研提推動大眾捷運系統建設與營運 永續發展機制之研究

31
1 研研研研研研研研研研研研研研研 研研研研研研研研研研研研研研研 研研研研研研研研研 研研研研研研研研研 研研研研研 研研研 研研研研研 研研研 研研研研研 研研研 研研研研研 研研研 研研研 研研研 研研研 研研研 研研研 研研研 研研研研研研研研 Institute of Transportation, MOTC 研研研研研 . 研研研研 研 . 研研研研 研. 研研研研研 2010.02.10.

Upload: isra

Post on 15-Jan-2016

134 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

交通部運輸研究所 Institute of Transportation, MOTC. 研提推動大眾捷運系統建設與營運 永續發展機制之研究. 計畫主持人 張學孔 協同主持人 孫以濬 洪鈞澤 賴勇成 鄭永祥. 【 簡報大綱】 壹. 背景說明 貳. 重要成果 叁. 結論與建議. 2010.02.10. MRT/ operation MRT/ planning High Speed Rail Bus Lane/Network. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

  • *

    . . . 2010.02.10.

  • : : 90: 5,600:127:
  • 270,350.27%!

  • MRT /MRTOD ? /MRTORG ?Intermodal StationMobility/AccessibilityUrban DesignNode vs. PlaceFinancial SustainabilityTransit StationTransit VillageBBMW: Bike+Bus+Metro+Walk

  • 18018961%36%3%57%33%2%8%: /2007 Source:THI Consultants, Inc ,2008: ???

    Chart1

    684.3

    189.3

    78%

    22%

    Sheet1

    684.3189.3

    Chart1

    111.2645.12006

    108.362.52.915.6

    Railway

    Bus

    Airline

    HSR

    Sheet1

    20062007

    Railway111.2108.3

    Bus6462.5

    Airline5.12.9

    HSR15.6

  • *. - MRTLRTBRT

  • *. - MRTLRTBRT10

  • *. -

    MRT

  • *. -

    LRT

  • *. -

    BRT

  • *BRT31. -

  • *.

  • *. -

  • *

  • *GDP

  • *

  • *

  • *MRT7,000//LRTBRT7,000//MRT4,500/LRT1,300/4,000/BRT800/GDPMRT40,000LRTGDP15,000BRTGDP10,000MRT400LRT100400BRT200400. -

  • *.

  • *

    ()

    ()

  • *. -

    Chart3

    0.26990.4890.5067

    0.6390.60160.6168

    1.15521.12431.1514

    1.6441.44551.4802

    1.60271.61911.6443

    1.49581.05041.0634

    1.68421.1151.1411

    1.02151.0471.087

    1.05611.08731.1322

    1.04711.07991.1223

    1.06891.08781.136

    1.08131.0781.1364

    [/][//]

    MRTMRTLRTBRTMRTLRTBRT

    118,9862,81342

    1,150,00015,15276

    1,065,75310,87598

    550,0005,304104

    1,290,0006,463200

    8,040,00025,736312

    3,803,56217,774214

    2,939,7267,313402

    208,2191,361153

    4,213,61617,593240

    LRT

    100,6031,19384

    118,1921,65871

    550,6852,503220

    51,5073,43415

    183,5623,99046

    68,4931,85137

    229,0415,85839

    273,9735,10254

    1,498,6304,528331

    109,0003,10535

    364,38410,08036

    BRT

    1,3154430

    1,000,00014,92567

    224,9861,03758270

    130,0008,22716

    70,0002,94523.77

    261,9188,44931

    60,0002,25827

    293,4009,11232

    21,8281,55914

    ////2030...

    9017911.0N/A123N/A1,045

    17911.0N/A137N/A945

    17911.0N/A85N/A835

    79470,00030.03,70070,806,100N/A174

    500,00038.03,76092,133,100N/A171

    443,00036.73,71391,346,100N/A174

    546,00050.53,834113,069,100N/A181

    792029243,11623.61,54129,6271,33610,869

    256,00024.81,62830,4301,38111,467

    391,08335.12,66946,1502,02514,357

    429,00037.52,94048,711N/AN/A

    79258,70840.5N/A67,9707,094265415/

    257,36541.5N/A67,9707,094381279/

    362,37948.5N/A67,9707,094486509/

    79571,55234.6N/A56,7111,77762.5

    533,20034.1N/A56,6631,77783.0

    98641,00019.9N/A115,143N/A11,073

    96414,40017.1N/A89,334N/A12,898

    92148,57417.13,8935,9901,3024,380

    171,54416.34,4137,3041,4024,470

    174,68116.14,4627,2841,4034,467

    177,61817.14,5727,2851,0394,649

    Sheet1

    562.7

    1356.5

    0.4148175452

    []

    850.26990.4890.506710.5

    860.6390.60160.616832.4

    871.15521.12431.151440.3

    881.6441.44551.480256.4

    891.60271.61911.644365.1

    901.49581.05041.063465.1

    911.68421.1151.141165.1

    921.02151.0471.08765.1

    931.05611.08731.132267

    941.04711.07991.122367

    951.06891.08781.13674.4

    961.08131.0781.136474.4

    858687888990919293949596

    []10.532.440.356.465.165.165.165.1676774.474.4

    000

    000

    000

    000

    000

    000

    000

    000

    000

    000

    000

    000

  • *

    2007GDP()(/2)20082008/km21657.518.05%0.94% (2008)388,9792,93017486.753.27%3.11% (2008)2,622,9239,6505305.922.24%1.68% (2008)1,066,1286,5248623.784.13%0.01% (2008)1,958,6861,6042365.131.38%0.16% (2008)405,3713,8921902.6N/AN/A503,273353955.680.05%2.6% (2008)273,7934,5615095.580.03%0.03% (2008)1,557,9447591657.08N/A0.39% (2008)531,7531292009.360.19%0.08% (2008)548,7312893581.07N/A0.12% (2007)1,104,5525483292.692.10%0.2% (2008)768,4534,3757734.123.86%0.58% (2008)1,525,6429,9334548.380.66%0.08% (2008)1,243,412445785.591.08%1.76% (2008)231,849661546.236.51%0.09% (2008)460,90221516958.4816.90%0.67% (2004)3,833,7301,8681896.17N/AN/A560,397308279.68N/AN/A1,312,9351,2223709.27N/AN/A723,6745612959.50.05%0.01% (2008)884,8383191180.58N/AN/A341,43374

  • *. 31MRTLRTBRT

  • *.

  • *. MRT7,000//LRTBRT7,000//MRT4,500/LRT1,300/4,000/BRT800/()GDPMRT40,000LRTGDP15,000BRTGDP10,000MRT400LRT100400BRT200400

  • *.

  • *. BRTLRT

  • *.

  • World BankADBUNEP(Energy Foundation) IEA:Bus Rapid TransitMRTLRT BRTBRT+BRT(Curitiba)(Ottawa) 1980BRT2000BRTBRTBRT

    *

  • (1)(2)(3) +(4)(TOD)

    (5)(Alternatives Analysis)(6)(7)(8)

    *

  • * , !

    **********Inter-City Travel Demand along Taiwan Western CorridorFrom the pie chart, we can see that 78% of the travelers still use private car, while public transport modal share is only 22%.Compared the modal split of public transport 2006200720065%****************************************************