0000332104

3
5/18/2018 0000332104-slidepdf.com http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/0000332104 1/3 SAP Note Header Data Symptom You need more information on cross-company valuation in results analysis for WBS elements and sales document items The long text of message KJ 127 is difficult to understand. Other Terms KKA2, KKA3, KKAJ, KKAK Reason and Prerequisites Solution You want to perform results analysis for a WBS element or sales document item (item in a sales order or sales and distribution document). The data of a second account assignment object (WBS element, sales document item, production order, or internal order) is summarized on this account assignment object. The second account assignment object belongs to a different company code than the account assignment object for which you want to perform results analysis. Since results analysis determines work in process and reserves that can be transferred to financial accounting, data from different company codes should not be used in results analysis without reconciliation postings. Message KJ127 is issued. You can still include the data of the second company code in results analysis, however. There are two ways of doing this: 1. You can use settlement to post the data of the account assignment object from the second company code to the account assignment object for results analysis. Settlement automatically generates the necessary reconciliation postings between the company codes. If you perform results analysis as you originally intended, you do not need to change the results analysis customizing settings. Message KJ127 is still issued, but you can ignore it because the actual data from the second company code were transferred by means of settlement. You must perform settlement both before and after results analysis. The planning data of the account assignment object from the second company code were included in results analysis. You can transfer WIP and reserves to financial accounting. 2. If you don't want to use settlement to transfer the data of the account assignment object from the second company code to the account assignment object for results analysis, you can use only the summarization functions of results analysis. Remember that no reconciliation postings are generated when actual data from a second company code are used in results analysis. Use a results analysis version other than version 0. In Customizing for this results analysis version, select "Cross-company valuation" (from Release 4.0 upwards, this is under Extended Control). Message KJ127 is no longer issued. The results analysis data is now only calculated in the controlling area currency, and not in company code currency. You cannot transfer the data to financial accounting. In Customizing for the results analysis version, therefore, "Transfer to Financial Accounting" should not be turned on. If you use results analysis version 0, it is currently possible to allocate the results analysis data to another object or to profitability analysis. However, this does not make sense due to the missing reconciliation postings between the company codes. Therefore, you should use a different results analysis version. Crediting according to the settlement rule is only possible for results analysis version 0. If you have already performed results analysis with the "Cross-company valuation" indicator not selected, you cannot go back and select the indicator and then perform results analysis again. This is not supported and can result in data inconsistencies. Therefore error message KJ 130 is displayed. If you do not have to valuate the project or customer order for several companies, split the project structure plan or the customer order structure into portions that belong to one company code each. Carry out the results analysis on the basis of suitable WBS elements or items on which you valuate 332104 - Results analysis: Cross-company valuation Version 3 Validity:  02.07.2001 - active Language English Released On 01.07.2001 22:00:00 Release Status Released for Customer Component CO-PC-OBJ-MTO Product Cost by Sales Order PS-REV-RA Results Analysis Priority Recommendations / Additional Info Category Consulting Other Components

Upload: sathish-kumar-dhoni

Post on 04-Nov-2015

221 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

0000332104

TRANSCRIPT

  • SAP Note

    Header Data

    Symptom

    You need more information on cross-company valuation in results analysis for WBS elements and sales document items The long text of message KJ 127 is difficult to understand.

    Other Terms

    KKA2, KKA3, KKAJ, KKAK

    Reason and Prerequisites

    Solution

    You want to perform results analysis for a WBS element or sales document item (item in a sales order or sales and distribution document). The data of a second account assignment object (WBS element, sales document item, production order, or internal order) is summarized on this account assignment object. The second account assignment object belongs to a different company code than the account assignment object for which you want to perform results analysis. Since results analysis determines work in process and reserves that can be transferred to financial accounting, data from different company codes should not be used in results analysis without reconciliation postings. Message KJ127 is issued. You can still include the data of the second company code in results analysis, however. There are two ways of doing this:

    1. You can use settlement to post the data of the account assignment object from the second company code to the account assignment object for results analysis. Settlement automatically generates the necessary reconciliation postings between the company codes.

    If you perform results analysis as you originally intended, you do not need to change the results analysis customizing settings. Message KJ127 is still issued, but you can ignore it because the actual data from the second company code were transferred by means of settlement. You must perform settlement both before and after results analysis. The planning data of the account assignment object from the second company code were included in results analysis. You can transfer WIP and reserves to financial accounting.

    2. If you don't want to use settlement to transfer the data of the account assignment object from the second company code to the account assignment object for results analysis, you can use only the summarization functions of results analysis. Remember that no reconciliation postings are generated when actual data from a second company code are used in results analysis.

    Use a results analysis version other than version 0. In Customizing for this results analysis version, select "Cross-company valuation" (from Release 4.0 upwards, this is under Extended Control). Message KJ127 is no longer issued. The results analysis data is now only calculated in the controlling area currency, and not in company code currency. You cannot transfer the data to financial accounting. In Customizing for the results analysis version, therefore, "Transfer to Financial Accounting" should not be turned on.

    If you use results analysis version 0, it is currently possible to allocate the results analysis data to another object or to profitability analysis. However, this does not make sense due to the missing reconciliation postings between the company codes. Therefore, you should use a different results analysis version. Crediting according to the settlement rule is only possible for results analysis version 0.

    If you have already performed results analysis with the "Cross-company valuation" indicator not selected, you cannot go back and select the indicator and then perform results analysis again. This is not supported and can result in data inconsistencies. Therefore error message KJ 130 is displayed.

    If you do not have to valuate the project or customer order for several companies, split the project structure plan or the customer order structure into portions that belong to one company code each. Carry out the results analysis on the basis of suitable WBS elements or items on which you valuate

    332104 - Results analysis: Cross-company valuation

    Version 3 Validity: 02.07.2001 - active Language English

    Released On 01.07.2001 22:00:00 Release Status Released for Customer Component CO-PC-OBJ-MTO Product Cost by Sales Order

    PS-REV-RA Results Analysis

    Priority Recommendations / Additional Info Category Consulting

    Other Components

  • the data of one company code only. In the expert mode of the valuation method customizing, please set the project structure or customer order structure flag accordingly. If you have additional questions, please contact remote consulting.

    Validity

    References

    This document refers to:

    SAP Notes

    This document is referenced by:

    SAP Notes (2)

    Software Component From Rel. To Rel. And Subsequent

    SAP_APPL 300 31I

    40A 40B

    45A 45B

    46A 46B

    46C 46C

    470 470

    500 500

    600 600

    602 602

    603 603

    604 604

    605 605

    1519374 Credits from planned settlemt are not taken into account 398627 INFO: CO-PC-OBJ (Results analysis/WIP calculation)

    398627 INFO: CO-PC-OBJ (Results analysis/WIP calculation) 1519374 Credits from planned settlemt are not taken into account