cognitive radio technologies, 2008 1 jeff reed [email protected] [email protected] (540) 231 2972...

22
Cognitive Radio Technologies, 2008 1 C ognitive R adio Technologies C ognitive ognitive R adio adio T echnologies echnologies CRT CRT CRT Jeff Reed [email protected] [email protected] (540) 231 2972 James Neel [email protected] (540) 230-6012 www.crtwireless.com CERDEC February 5, 2008 Cognitive Radio

Upload: ralf-watts

Post on 05-Jan-2016

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Cognitive Radio Technologies, 2008 1 Jeff Reed reedjh@vt.edu reedjh@crtwireless.com (540) 231 2972 James Neel James.neel@crtwireless.com (540) 230-6012

Cognitive Radio Technologies, 2008

1Cognitive RadioTechnologiesCCognitiveognitive RRadioadioTTechnologiesechnologies

CRTCRTCRT

Jeff [email protected]@crtwireless.com(540) 231 2972

James [email protected](540) 230-6012www.crtwireless.com

CERDECFebruary 5, 2008

Cognitive Radio

Page 2: Cognitive Radio Technologies, 2008 1 Jeff Reed reedjh@vt.edu reedjh@crtwireless.com (540) 231 2972 James Neel James.neel@crtwireless.com (540) 230-6012

Cognitive Radio Technologies, 2008

2

Jeffrey H. Reed• Director, Wireless @ Virginia Tech• Willis G. Worcester Professor, Deputy

Director, Mobile and Portable Radio Research Group (MPRG)

• Authored book, Software Radio: A Modern Approach to Radio Engineering

• IEEE Fellow for Software Radio, Communications Signal Processing and Education

• Industry Achievement Award from the SDR Forum

• Highly published. Co-authored – 2 books, edited – 7 books.

• Previous and Ongoing CR projects from– ETRI, ONR, ARO, Tektronix

• Email: [email protected]

Page 3: Cognitive Radio Technologies, 2008 1 Jeff Reed reedjh@vt.edu reedjh@crtwireless.com (540) 231 2972 James Neel James.neel@crtwireless.com (540) 230-6012

Cognitive Radio Technologies, 2008

3

James Neel• President, Cognitive Radio Technologies,

LLC• PhD, Virginia Tech 2006• Textbook chapters on:

– Cognitive Network Analysis in – Data Converters in Software Radio: A

Modern Approach to Radio Engineering– SDR Case Studies in Software Radio: A

Modern Approach to Radio Engineering– UWB Simulation Methodologies in An

Introduction to Ultra Wideband Communication Systems

• SDR Forum Paper Awards for 2002, 2004 papers on analyzing/designing cognitive radio networks

• Email: [email protected]

Cognitive RadioTechnologiesCCognitiveognitive RRadioadioTTechnologiesechnologies

CRTCRTCRT

Page 4: Cognitive Radio Technologies, 2008 1 Jeff Reed reedjh@vt.edu reedjh@crtwireless.com (540) 231 2972 James Neel James.neel@crtwireless.com (540) 230-6012

Cognitive Radio Technologies, 2008

4

Presentation Overview

• (22) Introductory Material – Definitions, applications

• (76) Implementation Issues– Architectures, sensing, classification, decisions

• (39) Networking Issues– Problems and different approaches to mitigate those

problems

• (14) Ongoing Efforts– Commercial, University, Military

• (19) Conclusions

Page 5: Cognitive Radio Technologies, 2008 1 Jeff Reed reedjh@vt.edu reedjh@crtwireless.com (540) 231 2972 James Neel James.neel@crtwireless.com (540) 230-6012

Cognitive Radio Technologies, 2008

5

What is a Cognitive Radio?

Concepts, Definitions

Page 6: Cognitive Radio Technologies, 2008 1 Jeff Reed reedjh@vt.edu reedjh@crtwireless.com (540) 231 2972 James Neel James.neel@crtwireless.com (540) 230-6012

Cognitive Radio Technologies, 2008

6

Cognitive Radio: Basic Idea• Software radios permit network or

user to control the operation of a software radio

• Cognitive radios enhance the control process by adding– Intelligent, autonomous control of the radio– An ability to sense the environment– Goal driven operation– Processes for learning about

environmental parameters– Awareness of its environment

• Signals• Channels

– Awareness of capabilities of the radio– An ability to negotiate waveforms with

other radios

Board package (RF, processors)

Board APIs

OS

Software ArchServices

Waveform Software

Co

ntr

ol

Pla

ne

Page 7: Cognitive Radio Technologies, 2008 1 Jeff Reed reedjh@vt.edu reedjh@crtwireless.com (540) 231 2972 James Neel James.neel@crtwireless.com (540) 230-6012

Cognitive Radio Technologies, 2008

7

Definer

Adapts (Intelligently)

Autonom

ous

Can sense

Environm

ent

Transm

itter

Receiver

“Aw

are” Environm

ent

Goal D

riven

Learn the E

nvironment

“Aw

are” Capabilities

Negotiate W

aveforms

No interference

FCC Haykin IEEE 1900.1 IEEE USA ITU-R Mitola NTIA SDRF CRWG SDRF SIG VT CRWG

Cognitive Radio Capability Matrix

Page 8: Cognitive Radio Technologies, 2008 1 Jeff Reed reedjh@vt.edu reedjh@crtwireless.com (540) 231 2972 James Neel James.neel@crtwireless.com (540) 230-6012

Cognitive Radio Technologies, 2008

8

Why So Many Definitions?• People want cognitive radio to be something

completely different– Wary of setting the hype bar too low– Cognitive radio evolves existing capabilities– Like software radio, benefit comes from the paradigm shift in

designing radios

• Focus lost on implementation– Wary of setting the hype bar too high– Cognitive is a very value-laden term in the AI community– Will the radio be conscious?

• Too much focus on applications– Core capability: radio adapts in response changing operating

conditions based on observations and/or experience – Conceptually, cognitive radio is a magic box

Page 9: Cognitive Radio Technologies, 2008 1 Jeff Reed reedjh@vt.edu reedjh@crtwireless.com (540) 231 2972 James Neel James.neel@crtwireless.com (540) 230-6012

Cognitive Radio Technologies, 2008

9

OODA Loop: (continuously)• Observe outside world• Orient to infer meaning of

observations• Adjust waveform as

needed to achieve goal• Implement processes

needed to change waveform

Other processes: (as needed)

• Adjust goals (Plan)• Learn about the outside

world, needs of user,…

Urgent

Allocate ResourcesInitiate Processes

Negotiate Protocols

OrientInfer from Context

Select AlternateGoals

Plan

Normal

Immediate

LearnNew

States

Observe

OutsideWorld

Decide

Act

User Driven(Buttons)Autonomous

Infer from Radio Model

StatesGenerate “Best” Waveform

Establish Priority

Parse Stimuli

Pre-process

Cognition cycle

Conceptual Operation[Mitola_99]

Page 10: Cognitive Radio Technologies, 2008 1 Jeff Reed reedjh@vt.edu reedjh@crtwireless.com (540) 231 2972 James Neel James.neel@crtwireless.com (540) 230-6012

Cognitive Radio Technologies, 2008

10

Typical Cognitive Radio Applications

What does cognitive radio enable?

Page 11: Cognitive Radio Technologies, 2008 1 Jeff Reed reedjh@vt.edu reedjh@crtwireless.com (540) 231 2972 James Neel James.neel@crtwireless.com (540) 230-6012

Cognitive Radio Technologies, 2008

11

Measurements averaged over six locations:

1. Riverbend Park, Great Falls, VA,

2. Tysons Corner, VA, 3. NSF Roof, Arlington, VA, 4. New York City, NY 5. NRAO, Greenbank, WV,6. SSC Roof, Vienna, VA

~25% occupancy at peak

Modified from Figure 1 in Published August 15, 2005 M. McHenry in “NSF Spectrum Occupancy Measurements Project Summary”, Aug 15, 2005. Available online: http://www.sharedspectrum.com/?section=nsf_measurements

Bandwidth isn’t scarce, it’s underutilized

Page 12: Cognitive Radio Technologies, 2008 1 Jeff Reed reedjh@vt.edu reedjh@crtwireless.com (540) 231 2972 James Neel James.neel@crtwireless.com (540) 230-6012

Cognitive Radio Technologies, 2008

12

RandomAccess

TDMAPrimary Signals

Opportunistic Signals

Conceptual example of opportunistic spectrum utilization

Page 13: Cognitive Radio Technologies, 2008 1 Jeff Reed reedjh@vt.edu reedjh@crtwireless.com (540) 231 2972 James Neel James.neel@crtwireless.com (540) 230-6012

Cognitive Radio Technologies, 2008

13

• RF components are expensive• Cheaper analog implies more spurs and out-of-band

emissions• Processing is cheap and getting

cheaper • Cognitive radios will adapt

around spurs (just another interference source) or teach the radio to reduce the spurs

• Better radios results in still more available spectrum as the need arises.

• Likely able to exploit SDR

Cognitive radio permits the deployment of cheaper radios

Page 14: Cognitive Radio Technologies, 2008 1 Jeff Reed reedjh@vt.edu reedjh@crtwireless.com (540) 231 2972 James Neel James.neel@crtwireless.com (540) 230-6012

Cognitive Radio Technologies, 2008

14

Improved Link Reliability• Cognitive radio is aware of

areas with a bad signal• Can learn the location of the

bad signal– Has “insight”

• Radio takes action to compensate for loss of signal– Actions available:

• Power, bandwidth, coding, channel, form an ad-hoc network

– Radio learns best course of action from situation

Good Transitional PoorSignal Quality

Can aid cellular system Inform system & other radios of identified gaps

Page 15: Cognitive Radio Technologies, 2008 1 Jeff Reed reedjh@vt.edu reedjh@crtwireless.com (540) 231 2972 James Neel James.neel@crtwireless.com (540) 230-6012

Cognitive Radio Technologies, 2008

15

Automated Interoperability• Basic SDR idea

– Use a SDR as a gateway to translate between different radios

• Problems– Which devices are present?– Which links to support?– With SDR some network

administrator must answer these questions

• Basic CR idea– Let the cognitive radio observe

and learn from its environment in an automated fashion.

Page 16: Cognitive Radio Technologies, 2008 1 Jeff Reed reedjh@vt.edu reedjh@crtwireless.com (540) 231 2972 James Neel James.neel@crtwireless.com (540) 230-6012

Cognitive Radio Technologies, 2008

16

Spectrum Trading• Underutilized spectrum

can be sold to support a high demand service– Currently done in Britain– Permitted in US among

public safety users• Currently has a very long

time scale (months)• Faster spectrum trading

could permit for significant increases in available bandwidth– How to recognize need and

availability of additional spectrum?

– Environment + context awareness + memory

Page 17: Cognitive Radio Technologies, 2008 1 Jeff Reed reedjh@vt.edu reedjh@crtwireless.com (540) 231 2972 James Neel James.neel@crtwireless.com (540) 230-6012

Cognitive Radio Technologies, 2008

17

Collaborative Radio• A radio that leverages the

services of other radios to further its goals or the goals of the networks.

• Cognitive radio enables the collaboration process– Identify potential

collaborators– Implies observations

processes

• Classes of collaboration– Distributed processing– Distributed sensing

Page 18: Cognitive Radio Technologies, 2008 1 Jeff Reed reedjh@vt.edu reedjh@crtwireless.com (540) 231 2972 James Neel James.neel@crtwireless.com (540) 230-6012

Cognitive Radio Technologies, 2008

18

Cooperative Antenna Arrays• Concept:

– Leverage other radios to effect an antenna array

• Applications:– Extended vehicular coverage– Backbone comm. for mesh

networks– Range extension with

cheaper devices

• Issues:– Timing, mobility– Coordination– Overhead

source

destination

Transmit Diversity

Cooperative MIMO

Source Cluster Relay cluster

First Hop Second Hop

Source Cluster Relay cluster

First Hop

Source Cluster Relay cluster

First Hop

Source Cluster Relay cluster

First Hop

Source Cluster Relay cluster

First Hop

Source Cluster Relay cluster

First Hop

Destination Cluster

Page 19: Cognitive Radio Technologies, 2008 1 Jeff Reed reedjh@vt.edu reedjh@crtwireless.com (540) 231 2972 James Neel James.neel@crtwireless.com (540) 230-6012

Cognitive Radio Technologies, 2008

19

Other Opportunities for Collaborative Radio (1/3)

• Distributed processing– Exploit different

capabilities on different devices

• Maybe even for waveform processing

– Bring extra computational power to bear on critical problems

• Useful for most collaborative problems

• Collaborative sensing– Extend detection range by

including observations of other radios

• Hidden node mitigation

– Improve estimation statistics by incorporating more independent observations

– Immediate applicability in 802.22, likely useful in future adaptive standards

Page 20: Cognitive Radio Technologies, 2008 1 Jeff Reed reedjh@vt.edu reedjh@crtwireless.com (540) 231 2972 James Neel James.neel@crtwireless.com (540) 230-6012

Cognitive Radio Technologies, 2008

20

Other Opportunities for Collaborative Radio (2/3)

• Improved localization– Application of

collaborative sensing– Security– Friend finders

• Reduced contention MACs– Collaborative

scheduling algorithms to reduce collisions

– Perhaps of most value to 802.11

• Some scheduling included in 802.11e

Page 21: Cognitive Radio Technologies, 2008 1 Jeff Reed reedjh@vt.edu reedjh@crtwireless.com (540) 231 2972 James Neel James.neel@crtwireless.com (540) 230-6012

Cognitive Radio Technologies, 2008

21

Other Opportunities for Collaborative Radio (3/3)

• Distributed mapping– Gather information relevant to

specific locations from mobiles and arrange into useful maps

– Coverage maps• Collect and integrate signal

strength information from mobiles

• If holes are identified and fixed, should be a service differentiator

– Congestion maps• Density of mobiles should

correlate with traffic (as in automobile) congestion

• Customers may be willing to pay for real time traffic information

• Theft detection– Devices can learn which

other devices they tend to operate in proximity of and unexpected combinations could serve as a security flag (like flagging unexpected uses of credit cards)

– Examples:• Car components that expect

to see certain mobiles in the car

• Laptops that expect to operate with specific mobiles nearby

Page 22: Cognitive Radio Technologies, 2008 1 Jeff Reed reedjh@vt.edu reedjh@crtwireless.com (540) 231 2972 James Neel James.neel@crtwireless.com (540) 230-6012

Cognitive Radio Technologies, 2008

22

Summary• Cognitive radio evolves the

software radio concept to permit intelligent autonomous adaptation of radio parameters– Significant variation in definitions

of “cognitive radio”– Question of how “cognitive” the

radio is• Numerous new applications

enabled– Opportunistic spectrum

utilization, collaborative radio, link reliability, advanced network structures

• Differing implementation approaches– Many applications

implementable with simple algorithms

– Greater flexibility achievable with a cognitive engine approach

• Many objectives will require development of a cognitive language

• In a network, adaptations of cognitive radios interact– Interaction can be mitigated with

policy, punishment, cost adjustments, centralization or potential games

• Commercial implementations starting to appear– 802.22, 802.11h,y, 802.16h– And may have been around for

a while (cordless phones with DFS)