01_autosteel partnership lightweight front end structure –hydroform solution and cost...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: 01_AutoSteel Partnership Lightweight Front End Structure –Hydroform Solution and Cost Analysis_Sanjay Shah](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052902/55720b7f497959fc0b8c25e5/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
w w w . a u t o s t e e l . o r g
Auto/Steel PartnershipLightweight Front End Structure –
Hydroform Solution and Cost Analysis
Sanjay ShahGeneral Motors Corporation
![Page 2: 01_AutoSteel Partnership Lightweight Front End Structure –Hydroform Solution and Cost Analysis_Sanjay Shah](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052902/55720b7f497959fc0b8c25e5/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
w w w . a u t o s t e e l . o r g
AUTO/STEEL PARTNERSHIP MEMBERS
John Catterall (GM) / Jody Shaw (USS) – Project Leaders
![Page 3: 01_AutoSteel Partnership Lightweight Front End Structure –Hydroform Solution and Cost Analysis_Sanjay Shah](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052902/55720b7f497959fc0b8c25e5/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
w w w . a u t o s t e e l . o r g
Background
Auto/Steel Partnership project on Lightweight Front End Structure using AHSS
Motivation for using AHSS:- Mass avoidance - Adequate performance- Lower overall cost
Phase I : Optimize ULSAB design using AHSSPhase II : Optimize Front Rail and Bumper system
of ’04 high volume production vehicle - Stamping Based
Phase III : - Hydroform Based
![Page 4: 01_AutoSteel Partnership Lightweight Front End Structure –Hydroform Solution and Cost Analysis_Sanjay Shah](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052902/55720b7f497959fc0b8c25e5/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
w w w . a u t o s t e e l . o r g
Donor Vehicle Baseline Design
Components 27 stampingsSteel Grade BH210 & HSLA340Weight 39.2 kg
![Page 5: 01_AutoSteel Partnership Lightweight Front End Structure –Hydroform Solution and Cost Analysis_Sanjay Shah](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052902/55720b7f497959fc0b8c25e5/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
w w w . a u t o s t e e l . o r g
Phase II : LWB Stamped Solution
Components 12 stampingsSteel Grade DP780Mass 30.5 kgMass Savings 22.4%
![Page 6: 01_AutoSteel Partnership Lightweight Front End Structure –Hydroform Solution and Cost Analysis_Sanjay Shah](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052902/55720b7f497959fc0b8c25e5/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
w w w . a u t o s t e e l . o r g
Hydroform based solution
“Aren’t there enough problems in the world?”
![Page 7: 01_AutoSteel Partnership Lightweight Front End Structure –Hydroform Solution and Cost Analysis_Sanjay Shah](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052902/55720b7f497959fc0b8c25e5/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
w w w . a u t o s t e e l . o r g
Phase III : Hydroform Design Approach
- Use same approach for optimization of Front Rail and Bumper Beam using available packaging space as in Phase II - LWB Stamped design
- Meet all the performance objectives 35 mph NCAP frontal crash, 40 mph IIHS frontal off-set crash, static stiffness and dynamic stiffness
- Optimize design for mass by incrementally pushing manufacturing frontier (expanding knowledge)
- Follow general tube hydroforming mfg. guidelines (% expansion, bend radius, corner radius etc..)
![Page 8: 01_AutoSteel Partnership Lightweight Front End Structure –Hydroform Solution and Cost Analysis_Sanjay Shah](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052902/55720b7f497959fc0b8c25e5/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
w w w . a u t o s t e e l . o r g
Solstice Structure
DP590T, 1.8mm Hydroform Rails
Current State of Art for Hydroforming – in production
![Page 9: 01_AutoSteel Partnership Lightweight Front End Structure –Hydroform Solution and Cost Analysis_Sanjay Shah](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052902/55720b7f497959fc0b8c25e5/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
w w w . a u t o s t e e l . o r g
Hydroform Solution
Max tube expansion 8%
Min cornerradius to 10mm
Min bend radius to tube diameter ratio of 2.5
Max tube expansion 8%
Min cornerradius to 10mm
Min bend radius to tube diameter ratio of 2.5
Bumper - DP980 to Martensitic 1300Hydroform – DP600 to DP800
- Optimize using DoE for Gage and Grade
![Page 10: 01_AutoSteel Partnership Lightweight Front End Structure –Hydroform Solution and Cost Analysis_Sanjay Shah](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052902/55720b7f497959fc0b8c25e5/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
w w w . a u t o s t e e l . o r g
Bumper (Inner and Outer)Mart 1300 1.2mmMart 1300 1.0mm
Rail ADP800 1.2mmDP800 1.3mm
Rail BDP800 1.3mmDP800 1.3mm
Rail CDP800 1.4mmDP600 1.4mm
Rail DDP800 2.0mmDP800 2.0mm
Rail EDP800 1.4mmDP600 1.4mm Rail F
DP800 1.3mmDP600 1.3mm
Tube Diameter (O.D.) = 108.6mm
Design 2 - Progressive CollapseSteel Grade DP800Mass 28.8 kgMass Savings 26.5%
Design 3 – Non-Progressive CollapseSteel Grade DP600 and DP800Mass 26.8 kgMass Savings 31.8%
Hydroform Solution
![Page 11: 01_AutoSteel Partnership Lightweight Front End Structure –Hydroform Solution and Cost Analysis_Sanjay Shah](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052902/55720b7f497959fc0b8c25e5/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
w w w . a u t o s t e e l . o r g
Crash Simulation
35 mph full frontal NCAP – Design 2
![Page 12: 01_AutoSteel Partnership Lightweight Front End Structure –Hydroform Solution and Cost Analysis_Sanjay Shah](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052902/55720b7f497959fc0b8c25e5/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
w w w . a u t o s t e e l . o r g
35 mph NCAPDesign 2
SIMULATION RUN 35mph NCAP
![Page 13: 01_AutoSteel Partnership Lightweight Front End Structure –Hydroform Solution and Cost Analysis_Sanjay Shah](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052902/55720b7f497959fc0b8c25e5/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
w w w . a u t o s t e e l . o r g
35 mph NCAP Design 3
SIMULATION RUN 35 mph NCAP
![Page 14: 01_AutoSteel Partnership Lightweight Front End Structure –Hydroform Solution and Cost Analysis_Sanjay Shah](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052902/55720b7f497959fc0b8c25e5/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
w w w . a u t o s t e e l . o r g
Crash Simulation Results
Crash Target Satisfied
k
![Page 15: 01_AutoSteel Partnership Lightweight Front End Structure –Hydroform Solution and Cost Analysis_Sanjay Shah](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052902/55720b7f497959fc0b8c25e5/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
w w w . a u t o s t e e l . o r g
Stiffness Results
Design
Static Torsional(Nm/deg)
StaticBending(N/mm)
DynamicTorsional
(Hz)
DynamicBending
(Hz)
Baseline 21,002 12,639 21.1 24.4Design 2 20,482 12,399 24.8 26.3Design 3 20,454 12,387 24.9 26.4
Stiffness
Stiffness Target Satisfied
![Page 16: 01_AutoSteel Partnership Lightweight Front End Structure –Hydroform Solution and Cost Analysis_Sanjay Shah](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052902/55720b7f497959fc0b8c25e5/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
w w w . a u t o s t e e l . o r g
Hydroform Solution - Mass Sensitivity
- Mass sensitivity of Bumper & Hydrof. Frt. Rail to mass of vehicle- By reducing mass of donor vehicle by 20%, additional mass savings of 12% to 18% in hydrof. rail & bumper system
Rail ADP800 1.0mm
Rail BDP600 1.4mm
Rail CDP800 1.3mm
Rail DDP600 1.4mm
Rail EDP600 1.3mm Rail F
DP600 1.0mm
Hydroform Design Option 2Mart 1300 1.0mmBumper (Inner and Outer)
Rail ADP800 1.0mm
Rail BDP600 1.4mm
Rail CDP800 1.3mm
Rail DDP600 1.4mm
Rail EDP600 1.3mm Rail F
DP600 1.0mm
Hydroform Design Option 2Mart 1300 1.0mmBumper (Inner and Outer) Mass Reduction
Design B =15.6kg (39.8%)
Mass = 23.6 kg
![Page 17: 01_AutoSteel Partnership Lightweight Front End Structure –Hydroform Solution and Cost Analysis_Sanjay Shah](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052902/55720b7f497959fc0b8c25e5/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
w w w . a u t o s t e e l . o r g
Expanding Mfg. Systems with current challenges:
- Tubes from AHSS (DP800 and DP600)- Tubes with D/t > 70 (thin wall tubing)- Tailored tubes (Soudronic, Mubea, Dofasco,
Thyssen-Krupp, Noble International, Corus etc.)
Manufacturing Frontier
![Page 18: 01_AutoSteel Partnership Lightweight Front End Structure –Hydroform Solution and Cost Analysis_Sanjay Shah](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052902/55720b7f497959fc0b8c25e5/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
w w w . a u t o s t e e l . o r g
“The main office sent us a microwave oven for our half-baked ideas.”
Tailored Tube Solution
![Page 19: 01_AutoSteel Partnership Lightweight Front End Structure –Hydroform Solution and Cost Analysis_Sanjay Shah](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052902/55720b7f497959fc0b8c25e5/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
w w w . a u t o s t e e l . o r g
0,000,200,400,600,801,001,201,401,601,802,00
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400
Rohrlänge in mm
Wan
dstä
rke
in m
m
HSLA420 TRBflexible rolled
1.0 > 1.6 > 1.8 > 1.6 > 1.0 > 1.4 > 1.0
tube length in mm
Shee
t met
al th
ickn
ess
in m
m
Flexible Rolling of Tailor Rolled Blanks
![Page 20: 01_AutoSteel Partnership Lightweight Front End Structure –Hydroform Solution and Cost Analysis_Sanjay Shah](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052902/55720b7f497959fc0b8c25e5/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
w w w . a u t o s t e e l . o r g
Tailored Tubes
![Page 21: 01_AutoSteel Partnership Lightweight Front End Structure –Hydroform Solution and Cost Analysis_Sanjay Shah](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052902/55720b7f497959fc0b8c25e5/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
w w w . a u t o s t e e l . o r g
Dofasco
![Page 22: 01_AutoSteel Partnership Lightweight Front End Structure –Hydroform Solution and Cost Analysis_Sanjay Shah](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052902/55720b7f497959fc0b8c25e5/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
w w w . a u t o s t e e l . o r g
Volvo C70 A pillar – Hydroform
Variable Wall and Diameter
![Page 23: 01_AutoSteel Partnership Lightweight Front End Structure –Hydroform Solution and Cost Analysis_Sanjay Shah](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052902/55720b7f497959fc0b8c25e5/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
w w w . a u t o s t e e l . o r g
Expanding Mfg. Systems with current challenges:
- Tubes from AHSS (DP800 and DP600)- Tubes with D/t > 70 (thin wall tubing)- Tailored tubes (Soudronic, Mubea, Dofasco
Thyssen -Krupp, Noble International, Corus etc.)
Manufacturing Frontier
- Hydroforming of AHSS, Tailored Tubes
- Joining Methods for closed section partsArc welding, Laser welding, Single Sided Spot Welding, Projection Welding, Adhesive, Mechanical Fastening etc..
![Page 24: 01_AutoSteel Partnership Lightweight Front End Structure –Hydroform Solution and Cost Analysis_Sanjay Shah](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052902/55720b7f497959fc0b8c25e5/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
w w w . a u t o s t e e l . o r g
Assembly
RailFront Cradle Mount
Rear Cradle Mount
Torque Box(not shown)
Front & RearPanel Skirt
Tie Bar Extensions
Bumper
Welding to floor(MIG or spot)
Components and Joining : MIG welding chosen as primary method
Stamped rail shown
![Page 25: 01_AutoSteel Partnership Lightweight Front End Structure –Hydroform Solution and Cost Analysis_Sanjay Shah](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052902/55720b7f497959fc0b8c25e5/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
w w w . a u t o s t e e l . o r g
888
10------
9 .130 .400 .40
796 143675
888
10------
9 .130 .400 .40
796 143675
42.52
---
6.39
5.36
30.77
Weight(kg)
---
35
1
2
32
# of Parts
Hydroformings
TOTAL
Rollformings
Tailored Blanks
Stampings
------
31.6520
------
18.906
12.7514
Weight (kg)
# of Parts
12
2
---
---
10
# of Parts
20.60
28.85
---
---
8.25
Weight (kg)
Stamped Base Hydroform
BoltsRivets
MIG Welds (m)Spot Welds
BoltsRivets
MIG Welds (m)Spot Welds
888
10------
9 .130 .400 .40
796 143675
888
10------
9 .130 .400 .40
796 143675
42.52
---
6.39
5.36
30.77
Weight(kg)
---
35
1
2
32
# of Parts
42.52
---
6.39
5.36
30.77
Weight(kg)
---
35
1
2
32
# of Parts
Hydroformings
TOTAL
Rollformings
Tailored Blanks
Stampings
Hydroformings
TOTAL
Rollformings
Tailored Blanks
Stampings
------
31.6520
------
18.906
12.7514
Weight (kg)
# of Parts
------
31.6520
------
18.906
12.7514
Weight (kg)
# of Parts
12
2
---
---
10
# of Parts
20.60
28.85
---
---
8.25
Weight (kg)
12
2
---
---
10
# of Parts
20.60
28.85
---
---
8.25
Weight (kg)
Stamped Base Hydroform
BoltsRivets
MIG Welds (m)Spot Welds
BoltsRivets
MIG Welds (m)Spot Welds
Components and Joining
![Page 26: 01_AutoSteel Partnership Lightweight Front End Structure –Hydroform Solution and Cost Analysis_Sanjay Shah](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052902/55720b7f497959fc0b8c25e5/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
w w w . a u t o s t e e l . o r g
“Do you want to be known – as discoverer of fire orfirst man to pollute ?”
Cost considerations
![Page 27: 01_AutoSteel Partnership Lightweight Front End Structure –Hydroform Solution and Cost Analysis_Sanjay Shah](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052902/55720b7f497959fc0b8c25e5/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
w w w . a u t o s t e e l . o r g
Cost Modeling Approach
General Inputs
AccountingData
ProductionVolumes
Fabrication& Assembly Process Data
MaterialPrices
StampingPress
Information
AssemblyMethod
Data
Body Results
Cost SummaryBy Hood
Stamping CostSummary per Part
Assembly Summary per Subass’y
Cost Results
Cost SummaryBy Front
End
Cost Summary per Part & by Process
Assembly Summary per Subass’y
Cost SummaryBy Front
End
Cost Summary per Part & by Process
Assembly Summary per Subass’y
Body InputsStampingPartDescription
StampingData
BlankingData
AssemblySubassemblyList
Joining Methods
HydroformingPartDescription
HydroformData
TubeData
Body CalculationsStampingCost Breakdowns Process Data
AssemblyCosts for EachJoining Method
Predicted LineDescription
HydroformingCost Breakdowns Process Data
General Inputs
AccountingData
ProductionVolumes
Fabrication& Assembly Process Data
MaterialPrices
StampingPress
Information
AssemblyMethod
Data
General Inputs
AccountingData
ProductionVolumes
Fabrication& Assembly Process Data
MaterialPrices
StampingPress
Information
AssemblyMethod
Data
Body Results
Cost SummaryBy Hood
Stamping CostSummary per Part
Assembly Summary per Subass’y
Cost Results
Cost SummaryBy Front
End
Cost Summary per Part & by Process
Assembly Summary per Subass’y
Cost SummaryBy Front
End
Cost Summary per Part & by Process
Assembly Summary per Subass’y
Body Results
Cost SummaryBy Hood
Stamping CostSummary per Part
Assembly Summary per Subass’y
Cost Results
Cost SummaryBy Front
End
Cost Summary per Part & by Process
Assembly Summary per Subass’y
Cost SummaryBy Front
End
Cost Summary per Part & by Process
Assembly Summary per Subass’y
Body InputsStampingPartDescription
StampingData
BlankingData
AssemblySubassemblyList
Joining Methods
HydroformingPartDescription
HydroformData
TubeData
Body InputsStampingPartDescription
StampingData
BlankingData
AssemblySubassemblyList
Joining Methods
HydroformingPartDescription
HydroformData
TubeData
Body CalculationsStampingCost Breakdowns Process Data
AssemblyCosts for EachJoining Method
Predicted LineDescription
HydroformingCost Breakdowns Process Data
Body CalculationsStampingCost Breakdowns Process Data
AssemblyCosts for EachJoining Method
Predicted LineDescription
HydroformingCost Breakdowns Process Data
Camanoe Associates
![Page 28: 01_AutoSteel Partnership Lightweight Front End Structure –Hydroform Solution and Cost Analysis_Sanjay Shah](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052902/55720b7f497959fc0b8c25e5/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
w w w . a u t o s t e e l . o r g
Total Cost
At 225,000 units/year
II
III
- Greenfield approach, Process based costing,, Dedicated Tooling cost, % Equipment Cost
![Page 29: 01_AutoSteel Partnership Lightweight Front End Structure –Hydroform Solution and Cost Analysis_Sanjay Shah](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052902/55720b7f497959fc0b8c25e5/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
w w w . a u t o s t e e l . o r g
Cost Analysis
Dedicated Tooling Investment
Stamped Base HydroformStamped Base Hydroform
$5.0M$4.1M$4.4MAssembly
---$8.7M$2.4MTailored Blank Stampings
$19.5M
---$0.2M
$12.5M
$15.2M$20.6MTOTAL
$5.1M---Hydroformings------Rollformings
$5.1M$7.8MStampings
$5.0M$4.1M$4.4MAssembly
---$8.7M$2.4MTailored Blank Stampings
$19.5M
---$0.2M
$12.5M
$15.2M$20.6MTOTAL
$5.1M---Hydroformings------Rollformings
$5.1M$7.8MStampings
![Page 30: 01_AutoSteel Partnership Lightweight Front End Structure –Hydroform Solution and Cost Analysis_Sanjay Shah](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052902/55720b7f497959fc0b8c25e5/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
w w w . a u t o s t e e l . o r g
Cost Analysis
Variable and Fixed CostStamped Base HydroformStamped Base Hydroform
$123$101$111TOTAL FIXED COST
*Includes labor and energy
$82$102$103TOTAL VARIABLE COST
$40$37$40Other Fixed Costs#
and overhead#Includes building, maintenance,
$39$46$54Other Variable Costs*
$214
$23$48
$49
$205$203TOTAL UNIT COST
$18$24Tooling Cost$65$40Equipment Cost
$43$56Material Cost
$123$101$111TOTAL FIXED COST
*Includes labor and energy
$82$102$103TOTAL VARIABLE COST
$40$37$40Other Fixed Costs#
and overhead#Includes building, maintenance,
$39$46$54Other Variable Costs*
$214
$23$48
$49
$205$203TOTAL UNIT COST
$18$24Tooling Cost$65$40Equipment Cost
$43$56Material Cost
II III
![Page 31: 01_AutoSteel Partnership Lightweight Front End Structure –Hydroform Solution and Cost Analysis_Sanjay Shah](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052902/55720b7f497959fc0b8c25e5/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
w w w . a u t o s t e e l . o r g
Everything these days is dot-com this and dot-net that! I can’t stand it any
more!!!
I know a web site that
can help you…
Detail report at http//www.a-sp.org
![Page 32: 01_AutoSteel Partnership Lightweight Front End Structure –Hydroform Solution and Cost Analysis_Sanjay Shah](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052902/55720b7f497959fc0b8c25e5/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
w w w . a u t o s t e e l . o r g
Detail Report at http://www.a-sp.org
Thank You
Hydroform based structure can provide mass and cost benefit
Lightweight Front End Structure
![Page 33: 01_AutoSteel Partnership Lightweight Front End Structure –Hydroform Solution and Cost Analysis_Sanjay Shah](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052902/55720b7f497959fc0b8c25e5/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
w w w . a u t o s t e e l . o r g