advantage in all products because the country must give up less-efficient output to produce more-efficient output
Country should specialize in products it can make most efficiently, even if other countries can make the product more efficiently
Theory accepted by most economists• Theory is influential in promoting policies for freer trade
© 2001 Prentice Hall 5-9
Production Possibilities with Comparative AdvantageASSUMPTIONS for Sri Lanka
1. 100 units of resources available
2. 10 units to produce a ton of wheat
3. 10 units to produce a ton of tea
4. Uses half of total resources per product
when there is no foreign trade
PRODUCTION Tea Wheat (tons) (tons)
Without Trade: Sri Lanka (point A) 5 5 U.S. (point B) 10 12.5 Total 15 17.5
With Trade (increasingtea production): Sri Lanka (point C) 10 0 U.S. (point D) 6 17.5 Total 16 17.5
ASSUMPTIONS for United States
1. 100 units of resources available
2. 4 units to produce a ton of wheat
3. 5 units to produce a ton of tea
4. Uses half of total resources per product
when there is no foreign trade
10Quantity of Wheat (tons)
0 5 15 20 25
5
10
15
20
25
Qu
anti
ty o
f T
ea (
ton
s)C
D E
U.S. production possibilities
A
B
Sri Lankan production possibilities
With Trade (increasingtea production): Sri Lanka (point C) 10 0 U.S. (point E) 5 18.75 Total 15 18.75
© 2001 Prentice Hall 5-10
Assumptions and Limitations of Theories of SpecializationBoth absolute and comparative advantage theories are based
on specialization• Countries should trade output based on their own
specialization for the output from other countries specialization
Full employment— not valid assumptionEconomic efficiency objective—countries’ goals may not be
limited to economic efficiencyDivision of gains—if trading partner is perceived to be gaining
too large a share of benefits, other partner may forgo absolute gains to prevent relative losses
Two countries, two commodities—original two-country, two-product logic applies to more complex situations
Transport costs—may negate advantages of tradingSize of economy and production scales—longer production
runs, less production abroad
© 2001 Prentice Hall 5-11
Factor-Proportion TheoryEli Heckscher and Bertil Ohlin—relative factor costs lead
countries to excel in the production and export of products that used their abundant, and therefore cheaper, production factors
Land-labor relationship—in countries in which there are many people relative to the amount of land, land price is very high because it’s in demand
• Land costs and technology dictate what types of industries choose to locate in a country
Labor-capital relationship— production factors, especially labor, are not as homogeneous as assumed
• Labor skills vary within and among countries due to differences in training and education
– led to international specialization by task to produce a given product
Technological complexities—the same product can be produced by different methods (labor or capital)
© 2001 Prentice Hall 5-12
Product Life Cycle Theory of Trade (PLC)Raymond Vernon—the production location for many products
moves from one country to another depending on the stage in the product’s life cycle
Stage 1: Introduction• Innovation, production, and sales in same country
– new products developed in response to nearby observed need and markets for them
– early production occurs in domestic location• Location and importance of technology
– most new technology that results in new products and production methods originates in industrial countries
• Exports and labor– export small part of production– production process likely to be labor intensive– capital machinery for large-scale production develops
later in industrialized countries
© 2001 Prentice Hall 5-13
Product Life Cycle Theory of Trade (cont.)Stage 2: Growth
• Increases in exports by the innovating country• More competition• Increased capital intensity
– growing sales offer incentives to companies to develop process technology
• Some foreign productionStage 3: Maturity
• Decline in exports from the innovating country• More product standardization• More capital intensity• Increased competitiveness of price• Production start-ups in emerging countries
Stage 4: Decline• Production increased in emerging economies• Innovating country becoming net importer
© 2001 Prentice Hall 5-14
Product Life Cycle Theory of Trade (cont.)Verification and limitations of plc theory
• High transportation costs limit export opportunities, regardless of the life cycle stage
• Shifts in production site do not change for many types of products
– innovating country maintains its export ability throughout the life cycle
» products with very short life cycles» luxury products for which cost is not a concern
for the consumer» products used to promote differentiation strategy» products requiring specialized technical labor to
evolve• MNEs increasingly introduce new products at home and
abroad simultaneously
© 2001 Prentice Hall 5-15
Country-Similarity TheoryEconomic similarity of industrial countries
• Most of the world’s trade occurs among countries that have similar characteristics
– country similarity theory—once a company has developed a new product to serve needs in a local market, it will turn to markets it sees as most similar to those at home
– most trade takes place among industrial countries because:
» growing importance of acquired advantage as opposed to natural advantage
» markets in industrial countries can support products and their variations
» importance of industrial markets due to their size» incomes are high and people buy more
• Few emerging countries trade with each other
© 2001 Prentice Hall 5-16
World Trade by Major Product Category asPercentage of Total World Trade for Selected Years
1980 1990 1998
100
80
60
40
20
0
Per
cent
age
53.9
27.7
14.7
3.7
70.7
14.2
12.3
2.8
62.8
7.9
8.6
20.7
Commercial services
Manufactured products
Mining products
Agricultural products
© 2001 Prentice Hall 5-17
Country-Similarity Theory (cont.)Similarity of location
• Distances among countries accounts for many world trade relationships
• Methods to overcome distance disadvantages are difficult to maintain
Cultural similarity• Importers and exporters find it easier to do business in a
country perceived as being similar• Historic colonial relationships explain much of
international tradeSimilarity of political and economic interests
• Political relationships and economic agreements among countries may discourage or encourage trade between them or their companies
• Military conflicts disrupt trade patterns• Political animosity may interfere with trading channels
© 2001 Prentice Hall 5-18
Degree of DependenceIndependence—complete economic independence
• Country has no reliance on other countries for goods, services, or technologies
• Price of independence is having to do without goods that cannot be produced domestically
• Hinders country’s ability to borrow and adapt existing technologies
Interdependence— trade based on mutual need• Neither trading partner is likely to cut off supplies or
markets for fear of retaliation• Governments may be pressured to sustain trade
Dependence—developing countries rely heavily on:• The sale of one commodity for export earnings
– 25 % of emerging countries sell one commodity• One country as supplier or customer• Industrialized countries
© 2001 Prentice Hall 5-19
Strategic Trade PolicyGovernmental role and influence in affecting the acquired
advantage of production within their borders• Alter conditions for industries in general
– change conditions that affect factor proportions, efficiency, and innovation
• Target conditions for a specific industry– typically results in no more than small payoffs
» hard to identify and target appropriate industries» too many countries identify the same industry,
leading to excessive competition» relative conditions change, causing relative
capabilities to change as well– have been a few notable government successes in
targeting a specific industry
© 2001 Prentice Hall 5-20
The Porter DiamondIndicates four important conditions for competitive superiority
• Demand conditions—observation of need or demand– usually in home country– production started near the observed market
• Factor conditions— availability and terms for acquiring them
• Related and supporting industries—existence of infrastructure
• Firm strategy, structure, and rivalry– influenced by other three conditions
Existence of the four favorable conditions does not guarantee that an industry will develop in a locale
Absence of one of the four conditions from a country may not inhibit companies from becoming globally competitive
© 2001 Prentice Hall 5-21
Determinants of Global Competitive Advantage:The Porter Diamond
DemandConditions
FactorConditions
Related andSupportingIndustries
Firm Strategy,Structure, and
Rivalry
© 2001 Prentice Hall 5-22
Companies’ Role in TradeMost trade theories based on a national perspective
• Decisions to trade are usually made by companiesStrategic advantages of exports
• Use of excess capacity—companies leverage their competencies by using them abroad
• Cost reduction– experience curve effect—cost reductions stemming
from increased output• Freater profitability—may have higher profit margins in
foreign markets• Risk spreading—counterbalance business cycles in
different countriesStrategic advantages of imports
• Procurement of supplies abroad may lower costs• Foreign products complement existing products• Reduces dependence on single suppliers