licyblog/detail/sat-scores-by-state-2014 licyblog/detail/sat-scores-by-state-2014

28
Comparing the States http:// www.commonwealthfoundation.org/policyb log/detail/sat-scores-by-state-2014 Comparisons can be tricky! Bases for comparison: D&M, Ch. 1 Population growth Race and ethnicity Political ideology (liberal/conservative) Political culture Religious practice Socioeconomic characteristics Education, income, health, etc.

Upload: elmer-patterson

Post on 18-Jan-2018

226 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

 “united States” or “United States”?  We knew we needed a defense alliance to fight the Revolution, but it was unclear at the time whether we would subsequently be one large nation or a collection of smaller, semi- independent “nation-states.”  So we won the Revolution…now what?

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: licyblog/detail/sat-scores-by-state-2014  licyblog/detail/sat-scores-by-state-2014

Comparing the States http://

www.commonwealthfoundation.org/policyblog/detail/sat-scores-by-state-2014

Comparisons can be tricky! Bases for comparison: D&M, Ch. 1

Population growth Race and ethnicity Political ideology (liberal/conservative) Political culture Religious practice Socioeconomic characteristics

Education, income, health, etc.

Page 2: licyblog/detail/sat-scores-by-state-2014  licyblog/detail/sat-scores-by-state-2014

THE STATES WERE HERE FIRST.

The states existed before the national government did. They

are not creations of the national government.

Page 3: licyblog/detail/sat-scores-by-state-2014  licyblog/detail/sat-scores-by-state-2014

Declaration of Independence

“united States” or “United States”? We knew we needed a defense

alliance to fight the Revolution, but it was unclear at the time whether we would subsequently be one large nation or a collection of smaller, semi-independent “nation-states.”

So we won the Revolution…now what?

Page 4: licyblog/detail/sat-scores-by-state-2014  licyblog/detail/sat-scores-by-state-2014

Fear of Tyranny Thomas Jefferson believed that government which

is closer to the people is less likely to be tyrannical, and should therefore be given more power.

“Closer to the people” means state, rather than national, government. Jeffersonian philosophy anticipated that the states would be more powerful than the national government.

Alexander Hamilton and the Federalists favored a stronger national government.

The Jeffersonians won, at first. The Articles of Confederation (1781-1787) established a very weak national government.

Page 5: licyblog/detail/sat-scores-by-state-2014  licyblog/detail/sat-scores-by-state-2014

Articles of Confederation http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/artconf.asp National government had no power to raise or

pay a military States were required to maintain an active militia Unicameral legislature, one vote per state

regardless of population Nine votes out of 13 required to pass most

legislation Some significant legislation had to be unanimous Delegates to Congress were considered to be

officials of their states (who paid them), not officials of the national government

Page 6: licyblog/detail/sat-scores-by-state-2014  licyblog/detail/sat-scores-by-state-2014

State Powers under the Articles of Confederation

States could conduct their own foreign policies, and make treaties with other nations, with the consent of the national Congress

States could impose their own tariffs on foreign goods as long as the tariff was reciprocal or did not conflict with national treaties with France and Spain.

States could issue their own declarations of war if actually invaded or informed of imminent attack by Indians; this had to eventually be approved by national Congress.

Page 7: licyblog/detail/sat-scores-by-state-2014  licyblog/detail/sat-scores-by-state-2014

Competing Federal and State powers

Both national and state governments had the power to coin money. This, combined with the states’ ability to conduct their own trade policies, meant we had 13 state economic systems instead of one national economy.

Page 8: licyblog/detail/sat-scores-by-state-2014  licyblog/detail/sat-scores-by-state-2014

Revising the Articles The Articles of Confederation were

soon found to provide too little power to the national government. The Constitutional Convention which met in Philadelphia in 1787 was originally intended only to revise the Articles and correct some specific problems, but it was quickly decided to create an entire new system of government.

Page 9: licyblog/detail/sat-scores-by-state-2014  licyblog/detail/sat-scores-by-state-2014

Federalism Division of power and responsibility

between national and state governments. In our system, each has specified powers and responsibilities that they can’t take away from each other.

Unitary system (>90% of world’s governments): National government gives only the power to provinces, lower divisions that it wants to delegate.

Confederation: Smaller units of government give only the power to the national government that they want to delegate.

Page 10: licyblog/detail/sat-scores-by-state-2014  licyblog/detail/sat-scores-by-state-2014

State Power Under the Constitution

The Constitution made the national government more powerful and the states less powerful than had been the case under the Articles. In order for the states to ratify this arrangement, certain guarantees of state power had to be made.

The Constitution guarantees each state a republican form of government and protection “against Invasion.”

Page 11: licyblog/detail/sat-scores-by-state-2014  licyblog/detail/sat-scores-by-state-2014

State Powers Given Up to the National Government Under the Constitution

The national government has exclusive responsibility for foreign policy

States no longer conduct their own foreign policy or have tariff power against other countries

The national government has primary responsibility for military defense (state militias still exist in the form of the National Guard, which may be mobilized for national defense)

Page 12: licyblog/detail/sat-scores-by-state-2014  licyblog/detail/sat-scores-by-state-2014

State Powers Given Up to the National Government Under the

Constitution The national government coins money

and regulates international and interstate commerce

States may not impose tariffs on each other’s goods

Supremacy Clause: The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land; in the event of a conflict between the USC and a state policy, the USC prevails.

Page 13: licyblog/detail/sat-scores-by-state-2014  licyblog/detail/sat-scores-by-state-2014

Federal vs. State Responsibility Federal: National economy, foreign policy, defense State/local: Education, health, welfare, transportation,

most law enforcement But the federal government provides funding for many

activities which are carried out by state and local government (Pell Grants, Medicaid, highway funding)

What happens if a state feels that the federal government is failing to fulfill its responsibilities in a given area? Arizona immigration example, D&M Ch. 1

D&M, p. 21: Chart on how state and local governments spend their money, an indication of how significant each of their policy responsibilities may be

Page 14: licyblog/detail/sat-scores-by-state-2014  licyblog/detail/sat-scores-by-state-2014

Compromises Among the States In order to get enough states to agree to

ratify the Constitution, certain compromises had to be made:

Large states and small: Connecticut Compromise based the House of Representatives on equal population and the Senate on equal representation by state

North and South: Importation of slaves banned by 1808 (but not immediately), and Three-Fifths Compromise on population counted for representation

Page 15: licyblog/detail/sat-scores-by-state-2014  licyblog/detail/sat-scores-by-state-2014

States as Institutions Represented in Fed. Government

The Senate Constitutional Amendments The Electoral College The Tenth Amendment

The Senate: Originally, the Senate represented “the states” while the

House represented “the people” Senators are chosen to represent their states as a whole States have equal representation regardless of population Senators were originally chosen by state legislatures until the

17th Amendment was ratified in 1913 The Governor, subject to state law, may make a temporary

appointment to fill a vacancy (not true in all states)

Page 16: licyblog/detail/sat-scores-by-state-2014  licyblog/detail/sat-scores-by-state-2014

More on the Senate The Constitution, and Senate rules, allow

a small number of states to block action which doesn’t serve their interests

22 Senators from 11 Southern states were able to block civil rights legislation until the 1950’s and 1960’s even though the rest of the country supported it

Page 17: licyblog/detail/sat-scores-by-state-2014  licyblog/detail/sat-scores-by-state-2014

States as Institutions in Fed. Gov’t.

Amendment process: Legislatures or ratifying conventions in three-quarters of the states must approve a Constitutional amendment after passage by Congress or a Constitutional Convention

Page 18: licyblog/detail/sat-scores-by-state-2014  licyblog/detail/sat-scores-by-state-2014

The Electoral College The President and Vice President are not

chosen in a national election, but in 51 separate elections (each state plus DC)

This requires not a majority of the vote, but a majority of the vote distributed in a certain way: A majority of the vote in each one of a group of states which make up a majority of the Electoral College

Usually but not always (as in 2000) equal to a majority of the population

This protects state interests

Page 19: licyblog/detail/sat-scores-by-state-2014  licyblog/detail/sat-scores-by-state-2014

The Electoral College Smaller states have disproportionate influence

because of the two extra electoral votes corresponding to the Senators

State legislatures have the power to determine how electors are chosen (“in such manner as the legislature thereof may direct”) Majority vote winner in every state gets all of the

electoral vote Exceptions: Nebraska and Maine award one

electoral vote to the winner in each Congressional District and two to the winner of the state as a whole (Obama got one electoral vote in Nebraska in 2008)

Page 20: licyblog/detail/sat-scores-by-state-2014  licyblog/detail/sat-scores-by-state-2014

The Electoral College All 50 states and DC have laws

providing that electors are chosen by popular vote, but a legislature could change that if they chose There is no right under the US

Constitution for individuals to vote for President

A legislature may choose the electors themselves (Florida would have in 2000, SC did until being readmitted after the Civil War)

Page 21: licyblog/detail/sat-scores-by-state-2014  licyblog/detail/sat-scores-by-state-2014

The Bill of Rights The Anti-Federalist political movement

opposed the Constitution as originally drafted because, in their view, it gave too much power to the national government. Several states (including North Carolina and Rhode Island) expressed a reluctance to ratify the Constitution unless further curbs were placed on the national government. So Congress passed the Bill of Rights (first ten Amendments) and sent it to the states for ratification.

Page 22: licyblog/detail/sat-scores-by-state-2014  licyblog/detail/sat-scores-by-state-2014

The Bill of Rights Most of the Bill of Rights restricts the

national government’s power to curb individual behavior (protection of freedom of speech, religion, etc.), but the protection of the states’ power is specified by the Tenth Amendment:

“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”

Page 23: licyblog/detail/sat-scores-by-state-2014  licyblog/detail/sat-scores-by-state-2014

The Bill of Rights The Constitution gives the national

government certain specified powers; It prohibits the states from having

certain specified powers; Unless the Constitution specifies one or

the other, the assumption is that the states and the people may do something, while the federal government may not.

States and people can do anything the Constitution doesn’t say they can’t.

National government can only do what the Constitution says it can.

Page 24: licyblog/detail/sat-scores-by-state-2014  licyblog/detail/sat-scores-by-state-2014

Competition and Conflict Between the National Government and the States

McCulloch v. Maryland (1815): U.S. Supreme Court ruling that national laws take precedence over state laws. The State of Maryland had no authority to tax the Baltimore branch of the Bank of the United States (a U.S. government agency).

Slavery and segregation: Did the federal government have the power to restrict state government policies in these areas?

Today, states are asserting power in response to what they see as federal inaction to curb illegal immigration.

Page 25: licyblog/detail/sat-scores-by-state-2014  licyblog/detail/sat-scores-by-state-2014

“States’ Rights” The phrase “states’ rights” is generally

associated in contemporary usage with support for slavery in the 19th Century and for legally mandated racial segregation in the 20th. In both cases, the Southern states saw the national government as abusing its power and violating the states’ authority to govern their own affairs and make their own policies. They saw the federal government’s position (against the expansion of slavery, for integration of public facilities) as fundamentally threatening to their social and economic structures.

Page 26: licyblog/detail/sat-scores-by-state-2014  licyblog/detail/sat-scores-by-state-2014

States’ Rights However, there is nothing inherently racist,

pro-slavery, pro-segregation or anti-democratic about the philosophy that the states are better equipped than the federal government to make policies and handle problems (this was Jefferson’s belief).

Tension between different levels of government over whose power and responsibility it is to make those decisions is one which always exists within a system of separated, checked and balanced power, as it does between Congress and the President.

Page 27: licyblog/detail/sat-scores-by-state-2014  licyblog/detail/sat-scores-by-state-2014

Entering (and Leaving) the Union

The Constitution provides that new states may be admitted on an equal basis with the existing states, by vote of Congress. 37 states have been admitted since the original 13.

The right to secede is not discussed in the Constitution (either in favor or against). When the former Confederate states were readmitted to the Union after the Civil War, they explicitly renounced the right to secede.

Page 28: licyblog/detail/sat-scores-by-state-2014  licyblog/detail/sat-scores-by-state-2014

Territories and Other Areas Places that are not states may be governed by

Congress with some limited self-government. The District of Columbia (the Constitution specifies that

Congress has jurisdiction over the nation’s capital; DC has a locally elected mayor and City Council whose decisions may be overturned by Congress)

Puerto Rico is a commonwealth with limited autonomy Guam, the Virgin Islands, the Northern Mariana Islands,

and American Samoa are territories. Most non-original states were territories or parts of

territories before they were admitted to the Union.