record price and volatility levels > need to start hedging your commodity exposures? treasury hot...
Post on 21-Dec-2015
218 views
TRANSCRIPT
Record price and volatility levels > need to start hedging your commodity exposures?
Treasury Hot Topics Seminar
19 February 2009
Agenda
Audience perspectiveA view on the marketsEvolution of Commodity MarketsWhere philosophy meets strategyCRM related issuesWrap up and conclusion
Agenda
Audience perspectiveA view on the marketsEvolution of Commodity MarketsWhere philosophy meets strategyCRM related issuesWrap up and conclusion
Slide 4
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Audience perspectiveShare your point of view
Audience perspective
Question n°1 – Treasurer’s viewpoint
How would you rank your company’s exposure to commodity risk compared to other financial risks?
Slide 5
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Audience perspectiveShare your point of view
Audience perspective
Question n°2 – Management awareness
How would you qualify your company’s top management level of awareness to commodity price risk issues?
Slide 6
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Audience perspectiveShare your point of view
Audience perspective
Question n°3 – Identification and quantification
Does a centralised view of your company’s commodity exposures exist and are these exposures quantified?
Slide 7
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Audience perspectiveShare your point of view
Audience perspective
Question n°4 – Where is the exposure managed
Where is the commodity price risk managed within your company?
Slide 8
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Audience perspectiveShare your point of view
Audience perspective
Question n°5 – How is the exposure managed
What type of instrument do you use to manage the commodity price risk?
Slide 9
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Audience perspectiveShare your point of view
Audience perspective
Question n°6 – Financial instruments type
What type of financial instrument do you use or would you consider using to manage the commodity price risk (multiple answers possible)?
Agenda
Audience perspectiveA view on the marketsEvolution of Commodity MarketsWhere philosophy meets strategyCRM related issuesWrap up and conclusion
Slide 11
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Chinese Imports – ICE Brent – LME Copper
A view on the markets
0,00
100,00
200,00
300,00
400,00
500,00
600,00
700,00
04/0
4/01
04/0
7/01
04/1
0/01
04/0
1/02
04/0
4/02
04/0
7/02
04/1
0/02
04/0
1/03
04/0
4/03
04/0
7/03
04/1
0/03
04/0
1/04
04/0
4/04
04/0
7/04
04/1
0/04
04/0
1/05
04/0
4/05
04/0
7/05
04/1
0/05
04/0
1/06
04/0
4/06
04/0
7/06
04/1
0/06
04/0
1/07
04/0
4/07
04/0
7/07
04/1
0/07
04/0
1/08
04/0
4/08
04/0
7/08
04/1
0/08
04/0
1/09
Time
100
= 0
4/04
/200
1
ICE Brent Chinese imports LME Copper Cash price
Source: Bloomberg data and PwC analysis
Slide 12
PricewaterhouseCoopers
ICE Brent & Airlines Filings
A view on the markets
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
04/0
4/20
01
04/0
7/20
01
04/1
0/20
01
04/0
1/20
02
04/0
4/20
02
04/0
7/20
02
04/1
0/20
02
04/0
1/20
03
04/0
4/20
03
04/0
7/20
03
04/1
0/20
03
04/0
1/20
04
04/0
4/20
04
04/0
7/20
04
04/1
0/20
04
04/0
1/20
05
04/0
4/20
05
04/0
7/20
05
04/1
0/20
05
04/0
1/20
06
04/0
4/20
06
04/0
7/20
06
04/1
0/20
06
04/0
1/20
07
04/0
4/20
07
04/0
7/20
07
04/1
0/20
07
04/0
1/20
08
04/0
4/20
08
04/0
7/20
08
04/1
0/20
08
04/0
1/20
09
Dates
US
D/B
bl
Brent
US Airways
United Airlines
Air CanadaUS Airways
Aloha Airlines
Northwest & Delta Airlines
Maxjet Airways
Aloha – ATA – Skybus – Frontier – EOS Airlines
Source: Recession.org and PwC analysis
Slide 13
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Brent - From a backwardation to a contango market (1/2)
A view on the markets
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
01/0
1/20
01
01/0
4/20
01
01/0
7/20
01
01/1
0/20
01
01/0
1/20
02
01/0
4/20
02
01/0
7/20
02
01/1
0/20
02
01/0
1/20
03
01/0
4/20
03
01/0
7/20
03
01/1
0/20
03
01/0
1/20
04
01/0
4/20
04
01/0
7/20
04
01/1
0/20
04
01/0
1/20
05
01/0
4/20
05
01/0
7/20
05
01/1
0/20
05
01/0
1/20
06
01/0
4/20
06
01/0
7/20
06
01/1
0/20
06
01/0
1/20
07
01/0
4/20
07
01/0
7/20
07
01/1
0/20
07
01/0
1/20
08
01/0
4/20
08
01/0
7/20
08
01/1
0/20
08
01/0
1/20
09
Time
US
D/B
bl
Contango (+) Backwardation (-)
ICE Brent 36 Months – ICE Brent Spot
BackwardationContango Back
Contango
Source: Bloomberg data and PwC analysis
Slide 14
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Brent - From a backwardation to a contango market (2/2)
A view on the markets
31/0
1/20
04
31/0
3/20
04
31/0
5/20
04
31/0
7/20
04
30/0
9/20
04
30/1
1/20
04
31/0
1/20
05
31/0
3/20
05
31/0
5/20
05
31/0
7/20
05
30/0
9/20
05
30/1
1/20
05
31/0
1/20
06
31/0
3/20
06
31/0
5/20
06
31/0
7/20
06
30/0
9/20
06
30/1
1/20
06
31/0
1/20
07
31/0
3/20
07
31/0
5/20
07
31/0
7/20
07
30/0
9/20
07
30/1
1/20
07
31/0
1/20
08
31/0
3/20
08
31/0
5/20
08
31/0
7/20
08
30/0
9/20
08
30/1
1/20
08
31/0
1/20
09
Spot
24-M
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
USD/Bbl
Time
140-160
120-140
100-120
80-100
60-80
40-60
20-40
0-20
Source: Bloomberg data and PwC analysis
Slide 15
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Commodity Markets Volatilities (cont’d)
A view on the markets
Volatility Drivers• Political Risk (e.g. oil and gas)• Weather (e.g. temperature levels, hurricanes in the U.S impact electricity
and gas prices)• Storage capacity and availability of Supply help reduce the volatility
(i.e. electricity cannot be stored and is consequently the most volatile commodity).
• Shortage expectations or bottlenecks in production / refining process• Short-end of the price curve is significantly more volatile than the Long-
end.
Slide 16
PricewaterhouseCoopers
100-days historical Vol – ICE Brent – LME Copper – LME Zinc
A view on the markets
0,00%
10,00%
20,00%
30,00%
40,00%
50,00%
60,00%
70,00%
80,00%
22/08/01
26/12/01
01/05/02
04/09/02
08/01/03
14/05/03
17/09/03
21/01/04
26/05/04
29/09/04
02/02/05
08/06/05
12/10/05
15/02/06
21/06/06
25/10/06
28/02/07
04/07/07
07/11/07
12/03/08
16/07/08
19/11/08
ICE Brent LME Zinc Cash price LME Copper Cash price
Source: Bloomberg data and PwC analysis
Slide 17
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Volatility and contracts maturity
A view on the markets
0,00%
10,00%
20,00%
30,00%
40,00%
50,00%
60,00%
70,00%
80,00%
21/0
5/20
01
21/0
8/20
01
21/1
1/20
01
21/0
2/20
02
21/0
5/20
02
21/0
8/20
02
21/1
1/20
02
21/0
2/20
03
21/0
5/20
03
21/0
8/20
03
21/1
1/20
03
21/0
2/20
04
21/0
5/20
04
21/0
8/20
04
21/1
1/20
04
21/0
2/20
05
21/0
5/20
05
21/0
8/20
05
21/1
1/20
05
21/0
2/20
06
21/0
5/20
06
21/0
8/20
06
21/1
1/20
06
21/0
2/20
07
21/0
5/20
07
21/0
8/20
07
21/1
1/20
07
21/0
2/20
08
21/0
5/20
08
21/0
8/20
08
21/1
1/20
08
Time
100-
day
s h
isto
rica
l Vo
l
Spot
3-M
12-M
24-M
ICE Brent 100-days historical Volatilities
Source: Bloomberg data and PwC analysis
Agenda
Audience perspectiveA view on the marketsEvolution of Commodity MarketsWhere philosophy meets strategyCRM related issuesWrap up and conclusion
Slide 19
PricewaterhouseCoopers
A Bit of History
Evolution of Commodity Markets
From Butter and Cheese…The Butter and Cheese Exchange of New York was founded in 1872..
You may better know its today’s name: NYMEX. Today, the Exchange is the world's leading energy and precious metals market.
Slide 20
PricewaterhouseCoopers
A Bit of History… (cont’d)
Evolution of Commodity Markets
Today, a high number of market places exist and can be used for hedging or speculating on Commodity Risk
… to a wide range of commodities: from oil, gas, electricity and metals to… Vegetable Oil, Cheese, Eggs, Pork Bellies… CO2 and Weather…
Slide 21
PricewaterhouseCoopers
From physical to financial markets (1/2)
Evolution of Commodity Markets
0,0
200,0
400,0
600,0
800,0
1000,0
1200,0
1400,0
1600,0
1800,0
2000,0
GWh
Jan-
00
May
-00
Sep-0
0
Jan-
01
May
-01
Sep-0
1
Jan-
02
May
-02
Sep-0
2
Jan-
03
May
-03
Sep-0
3
Jan-
04
May
-04
Sep-0
4
Jan-
05
May
-05
Sep-0
5
Jan-
06
May
-06
Sep-0
6
Jan-
07
May
-07
Sep-0
7
Jan-
08
May
-08
Sep-0
8
Jan-
09
Month
0,0
200,0
400,0
600,0
800,0
1000,0
1200,0
1400,0
1600,0
1800,0
2000,0
Physical Throughput daily average Net Traded daily Average
Zeebrugge Hub daily average traded volumes and daily average physical throughput
Source: huberator.com
Slide 22
PricewaterhouseCoopers
2001
-1
2001
-4
2001
-7
2001
-10
2002
-1
2002
-4
2002
-7
2002
-10
2003
-1
2003
-4
2003
-7
2003
-10
2004
-1
2004
-4
2004
-7
2004
-10
2005
-1
2005
-4
2005
-7
2005
-10
2006
-1
2006
-4
2006
-7
2006
-10
2007
-1
2007
-4
2007
-7
2007
-10
2008
-1
2008
-4
2008
-7
2008
-10
0
50.000
100.000
150.000
200.000
250.000
300.000
350.000
Th
ou
san
d B
bl
Month
Wold oil production (Average KBbl / day) Average of FUT_AGGTE_VOL (KBbl)
From physical to financial markets (2/2)
Evolution of Commodity Markets
Average daily World Oil production and Brent traded (Thousand barrels)
Source: Bloomberg data and PwC analysis
Slide 23
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Development of New Markets – Weather Derivatives
Evolution of Commodity Markets
• Correlation between their business and climate:- Hot summer of 2003, hot winter 2006-2007, rainy summer 2007…- Concerns regarding global climate change and its impact
• Weather fluctuations is a risk against which companies may wish to be hedged
• Slow to take-off of hedging products due to:- Complex relationship between weather and business performance- “Uniqueness” of the relationship between the business and the
weather (creation of basis risk and sub-optimal hedges)- No medium-long term valuation method (due to uncertainty of weather
forecast) and lack of speculators who could add liquidity in the market
Slide 24
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Development of New Markets – Weather Derivatives (cont’d)
Evolution of Commodity Markets
Example 1: Correlation between temperature and electricity demand in Spain in 1983 and in 1998
Example 2: Influence of T° and rainfalls on the corn yield
Source: Journal of applied meteorology, August 2001, Volume 40, p 1418
Source: WRMA lesson 1a Weather effects on Crop yields, December 2004
Slide 25
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Agenda
Audience perspectiveA view on the marketsEvolution of Commodity MarketsWhere philosophy meets strategyCRM related issuesWrap up and conclusion
Slide 26
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Would you be Winnie the Pooh or the Tigger
Where philosophy meets strategy
"Don't underestimate the value of Doing Nothing, of just going along, listening to all the things you can't hear, and not bothering.“~ Winnie the Pooh
"True mastery can be gained by letting things go their own way. It can't be gained by interfering." ~ Lao Tseu
Source:http://financialphilosopher.typepad.com/
Slide 27
PricewaterhouseCoopers
The call for action
Where philosophy meets strategy
“The market can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent” ~ Keynes
The basic 4 steps approach:
1. Identify
2. Measure
3. Manage
4. Control
Slide 28
PricewaterhouseCoopers
The 4 steps approach (1/5)
1. Identify what the exposure is?• Locate the exposure:
- In which subsidiaries, for which products?- Within purchases, sales, transformation process?
• Identify physical contracts (firm commitments, forecasts) and indexed contracts creating exposure
2. Measure the exposure and your sensitivity• Quantify the exposure (consider netting of exposures, natural hedges,…)• How much does the commodity price represents within my cost structure?• Assess earnings sensitivity to commodity price taking into account
- Commodity price volatility- Volume risk (demand elasticity)
Where philosophy meets strategy
Slide 29
PricewaterhouseCoopers
The 4 steps approach (2/5)
3. Manage the exposure in line with the company’ strategy and objectives (1/4)• Key input from management:
- CFO, Treasurer, Sales Director, Purchase Director, Production Director, Country Managers
• Objectives should be aligned with:- Company business model- Company risk appetite- Shareholders expectations
• Typical objectives:- Zero exposure- Reduce earnings volatility- Lock-in margins and ensure medium term visibility for the business
Where philosophy meets strategy
Slide 30
PricewaterhouseCoopers
The 4 steps approach (3/5)
3. Manage the exposure in line with the company’ strategy and objectives (2/4)How can we manage the risks?• Choice of methodology and instruments:
- Financial hedges- Purchase / sales contracts re-negotiation- Find natural hedges- Process re-organisation
• Centralised V.S. decentralised processes:- Identification of exposures- Reporting process to Group Treasury- Follow-up of forecasts versus actuals- Hedging decision and execution process
Where philosophy meets strategy
Slide 31
PricewaterhouseCoopers
The 4 steps approach (4/5)
3. Manage the exposure in line with the company’ strategy and objectives (3/4)What are the economic and accounting impact of selected strategy?• What are competitors doing? Which are the accounting implications of the
economic choice made,…
How to implement?• Provide training to key stakeholders:
- In which subsidiaries, for which products?- Within purchases, sales, transformation process?
• Customise and automate exposure reporting- Tools, reports,...
Where philosophy meets strategy
Slide 32
PricewaterhouseCoopers
The 4 steps approach (5/5)
3. Manage the exposure in line with the company’ strategy and objectives (4/4)
4. Control the achieved performance• Benchmarking versus
- “No hedge” scenario- Alternative hedging scenario
• Consider whether we achieved our primary objectives- From an economical standpoint (cost effectiveness, competitiveness,
…)- Accounting (do we reflect the economic reality in the accounting?)
Where philosophy meets strategy
Slide 33
PricewaterhouseCoopers
The quantification exercise (1/3)
Measuring the exposure• Across the Group
- Netting opportunities- Local monopolistic markets / legal constraints / non-market driven
prices• Natural hedges / price pass-through mechanism
- Working in both ways• Competitive environment / market practice• Client acceptance for price increase in bull market• Client acceptance for no price decrease in bear market
- Time lags between purchases and sales• How does the commodity volatility impact
- Cost structure- EBIT- Other (covenants working capital requirements,…)
Where philosophy meets strategy
Slide 34
PricewaterhouseCoopers
The quantification exercise (2/3)
Measuring the sensitivity of the cost structure: Air France – Base case HY08
Where philosophy meets strategy
2.972
12.983
639
0
2.000
4.000
6.000
8.000
10.000
12.000
14.000
EUR Mio
Costs Revenues Margin
Employees Aicraft costs Landing fees and end route charges
commercial & distribution costs Handling charges Other
Fuel costs Revenues Margin
Source: AirfranceKLM website
Slide 35
PricewaterhouseCoopers
The quantification exercise (3/3)
Measuring the sensitivity of the cost structure: Air France simulated costs:
• No hedge – 60% jet fuel increase – 50% pass through via fuel surcharge
Where philosophy meets strategy
4.755
12.983
892
-253
-2.000
0
2.000
4.000
6.000
8.000
10.000
12.000
14.000
16.000
EUR Mio
Costs Revenues Margin
Employees Aicraft costs Landing fees and end route charges commercial & distribution costs
Handling charges Other Fuel costs Base Revenues
Fuel surcharge revenues Margin
Source: AirfranceKLM website and PwC simulations
Slide 36
PricewaterhouseCoopers
The need for adequate CRM policies
"Only in quiet waters things mirror themselves undistorted. Only in a quiet mind is adequate perception of the world.“~ Hans Margolius
• Avoid bad timing for decision taking. E.g.- Hedging jet fuel price in July- Clearly sets the rules of the game, the
expectations of the stakeholders• Policies should cover
- Goal- High level strategy- Rationale- Roles & responsibilities- Reporting requirements – KPIs
Where philosophy meets strategy
Slide 37
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Choosing the right strategy upfront (1/2)
"When the mind is in a state of uncertainty the smallest impulse directs it to either side.“~ Terence (195/185 - 159 BC)
Avoid asking yourself the right questions at the wrong moment
• Historical comparison of potential strategies• Building simulation tool • Running what-if analysis• Using stress testing• …
Where philosophy meets strategy
Knowing upfront potential impact of Commodity prices should enable you to
react more quickly and more appropriately
Slide 38
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Choosing the right strategy upfront (2/2)
Historical simulation of jet fuel hedging strategies
Where philosophy meets strategy
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1.000
Q12003
Q22003
Q32003
Q42003
Q12004
Q22004
Q32004
Q42004
Q12005
Q22005
Q32005
Q42005
Q12006
Q22006
Q32006
Q42006
Q12007
Q22007
Q32007
Q42007
Quarters
Jet
fu
el p
rice
(U
SD
/ T
on
)
Scenario 1 - No Hedge Scenario 2 - Systematic Hedge Scenario 3 - Hedge Ratio Cube
Comparability periodHedge build-up period
Source: Bloombreg data and PwC analysis
Slide 39
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Finding the Best Hedge
Do financial instruments exist for the commodities I am exposed to?• Yes
- Are these OTC or exchange traded derivatives?- Is the price transparent?- Is there enough liquidity? And for which maturity?- What would be the cost / benefit of hedging?
• No => Proxy hedging- Do other financial instruments exist for highly correlated commodities?
(Proxy hedging)- How stable is the correlation across time?- How effective is the hedge relationship?
Where philosophy meets strategy
=> Proxy hedging may be the only efficient solution for hedging but
may create additional complexities on the accounting side.
Slide 40
PricewaterhouseCoopers
CRM and the Treasurer
• Commodity Risk Management tends to be placed under the responsibility of the Treasurer when the exposures remain acceptable.- This allows to benefit from the Expertise and the infrastructure of
Treasury.
• This is untrue for companies where Commodity Risk is at the core of the Business (e.g. Utilities, Metal Refining, etc)- Commodity Risk tends to be managed by a distinctive function from
Treasury (need for expert skills and specific systems).
• In the latter case, interaction between Commodity Risk Management and Treasury remains important in order to integrate : - The FX risk dimension (commodities are often USD denominated)- Funding of CRM activities (e.g. margin calls)- Counterparty risk generated by CRM activities (OTC derivatives)
Where philosophy meets strategy
Slide 41
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Section five
Audience perspectiveA view on the marketsEvolution of Commodity MarketsWhere philosophy meets strategyCRM related issuesWrap up and conclusion
Slide 42
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Managing CRM related issues
CRM related issues
Brent swaps
Crack spread swaps
Managing commodity risk comes along with other “side duties”:
RISKCommodity Risk Management
Operational
Counterparty
Foreign Currency
Liquidity
Accounting
Slide 43
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Accounting for Commodity Hedges (1/2)
Specificities for commodities:• Cannot isolate a component of a pricing formula: only the entire change in fair value
of the hedged commodity contract can be hedged- Hedging one component of a price formula would most likely not qualify for
hedge accounting
Proxy hedging - Basis risk• When no exact pricing is available to hedge an exposure, a correlated pricing can
be used which may lead to difference in pricing movement from the hedge item and hedge instrument
Proxy hedging - Quality premium• The quality premium in a pricing formula of a physical contract may not be included
in the pricing formula/index of a financial contract.
CRM related issues
Hedge accounting and effectiveness testing may be difficult to achieve but
solutions do exist.
Slide 44
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Accounting for Commodity Hedges (2/2)
Application of hedge accounting to stack-up strategy• De-designation and Re-designation may need to take place if various derivatives
are packaged to synthetically hedge the exact exposure
CRM related issues
Synthetic jet fuel build-up
0
2.000
4.000
6.000
8.000
10.000
12.000
14.000
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8
Quarter ahead
Vo
lum
e (B
bl)
Brent swaps
Crack spread swaps
Diffs
Slide 45
PricewaterhouseCoopers
FX and Operational risks
Majority of commodities are quoted in USD – FX risk• Chosen policy should incorporate a strategic analysis of interdependency of these
two risks- Managed at the same time?- Manage separately (leave room to benefit from potentially favourable market
movements)
Type of operations – Operational risk
• Need to have adequate structure to manage CRM instruments (derivatives)- FO / MO / BO segregation- Set-up risk committee to monitor CRM activities and take strategic orientations- Follow-up of physically VS financially settled transactions- Adequate systems and tools- Knowledgeable teams / training
=> Treasury is the adequate environment to develop this activity
CRM related issues
Slide 46
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Liquidity and Counterparty risks
High volatility implies important changes in market values – Liquidity risk• Exchange traded derivatives often require the set-up of margining arrangements
- Daily exchange of the Mark-to-Market (MtM) of open contracts• Limited credit risk• Creates additional administrative burden• Creates additional liquidity requirements that may be significant (asymmetric
margining between physical and financial contracts)
Important market values of derivatives can increase the credit risk
• Positive fair value of OTC derivatives not subject to margining create additional credit risk- Requirement for adequate follow-up of trading counterparties- Need to incorporate credit risk within the CRM policies
CRM related issues
Slide 47
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Agenda
Audience perspectiveA view on the marketsEvolution of Commodity MarketsWhere philosophy meets strategyCRM related issuesWrap up and conclusion
Slide 48
PricewaterhouseCoopers
The best moment to fix the roof is when the sun is shining
Wrap up and conclusion
0,00
100,00
200,00
300,00
400,00
500,00
600,00
700,00
04/0
4/20
01
04/0
7/20
01
04/1
0/20
01
04/0
1/20
02
04/0
4/20
02
04/0
7/20
02
04/1
0/20
02
04/0
1/20
03
04/0
4/20
03
04/0
7/20
03
04/1
0/20
03
04/0
1/20
04
04/0
4/20
04
04/0
7/20
04
04/1
0/20
04
04/0
1/20
05
04/0
4/20
05
04/0
7/20
05
04/1
0/20
05
04/0
1/20
06
04/0
4/20
06
04/0
7/20
06
04/1
0/20
06
04/0
1/20
07
04/0
4/20
07
04/0
7/20
07
04/1
0/20
07
04/0
1/20
08
04/0
4/20
08
04/0
7/20
08
04/1
0/20
08
04/0
1/20
09
Time
100
= 0
4/04
/200
1
ICE Brent LME Zinc Cash price LME Copper Cash price Aluminium Cash price
• Is it the right time to hedge the Commodity price risks?• In any case it is the right time to
- Define your CRM strategy- Start managing your commodity risks
Back to the future!• Brent: Dec 2004• Zinc: Dec 2004• Aluminium: Oct
2002• Copper: May 2005
Between 4 and 7 years of price rise have disappeared!
Source: Bloomberg data and PwC analysis
© 2009 PricewaterhouseCoopers. All rights reserved. “PricewaterhouseCoopers” refers to the network of member firms of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited, each of which is a separate and independent legal entity. *connectedthinking is a trademark of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (US).
Thank you!
Olivier Cattoor [email protected]+32 2 710 4118
Olivier Kaczmarek [email protected]+32 2 710 9624